Comment Request for Information Collection for Quick Turnaround Surveys of the Workforce Investment Act (Extension Without Revisions), 15726-15728 [2010-6997]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
15726
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1088
(Preliminary) (Remand)]
Polyvinyl Alcohol From Taiwan;
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigation, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)) (the Act), that there
is a reasonable indication that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
from Taiwan of polyvinyl alcohol
provided for in subheading 3905.30.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that are alleged to be
sold in the United States at less than fair
value (LTFV).2
Commencement of Final Phase of
Investigation
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigation.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) of an affirmative
preliminary determination in the
investigation under section 733(b) of the
Act, or, if the preliminary determination
is negative, upon notice of an
affirmative final determination in that
investigation under section 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigation need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigation. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping duty
investigations. The Secretary will
prepare a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the investigation.
1 The record is defined in section 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Vice Chairman Pearson and Commissioners
Okun and Lane dissented, having determined that
there is no reasonable indication that an industry
in the United States is materially injured or
threatened with material injury by reason of
allegedly LTFV imports of polyvinyl alcohol from
Taiwan.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Mar 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Background
On September 7, 2004, a petition was
filed with the Commission and
Commerce by domestic producer
Celanese Chemicals, Ltd., Dallas, TX,
alleging that an industry in the United
States is materially injured and
threatened with further material injury
by reason of LTFV imports of polyvinyl
alcohol from Taiwan. Accordingly,
effective September 7, 2004, the
Commission instituted antidumping
duty investigation No. 731–TA–1088
(Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigation and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of September 15, 2004
(69 FR 55653). The conference was held
in Washington, DC, on September 28,
2004, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
On October 24, 2004, the Commission
determined by a vote of 3 to 2, that there
was no reasonable indication that a U.S.
industry was materially injured or
threatened with material injury by
reason of imports of PVA from Taiwan.3
Notice of that determination was
published on October 29, 2004. 69 FR
63177. The Commission transmitted its
determination to the Secretary of
Commerce on October 22, 2004. The
Commission’s views were contained in
USITC Publication 3732 (October 2004),
entitled Polyvinyl Alcohol from Taiwan:
Investigation No. 731–TA–1088
(Preliminary). Domestic producer/
petitioner Celanese appealed the
Commission’s negative preliminary
determination to the U.S. Court of
International Trade (‘‘CIT’’).
On January 29, 2007, the CIT
remanded the determination to the
Commission for further proceedings.
Celanese Chemicals, Ltd. v. United
States, Slip Op. 07–16, 29 ITRD 1985
(Ct. Int’l Trade 2007). On remand, the
Commission determined, by a vote of 3
to 3, that there was a reasonable
indication that a U.S. industry was
materially injured by reason of imports
of subject imports of PVA from Taiwan.
Chairman Aranoff and Commissioners
Williamson and Pinkert, who had
commenced their service as
3 Commissioners Miller and Koplan dissented,
having determined that there was a reasonable
indication that an industry in the United States was
materially injured by reason of allegedly LTFV
imports of polyvinyl alcohol from Taiwan.
Commissioner Hillman did not participate in the
investigation.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commissioners in the intervening time,
voted in the affirmative. On remand,
Vice Chairman Pearson and
Commissioners Okun and Lane
reaffirmed their negative preliminary
determinations. Polyvinyl Alcohol from
Taiwan: Investigation No. 731–TA–1088
(Preliminary) (Remand), USITC
Publication 3920 (April 2007). The tie
vote yielded an affirmative
determination by operation of 19 U.S.C.
1677(11).
On November 19, 2008, the CIT
affirmed the Commission’s affirmative
preliminary determination on remand.
Celanese Chemicals Ltd. v. United
States, Slip Op. 08–125, 30 ITRD 2352
(‘‘Celanese II’’). On January 16, 2009,
DuPont appealed to the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (‘‘Federal
Circuit’’).
On December 23, 2009, the Federal
Circuit affirmed, without opinion, the
CIT’s decision in Celanese II, and issued
its mandate on February 18, 2010. No
party has applied under 28 U.S.C.
2101(c) to the U.S. Supreme Court for a
writ of certiorari. The judicial
proceedings having now ended, the
Commission now publishes notice of its
preliminary determination on remand.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 25, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–7071 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Comment Request for Information
Collection for Quick Turnaround
Surveys of the Workforce Investment
Act (Extension Without Revisions)
AGENCY: Employment and Training
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
collections of information in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
This program helps to ensure that
requested data can be provided in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of the
collection requirements on respondents
can be properly assessed. Currently, the
Employment and Training
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
15727
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Notices
Administration is soliciting comments
concerning the collection of data about
quick turnaround surveys of the
Workforce Investment Act (due to
expire in May 2010).
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the office listed below in
the addressee section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee’s section below on or before
June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to US Department of Labor,
Employment and Training
Administration, Office of Policy
Development and Research, Attention:
Richard Muller, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room N–5641,
Washington, DC 20210. Telephone
number: (202) 693–3680 (this is not a
toll-free number). Fax: (202) 693–2766.
E-mail: muller.richard@dol.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Muller, Employment and
Training Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room N–5637,
Washington, DC 20210; (202) 693–3680
(this is not a toll-free number); e-mail:
Muller.Richard@dol.gov; fax: (202) 693–
2766 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) is soliciting
comments regarding an extension of a
current Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) clearance for a series of
quick turnaround surveys in which data
will be collected from state workforce
agencies and local workforce investment
areas. The surveys will focus on issues
relating to the governance,
administration, funding, service design,
and delivery structure of workforce
programs authorized by the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA). Enacted in 1998,
WIA has sought to redesign the
workforce investment system by linking
over a dozen separately funded Federal
programs, streamlining services, and
establishing new accountability
requirements.
ETA has a continuing need for
information on WIA operations and is
seeking a further extension of the
clearance for conducting a series of 8 to
20 separate surveys over the next three
years. Each survey will be relatively
short (10–30 questions) and, depending
on the nature of the survey, may be
administered to state workforce
agencies, local workforce boards, OneStop Career Centers, employment
service offices, or other local-area WIA
partners. Each survey will be designed
on an ad hoc basis and will focus on
emerging topics of pressing policy
interest. Each survey will either cover
the universe of respondents (for state
level information) or a properly drawn
random sample (for local level
information). Examples of broad topic
areas include:
• Local management information
system developments.
• New processes and procedures.
• Services to different target groups.
• Integration and coordination with
other programs.
• Local workforce investment board
membership and training.
Quick turnaround surveys are needed
for a number of reasons. The most
pressing concerns the need to
understand key operational issues in
light of challenges deriving from the
Administration’s policy priorities and
from the upcoming reauthorization of
WIA and of other partner programs.
Timely information, that identifies the
scope and magnitude of various
practices or problems, is needed for
ETA to fulfill its obligations to develop
high quality policy, administrative
guidance, regulations, and technical
assistance.
The data that will be requested in the
quick turnaround surveys is not
otherwise available. Other research and
evaluation efforts, including case
studies or long-range evaluations, either
cover only a limited number of sites or
take many years for data to be gathered
and analyzed. Administrative
information and data are too limited:
The five-year Workforce Investment
Plans, developed by states and local
areas, are too general in nature to meet
ETA’s specific informational needs.
Quarterly or annual data reported by
states and local areas do not provide
information on key operational practices
and issues. Thus, ETA has no
alternative mechanism for collecting
information that both identifies the
scope and magnitude of emerging WIA
implementation issues and provides the
Sample Size
Lower-Bound ............................................
Upper-Bound ............................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Mar 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
54
250
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Average time
per question
(minutes)
Number of
questions
10
30
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information on a quick turnaround
basis.
ETA will make every effort to
coordinate the quick turnaround
surveys with other research it is
conducting, in order to ease the burden
on local and state respondents, to avoid
duplication, and to fully explore how
interim data and information from each
study can be used to inform other
studies. Information from the quick
response surveys will complement but
not duplicate other ETA reporting
requirements or evaluation studies.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is
particularly interested in comments
which:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
III. Current Actions
Type of Review: Extension without
changes.
Agency: Employment and Training
Administration.
Title: Quick Turnaround Surveys of
WIA.
OMB Number: 1205–0436.
Affected Public: State and local
workforce agencies and workforce
investment boards, and WIA partner
program agencies at the state and local
levels.
Total Respondents: Varies by survey,
from 54 to 250 respondents per survey,
for up to 20 surveys. See Summary
Burden chart below:
Aggregate
burden hours
per survey
(hours)
1
3
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
9
375
30MRN1
Estimated
number of
surveys
8
20
Total annual
burden hours
72
7,500
15728
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Notices
Total Burden Cost for capital and
startup: $0.
Total Burden Cost for operation and
maintenance: $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for OMB approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
Dated: March 24, 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–6997 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Office of Apprenticeship and the
Women’s Bureau; Notice of Availability
of Funds and Solicitation for Grant
Applications for Women in
Apprenticeship and Nontraditional
Occupations (WANTO) Grants
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
Announcement Type: Notice of
Solicitation for Grant Announcement
(SGA).
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/
DFA–PY–09–03.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 17.201.
SUMMARY: The Women’s Bureau (WB)
and the Employment and Training
Administration’s (ETA) Office of
Apprenticeship (OA), U.S. Department
of Labor (DOL or Department),
announce the availability of
approximately $1,800,000 to establish a
grant program for the purpose of
assisting employers and labor
management organizations in the
placement and retention of women in
apprenticeship and nontraditional
occupations as defined in Section
VIII.F., Acronyms and Definitions. This
Program Year (PY) 2009 and 2010 SGA
is authorized under the WANTO Act of
1992, Public Law 102–530, 29 USC 2501
et seq. To that end, the OA and WB plan
to disburse PY 2009 and 2010 WANTO
grant funds to six community-based
organization (CBO)/registered
apprenticeship program (RAP) consortia
to conduct innovative projects to
improve outreach, recruitment, hiring,
training, employment, and retention of
women in apprenticeships in the
nontraditional occupations, as defined
in Section VIII.F. This SGA focuses
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Mar 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
upon recruitment, training, placement
and retention in the industries
described in Section I.B of this SGA.
Each CBO/RAP consortium must
consist of a minimum of two
components: (1) An industry RAP
sponsor (which can be an individual
employer, association of employers, or
an apprenticeship committee designated
by the sponsor to administer and
operate an apprenticeship program and
in whose name the apprenticeship
program is registered or approved), and
(2) a CBO (which may be a faith-based
organization (FBO)) that has
demonstrated experience in providing
women with job-training services, as
described in the definitions of
apprenticeship committee, CBO, CBO/
RAP consortium, and registered
apprenticeship program sponsors in
Section VIII.F. It is anticipated that
awards will be in the amount of up to
$300,000 over the two-year grant period.
The grants will be awarded in June
2010, and will be funded incrementally.
ADDRESSES: Mailed applications must be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: Mamie Williams,
Grants Management Specialist,
Reference SGA/DFA PY 09–03, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room
N–4716, Washington, DC 20210. For
complete ‘‘Application and Submission
Information,’’ please refer to Section IV.
DATES: Key Dates: The closing date for
receipt of applications is April 29, 2010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This SGA
consists of eight sections:
• Section I provides the funding
opportunity description.
• Section II describes the size and
nature of the anticipated awards.
• Section III describes applicant
eligibility criteria.
• Section IV outlines the application
submission and withdrawal
requirements.
• Section V describes the application
review information.
• Section VI outlines additional
award administration information.
• Section VII lists the agency contact.
• Section VIII provides other
information, including acronyms and
definitions.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Background: The WANTO Act of
1992, Public Law 102–530, 29 U.S.C.
2501 et seq. authorizes DOL to disburse
competitive technical assistance grants
to community-based organizations that,
in turn, assist employers and labor
unions in the recruitment, training,
placement, and retention of women into
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
apprenticeship and nontraditional
occupations. The WANTO Act
Technical Assistance Grants program
was funded and implemented beginning
in fiscal year 1994. The WB and OA coadminister the WANTO Technical
Assistance Grants program, and have
the joint responsibility for
implementing this grant process and
may award grants up to the annuallyappropriated funding levels.
B. Purpose: The WANTO Act’s
purpose is to provide technical
assistance to employers and labor
unions to assist them in placing women
into apprenticeable and nontraditional
occupations (A/NTO). Apprenticeable
occupations are described in Section
VIII.F. One of the means of providing
this technical assistance is through
competitive grants awarded to CBOs
that focus on conducting innovative
projects to improve the recruitment,
selection, training, employment, and
retention of women into apprenticeable
occupations.
DOL has found that placement and
retention of women into A/NTO poses
significant challenges. For example, on
average, only three percent of all newly
registered and active apprentices in
construction occupations currently are
women, although approximately 75
percent of all registered apprenticeship
programs are in the construction
industry. From 1994 to 2002, DOL
awarded WANTO grants annually to
CBOs. The outcomes of these prior
WANTO grants consisted largely of
producing training and resource
manuals, as well as recruitment videos.
The numbers of women placed in
registered apprenticeships through
WANTO grant activities were lower
than expected.
Studies such as the American
Behavioral Scientist article,
‘‘Occupational Barriers for Women,’’ by
Thomas Ruble, Renae Cohen, and Diane
Ruble (Vol. 27, No. 3, 339–356 (1984)),
and a 2009 study by Australia’s National
Center for Vocational Education
Research 1 have shown that some of the
primary barriers to women in
nontraditional occupations (NTO) have
included a lack of specialized support
services, such as dependent care
resources (children and dependent
adults) and on-the-job mentoring and
support from teachers and instructors.
Few of these resources for supportive
services are available to employers and
labor organizations that need assistance
1 Shewring, Fiona. 2009. The female ‘‘tradie’’:
Challenging employment perceptions in nontraditional trades for women. National Center for
Vocational Education Research (NCVER): Adelaide,
Australia. https://www.ncver.edu.au/publications/
2100.html.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15726-15728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6997]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Comment Request for Information Collection for Quick Turnaround
Surveys of the Workforce Investment Act (Extension Without Revisions)
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration.
ACTION: Notice
-----------------------------------------------------------------------.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed collections of information
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program helps to ensure that requested data
can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of the collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed. Currently, the Employment and
Training
[[Page 15727]]
Administration is soliciting comments concerning the collection of data
about quick turnaround surveys of the Workforce Investment Act (due to
expire in May 2010).
A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be
obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section
of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee's section below on or before June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to US Department of Labor,
Employment and Training Administration, Office of Policy Development
and Research, Attention: Richard Muller, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room N-5641, Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number: (202) 693-3680
(this is not a toll-free number). Fax: (202) 693-2766. E-mail:
muller.richard@dol.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Muller, Employment and
Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room N-5637, Washington, DC 20210; (202) 693-3680 (this is
not a toll-free number); e-mail: Muller.Richard@dol.gov; fax: (202)
693-2766 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) is soliciting
comments regarding an extension of a current Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) clearance for a series of quick turnaround surveys in
which data will be collected from state workforce agencies and local
workforce investment areas. The surveys will focus on issues relating
to the governance, administration, funding, service design, and
delivery structure of workforce programs authorized by the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA). Enacted in 1998, WIA has sought to redesign the
workforce investment system by linking over a dozen separately funded
Federal programs, streamlining services, and establishing new
accountability requirements.
ETA has a continuing need for information on WIA operations and is
seeking a further extension of the clearance for conducting a series of
8 to 20 separate surveys over the next three years. Each survey will be
relatively short (10-30 questions) and, depending on the nature of the
survey, may be administered to state workforce agencies, local
workforce boards, One-Stop Career Centers, employment service offices,
or other local-area WIA partners. Each survey will be designed on an ad
hoc basis and will focus on emerging topics of pressing policy
interest. Each survey will either cover the universe of respondents
(for state level information) or a properly drawn random sample (for
local level information). Examples of broad topic areas include:
Local management information system developments.
New processes and procedures.
Services to different target groups.
Integration and coordination with other programs.
Local workforce investment board membership and training.
Quick turnaround surveys are needed for a number of reasons. The
most pressing concerns the need to understand key operational issues in
light of challenges deriving from the Administration's policy
priorities and from the upcoming reauthorization of WIA and of other
partner programs. Timely information, that identifies the scope and
magnitude of various practices or problems, is needed for ETA to
fulfill its obligations to develop high quality policy, administrative
guidance, regulations, and technical assistance.
The data that will be requested in the quick turnaround surveys is
not otherwise available. Other research and evaluation efforts,
including case studies or long-range evaluations, either cover only a
limited number of sites or take many years for data to be gathered and
analyzed. Administrative information and data are too limited: The
five-year Workforce Investment Plans, developed by states and local
areas, are too general in nature to meet ETA's specific informational
needs. Quarterly or annual data reported by states and local areas do
not provide information on key operational practices and issues. Thus,
ETA has no alternative mechanism for collecting information that both
identifies the scope and magnitude of emerging WIA implementation
issues and provides the information on a quick turnaround basis.
ETA will make every effort to coordinate the quick turnaround
surveys with other research it is conducting, in order to ease the
burden on local and state respondents, to avoid duplication, and to
fully explore how interim data and information from each study can be
used to inform other studies. Information from the quick response
surveys will complement but not duplicate other ETA reporting
requirements or evaluation studies.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments
which:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions
Type of Review: Extension without changes.
Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
Title: Quick Turnaround Surveys of WIA.
OMB Number: 1205-0436.
Affected Public: State and local workforce agencies and workforce
investment boards, and WIA partner program agencies at the state and
local levels.
Total Respondents: Varies by survey, from 54 to 250 respondents per
survey, for up to 20 surveys. See Summary Burden chart below:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate
Number of Average time burden hours Estimated Total annual
Sample Size questions per question per survey number of burden hours
(minutes) (hours) surveys
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lower-Bound............................................. 54 10 1 9 8 72
Upper-Bound............................................. 250 30 3 375 20 7,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 15728]]
Total Burden Cost for capital and startup: $0.
Total Burden Cost for operation and maintenance: $0.
Comments submitted in response to this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the
information collection request; they will also become a matter of
public record.
Dated: March 24, 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-6997 Filed 3-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
