Enforcement Proceeding; In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and Products Containing the Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding; Termination of the Enforcement Proceeding, 14470 [2010-6620]

Download as PDF 14470 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 57 / Thursday, March 25, 2010 / Notices response was inadequate.1 The Commission also found that other circumstances warranted conducting a full review. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: March 19, 2010. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–6622 Filed 3–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–631] Enforcement Proceeding; In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and Products Containing the Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding; Termination of the Enforcement Proceeding mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 29) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the above-captioned enforcement proceeding based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this enforcement proceeding are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 1 Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane found that the respondent interested party group response was adequate. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:42 Mar 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this enforcement proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted this enforcement proceeding on December 18, 2009, based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (‘‘Samsung’’) of Korea. 74 FR 67248. The complaint alleges violations of the limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders issued at the conclusion of the underlying investigation, where the Commission found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,771,344. The Commission’s notice of enforcement proceeding named the following respondents: Sharp Corporation of Japan; Sharp Electronics Corporation of Mahwah, New Jersey; and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing, Company of America, Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively, ‘‘Sharp’’). On February 12, 2010, Samsung and Sharp jointly moved to terminate the enforcement proceeding on the basis of a settlement agreement. No party opposed the motion. The ALJ issued the subject ID on March 5, 2010, granting the motion for termination. He found that the motion for termination satisfies Commission rule 210.21(b). He further found, pursuant to Commission rule 210.50(b)(2), that termination of this enforcement proceeding by settlement agreement is in the public interest. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID, and the enforcement proceeding is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission. PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Issued: March 19, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–6620 Filed 3–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–702] In the Matter of: Certain Liquid Crystal Display Modules and Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Making the Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation; Termination of the Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 3) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on February 10, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Sharp Corporation (‘‘Sharp’’) of Japan. 75 FR 6705–06 (Feb. 10, 2010). The complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the importation into the United States, the E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM 25MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 57 (Thursday, March 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 14470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-631]


Enforcement Proceeding; In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal 
Display Devices and Products Containing the Same; Notice of a 
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding; Termination of the Enforcement 
Proceeding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 29) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') terminating the above-captioned enforcement proceeding based 
on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this enforcement 
proceeding are or will be available for inspection during official 
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this enforcement proceeding 
may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this enforcement 
proceeding on December 18, 2009, based on a complaint filed by Samsung 
Electronics Co., Ltd. (``Samsung'') of Korea. 74 FR 67248. The 
complaint alleges violations of the limited exclusion order and cease 
and desist orders issued at the conclusion of the underlying 
investigation, where the Commission found a violation of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid 
crystal display devices and products containing the same by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,771,344. The 
Commission's notice of enforcement proceeding named the following 
respondents: Sharp Corporation of Japan; Sharp Electronics Corporation 
of Mahwah, New Jersey; and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing, Company of 
America, Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively, ``Sharp'').
    On February 12, 2010, Samsung and Sharp jointly moved to terminate 
the enforcement proceeding on the basis of a settlement agreement. No 
party opposed the motion.
    The ALJ issued the subject ID on March 5, 2010, granting the motion 
for termination. He found that the motion for termination satisfies 
Commission rule 210.21(b). He further found, pursuant to Commission 
rule 210.50(b)(2), that termination of this enforcement proceeding by 
settlement agreement is in the public interest. No party petitioned for 
review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID, 
and the enforcement proceeding is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: March 19, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-6620 Filed 3-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P