Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review in Part, 13497-13498 [2010-6267]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices
highest rate from any segment of this
administrative proceeding (i.e., the rate
of 329.94 percent), is in accord with
section 776(c) of the Act, which requires
that secondary information be
corroborated. Thus, the Department
finds that the LTFV investigation rate is
corroborated for the purposes of this
administrative review and may
reasonably be applied to the PRC–wide
entity based on Kaifeng’s failure to
cooperate to the best of its ability in this
administrative review.
Preliminary Results of the Review
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
We preliminarily find that the
following weighted–average dumping
margin exists for the period July 1, 2008,
through June 30, 2009:
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review. The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the publication date of the final
results of this review. If these
preliminary results are adopted in our
final results, the Department shall
determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin (Percent)
of the subject merchandise entered, or
PRC–Wide Entity* ........
329.94 withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
*The PRC–entity includes Kaifeng Xinhua date, as provided for by section
Fine Chemical Factory
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the PRC–
wide entity (which includes Kaifeng),
Public Comment
the cash deposit rate will be the PRC–
Interested parties are invited to
wide rate established in the final results
comment on the preliminary results and of review; (2) for previously investigated
may submit case briefs and/or written
or reviewed PRC and non–PRC
comments within ten days of the date of exporters not listed above that have
publication of this notice. See 19 CFR
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
351.309(c). Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals continue to be the exporter–specific rate
to written comments, limited to issues
published for the most recent period; (3)
raised in such briefs or comments, may
for all PRC exporters of subject
be filed no later than five days after the
merchandise that have not been found
time limit for filing the case briefs. See
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
19 CFR 351.309(d). The Department
deposit rate will be the PRC–wide rate
requests that parties submitting written
of 329.94 percent; and (4) for all non–
comments provide an executive
PRC exporters of subject merchandise
summary and a table of authorities as
which have not received their own rate,
well as an additional copy of those
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
comments electronically.
applicable to the PRC exporters that
supplied that non–PRC exporter. These
Any interested party may request a
deposit requirements, when imposed,
hearing within ten days of publication
shall remain in effect until further
of this notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
notice.
Hearing requests should contain the
following information: (1) the party’s
Notification to Importers
name, address, and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
This notice also serves as a
a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral
preliminary reminder to importers of
presentations will be limited to issues
their responsibility under 19 CFR
raised in the briefs. If a request for a
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
hearing is made, parties will be notified regarding the reimbursement of
of the time and date for the hearing to
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
be held at the U.S. Department of
of the relevant entries during this
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution review period. Failure to comply with
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
this requirement could result in the
See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
The Department will issue the final
occurred and the subsequent assessment
results of this administrative review,
of double antidumping duties.
which will include its analysis of any
written comments, no later than 120
These preliminary results of review
days after the publication date of these
are issued and published in accordance
preliminary results. See 19 CFR
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
351.213(h).
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Mar 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13497
Dated: March 16, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–6295 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–848
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the
People’s Republic of China:
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on freshwater
crawfish tail meat (crawfish) from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC) with
respect to China Kingdom (Beijing)
Import & Export Co., Ltd., Shanghai
Ocean Flavor International Trading Co.,
Ltd., Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd.,
Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.,
and Yancheng Hi–King Agriculture
Developing Co., Ltd. (Yancheng Hi–
King). The period of review is
September 1, 2008, through August 31,
2009. The Department is rescinding the
review with respect to Yancheng Hi–
King.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
March 22, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 15, 1997, we published
in the Federal Register an antidumping
duty order on crawfish from the PRC.
See Notice of Amendment to Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat
From the People’s Republic of China, 62
FR 48218 (September 15, 1997). On
September 1, 2009, we published in the
Federal Register a notice of opportunity
to request an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on crawfish
from the PRC. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
13498
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 74
FR 45179 (September 1, 2009). On
September 30, 2009, pursuant to section
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.213(b), the petitioner, the Crawfish
Processors Alliance, requested an
administrative review of the order with
respect to, among others, Yancheng Hi–
King, an exporter of crawfish from the
PRC. On October 26, 2009, in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we
published a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the order. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 74 FR 54956 (October 26, 2009).
Rescission of Review in Part
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), the Department will
rescind an administrative review, ‘‘in
whole or in part, if a party that
requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the
requested review.’’ We received a notice
of withdrawal from the petitioner with
respect to the review requested of
Yancheng Hi–King within the 90-day
time limit. See letter from the petitioner
dated January 25, 2010. Because we
received no other requests for review of
Yancheng Hi–King, we are rescinding
the review of the order with respect to
Yancheng Hi–King. This rescission is in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
The Department intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection 15
days after publication of this notice.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Importer
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Mar 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: March 10, 2010.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–6267 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XS23
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Dumbarton Bridge Seismic Retrofit
Project, California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an
incidental take authorization.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) regulations, notification is
hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization
(IHA) to the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) allowing the
take of small numbers of marine
mammals, by Level B harassment only,
incidental to pile driving associated
with the Dumbarton Bridge Seismic
Retrofit Project.
DATES: Effective August 15, 2010,
through August 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the IHA and the
application are available by writing to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225 or by telephoning the
contact listed here. A copy of the
application containing a list of the
references used in this document may
be obtained by writing to the address
specified above, telephoning the contact
listed below (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT), or visiting the
Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jaclyn Daly, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, 301–713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review. Except with respect to
certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: ‘‘any act
of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which
(i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].’’
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant), and if
the permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close
of the comment period, NMFS must
either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On April 17, 2009, NMFS received a
request from Caltrans to harass marine
mammals incidental to the Dumbarton
Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project. NMFS
issued a notice in the Federal Register
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 54 (Monday, March 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13497-13498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6267]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-570-848
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of
China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the
Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat
(crawfish) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) with respect to
China Kingdom (Beijing) Import & Export Co., Ltd., Shanghai Ocean
Flavor International Trading Co., Ltd., Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd.,
Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd., and Yancheng Hi-King Agriculture
Developing Co., Ltd. (Yancheng Hi-King). The period of review is
September 1, 2008, through August 31, 2009. The Department is
rescinding the review with respect to Yancheng Hi-King.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 22, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3683 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 15, 1997, we published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order on crawfish from the PRC. See Notice of
Amendment to Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People's
Republic of China, 62 FR 48218 (September 15, 1997). On September 1,
2009, we published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
crawfish from the PRC. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or
[[Page 13498]]
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review,
74 FR 45179 (September 1, 2009). On September 30, 2009, pursuant to
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19
CFR 351.213(b), the petitioner, the Crawfish Processors Alliance,
requested an administrative review of the order with respect to, among
others, Yancheng Hi-King, an exporter of crawfish from the PRC. On
October 26, 2009, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the order. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation
in Part, 74 FR 54956 (October 26, 2009).
Rescission of Review in Part
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will
rescind an administrative review, ``in whole or in part, if a party
that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the
date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review.''
We received a notice of withdrawal from the petitioner with respect to
the review requested of Yancheng Hi-King within the 90-day time limit.
See letter from the petitioner dated January 25, 2010. Because we
received no other requests for review of Yancheng Hi-King, we are
rescinding the review of the order with respect to Yancheng Hi-King.
This rescission is in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). The
Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection 15 days after publication of this notice.
Notification to Importer
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 10, 2010.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-6267 Filed 3-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
