Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, 16895-16896 [2010-7396]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Notices
industry’s cost of capital for 2009. The
decision solicits comments on the
following narrow issues: (1) The
railroads’ 2009 current cost of debt
capital; (2) the railroads’ 2009 current
cost of preferred equity capital (if any);
(3) the railroads’ 2009 cost of common
equity capital; (4) how the change in
BNSF Railway Company’s (BNSF’s)
share prices from November 2009
through December 2009, following the
announcement of BNSF’s acquisition by
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., should be
considered in calculating the 2009 cost
of common equity capital; and (5) the
2009 capital structure mix of the
railroad industry on a market value
basis. Comments should focus on the
various cost of capital components
listed above using the same
methodology followed in Railroad Cost
of Capital—2008, Ex Parte No. 558 (SubNo. 12) (STB served Sept. 25, 2009).
DATES: Notices of intent to participate
are due by April 16, 2010. Statements of
the railroads are due by May 17, 2010.
Statements of other interested persons
are due by June 15, 2010. Rebuttal
statements by the railroads are due by
July 15, 2010.
Comments may be
submitted either via the Board’s e-filing
system or in the traditional paper
format. Any person using e-filing should
comply with the instructions at the E–
FILING link on the Board’s Web site, at
https://www.stb.dot.gov. Any person
submitting a filing in the traditional
paper format should send an original
and 10 copies to: Surface Transportation
Board, Attn: STB Ex Parte No. 558 (SubNo. 13), 395 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245–0333.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.]
The
Board’s decision is posted on the
Board’s Web site, https://
www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision
may be purchased by contacting the
Board’s Office of Public Assistance,
Governmental Affairs, and Compliance
at (202) 245–0235. Assistance for the
hearing impaired is available through
FIRS at 1–800–877–8339.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10704(a).
Decided: March 29, 2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:40 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner
Nottingham.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010–7411 Filed 4–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (NHTSA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection
and the expected burden. The Federal
Register notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on June 22, 2009.
This is a request for a new collection.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before May 3, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments within 30
days to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention: NHTSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Mary Versailles, Office of Rulemaking,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: (202) 366–0846.
For legal issues: Ms. Sarah Alves,
Office of the Chief Counsel, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: (202) 366–2992.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the procedures established by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
by a Federal agency unless the
collection displays a valid OMB control
number. The final rule establishes a new
consumer information program at 49
CFR Part 575.106, Tire fuel efficiency
consumer information program. Tire
manufacturers would provide data to
NHTSA under a reporting requirement.
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16895
For this new regulation, NHTSA is
submitting to OMB a request for
approval of the following collection of
information.
In compliance with the PRA, this
notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to OMB for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collections
and their expected burden. This is a
request for a new collection.
Agency: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Title: 49 CFR Part 575.106, Tire fuel
efficiency consumer information
program.
Type of Request: New collection.
OMB Clearance Number: Not
assigned.
Form Number: The collection of this
information will not use any standard
forms.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three years from the date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information
NHTSA is adding a new requirement
in Part 575 which would require tire
manufacturers and tire brand name
owners to rate all replacement passenger
car tires for fuel efficiency (i.e., rolling
resistance), safety (i.e., wet traction),
and durability (i.e., treadwear), and
submit reports to NHTSA regarding the
ratings. The ratings for safety and
durability are based on test procedures
specified under the UTQGS traction and
treadwear ratings requirements. This
information would be used by
consumers of replacement passenger car
tires to compare tire fuel efficiency
across different tires and examine any
tradeoffs between fuel efficiency (i.e.,
rolling resistance), safety (i.e., wet
traction), and durability (i.e., treadwear)
in making their purchase decisions.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Use of the Information
NHTSA needs the information to
provide consumers information to allow
them to compare tire fuel efficiency
across different tires and examine any
tradeoffs between fuel efficiency (i.e.,
rolling resistance), safety (i.e., wet
traction), and durability (i.e., treadwear)
in making their purchase decisions.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)
There are approximately 28
manufacturers of replacement tires sold
in the United States who would be
required to report annually.
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
16896
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Notices
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting
and Recordkeeping Burden Resulting
from the Collection of Information
NHTSA estimates that there are 28
tire manufacturers that will be required
to report. Each of these will need to set
up the software in a computer program
to combine the testing information,
organize it for NHTSA’s use, etc. We
estimate this cost to be a one-time
charge of about $10,000 per company.
Based on the costs used in the Early
Warning Reporting Regulation analysis,1
we estimate the annual cost per report
per tire manufacturer to be $287. There
are also computer maintenance costs of
keeping the data up to date, etc. as tests
come in throughout the year. In the
EWR analysis, we estimated costs of
$3,755 per year per company. Thus, the
total annual cost is estimated to be
$4,042 per company. Thus the total
costs would be $280,000 + $113,176 =
$393,176 for the first year and $113,176
as an annual cost for the 28 tire
manufacturers.
The largest portion of the cost burden
imposed by the tire fuel efficiency
program arises from the testing
necessary to determine the ratings that
should be assigned to the tires. As
detailed in our reponse to question #8,
our revised per-SKU costs to test for
rolling resistance, traction, and
treadwear amount to $2,040 (i.e. $540 +
$500 + $1,000). This would result in
testing costs of $38,760,000 in the first
year (19,000 SKUs) and $6,573,000 in
subsequent years (3,222 new SKUs
annually).
The estimated annual cost to the
Federal government is $1.28 million.
This cost includes $730,000 for
enforcement testing, and about $550,000
annually to set up and keep up to date
a website that includes the information
reported to NHTSA.
Comments are invited on:
• Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility.
• Whether the Department’s estimate
for the burden of the information
collection is accurate.
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
1 Preliminary Regulatory Evaluation, Tread Act
Amendments to Early Warning Reporting
Regulation Part 579 and Defect and Noncompliance
Part 573, August 2008 (Docket No. 2008–0169–
0007.1).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:40 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
Issued on: March 29, 2010.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010–7396 Filed 4–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA 2010–0005–N–7]
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
its implementing regulations, the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking
renewal of the following currently
approved information collection
activities. Before submitting these
information collection requirements for
clearance by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting
public comment on specific aspects of
the activities identified below.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on any or all of the following proposed
activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert
Brogan, Office of Safety, Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 17,
Washington, DC 20590, or Ms. Kimberly
Toone, Office of Information
Technology, RAD–20, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC
20590. Commenters requesting FRA to
acknowledge receipt of their respective
comments must include a self-addressed
stamped postcard stating, ‘‘Comments
on OMB control number lll.’’
Alternatively, comments may be
transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493–
6216 or (202) 493–6497, or via e-mail to
Mr. Brogan at robert.brogan@dot.gov, or
to Ms. Toone at kim.toone@dot.gov.
Please refer to the assigned OMB control
number in any correspondence
submitted. FRA will summarize
comments received in response to this
notice in a subsequent notice and
include them in its information
collection submission to OMB for
approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00178
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 17,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202)
493–6292) or Ms. Kimberly Toone,
Office of Information Technology, RAD–
20, Federal Railroad Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop
35, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:
(202) 493–6132). (These telephone
numbers are not toll-free.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13, § 2, 109 Stat.
163 (1995) (codified as revised at 44
U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR Part
1320, require Federal agencies to
provide 60-days notice to the public for
comment on information collection
activities before seeking approval for
reinstatement or renewal by OMB. 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1),
1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically,
FRA invites interested respondents to
comment on the following summary of
proposed information collection
activities regarding (i) whether the
information collection activities are
necessary for FRA to properly execute
its functions, including whether the
activities will have practical utility; (ii)
the accuracy of FRA’s estimates of the
burden of the information collection
activities, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used to
determine the estimates; (iii) ways for
FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information being
collected; and (iv) ways for FRA to
minimize the burden of information
collection activities on the public by
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)(i)–(iv); 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1)(i)–(iv). FRA believes that
soliciting public comment will promote
its efforts to reduce the administrative
and paperwork burdens associated with
the collection of information mandated
by Federal regulations. In summary,
FRA reasons that comments received
will advance three objectives: (i) Reduce
reporting burdens; (ii) ensure that it
organizes information collection
requirements in a ‘‘user friendly’’ format
to improve the use of such information;
and (iii) accurately assess the resources
expended to retrieve and produce
information requested. See 44 U.S.C.
3501.
Below are brief summaries of eight
currently approved information
collection activities that FRA will
submit for clearance by OMB as
required under the PRA:
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 63 (Friday, April 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16895-16896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7396]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency
Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (NHTSA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collection and the expected
burden. The Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on June 22, 2009. This is a request for a new collection.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 3, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments within 30 days to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: NHTSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary Versailles, Office of
Rulemaking, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-0846.
For legal issues: Ms. Sarah Alves, Office of the Chief Counsel,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: (202) 366-2992.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA), a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information by a Federal agency unless the collection displays a valid
OMB control number. The final rule establishes a new consumer
information program at 49 CFR Part 575.106, Tire fuel efficiency
consumer information program. Tire manufacturers would provide data to
NHTSA under a reporting requirement. For this new regulation, NHTSA is
submitting to OMB a request for approval of the following collection of
information.
In compliance with the PRA, this notice announces that the
Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been
forwarded to OMB for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature
of the information collections and their expected burden. This is a
request for a new collection.
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Title: 49 CFR Part 575.106, Tire fuel efficiency consumer
information program.
Type of Request: New collection.
OMB Clearance Number: Not assigned.
Form Number: The collection of this information will not use any
standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information
NHTSA is adding a new requirement in Part 575 which would require
tire manufacturers and tire brand name owners to rate all replacement
passenger car tires for fuel efficiency (i.e., rolling resistance),
safety (i.e., wet traction), and durability (i.e., treadwear), and
submit reports to NHTSA regarding the ratings. The ratings for safety
and durability are based on test procedures specified under the UTQGS
traction and treadwear ratings requirements. This information would be
used by consumers of replacement passenger car tires to compare tire
fuel efficiency across different tires and examine any tradeoffs
between fuel efficiency (i.e., rolling resistance), safety (i.e., wet
traction), and durability (i.e., treadwear) in making their purchase
decisions.
Description of the Need for the Information and Use of the Information
NHTSA needs the information to provide consumers information to
allow them to compare tire fuel efficiency across different tires and
examine any tradeoffs between fuel efficiency (i.e., rolling
resistance), safety (i.e., wet traction), and durability (i.e.,
treadwear) in making their purchase decisions.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)
There are approximately 28 manufacturers of replacement tires sold
in the United States who would be required to report annually.
[[Page 16896]]
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information
NHTSA estimates that there are 28 tire manufacturers that will be
required to report. Each of these will need to set up the software in a
computer program to combine the testing information, organize it for
NHTSA's use, etc. We estimate this cost to be a one-time charge of
about $10,000 per company. Based on the costs used in the Early Warning
Reporting Regulation analysis,\1\ we estimate the annual cost per
report per tire manufacturer to be $287. There are also computer
maintenance costs of keeping the data up to date, etc. as tests come in
throughout the year. In the EWR analysis, we estimated costs of $3,755
per year per company. Thus, the total annual cost is estimated to be
$4,042 per company. Thus the total costs would be $280,000 + $113,176 =
$393,176 for the first year and $113,176 as an annual cost for the 28
tire manufacturers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Preliminary Regulatory Evaluation, Tread Act Amendments to
Early Warning Reporting Regulation Part 579 and Defect and
Noncompliance Part 573, August 2008 (Docket No. 2008-0169-0007.1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The largest portion of the cost burden imposed by the tire fuel
efficiency program arises from the testing necessary to determine the
ratings that should be assigned to the tires. As detailed in our
reponse to question 8, our revised per-SKU costs to test for
rolling resistance, traction, and treadwear amount to $2,040 (i.e. $540
+ $500 + $1,000). This would result in testing costs of $38,760,000 in
the first year (19,000 SKUs) and $6,573,000 in subsequent years (3,222
new SKUs annually).
The estimated annual cost to the Federal government is $1.28
million. This cost includes $730,000 for enforcement testing, and about
$550,000 annually to set up and keep up to date a website that includes
the information reported to NHTSA.
Comments are invited on:
Whether the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have practical utility.
Whether the Department's estimate for the burden of the
information collection is accurate.
Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
Issued on: March 29, 2010.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-7396 Filed 4-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P