Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 8925-8926 [2010-4072]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2010 / Notices
7106, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no
later than ten (10) calendar days
following publication of this notice.
Please follow the procedures set forth
in Section 315.9 of EDA’s final rule (71
FR 56704) for procedures for requesting
a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance official program
number and title of the program under
which these petitions are submitted is
11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance.
Dated: February 22, 2010.
Bryan Borlik,
Program Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–3962 Filed 2–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–059]
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from
Italy: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 26, 2010.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting a
changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty finding on pressure
sensitive plastic tape from Italy
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3). We
preliminarily determine that Evotape
S.p.A was the successor–in-interest to
Tyco Adhesives Italia S.p.A. (Tyco), and
that Evotape Packaging S.r.l. (Evotape
Packaging) and Evotape Masking S.r.l.
(Evotape Masking) are both successors–
in-interest to Evotape S.p.A for purposes
of determining antidumping liability.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton Stefanova or Rebecca
Trainor, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280
and (202) 482–4007, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 27, 2009, Evotape Packaging
requested that the Department conduct
an expedited changed circumstances
review to determine that it is the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
successor–in-interest to Tyco for
purposes of determining antidumping
liability.1 Evotape Packaging provided
additional information at the
Department’s request on August 28,
2009. On September 10, 2009, the
Department initiated a changed
circumstances review but did not
expedite the review, as requested by
Evotape Packaging, because questions
remained as to the factual claims
forming the basis of the change
circumstances review request. See
Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from
Italy: Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, 74 FR 47555
(September 16, 2009). On October 26,
2009, the Department placed on the
record a memorandum regarding
corrections to the scope language
contained in the initiation notice. (See
October 26, 2009, Memorandum to The
File regarding ‘‘Corrections to Scope
Language’’). On November 3, 2009, the
Department requested additional
information from Evotape Packaging,
and on November 24, 2009, Evotape
Packaging submitted its response to the
Department’s information request.
Scope of the Finding
The products covered by the finding
are shipments of pressure sensitive
plastic tape measuring over one and
three–eighths inches in width and not
exceeding four mils in thickness,
currently classifiable under subheadings
3919.10.20 and 3919.90.50 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and for customs purposes.
The written description remains
dispositive.
Successor–in-Interest Determination
In making a successor–in-interest
determination, the Department typically
examines several factors including, but
not limited to: (1) management; (2)
production facilities; (3) supplier
relationships; and (4) customer base.
See, e.g., Notice of Final Results of
Changed Circumstances Review:
Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan, 69
FR 67890 (November 22, 2004)
(Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan)
citing; Brass Sheet and Strip from
Canada; Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR
20460 (May 13, 1992) (Canadian Brass);
and, Certain Circular Welded Carbon
Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan:
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed
1 The cash deposit rate currently applicable to
Tyco is zero percent. The all-others rate is 10
percent.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8925
Circumstances Review, 70 FR 17063
(April 4, 2005). While no single factor
or combination of these factors will
necessarily be dispositive, the
Department will generally consider the
new company to be the successor to the
previous company if its resulting
operation is not materially dissimilar to
that of its predecessor. See, e.g.,
Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan;
Industrial Phosphoric Acid from Israel:
Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Review, 59 FR 6944 (February 14, 1994);
Canadian Brass; Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review
and Notice of Intent to Revoke in Part
74 FR 39042 (August 5, 2009);
(unchanged in final results Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From
Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review
and Notice of Revocation in Part 74 FR
52452 (October 13, 2009)). Thus, if the
evidence demonstrates that, with
respect to the production and sale of the
subject merchandise, the new company
operates as the same business entity as
the former company, the Department
will generally accord the new company
the same antidumping duty treatment as
its predecessor.
Preliminary Results
In its request for a changed
circumstances review, Evotape
Packaging explained that, in May 2005,
its parent company, Evotape S.p.A,
acquired Tyco’s business and assets,
which included two production units
(packaging and masking tape) and
related sales offices. Subsequently, in
December 2007, Evotape S.p.A went
through a restructuring that created two
wholly–owned subsidiaries (i.e.,
Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking
S.r.l. (Evotape Masking)) using the
assets and business of the two
production units. In response to the
Department’s questions concerning the
corporate restructuring, Evotape
Packaging stated that Evotape Masking
produces two in–scope products, but
does not ship or sell these products to
the United States, and has no future
plans to do so (see August 28, 2009, and
November 24, 2009, responses).2
Based on the facts on the record
surrounding the acquisition and
2 Notwithstanding this fact and Evotape
Packaging’s original changed circumstances review
request to determine that only it is the successorin-interest to Tyco, Evotape Packaging
acknowledged in its November 24, 2009, response
that it may be appropriate to consider both Evotape
Packaging and Evotape Masking as successors-ininterest to Tyco because they are both whollyowned subsidiaries of Evotape S.p.A.
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
8926
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2010 / Notices
subsequent corporate restructuring
described above, and in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(i), we have
made two preliminary successor–ininterest determinations.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
1. Evotape S.p.A Was the Successor–InInterest to Tyco
Our first preliminary successor–ininterest determination is that Evotape
S.p.A was the successor–in-interest to
Tyco. Evotape Packaging submitted
documentation to demonstrate that
Evotape S.p.A acquired Tyco in May
2005 (see Evotape Packaging’s July 27,
2009, submission at Exhibit 1). Evotape
Packaging also provided information
pertaining to changes in management,
production, suppliers, and customers
that occurred after Evotape S.p.A.
acquired Tyco. The information
indicated that, except for three changes
in management and some minor
changes in customers, the company’s
business operations had not been
substantially affected by the change in
ownership (see November 24, 2009,
response). Thus, we preliminary find
that in May 2005, Evotape S.p.A.
became the successor–in-interest to
Tyco, because the changes in
management and customers that took
place after Tyco’s acquisition by
Evotape S.p.A. did not alter the
production or business operations of the
company.
2. Evotape Packaging and Evotape
Masking are Successors–In-Interest to
Evotape S.p.A
For our second preliminary
successor–in-interest determination, we
find that both Evotape Packaging and
Evotape Masking are successors–ininterest to Evotape S.p.A. Evotape
Packaging submitted copies of the
documents that established Evotape
Packaging and Evotape Masking as
separate wholly–owned subsidiaries of
Evotape S.p.A in December 2007 (see
November 24, 2009, response at Exhibit
1). Evotape Packaging also provided
information indicating that, while some
minor changes in business operations
occurred after the companies’ transition
from production units to formal
companies, they continued to operate
essentially as they did as production
units under Evotape S.p.A. Specifically,
the restructuring resulted in the
reallocation of duties among managers,
and a slight reduction in the number of
employees at both companies. The
companies also experienced slight
changes to their supplier and customer
lists, but maintained their top supplier
and customer relationships. Evotape
Packaging added two products to its
product mix, but the two companies
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
continued to use the same separate
production facilities that they used as
production units under Evotape S.p.A.
(see November 24, 2009, response).
Moreover, the ownership of the two
entities remains essentially the same as
both companies are wholly–owned
subsidiaries of Evotape S.p.A. Because
both companies continue to operate
essentially as they did as production
units of Evotape S.p.A., after the
December 2007, restructuring,
irrespective of the minor changes
described above, we preliminary find
that in December 2007, both Evotape
Packaging and Evotape Masking became
the successors–in-interest to Evotape
S.p.A. for purposes of determining
antidumping liability.
In conclusion, as a result of both of
these determinations, we preliminary
find that Evotape Packaging and
Evotape Masking should receive Tyco’s
antidumping duty cash deposit rate
with respect to the subject merchandise
(i.e., 0.00 percent). If the above
preliminary results are affirmed in the
Department’s final results, the cash
deposit rate resulting from this changed
circumstances review will apply to all
entries of the subject merchandise from
Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
changed circumstances review. See
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin
from Italy Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review,
68 FR 25327 (May 12, 2003).
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
Written comments may be submitted no
later than 14 days after the date of
publication of these preliminary results.
Rebuttals to written comments, limited
to issues raised in such comments, may
be filed no later than 21 days after the
date of publication of this notice. All
written comments shall be submitted in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. Any
interested party may request a hearing
within 14 days of publication of this
notice. Any hearing, if requested, will
be held no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice, or the
first workday thereafter. Persons
interested in attending the hearing, if
one is requested, should contact the
Department for the date and time of
hearing. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.216(e), the Department will issue
the final results of this antidumping
duty changed circumstances review no
later than 270 days after the date on
which this review was initiated, or
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
within 45 days if all parties agree to our
preliminary results.
During the course of this antidumping
duty changed circumstances review,
cash deposit requirements for the
subject merchandise produced and
exported by Evotape Packaging and
Evotape Masking will continue to be the
all–others rate established in the
investigation. See Pressure Sensitive
Plastic Tape From Italy; Determination
of Injury or Likelihood Thereof, 42 FR
44853 (September 7, 1977). The cash
deposit rate requirement for Evotape
Packaging and Evotape Masking will be
altered, if warranted, pursuant only to
the final results of this review.
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.216 and 351.221(c)(3).
Dated: February 22, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–4072 Filed 2–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Additions
AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Additions to the Procurement
List.
SUMMARY: This action adds to the
Procurement List products and a service
to be furnished by nonprofit agencies
employing persons who are blind or
have other severe disabilities.
DATES: Effective Date: March 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800,
1421 Jefferson Davis Highway,
Arlington, Virginia, 22202–3259.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703)
603–7740, Fax: (703) 603–0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Additions
On 12/28/2009 (74 FR 68587), the
Committee for Purchase From People
Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled
published a notice of proposed
additions to the Procurement List.
After consideration of the material
presented to it concerning capability of
qualified nonprofit agencies to provide
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8925-8926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4072]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-059]
Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 26, 2010.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting a
changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty finding on
pressure sensitive plastic tape from Italy pursuant to section 751(b)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.216 and
351.221(c)(3). We preliminarily determine that Evotape S.p.A was the
successor-in-interest to Tyco Adhesives Italia S.p.A. (Tyco), and that
Evotape Packaging S.r.l. (Evotape Packaging) and Evotape Masking S.r.l.
(Evotape Masking) are both successors-in-interest to Evotape S.p.A for
purposes of determining antidumping liability. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these preliminary results.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova or Rebecca
Trainor, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-1280 and (202) 482-4007, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 27, 2009, Evotape Packaging requested that the Department
conduct an expedited changed circumstances review to determine that it
is the successor-in-interest to Tyco for purposes of determining
antidumping liability.\1\ Evotape Packaging provided additional
information at the Department's request on August 28, 2009. On
September 10, 2009, the Department initiated a changed circumstances
review but did not expedite the review, as requested by Evotape
Packaging, because questions remained as to the factual claims forming
the basis of the change circumstances review request. See Pressure
Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Notice of Initiation of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 74 FR 47555 (September 16, 2009). On
October 26, 2009, the Department placed on the record a memorandum
regarding corrections to the scope language contained in the initiation
notice. (See October 26, 2009, Memorandum to The File regarding
``Corrections to Scope Language''). On November 3, 2009, the Department
requested additional information from Evotape Packaging, and on
November 24, 2009, Evotape Packaging submitted its response to the
Department's information request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The cash deposit rate currently applicable to Tyco is zero
percent. The all-others rate is 10 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Finding
The products covered by the finding are shipments of pressure
sensitive plastic tape measuring over one and three-eighths inches in
width and not exceeding four mils in thickness, currently classifiable
under subheadings 3919.10.20 and 3919.90.50 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and for customs purposes. The written
description remains dispositive.
Successor-in-Interest Determination
In making a successor-in-interest determination, the Department
typically examines several factors including, but not limited to: (1)
management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and
(4) customer base. See, e.g., Notice of Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review: Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan, 69 FR 67890
(November 22, 2004) (Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan) citing; Brass
Sheet and Strip from Canada; Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992) (Canadian Brass);
and, Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan:
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 70 FR
17063 (April 4, 2005). While no single factor or combination of these
factors will necessarily be dispositive, the Department will generally
consider the new company to be the successor to the previous company if
its resulting operation is not materially dissimilar to that of its
predecessor. See, e.g., Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan; Industrial
Phosphoric Acid from Israel: Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Review, 59 FR 6944 (February 14, 1994); Canadian Brass; Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review and Notice of Intent to Revoke in Part 74
FR 39042 (August 5, 2009); (unchanged in final results Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review and Notice of Revocation in Part 74 FR
52452 (October 13, 2009)). Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that,
with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the
new company operates as the same business entity as the former company,
the Department will generally accord the new company the same
antidumping duty treatment as its predecessor.
Preliminary Results
In its request for a changed circumstances review, Evotape
Packaging explained that, in May 2005, its parent company, Evotape
S.p.A, acquired Tyco's business and assets, which included two
production units (packaging and masking tape) and related sales
offices. Subsequently, in December 2007, Evotape S.p.A went through a
restructuring that created two wholly-owned subsidiaries (i.e., Evotape
Packaging and Evotape Masking S.r.l. (Evotape Masking)) using the
assets and business of the two production units. In response to the
Department's questions concerning the corporate restructuring, Evotape
Packaging stated that Evotape Masking produces two in-scope products,
but does not ship or sell these products to the United States, and has
no future plans to do so (see August 28, 2009, and November 24, 2009,
responses).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Notwithstanding this fact and Evotape Packaging's original
changed circumstances review request to determine that only it is
the successor-in-interest to Tyco, Evotape Packaging acknowledged in
its November 24, 2009, response that it may be appropriate to
consider both Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking as successors-
in-interest to Tyco because they are both wholly-owned subsidiaries
of Evotape S.p.A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the facts on the record surrounding the acquisition and
[[Page 8926]]
subsequent corporate restructuring described above, and in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(i), we have made two preliminary successor-
in-interest determinations.
1. Evotape S.p.A Was the Successor-In-Interest to Tyco
Our first preliminary successor-in-interest determination is that
Evotape S.p.A was the successor-in-interest to Tyco. Evotape Packaging
submitted documentation to demonstrate that Evotape S.p.A acquired Tyco
in May 2005 (see Evotape Packaging's July 27, 2009, submission at
Exhibit 1). Evotape Packaging also provided information pertaining to
changes in management, production, suppliers, and customers that
occurred after Evotape S.p.A. acquired Tyco. The information indicated
that, except for three changes in management and some minor changes in
customers, the company's business operations had not been substantially
affected by the change in ownership (see November 24, 2009, response).
Thus, we preliminary find that in May 2005, Evotape S.p.A. became the
successor-in-interest to Tyco, because the changes in management and
customers that took place after Tyco's acquisition by Evotape S.p.A.
did not alter the production or business operations of the company.
2. Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking are Successors-In-Interest to
Evotape S.p.A
For our second preliminary successor-in-interest determination, we
find that both Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking are successors-in-
interest to Evotape S.p.A. Evotape Packaging submitted copies of the
documents that established Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking as
separate wholly-owned subsidiaries of Evotape S.p.A in December 2007
(see November 24, 2009, response at Exhibit 1). Evotape Packaging also
provided information indicating that, while some minor changes in
business operations occurred after the companies' transition from
production units to formal companies, they continued to operate
essentially as they did as production units under Evotape S.p.A.
Specifically, the restructuring resulted in the reallocation of duties
among managers, and a slight reduction in the number of employees at
both companies. The companies also experienced slight changes to their
supplier and customer lists, but maintained their top supplier and
customer relationships. Evotape Packaging added two products to its
product mix, but the two companies continued to use the same separate
production facilities that they used as production units under Evotape
S.p.A. (see November 24, 2009, response). Moreover, the ownership of
the two entities remains essentially the same as both companies are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Evotape S.p.A. Because both companies
continue to operate essentially as they did as production units of
Evotape S.p.A., after the December 2007, restructuring, irrespective of
the minor changes described above, we preliminary find that in December
2007, both Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking became the successors-
in-interest to Evotape S.p.A. for purposes of determining antidumping
liability.
In conclusion, as a result of both of these determinations, we
preliminary find that Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking should
receive Tyco's antidumping duty cash deposit rate with respect to the
subject merchandise (i.e., 0.00 percent). If the above preliminary
results are affirmed in the Department's final results, the cash
deposit rate resulting from this changed circumstances review will
apply to all entries of the subject merchandise from Evotape Packaging
and Evotape Masking entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of
this changed circumstances review. See Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene
Resin from Italy Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, 68 FR 25327 (May 12, 2003).
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary
results. Written comments may be submitted no later than 14 days after
the date of publication of these preliminary results. Rebuttals to
written comments, limited to issues raised in such comments, may be
filed no later than 21 days after the date of publication of this
notice. All written comments shall be submitted in accordance with 19
CFR 351.303. Any interested party may request a hearing within 14 days
of publication of this notice. Any hearing, if requested, will be held
no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice, or
the first workday thereafter. Persons interested in attending the
hearing, if one is requested, should contact the Department for the
date and time of hearing. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), the
Department will issue the final results of this antidumping duty
changed circumstances review no later than 270 days after the date on
which this review was initiated, or within 45 days if all parties agree
to our preliminary results.
During the course of this antidumping duty changed circumstances
review, cash deposit requirements for the subject merchandise produced
and exported by Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking will continue to
be the all-others rate established in the investigation. See Pressure
Sensitive Plastic Tape From Italy; Determination of Injury or
Likelihood Thereof, 42 FR 44853 (September 7, 1977). The cash deposit
rate requirement for Evotape Packaging and Evotape Masking will be
altered, if warranted, pursuant only to the final results of this
review.
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results and notice
in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3).
Dated: February 22, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-4072 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S