Certain Crepe Paper Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 15415-15416 [2010-6892]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Notices submitted by either mail or electronically, but not by both methods. Self-nominations will be accepted. NACMBE Members will be selected in accordance with applicable Department of Commerce guidelines and in a manner that ensures that NACMBE has a balanced membership. In this respect, the Secretary seeks to appoint members who represent a diversity of industries, ethnic backgrounds and geographical regions, and to the extent practicable, gender and persons with disabilities. All appointments shall be made without discrimination on the basis of age, ethnicity, gender, disability, sexual orientation, or cultural, religious, or socioeconomic status. All appointments shall also be made without regard to political affiliations. Dated: March 23, 2010. David A. Hinson, National Director, Minority Business Development Agency. The application to expand FTZ 26 to add proposed Site 18 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.28, and to the Board’s standard 2,000–acre activation limit for the overall general– purpose zone project, and further subject to a sunset provision that would terminate authority on March 31, 2015, if no activity under FTZ procedures has occurred at Site 18 before that date. Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of March 2010. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign–Trade Zones Board. Attest: Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–6897 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S [FR Doc. 2010–6969 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BILLING CODE P International Trade Administration DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [A–570–895] Foreign–Trade Zones Board Certain Crepe Paper Products From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order [Order No. 1670] Expansion of Foreign–Trade Zone 26, Atlanta, Georgia, Area cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign–Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign– Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Georgia Foreign–Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign–Trade Zone 26, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand its zone to add proposed Site 18 in the Atlanta, Georgia, area, within the Atlanta Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 55–2008, filed 10/6/ 08); Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (73 FR 60676–60677, 10/14/08; correction, 73 FR 63675, 10/27/08) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the examiner’s report (including addendum), and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board’s regulations are satisfied, and that the approval of proposed Site 18 is in the public interest; Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: VerDate Nov<24>2008 09:18 Apr 05, 2010 Jkt 220001 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce DATES: Effective Date: March 29, 2010. SUMMARY: On December 1, 2009, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty order on certain crepe paper products from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). On the basis of a timely notice of intent to participate, and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of the domestic interested party, as well as a lack of response from respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited sunset review. As a result of the sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The dumping margins are identified in the Final Results of Review section of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3927. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15415 Background On December 1, 2009, the Department published the notice of initiation of the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper products from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 74 FR 62748 (December 1, 2009). On December 3, 2009, the Department received a notice of intent to participate from a domestic producer, Seaman Paper Company of Massachusetts (‘‘Seaman Paper,’’ ‘‘domestic interested party,’’ or ‘‘Petitioner’’). Submission of the notice of intent to participate filed by Petitioner was within the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department’s regulations. The domestic interested party claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as Seaman Paper is a domestic manufacturer of crepe paper products in the United States. On December 31, 2009, the Department received a substantive response from the domestic interested party within the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department’s regulations. We did not receive responses from any respondent interested parties to this proceeding. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the Department’s regulations, the Department determined to conduct an expedited review of the order. As explained in the memorandum from the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from February 5, through February 12, 2010. Thus, all deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by seven days. The revised deadline for the final of this expedited review is now April 7, 2010. See Memorandum to the Record from Ronald Lorentzen, DAS for Import Administration, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During the Recent Snowstorm,’’ dated February 12, 2010. Scope of the Order For purposes of the order, the term ‘‘certain crepe paper’’ includes crepe paper products that have a basis weight not exceeding 29 grams per square meter prior to being creped and, if appropriate, flame-proofed. Crepe paper has a finely wrinkled surface texture and typically but not exclusively is treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1 15416 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Notices paper is typically but not exclusively produced as streamers in roll form and packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper may or may not be bleached, dye colored, surface-colored, surface decorated or printed, glazed, sequined, embossed, die-cut, and/or flame retardant. Subject crepe paper may be rolled, flat or folded, and may be packaged by banding or wrapping with paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/ or by placing in boxes for distribution and use by the ultimate consumer. Packages of crepe paper subject to the order may consist solely of crepe paper of one color and/or style, or may contain multiple colors and/or styles. The merchandise subject to the order does not have specific classification numbers assigned to them under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Subject merchandise may be under one or more of several different HTSUS subheadings, including: 4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; 4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.39; 4806.40; 4808.30; 4808.90; 4811.90; 4818.90; 4823.90; 9505.90.40. The tariff classifications are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’ (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’) from John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated March 23, 2010, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the Central Records Unit in room 1117 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the web at https:// ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Review Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of VerDate Nov<24>2008 09:18 Apr 05, 2010 Jkt 220001 dumping at the following percentage margins: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emeka Chukwudebe, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Margin Administration, International Trade (percent) Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 266.83 Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 266.83 telephone: 202–482–0219. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Manufacturers/exporters/producers Fuzhou Light Industry Import and Export Co., Ltd. ......................... Fuzhou Magicpro Gifts Co., Ltd. .. Everlasting Business and Industry Co. Ltd. ..................................... Fujian Nanping Investment and Enterprise Co., Ltd. ................... Ningbo Spring Stationary Co., Ltd. PRC–Wide .................................... 266.83 266.83 266.83 266.83 This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with section 351.305 of the Department’s regulations. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: March 23, 2010. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2010–6892 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–552–801] Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 2010. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) has determined that two requests for a new shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen fish fillets (‘‘fish fillets’’) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’), received on February 19, 2010, and February 24, 2010, meet the statutory and regulatory requirements for initiation. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) for the two NSRs is August 1, 2009, through February 15, 2010. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Background The notice announcing the antidumping duty order on fish fillets from Vietnam was published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2003. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 68 FR 47909 (August 12, 2003) (‘‘Antidumping Duty Order’’). On February 19, 2010, and on February 24, 2010, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214(c), the Department received two NSR requests from Thien Ma Seafood Company, Ltd. (‘‘Thien Ma’’) and International Development & Investment Corporation (‘‘IDI’’), respectively. Thien Ma and IDI’s requests were properly made during February 2010, which is the semi–annual anniversary of the Antidumping Duty Order. In response to inquiries from the Department, Thien Ma and IDI also submitted amendments to their initial NSR requests on March 17, 2010, and March 19, 2010, respectively. In this instance, IDI’s sale of subject merchandise was made during the POR specified by the Department’s regulations but the shipment entered within 15 days after the end of the POR. The Department finds that extending the POR to capture this entry would not prevent the completion of the review within the time limits set by the Department’s regulations. Therefore, the Department has extended the POR for the new shipper review of IDI by 15 days. Thien Ma and IDI certified that they are both the producer and exporter of the subject merchandise upon which the requests were based. Thien Ma and IDI also submitted public versions of their requests, which adequately summarized proprietary information and provided explanations as to why certain proprietary information is not capable of summarization. Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), Thien Ma and IDI certified that they did not export subject merchandise to the United States during the period of investigation (‘‘POI’’). In addition, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Thien Ma and IDI certified that, since E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 59 (Monday, March 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15415-15416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-895]


Certain Crepe Paper Products From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce

DATES: Effective Date: March 29, 2010.
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2009, the Department of Commerce 
(``Department'') initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty 
order on certain crepe paper products from the People's Republic of 
China (``PRC''). On the basis of a timely notice of intent to 
participate, and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of 
the domestic interested party, as well as a lack of response from 
respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited 
sunset review. As a result of the sunset review, the Department finds 
that revocation of the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead 
to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The dumping margins are 
identified in the Final Results of Review section of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3927.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 1, 2009, the Department published the notice of 
initiation of the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on crepe 
paper products from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). See Initiation of Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Review, 74 FR 62748 (December 1, 2009). On December 3, 
2009, the Department received a notice of intent to participate from a 
domestic producer, Seaman Paper Company of Massachusetts (``Seaman 
Paper,'' ``domestic interested party,'' or ``Petitioner''). Submission 
of the notice of intent to participate filed by Petitioner was within 
the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department's 
regulations. The domestic interested party claimed interested party 
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as Seaman Paper is a 
domestic manufacturer of crepe paper products in the United States. On 
December 31, 2009, the Department received a substantive response from 
the domestic interested party within the deadline specified in section 
351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department's regulations. We did not receive 
responses from any respondent interested parties to this proceeding. As 
a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and section 
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the Department's regulations, the Department 
determined to conduct an expedited review of the order.
    As explained in the memorandum from the Deputy Assistant Secretary 
for Import Administration, the Department has exercised its discretion 
to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal 
Government from February 5, through February 12, 2010. Thus, all 
deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by seven 
days. The revised deadline for the final of this expedited review is 
now April 7, 2010. See Memorandum to the Record from Ronald Lorentzen, 
DAS for Import Administration, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative 
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During the Recent 
Snowstorm,'' dated February 12, 2010.

Scope of the Order

    For purposes of the order, the term ``certain crepe paper'' 
includes crepe paper products that have a basis weight not exceeding 29 
grams per square meter prior to being creped and, if appropriate, 
flame-proofed. Crepe paper has a finely wrinkled surface texture and 
typically but not exclusively is treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe

[[Page 15416]]

paper is typically but not exclusively produced as streamers in roll 
form and packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper may or may not be 
bleached, dye colored, surface-colored, surface decorated or printed, 
glazed, sequined, embossed, die-cut, and/or flame retardant. Subject 
crepe paper may be rolled, flat or folded, and may be packaged by 
banding or wrapping with paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/or by 
placing in boxes for distribution and use by the ultimate consumer. 
Packages of crepe paper subject to the order may consist solely of 
crepe paper of one color and/or style, or may contain multiple colors 
and/or styles. The merchandise subject to the order does not have 
specific classification numbers assigned to them under the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Subject merchandise 
may be under one or more of several different HTSUS subheadings, 
including: 4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; 4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.39; 
4806.40; 4808.30; 4808.90; 4811.90; 4818.90; 4823.90; 9505.90.40. The 
tariff classifications are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum'' (``Decision Memorandum'') from John M. Andersen, 
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Import Administration, dated March 23, 2010, which is hereby adopted by 
this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include 
the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the 
magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked. 
Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this 
review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, 
which is on file in the Central Records Unit in room 1117 of the main 
Commerce building.
    In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be 
accessed directly on the web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper 
copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in 
content.

Final Results of Review

    Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine 
that revocation of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from the 
PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at 
the following percentage margins:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Margin
              Manufacturers/exporters/producers                (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fuzhou Light Industry Import and Export Co., Ltd.............     266.83
Fuzhou Magicpro Gifts Co., Ltd...............................     266.83
Everlasting Business and Industry Co. Ltd....................     266.83
Fujian Nanping Investment and Enterprise Co., Ltd............     266.83
Ningbo Spring Stationary Co., Ltd............................     266.83
PRC-Wide.....................................................     266.83
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with section 351.305 of the 
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms 
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance 
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: March 23, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-6892 Filed 3-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P