Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to Market-Maker Joint Accounts, 13626-13629 [2010-6183]
Download as PDF
13626
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices
securities exchange.6 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,7 which requires that
the rules of a national securities
exchange provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its members and
issuers and other persons using its
facilities, and with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,8 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and
not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission believes that the
proposed co-location fees are equitably
allocated insofar as they are applied on
the same terms to similarly-situated
market participants. In addition, the
Commission believes that the colocation services described in the
proposed rule change are not unfairly
discriminatory because: (1) Co-location
services are offered to all members who
request them and pay the appropriate
fees; (2) as represented by CBOE, the
Exchange has architected its systems so
as to, as much as possible, reduce or
eliminate differences among users of its
systems, whether co-located or not; and
(3) the Exchange has stated that for the
foreseeable future, it has sufficient space
to accommodate all members who may
request the co-location service.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 that the
proposed rule change (SR–CBOE–2010–
008) be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–6184 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am]
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
6 In approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Mar 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–61715; File No. SR–CBOE–
2010–028]
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to Market-Maker
Joint Accounts
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
March 16, 2010.
Background
CBOE Rule 6.55 pertains to multiple
representation by an individual MarketMaker in open outcry. Currently, the
rule provides in relevant part that,
except in accordance with procedures
established by the Exchange or with
respect the Exchange’s permission in
individual cases, no Market-Maker shall
enter or be present in a trading crowd
while a Floor Broker present in the
trading crowd is holding an order on
behalf of the Market-Maker’s individual
account or an order initiated by the
Market-Maker for an account in which
the Market-Maker has an interest.
In addition, Interpretation and Policy
.02 to CBOE Rule 6.55 advises members
to consult CBOE’s Regulatory Circulars
for procedures governing the
simultaneous presence in a trading
crowd of participants in and orders for
the same joint account. The relevant
circulars, RG01–60 and RG01–128, set
forth Exchange procedures and
requirements for trading in joint
accounts that vary depending upon
whether the particular trading occurs in
equity options or in index options and
options on exchange-traded funds
(‘‘ETFs’’).5 While certain restrictions
apply to joint account activity in equity
options,6 there are generally no
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 8,
2010, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend
CBOE Rule 6.55, Multiple
Representation Prohibited, and to
eliminate related Regulatory Circulars
pertaining to joint account activity. The
Exchange is also proposing related
amendments to CBOE Rule 8.9,
Securities Accounts and Orders of
Market-Makers. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Exchange’s
Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Purpose
5 The Regulatory Circular governing joint account
trading in equity products, RG01–60, was last
amended through Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 44152 (April 5, 2001), 66 FR 19262 (April 13,
2001) (SR–CBOE–00–13). The Regulatory Circular
governing joint account trading in certain index
options and options on ETFs was last amended
through Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44433
(June 15, 2001), 66 FR 33589 (June 22, 2001) (SR–
CBOE–2001–30).
6 For equity option classes, RG01–60 currently
provides in part that: (i) A joint account may be
simultaneously represented in a trading crowd only
by participants trading in-person; orders for a joint
account may not be entered in a crowd where a
participant of the joint account is trading in-person
for the joint account; however, if no participant is
trading in-person for the joint account, orders may
be entered via Floor Broker so long as the same
option series in not represented by more than one
Floor Broker; (ii) members may alternate trading inperson between their individual and joint accounts
while in the crowd; members who alternate trading
between accounts must ensure that while trading
the joint account another participant does not enter
orders through a Floor Broker for the joint account
in the same crowd or that an order is not being
continuously represented for the joint account in
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
restrictions on the joint account activity
`
of an individual Market-Maker vis-a-vis
other joint account participants in
certain index and ETF options except
that the members ensure that they do
not trade in-person or by orders such
that (i) a trade occurs between a joint
account participant’s individual MarketMaker account and the joint account of
which he is a participant, or (ii) a trade
occurs in which the buyer and seller are
representing the same joint account and
are on opposite sides of a transaction.7
These limitations on trading between a
Market-Maker’s individual account or a
the same crowd; (iii) it is the responsibility of a
joint account participant to ascertain whether joint
account orders have been entered in a crowd prior
to trading the joint account in-person; (iv) joint
account participants may not act as a Floor Broker
for the joint account of which they are a participant;
(v) when a joint account participant is trading in a
crowd for his individual account or actively as a
Floor Broker for accounts unrelated to his joint
account, another participant of the joint account
may either trade in-person for the joint account or
enter orders for the joint account with other Floor
Brokers; (vi) members are prohibited from entering
orders in a particular crowd with Floor Brokers for
their individual or joint account whenever they are
trading in-person in that crowd; this applies even
though the orders are for an account they are not
then actively trading. Other exceptions to these
procedures and requirements may apply. For
example, exceptions to item (vi) above are currently
outlined in Interpretations and Policies .01, .03 and
.04 of CBOE Rule 6.55.
7 For certain index and ETF option classes, RG01–
128 currently provides in part that: (i) Joint
accounts may be simultaneously represented in a
trading crowd by participants trading in-person for
the joint account; (ii) joint account participants who
are not trading in-person in a trading crowd, may
enter orders for the joint account with Floor Brokers
even if other participants are trading the same joint
account in-person; (iii) when series are
simultaneously opened during rotation, joint
account participants trading the joint account inperson may enter orders for the joint account with
Floor Brokers in series where they are unable to
trade the joint account in-person; (iv) there is no
restriction on the number of joint account
participants that may participate on behalf of the
joint account on the same trade in the option; (v)
when joint account participants are trading in a
trading crowd for their individual account or as a
Floor Broker, another participant of the joint
account may trade for the joint account in-person
or enter orders for the joint account with Floor
Brokers; (vi) except for the exemption described in
(vii) below, members are prohibited from entering
orders for their individual or joint accounts while
they are trading in-person in a trading crowd even
if the orders are for an account they are not then
actively trading; (vii) managers of Exchange
approved RAES joint accounts may enter orders
with Floor Brokers for the RAES joint account if the
manager is trading in-person for his individual
account in the trading crowd; if the manager is
trading in-person for the joint account the manager
may not enter an order for the joint account with
a Floor Broker; (viii) joint account participants may
not act as a Floor Broker for the joint account of
which they are a participant; and (ix) members may
alternate trading in-person for their individual
account and their joint account while in a trading
crowd. Other exceptions to these procedures and
requirements may apply. For example, exceptions
to item (vi) above are currently outlined in
Interpretations and Policies .01, .03 and .04 of
CBOE Rule 6.55.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Mar 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
joint account in which he is a
participant and another member acting
on behalf of the joint account are
provided in RG01–60 and RG01–128, as
well as in Interpretation and Policy .06
to CBOE Rule 8.9. Interpretation and
Policy .03 to CBOE Rule 6.55 also sets
forth in relevant part an exception
procedure that applies to any options
class and allows a Market-Maker to
enter or be present in the trading crowd
when a Floor Broker holds a solicited
order on behalf of a Market-Maker’s
joint account.8 This procedure is in
addition to, and not a limitation of, the
joint account exception procedures
identified in Interpretation and Policy
.02.
Proposed Changes
In order to simplify the rule and
create uniform requirements in all
options classes for joint account activity
`
of an individual Market-Maker vis-a-vis
other joint account participants, the
Exchange is proposing to apply the
terms of the circular currently
applicable to trading in certain index
and ETF options (RG01–128) to trading
in all options classes. To accomplish
this change, the provisions of the index
and ETF options circular (RG01–128)
will be incorporated into the rule text,
replacing existing Interpretation and
Policy .02. CBOE does not propose to
modify any of the existing joint account
trading policies or procedures set forth
in RG01–128, except as noted below.
The equity option circular (RG01–60)
will no longer be applicable and will be
superseded by revised Interpretation
and Policy .02.
The joint account trading policies and
procedures applicable to all options
classes will be the same as is set forth
in RG01–128,9 except as follows. First,
references to CBOE’s Retail Automatic
Execution System (‘‘RAES’’) will not be
incorporated into the rule text. CBOE no
longer utilizes RAES and, therefore, the
references in RG01–128 are outdated.
8 CBOE Rule 6.55.03 currently provides that,
subject to the requirements of CBOE Rule 6.9,
Solicited Transactions, or 6.74, Crossing Orders, as
applicable, a Market-Maker may permissibly enter
or be present in a trading crowd in which a Floor
Broker is present who holds (a) a solicited order on
behalf of the Market-Maker’s individual or joint
account or (b) a solicited order initiated by the
Market-Maker for an account in which the MarketMaker has an interest, provided that the MarketMaker makes the Floor Broker aware of the MarketMaker’s intention to enter or to be present in the
trading crowd and the Market-Maker refrains from
trading in-person on the same trade as the original
order. It is the responsibility of the Market-Maker
utilizing these procedures to ascertain whether
solicited orders for the Market-Maker’s joint
account have been entered in a trading crowd prior
to the Market-Maker trading the joint account inperson.
9 See note 7, supra, and related discussion.
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13627
Second, RG01–128 includes a
description of a manual process for
identifying joint account transactions on
trade tickets that is outdated and no
longer applicable, and thus will not be
incorporated into the rule text.10
Proposed Rule 6.55.02(j) and amended
Rule 8.9.03 will set forth the updated
process. In particular, proposed Rule
6.55.02(j) will provide that, when
completing a trade ticket for a joint
account, it must contain such
information as may be required by the
Exchange under Rule 6.51(d). Rule
8.9.03, as proposed to be amended,
would provide that, for purposes of
evaluating Market-Maker performance
in accordance with Rule 8.7.03, trading
activity in the joint account shall be
credited to the Market-Maker either
individually or collectively with the
Market-Makers of the same member
organization.11 Third, with respect to
the prohibitions on Market-Makers
trading with their joint account and on
trades in which the buyer and seller
represent the same joint account and are
on opposite sides of the transaction, the
rule text will provide that it is the
responsibility of a joint account
participant to ascertain whether joint
account orders have been entered in a
crowd prior to trading the joint account
in-person.
Lastly, CBOE is proposing to delete
Interpretation and Policy .03 to Rule
6.55.12 The provisions in Interpretation
and Policy .03 pertaining to
simultaneous joint account activity are
no longer necessary given the abovedescribed proposed changes to
Interpretation and Policy .02. The
10 Specifically, RG01–128 provides that the
proper procedure for completing a trade ticket for
joint account transactions is that both the member’s
and joint account acronym must be included. The
circular also indicates that this information is
required to ensure that the initiating joint account
member receives credit for such transactions as they
relate to reporting and market performance
obligations set forth in Exchange Rules 6.51(d) and
8.7.03. Rule 6.51(d) provides that each member
shall file with the Exchange trade information
showing for each transaction certain trade
information specified in the Rule as well as such
other information as may be required by the
Exchange. Rule 8.7.03 provides for certain
percentage requirements that apply to MarketMaker trading activity in appointed classes and inperson requirements for Market-Makers in Hybrid
3.0 classes.
11 This change is intended to update Rule 8.9.03
to be consistent with the provisions of Rule 8.7.03.
In accordance with Rule 6.51(d)(m), the Exchange
may require that other information beyond that
specified in Rule 6.51(d) shall be reported for
Exchange transactions. In this regard, the Exchange
intends to specify that transactions for MarketMaker joint accounts be identified with the joint
account acronym. This trade information reporting
requirement for joint account transactions, and any
changes thereto, will be announced to the
membership via circular.
12 See note 8, supra.
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
13628
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
remaining provisions in Interpretation
and Policy .03 pertaining to multiple
representation by an individual MarketMaker (for solicited orders entered on
behalf of the Market-Maker’s individual
account or solicited orders initiated by
the Market-Maker himself for an
account in which the Market-Maker has
an interest) are no longer necessary
since they are duplicative of
Interpretation and Policy .04.13
The proposed changes will make the
policy governing joint account trading
in equity options the same as the
current policy governing index option
trading (subject to the changes described
above), where multiple representation of
orders for the same joint account is
permitted by participants in the joint
account trading in-person at the trading
post and/or by Floor Brokers
representing orders at the post. (The
current equity option policy is more
restrictive in that it only permits joint
representation by participants trading
in-person and does not permit multiple
representation of orders for the same
joint account if one or more of the
orders is represented by a Floor Broker.)
In this regard, the Exchange believes the
proposed changes to the equity option
policy reflect changes that have
occurred in the trading environment
since that policy was enacted over 13
years ago, including the Exchange’s
migration from a floor-based market to
a hybrid environment where MarketMakers can trade in-person on the floor
or remotely in a larger number of option
classes (which may present more need
for the services of Floor Brokers), and
the increasing prevalence of CBOE
Market-Maker member organizations
13 CBOE Rule 6.55.04, which is proposed to be
renumbered to CBOE Rule 6.55.01(b), applies to a
Market-Maker’s orders generally, including
solicited orders. In [sic] provides that a MarketMaker may permissibly enter or be present in a
trading crowd in which a Floor Broker is present
who holds an order on behalf of the Market-Maker’s
individual account or an order initiated by the
Market-Maker for an account in which the MarketMaker has an interest, provided that (i) the MarketMaker makes the Floor Broker aware of the MarketMaker’s intention to enter or to be present in the
trading crowd and (ii) the Market-Maker refrains
from trading in-person on the same trade as the
order being represented by the Floor Broker. In
addition to renumbering Rule 6.55.04 to 6.55.01(b),
the Exchange is proposing to clarify that, with
respect to the condition in (ii) above, the MarketMaker does not need to refrain from trading inperson on the same order if other in-crowd market
participants choose not to trade the remaining
portion of the order. This allowance to trade when
other in-crowd market participants choose not to
trade is similar to language in other CBOE rules.
See, e.g., subparagraph (d)(viii) of Rule 6.74,
Crossing Orders, which provides that nothing
prohibits a Floor Broker, On-Floor DPM or On-Floor
LMM, as applicable, from trading more than his
percentage entitlement if the other in-crowd market
participants do not choose to trade the remaining
portion of an order.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Mar 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
utilizing joint accounts (as compared to
individual accounts). The proposed
changes ensure that member
organizations that choose to employ a
joint account for their Exchange trading
are not disadvantaged in participating in
`
trades vis-a-vis those member
organizations that choose to employ
individual Market-Maker accounts.14
The Exchange also believes the
proposed changes will reduce
unnecessary complexity and confusion,
and delineate an unambiguous standard
for multiple representation across all
option classes.15
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act 16
and the rules and regulations
thereunder and, in particular, the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.17 Specifically, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 18
requirements that the rules of an
exchange be designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts, to remove impediments to and to
perfect the mechanism for a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange believes the proposed changes
will eliminate a distinction that
currently exists between member
organizations that manage their equity
option positions differently and, overall,
14 Some member organizations choose to have
their various Market-Makers trade in a joint account
so that the member organization’s positions can be
more easily monitored and managed. Under the
current equity options policy regarding joint
accounts, however, a joint account may be
simultaneously represented in a trading crowd only
by participants trading in-person. Orders for a joint
account may not be entered with a Floor Broker in
a crowd where a participant of the joint account is
trading in-person for the joint account (unless the
in-crowd participant and Floor Broker refrain from
participating on the same trade). However, if no
participant is trading in-person for the joint
account, orders may be entered via Floor Broker so
long as the same option series is not represented by
more than one Floor Broker. On the other hand,
under the current equity options policy, a member
organization using individual Market-Maker
accounts is able to be simultaneously represented
by each Market-Maker’s individual account,
whether the accounts are being traded in-person
and/or by order. The proposed change would
eliminate the disadvantage currently suffered by
member organizations using joint account
structures.
15 For example, the Exchange notes that many
trading crowds no longer exclusively trade equity
options or index options. In that regard, the
proposed rule change will reduce unnecessary
complexity and confusion over which policy
applies.
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will reduce unnecessary complexity and
confusion, and delineate an
unambiguous standard for multiple
representation across all option classes.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
for 30 days from the date on which it
was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization has given the
Commission written notice of its intent
to file the proposed rule change at least
five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or
such shorter time as designated by the
Commission, the proposed rule change
has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 19 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.20 At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission
may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
19 15
20 17
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2010–028 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2010–028. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2010–028 and should be submitted on
or before April 12, 2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–6183 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am]
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–61713; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2010–006)
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule
Change To Modify the Press Release
Requirements for Listed Companies
March 15, 2010.
I. Introduction
On January 13, 2010, The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
modify certain of Nasdaq’s rules
pertaining to its press release
requirements for listed companies. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
February 8, 2010.3 The Commission
received no comments on the proposed
rule change. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq is proposing to modify certain
of its rules related to the issuer
compliance process that currently
require a company to disclose
information in a press release or through
the news media. Nasdaq notes that these
rules were generally adopted to address
inconsistent issuer disclosure practices
and reflected the view that issuing a
press release was the only way to assure
wide dissemination of an important
event. However, in 2002, the
Commission adopted Regulation FD,4
and Nasdaq amended its rules to allow
listed companies to provide disclosure
of material news via any Regulation FD
compliant means.5 Nasdaq asserts that
there is now broad acceptance of
Regulation FD compliant methods of
disclosure, such as through the use of a
Form 8–K. Additionally, Nasdaq argues
that its requirements in some instances
are duplicative of the Form 8–K
requirements, and notes that Form 8–K
disclosures are readily available to
investors and the information contained
in them is widely reported on by the
news media. As such, Nasdaq is
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1)
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61461
(February 1, 2010), 75 FR 6241 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 17 CFR 243.100–103.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46901
(November 25, 2002), 67 FR 72011 (December 3,
2002).
2 17
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Mar 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13629
proposing to modify certain of its rules,
as described below, to permit disclosure
either through a press release or by
filing a Form 8–K where required by
Commission rules.6
First, Nasdaq proposes to amend
Rules 5250(b)(3), 5810(b), 5840(k) and
IM–5810–1, which require disclosure of
notifications from Nasdaq staff or an
Adjudicatory Body 7 regarding a
company’s compliance with the listing
standards. Rules 5250(b)(3) and 5810(b)
require a company to ‘‘make a public
announcement through the news
media’’ 8 disclosing the receipt of a
notice that the company does not meet
a listing standard, that staff has
determined to delist the company, or
that the company has received a Public
Reprimand Letter. IM–5810–1 provides
the time frame for companies to make
these disclosures and describes the
consequences of failing to do so. Rule
5840(k) requires that a company that
receives a Public Reprimand Letter from
an Adjudicatory Body must make ‘‘a
public announcement through the news
media’’ disclosing receipt of that letter.
Nasdaq proposes to modify these rules
to allow the company, in each case, to
make a public announcement by ‘‘filing
a Form 8–K, where required by SEC
rules, or by issuing a press release.’’ 9
However, Nasdaq proposes that a
company that is late in filing a required
periodic report with the Commission
would still be required to issue a press
release announcing that it has received
notice that it does not meet that
requirement, and would not be
permitted to fulfill this requirement by
only filing a Form 8–K. Nasdaq also
proposes to clarify in each of these rules
that notification of these disclosures
should be made to the Nasdaq
MarketWatch Department through
6 The Commission notes that Nasdaq is not
proposing any change to Rule 5840(j), regarding the
voluntary delisting of a company, because the press
release requirement in that rule is required by
Exchange Act Rule 12d2–2(c); 17 CFR 240.12d2–
2(c). Nasdaq is also maintaining the requirements
in Rule 5635(c)(4) and IM–5365–1, which require
that a company relying on the inducement
exception to the requirement to obtain shareholder
approval for equity compensation awards must
‘‘disclose in a press release’’ specific information
about the equity award. Finally, as noted above, late
filers will still be required to issue a press release.
See Rule 5250(b)(2) and Rule 5810(b).
7 Rule 5805(a) defines an ‘‘Adjudicatory Body’’ as
the Hearings Panel, the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing
Review Council, or the Nasdaq Board, or a member
thereof.
8 Nasdaq interprets the requirement to disclose
information through the news media to be satisfied
by the issuance of a press release.
9 The Commission notes that under Item 3.01 of
Form 8–K, a company is required to file a Form 8–
K when it receives notice from Nasdaq that the
company does not satisfy a listing standard or when
Nasdaq issues a Public Reprimand Letter to the
company.
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 54 (Monday, March 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13626-13629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6183]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-61715; File No. SR-CBOE-2010-028]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to Market-Maker Joint Accounts
March 16, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 8, 2010, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial''
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act
\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend CBOE Rule 6.55, Multiple
Representation Prohibited, and to eliminate related Regulatory
Circulars pertaining to joint account activity. The Exchange is also
proposing related amendments to CBOE Rule 8.9, Securities Accounts and
Orders of Market-Makers. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.org/Legal), at
the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Background
CBOE Rule 6.55 pertains to multiple representation by an individual
Market-Maker in open outcry. Currently, the rule provides in relevant
part that, except in accordance with procedures established by the
Exchange or with respect the Exchange's permission in individual cases,
no Market-Maker shall enter or be present in a trading crowd while a
Floor Broker present in the trading crowd is holding an order on behalf
of the Market-Maker's individual account or an order initiated by the
Market-Maker for an account in which the Market-Maker has an interest.
In addition, Interpretation and Policy .02 to CBOE Rule 6.55
advises members to consult CBOE's Regulatory Circulars for procedures
governing the simultaneous presence in a trading crowd of participants
in and orders for the same joint account. The relevant circulars, RG01-
60 and RG01-128, set forth Exchange procedures and requirements for
trading in joint accounts that vary depending upon whether the
particular trading occurs in equity options or in index options and
options on exchange-traded funds (``ETFs'').\5\ While certain
restrictions apply to joint account activity in equity options,\6\
there are generally no
[[Page 13627]]
restrictions on the joint account activity of an individual Market-
Maker vis-[agrave]-vis other joint account participants in certain
index and ETF options except that the members ensure that they do not
trade in-person or by orders such that (i) a trade occurs between a
joint account participant's individual Market-Maker account and the
joint account of which he is a participant, or (ii) a trade occurs in
which the buyer and seller are representing the same joint account and
are on opposite sides of a transaction.\7\ These limitations on trading
between a Market-Maker's individual account or a joint account in which
he is a participant and another member acting on behalf of the joint
account are provided in RG01-60 and RG01-128, as well as in
Interpretation and Policy .06 to CBOE Rule 8.9. Interpretation and
Policy .03 to CBOE Rule 6.55 also sets forth in relevant part an
exception procedure that applies to any options class and allows a
Market-Maker to enter or be present in the trading crowd when a Floor
Broker holds a solicited order on behalf of a Market-Maker's joint
account.\8\ This procedure is in addition to, and not a limitation of,
the joint account exception procedures identified in Interpretation and
Policy .02.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Regulatory Circular governing joint account trading in
equity products, RG01-60, was last amended through Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 44152 (April 5, 2001), 66 FR 19262 (April
13, 2001) (SR-CBOE-00-13). The Regulatory Circular governing joint
account trading in certain index options and options on ETFs was
last amended through Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44433 (June
15, 2001), 66 FR 33589 (June 22, 2001) (SR-CBOE-2001-30).
\6\ For equity option classes, RG01-60 currently provides in
part that: (i) A joint account may be simultaneously represented in
a trading crowd only by participants trading in-person; orders for a
joint account may not be entered in a crowd where a participant of
the joint account is trading in-person for the joint account;
however, if no participant is trading in-person for the joint
account, orders may be entered via Floor Broker so long as the same
option series in not represented by more than one Floor Broker; (ii)
members may alternate trading in-person between their individual and
joint accounts while in the crowd; members who alternate trading
between accounts must ensure that while trading the joint account
another participant does not enter orders through a Floor Broker for
the joint account in the same crowd or that an order is not being
continuously represented for the joint account in the same crowd;
(iii) it is the responsibility of a joint account participant to
ascertain whether joint account orders have been entered in a crowd
prior to trading the joint account in-person; (iv) joint account
participants may not act as a Floor Broker for the joint account of
which they are a participant; (v) when a joint account participant
is trading in a crowd for his individual account or actively as a
Floor Broker for accounts unrelated to his joint account, another
participant of the joint account may either trade in-person for the
joint account or enter orders for the joint account with other Floor
Brokers; (vi) members are prohibited from entering orders in a
particular crowd with Floor Brokers for their individual or joint
account whenever they are trading in-person in that crowd; this
applies even though the orders are for an account they are not then
actively trading. Other exceptions to these procedures and
requirements may apply. For example, exceptions to item (vi) above
are currently outlined in Interpretations and Policies .01, .03 and
.04 of CBOE Rule 6.55.
\7\ For certain index and ETF option classes, RG01-128 currently
provides in part that: (i) Joint accounts may be simultaneously
represented in a trading crowd by participants trading in-person for
the joint account; (ii) joint account participants who are not
trading in-person in a trading crowd, may enter orders for the joint
account with Floor Brokers even if other participants are trading
the same joint account in-person; (iii) when series are
simultaneously opened during rotation, joint account participants
trading the joint account in-person may enter orders for the joint
account with Floor Brokers in series where they are unable to trade
the joint account in-person; (iv) there is no restriction on the
number of joint account participants that may participate on behalf
of the joint account on the same trade in the option; (v) when joint
account participants are trading in a trading crowd for their
individual account or as a Floor Broker, another participant of the
joint account may trade for the joint account in-person or enter
orders for the joint account with Floor Brokers; (vi) except for the
exemption described in (vii) below, members are prohibited from
entering orders for their individual or joint accounts while they
are trading in-person in a trading crowd even if the orders are for
an account they are not then actively trading; (vii) managers of
Exchange approved RAES joint accounts may enter orders with Floor
Brokers for the RAES joint account if the manager is trading in-
person for his individual account in the trading crowd; if the
manager is trading in-person for the joint account the manager may
not enter an order for the joint account with a Floor Broker; (viii)
joint account participants may not act as a Floor Broker for the
joint account of which they are a participant; and (ix) members may
alternate trading in-person for their individual account and their
joint account while in a trading crowd. Other exceptions to these
procedures and requirements may apply. For example, exceptions to
item (vi) above are currently outlined in Interpretations and
Policies .01, .03 and .04 of CBOE Rule 6.55.
\8\ CBOE Rule 6.55.03 currently provides that, subject to the
requirements of CBOE Rule 6.9, Solicited Transactions, or 6.74,
Crossing Orders, as applicable, a Market-Maker may permissibly enter
or be present in a trading crowd in which a Floor Broker is present
who holds (a) a solicited order on behalf of the Market-Maker's
individual or joint account or (b) a solicited order initiated by
the Market-Maker for an account in which the Market-Maker has an
interest, provided that the Market-Maker makes the Floor Broker
aware of the Market-Maker's intention to enter or to be present in
the trading crowd and the Market-Maker refrains from trading in-
person on the same trade as the original order. It is the
responsibility of the Market-Maker utilizing these procedures to
ascertain whether solicited orders for the Market-Maker's joint
account have been entered in a trading crowd prior to the Market-
Maker trading the joint account in-person.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Changes
In order to simplify the rule and create uniform requirements in
all options classes for joint account activity of an individual Market-
Maker vis-[agrave]-vis other joint account participants, the Exchange
is proposing to apply the terms of the circular currently applicable to
trading in certain index and ETF options (RG01-128) to trading in all
options classes. To accomplish this change, the provisions of the index
and ETF options circular (RG01-128) will be incorporated into the rule
text, replacing existing Interpretation and Policy .02. CBOE does not
propose to modify any of the existing joint account trading policies or
procedures set forth in RG01-128, except as noted below. The equity
option circular (RG01-60) will no longer be applicable and will be
superseded by revised Interpretation and Policy .02.
The joint account trading policies and procedures applicable to all
options classes will be the same as is set forth in RG01-128,\9\ except
as follows. First, references to CBOE's Retail Automatic Execution
System (``RAES'') will not be incorporated into the rule text. CBOE no
longer utilizes RAES and, therefore, the references in RG01-128 are
outdated. Second, RG01-128 includes a description of a manual process
for identifying joint account transactions on trade tickets that is
outdated and no longer applicable, and thus will not be incorporated
into the rule text.\10\ Proposed Rule 6.55.02(j) and amended Rule
8.9.03 will set forth the updated process. In particular, proposed Rule
6.55.02(j) will provide that, when completing a trade ticket for a
joint account, it must contain such information as may be required by
the Exchange under Rule 6.51(d). Rule 8.9.03, as proposed to be
amended, would provide that, for purposes of evaluating Market-Maker
performance in accordance with Rule 8.7.03, trading activity in the
joint account shall be credited to the Market-Maker either individually
or collectively with the Market-Makers of the same member
organization.\11\ Third, with respect to the prohibitions on Market-
Makers trading with their joint account and on trades in which the
buyer and seller represent the same joint account and are on opposite
sides of the transaction, the rule text will provide that it is the
responsibility of a joint account participant to ascertain whether
joint account orders have been entered in a crowd prior to trading the
joint account in-person.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See note 7, supra, and related discussion.
\10\ Specifically, RG01-128 provides that the proper procedure
for completing a trade ticket for joint account transactions is that
both the member's and joint account acronym must be included. The
circular also indicates that this information is required to ensure
that the initiating joint account member receives credit for such
transactions as they relate to reporting and market performance
obligations set forth in Exchange Rules 6.51(d) and 8.7.03. Rule
6.51(d) provides that each member shall file with the Exchange trade
information showing for each transaction certain trade information
specified in the Rule as well as such other information as may be
required by the Exchange. Rule 8.7.03 provides for certain
percentage requirements that apply to Market-Maker trading activity
in appointed classes and in-person requirements for Market-Makers in
Hybrid 3.0 classes.
\11\ This change is intended to update Rule 8.9.03 to be
consistent with the provisions of Rule 8.7.03. In accordance with
Rule 6.51(d)(m), the Exchange may require that other information
beyond that specified in Rule 6.51(d) shall be reported for Exchange
transactions. In this regard, the Exchange intends to specify that
transactions for Market-Maker joint accounts be identified with the
joint account acronym. This trade information reporting requirement
for joint account transactions, and any changes thereto, will be
announced to the membership via circular.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, CBOE is proposing to delete Interpretation and Policy .03
to Rule 6.55.\12\ The provisions in Interpretation and Policy .03
pertaining to simultaneous joint account activity are no longer
necessary given the above-described proposed changes to Interpretation
and Policy .02. The
[[Page 13628]]
remaining provisions in Interpretation and Policy .03 pertaining to
multiple representation by an individual Market-Maker (for solicited
orders entered on behalf of the Market-Maker's individual account or
solicited orders initiated by the Market-Maker himself for an account
in which the Market-Maker has an interest) are no longer necessary
since they are duplicative of Interpretation and Policy .04.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See note 8, supra.
\13\ CBOE Rule 6.55.04, which is proposed to be renumbered to
CBOE Rule 6.55.01(b), applies to a Market-Maker's orders generally,
including solicited orders. In [sic] provides that a Market-Maker
may permissibly enter or be present in a trading crowd in which a
Floor Broker is present who holds an order on behalf of the Market-
Maker's individual account or an order initiated by the Market-Maker
for an account in which the Market-Maker has an interest, provided
that (i) the Market-Maker makes the Floor Broker aware of the
Market-Maker's intention to enter or to be present in the trading
crowd and (ii) the Market-Maker refrains from trading in-person on
the same trade as the order being represented by the Floor Broker.
In addition to renumbering Rule 6.55.04 to 6.55.01(b), the Exchange
is proposing to clarify that, with respect to the condition in (ii)
above, the Market-Maker does not need to refrain from trading in-
person on the same order if other in-crowd market participants
choose not to trade the remaining portion of the order. This
allowance to trade when other in-crowd market participants choose
not to trade is similar to language in other CBOE rules. See, e.g.,
subparagraph (d)(viii) of Rule 6.74, Crossing Orders, which provides
that nothing prohibits a Floor Broker, On-Floor DPM or On-Floor LMM,
as applicable, from trading more than his percentage entitlement if
the other in-crowd market participants do not choose to trade the
remaining portion of an order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed changes will make the policy governing joint account
trading in equity options the same as the current policy governing
index option trading (subject to the changes described above), where
multiple representation of orders for the same joint account is
permitted by participants in the joint account trading in-person at the
trading post and/or by Floor Brokers representing orders at the post.
(The current equity option policy is more restrictive in that it only
permits joint representation by participants trading in-person and does
not permit multiple representation of orders for the same joint account
if one or more of the orders is represented by a Floor Broker.) In this
regard, the Exchange believes the proposed changes to the equity option
policy reflect changes that have occurred in the trading environment
since that policy was enacted over 13 years ago, including the
Exchange's migration from a floor-based market to a hybrid environment
where Market-Makers can trade in-person on the floor or remotely in a
larger number of option classes (which may present more need for the
services of Floor Brokers), and the increasing prevalence of CBOE
Market-Maker member organizations utilizing joint accounts (as compared
to individual accounts). The proposed changes ensure that member
organizations that choose to employ a joint account for their Exchange
trading are not disadvantaged in participating in trades vis-[agrave]-
vis those member organizations that choose to employ individual Market-
Maker accounts.\14\ The Exchange also believes the proposed changes
will reduce unnecessary complexity and confusion, and delineate an
unambiguous standard for multiple representation across all option
classes.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Some member organizations choose to have their various
Market-Makers trade in a joint account so that the member
organization's positions can be more easily monitored and managed.
Under the current equity options policy regarding joint accounts,
however, a joint account may be simultaneously represented in a
trading crowd only by participants trading in-person. Orders for a
joint account may not be entered with a Floor Broker in a crowd
where a participant of the joint account is trading in-person for
the joint account (unless the in-crowd participant and Floor Broker
refrain from participating on the same trade). However, if no
participant is trading in-person for the joint account, orders may
be entered via Floor Broker so long as the same option series is not
represented by more than one Floor Broker. On the other hand, under
the current equity options policy, a member organization using
individual Market-Maker accounts is able to be simultaneously
represented by each Market-Maker's individual account, whether the
accounts are being traded in-person and/or by order. The proposed
change would eliminate the disadvantage currently suffered by member
organizations using joint account structures.
\15\ For example, the Exchange notes that many trading crowds no
longer exclusively trade equity options or index options. In that
regard, the proposed rule change will reduce unnecessary complexity
and confusion over which policy applies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act \16\ and the rules and regulations thereunder and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\17\
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \18\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove
impediments to and to perfect the mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest. The Exchange believes the proposed changes will
eliminate a distinction that currently exists between member
organizations that manage their equity option positions differently
and, overall, will reduce unnecessary complexity and confusion, and
delineate an unambiguous standard for multiple representation across
all option classes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \19\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\20\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
[[Page 13629]]
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2010-028 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-028. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-028 and should be
submitted on or before April 12, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-6183 Filed 3-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P