AK Steel Corporation, Mansfield Works Division, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Time Customized Staffing Solutions, Mansfield, OH; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 9442-9443 [2010-4245]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
9442
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
and used automobiles to individual
owners at an automotive dealership.
The workers of the subject firm did not
perform additional, value-added
production processes or services
directly to any of the certified primary
firms during the investigation period.
Thus, the subject firm workers are not
eligible for TAA as downstream
producers under secondary impact.
Further, the subject firm is not an
upstream supplier because it did not
provide services to a TAA-certified firm
during the investigation period.
The petitioner also alleged that
increased imports of foreign-produced
automobiles negatively impacted
business of the subject firm and,
therefore, workers who perform sales
and service of domestic automobiles
should be eligible for TAA.
When assessing a worker group’s
eligibility to apply for TAA, the
Department exclusively considers
imports of articles like or directly
competitive with those manufactured by
the subject firm or services like or
directly competitive with those
supplied by the workers of the subject
firm during the relevant period. It was
revealed during the initial investigation
that the subject firm neither imported
services like or directly competitive
with the services supplied by worker
group nor shifted to or acquired from
foreign country services like or directly
competitive with the services supplied
by worker group.
The petitioners did not supply facts
not previously considered and did not
provide any documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
February, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–4246 Filed 3–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,231]
Lonza, Inc., Riverside Plant, Lonza
Exclusive Synthesis Section, Custom
Manufacturing Division, Including OnSite Leased Workers From Lab
Support, Aerotek, Job Exchange, and
Synerfac, Conshohocken, PA; Notice
of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
On December 23, 2009, the
Department issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration applicable to
workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The notice of affirmative
determination was published in the
Federal Register on January 6, 2010 (75
FR 878).
The initial investigation, initiated on
September 8, 2009, resulted in a
negative determination, issued on
November 5, 2009, that was based on
the finding that imports did not
contribute importantly to worker
separations at the subject firm and no
shift in production to a foreign country
occurred. The notice of negative
determination was published in the
Federal Register on January 25, 2010
(75 FR 3935).
To support the request for
reconsideration, the petitioner supplied
additional information to supplement
that which was gathered during the
initial investigation.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department carefully
reviewed new information provided by
the petitioner and contacted the
company official for additional
information and clarification of
previously-submitted information.
The reconsideration investigation
revealed that the subject firm is shifting
production of articles like or directly
competitive with cGMP intermediates
and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
from the subject facility to a foreign
country and that this shift on
production contributed importantly to
worker separations during the relevant
period.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
determine that workers of Lonza, Inc.,
Riverside Plant, Lonza Exclusive
Synthesis Section, Custom
Manufacturing Division, including onsite leased workers of Lab Support,
Aerotek, Job Exchange, and Synerfac,
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, who are
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
engaged in employment related to the
production of cGMP intermediates and
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, meet
the worker group certification criteria
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with
Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273,
I make the following certification:
All workers of Lonza, Inc., Riverside Plant,
Lonza Exclusive Synthesis Section, Custom
Manufacturing Division, including on-site
leased workers of Lab Support, Aerotek, Job
Exchange, and Synerfac, Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania, who are engaged in
employment related to the production of
cGMP intermediates and Active
Pharmaceutical Ingredients, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after September 2, 2008,
through two years from the date of this
certification, and all workers in the group
threatened with total or partial separation
from employment on date of certification
through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
February, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–4249 Filed 3–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
TA–W–71,375
AK Steel Corporation, Mansfield Works
Division, Including On-Site Leased
Workers From Time Customized
Staffing Solutions, Mansfield, OH;
Notice of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
On January 8, 2010, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The notice of affirmative determination
was published in the Federal Register
on February 1, 2010 (75 FR 5145).
The initial investigation, initiated on
June 24, 2009, resulted in a negative
determination, issued on November 2,
2009, that was based on the finding that
imports did not contribute importantly
to worker separations at the subject firm
and no shift in production to a foreign
country occurred. The notice of negative
determination was published in the
Federal Register on January 25, 2010
(75 FR 3935).
To support the request for
reconsideration, the petitioner supplied
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
additional information regarding the
customers of the subject firm to
supplement that which was gathered
during the initial investigation.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department requested
an additional list of customers from the
subject firm and conducted a customer
survey to determine whether imports of
steel coils negatively impacted
employment at AK Steel Corporation,
Mansfield Works Division, Mansfield,
Ohio.
The survey of the subject firm’s major
declining customers revealed that the
customers increased their imports of
steel coils while decreasing purchases
from the subject firm from 2007 to 2008.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
determine that workers of AK Steel
Corporation, Mansfield Works Division,
including on-site leased workers from
Time Customized Staffing Solutions,
Mansfield, Ohio, who are engaged in
employment related to the production of
steel coils, meet the worker group
certification criteria under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In
accordance with Section 223 of the Act,
19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the following
certification:
All workers of AK Steel Corporation,
Mansfield Works Division, including on-site
leased workers from Time Customized
Staffing Solutions, Mansfield, Ohio, who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after June 23, 2008,
through two years from the date of this
certification, and all workers in the group
threatened with total or partial separation
from employment on date of certification
through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of
February, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–4245 Filed 3–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (10–024)]
Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive
License
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of intent to grant
exclusive license.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
SUMMARY: This notice is issued in
accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) and
37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby
gives notice of its intent to grant an
exclusive, license in the United States to
practice the invention described and
claimed in US Patent Application No.
10/885,537, and NASA Case No. ARC–
15204–1 entitled ‘‘Rapid Polymer
Sequencer’’ to Abraxis BioScience, LLC,
having its principal place of business in
11755 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 2000, Los
Angeles, CA 90025. The patent rights in
this invention have been assigned to the
United States of America as represented
by the Administrator of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.
The prospective exclusive license will
comply with the terms and conditions
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
DATES: The prospective exclusive
license may be granted unless, within
fifteen (15) days from the date of this
published notice, NASA receives
written objections including evidence
and argument that establish that the
grant of the license would not be
consistent with the requirements of 35
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
Competing applications completed and
received by NASA within fifteen (15)
days of the date of this published notice
will also be treated as objections to the
grant of the contemplated exclusive
license.
Objections submitted in response to
this notice will not be made available to
the public for inspection and, to the
extent permitted by law, will not be
released under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
Objections relating to the
prospective license may be submitted to
Patent Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel,
NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop
202A–4, Moffett Field, CA 94035–1000.
(650) 604–5104; Fax (650) 604–2767.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert M. Padilla, Chief Patent Counsel,
Office of Chief Counsel, NASA Ames
Research Center, Mail Stop 202A–4,
Moffett Field, CA 94035–1000. (650)
604–5104; Fax (650) 604–2767.
Information about other NASA
inventions available for licensing can be
found online at https://
technology.nasa.gov/.
Dated: February 24, 2010.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010–4193 Filed 3–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9443
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0394]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
SUMMARY: The NRC has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The NRC published a Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period on this information collection on
October 14, 2009.
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: New.
2. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR part 5,
‘‘Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex
in Education Programs or Activities
Receiving Federal Financial Assistance’’.
3. Current OMB approval number:
3150–XXXX.
4. The form number if applicable:
N/A.
5. How often the collection is
required: 10 CFR 5 follows provisions
covered in 10 CFR 4, Section 4.331
Compliance Reviews, which indicates
NRC may conduct compliance reviews
and Pre-Award reviews of recipients or
use other similar procedures that will
permit it to investigate and correct
violations of the act and these
regulations. NRC may conduct these
reviews even in absence of a complaint
against a recipient. The reviews may be
as comprehensive as necessary to
determine whether a violation of these
regulations has occurred.
6. Who will be required or asked to
report: Recipients of Federal Financial
Assistance provided by the NRC
(including Educational Institutions,
Other Nonprofit Organizations receiving
Federal Assistance, and Agreement
States).
7. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: 800 (600 responses
plus 200 recordkeepers).
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 200.
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9442-9443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4245]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-71,375
AK Steel Corporation, Mansfield Works Division, Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Time Customized Staffing Solutions, Mansfield, OH;
Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration
On January 8, 2010, the Department issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration applicable to
workers and former workers of the subject firm. The notice of
affirmative determination was published in the Federal Register on
February 1, 2010 (75 FR 5145).
The initial investigation, initiated on June 24, 2009, resulted in
a negative determination, issued on November 2, 2009, that was based on
the finding that imports did not contribute importantly to worker
separations at the subject firm and no shift in production to a foreign
country occurred. The notice of negative determination was published in
the Federal Register on January 25, 2010 (75 FR 3935).
To support the request for reconsideration, the petitioner supplied
[[Page 9443]]
additional information regarding the customers of the subject firm to
supplement that which was gathered during the initial investigation.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department requested
an additional list of customers from the subject firm and conducted a
customer survey to determine whether imports of steel coils negatively
impacted employment at AK Steel Corporation, Mansfield Works Division,
Mansfield, Ohio.
The survey of the subject firm's major declining customers revealed
that the customers increased their imports of steel coils while
decreasing purchases from the subject firm from 2007 to 2008.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional facts obtained on
reconsideration, I determine that workers of AK Steel Corporation,
Mansfield Works Division, including on-site leased workers from Time
Customized Staffing Solutions, Mansfield, Ohio, who are engaged in
employment related to the production of steel coils, meet the worker
group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I
make the following certification:
All workers of AK Steel Corporation, Mansfield Works Division,
including on-site leased workers from Time Customized Staffing
Solutions, Mansfield, Ohio, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after June 23, 2008, through two
years from the date of this certification, and all workers in the
group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on
date of certification through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of February, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-4245 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
