Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products From Brazil, Japan, and Russia, 16504-16507 [2010-6623]
Download as PDF
16504
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
[CO200–LLCOF00000–L07770900–XZ0000–
241A00]
establishing the 2010 Front Range RAC
meeting schedule.
This meeting is open to the public.
The public is encouraged to make oral
comments to the Council at 9:30 a.m. or
written statements may be submitted for
the Council’s consideration. Depending
on the number of persons wishing to
comment and time available, the time
for individual oral comments may be
limited. Summary minutes for the
Council Meeting will be maintained in
the Royal Gorge Field Office and will be
available for public inspection and
reproduction during regular business
hours within thirty (30) days following
the meeting. Meeting minutes and
agenda (10 days prior to each meeting)
are also available at: https://
www.blm.gov/rac/co/frrac/co_fr.htm.
Notice of Meeting, Front Range
Resource Advisory Council
Dated: March 26, 2010.
Anna Marie Burden,
Acting State Director.
Indian Reservation, Oregon may
proceed after that date if no additional
claimants come forward.
The Northwest Museum, Whitman
College is responsible for notifying the
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla
Indian Reservation, Oregon that this
notice has been published.
Dated: March 16, 2010
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2010–7252 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Timothy B. Reuwsaat,
District Manager, Medford District Office.
[FR Doc. 2010–7376 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[FR Doc. 2010–7287 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
at 9:30 a.m. on April 21, 2010 at the
meeting location. Those who verbally
address the Medford RAC are asked to
provide a written statement of their
comments or presentation. Unless
otherwise approved by the RAC Chair,
the public comment period will last no
longer than 30 minutes, and each
speaker may address the RAC for a
maximum of three minutes. If
reasonable accommodation is required,
please contact the BLM’s Medford
District Public Affairs Officer at 541–
618–2220 as soon as possible.
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Front Range
Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will
meet as indicated below.
DATES: The meeting will be held April
20, 2010 from 9:15 a.m. to 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: BLM Royal Gorge Field
˜
Office, 3028 East Main Street, Canon
City, Colorado 81212.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cass
Cairns, Front Range RAC Coordinator,
BLM Royal Gorge Field Office, 3028 E.
˜
Main St., Canon City, CO 81212. Phone:
(719) 269–8553. E-mail:
ccairns@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15member Council advises the Secretary
of the Interior, through the Bureau of
Land Management, on a variety of
planning and management issues
associated with public land
management in the BLM Front Range
District, which includes the Royal Gorge
Field Office and the San Luis Valley
Public Lands Center, Colorado. Planned
agenda topics include: Arkansas River
Travel Management Plan Supplemental
Rules process; BLM Renewable Energy
Team; 2010 Spring and Fall Prescribed
Burn Program, and the 2010 Fire Season
Outlook; Manager updates on current
land management issues that include;
Park Center Well; American Recovery
Reinvestment Act projects update;
status of Over The River draft
Environmental Impact Statement; and
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–384 and 731–
TA–806–808 (Second Review)]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
Bureau of Land Management
[L58820000.PH0000.LXRSMA990000; HAG
10–0198]
Meeting Notice for the Medford District
Resource Advisory Council
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Meeting notice for the Medford
District Resource Advisory Council.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, the
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) Medford
District Resource Advisory Council
(Medford RAC) will meet as indicated
below:
DATES: The Medford RAC meeting will
begin 8:30 a.m. PDT on April 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The Medford RAC will meet
at the Medford Interagency Office, 3040
Biddle Road in Medford, Oregon.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Whittington, Medford District Public
Affairs Officer, 3040 Biddle Road,
Medford, OR 97504 or via phone at 541–
618–2220 or via electronic mail at
jim_whittington@blm.gov.
The
meeting agenda includes decisions on
Title II project submissions and other
matters as may reasonably come before
the council. The public is welcome to
attend all portions of the meeting and
may make oral comments to the Council
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality
Steel Products From Brazil, Japan, and
Russia
AGENCY: United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews
concerning the countervailing duty
order on certain hot-rolled flat-rolled
carbon-quality steel products (‘‘hotrolled steel’’) from Brazil, the
antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled
steel from Brazil and Japan, and the
suspended investigation on hot-rolled
steel from Russia.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
countervailing duty order on hot-rolled
steel from Brazil, the antidumping duty
orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil
and Japan, and the suspended
investigation on hot-rolled steel from
Russia would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of
the Act, interested parties are requested
to respond to this notice by submitting
the information specified below to the
Commission; 1 to be assured of
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 10–5–212,
expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
consideration, the deadline for
responses is May 3, 2010. Comments on
the adequacy of responses may be filed
with the Commission by June 14, 2010.
For further information concerning the
conduct of these reviews and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207), as most recently amended at 74 FR
2847 (January 16, 2009).
DATES: Effective Date: April 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On June 29, 1999, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’)
issued an antidumping duty order on
imports of hot-rolled steel from Japan
(64 FR 34778). Effective July 6, 1999,
Commerce suspended the antidumping
and countervailing duty investigations
on such imports from Brazil (64 FR
38792 and 38797, July 19, 1999). Note:
I switched the order here because the
AD suspension is the one cited first.
and, effective July 12, 1999, Commerce
suspended the antidumping duty
investigation on such imports from
Russia (64 FR 38642, July 19, 1999).
After terminating the suspension
agreement with respect to the
antidumping duty investigation on
imports of hot-rolled steel from Brazil
(67 FR 6226, February 11, 2002),
Commerce issued an antidumping duty
order on such imports (67 FR 11093,
March 12, 2002). Effective September
26, 2004, Commerce terminated the
suspension agreement with respect to
the countervailing duty investigation on
imports of hot-rolled steel from Brazil
and issued a countervailing duty order
on such imports (69 FR 56040,
September 17, 2004). Following fiveyear reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective May 12, 2005,
Commerce issued a continuation of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
countervailing duty order on hot-rolled
steel from Brazil (70 FR 30417, May 26,
2005), the antidumping duty orders on
hot-rolled steel from Brazil and Japan
(70 FR 30413, May 26, 2005), and the
suspended investigation on imports of
hot-rolled steel from Russia (70 FR
32571, June 3, 2005). The Commission
is now conducting second reviews to
determine whether revocation of the
orders and termination of the suspended
investigation would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to the domestic industry within
a reasonably foreseeable time. It will
assess the adequacy of interested party
responses to this notice of institution to
determine whether to conduct full or
expedited reviews. The Commission’s
determinations in any expedited
reviews will be based on the facts
available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions. The following definitions
apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year reviews, as
defined by Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these
reviews are Brazil, Japan, and Russia.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original and
full five-year review determinations, the
Commission found one Domestic Like
Product consisting of all hot-rolled steel,
as defined in Commerce’s scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original and full five-year
review determinations, the Commission
defined the Domestic Industry as all
producers of hot-rolled steel.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list. Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16505
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they
may appear in a review even if they
participated personally and
substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation. The
Commission’s designated agency ethics
official has advised that a five-year
review is not considered the ‘‘same
particular matter’’ as the corresponding
underlying original investigation for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post
employment statute for Federal
employees, and Commission rule
201.15(b)(19 CFR 201.15(b)), 73 FR
24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was
developed in consultation with the
Office of Government Ethics.
Consequently, former employees are not
required to seek Commission approval
to appear in a review under Commission
rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the
corresponding underlying original
investigation was pending when they
were Commission employees. For
further ethics advice on this matter,
contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy
Agency Ethics Official, at 202–205–
3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list. Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in these reviews available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the reviews. A
separate service list will be maintained
by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the
APO.
Certification. Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with these
reviews must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
will be deemed to consent, unless
otherwise specified, for the
Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the
information provided in any other
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
16506
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
reviews or investigations of the same or
comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
and operations of the Commission
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions. Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is May 3, 2010. Pursuant
to section 207.62(b) of the Commission’s
rules, eligible parties (as specified in
Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also
file comments concerning the adequacy
of responses to the notice of institution
and whether the Commission should
conduct expedited or full reviews. The
deadline for filing such comments is
June 14, 2010. All written submissions
must conform with the provisions of
sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the
Commission’s rules and any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in
accordance with sections 201.16(c) and
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews
must be served on all other parties to
the reviews (as identified by either the
public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the reviews you do not
need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested
information. Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information To Be Provided in
Response to This Notice of Institution: If
you are a domestic producer, union/
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
worker group, or trade/business
association; import/export Subject
Merchandise from more than one
Subject Country; or produce Subject
Merchandise in more than one Subject
Country, you may file a single response.
If you do so, please ensure that your
response to each question includes the
information requested for each pertinent
Subject Country. As used below, the
term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address) and name, telephone number,
fax number, and E-mail address of the
certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of
the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union
or worker group, a U.S. importer of the
Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer
or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business
association, or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in these reviews by providing
information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders and the
termination of the suspended
investigation on the Domestic Industry
in general and/or your firm/entity
specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in
section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of
subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of
imports of Subject Merchandise on the
Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in each Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries after
2004.
(7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in
the U.S. market for the Domestic Like
Product and the Subject Merchandise
(including street address, World Wide
Web address, and the name, telephone
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
number, fax number, and E-mail address
of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of
information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or
the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or
other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during
calendar year 2009, except as noted
(report quantity data in short tons and
value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant).
If you are a union/worker group or
trade/business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms in which your workers are
employed/which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Domestic Like Product (i.e.,
the level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have
expected to attain during the year,
assuming normal operating conditions
(using equipment and machinery in
place and ready to operate), normal
operating levels (hours per week/weeks
per year), time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a
typical or representative product mix);
(c) the quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s); and
(d) the quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost
of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit,
(iv) selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating
income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include
both U.S. and export commercial sales,
internal consumption, and company
transfers) for your most recently
completed fiscal year (identify the date
on which your fiscal year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country(ies), provide
the following information on your
firm’s(s’) operations on that product
during calendar year 2009 (report
quantity data in short tons and value
data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties)
of U.S. imports and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total U.S.
imports of Subject Merchandise from
each Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping and/or
countervailing duties) of U.S.
commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from each
Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping and/or
countervailing duties) of U.S. internal
consumption/company transfers of
Subject Merchandise imported from
each Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following
information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2009 (report quantity data
in short tons and value data in U.S.
dollars, landed and duty-paid at the
U.S. port but not including antidumping
or countervailing duties). If you are a
trade/business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in each Subject Country accounted for
by your firm’s(s’) production; and
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Subject Merchandise in
each Subject Country (i.e., the level of
production that your establishment(s)
could reasonably have expected to
attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment
and machinery in place and ready to
operate), normal operating levels (hours
per week/weeks per year), time for
downtime, maintenance, repair, and
cleanup, and a typical or representative
product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from each Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country(ies) after 2004, and
significant changes, if any, that are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
Country(ies), and such merchandise
from other countries.
(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
Issued: March 19, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–6623 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–661]
In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor
Chips Having Synchronous Dynamic
Random Access Memory Controllers
and Products Containing Same; Notice
of Commission Determination To
Review in Part an Initial Determination
Finding Respondents in Violation of
Section 337; Denial of Respondents’
Joint Motion To Extend Target Date;
Schedule for Briefing on the Issues on
Review and on Remedy, Public
Interest, and Bonding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review
in part the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) Initial Determination on
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16507
Violation of Section 337 (‘‘ID’’) and
Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bond finding that
Respondents violated section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 by importation into
the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the
United States after importation, of
certain semiconductor chips having
synchronous dynamic random access
memory controllers and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more claims of
U.S. Patent Nos. 6,470,405 (‘‘the ’405
patent’’), 6,591,353 (‘‘the ’353 patent’’),
and 7,287,109 (‘‘the ’109 patent’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
M. Bartkowski, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5432. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted Inv. No. 337–
TA–661 on December 10, 2008, based
on a complaint filed by Rambus, Inc. of
Los Altos, California (‘‘Rambus’’). 73 FR
75131–2. The complaint, as amended
and supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
337’’), in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain electronic devices
by reason of infringement of certain
claims of the ’353 patent, the ’405
patent, the ’109 patent, as well as
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
7,117,998 (‘‘the ’998 patent); 7,210,016
(‘‘the ’016 patent’’); 7,287,119 (‘‘the ’119
patent’’); 7,330,952 (‘‘the ’952 patent’’);
7,330,953 (‘‘the ’953 patent’’); and
7,360,050 (‘‘the ’050 patent’’). The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named the following respondents:
NVIDIA Corporation of Santa Clara,
California; Asustek Computer, Inc. of
Taipei, Taiwan; ASUS Computer
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 62 (Thursday, April 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16504-16507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6623]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-384 and 731-TA-806-808 (Second Review)]
Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products From Brazil,
Japan, and Russia
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews concerning the countervailing
duty order on certain hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon-quality steel
products (``hot-rolled steel'') from Brazil, the antidumping duty
orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil and Japan, and the suspended
investigation on hot-rolled steel from Russia.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted
reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the
countervailing duty order on hot-rolled steel from Brazil, the
antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil and Japan, and
the suspended investigation on hot-rolled steel from Russia would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are
requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission; \1\ to be assured of
[[Page 16505]]
consideration, the deadline for responses is May 3, 2010. Comments on
the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by June 14,
2010. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews
and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207), as most
recently amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 10-5-212,
expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send
comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: April 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On June 29, 1999, the Department of Commerce
(``Commerce'') issued an antidumping duty order on imports of hot-
rolled steel from Japan (64 FR 34778). Effective July 6, 1999, Commerce
suspended the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on
such imports from Brazil (64 FR 38792 and 38797, July 19, 1999). Note:
I switched the order here because the AD suspension is the one cited
first. and, effective July 12, 1999, Commerce suspended the antidumping
duty investigation on such imports from Russia (64 FR 38642, July 19,
1999). After terminating the suspension agreement with respect to the
antidumping duty investigation on imports of hot-rolled steel from
Brazil (67 FR 6226, February 11, 2002), Commerce issued an antidumping
duty order on such imports (67 FR 11093, March 12, 2002). Effective
September 26, 2004, Commerce terminated the suspension agreement with
respect to the countervailing duty investigation on imports of hot-
rolled steel from Brazil and issued a countervailing duty order on such
imports (69 FR 56040, September 17, 2004). Following five-year reviews
by Commerce and the Commission, effective May 12, 2005, Commerce issued
a continuation of the countervailing duty order on hot-rolled steel
from Brazil (70 FR 30417, May 26, 2005), the antidumping duty orders on
hot-rolled steel from Brazil and Japan (70 FR 30413, May 26, 2005), and
the suspended investigation on imports of hot-rolled steel from Russia
(70 FR 32571, June 3, 2005). The Commission is now conducting second
reviews to determine whether revocation of the orders and termination
of the suspended investigation would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a
reasonably foreseeable time. It will assess the adequacy of interested
party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to
conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission's determinations in
any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may
include information provided in response to this notice.
Definitions. The following definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Brazil, Japan, and
Russia.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original
and full five-year review determinations, the Commission found one
Domestic Like Product consisting of all hot-rolled steel, as defined in
Commerce's scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original and full five-year
review determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as
all producers of hot-rolled steel.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the reviews and public service list. Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the reviews as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if
they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation. The Commission's designated agency
ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not considered
the ``same particular matter'' as the corresponding underlying original
investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment
statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b)(19 CFR
201.15(b)), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was developed in
consultation with the Office of Government Ethics. Consequently, former
employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a
review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding
underlying original investigation was pending when they were Commission
employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Carol
McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official, at 202-205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list. Pursuant
to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make
BPI submitted in these reviews available to authorized applicants under
the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made no
later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as
defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A
separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification. Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's rules,
any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with
these reviews must certify that the information is accurate and
complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In making the
certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent, unless
otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and contract
personnel to use the information provided in any other
[[Page 16506]]
reviews or investigations of the same or comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits
and investigations relating to the programs and operations of the
Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions. Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's
rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the
information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is
May 3, 2010. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the Commission's rules,
eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may
also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice
of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or
full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is June 14, 2010.
All written submissions must conform with the provisions of sections
201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission's rules and any submissions that
contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6
and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or
electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002).
Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the
Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must
be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either
the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of
service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the
reviews you do not need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested information. Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of
Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/worker group, or
trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more
than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than
one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so,
please ensure that your response to each question includes the
information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used
below, the term ``firm'' includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and E-mail
address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S.
producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a
U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or
business association, or another interested party (including an
explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or
which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in these reviews by providing information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping and countervailing duty orders and the termination of the
suspended investigation on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your
firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various
factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a))
including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on
the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in
each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 2004.
(7) A list of 3-5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the
Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street
address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax
number, and E-mail address of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the
U.S. or other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during calendar year 2009, except as noted (report quantity
data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If
you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers
are employed/which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like
Product (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could
reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready
to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year),
time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or
representative product mix);
(c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS),
(iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial
sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most
recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal
year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during calendar year 2009 (report quantity
data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms which are members of your association.
[[Page 16507]]
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise
from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country(ies), provide the following information on your
firm's(s') operations on that product during calendar year 2009 (report
quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and
duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or
countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are
members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production; and
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Subject
Merchandise in each Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that
your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during
the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and
machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels
(hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance,
repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country(ies) after 2004, and significant
changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology;
production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production facilities used for other products
and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production);
and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different
national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets
or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of
substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic
Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise
produced in the Subject Country(ies), and such merchandise from other
countries.
(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: March 19, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-6623 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P