Certain Crepe Paper Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 15415-15416 [2010-6892]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Notices
submitted by either mail or
electronically, but not by both methods.
Self-nominations will be accepted.
NACMBE Members will be selected in
accordance with applicable Department
of Commerce guidelines and in a
manner that ensures that NACMBE has
a balanced membership. In this respect,
the Secretary seeks to appoint members
who represent a diversity of industries,
ethnic backgrounds and geographical
regions, and to the extent practicable,
gender and persons with disabilities.
All appointments shall be made
without discrimination on the basis of
age, ethnicity, gender, disability, sexual
orientation, or cultural, religious, or
socioeconomic status. All appointments
shall also be made without regard to
political affiliations.
Dated: March 23, 2010.
David A. Hinson,
National Director, Minority Business
Development Agency.
The application to expand FTZ 26 to
add proposed Site 18 is approved,
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations, including Section 400.28,
and to the Board’s standard 2,000–acre
activation limit for the overall general–
purpose zone project, and further
subject to a sunset provision that would
terminate authority on March 31, 2015,
if no activity under FTZ procedures has
occurred at Site 18 before that date.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th
day of March 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman,
Foreign–Trade Zones Board.
Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–6897 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
[FR Doc. 2010–6969 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BILLING CODE P
International Trade Administration
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A–570–895]
Foreign–Trade Zones Board
Certain Crepe Paper Products From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited Sunset Review of
Antidumping Duty Order
[Order No. 1670]
Expansion of Foreign–Trade Zone 26,
Atlanta, Georgia, Area
cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to its authority under the
Foreign–Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign–
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Georgia Foreign–Trade
Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign–Trade
Zone 26, submitted an application to the
Board for authority to expand its zone
to add proposed Site 18 in the Atlanta,
Georgia, area, within the Atlanta
Customs and Border Protection port of
entry (FTZ Docket 55–2008, filed 10/6/
08);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (73 FR 60676–60677, 10/14/08;
correction, 73 FR 63675, 10/27/08) and
the application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendation of the
examiner’s report (including
addendum), and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the approval of proposed Site 18 is
in the public interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
09:18 Apr 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
DATES: Effective Date: March 29, 2010.
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2009, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) initiated a sunset review
of the antidumping duty order on
certain crepe paper products from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). On
the basis of a timely notice of intent to
participate, and an adequate substantive
response filed on behalf of the domestic
interested party, as well as a lack of
response from respondent interested
parties, the Department conducted an
expedited sunset review. As a result of
the sunset review, the Department finds
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping.
The dumping margins are identified in
the Final Results of Review section of
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3927.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15415
Background
On December 1, 2009, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on crepe paper products from the
PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’). See Initiation of Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 74 FR 62748
(December 1, 2009). On December 3,
2009, the Department received a notice
of intent to participate from a domestic
producer, Seaman Paper Company of
Massachusetts (‘‘Seaman Paper,’’
‘‘domestic interested party,’’ or
‘‘Petitioner’’). Submission of the notice
of intent to participate filed by
Petitioner was within the deadline
specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of
the Department’s regulations. The
domestic interested party claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as Seaman Paper is
a domestic manufacturer of crepe paper
products in the United States. On
December 31, 2009, the Department
received a substantive response from the
domestic interested party within the
deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department’s
regulations. We did not receive
responses from any respondent
interested parties to this proceeding. As
a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and section
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department determined to conduct an
expedited review of the order.
As explained in the memorandum
from the Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, the Department
has exercised its discretion to toll
deadlines for the duration of the closure
of the Federal Government from
February 5, through February 12, 2010.
Thus, all deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by
seven days. The revised deadline for the
final of this expedited review is now
April 7, 2010. See Memorandum to the
Record from Ronald Lorentzen, DAS for
Import Administration, regarding
‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As
a Result of the Government Closure
During the Recent Snowstorm,’’ dated
February 12, 2010.
Scope of the Order
For purposes of the order, the term
‘‘certain crepe paper’’ includes crepe
paper products that have a basis weight
not exceeding 29 grams per square
meter prior to being creped and, if
appropriate, flame-proofed. Crepe paper
has a finely wrinkled surface texture
and typically but not exclusively is
treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
15416
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Notices
paper is typically but not exclusively
produced as streamers in roll form and
packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper
may or may not be bleached, dye
colored, surface-colored, surface
decorated or printed, glazed, sequined,
embossed, die-cut, and/or flame
retardant. Subject crepe paper may be
rolled, flat or folded, and may be
packaged by banding or wrapping with
paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/
or by placing in boxes for distribution
and use by the ultimate consumer.
Packages of crepe paper subject to the
order may consist solely of crepe paper
of one color and/or style, or may contain
multiple colors and/or styles. The
merchandise subject to the order does
not have specific classification numbers
assigned to them under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Subject merchandise may be
under one or more of several different
HTSUS subheadings, including:
4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; 4802.62;
4802.69; 4804.39; 4806.40; 4808.30;
4808.90; 4811.90; 4818.90; 4823.90;
9505.90.40. The tariff classifications are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes; however, the written
description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ (‘‘Decision
Memorandum’’) from John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated March 23, 2010,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The issues discussed in the Decision
Memorandum include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail if the order were revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in this review and
the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum, which is on
file in the Central Records Unit in room
1117 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3)
of the Act, we determine that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on crepe
paper from the PRC would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
09:18 Apr 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
dumping at the following percentage
margins:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emeka Chukwudebe, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Margin
Administration, International Trade
(percent) Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
266.83 Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
266.83 telephone: 202–482–0219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Manufacturers/exporters/producers
Fuzhou Light Industry Import and
Export Co., Ltd. .........................
Fuzhou Magicpro Gifts Co., Ltd. ..
Everlasting Business and Industry
Co. Ltd. .....................................
Fujian Nanping Investment and
Enterprise Co., Ltd. ...................
Ningbo Spring Stationary Co., Ltd.
PRC–Wide ....................................
266.83
266.83
266.83
266.83
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with section 351.305 of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: March 23, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–6892 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–552–801]
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Initiation of Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 2010.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) has determined that two
requests for a new shipper review
(‘‘NSR’’) of the antidumping duty order
on certain frozen fish fillets (‘‘fish
fillets’’) from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’), received on
February 19, 2010, and February 24,
2010, meet the statutory and regulatory
requirements for initiation. The period
of review (‘‘POR’’) for the two NSRs is
August 1, 2009, through February 15,
2010.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
The notice announcing the
antidumping duty order on fish fillets
from Vietnam was published in the
Federal Register on August 12, 2003.
See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order:
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 68 FR
47909 (August 12, 2003) (‘‘Antidumping
Duty Order’’). On February 19, 2010, and
on February 24, 2010, pursuant to
section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR
351.214(c), the Department received two
NSR requests from Thien Ma Seafood
Company, Ltd. (‘‘Thien Ma’’) and
International Development & Investment
Corporation (‘‘IDI’’), respectively. Thien
Ma and IDI’s requests were properly
made during February 2010, which is
the semi–annual anniversary of the
Antidumping Duty Order. In response to
inquiries from the Department, Thien
Ma and IDI also submitted amendments
to their initial NSR requests on March
17, 2010, and March 19, 2010,
respectively. In this instance, IDI’s sale
of subject merchandise was made
during the POR specified by the
Department’s regulations but the
shipment entered within 15 days after
the end of the POR. The Department
finds that extending the POR to capture
this entry would not prevent the
completion of the review within the
time limits set by the Department’s
regulations. Therefore, the Department
has extended the POR for the new
shipper review of IDI by 15 days. Thien
Ma and IDI certified that they are both
the producer and exporter of the subject
merchandise upon which the requests
were based. Thien Ma and IDI also
submitted public versions of their
requests, which adequately summarized
proprietary information and provided
explanations as to why certain
proprietary information is not capable of
summarization.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i),
Thien Ma and IDI certified that they did
not export subject merchandise to the
United States during the period of
investigation (‘‘POI’’). In addition,
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A),
Thien Ma and IDI certified that, since
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 59 (Monday, March 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15415-15416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6892]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-895]
Certain Crepe Paper Products From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
DATES: Effective Date: March 29, 2010.
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2009, the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on certain crepe paper products from the People's Republic of
China (``PRC''). On the basis of a timely notice of intent to
participate, and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of
the domestic interested party, as well as a lack of response from
respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited
sunset review. As a result of the sunset review, the Department finds
that revocation of the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The dumping margins are
identified in the Final Results of Review section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3927.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2009, the Department published the notice of
initiation of the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on crepe
paper products from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). See Initiation of Five-Year
(``Sunset'') Review, 74 FR 62748 (December 1, 2009). On December 3,
2009, the Department received a notice of intent to participate from a
domestic producer, Seaman Paper Company of Massachusetts (``Seaman
Paper,'' ``domestic interested party,'' or ``Petitioner''). Submission
of the notice of intent to participate filed by Petitioner was within
the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department's
regulations. The domestic interested party claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as Seaman Paper is a
domestic manufacturer of crepe paper products in the United States. On
December 31, 2009, the Department received a substantive response from
the domestic interested party within the deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department's regulations. We did not receive
responses from any respondent interested parties to this proceeding. As
a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and section
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the Department's regulations, the Department
determined to conduct an expedited review of the order.
As explained in the memorandum from the Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, the Department has exercised its discretion
to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal
Government from February 5, through February 12, 2010. Thus, all
deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by seven
days. The revised deadline for the final of this expedited review is
now April 7, 2010. See Memorandum to the Record from Ronald Lorentzen,
DAS for Import Administration, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During the Recent
Snowstorm,'' dated February 12, 2010.
Scope of the Order
For purposes of the order, the term ``certain crepe paper''
includes crepe paper products that have a basis weight not exceeding 29
grams per square meter prior to being creped and, if appropriate,
flame-proofed. Crepe paper has a finely wrinkled surface texture and
typically but not exclusively is treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe
[[Page 15416]]
paper is typically but not exclusively produced as streamers in roll
form and packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper may or may not be
bleached, dye colored, surface-colored, surface decorated or printed,
glazed, sequined, embossed, die-cut, and/or flame retardant. Subject
crepe paper may be rolled, flat or folded, and may be packaged by
banding or wrapping with paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/or by
placing in boxes for distribution and use by the ultimate consumer.
Packages of crepe paper subject to the order may consist solely of
crepe paper of one color and/or style, or may contain multiple colors
and/or styles. The merchandise subject to the order does not have
specific classification numbers assigned to them under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Subject merchandise
may be under one or more of several different HTSUS subheadings,
including: 4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; 4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.39;
4806.40; 4808.30; 4808.90; 4811.90; 4818.90; 4823.90; 9505.90.40. The
tariff classifications are provided for convenience and customs
purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum'' (``Decision Memorandum'') from John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, dated March 23, 2010, which is hereby adopted by
this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include
the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this
review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum,
which is on file in the Central Records Unit in room 1117 of the main
Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be
accessed directly on the web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper
copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine
that revocation of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from the
PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at
the following percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
Manufacturers/exporters/producers (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fuzhou Light Industry Import and Export Co., Ltd............. 266.83
Fuzhou Magicpro Gifts Co., Ltd............................... 266.83
Everlasting Business and Industry Co. Ltd.................... 266.83
Fujian Nanping Investment and Enterprise Co., Ltd............ 266.83
Ningbo Spring Stationary Co., Ltd............................ 266.83
PRC-Wide..................................................... 266.83
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with section 351.305 of the
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 23, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-6892 Filed 3-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
