Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 17827-17828 [2010-7874]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
markings shall be in letters and numerals not
less than 2 mm (0.078 inch) high and raised
above or sunk below the tire surface not less
that 0.4 mm (0.015 inch), except that the
marking depth shall be not less than 0.25 mm
(0.010 inch) in the case of motorcycle tires.
The tire identification and the DOT symbol
labeling shall comply with part 574 of this
chapter. Markings may appear on only one
sidewall and the entire sidewall area may be
used in the case of motorcycle tires and
recreational, boat, baggage, and special trailer
tires * * *
(d) The maximum load rating and
corresponding inflation pressure of the tire,
shown as follows:
(Mark on tires rated for single and dual
load): Max load single __kg (__lb) at __kPa
(__psi) cold. Max load dual __kg (__lb) at
__kPa (__psi) cold.
(Mark on tires rated only for single load):
Max load __kg (__lb) at __kPa (__psi) cold.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
CMA explained that the subject tires
are marketed with the correct maximum
load rating and corresponding inflation
pressure in both English and Metric
units. The affected tires have English
units on one sidewall and Metric units
on the other sidewall. The
noncompliance being that both English
and Metric units do not both appear on
each sidewall.
CMA stated that it believes the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety because correct
maximum load rating and
corresponding inflation pressure
information is marked on each tire in
both English and Metric units.
Therefore, that information is readily
available to anyone who uses the tires.
CMA requested that NHTSA consider
its petition and grant an exemption from
the recall requirements of the National
Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act on
the basis that the noncompliance
described above is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
NHTSA Decision
The agency agrees with CMA that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. The agency
believes that the true measure of
inconsequentiality to motor vehicle
safety in this case is that there is no
effect on the operational safety of
vehicles on which these tires are
mounted.
While the correct tire inflation
pressure is included on the subject tire
sidewalls, it is not marked in both
English and Metric unit systems on each
sidewall as required by S6.5(d).
However, because the tire inflation
pressure is available and stated correctly
on each tire, in each unit system, albeit
separately, it is unlikely that a consumer
will not find or will misread pressure
units due to the noncompliance.
Therefore, the tires, as labeled, are likely
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
to achieve the safety purpose of the
standard. In the agency’s judgment, the
subject incorrect labeling of the tire
inflation pressure information will have
an inconsequential effect on motor
vehicle safety.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that CMA has met
its burden of persuasion that the subject
FMVSS No. 119 labeling noncompliance
is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety. Accordingly, CMA’s petition is
granted and the petitioner is exempted
from the obligation of providing
notification of, and a remedy for, the
subject noncompliance under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120.
17827
For further information on this
decision, contact Mr. George Gillespie,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–5299, facsimile (202) 366–
7002.
Affected are approximately 9,864 size
245/45R17 95H Fierce HP brand
passenger car tires manufactured during
the period January 25, 2007, through
July 24, 2008.
Paragraph S5.5(e) of FMVSS No. 139
requires in pertinent part:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company,
Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
S5.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in
paragraphs (a) through (i) of S5.5, each tire
must be marked on each sidewall with the
information specified in S5.5(a) through (d)
and on one sidewall with the information
specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this
standard. The markings must be placed
between the maximum section width and the
bead on at least one sidewall, unless the
maximum section width of the tire is located
in an area that is not more than one-fourth
of the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire. If the maximum section width
falls within that area, those markings must
appear between the bead and a point one-half
the distance from the bead to the shoulder of
the tire, on at least one sidewall. The
markings must be in letters and numerals not
less than 0.078 inches high and raised above
or sunk below the tire surface not less than
0.015 inches * * *
(e) The generic name of each cord material
used in the plies (both sidewall and tread
area) of the tire; * * *
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
(Goodyear), has determined that certain
passenger car tires manufactured during
the period January 25, 2007, through
July 24, 2008, do not fully comply with
paragraph S5.5(e) of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) No.
139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for
Light Vehicles. Goodyear has filed an
appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and the rule implementing
those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556,
Goodyear has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of
the petition was published, with a 30day public comment period, on January
13, 2009, in the Federal Register (74 FR
1760). No comments were received. To
view the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/ then follow the
online search instructions to locate
docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2008–0213.’’
Goodyear explains that the
noncompliance is that the sidewall
marking incorrectly identifies the
generic material of the plies in the body
of the tire as Nylon when they are in
fact polyester. Specifically, the tires in
question were inadvertently
manufactured with ‘‘Tread: 1 Polyester +
2 Steel Cords + 1 Nylon Cord. The
labeling should have been ‘‘Tread: 1
Polyester Cord + 2 Steel Cords + 1
Polyester Cord’’ (emphasis added).
Goodyear states that it discovered the
mold labeling error that caused the noncompliance during a routine quality
audit.
Goodyear argues that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety because the tires
meet or exceed all applicable Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety performance
standards. All of the markings related to
tire service (load capacity,
corresponding inflation pressure, etc.)
are correct. The mislabeling of these
tires creates no unsafe condition.
Goodyear states that the affected tire
molds have been modified and all future
production will have the correct
material information shown on the
sidewall.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8).
Issued on: April 1, 2010.
Claude Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2010–7866 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0213; Notice 2]
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
17828
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
Goodyear also points out that NHTSA
has previously granted petitions for
sidewall marking noncompliances that
it believes are similar to the present
noncompliance.
In summation, Goodyear states that it
believes that because the
noncompliances are inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety that no corrective
action is warranted.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
NHTSA Decision
The agency agrees with Goodyear that
the noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. The agency
believes that the true measure of
inconsequentiality to motor vehicle
safety in this case is that there is no
effect of the noncompliance on the
operational safety of vehicles on which
these tires are mounted. The safety of
people working in the tire retread,
repair, and recycling industries must
also be considered. Although tire
construction affects the strength and
durability, neither the agency nor the
tire industry provides information
relating tire strength and durability to
the number of plies and types of ply
cord material in the tread and sidewall.
Therefore, tire dealers and customers
should consider the tire construction
information along with other
information such as the load capacity,
maximum inflation pressure, and tread
wear, temperature, and traction ratings,
to assess performance capabilities of
various tires. In the agency’s judgment,
the incorrect labeling of the tire
construction information will have an
inconsequential effect on motor vehicle
safety because most consumers do not
base tire purchases or vehicle operation
parameters on the ply material in a tire.
The agency also believes the
noncompliance will have no measurable
effect on the safety of the tire retread,
repair, and recycling industries. The use
of steel cord construction in the
sidewall and tread is the primary safety
concern of these industries. In this case,
since the tire sidewalls are marked
correctly for the number of steel plies,
this potential safety concern does not
exist.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that Goodyear has
met its burden of persuasion that the
subject FMVSS No. 139 labeling
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
Goodyear’s petition is granted and the
petitioner is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of,
and a remedy for, the subject
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118
and 30120.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and
501.8.
Issued on: April 1, 2010.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2010–7874 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0005; Notice 2]
Michelin North America, Inc., Grant of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Michelin North America, Inc.
(Michelin), has determined that certain
passenger car tires manufactured
between September 18, 2008, and
October 10, 2008, did not fully comply
with paragraphs S5.5(e) and S5.5(f) of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) No. 139, New Pneumatic
Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. Michelin
has filed an appropriate report pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and the rule implementing
those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556,
Michelin has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of
the petition was published, with a
30-day public comment period, on
February 19, 2009, in the Federal
Register (74 FR 7738). No comments
were received. To view the petition and
all supporting documents log onto the
Federal Docket Management System
Web site at:
https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2009–
0005.’’
For further information on this
decision, contact Mr. George Gillespie,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–5299, facsimile (202) 366–
7002.
Affected are approximately 2,240 size
P195/60R15 (87T) Michelin Harmony
brand passenger car tires manufactured
between September 18, 2008, and
October 10, 2008, at Michelin’s plant
located in Pictou, Canada.
Approximately 1,590 of these tires have
been delivered to Michelin’s customers.
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The remaining tires (approximately 650)
are being held in Michelin’s possession
until they can be correctly relabeled.
Paragraphs S5.5(e)and S5.5(f) of
FMVSS No. 139 require in pertinent
part:
S5.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in
paragraphs (a) through (i) of S5.5, each tire
must be marked on each sidewall with the
information specified in S5.5(a) through (d)
and on one sidewall with the information
specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this
standard. The markings must be placed
between the maximum section width and the
bead on at least one sidewall, unless the
maximum section width of the tire is located
in an area that is not more than one-fourth
of the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire. If the maximum section width
falls within that area, those markings must
appear between the bead and a point one-half
the distance from the bead to the shoulder of
the tire, on at least one sidewall. The
markings must be in letters and numerals not
less than 0.078 inches high and raised above
or sunk below the tire surface not less than
0.015 inches* * *
(e) The generic name of each cord material
used in the plies (both sidewall and tread
area) of the tire;* * *
(f) The actual number of plies in the
sidewall, and the actual number of plies in
the tread area, if different * * *
Michelin explains that the
noncompliance is that, due to a mold
labeling error, the sidewall marking on
the reference side of the tires incorrectly
describes the number of plies in the
tread area of the tires. Specifically, the
tires in question were inadvertently
manufactured with ‘‘Tread Plies: 2
Polyester + 2 polyamide + 2 steel;
Sidewall plies: 2 polyester’’ marked on
the intended outboard sidewall. The
labeling should have been ‘‘Tread Plies:
2 Polyester + 1 polyamide + 2 steel;
Sidewall plies: 2 polyester’’ (emphasis
added). Michelin also explains that the
marking on the other sidewall of the
tires correctly describes the plies in the
tread area of the tires.
Michelin states that it discovered the
mold labeling error that caused the noncompliance during a routine quality
audit.
Michelin argues that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety because the
noncompliant sidewall marking does
not affect the strength of the tires and all
other labeling requirements have been
met.
Michelin points out that NHTSA has
previously granted petitions for sidewall
marking noncompliances that Michelin
believes are similar to the instant
noncompliance.
Michelin also stated that it has
corrected the problem that caused these
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17827-17828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7874]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2008-0213; Notice 2]
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), has determined that
certain passenger car tires manufactured during the period January 25,
2007, through July 24, 2008, do not fully comply with paragraph S5.5(e)
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) No. 139, New
Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. Goodyear has filed an
appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, Goodyear has
petitioned for an exemption from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Notice of
receipt of the petition was published, with a 30-day public comment
period, on January 13, 2009, in the Federal Register (74 FR 1760). No
comments were received. To view the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System Web site at:
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov/ then follow the online search
instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2008-0213.''
For further information on this decision, contact Mr. George
Gillespie, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5299,
facsimile (202) 366-7002.
Affected are approximately 9,864 size 245/45R17 95H Fierce HP brand
passenger car tires manufactured during the period January 25, 2007,
through July 24, 2008.
Paragraph S5.5(e) of FMVSS No. 139 requires in pertinent part:
S5.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in paragraphs (a)
through (i) of S5.5, each tire must be marked on each sidewall with
the information specified in S5.5(a) through (d) and on one sidewall
with the information specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this standard. The markings
must be placed between the maximum section width and the bead on at
least one sidewall, unless the maximum section width of the tire is
located in an area that is not more than one-fourth of the distance
from the bead to the shoulder of the tire. If the maximum section
width falls within that area, those markings must appear between the
bead and a point one-half the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire, on at least one sidewall. The markings must be in
letters and numerals not less than 0.078 inches high and raised
above or sunk below the tire surface not less than 0.015 inches * *
*
(e) The generic name of each cord material used in the plies
(both sidewall and tread area) of the tire; * * *
Goodyear explains that the noncompliance is that the sidewall
marking incorrectly identifies the generic material of the plies in the
body of the tire as Nylon when they are in fact polyester.
Specifically, the tires in question were inadvertently manufactured
with ``Tread: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel Cords + 1 Nylon Cord. The labeling
should have been ``Tread: 1 Polyester Cord + 2 Steel Cords + 1
Polyester Cord'' (emphasis added).
Goodyear states that it discovered the mold labeling error that
caused the non-compliance during a routine quality audit.
Goodyear argues that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety because the tires meet or exceed all applicable Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety performance standards. All of the markings related
to tire service (load capacity, corresponding inflation pressure, etc.)
are correct. The mislabeling of these tires creates no unsafe
condition.
Goodyear states that the affected tire molds have been modified and
all future production will have the correct material information shown
on the sidewall.
[[Page 17828]]
Goodyear also points out that NHTSA has previously granted
petitions for sidewall marking noncompliances that it believes are
similar to the present noncompliance.
In summation, Goodyear states that it believes that because the
noncompliances are inconsequential to motor vehicle safety that no
corrective action is warranted.
NHTSA Decision
The agency agrees with Goodyear that the noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. The agency believes that the
true measure of inconsequentiality to motor vehicle safety in this case
is that there is no effect of the noncompliance on the operational
safety of vehicles on which these tires are mounted. The safety of
people working in the tire retread, repair, and recycling industries
must also be considered. Although tire construction affects the
strength and durability, neither the agency nor the tire industry
provides information relating tire strength and durability to the
number of plies and types of ply cord material in the tread and
sidewall. Therefore, tire dealers and customers should consider the
tire construction information along with other information such as the
load capacity, maximum inflation pressure, and tread wear, temperature,
and traction ratings, to assess performance capabilities of various
tires. In the agency's judgment, the incorrect labeling of the tire
construction information will have an inconsequential effect on motor
vehicle safety because most consumers do not base tire purchases or
vehicle operation parameters on the ply material in a tire.
The agency also believes the noncompliance will have no measurable
effect on the safety of the tire retread, repair, and recycling
industries. The use of steel cord construction in the sidewall and
tread is the primary safety concern of these industries. In this case,
since the tire sidewalls are marked correctly for the number of steel
plies, this potential safety concern does not exist.
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that Goodyear
has met its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 139
labeling noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, Goodyear's petition is granted and the petitioner is
exempted from the obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy
for, the subject noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: April 1, 2010.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2010-7874 Filed 4-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P