In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Rescind a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders, 10311-10312 [2010-4692]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 2010 / Notices managing the habitat to promote persistence of the butterfly, and the assurances they have received under the current conservation program would cease. Landowners who wish to proactively conserve their land to promote recovery of the butterfly in Wisconsin would need their own permits under Section 10, with an HCP or Safe Harbor Agreement for their lands. Reviewing Documents and Submitting Comments Please refer to TE010064 when requesting documents or submitting comments. The permit application and supporting documents (updated draft HCP and draft EA) may be obtained on the Internet at the following address: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/ endangered/permits/hcp/r3hcps.html. In addition, the original HCP, dated March 2000, may be viewed on the Wisconsin DNR Web site at http:// dnr.wi.gov/forestry/karner/. Persons without access to the Internet may obtain copies of the documents (application, updated draft HCP, and draft EA) by contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Field Office, 2661 Scott Tower Drive, New Franken, WI 54229–9565 (920/866–1717, voice; 920/866–1710, fax). The documents will also be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) at the Ecological Services Field Office in New Franken and at the Service’s Regional Office, Ecological Services, Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building, 1 Federal Drive, 6th Floor, Ft. Snelling, MN 55111 (612/713–5164, voice; 612/ 713–5292, fax). Written comments will be accepted as described above. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Public Availability of Comments Written comments we receive become part of the public record associated with this action. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that the entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Authority : We provide this notice under section 10(c) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22), and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4371 et VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:45 Mar 04, 2010 Jkt 220001 seq.) and its implementing regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). T.J. Miller, Acting, Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. [FR Doc. 2010–4708 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–631] In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Rescind a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to rescind the limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders issued in the abovecaptioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint A. Gerdine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on January 25, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (‘‘Samsung’’) of Korea. 73 FR 4626–27. The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10311 certain liquid crystal display (‘‘LCD’’) devices and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,193,666; 6,771,344 (‘‘the ‘344 patent’’); 7,295,196; and 6,937,311 (‘‘the ‘311 patent’’). The complaint further alleged the existence of a domestic industry as to each asserted patent. The Commission’s notice of investigation named the following respondents: Sharp Corporation of Japan; Sharp Electronics Corporation of Mahwah, New Jersey; and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively, ‘‘Sharp’’). On January 26, 2009, the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued his final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) finding a violation of section 337 by respondents as to the ‘311 and ‘344 patents only, and issued his recommended determinations on remedy and bonding. On February 9, 2009, Sharp and the Commission investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed petitions for review of the final ID. The IA and Samsung filed responses to the petitions on February 17, 2009. On March 30, 2009, the Commission determined to review several of the ID’s findings, and requested the parties to respond to certain questions concerning those findings. The Commission also requested written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding from the parties and interested non-parties. 74 FR 15301–02 (April 3, 2009). On April 10 and April 17, 2009, respectively, complainant Samsung, the Sharp respondents, and the IA filed briefs and reply briefs on the issues for which the Commission requested written submissions. Also, the Commission received four submissions from interested non-parties on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. On June 24, 2009, the Commission issued notice of its determination to affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part the ID. The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s finding of a violation of section 337 with respect to claims 7 and 8 of the ‘344 patent, but reversed the ALJ’s finding of a violation with respect to the ‘311 patent. 74 FR 31311–12 (June 30, 2009) Further, the Commission issued (as modified on December 14, 2009): (1) A limited exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of LCD devices, including display panels and modules, and LCD televisions or professional displays containing the same that infringe claims 7 or 8 of the ‘344 patent, that are manufactured abroad by or on behalf of, or are imported by or on E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM 05MRN1 10312 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 2010 / Notices behalf of, Sharp, or any of its affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, or other related business entities, or successors or assigns; and (2) cease and desist orders prohibiting Sharp Electronics Corp. and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Co. from conducting any of the following activities in the United States: Importing, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing, offering for sale, transferring (except for exportation), and soliciting U.S. agents or distributors for, LCD devices, including display panels and modules, and LCD televisions or professional displays containing the same that are covered by claims 7 or 8 of the ‘344 patent. On February 12, 2010, complainant Samsung and respondent Sharp filed a joint petition to rescind the remedial orders under Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1) on the basis of a settlement agreement between the parties. The parties asserted that their settlement agreement constitutes ‘‘changed conditions of fact or law’’ sufficient to justify rescission of the order under Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR 210.76(a)(1). The IA did not oppose the joint petition. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Commission has determined that the settlement agreement satisfies the requirement of Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR 210.76(a)(1), that there be changed conditions of fact or law. The Commission therefore has issued an order rescinding the limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders previously issued in this investigation. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and section 210.76(a)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)). Issued: March 1, 2010. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Dated: February 26, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. BILLING CODE 4410–09–P Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration By Notice dated October 20, 2009, and published in the Federal Register on October 28, 2009 (74 FR 55583), Formulation Technologies LLC., 11501 Jkt 220001 Dated: February 26, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. 2010–4773 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [FR Doc. 2010–4722 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P Importer of Controlled Substances Notice of Registration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE By Notice dated October 21, 2009, and published in the Federal Register on October 28, 2009 (74 FR 55584), Hospira Inc., 1776 North Centennial Drive, McPherson, Kansas 67460–1247, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Remifentanil (9739), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II. The company plans to import Remifentanil for use in dosage form manufacturing. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the registration of Hospira Inc. to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international Drug Enforcement Administration By Notice dated November 23, 2009, and published in the Federal Register on December 2, 2009 (74 FR 63155), Cambrex Charles City, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 14:45 Mar 04, 2010 The company plans to import the basic classes of controlled substances for manufacture of active pharmaceutical ingredients for sale to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the registration of Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to import the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to ensure that the company’s registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company’s physical security systems, verification of the company’s compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company’s background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Importer of Controlled Substances Notice of Registration [FR Doc. 2010–4692 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am] VerDate Nov<24>2008 Domain Drive, Suite 130, Austin, Texas 78758, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Fentanyl (9801), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II. The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for analytical characterization, secondary packaging, and for distribution to clinical trial sites. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the registration of Formulation Technologies LLC., to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Formulation Technologies LLC., to ensure that the company’s registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company’s physical security systems, verification of the company’s compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company’s background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed. Drug Schedule Opium, raw (9600) ....................... Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670) PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 II II E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM 05MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10311-10312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4692]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-631]


In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and 
Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination To 
Rescind a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to rescind the limited exclusion order and 
cease and desist orders issued in the above-captioned investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint A. Gerdine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 25, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics 
Co., Ltd. (``Samsung'') of Korea. 73 FR 4626-27. The complaint, as 
supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain liquid crystal display (``LCD'') devices 
and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain 
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,193,666; 6,771,344 (``the `344 patent''); 
7,295,196; and 6,937,311 (``the `311 patent''). The complaint further 
alleged the existence of a domestic industry as to each asserted 
patent. The Commission's notice of investigation named the following 
respondents: Sharp Corporation of Japan; Sharp Electronics Corporation 
of Mahwah, New Jersey; and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of 
America, Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively, ``Sharp'').
    On January 26, 2009, the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') issued his final initial determination (``ID'') finding a 
violation of section 337 by respondents as to the `311 and `344 patents 
only, and issued his recommended determinations on remedy and bonding. 
On February 9, 2009, Sharp and the Commission investigative attorney 
(``IA'') filed petitions for review of the final ID. The IA and Samsung 
filed responses to the petitions on February 17, 2009.
    On March 30, 2009, the Commission determined to review several of 
the ID's findings, and requested the parties to respond to certain 
questions concerning those findings. The Commission also requested 
written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and 
bonding from the parties and interested non-parties. 74 FR 15301-02 
(April 3, 2009).
    On April 10 and April 17, 2009, respectively, complainant Samsung, 
the Sharp respondents, and the IA filed briefs and reply briefs on the 
issues for which the Commission requested written submissions. Also, 
the Commission received four submissions from interested non-parties on 
the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding.
    On June 24, 2009, the Commission issued notice of its determination 
to affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part the ID. The Commission affirmed 
the ALJ's finding of a violation of section 337 with respect to claims 
7 and 8 of the `344 patent, but reversed the ALJ's finding of a 
violation with respect to the `311 patent. 74 FR 31311-12 (June 30, 
2009)
    Further, the Commission issued (as modified on December 14, 2009): 
(1) A limited exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of LCD 
devices, including display panels and modules, and LCD televisions or 
professional displays containing the same that infringe claims 7 or 8 
of the `344 patent, that are manufactured abroad by or on behalf of, or 
are imported by or on

[[Page 10312]]

behalf of, Sharp, or any of its affiliated companies, parents, 
subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, or other related business 
entities, or successors or assigns; and (2) cease and desist orders 
prohibiting Sharp Electronics Corp. and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing 
Co. from conducting any of the following activities in the United 
States: Importing, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing, 
offering for sale, transferring (except for exportation), and 
soliciting U.S. agents or distributors for, LCD devices, including 
display panels and modules, and LCD televisions or professional 
displays containing the same that are covered by claims 7 or 8 of the 
`344 patent.
    On February 12, 2010, complainant Samsung and respondent Sharp 
filed a joint petition to rescind the remedial orders under Commission 
Rule 210.76(a)(1) on the basis of a settlement agreement between the 
parties. The parties asserted that their settlement agreement 
constitutes ``changed conditions of fact or law'' sufficient to justify 
rescission of the order under Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR 
210.76(a)(1). The IA did not oppose the joint petition.
    Having reviewed the parties' submissions, the Commission has 
determined that the settlement agreement satisfies the requirement of 
Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR 210.76(a)(1), that there be 
changed conditions of fact or law. The Commission therefore has issued 
an order rescinding the limited exclusion order and cease and desist 
orders previously issued in this investigation.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and section 210.76(a)(1) of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)).

    Issued: March 1, 2010.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-4692 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P