Petitions for Modification, 12800-12802 [2010-5786]
Download as PDF
12800
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 17, 2010 / Notices
Dated: March 12, 2010.
Patricia W. Silvey,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and
Variances.
[FR Doc. 2010–5787 Filed 3–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of petitions for
modification of existing mandatory
safety standards.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and
30 CFR Part 44 govern the application,
processing, and disposition of petitions
for modification. This notice is a
summary of petitions for modification
filed by the parties listed below to
modify the application of existing
mandatory safety standards published
in Title 30 of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
DATES: All comments on the petitions
must be received by the Office of
Standards, Regulations and Variances
on or before April 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: StandardsPetitions@dol.gov.
2. Facsimile: 1–202–693–9441.
3. Regular Mail: MSHA, Office of
Standards, Regulations and Variances,
1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350,
Arlington, Virginia 22209, Attention:
Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations and Variances.
4. Hand-Delivery or Courier: MSHA,
Office of Standards, Regulations and
Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209,
Attention: Patricia W. Silvey, Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations and
Variances.
MSHA will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
Individuals who submit comments by
hand-delivery are required to check in
at the receptionist desk on the 21st
floor.
Individuals may inspect copies of the
petitions and comments during normal
business hours at the address listed
above.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Mar 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations and Variances at 202–693–
9447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(E-mail), or 202–693–9441 (Telefax).
[These are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
other mine if the Secretary determines
that: (1) An alternative method of
achieving the result of such standard
exists which will at all times guarantee
no less than the same measure of
protection afforded the miners of such
mine by such standard; or (2) that the
application of such standard to such
mine will result in a diminution of
safety to the miners in such mine. In
addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2009–064–C.
Petitioner: Omega Mining, Inc., P.O.
Box 929, Honaker, Virginia 24260.
Mine: Beehive Mine, MSHA I.D. No.
44–05411 and Hatfield Mine, MSHA I.D.
No. 44–07104, located in Russell
County, Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1506(c)(1) (Refuge alternatives).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit an alternative
method to maintain a refuge alternative
to within 1,000 feet of the working face
but be allowed to develop a maximum
200 feet inby the 1,000 foot location
prior to the installation of the refuge
alternative to its Beehive and Hatfield
Mines. This will allow the refuge
alternative to be installed adjacent to the
loading point of the active section while
not interfering with ventilation or
haulage. The petitioner states that: (1)
Both the aforementioned underground
mining operations have an approved
Emergency Response Plan with MSHA
through District 5; (2) the mining height
at both operations averages 42 to 48
inches in overall height; (3) each mine
utilizes refuge alternatives (safe havens)
constructed of 15 psi block stoppings
provided with 15 psi rated metal doors
to access the internal area of the refuge
alternative; (4) breathable air is supplied
by a surface mounted portable fan to
each established refuge alternative
through pre-drilled vertical boreholes;
(5) the breathable air system is a forced
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
air system designed to maintain positive
pressure within the refuge alternative at
all times; (6) this system is designed to
sustain personnel for an indefinite
period of time, easily exceeding 96
hours; (7) the borehole design allows for
introduction of additional
communications, water, food, and
correspondence between the surface and
underground through letters or other
means; (8) the depth of the vertical
boreholes should not exceed 300 to 400
feet; (9) strategic surface locations are
necessary for providing adequate
placement of the boreholes in relation to
active underground workings.
Flexibility for positioning surface to
mine location is very important; (10)
constructed refuge alternatives are
located in a crosscut entry between the
primary and secondary escapeways; (11)
each person on the working section is
provided with an approved 1 hour SCSR
(self-contained self-rescuer) and an
approved 10 minute SCSR. An
additional approved 1 hour SCSR is
provided in the refuge alternative; (12)
the modification to the timing of the
installation for the working section
refuge alternative will not interfere or
affect the service and maintenance of
the outby refuge alternatives; (13) both
of these mines have been in operation
for over 5 years and has no record of
methane liberation at any time; and (14)
all other requirements of the Emergency
Response Plan and the Mine Emergency
Evacuation and Firefighting Program of
Instruction will be complied with. The
petitioner asserts that the alternative
method will at all times provide the
same measure of protection for the
miners as the existing standard while
eliminating the need for portable type
refuge alternatives, and will also allow
for safe and sound development of the
working face in a limited amount of
time and distance where ventilation and
haulage will not be interfered upon.
Docket Number: M–2009–065–C.
Petitioner: Blue Diamond Coal
Company, P.O. Box 47, Slemp,
Kentucky 41763.
Mine: No. 75 Mine, MSHA I. D. No.
15–17478, located in Perry County,
Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.513
(Electric conductor; capacity and
insulation).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit use of smaller cables
than allowed by the National Electric
Code for 480 Volt AC 250 H.P. and 300
H.P. head drive motors. The petitioner
states that: (1) In lieu of a 350 MCM
cable for a 300 H.P. Head Drive motor
and a 250 MCM cable for a 250 H.P.
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 17, 2010 / Notices
Head Drive motor, a 4/0, 90 deg. C.
ICEA cable with an ampacity of 329
amps at 20 deg. C ambient will be used;
(2) additional protection will be
provided for this cable by providing
overload devices for the drive motor
that are set to pick up at no more than
the ampacity of the cable; (3) a 400 amp
thermal magnetic breaker will be
provided at the beginning of the branch
circuit at the power center to protect the
cable to no more than 125% of its
ampacity; (4) motor circuits will be
checked for overload by a handheld
ammeter to ensure that the cable
ampacity is sufficient periodically
during belt advancement and once the
belt line length is permanently
established; (5) short circuit protection
for the motor will continue to be set
between 700%–1300% of the motor full
load amps, unless a high efficiency
motor is used and will not start at these
settings. In no case will the motor’s
short circuit protection be set higher
than is currently allowed by the
National Electric Code; (6) means will
be provided to prevent the motor branch
circuit cables from being installed into
another circuit breaker that is not a 400
amp thermal magnetic breaker. A
warning label will be placed on the belt
drive disconnect indicating ‘‘400 amp
thermal magnetic only’’. Otherwise an
equivalent circuit breaker with the
correct settings will be provided at the
power center as the head drive spare;
and (7) within sixty (60) days after this
petition is granted, the petitioner will
submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR Part 48, Subpart A
training plan to the District Manager.
The petitioner further states that the
proposed alternative method will not be
implemented until miners have been
trained in the proper installation of
these circuits and proper examinations
to ensure they are maintained. Training
will include the following: (a) Training
in hazards associated with incorrect
circuit breaker setting to protect power
cables; (b) training in how to verify that
circuit breakers are properly set and
maintained; (c) training in how to
protect power cables from damage; and
(d) training in the proper procedures for
examining power cables to ensure the
cables are in safe operating condition.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed
alternative method will at all times
guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection to all miners at Blue
Diamond Coal Company provided by
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2009–066–C.
Petitioner: Blue Diamond Coal
Company, P.O. Box 47, Slemp,
Kentucky 41763.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Mar 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
Mine: No. 81 Mine, MSHA I. D. No.
15–12753, located in Leslie County,
Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.513
(Electric conductor; capacity and
insulation).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit use of smaller cables
than allowed by the National Electric
Code for 480 Volt AC 250 H.P. and 300
H.P. head drive motors. The petitioner
states that: (1) In lieu of a 350 MCM
cable for a 300 H.P. Head Drive motor
and a 250 MCM cable for a 250 H.P.
Head Drive motor, a 4/0, 90 deg. C.
ICEA cable with an ampacity of 329
amps at 20 deg. C ambient will be used;
(2) additional protection will be
provided for this cable by providing
overload devices for the drive motor
that are set to pick up at no more than
the ampacity of the cable; (3) a 400 amp
thermal magnetic breaker will be
provided at the beginning of the branch
circuit at the power center to protect the
cable to no more than 125% of its
ampacity; (4) motor circuits will be
checked for overload by a handheld
ammeter to ensure that the cable
ampacity is sufficient periodically
during belt advancement and once the
belt line length is permanently
established; (5) short circuit protection
for the motor will continue to be set
between 700%–1300% of the motor full
load amps, unless a high efficiency
motor is used and will not start at these
settings. In no case will the motor’s
short circuit protection be set higher
than is currently allowed by the
National Electric Code; (6) means will
be provided to prevent the motor branch
circuit cables from being installed into
another circuit breaker that is not a 400
amp thermal magnetic breaker. A
warning label will be placed on the belt
drive disconnect indicating ‘‘400 amp
thermal magnetic only’’. Otherwise an
equivalent circuit breaker with the
correct settings will be provided at the
power center as the head drive spare;
and (7) within sixty (60) days after this
petition is granted, the petitioner will
submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR Part 48, Subpart A
training plan to the District Manager.
The petitioner further states that the
proposed alternative method will not be
implemented until miners have been
trained in the proper installation of
these circuits and proper examinations
to ensure they are maintained. Training
will include the following: (a) Training
in hazards associated with incorrect
circuit breaker setting to protect power
cables; (b) training in how to verify that
circuit breakers are properly set and
maintained; (c) training in how to
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12801
protect power cables from damage; and
(d) training in the proper procedures for
examining power cables to ensure the
cables are in safe operating condition.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed
alternative method will at all times
guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection to all miners at Blue
Diamond Coal Company provided by
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2009–067–C.
Petitioner: Blue Diamond Coal
Company, P.O. Box 47, Slemp,
Kentucky 41763.
Mine: No. 77 Mine, MSHA I.D. No.
15–09636, located in Perry County,
Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.513
(Electric conductor; capacity and
insulation).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit use of smaller cables
than allowed by the National Electric
Code for 480 Volt AC 250 H.P. and 300
H.P. head drive motors. The petitioner
states that: (1) In lieu of a 350 MCM
cable for a 300 H.P. Head Drive motor
and a 250 MCM cable for a 250 H.P.
Head Drive motor, a 4/0, 90 deg. C.
ICEA cable with an ampacity of 329
amps at 20 deg. C ambient will be used;
(2) additional protection will be
provided for this cable by providing
overload devices for the drive motor
that are set to pick up at no more than
the ampacity of the cable; (3) a 400 amp
thermal magnetic breaker will be
provided at the beginning of the branch
circuit at the power center to protect the
cable to no more than 125% of its
ampacity; (4) motor circuits will be
checked for overload by a handheld
ammeter to ensure that the cable
ampacity is sufficient periodically
during belt advancement and once the
belt line length is permanently
established; (5) short circuit protection
for the motor will continue to be set
between 700%–1300% of the motor full
load amps, unless a high efficiency
motor is used and will not start at these
settings. In no case will the motor’s
short circuit protection be set higher
than is currently allowed by the
National Electric Code; (6) means will
be provided to prevent the motor branch
circuit cables from being installed into
another circuit breaker that is not a 400
amp thermal magnetic breaker. A
warning label will be placed on the belt
drive disconnect indicating ‘‘400 amp
thermal magnetic only’’. Otherwise an
equivalent circuit breaker with the
correct settings will be provided at the
power center as the head drive spare;
and (7) within sixty (60) days after this
petition is granted, the petitioner will
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
12802
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 17, 2010 / Notices
submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR Part 48, Subpart A
training plan to the District Manager.
The petitioner further states that the
proposed alternative method will not be
implemented until miners have been
trained in the proper installation of
these circuits and proper examinations
to ensure they are maintained. Training
will include the following: (a) Training
in hazards associated with incorrect
circuit breaker setting to protect power
cables; (b) training in how to verify that
circuit breakers are properly set and
maintained; (c) training in how to
protect power cables from damage; and
(d) training in the proper procedures for
examining power cables to ensure the
cables are in safe operating condition.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed
alternative method will at all times
guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection to all miners at Blue
Diamond Coal Company provided by
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2009–068–C.
Petitioner: Leeco Coal Company, P.O.
Box 309, Jeff, Kentucky 41751.
Mine: No. 68 Mine, MSHA I.D. No.
15–17497, located in Perry County,
Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.513
(Electric conductor; capacity and
insulation).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit use of smaller cables
than allowed by the National Electric
Code for 480 Volt AC 250 H.P. and 300
H.P. head drive motors. The petitioner
states that: (1) In lieu of a 350 MCM
cable for a 300 H.P. Head Drive motor
and a 250 MCM cable for a 250 H.P.
Head Drive motor, a 4/0, 90 deg. C.
ICEA cable with an ampacity of 329
amps at 20 deg. C ambient will be used;
(2) additional protection will be
provided for this cable by providing
overload devices for the drive motor
that are set to pick up at no more than
the ampacity of the cable; (3) a 400 amp
thermal magnetic breaker will be
provided at the beginning of the branch
circuit at the power center to protect the
cable to no more than 125% of its
ampacity; (4) motor circuits will be
checked for overload by a handheld
ammeter to ensure that the cable
ampacity is sufficient periodically
during belt advancement and once the
belt line length is permanently
established; (5) short circuit protection
for the motor will continue to be set
between 700%-1300% of the motor full
load amps, unless a high efficiency
motor is used and will not start at these
settings. In no case will the motor’s
short circuit protection be set higher
than is currently allowed by the
National Electric Code; (6) means will
be provided to prevent the motor branch
circuit cables from being installed into
another circuit breaker that is not a 400
amp thermal magnetic breaker. A
warning label will be placed on the belt
drive disconnect indicating ‘‘400 amp
thermal magnetic only’’. Otherwise an
equivalent circuit breaker with the
correct settings will be provided at the
power center as the head drive spare;
and (7) within sixty (60) days after this
petition is granted, the petitioner will
submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR Part 48, Subpart A
training plan to the District Manager.
The petitioner further states that the
proposed alternative method will not be
implemented until miners have been
trained in the proper installation of
these circuits and proper examinations
to ensure they are maintained. Training
will include the following: (a) Training
in hazards associated with incorrect
circuit breaker setting to protect power
cables; (b) training in how to verify that
circuit breakers are properly set and
maintained; (c) training in how to
protect power cables from damage; and
(d) training in the proper procedures for
examining power cables to ensure the
cables are in safe operating condition.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed
alternative method will at all times
guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection to all miners at Leeco Coal
Company provided by the existing
standard.
Dated: March 12, 2010.
Patricia W. Silvey,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and
Variances.
[FR Doc. 2010–5786 Filed 3–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
Notice of Availability of Calendar Year
2011 Competitive Grant Funds
Legal Services Corporation.
Solicitation for Proposals for the
Provision of Civil Legal Services.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Legal Services
Corporation (LSC) is the national
organization charged with administering
Federal funds provided for civil legal
services to low-income people.
State
15:08 Mar 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for grants competition dates.
ADDRESSES: Legal Services
Corporation—Competitive Grants, 3333
K Street, NW., Third Floor, Washington,
DC 20007–3522.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Program Performance by e-mail
at competition@lsc.gov, or visit the
grants competition Web site at https://
www.grants.lsc.gov.
DATES:
The
Request for Proposals (RFP) will be
available April 8 2010. Applicants must
file a Notice of Intent to Compete (NIC)
to participate in the competitive grants
process. Applicants must file the NIC by
May 13 2010, 5 p.m. E.D.T. The due
date for filing grant proposals is June 7
2010, 5: p.m. E.D.T.
LSC is seeking proposals from: (1)
Non-profit organizations that have as a
purpose the provision of legal assistance
to eligible clients; (2) private attorneys;
(3) groups of private attorneys or law
firms; (4) State or local governments;
and (5) sub-state regional planning and
coordination agencies that are
composed of sub-state areas and whose
governing boards are controlled by
locally elected officials.
The RFP, containing the NIC and
grant application, guidelines, proposal
content requirements, service area
descriptions, and specific selection
criteria, will be available from https://
www.grants.lsc.gov April 8, 2010. LSC
will not fax the RFP to interested
parties.
Below are the service areas for which
LSC is requesting grant proposals.
Service area descriptions will be
available from Appendix A of the RFP.
LSC will post all updates and/or
changes to this notice at https://
www.grants.lsc.gov. Interested parties
are asked to visit https://
www.grants.lsc.gov regularly for updates
on the LSC competitive grants process.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Service area
Alabama ....................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
LSC hereby announces the availability
of competitive grant funds and is
soliciting grant proposals from
interested parties who are qualified to
provide effective, efficient, and high
quality civil legal services to eligible
clients in the service area(s) of the states
and territories identified below. The
exact amount of congressionally
appropriated funds and the date, terms,
and conditions of their availability for
calendar year 2011 have not been
determined.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
MAL
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12800-12802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5786]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of petitions for modification of existing mandatory
safety standards.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977 and 30 CFR Part 44 govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification. This notice is a summary of
petitions for modification filed by the parties listed below to modify
the application of existing mandatory safety standards published in
Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
DATES: All comments on the petitions must be received by the Office of
Standards, Regulations and Variances on or before April 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: Standards-Petitions@dol.gov.
2. Facsimile: 1-202-693-9441.
3. Regular Mail: MSHA, Office of Standards, Regulations and
Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209,
Attention: Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of Standards,
Regulations and Variances.
4. Hand-Delivery or Courier: MSHA, Office of Standards, Regulations
and Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia
22209, Attention: Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of Standards,
Regulations and Variances.
MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments. Individuals
who submit comments by hand-delivery are required to check in at the
receptionist desk on the 21st floor.
Individuals may inspect copies of the petitions and comments during
normal business hours at the address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations and Variances at 202-693-9447 (Voice),
barron.barbara@dol.gov (E-mail), or 202-693-9441 (Telefax). [These are
not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary determines that: (1) An
alternative method of achieving the result of such standard exists
which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of
protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or (2)
that the application of such standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in such mine. In addition, the
regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish the requirements and
procedures for filing petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M-2009-064-C.
Petitioner: Omega Mining, Inc., P.O. Box 929, Honaker, Virginia
24260.
Mine: Beehive Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 44-05411 and Hatfield Mine, MSHA
I.D. No. 44-07104, located in Russell County, Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1506(c)(1) (Refuge alternatives).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit an alternative method to maintain a refuge
alternative to within 1,000 feet of the working face but be allowed to
develop a maximum 200 feet inby the 1,000 foot location prior to the
installation of the refuge alternative to its Beehive and Hatfield
Mines. This will allow the refuge alternative to be installed adjacent
to the loading point of the active section while not interfering with
ventilation or haulage. The petitioner states that: (1) Both the
aforementioned underground mining operations have an approved Emergency
Response Plan with MSHA through District 5; (2) the mining height at
both operations averages 42 to 48 inches in overall height; (3) each
mine utilizes refuge alternatives (safe havens) constructed of 15 psi
block stoppings provided with 15 psi rated metal doors to access the
internal area of the refuge alternative; (4) breathable air is supplied
by a surface mounted portable fan to each established refuge
alternative through pre-drilled vertical boreholes; (5) the breathable
air system is a forced air system designed to maintain positive
pressure within the refuge alternative at all times; (6) this system is
designed to sustain personnel for an indefinite period of time, easily
exceeding 96 hours; (7) the borehole design allows for introduction of
additional communications, water, food, and correspondence between the
surface and underground through letters or other means; (8) the depth
of the vertical boreholes should not exceed 300 to 400 feet; (9)
strategic surface locations are necessary for providing adequate
placement of the boreholes in relation to active underground workings.
Flexibility for positioning surface to mine location is very important;
(10) constructed refuge alternatives are located in a crosscut entry
between the primary and secondary escapeways; (11) each person on the
working section is provided with an approved 1 hour SCSR (self-
contained self-rescuer) and an approved 10 minute SCSR. An additional
approved 1 hour SCSR is provided in the refuge alternative; (12) the
modification to the timing of the installation for the working section
refuge alternative will not interfere or affect the service and
maintenance of the outby refuge alternatives; (13) both of these mines
have been in operation for over 5 years and has no record of methane
liberation at any time; and (14) all other requirements of the
Emergency Response Plan and the Mine Emergency Evacuation and
Firefighting Program of Instruction will be complied with. The
petitioner asserts that the alternative method will at all times
provide the same measure of protection for the miners as the existing
standard while eliminating the need for portable type refuge
alternatives, and will also allow for safe and sound development of the
working face in a limited amount of time and distance where ventilation
and haulage will not be interfered upon.
Docket Number: M-2009-065-C.
Petitioner: Blue Diamond Coal Company, P.O. Box 47, Slemp, Kentucky
41763.
Mine: No. 75 Mine, MSHA I. D. No. 15-17478, located in Perry
County, Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.513 (Electric conductor; capacity
and insulation).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit use of smaller cables than allowed by the
National Electric Code for 480 Volt AC 250 H.P. and 300 H.P. head drive
motors. The petitioner states that: (1) In lieu of a 350 MCM cable for
a 300 H.P. Head Drive motor and a 250 MCM cable for a 250 H.P.
[[Page 12801]]
Head Drive motor, a 4/0, 90 deg. C. ICEA cable with an ampacity of 329
amps at 20 deg. C ambient will be used; (2) additional protection will
be provided for this cable by providing overload devices for the drive
motor that are set to pick up at no more than the ampacity of the
cable; (3) a 400 amp thermal magnetic breaker will be provided at the
beginning of the branch circuit at the power center to protect the
cable to no more than 125% of its ampacity; (4) motor circuits will be
checked for overload by a handheld ammeter to ensure that the cable
ampacity is sufficient periodically during belt advancement and once
the belt line length is permanently established; (5) short circuit
protection for the motor will continue to be set between 700%-1300% of
the motor full load amps, unless a high efficiency motor is used and
will not start at these settings. In no case will the motor's short
circuit protection be set higher than is currently allowed by the
National Electric Code; (6) means will be provided to prevent the motor
branch circuit cables from being installed into another circuit breaker
that is not a 400 amp thermal magnetic breaker. A warning label will be
placed on the belt drive disconnect indicating ``400 amp thermal
magnetic only''. Otherwise an equivalent circuit breaker with the
correct settings will be provided at the power center as the head drive
spare; and (7) within sixty (60) days after this petition is granted,
the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for its approved 30 CFR
Part 48, Subpart A training plan to the District Manager. The
petitioner further states that the proposed alternative method will not
be implemented until miners have been trained in the proper
installation of these circuits and proper examinations to ensure they
are maintained. Training will include the following: (a) Training in
hazards associated with incorrect circuit breaker setting to protect
power cables; (b) training in how to verify that circuit breakers are
properly set and maintained; (c) training in how to protect power
cables from damage; and (d) training in the proper procedures for
examining power cables to ensure the cables are in safe operating
condition. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method
will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection
to all miners at Blue Diamond Coal Company provided by the existing
standard.
Docket Number: M-2009-066-C.
Petitioner: Blue Diamond Coal Company, P.O. Box 47, Slemp, Kentucky
41763.
Mine: No. 81 Mine, MSHA I. D. No. 15-12753, located in Leslie
County, Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.513 (Electric conductor; capacity
and insulation).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit use of smaller cables than allowed by the
National Electric Code for 480 Volt AC 250 H.P. and 300 H.P. head drive
motors. The petitioner states that: (1) In lieu of a 350 MCM cable for
a 300 H.P. Head Drive motor and a 250 MCM cable for a 250 H.P. Head
Drive motor, a 4/0, 90 deg. C. ICEA cable with an ampacity of 329 amps
at 20 deg. C ambient will be used; (2) additional protection will be
provided for this cable by providing overload devices for the drive
motor that are set to pick up at no more than the ampacity of the
cable; (3) a 400 amp thermal magnetic breaker will be provided at the
beginning of the branch circuit at the power center to protect the
cable to no more than 125% of its ampacity; (4) motor circuits will be
checked for overload by a handheld ammeter to ensure that the cable
ampacity is sufficient periodically during belt advancement and once
the belt line length is permanently established; (5) short circuit
protection for the motor will continue to be set between 700%-1300% of
the motor full load amps, unless a high efficiency motor is used and
will not start at these settings. In no case will the motor's short
circuit protection be set higher than is currently allowed by the
National Electric Code; (6) means will be provided to prevent the motor
branch circuit cables from being installed into another circuit breaker
that is not a 400 amp thermal magnetic breaker. A warning label will be
placed on the belt drive disconnect indicating ``400 amp thermal
magnetic only''. Otherwise an equivalent circuit breaker with the
correct settings will be provided at the power center as the head drive
spare; and (7) within sixty (60) days after this petition is granted,
the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for its approved 30 CFR
Part 48, Subpart A training plan to the District Manager. The
petitioner further states that the proposed alternative method will not
be implemented until miners have been trained in the proper
installation of these circuits and proper examinations to ensure they
are maintained. Training will include the following: (a) Training in
hazards associated with incorrect circuit breaker setting to protect
power cables; (b) training in how to verify that circuit breakers are
properly set and maintained; (c) training in how to protect power
cables from damage; and (d) training in the proper procedures for
examining power cables to ensure the cables are in safe operating
condition. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method
will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection
to all miners at Blue Diamond Coal Company provided by the existing
standard.
Docket Number: M-2009-067-C.
Petitioner: Blue Diamond Coal Company, P.O. Box 47, Slemp, Kentucky
41763.
Mine: No. 77 Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 15-09636, located in Perry County,
Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.513 (Electric conductor; capacity
and insulation).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit use of smaller cables than allowed by the
National Electric Code for 480 Volt AC 250 H.P. and 300 H.P. head drive
motors. The petitioner states that: (1) In lieu of a 350 MCM cable for
a 300 H.P. Head Drive motor and a 250 MCM cable for a 250 H.P. Head
Drive motor, a 4/0, 90 deg. C. ICEA cable with an ampacity of 329 amps
at 20 deg. C ambient will be used; (2) additional protection will be
provided for this cable by providing overload devices for the drive
motor that are set to pick up at no more than the ampacity of the
cable; (3) a 400 amp thermal magnetic breaker will be provided at the
beginning of the branch circuit at the power center to protect the
cable to no more than 125% of its ampacity; (4) motor circuits will be
checked for overload by a handheld ammeter to ensure that the cable
ampacity is sufficient periodically during belt advancement and once
the belt line length is permanently established; (5) short circuit
protection for the motor will continue to be set between 700%-1300% of
the motor full load amps, unless a high efficiency motor is used and
will not start at these settings. In no case will the motor's short
circuit protection be set higher than is currently allowed by the
National Electric Code; (6) means will be provided to prevent the motor
branch circuit cables from being installed into another circuit breaker
that is not a 400 amp thermal magnetic breaker. A warning label will be
placed on the belt drive disconnect indicating ``400 amp thermal
magnetic only''. Otherwise an equivalent circuit breaker with the
correct settings will be provided at the power center as the head drive
spare; and (7) within sixty (60) days after this petition is granted,
the petitioner will
[[Page 12802]]
submit proposed revisions for its approved 30 CFR Part 48, Subpart A
training plan to the District Manager. The petitioner further states
that the proposed alternative method will not be implemented until
miners have been trained in the proper installation of these circuits
and proper examinations to ensure they are maintained. Training will
include the following: (a) Training in hazards associated with
incorrect circuit breaker setting to protect power cables; (b) training
in how to verify that circuit breakers are properly set and maintained;
(c) training in how to protect power cables from damage; and (d)
training in the proper procedures for examining power cables to ensure
the cables are in safe operating condition. The petitioner asserts that
the proposed alternative method will at all times guarantee no less
than the same measure of protection to all miners at Blue Diamond Coal
Company provided by the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2009-068-C.
Petitioner: Leeco Coal Company, P.O. Box 309, Jeff, Kentucky 41751.
Mine: No. 68 Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 15-17497, located in Perry County,
Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.513 (Electric conductor; capacity
and insulation).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit use of smaller cables than allowed by the
National Electric Code for 480 Volt AC 250 H.P. and 300 H.P. head drive
motors. The petitioner states that: (1) In lieu of a 350 MCM cable for
a 300 H.P. Head Drive motor and a 250 MCM cable for a 250 H.P. Head
Drive motor, a 4/0, 90 deg. C. ICEA cable with an ampacity of 329 amps
at 20 deg. C ambient will be used; (2) additional protection will be
provided for this cable by providing overload devices for the drive
motor that are set to pick up at no more than the ampacity of the
cable; (3) a 400 amp thermal magnetic breaker will be provided at the
beginning of the branch circuit at the power center to protect the
cable to no more than 125% of its ampacity; (4) motor circuits will be
checked for overload by a handheld ammeter to ensure that the cable
ampacity is sufficient periodically during belt advancement and once
the belt line length is permanently established; (5) short circuit
protection for the motor will continue to be set between 700%-1300% of
the motor full load amps, unless a high efficiency motor is used and
will not start at these settings. In no case will the motor's short
circuit protection be set higher than is currently allowed by the
National Electric Code; (6) means will be provided to prevent the motor
branch circuit cables from being installed into another circuit breaker
that is not a 400 amp thermal magnetic breaker. A warning label will be
placed on the belt drive disconnect indicating ``400 amp thermal
magnetic only''. Otherwise an equivalent circuit breaker with the
correct settings will be provided at the power center as the head drive
spare; and (7) within sixty (60) days after this petition is granted,
the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for its approved 30 CFR
Part 48, Subpart A training plan to the District Manager. The
petitioner further states that the proposed alternative method will not
be implemented until miners have been trained in the proper
installation of these circuits and proper examinations to ensure they
are maintained. Training will include the following: (a) Training in
hazards associated with incorrect circuit breaker setting to protect
power cables; (b) training in how to verify that circuit breakers are
properly set and maintained; (c) training in how to protect power
cables from damage; and (d) training in the proper procedures for
examining power cables to ensure the cables are in safe operating
condition. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method
will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection
to all miners at Leeco Coal Company provided by the existing standard.
Dated: March 12, 2010.
Patricia W. Silvey,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2010-5786 Filed 3-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P