In the Matter of: Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 11909-11910 [2010-5414]

Download as PDF srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 48 / Friday, March 12, 2010 / Notices Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list. Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in the final phase of these investigations available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the investigations, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days prior to the hearing date specified in this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the investigations. A party granted access to BPI in the preliminary phase of the investigations need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report. The prehearing staff report in the final phase of these investigations will be placed in the nonpublic record on June 25, 2010, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.22 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing. The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the final phase of these investigations beginning at 9:30 a.m. on July 15, 2010, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before July 8, 2010. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on July 9, 2010, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions. Each party who is an interested party shall submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.23 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is July 7, 2010. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:18 Mar 11, 2010 Jkt 220001 provisions of section 207.25 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is July 22, 2010; witness testimony must be filed no later than three days before the hearing. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the investigations may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the investigations, including statements of support or opposition to the petition, on or before July 22, 2010. On August 6, 2010, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before August 10, 2010, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.30 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II(C) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigations must be served on all other parties to the investigations (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: March 8, 2010. PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11909 By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–5416 Filed 3–11–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–664] In the Matter of: Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants’ Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 35) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainants’ unopposed motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on December 18, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Spansion, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California and Spansion LLC of Sunnyvale, California (collectively, ‘‘Spansion’’). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM 12MRN1 11910 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 48 / Friday, March 12, 2010 / Notices sale within the United States after importation of certain flash memory chips and products containing the same by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,380,029, 6,080,639, 6,376,877, and 5,715,194. The complaint names over thirty respondents including Lenovo Group Limited of Hong Kong (‘‘LGL’’); Lenovo (Beijing) Limited of China (‘‘LBL’’); International Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of China (‘‘IIPC’’); Lenovo (Huiyang) Electronic Industrial Co., Ltd. of China (‘‘LEIC’’); Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co., Ltd. of China (‘‘SLE’’); Sony Corporation of America of New York, New York (‘‘SCA’’); and Kingston Technology Far East (Malaysia), Sdn. Bhd. of Malaysia (‘‘Kingston Malaysia’’). On January 28, 2010, Spansion filed an unopposed motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to add Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore and Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California as respondents to the investigation. Spansion also moved to dismiss Respondents LGL, LBL, IIPC, LEIC, SLE, SCA, and Kingston Malaysia from the investigation. On February 23, 2010, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 35) granting Spansion’s motion. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), good cause exists for the requested amendments to the complaint and notice of investigation. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Issued: March 8, 2010. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–5414 Filed 3–11–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES [OMB Number 1105–0030] Justice Management Division; Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management; Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Renewal of Previously Approved Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 60-day notice of information collection under review: Electronic VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:18 Mar 11, 2010 Jkt 220001 applications for the Attorney General’s Honors Program and the Summer Law Intern Program. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Justice Management Division, Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management (OARM), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until May 11, 2010. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530. Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to 202– 395–7285. Comments may also be submitted to the Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this information collection: PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (1) Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved collection. (2) The title of the form/collection: Electronic Applications for the Attorney General’s Honors Program and the Summer Law Intern Program. (3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the department sponsoring the collection: Form Number: none. Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management, Justice Management Division, U.S. Department of Justice. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Individuals or households. Other: None. The application form is submitted voluntarily, once a year by law students and judicial law clerks who will be in this applicant pool only once; the revision to this collection concerns two additional forms required to be submitted only by those applicants who were selected to be interviewed by DOJ components. Both of these forms seek information in order to prepare both the official Travel Authorizations prior to the interviewees’ performing preemployment interview travel (as defined by 41 CFR 301–1.3), and the official Travel Vouchers after the travel is completed. The first new form is the Travel Survey—used by the Department in scheduling travel and/or hotel accommodations, which in turn provides the estimated travel costs required by the Travel Authorization form. The second new form is a simple Reimbursement Form—the interviewees are asked to provide their travel costs and/or hotel accommodations (if applicable) in order for the Department to prepare the Travel Vouchers required before these interviewees can be reimbursed by the Department for the authorized costs they incurred during this pre-employment interview travel. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: It is estimated that 5000 respondents will complete the application in approximately 1 hour per application. The revised burden would include 600 respondents who will complete the travel survey in approximately 10 minutes per form, and 600 respondents who will complete the reimbursement form in approximately 10 minutes per form. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: The estimated revised total annual public burden associated with this application is 5200 hours. If additional information is required, please contact Lynn Bryant, Department E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM 12MRN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 48 (Friday, March 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11909-11910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5414]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-664]


In the Matter of: Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products 
Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an 
Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion To Amend 
the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 35) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting complainants' unopposed motion to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on December 18, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Spansion, Inc. of 
Sunnyvale, California and Spansion LLC of Sunnyvale, California 
(collectively, ``Spansion''). The complaint alleges violations of 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the

[[Page 11910]]

sale within the United States after importation of certain flash memory 
chips and products containing the same by reason of infringement of 
various claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,380,029, 6,080,639, 
6,376,877, and 5,715,194. The complaint names over thirty respondents 
including Lenovo Group Limited of Hong Kong (``LGL''); Lenovo (Beijing) 
Limited of China (``LBL''); International Information Products 
(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of China (``IIPC''); Lenovo (Huiyang) Electronic 
Industrial Co., Ltd. of China (``LEIC''); Shanghai Lenovo Electronic 
Co., Ltd. of China (``SLE''); Sony Corporation of America of New York, 
New York (``SCA''); and Kingston Technology Far East (Malaysia), Sdn. 
Bhd. of Malaysia (``Kingston Malaysia'').
    On January 28, 2010, Spansion filed an unopposed motion to amend 
the complaint and notice of investigation to add Lenovo (Singapore) 
Pte. Ltd. of Singapore and Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, 
California as respondents to the investigation. Spansion also moved to 
dismiss Respondents LGL, LBL, IIPC, LEIC, SLE, SCA, and Kingston 
Malaysia from the investigation.
    On February 23, 2010, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 35) 
granting Spansion's motion. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission 
Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), good cause exists for the 
requested amendments to the complaint and notice of investigation. None 
of the parties petitioned for review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    Issued: March 8, 2010.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-5414 Filed 3-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.