National Institute of Standards and Technology Construction Grant Program, 9392-9397 [2010-4286]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
• National Institute of Standards and Technology

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9392-9397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

RIN 0693-ZA95
[Docket No.: 100201057-0059-01]


National Institute of Standards and Technology Construction Grant 
Program

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of availability of funds.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 
announces that it is holding a competition for the NIST Construction 
Grant Program, and is soliciting proposals for financial assistance for 
FY 2010. The goals and objectives of the program are to provide 
competitively awarded grant funds for research science buildings 
through the construction of new buildings or expansion of existing 
buildings.

DATES: A Letter of Intent (Form NIST-1102) is required and must be 
received no later than 3 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday, March 29, 2010. The 
corresponding full proposal must be received no later than 3 p.m. 
Eastern Time, Monday, April 26, 2010. Review, selection, and grant 
award processing is expected to be completed in September 2010.

ADDRESSES: Letters of Intent may only be submitted by paper to: 
National Institute of Standards and Technology; Construction Grant 
Program; 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 4701; Gaithersburg, MD 20899-4701; 
Attn: Anneke Tingle--301-975-5060. The corresponding full proposals may 
be submitted by paper or electronically. Paper Submissions: National 
Institute of Standards and Technology; Construction Grant Program; 100 
Bureau Drive, Stop 4701; Gaithersburg, MD 20899-4701; Attn: Anneke 
Tingle--301-975-5060. Electronic submissions: https://www.grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Lambis at 301-975-4447 or by 
e-mail at barbara.lambis@nist.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Additional Information. The full Federal Funding Opportunity (FFO)

[[Page 9393]]

announcement for this request for proposals contains detailed 
information and requirements for the program. Applicants are strongly 
encouraged to read the FFO announcement in developing proposals. The 
full FFO announcement is available at https://www.grants.gov and on the 
NIST Web site at https://www.nist.gov/director/ncgp/.
    Statutory Authority. The statutory authority for this program is 
the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8) and Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117).
    CFDA. 11.618, NIST Construction Grant Program.
    Program Description. The Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 
111-8) appropriated $30 million to NIST ``for a competitive 
construction grant program for research science buildings. Additional 
information on the program provided in an Explanatory Statement 
published in the Congressional Record (which serves as the Conference 
Report) indicates that Congress intended to provide NIST $30,000,000 
for competitive construction grants for research science buildings. 
(See 155 Cong. Rec. H1735 (daily ed. Feb. 23, 2009).) The statement 
also indicates that ``grants shall be awarded to colleges, 
universities, and non-profit science research organizations on a merit 
basis. Additionally, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 
111-117) appropriated an additional $20 million to NIST for a 
competitive construction grant program for research science buildings.
    Pursuant to the statutory authorities cited above and in 
consideration of the legislative history, NIST publishes this notice to 
set forth the program goals and objectives, and to solicit Letters of 
Intent and full proposals for the NIST Construction Grant Program. The 
goals and objectives of the program are to provide competitively 
awarded grant funds for research science buildings through the 
construction of new buildings or expansion of existing buildings. For 
purposes of this program, ``research science building'' means a 
building or facility whose purpose is for the conduct of scientific 
research, including laboratories, test facilities, measurement 
facilities, research computing facilities, and observatories. In 
addition, ``expansion of existing buildings'' means that space to 
conduct scientific research is being expanded from what is currently 
available for the supported research activities. NIST seeks proposals 
that successfully address the evaluation criteria below.

Unallowable/Ineligible Projects

    The following projects are unallowable/ineligible under this 
program:
    1. Projects to construct or expand a building not intended for 
performing research or that will predominately be equipped with routine 
office equipment and/or lecture/class room furnishings.
    2. Projects to construct facilities that will primarily benefit 
undergraduate research training programs, rather than the creation of 
new graduate level research programs, or expanding existing graduate 
level research programs.
    3. Projects to construct facilities that will primarily benefit the 
education of the general public rather than support research 
activities.
    4. Projects that include tasks for constructing shell space that 
will not be completed into research space within the grant will have 
these tasks removed.

Unallowable/Ineligible Costs

    The following items, regardless of whether they are allowable under 
the Federal cost principles, are unallowable under this program and may 
not be used as cost sharing:
    1. Ancillary Structures, rights-of-way surveys, appraisals, etc.
    2. Costs or charges associated with routine maintenance, or 
operation of the facility.
    3. Equipment used for research or otherwise that is not an integral 
part of the building's structure, e.g., table top equipment, portable 
air conditioners, etc. Equipment that is an integral part of the 
building such as fume hoods, HVAC equipment, built-in autoclave, etc., 
is allowable.
    4. Furniture other than fixed laboratory casework.
    5. Interior decorating.
    6. Landscaping or other improvements exterior to the footprint of 
the building, unless required for its operation.
    7. Purchase of land.
    8. Relocation expenses.
    9. Safety equipment items, e.g., fire extinguishers, first-aid 
kits, etc. Built-in safety items, e.g., eye wash stations or chemical 
showers, however, are fixed items and are allowable.
    10. Storage costs.
    11. Telephone and/or network equipment, e.g., servers, storage, 
racks, etc., however, IT and telephone cabling and wiring installed 
during construction is allowable.
    12. Training, unless related to regulatory compliance for 
construction.
    Funding Availability. Up to $50 million is available for new grants 
for the FY 2010 competition. NIST anticipates funding three to five 
projects with Federal shares in the $10 million--$15 million range with 
a project period of performance of up to five (5) years, although there 
is an expectation that most of the projects will be completed prior to 
five years. The anticipated start date will be one month after the 
award is made. The period of performance depends on the construction 
schedule proposed.
    Eligibility Criteria. U.S. institutions of higher education and 
non-profit organizations are eligible to apply.

Restrictions on Submission of Letters of Intent and Full Proposals and 
on Proposal Funding

    Each applicant organization may submit only two Letters of Intent 
(form NIST-1102), in response to this solicitation, and two 
corresponding full proposals. If more than two Letters of Intent are 
received from the same applicant organization, NIST will acknowledge 
receipt of each and provide notice that if more than two full proposals 
are received from the same applicant organization at the time of full 
proposal submission, all full proposals from that same applicant 
organization will be rejected and returned without review. A full 
proposal may not be submitted unless NIST has received the required 
Letter of Intent by the deadline and the applicant has received an 
acknowledgement letter from NIST. If a full proposal is submitted to 
NIST from an applicant who did not submit the required Letter of Intent 
for their full proposal, the full proposal will be rejected and 
returned to the applicant without review. Although each applicant 
organization may submit two full proposals, only one full proposal 
project from each applicant organization may be funded.
    Institutions of Higher Education Status as Single or Multiple 
Applicants: Large, multi-campus academic systems usually have distinct 
campuses with their own chancellors, student admissions, and separate 
research or research training activities. Such a campus, which exists 
as a separate university, with its own student programs and degrees, 
qualifies as a separate entity for the purpose of submitting a Letter 
of Intent and corresponding full proposal.
    If a university includes multiple colleges of study, whether 
located in the institution's main campus or located some miles from the 
main university campus on a physically distinct campus, they are not 
considered separate entities. Campuses in a multi-campus situation may 
submit

[[Page 9394]]

independent proposals if they are part of a multi-campus system, such 
as a state university system or state community college system, and 
have independent administrative structures typical of universities or 
community colleges. Campuses headed by Department Heads, Deans, Center 
Directors or other administrators at similar levels are not eligible to 
submit an independent proposal.
    If a university established a Research Foundation specifically to 
promote, encourage and provide assistance to the research activities of 
the university, and the Research Foundation is a separate non-profit 
science research organization, is incorporated under State laws and 
regulations, and is led by a separate governing board and committees, 
it still supports the activities of the university and cannot be 
considered an organization with interests distinct from the university. 
It has no students or faculty of its own, separate from the university. 
Accordingly, research proposals submitted by the Research Foundation 
will count toward the institutional proposal limit.
    Use of NIST-1102, Letter of Intent. A ``letter of intent'' may only 
be submitted using the mandatory form NIST-1102, Letter of Intent. If a 
``letter of intent'' is submitted in other than the required form NIST-
1102, Letter of Intent, the applicant will NOT be eligible to submit a 
corresponding full proposal. Additionally, failure to provide all 
required information on the NIST-1102, Letter of Intent, may result in 
the applicant being ineligible to submit a corresponding full proposal.
    Cost Sharing Requirements. This program requires a cost share of at 
least 20 percent of the yearly total project costs.
    Evaluation Criteria. The evaluation criteria that will be used in 
evaluating proposals are as follows:
    1. Scientific and technical merit of the proposed use of the 
facility and the need for Federal funding (50 percent).
    This criterion addresses the intellectual merit and broader impacts 
of the proposed use of the facility; the strategic research directions 
planned with the facility and how well the plan is conceived and 
organized; what the facility will enable in terms of the advancement of 
knowledge and understanding within a specific field(s) or across 
different fields; the qualifications of the proposed key researchers 
(individuals or teams) which will use the facility, as well as the 
management team that will lead them; the potential for targeted impacts 
resulting from the use of the facility that are unlikely to be achieved 
with the current infrastructure, such as what transformative or 
creative concepts may expand the science and technology knowledge base; 
the extent to which the facility will enhance collaborations within and 
outside of the institution; and the need for Federal funding due to a 
lack of alternative funding sources, specifically what other sources 
were pursued.
    2. The quality of the design of the research science building (25 
percent).
    This criterion addresses the quality of the design information 
provided for the building/facility to establish that the design has the 
ability to meet the safety, physical, environmental, experimental/
research (e.g. unique environmental controls--vibration, humidity 
temperature etc.), and operational (e.g. utilities and circulation of 
people) requirements of the science and technology activities the 
building/facility is expected to support. It also addresses whether or 
not preliminary drawings and plans, together with appropriate 
estimates, of in-house or vendor costs, are complete, in progress, or 
planned. Furthermore, it addresses the rationale for and summary 
specifications of the building/facility, including location, size, 
configuration, environmental controls for research space, utility 
needs, gross and/or assignable square footage, assignments of square 
footage to research and non-research related activities (e.g., routine 
administrative office space, conference rooms, classrooms, etc.), and 
the assigned purpose by areas. Finally, this criterion addresses the 
incorporation of green/sustainable design features in the project.
    3. Adequacy of the detailed Project Management Plan (PMP) for 
construction of the research science building/facility (25 percent). 
The program will evaluate the following four aspects of the PMP, which 
do not vary in importance:
a. Project Scope and Requirements
    This aspect of the PMP addresses the description and organization 
of project work packages (project tasks/elements) in a clear and 
complete Work/task Breakdown Structure (WBS) approach that comprises 
the total scope of the building/facility project from inception through 
commissioning of the facility, including descriptions of each work 
package and its associated subtasks, the relationship between the work 
packages and their associated subtasks, consolidated into a unified 
project scope description that will be used by project management key 
personnel throughout the project management life-cycle to identify and 
monitor project progress, as well as link and track work packages and 
subtasks to the budget and schedule plans addressed in c.(2) below. In 
addition, this criterion addresses which work packages are proposed to 
be within, before, or after the project period. The project period 
covers only the Federal and the allowable auditable cost sharing 
portion of the project.
b. Adequacy of the Proposed Project Time Schedule and Linkage to the 
Budget, Including the Clarity of the Budget and the Budget Narrative
    This aspect of the PMP addresses the time schedule for implementing 
the work packages and associated subtasks described within the WBS 
addressed in c.(1) above, and how the budget costs associated with the 
work packages correctly sum up to each of the cost categories of the 
SF-424C by project year.
c. Capability To Manage the Project
    This aspect of the PMP addresses the approach planned for project 
management monitoring and risk control during the life of the award, 
from kick-off through close-out, which may include tools, techniques 
and processes (manual and automated systems). It also addresses an 
analysis of potential project risks (e.g. timing, cost and/or scope 
changes), where in the schedule risk(s) may be expected, and how the 
risk(s) may be mitigated through specific control mechanisms, and the 
planning/control decision making process to implement the control 
mechanisms. Finally, it addresses the management plan for direction and 
implementation of the project, including capability descriptions of the 
performing organizations and experience summaries for the manager with 
fiduciary project responsibility, the project manager, and other key 
project personnel as appropriate.
d. Soundness of the Financial Commitments To Implement the PMP
    This aspect of the PMP addresses the current and any pending 
commitments required for the building/facility to be constructed, 
commissioned and become fully operational, including any risk(s) 
associated with finalizing funding commitments and the organizational 
name/contact that has the fiduciary authority over the funding 
commitments.

Selection Process

    1. Letter of Intent--Form NIST-1102. An initial administrative 
review of timely received letters of intent will be

[[Page 9395]]

conducted to determine compliance with requirements and completeness. 
NIST will send an acknowledgement letter to all applicants who timely 
submit a Letter of Intent with results of the review. It is expected 
that the Letter of Intent will be reviewed for eligibility of the 
proposed applicant and proposed project, and whether or not the 
scientific research to be performed in the building/facility will 
complement one or more programs of DoC's three science organizations' 
Program Priorities. (See section V.3. Program Priorities of the FFO 
announcement.)
    2. Full Proposal. An initial administrative review of timely 
received full proposals will be conducted to determine compliance with 
requirements and completeness. Proposals that are nonresponsive and/or 
incomplete will be eliminated. Each of the responsive and complete 
proposals will receive a minimum of three independent reviews, which 
will include written evaluations and scores, based on the evaluation 
criteria. Reviews addressing evaluation criteria 2 and 3 above may be 
performed by non-Federal Engineers or Architects. No consensus advice 
will be given by the reviewers. Failure of an applicant to cooperate 
with NIST in identifying feasible measures to reduce or avoid 
identified adverse environmental impacts of its proposed project may 
result in the applicant not receiving an award. (See National 
Environmental Policy Act section below for more information.)
    The individual proposal evaluations and scores will be considered 
by an Evaluation Board(s), a committee comprised of Federal employees. 
This Board(s) will present proposals in numerical rank order and 
provide funding recommendations, based on the evaluation criteria, to a 
Selecting Official for further consideration. In making final 
selections, the Selecting Official, who is the Chief Facilities 
Management Officer at NIST, will select funding recipients based upon 
the Evaluation Board's rank order of the proposals and the selection 
factors. The selection of proposals by the Selecting Official is final 
and cannot be appealed.
    NIST reserves the right to negotiate the cost and scope of the 
proposed work with the applicants that have been selected to receive 
awards. This may include requesting that the applicant delete from the 
scope of work a particular task that is deemed by NIST to be 
inappropriate for support (or of a lower priority compared with 
competing uses of funds) against the evaluation criteria or selection 
factors. NIST also reserves the right to reject a proposal where 
information is uncovered that raises a reasonable doubt as to the 
responsibility of the applicant. The final approval of selected 
proposals and award of grants will be made by the NIST Grants Officer. 
The award decision of the NIST Grants Officer is final and cannot be 
appealed.
    Applicants may not submit replacement and/or revised pages and/or 
documents for any portion of a proposal once that portion has been 
submitted unless specifically requested by NIST.
    One copy of each incomplete, nonresponsive, or non-selected 
proposal will be retained for three (3) years for record keeping 
purposes and the other two (2) copies will be destroyed. After three 
(3) years the remaining copy will be destroyed.

Selection Factors

    The Selecting Official shall recommend proposals for award based 
upon the Evaluation Board's rank order of the proposals, and may select 
a proposal out of rank based on one or more of the following selecting 
factors:
    1. Assuring a balance/distribution of projects across the program 
priorities (see FFO section V.3. Program Priorities).
    2. Availability of Federal funds.
    3. Whether this project duplicates other projects funded by DoC or 
other Federal agencies.
    4. Applicant's prior Federal award performance.
    5. Assuring a balance/distribution of funds across regional/
geographic areas.
    6. Whether the applicant has received previous funding under the 
NIST Construction Grant Program.
    As noted above, no more than one full proposal per applicant 
organization will be funded.

Program Priorities

    All applicable fields of science that complement one or more 
programs of DoC's three science organizations: NIST, the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the National 
Telecommunication and Information Administration (NTIA). Specifically, 
these include science related to measurements, oceans and atmosphere, 
and telecommunications. More information about those programs can be 
found on the agencies' Web sites (https://www.nist.gov, https://www.noaa.gov, and https://www.ntia.doc.gov).
    Proposals are only required to link to the program priorities of 
one of the three DoC science organizations. Proposals that address 
program priorities of more than one organization are not considered to 
be more competitive based on that fact alone.
    Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal 
Programs). Proposals under this program are not subject to Executive 
Order 12372.
    Administrative Procedure Act and Regulatory Flexibility Act. Prior 
notice and comment are not required under 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other 
law, for rules relating to public property, loans, grants, benefits or 
contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)). Because prior notice and an opportunity 
for public comment are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or any 
other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (5 U.S.C. et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory 
flexibility analysis is not required and has not been prepared.
    E.O. 13132 (Federalism). This notice does not contain policies with 
Federalism implications as defined in Executive Order 13132.
    E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review). This notice is 
determined to be not significant under Executive Order 12866.
    Paperwork Reduction Act. Notwithstanding any other provision of the 
law, no person is required to, nor shall any person be subject to a 
penalty for failure to, comply with a collection of information subject 
to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), unless that 
collection of information displays a currently valid Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This notice contains 
collection-of-information requirements subject to the PRA. The use of 
Form NIST-1101, NIST Construction Grant Program Budget Narrative, NIST-
1101A, NIST Construction Grant Program Budget Narrative, and NIST-1102, 
Letter of Intent Construction Grant Program, have been approved under 
OMB Control No. 0693-0055; CD-593, U.S. Department of Commerce National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Questionnaire & Checklist 
has been approved under OMB Control No. 0690-0028; and SF-424, 
Application for Federal Assistance, SF-424C, Budget Information--
Construction Programs, SF-424D, Assurances--Construction Programs, and 
SF-LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, have been approved by OMB 
under the respective control numbers 4040-0004, 4040-0008, 4040-0009, 
and 0348-0046.
    Title, Encumbrances, and Security Interest. Prior to disbursement 
of any funds under the award, the recipient will be required to furnish 
evidence, satisfactory in form and substance to NIST that title to real 
property is vested

[[Page 9396]]

in the Recipient, and that it has obtained any rights-of-way, 
easements, State and local government permits, long-term leases, or 
other property interests. The Recipient will also be required to 
disclose all encumbrances to NIST, which shall not interfere with the 
construction, intended use, operation, or maintenance of the project 
during its estimated useful life.
    In addition, grant recipients will be required to execute a 
security interest or other statement of NIST's interest in the property 
(building), acceptable to NIST, which must be perfected and placed on 
record in accordance with local law. This security interest will 
provide that, for the estimated useful life of the building (20 years), 
the recipient will not sell, transfer, convey, or mortgage any interest 
in the real property improved in whole or in part with Federal funds 
made available under the award, nor shall the recipient use the 
property for purposes other than the purposes for which the award was 
made, without the prior written approval of the Grants Officer. Such 
approval may be withheld until such time as the recipient first pays to 
NIST the Federal share of the property as provided in 15 CFR Part 14. 
No funds under the award shall be released until the recipient has 
complied with this provision, unless other arrangements satisfactory to 
NIST are made.
    DoC Pre-Award Notification Requirements. The Department of Commerce 
Pre-Award Notification Requirements for Grants and Cooperative 
Agreements, which are contained in the Federal Register Notice of 
February 11, 2008 (73 FR 7696-01), are applicable to this solicitation.

Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number and Dun and Bradstreet Data 
Universal Numbering System

    On the form SF-424 items 8.b. and 8.c., the applicant's 9-digit 
Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN) and 9-digit Dun and 
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number must be 
consistent with the information on the Central Contractor Registration 
(CCR) (https://www.ccr.gov) and Automated Standard Application for 
Payment System (ASAP). For complex organizations with multiple EIN/TIN 
and DUNS numbers, the EIN/TIN and DUNS number MUST be the numbers for 
the applying organization. Organizations that provide incorrect/
inconsistent EIN/TIN and DUNS numbers may experience significant delays 
in receiving funds if their proposal is selected for funding. Please 
confirm that the EIN/TIN and DUNS number are consistent with the 
information on the CCR and ASAP.
    National Environmental Policy Act. The Department must analyze the 
potential environmental impacts, as required by the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). General information on compliance with 
NEPA can be found at the following Web sites: https://www.nepa.noaa.gov, 
and the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) NEPAnet, https://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/nepanet.htm.
    Consequently, as part of an applicant's proposal, and under their 
description of their program activities, applicants are required to 
provide detailed information on the activities to be conducted, safety 
concerns, locations, site characteristics, surrounding environment, 
species and habitat that might be affected, construction activities, 
and any environmental concerns that may exist (e.g., the use and 
disposal of hazardous or toxic chemicals, impacts to endangered and 
threatened species, or any social, economic or cultural impacts to the 
surrounding environment) and in accordance with the required CD-593, 
U.S. Department of Commerce National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
Environmental Questionnaire & Checklist.
    It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary 
Federal, state, and local government permits and approvals where 
necessary for the proposed work to be conducted. Applicants are 
expected to design their projects so that they minimize the potential 
for adverse impacts to the environment. Applicants will also be 
required to cooperate with the Department in identifying feasible 
measures to reduce or avoid any identified adverse environmental 
impacts of their proposed project. The failure to do so may be grounds 
for not making an award to the applicant or enforcement action if an 
award is eventually made.
    Documentation of requests/completion of required environmental 
authorizations and permits, including the Endangered Species Act, if 
applicable, should be included in the proposal. Applications will be 
reviewed to ensure that they contain sufficient information to allow 
Department staff to conduct a NEPA analysis so that appropriate NEPA 
documentation, required as part of the proposal, can be submitted to 
the NIST Grants and Agreements Management Division along with the 
recommendation for funding for selected applications.
    Applicants proposing activities that cannot be covered by a Program 
Environmental Assessment (PEA) and Finding of No Significant Impact 
(FONSI) or whose activities are not covered under another agency's NEPA 
compliance procedures that can be analyzed and adopted for use by the 
Department, will be informed after the technical review stage to 
determine if NEPA compliance and other requirements can otherwise be 
expeditiously met so that a project can proceed in a timely manner. If 
an award is made, no funds shall be expended for construction 
activities under the award until NIST determines compliance with NEPA.
    If additional information is required during the period of the 
award, funds can be withheld by the Grants Officer under a special 
award condition requiring the recipient to submit additional 
environmental law compliance information sufficient to enable the 
Department to assess any impacts that a project may have on the 
environment.
    Reporting. Award Recipients shall provide access to information 
that is required to assess the project's progress throughout the 
project life cycle. The following reports are required:
    1. Technical Performance Reports. Award Recipients shall submit a 
technical performance report in triplicate (an original and two copies) 
on a calendar quarter basis for the periods ending March 31, June 30, 
September 30, and December 31, or any portion thereof. Reports are due 
no later than 30 days following the end of each reporting period. A 
final technical performance report shall be submitted within 90 days 
after the expiration date of the award. Two copies of the technical 
performance reports shall be submitted to the Project Manager and the 
original report to the NIST Grants Officer. Technical performance 
reports shall contain information as prescribed in 15 CFR 14.51.
    2. Financial Reports. For recipients under this program, Article 
A.01 of the DoC Financial Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions 
dated March 2008 is revised as follows:
    Award Recipients shall submit a Federal Financial Report (SF-425) 
in triplicate (an original and two copies) on a calendar quarter basis 
for the periods ending March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 
31, or any portion thereof. Reports are due no later than 30 days 
following the end of each reporting period. A final SF-425 shall be 
submitted within 90 days after the expiration date of the award. All 
SF-425s shall be submitted to the NIST Grants Officer.
    Reporting requirements are described in the Department of Commerce

[[Page 9397]]

Financial Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions dated March, 2008, 
found on the Internet at: https://oamweb.osec.doc.gov/docs/GRANTS/DOC%20STCsMAR08Rev.pdf.
    The references to Financial Reporting Form SF-269 in the DoC 
Standard Terms & Conditions, A.01 and B.01, are hereby replaced with 
the SF-425, ``Federal Financial Report,'' as required by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) (73 FR 61175, October 15, 2008). As 
authorized under 15 CFR 14.52 and 24.41, the OMB approved SF-425 shall 
be used in the place of the SF-269 and SF-272 under the uniform 
administrative requirements and elsewhere under awards in this program 
where such forms are referenced.

    Dated: February 24, 2010.
Marc G. Stanley,
Acting Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-4286 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P