Application No. and Proposed Exemption involving D-11565, Citizens Bank Wealth Management, N.A., 17966-17970 [2010-7892]
Download as PDF
17966
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
B. Other Information
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
A. OMB Information Collection No.
1225–0086. Expires November 30, 2012
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
According to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
required to respond to a collection of
information unless such collection
displays a valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 20 hours per response,
including time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding the burden
estimated or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to
the U.S. Department of Labor, to the
attention of Darrin A. King,
Departmental Clearance Officer, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N–
1310, Washington, DC 20210.
Comments may also be e-mailed to
DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Please do
not return the completed application to
this address. Send it to the sponsoring
agency as specified in this solicitation.
This information is being collected for
the purpose of awarding a grant. The
information collected through this SGA
will be used by the Department to
ensure that grants are awarded to the
applicant best suited to perform the
functions of the grant. Submission of
this information is required in order for
the applicant to be considered for award
of this grant. Unless otherwise
specifically noted in this
announcement, information submitted
in the respondent’s application is not
considered to be confidential, and will
be available to the public. Applications
filed in response to this SGA may be
posted on the Department’s Web site.
Please be advised that the Grant
Officer for this competition is B. Jai
Johnson.
Application No. and Proposed
Exemption involving D–11565, Citizens
Bank Wealth Management, N.A.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
April 2010.
Donna Kelly,
Grant Officer,
Employment and Training Administration.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2010–7912 Filed 4–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemption.
SUMMARY: This document contains a
notice of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
a proposed exemption from certain of
the prohibited transaction restrictions of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act)
and/or the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (the Code).
Written Comments and Hearing
Requests
All interested persons are invited to
submit written comments or requests for
a hearing on the pending exemption,
unless otherwise stated in the Notice of
Proposed Exemption, within 45 days
from the date of publication of this
Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1)
the name, address, and telephone
number of the person making the
comment or request, and (2) the nature
of the person’s interest in the exemption
and the manner in which the person
would be adversely affected by the
exemption. A request for a hearing must
also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the
evidence to be presented at the hearing.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and
requests for a hearing (at least three
copies) should be sent to the Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Exemption
Determinations, Room N–5649, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Attention: Application No. ll, stated
in each Notice of Proposed Exemption.
Interested persons are also invited to
submit comments and/or hearing
requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX.
Any such comments or requests should
be sent either by e-mail to:
‘‘moffitt.betty@dol.gov’’, or by FAX to
(202) 219–0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The
application for exemption and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Warning: If you submit written
comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or
confidential business information that
you do not want to be publiclydisclosed. All comments and hearing
requests are posted on the Internet
exactly as they are received, and they
can be retrieved by most Internet search
engines. The Department will make no
deletions, modifications or redactions to
the comments or hearing requests
received, as they are public records.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemption
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed exemption was requested in
an application filed pursuant to section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in
accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (55 FR
32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section
102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Therefore, this notice of proposed
exemption is issued solely by the
Department.
The application contains
representations with regard to the
proposed exemption which is
summarized below. Interested persons
are referred to the application on file
with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and
representations.
Citizens Bank Wealth Management,
N.A., Located in Flint, Michigan
[Application No. D–11565]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act
and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and
in accordance with the procedures set
forth in 29 CFR Part 2570 Subpart B (55
FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Section I. Transaction
If the proposed exemption is granted,
the restrictions of section 406(a)(1)(A)
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
and (D) and section 406(b)(1) and (b)(2)
of the Act, and the sanctions resulting
from the application of section 4975 of
the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A), (D), and (E) of the Code,
shall not apply, effective December 16,
2008, to the past sale of certain Auction
Rate Securities (ARS) by the Four-Way
Tool & Die, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and
Trust (the Plan) to Citizens Republic
Bancorp (Citizens Republic), a party in
interest with respect to the Plan,
provided that the following conditions
were satisfied: 1
(A) The subject ARS were acquired for
the Plan by Citizens Bank Wealth
Management, N.A. (the Trustee), acting
in its capacity as trustee of the Plan,
from an independent broker;
(B) The last auction for each of the
ARS was unsuccessful;
(C) The sale of the ARS was directly
between the Plan and Citizens Republic
for solely cash consideration against
prompt delivery of the ARS;
(D) The sale price for each of the ARS
was equal to the par value, plus any
accrued but unpaid interest;
(E) The Plan did not waive any rights
or claims in connection with the sale;
(F) The decision to sell the ARS to the
Trustee was made by a Plan fiduciary
independent of the Trustee;
(G) The Plan did not pay any
commissions or transaction costs in
connection with the sale;
(H) The sale was not part of an
arrangement, agreement, or
understanding designed to benefit a
party in interest to the Plan;
(I) Upon termination of the Plan, the
Plan participants received 100 percent
of their account balances, and as a result
of the pre-termination sale of the ARS
to Citizens Republic at face value, plus
any accrued but unpaid interest, no
participant was adversely affected by
the absence of an auction market for the
ARS or the resulting decline in their
market value;
(J) The Trustee and its affiliate, as
applicable, maintain, or cause to be
maintained, for a period of at least six
(6) years from the date of the sale, such
records as are necessary to enable the
persons described in paragraph (K),
below, to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption, if granted,
have been met, except that—
(i) No party in interest with respect to
the Plan that engaged in the sale, other
than the Trustee and its affiliate, as
applicable, shall be subject to a civil
penalty under section 502(i) of the Act
1 For purposes of this proposed exemption,
references to section 406 of the Act should be read
to refer also to the corresponding provisions of
section 4975 of the Code.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
or the taxes imposed by section 4975(a)
and (b) of the Code, if such records are
not maintained, or are not available for
examination, as required, below, by
paragraph (K); and
(ii) A separate prohibited transaction
shall not be considered to have occurred
solely because, due to circumstances
beyond the control of the Trustee or its
affiliate, as applicable, such records are
lost or destroyed prior to the end of the
six-year period; and
(K)(i) Except as provided in
subparagraph (ii), below, and
notwithstanding any provisions of
subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 504
of the Act, the records referred to in
paragraph (J), above, are
unconditionally available at their
customary location for examination
during normal business hours by—
(a) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department, the
Internal Revenue Service, or the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission;
(b) Any fiduciary of the Plan, or any
duly authorized employee or
representative of such fiduciary; or
(c) The employer of participants of the
Plan, and any employee organization
whose members are covered by the Plan,
or any authorized employee or
representative of these entities;
(ii) None of the persons described
above in (b) or (c) of subparagraph (K)
shall be authorized to examine trade
secrets of the Trustee, or commercial or
financial information which is
privileged or confidential; and
(iii) If the Trustee refuses to disclose
information on the basis that such
information is exempt from disclosure,
the Trustee shall, by the close of the
thirtieth (30th) day following the
request, provide a written notice
advising that person of the reasons for
the refusal and that the Department may
request such information.
Section II. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption:
(A) The term ‘‘affiliate’’ means any
person, directly or indirectly, through
one or more intermediaries, controlling,
controlled by, or under common control
with such other person (with respect to
the Trustee, ‘‘affiliate’’ includes, but is
not limited to, its parent corporation,
Citizens Republic Bancorp;
(B) The term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual;
(C) The term ‘‘Auction Rate
Securities’’ or ‘‘ARS’’ means securities
that are debt instruments (generally
with a long-term nominal maturity) with
an interest rate that is reset at specific
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17967
intervals through a Dutch Auction
process;
(D) A person is ‘‘independent’’ of the
Trustee if the person is (1) not the
Trustee or an affiliate, and (2) not a
‘‘relative’’ (as defined in section 3(15) of
the Act) of the party engaging in the
transaction; and
(E) The term ‘‘Plan’’ means the FourWay Tool & Die, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
and Trust, which is an employee benefit
plan as defined in section 3(3) of the
Act, and its related trust, which is an
entity holding plan assets within the
meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3–101, as
modified by section 3(42) of the Act.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Four-Way Tool & Die, Inc. (the
Employer), located in Troy, Michigan, is
engaged in the production of tooling,
primarily for the automotive industry.
The Four-Way Tool & Die, Inc. Profit
Sharing Plan and Trust (the Plan), a
defined contribution plan qualified
under section 401(a) of the Code, was
adopted by the Employer, effective
October 1, 1969; was most recently
amended and restated, effective October
1, 2007; and was terminated, effective
January 31, 2009, and all assets were
liquidated and distributed to the Plan
participants. As of December 16, 2008,
the Plan had 16 active participants (and
no beneficiaries receiving benefits) and
total assets of approximately $4,166,240.
The Plan maintained individual
accounts for each participant, but
participants were not permitted to direct
the investment of his or her account.
2. The applicant Citizens Bank Wealth
Management, N.A. (also referred to
herein as the Trustee) was the trustee of
the Plan, beginning in October 1, 2007,
having full investment discretion under
a trust agreement with the Employer to
invest Plan assets within the guidelines
set by a written investment policy. The
Trustee is a national banking association
headquartered in Flint, Michigan and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Citizens
Republic Bancorp (Citizens Republic), a
bank holding company. Among other
things, the Trustee acts as an
institutional trustee for employee
benefit plans and is a registered
investment advisor subject to the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
3. It is represented that, on various
dates from November 2, 2007 to
December 24, 2007, the Trustee
acquired certain Auction Rate Securities
(ARS) as an investment for the Plan
through UBS Financial Services, an
independent international broker.2 The
2 The Department expresses no opinion herein as
to whether the acquisition and holding of the ARS
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
Continued
08APN1
17968
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
value of the ARS was allocated among
all participants’ accounts (in the same
manner as all other Plan investments) in
accordance with the terms of the Plan.
The Trustee describes the ARS and
the arrangement by which they are
purchased and sold as follows. The ARS
are securities (in each case herein issued
as debt) with an interest rate that is not
fixed but is reset at periodic intervals
pursuant to a process called a ‘‘Dutch
Auction.’’ Investors submit orders to
buy, hold, or sell a specific ARS to a
broker-dealer selected by the entity that
issued the ARS. The broker-dealers, in
turn, submit all of these orders to an
auction agent. The auction agent’s
functions include collecting orders from
all participating broker-dealers by the
auction deadline, determining the
amount of securities available for sale,
and organizing the bids to determine the
winning bid. If there are any buy orders
placed into the auction at a specific rate,
the auction agent accepts bids with the
lowest rate above any applicable
minimum rate and then successively
higher rates up to the maximum
applicable rate, until all sell orders and
orders that are treated as sell orders are
filled. Bids below any applicable
minimum rate or above the applicable
maximum rate are rejected. After
determining the ‘‘clearing rate’’ for all of
the securities at auction, the auction
agent allocates the ARS available for
Issuer name
sale to the participating broker-dealers
based on the orders that they submitted.
If there are multiple bids at the clearing
rate, the auction agent will allocate
securities among the bidders at such
rate on a pro rata basis. In the event of
a failed auction, existing ARS holders
receive the maximum rate set in the
official statements under which the ARS
were issued (i.e., the ‘‘default rate’’) until
such time as sufficient bids are received
to set a new clearing rate at the next
auction.
4. According to the applicant, the
subject ARS acquired for the Plan were
backed by student loans and were
primarily selected based upon the credit
rating of the issuer. Soon after the Plan’s
acquisition of the ARS, however, the
unanticipated crisis in the national
credit markets resulted in over ten
months of failed auctions.3
Consequently, the Plan was unable to
dispose of its ARS, thereby jeopardizing
liquidity to make benefit payments,
mandatory payments and withdrawals,
and expense payments when due. The
Employer’s business was also impacted
by the general economic downturn and
the dramatic decline in automobile
sales. In late 2008, the Trustee was
notified of a proposed sale of the
Employer and of its intention to
terminate the Plan by year’s end and
distribute all assets to participants as
soon as administratively possible. With
Face value
the Employer likely to be sold and
uncertainty about a new owner, Plan
participants were anxious to receive
their vested account balances.4
To relieve the situation, it is
represented that the Trustee offered to
have its parent corporation, Citizens
Republic Bancorp, purchase the ARS
directly from the Plan at their par value,
plus accrued but unpaid interest. Larry
Erickson, the owner and president of the
Employer and a fiduciary of the Plan,
orally consented after reviewing all the
material terms of the sale,5 including
the identity and par value of each of the
ARS, the interest amounts that were due
with respect to each of the ARS, and the
most recent rate information for each of
the ARS (to the extent that reliable
information was available).6 The
percentage of Plan assets involved in the
sale on December 16, 2008 was
approximately 61.56%.7
The following chart provides
information on each of the subject ARS
sold to Citizens Republic. The last
column of the chart shows the ‘‘default
rate’’ of interest for each of the ARS paid
by Citizens Republic for accrued but
unpaid interest from the date of the last
interest payment until the date of sale.
It is represented that none of the ARS
was in default in payment of interest as
of the sale date on December 16, 2008.8
CUSIP
Nature of issuer
Rating
Secondary
insurance
Rate at sale
date (%)
AMBAC Assurance.
None .................
3.135
3.198
3.398
$300,000
462590GK0 ......
Private Entity ....
Aa3/AA .............
Access to Loans for Learning
Student Loan Corporation.
Pennsylvania Higher Education
Assistance Agency.
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation.
State Board of Regents of the
State of Utah.
Illinois Student Loan Assistance
Commission.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp
300,000
00432MAR0 ......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
300,000
709163GR4 ......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
200,000
207784AG4 ......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
AMBAC Assurance.
None .................
200,000
917546EM1 ......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
None .................
2.431
350,000
452281HT8 .......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
None .................
3.325
by the Plan met the requirements of Part 4 in Title
I of the Act.
3 The applicant represents that all auctions for the
ARS subsequent to the subject sale also failed.
4 According to the applicant, the anticipated sale
of the Employer ultimately was not consummated
at the last minute, due to the rapid decline in
capital available to the prospective buyer in late
2008, but the Plan has been terminated.
5 According to the applicant, Mr. Erickson is a
member of the Citizens Bank Southeast Michigan
Advisory Board, an entity that has no management
responsibility or authority and cannot bind Citizens
Republic nor any of its affiliates; thus, the board
had no role in the subject sale of ARS by the Plan
to Citizens Republic. The board’s primary function
is in the area of public relations—ensuring
community involvement in determining important
goals and strategies for the bank to benefit the
community, identifying area charitable
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:22 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
organizations in need of support, and suggesting
ways in which the bank can effectively support the
local economy. The board is comprised of various
community leaders and bank customers, such as
Mr. Erickson. Each member of the board receives a
stipend of $550 per meeting attended; there are six
or fewer meetings per year.
6 The Department notes that the general standards
of fiduciary conduct set forth in the Act also apply
to the subject transaction described herein. In this
regard, section 404 duties respecting a plan solely
in the interest of the plan’s participants and
beneficiaries and in a prudent manner.
Accordingly, the Plan fiduciary must act prudently
with respect to, among other things: (1) the decision
to sell an ARS, following disclosure by the Trustee
of all of the relevant information; and (2) the
negotiation of the terms of such sale, including the
pricing. The Department further emphasizes that
the prudence rule described in section 404 requires
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3.135
that fiduciaries conduct an objective and thorough
decision making process that considers all of the
relevant information prior to entering into financial
transactions involving employee benefit plan assets
to ensure that all risks associated with such
transactions are understood.
7 The Department expresses no opinion herein as
to whether the percentage of Plan assets invested
in the subject ARS met the diversification
requirement of Part 4 in Title I of the Act.
8 With respect to the ARS issued by the New
Hampshire Higher Education Loan Corp, the
applicant represents that the 0.000% coupon rate
indicated in the chart was the result of earlier
interest coupon overpayments by the issuer that
had been made in error. In total, the Plan had
already received a greater amount of interest than
the issuer was responsible to pay under the terms
of the security’s official statement.
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
Issuer name
Face value
CUSIP
Nature of issuer
Rating
Secondary
insurance
17969
Rate at sale
date (%)
300,000
709163DA4 ......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
None .................
3.547
300,000
644616AV6 .......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
None .................
0.000
300,000
452281HS0 ......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
None .................
2.695
300,000
462590GF1 ......
Private Entity ....
Aaa/AAA ...........
None .................
2.695
Total ......................................
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Pennsylvania Higher Education
Assistance Agency.
New Hampshire Higher Education
Loan Corp.
Illinois Student Loan Assistance
Commission.
Iowa Student Assistance Commission.
2,850,000
5. The Trustee represents that the
Plan was their only employee benefit
plan client holding ARS. However,
numerous other individual and
corporate customers of the trust
department held ARS in their accounts.
When the business decision was made
for Citizens Republic to purchase the
illiquid ARS from the Trustee’s
customer accounts, it was determined
that all purchases should be made on
the same basis and at the same time, so
as not to differentiate among different
investors. It is represented that, because
the Trustee’s intention was to complete
the purchases prior to the close of 2008,
seeking a prospective exemption for the
one employee benefit plan customer
would have either delayed the
repurchases for all customers or
potentially disadvantaged the Plan by
not simultaneously participating in the
repurchase program. The Plan did not
waive any rights or claims in connection
with the sale of ARS to Citizens
Republic.
The applicant represents that the sale
of the ARS by the Plan to Citizens
Republic was in the best interests of
Plan because the sale permitted the Plan
to pay benefits and expenses of
administration and to proceed with
termination, effective January 31, 2009,
and the prompt distribution of cash to
all participants. Further, according to
the applicant, the extreme illiquidity in
the credit markets at the time, and over
ten months of failed auctions, made it
very apparent that all the ARS held by
the Plan had a fair market value below
par and could not be worth more than
that amount in the near term, given the
historically low interest rate
environment.9 The sale was for solely
cash consideration against prompt
delivery of the ARS, and the Plan did
not pay any commissions or transaction
9 According to the applicant, due to the failure of
the primary market, a secondary market arose;
information obtained from secondary market
activity, as well as third party valuations, indicates
that these particular ARS issues have traded at
discounts averaging between 72.0% and 84.5% of
par.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:22 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
costs in connection with the sale. It is
represented that, upon termination of
the Plan, the Plan participants received
100 percent of their account balances,
and as a result of the pre-termination
sale of the ARS to Citizens Republic at
face value, plus any accrued but unpaid
interest, no participant was adversely
affected by the absence of an auction
market for the ARS or the resulting
decline in their market value.
The Trustee is bearing the costs of the
exemption application. The Employer is
bearing the costs of notifying interested
persons.
6. In summary, the subject transaction
satisfied the statutory criteria for an
exemption under section 408(a) of the
Act for the following reasons: (a) The
sale of the ARS was directly between
the Plan and Citizens Republic for
solely cash consideration against
prompt delivery of the ARS; (b) the sale
price for each of the ARS was equal to
the par value, plus any accrued but
unpaid interest; (c) the Plan did not
waive any rights or claims in connection
with the sale; (d) the decision to sell the
ARS to the Trustee was made by the
Employer, who is independent of the
Trustee, after receiving disclosure of all
the material terms of the sale; (e) the
Plan did not pay any commissions or
transaction costs in connection with the
sale; and (f) upon termination of the
Plan, the Plan participants received 100
percent of their account balances, and as
a result of the pre-termination sale of
the ARS to Citizens Republic at face
value, plus any accrued but unpaid
interest, no participant was adversely
affected by the absence of an auction
market for the ARS or the resulting
decline in their market value.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Karin Weng of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8557. (This is not
a toll-free.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which, among other things,
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be
granted under section 408(a) of the Act
and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code,
the Department must find that the
exemption is administratively feasible,
in the interests of the plan and of its
participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemption, if
granted, will be supplemental to, and
not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transitional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemption, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in each
application are true and complete, and
that each application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
17970
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
April, 2010.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2010–7892 Filed 4–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–410; NRC–2010–0117]
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC;
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit
No. 2; Draft Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact Related to the
Proposed License Amendment To
Increase the Maximum Reactor Power
Level, Correction
AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION: Draft Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact; Correction.
SUMMARY: This document corrects a
draft Environmental Assessment (EA)
appearing in the Federal Register on
March 22, 2010 (75 FR 13600). This
action is necessary to state the
expiration date of the 30-day public
comment period and to include
instructions for submitting written
comments to the NRC. The corrected
draft EA is provided as follows: In
accordance with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC
has prepared a draft EA as part of its
evaluation of a request by Nine Mile
Point Nuclear Station, LLC (the
licensee) for a license amendment to
increase the maximum thermal power at
the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station,
Unit No. 2 (NMP2) from 3,467
megawatts thermal (MWt) to 3,988 MWt.
This represents a power increase of
approximately 15 percent over the
current licensed thermal power, and
approximately 20 percent from the
original licensed power level of 3,323
MWt. The NRC staff did not identify any
significant environmental impact
associated with the proposed action
based on its evaluation of the
information provided in the licensee’s
extended power uprate (EPU)
application and other available
information. The draft EA and Finding
of No Significant Impact are being
published in the Federal Register with
a 30-day public comment period ending
May 10, 2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Environmental Assessment
Plant Site and Environs
The Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station
(NMPNS) site is in the town of Scriba,
in the northwest corner of Oswego
County, New York, on the south shore
of Lake Ontario. The site is comprised
of approximately 900 acres that includes
two nuclear reactors and ancillary
facilities. NMP2 uses a boiling-water
reactor and a nuclear steam supply
system designed by General Electric.
Identification of the Proposed Action
By application dated May 27, 2009,
the licensee requested an amendment
for an EPU for NMP2 to increase the
licensed thermal power level from 3,467
MWt to 3,988 MWt, which represents an
increase of approximately 15% above
the current licensed thermal power and
approximately 20% over the original
licensed thermal power level. This
change in core thermal level requires
the NRC to amend the facility’s
operating license. The operational goal
of the proposed EPU is a corresponding
increase in electrical output from 1,211
MWe to 1,369 MWe. The proposed
action is considered an EPU by NRC
because it exceeds the typical 7% power
increase that can be accommodated with
only minor plant changes. EPUs
typically involve extensive
modifications to the nuclear steam
supply system.
The licensee plans to make the
physical changes to plant components
needed to implement the proposed EPU
over the course of two refueling outages
currently scheduled for 2010 and 2012.
The actual power uprate, if approved by
the NRC, would occur in a single
increase following the 2012 refueling
outage.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action provides
NMPNS with the flexibility to increase
the potential electrical output of NMP2
and to supply low cost, reliable, and
efficient electrical generation to New
York State and the region. The
additional 158 MWe would be enough
to power approximately 174,000 homes.
The proposed EPU at NMP2 would
contribute to meeting the goals and
recommendations of the New York State
Energy Plan for maintaining the reserve
margin and reducing greenhouse gas
emissions with low cost, efficient, and
reliable electrical generation. The
proposed action provides the licensee
with the flexibility to increase the
potential electrical output of NMP2 to
New York State and the region from its
existing power station without building
a new electric power generation station
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or importing energy from outside the
region.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
As part of the licensing process for
NMP2, the NRC published a Final
Environmental Statement (FES) in May
1985. The NRC staff noted that the
impact of any activity authorized by the
license would be encompassed by the
overall action evaluated in the FES for
the operation of NMP2. In addition, the
NRC evaluated the environmental
impacts of operating NMP2 for an
additional 20 years beyond its current
operating license, and determined that
the environmental impacts of license
renewal were small. The NRC staff’s
evaluation is contained in NUREG–
1437, ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact
Statement for License Renewal of
Nuclear Plant, Supplement 24,
Regarding Nine Mile Point Nuclear
Station, Units 1 and 2’’ (SEIS–24) issued
in May 2006 (Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Accession No.
ML061290310). The NRC staff used
information from the licensee’s license
amendment request, the FES, and the
SEIS–24 to perform its EA for the
proposed EPU.
The NMP2 EPU is expected to be
implemented without making extensive
changes to buildings or plant systems
that directly or indirectly interface with
the environment. All necessary
modifications would be performed in
existing buildings at NMP2. With the
exception of the high-pressure turbine
rotor replacement, the required
modifications are generally small in
scope. Other modifications include
providing additional cooling for some
plant systems, modifications to
feedwater pumps, modifications to
accommodate greater steam and
condensate flow rates, and
instrumentation upgrades that include
minor items such as replacing parts,
changing setpoints and modifying
software.
The sections below describe the nonradiological and radiological impacts in
the environment that may result from
the proposed EPU.
Non-Radiological Impacts
Land Use and Aesthetic Impacts
Potential land use and aesthetic
impacts from the proposed EPU include
impacts from plant modifications at
NMP2. While some plant components
would be modified, most plant changes
related to the proposed EPU would
occur within existing structures,
buildings, and fenced equipment yards
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 67 (Thursday, April 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17966-17970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7892]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Application No. and Proposed Exemption involving D-11565,
Citizens Bank Wealth Management, N.A.
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains a notice of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of a proposed exemption from
certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
Written Comments and Hearing Requests
All interested persons are invited to submit written comments or
requests for a hearing on the pending exemption, unless otherwise
stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, within 45 days from the
date of publication of this Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1) the name, address, and
telephone number of the person making the comment or request, and (2)
the nature of the person's interest in the exemption and the manner in
which the person would be adversely affected by the exemption. A
request for a hearing must also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the evidence to be presented at the
hearing.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and requests for a hearing (at least
three copies) should be sent to the Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA), Office of Exemption Determinations, Room N-5649,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210. Attention: Application No. ----, stated in each Notice of
Proposed Exemption. Interested persons are also invited to submit
comments and/or hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX. Any such
comments or requests should be sent either by e-mail to:
``moffitt.betty@dol.gov'', or by FAX to (202) 219-0204 by the end of
the scheduled comment period. The application for exemption and the
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N-1513, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: If you submit written comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or confidential business
information that you do not want to be publicly-disclosed. All comments
and hearing requests are posted on the Internet exactly as they are
received, and they can be retrieved by most Internet search engines.
The Department will make no deletions, modifications or redactions to
the comments or hearing requests received, as they are public records.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemption will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal Register. Such
notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed exemption as
published in the Federal Register and shall inform interested persons
of their right to comment and to request a hearing (where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed exemption was requested in an
application filed pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4
of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred the authority of the
Secretary of the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested to
the Secretary of Labor. Therefore, this notice of proposed exemption is
issued solely by the Department.
The application contains representations with regard to the
proposed exemption which is summarized below. Interested persons are
referred to the application on file with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and representations.
Citizens Bank Wealth Management, N.A., Located in Flint, Michigan
[Application No. D-11565]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code, and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570 Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Section I. Transaction
If the proposed exemption is granted, the restrictions of section
406(a)(1)(A)
[[Page 17967]]
and (D) and section 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act, and the sanctions
resulting from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1)(A), (D), and (E) of the Code, shall not apply,
effective December 16, 2008, to the past sale of certain Auction Rate
Securities (ARS) by the Four-Way Tool & Die, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
and Trust (the Plan) to Citizens Republic Bancorp (Citizens Republic),
a party in interest with respect to the Plan, provided that the
following conditions were satisfied: \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this proposed exemption, references to
section 406 of the Act should be read to refer also to the
corresponding provisions of section 4975 of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) The subject ARS were acquired for the Plan by Citizens Bank
Wealth Management, N.A. (the Trustee), acting in its capacity as
trustee of the Plan, from an independent broker;
(B) The last auction for each of the ARS was unsuccessful;
(C) The sale of the ARS was directly between the Plan and Citizens
Republic for solely cash consideration against prompt delivery of the
ARS;
(D) The sale price for each of the ARS was equal to the par value,
plus any accrued but unpaid interest;
(E) The Plan did not waive any rights or claims in connection with
the sale;
(F) The decision to sell the ARS to the Trustee was made by a Plan
fiduciary independent of the Trustee;
(G) The Plan did not pay any commissions or transaction costs in
connection with the sale;
(H) The sale was not part of an arrangement, agreement, or
understanding designed to benefit a party in interest to the Plan;
(I) Upon termination of the Plan, the Plan participants received
100 percent of their account balances, and as a result of the pre-
termination sale of the ARS to Citizens Republic at face value, plus
any accrued but unpaid interest, no participant was adversely affected
by the absence of an auction market for the ARS or the resulting
decline in their market value;
(J) The Trustee and its affiliate, as applicable, maintain, or
cause to be maintained, for a period of at least six (6) years from the
date of the sale, such records as are necessary to enable the persons
described in paragraph (K), below, to determine whether the conditions
of this exemption, if granted, have been met, except that--
(i) No party in interest with respect to the Plan that engaged in
the sale, other than the Trustee and its affiliate, as applicable,
shall be subject to a civil penalty under section 502(i) of the Act or
the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if such
records are not maintained, or are not available for examination, as
required, below, by paragraph (K); and
(ii) A separate prohibited transaction shall not be considered to
have occurred solely because, due to circumstances beyond the control
of the Trustee or its affiliate, as applicable, such records are lost
or destroyed prior to the end of the six-year period; and
(K)(i) Except as provided in subparagraph (ii), below, and
notwithstanding any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section
504 of the Act, the records referred to in paragraph (J), above, are
unconditionally available at their customary location for examination
during normal business hours by--
(a) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department, the Internal Revenue Service, or the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission;
(b) Any fiduciary of the Plan, or any duly authorized employee or
representative of such fiduciary; or
(c) The employer of participants of the Plan, and any employee
organization whose members are covered by the Plan, or any authorized
employee or representative of these entities;
(ii) None of the persons described above in (b) or (c) of
subparagraph (K) shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of the
Trustee, or commercial or financial information which is privileged or
confidential; and
(iii) If the Trustee refuses to disclose information on the basis
that such information is exempt from disclosure, the Trustee shall, by
the close of the thirtieth (30th) day following the request, provide a
written notice advising that person of the reasons for the refusal and
that the Department may request such information.
Section II. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption:
(A) The term ``affiliate'' means any person, directly or
indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with such other person (with respect to the
Trustee, ``affiliate'' includes, but is not limited to, its parent
corporation, Citizens Republic Bancorp;
(B) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual;
(C) The term ``Auction Rate Securities'' or ``ARS'' means
securities that are debt instruments (generally with a long-term
nominal maturity) with an interest rate that is reset at specific
intervals through a Dutch Auction process;
(D) A person is ``independent'' of the Trustee if the person is (1)
not the Trustee or an affiliate, and (2) not a ``relative'' (as defined
in section 3(15) of the Act) of the party engaging in the transaction;
and
(E) The term ``Plan'' means the Four-Way Tool & Die, Inc. Profit
Sharing Plan and Trust, which is an employee benefit plan as defined in
section 3(3) of the Act, and its related trust, which is an entity
holding plan assets within the meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3-101, as
modified by section 3(42) of the Act.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Four-Way Tool & Die, Inc. (the Employer), located in Troy,
Michigan, is engaged in the production of tooling, primarily for the
automotive industry. The Four-Way Tool & Die, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
and Trust (the Plan), a defined contribution plan qualified under
section 401(a) of the Code, was adopted by the Employer, effective
October 1, 1969; was most recently amended and restated, effective
October 1, 2007; and was terminated, effective January 31, 2009, and
all assets were liquidated and distributed to the Plan participants. As
of December 16, 2008, the Plan had 16 active participants (and no
beneficiaries receiving benefits) and total assets of approximately
$4,166,240. The Plan maintained individual accounts for each
participant, but participants were not permitted to direct the
investment of his or her account.
2. The applicant Citizens Bank Wealth Management, N.A. (also
referred to herein as the Trustee) was the trustee of the Plan,
beginning in October 1, 2007, having full investment discretion under a
trust agreement with the Employer to invest Plan assets within the
guidelines set by a written investment policy. The Trustee is a
national banking association headquartered in Flint, Michigan and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Citizens Republic Bancorp (Citizens
Republic), a bank holding company. Among other things, the Trustee acts
as an institutional trustee for employee benefit plans and is a
registered investment advisor subject to the Investment Advisers Act of
1940.
3. It is represented that, on various dates from November 2, 2007
to December 24, 2007, the Trustee acquired certain Auction Rate
Securities (ARS) as an investment for the Plan through UBS Financial
Services, an independent international broker.\2\ The
[[Page 17968]]
value of the ARS was allocated among all participants' accounts (in the
same manner as all other Plan investments) in accordance with the terms
of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Department expresses no opinion herein as to whether the
acquisition and holding of the ARS by the Plan met the requirements
of Part 4 in Title I of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Trustee describes the ARS and the arrangement by which they are
purchased and sold as follows. The ARS are securities (in each case
herein issued as debt) with an interest rate that is not fixed but is
reset at periodic intervals pursuant to a process called a ``Dutch
Auction.'' Investors submit orders to buy, hold, or sell a specific ARS
to a broker-dealer selected by the entity that issued the ARS. The
broker-dealers, in turn, submit all of these orders to an auction
agent. The auction agent's functions include collecting orders from all
participating broker-dealers by the auction deadline, determining the
amount of securities available for sale, and organizing the bids to
determine the winning bid. If there are any buy orders placed into the
auction at a specific rate, the auction agent accepts bids with the
lowest rate above any applicable minimum rate and then successively
higher rates up to the maximum applicable rate, until all sell orders
and orders that are treated as sell orders are filled. Bids below any
applicable minimum rate or above the applicable maximum rate are
rejected. After determining the ``clearing rate'' for all of the
securities at auction, the auction agent allocates the ARS available
for sale to the participating broker-dealers based on the orders that
they submitted. If there are multiple bids at the clearing rate, the
auction agent will allocate securities among the bidders at such rate
on a pro rata basis. In the event of a failed auction, existing ARS
holders receive the maximum rate set in the official statements under
which the ARS were issued (i.e., the ``default rate'') until such time
as sufficient bids are received to set a new clearing rate at the next
auction.
4. According to the applicant, the subject ARS acquired for the
Plan were backed by student loans and were primarily selected based
upon the credit rating of the issuer. Soon after the Plan's acquisition
of the ARS, however, the unanticipated crisis in the national credit
markets resulted in over ten months of failed auctions.\3\
Consequently, the Plan was unable to dispose of its ARS, thereby
jeopardizing liquidity to make benefit payments, mandatory payments and
withdrawals, and expense payments when due. The Employer's business was
also impacted by the general economic downturn and the dramatic decline
in automobile sales. In late 2008, the Trustee was notified of a
proposed sale of the Employer and of its intention to terminate the
Plan by year's end and distribute all assets to participants as soon as
administratively possible. With the Employer likely to be sold and
uncertainty about a new owner, Plan participants were anxious to
receive their vested account balances.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The applicant represents that all auctions for the ARS
subsequent to the subject sale also failed.
\4\ According to the applicant, the anticipated sale of the
Employer ultimately was not consummated at the last minute, due to
the rapid decline in capital available to the prospective buyer in
late 2008, but the Plan has been terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To relieve the situation, it is represented that the Trustee
offered to have its parent corporation, Citizens Republic Bancorp,
purchase the ARS directly from the Plan at their par value, plus
accrued but unpaid interest. Larry Erickson, the owner and president of
the Employer and a fiduciary of the Plan, orally consented after
reviewing all the material terms of the sale,\5\ including the identity
and par value of each of the ARS, the interest amounts that were due
with respect to each of the ARS, and the most recent rate information
for each of the ARS (to the extent that reliable information was
available).\6\ The percentage of Plan assets involved in the sale on
December 16, 2008 was approximately 61.56%.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ According to the applicant, Mr. Erickson is a member of the
Citizens Bank Southeast Michigan Advisory Board, an entity that has
no management responsibility or authority and cannot bind Citizens
Republic nor any of its affiliates; thus, the board had no role in
the subject sale of ARS by the Plan to Citizens Republic. The
board's primary function is in the area of public relations--
ensuring community involvement in determining important goals and
strategies for the bank to benefit the community, identifying area
charitable organizations in need of support, and suggesting ways in
which the bank can effectively support the local economy. The board
is comprised of various community leaders and bank customers, such
as Mr. Erickson. Each member of the board receives a stipend of $550
per meeting attended; there are six or fewer meetings per year.
\6\ The Department notes that the general standards of fiduciary
conduct set forth in the Act also apply to the subject transaction
described herein. In this regard, section 404 duties respecting a
plan solely in the interest of the plan's participants and
beneficiaries and in a prudent manner. Accordingly, the Plan
fiduciary must act prudently with respect to, among other things:
(1) the decision to sell an ARS, following disclosure by the Trustee
of all of the relevant information; and (2) the negotiation of the
terms of such sale, including the pricing. The Department further
emphasizes that the prudence rule described in section 404 requires
that fiduciaries conduct an objective and thorough decision making
process that considers all of the relevant information prior to
entering into financial transactions involving employee benefit plan
assets to ensure that all risks associated with such transactions
are understood.
\7\ The Department expresses no opinion herein as to whether the
percentage of Plan assets invested in the subject ARS met the
diversification requirement of Part 4 in Title I of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following chart provides information on each of the subject ARS
sold to Citizens Republic. The last column of the chart shows the
``default rate'' of interest for each of the ARS paid by Citizens
Republic for accrued but unpaid interest from the date of the last
interest payment until the date of sale. It is represented that none of
the ARS was in default in payment of interest as of the sale date on
December 16, 2008.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ With respect to the ARS issued by the New Hampshire Higher
Education Loan Corp, the applicant represents that the 0.000% coupon
rate indicated in the chart was the result of earlier interest
coupon overpayments by the issuer that had been made in error. In
total, the Plan had already received a greater amount of interest
than the issuer was responsible to pay under the terms of the
security's official statement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secondary Rate at sale
Issuer name Face value CUSIP Nature of issuer Rating insurance date (%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp. $300,000 462590GK0........... Private Entity...... Aa3/AA.............. AMBAC Assurance.... 3.135
Access to Loans for Learning 300,000 00432MAR0........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. None............... 3.135
Student Loan Corporation.
Pennsylvania Higher Education 300,000 709163GR4........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. AMBAC Assurance.... 3.198
Assistance Agency.
Connecticut Student Loan 200,000 207784AG4........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. None............... 3.398
Foundation.
State Board of Regents of the 200,000 917546EM1........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. None............... 2.431
State of Utah.
Illinois Student Loan Assistance 350,000 452281HT8........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. None............... 3.325
Commission.
[[Page 17969]]
Pennsylvania Higher Education 300,000 709163DA4........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. None............... 3.547
Assistance Agency.
New Hampshire Higher Education 300,000 644616AV6........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. None............... 0.000
Loan Corp.
Illinois Student Loan Assistance 300,000 452281HS0........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. None............... 2.695
Commission.
Iowa Student Assistance 300,000 462590GF1........... Private Entity...... Aaa/AAA............. None............... 2.695
Commission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................ 2,850,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. The Trustee represents that the Plan was their only employee
benefit plan client holding ARS. However, numerous other individual and
corporate customers of the trust department held ARS in their accounts.
When the business decision was made for Citizens Republic to purchase
the illiquid ARS from the Trustee's customer accounts, it was
determined that all purchases should be made on the same basis and at
the same time, so as not to differentiate among different investors. It
is represented that, because the Trustee's intention was to complete
the purchases prior to the close of 2008, seeking a prospective
exemption for the one employee benefit plan customer would have either
delayed the repurchases for all customers or potentially disadvantaged
the Plan by not simultaneously participating in the repurchase program.
The Plan did not waive any rights or claims in connection with the sale
of ARS to Citizens Republic.
The applicant represents that the sale of the ARS by the Plan to
Citizens Republic was in the best interests of Plan because the sale
permitted the Plan to pay benefits and expenses of administration and
to proceed with termination, effective January 31, 2009, and the prompt
distribution of cash to all participants. Further, according to the
applicant, the extreme illiquidity in the credit markets at the time,
and over ten months of failed auctions, made it very apparent that all
the ARS held by the Plan had a fair market value below par and could
not be worth more than that amount in the near term, given the
historically low interest rate environment.\9\ The sale was for solely
cash consideration against prompt delivery of the ARS, and the Plan did
not pay any commissions or transaction costs in connection with the
sale. It is represented that, upon termination of the Plan, the Plan
participants received 100 percent of their account balances, and as a
result of the pre-termination sale of the ARS to Citizens Republic at
face value, plus any accrued but unpaid interest, no participant was
adversely affected by the absence of an auction market for the ARS or
the resulting decline in their market value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ According to the applicant, due to the failure of the
primary market, a secondary market arose; information obtained from
secondary market activity, as well as third party valuations,
indicates that these particular ARS issues have traded at discounts
averaging between 72.0% and 84.5% of par.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Trustee is bearing the costs of the exemption application. The
Employer is bearing the costs of notifying interested persons.
6. In summary, the subject transaction satisfied the statutory
criteria for an exemption under section 408(a) of the Act for the
following reasons: (a) The sale of the ARS was directly between the
Plan and Citizens Republic for solely cash consideration against prompt
delivery of the ARS; (b) the sale price for each of the ARS was equal
to the par value, plus any accrued but unpaid interest; (c) the Plan
did not waive any rights or claims in connection with the sale; (d) the
decision to sell the ARS to the Trustee was made by the Employer, who
is independent of the Trustee, after receiving disclosure of all the
material terms of the sale; (e) the Plan did not pay any commissions or
transaction costs in connection with the sale; and (f) upon termination
of the Plan, the Plan participants received 100 percent of their
account balances, and as a result of the pre-termination sale of the
ARS to Citizens Republic at face value, plus any accrued but unpaid
interest, no participant was adversely affected by the absence of an
auction market for the ARS or the resulting decline in their market
value.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karin Weng of the Department,
telephone (202) 693-8557. (This is not a toll-free.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption
under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified
person from certain other provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction provisions to which the exemption
does not apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of
section 404 of the Act, which, among other things, require a fiduciary
to discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of
the participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion
in accordance with section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does it affect
the requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer
maintaining the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be granted under section 408(a) of the
Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, the Department must find
that the exemption is administratively feasible, in the interests of
the plan and of its participants and beneficiaries, and protective of
the rights of participants and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemption, if granted, will be supplemental to,
and not in derogation of, any other provisions of the Act and/or the
Code, including statutory or administrative exemptions and transitional
rules. Furthermore, the fact that a transaction is subject to an
administrative or statutory exemption is not dispositive of whether the
transaction is in fact a prohibited transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemption, if granted, will be subject to the
express condition that the material facts and representations contained
in each application are true and complete, and that each application
accurately describes all material terms of the transaction which is the
subject of the exemption.
[[Page 17970]]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of April, 2010.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2010-7892 Filed 4-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P