Prohibited Transaction Exemptions and Grant of Individual Exemptions involving: 2010-01; Deutsche Bank, AG (Deutsche Bank or the Applicant), D-11082 and D-11109; 2010-02, State Street Bank and Trust Company, D-11522; and 2010-03, The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon), D-11571, 8117-8128 [2010-3445]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions
and Grant of Individual Exemptions
involving: 2010–01; Deutsche Bank,
AG (Deutsche Bank or the Applicant),
D–11082 and D–11109; 2010–02, State
Street Bank and Trust Company, D–
11522; and 2010–03, The Bank of New
York Mellon (BNY Mellon), D–11571
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of Individual Exemptions.
SUMMARY: This document contains
exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of
the prohibited transaction restrictions of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act)
and/or the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal
Register of the pendency before the
Department of a proposal to grant such
exemption. The notice set forth a
summary of facts and representations
contained in the application for
exemption and referred interested
persons to the application for a
complete statement of the facts and
representations. The application has
been available for public inspection at
the Department in Washington, DC. The
notice also invited interested persons to
submit comments on the requested
exemption to the Department. In
addition the notice stated that any
interested person might submit a
written request that a public hearing be
held (where appropriate). The applicant
has represented that it has complied
with the requirements of the notification
to interested persons. No requests for a
hearing were received by the
Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described
in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption
was issued and the exemption is being
granted solely by the Department
because, effective December 31, 1978,
section 102 of Reorganization Plan No.
4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996),
transferred the authority of the Secretary
of the Treasury to issue exemptions of
the type proposed to the Secretary of
Labor.
Statutory Findings
In accordance with section 408(a) of
the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and the procedures set forth in 29
CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
the entire record, the Department makes
the following findings:
(a) The exemption is administratively
feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests
of the plan and its participants and
beneficiaries; and (c) The exemption is
protective of the rights of the
participants and beneficiaries of the
plan.
Deutsche Bank, AG (Deutsche Bank or
the Applicant) Located in Germany,
with Affiliates in New York, NY and
Other Locations
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
2010–01; Exemption Application Nos.
D–11082 and D–11109.]
Exemption
Section I. Covered Transactions
The restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(A) through (D) and 406(b)(1)
and (b)(2) of the Act (or ERISA), and the
taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b)
of Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code,1
shall not apply, effective July 8, 2008, to
the following foreign exchange
transactions involving less developed
currencies, that are executed by
Deutsche Bank or a current or future
affiliate (domestic or foreign) thereof
that is a bank or broker-dealer, acting as
a local subcustodian where Deutsche
Bank or its affiliates, as asset managers,
have determined to invest the assets of
a client plan held in a separately
managed account, an in-house plan
whose assets are held in a separately
managed account with Deutsche Bank
or its affiliate, or a pooled fund, in
foreign securities, if the conditions set
forth in Sections II, III and IV below are
met with respect to:
(1) A trade-related currency
conversion, or
(2) An income item conversion.
Section II. General Conditions
(a) At the time the foreign exchange
transaction is entered into, the terms of
the transaction are not less favorable to
the client plan, in-house plan or pooled
fund than the terms generally available
in a comparable arm’s length foreign
exchange transaction between unrelated
parties.
(b) The exchange rate used for a
particular foreign exchange transaction
does not deviate by more than 3 percent
(above or below) the interbank bid and
asked rates for such currency at the time
of the transaction as displayed on an
1 For purposes of this exemption, references to
specific provisions of Title I of the Act, unless
otherwise specified, refer also to the corresponding
provisions of the Code.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8117
independent, nationally-recognized
service that reports rates of exchange in
the foreign currency market for such
currency.
(c) The covered transactions are
limited to those less developed
currencies in which a transaction is
executed with Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate acting as local subcustodian at
the direction of the global custodian
because the global custodian either does
not make a market in such currency, or
otherwise determines to execute with
the local subcustodian because of
market conditions, market restrictions,
illiquidity of the currency or similar
exigencies.
(d) Where a market is served by more
than one subcustodian, Deutsche Bank
or its affiliate, as asset manager, has no
decision making authority or role, or
otherwise makes no recommendations
with respect to the global custodian’s
selection of the subcustodian.
(e) The foreign exchange transaction
is executed by Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate thereof acting as subcustodian
at the direction of the global custodian
in the ordinary course of its business as
global custodian.
(f) The decision to select Deutsche
Bank or its affiliate as the subcustodian
is made by an unrelated global
custodian for the relevant account.
(g) The selection of Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate as subcustodian and any
foreign exchange transactions executed
by Deutsche Bank or its affiliate at the
direction of the global custodian are not
part of any agreement, arrangement or
understanding, written or otherwise,
designed to benefit Deutsche Bank, its
affiliate or any other party in interest.
(h) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate, as
asset manager, appoints an independent
fiduciary to receive, review and take
appropriate action, if any, with respect
to the report required by Section II(l)(3)
and the notices in Section III(a) and (c)
on behalf of (1) an in-house plan, or
(2) plans investing in a restricted
pooled fund.
(i) The decision to select Deutsche
Bank or its affiliate as asset manager is
part of an investment strategy that is
adopted by an independent fiduciary of
a client plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account or the
independent fiduciary of an unrelated
pooled fund.
(j) On an annual basis, determined as
of December 31 of the relevant year, the
percentage of assets of in-house plans
and pooled funds in which client plans
invest for which Deutsche Bank and/or
its affiliates select the global custodian
represent less than 20 percent of the
total assets under custody by any such
global custodian.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
8118
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
(k) Foreign affiliates of Deutsche Bank
which engage in the covered
transactions—
(1) Agree to submit to the jurisdiction
of the United States;
(2) Agree to appoint an agent for
service of process in the United States,
which may be an affiliate (the Process
Agent);
(3) Consent to service of process on
the Process Agent;
(4) Agree that they may be sued in the
United States Courts in connection with
the covered transactions described in
this exemption;
(5) Agree that any judgment on behalf
of a plan or pooled fund may be
collected in the United States from
Deutsche Bank; and
(6) Agree to comply with, and be
subject to, all relevant provisions of the
Act.
(l) With respect to the covered
transactions—
(1) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as
asset manager, designates an individual
(the responsible reviewing individual)
who is responsible for periodically (but
no less frequently than on an annual
basis) reviewing a sample of such
foreign exchange transactions to
determine whether the covered
transactions have been executed in
accordance with the terms of this
exemption. Such sample must include a
sufficient number of transactions to
ensure that each affected currency is
tested.
(2) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
provides the responsible reviewing
individual with the records (which may
be provided electronically) described in
Section IV(a)(1)–(7), on an annual basis.
(3) The responsible reviewing
individual notifies Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate as asset manager, the
independent fiduciary of each client
plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account, the
independent fiduciary of an in-house
plan and any restricted pooled fund
required under Section II(h), the
independent fiduciary of an unrelated
pooled fund, and the independent
fiduciary of each plan investing in an
unrestricted pooled fund, of its findings
in a written report within 90 days after
the period to which the periodic review
relates. Such report describes the steps
performed by such individual during
the course of the review, the level of
compliance by Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate with the terms and conditions
of the exemption, and any specific
instances of non-compliance by
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate with the
terms and conditions of the exemption.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Section III. Notice Requirements
(a) At the time Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate is retained as asset manager, or
prior to the initial investment of the
plan’s assets or pooled fund’s assets in
any foreign investments that may
require the execution of a foreign
exchange transaction by Deutsche Bank
or its affiliate as subcustodian, Deutsche
Bank or its affiliate provides the
independent fiduciary of each client
plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account, the
independent fiduciary of each in-house
plan and restricted pooled fund as
required under Section II(h), the
independent fiduciary of each unrelated
pooled fund, and the independent
fiduciary of each plan investing in an
unrestricted pooled fund, a written
notice (which may be effected
electronically) that includes the
following:
(1) The reasons why Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate as asset manager, may
consider a particular market to be an
appropriate investment for the plan or
pooled fund.
(2) The factors considered by
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset
manager, in its selection of a global
custodian (if applicable) including: (i)
The identity of the global custodian; and
(ii) a summary of the global custodian’s
policies and procedures regarding the
handling of foreign exchange
transactions for plans or pooled funds
with respect to which Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate is a fiduciary and the factors
that the global custodian considers in its
selection of a subcustodian.
(3) Notice that such foreign exchange
transaction may be executed by
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as
subcustodian, at the direction of a global
custodian.
(4) A list of the markets in which
plans or pooled funds may invest where
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate serves as
a subcustodian, where a foreign
exchange transaction may be executed
by Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as
subcustodian at the direction of a global
custodian.
(5) A list of the markets where
currency transactions are executed by
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, as
subcustodian, to the extent known.
(6) Notice that Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate maintains records (described in
Section IV), and that such records are
reasonably available at their customary
location for examination in the U.S.,
during normal business hours, by the
responsible reviewing individual, the
independent fiduciary of a client plan
whose assets are held in a separate
account, the independent fiduciary of
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
an in-house plan or a restricted pooled
fund, as required under Section II(h),
the independent fiduciary of an
unrelated pooled fund, the independent
fiduciary of each plan investing in an
unrestricted pooled fund, any
participant or beneficiary of such plan
or pooled fund, or any duly authorized
employee or representative of such
participant or beneficiary.
(7) Copies of the notice of proposed
exemption and the grant of final
exemption with respect to the subject
transactions.
(8) Notice of the definition of the term
‘‘independent’’ under this exemption as
used in the term ‘‘independent
fiduciary,’’ and a request that the
independent fiduciary of a client plan
notify Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
asset manager if, at any time, such
fiduciary is not independent of
Deutsche Bank.
(b) If the independent fiduciary fails
to object in writing to Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate within 30 days following
receipt of the information described in
Section III(a) by such fiduciary, then
such fiduciary’s authorization of the
arrangement contemplated under this
exemption shall be presumed.
(c) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as
asset manager shall provide notification
of any changes to the information
required by Section III, including, but
not limited to, the situation where
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset
manager, replaces the global custodian
with another independent entity or
where there are changes in the markets
in which currency transactions are
executed by the subcustodian. If the
independent fiduciary fails to object in
writing to Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
as asset manager within 30 days
following disclosure of such changes,
such fiduciary’s approval of these
changes shall be presumed.
(d) With respect to pooled funds, in
the event the independent fiduciary of
a client plan submits a notice in writing
to the person engaging in or proposing
to engage in the covered transaction
objecting to the implementation of, a
material change in or continuation of
the arrangement, the plan on whose
behalf the objection was tendered is
given the opportunity to terminate its
investment in the pooled fund without
penalty to the plan, within such time as
may be necessary to effect the
withdrawal in an orderly manner that is
equitable to all withdrawing plans and
to the non-withdrawing plans. In the
case of a plan that elects to so withdraw,
the withdrawal shall be effected prior to
the implementation of a material change
in the arrangement, but an existing
arrangement need not be discontinued
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
by reason of a plan electing to
withdraw.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Section IV. Recordkeeping
Requirements
(a) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
maintains, or causes to be maintained,
for a period of six years from the date
of the covered transactions, the
following records, as well as any records
necessary to enable the persons
described in paragraph (c) of this
Section IV, to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption have been
met:
(1) The account name,
(2) The foreign exchange transaction
execution date,
(3) The exchange rate,
(4) The high and low on Reuters or
similar independent service on the date
of the transaction,
(5) The identity of the foreign
currency sold or purchased,
(6) The amount of foreign currency
sold or purchased,
(7) The amount of U.S. dollars
exchanged, where the exchange is
between foreign currencies and U.S.
dollars or the amount of foreign
currency exchanged, where the
exchange is between two foreign
currencies, and
(8) The annual report described in
Section II(l).
(b) The following are exceptions to
paragraph (a) of this Section IV:
(1) If the records necessary to enable
the persons described in paragraph (c)
to determine whether the conditions of
the exemption have been met are lost or
destroyed, due to circumstances beyond
the control of Deutsche Bank, then no
prohibited transaction will be
considered to have occurred solely on
the basis of the unavailability of those
records; and
(2) No party in interest, other than
Deutsche Bank, shall be subject to the
civil penalty that may be assessed under
section 502(i) of the Act or to the taxes
imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of
the Code if the records are not
maintained or are not available for
examination as required by paragraph
(c) below.
(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(2) of this Section IV and
notwithstanding the provisions of
subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 504
of the Act, the records referred to above
in paragraph (a) of this Section IV are
unconditionally available for
examination during normal business
hours at their customary location to the
following persons or an authorized
representative thereof:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
(i) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department or the
Internal Revenue Service;
(ii) The independent fiduciary of a
client plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account, the
independent fiduciary of an in-house
plan or restricted pooled fund required
under Section II(h), the independent
fiduciary of each unrelated pooled fund,
or the independent fiduciary of each
plan investing in an unrestricted pooled
fund, or
(iii) Any participant or beneficiary of
such plans or pooled funds (described
in paragraph (ii) above) or any duly
authorized employee or representative
of such participant or beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described
above in paragraphs (ii) and (iii) of this
paragraph (c)(1) of this Section IV shall
be authorized to examine trade secrets
of Deutsche Bank, or any commercial or
financial information, which is
privileged or confidential.
(3) Should Deutsche Bank refuse to
disclose information on the basis that
such information is exempt from
disclosure, Deutsche Bank shall, by the
close of the thirtieth (30th) day
following the request, provide written
notice advising that the person of the
reason for the refusal and that the
Department may request such
information.
Section V. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption,
(a) The term ‘‘Deutsche Bank’’ means
Deutsche Bank AG.
(b) An ‘‘affiliate’’ of Deutsche Bank
means any domestic or foreign bank or
broker-dealer that is, directly or
indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with
Deutsche Bank;
(c) The term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual.
(d) The term ‘‘bank’’ means a bank as
defined in section 202(a)(2) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the
Investment Advisers Act), or an
institution that has substantially similar
powers to a bank defined in section
202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act,
and is—
(1) Supervised by the United States or a
State;
(2) Supervised and examined by the
German banking authorities, or monitored
and controlled pursuant to the statutory and
regulatory standards of German law; or
(3) Subject to regulation and oversight by
governmental entities that are substantially
similar to the regulatory oversight of banks
present in the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8119
(e) The term ‘‘broker-dealer’’ means a
broker-dealer registered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or is
engaged in the business of effecting
transactions in securities for the account
of others, and is—
(1) Registered and regulated under the
relevant securities laws of the United
States;
(2) Registered and regulated under the
relevant securities laws of Germany; or
(3) Registered and regulated under the
relevant securities laws of a country
with securities laws that are
substantially similar to the securities
laws governing broker-dealers in the
United States.
(f) The term ‘‘global custodian’’ means
a bank or broker-dealer that is unrelated
to Deutsche Bank or its affiliate, which
is selected by (1) The independent
fiduciary of a client plan in the case of
a separately managed account; (2) the
sponsor (other than Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate) of an unrelated pooled fund;
(3) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset
manager, in the case of an in-house
plan; or (4) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
as asset manager in the case of a pooled
fund established by Deutsche Bank or
an affiliate, for the purpose of holding
and safeguarding the assets of the client
plan, in-house plan, or pooled fund,
physically or through securities
depositories, foreign clearing agencies
or other entities which act as securities
depositories, through its branches or
through its subcustodian network. For
purposes of Section V(f) only, the global
custodian will be unrelated to Deutsche
Bank or its affiliate if the global
custodian is not controlling, controlled
by under common control with
Deutsche Bank, directly or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries.
(g) The term ‘‘subcustodian’’ means a
bank or broker-dealer, selected by a
global custodian, to hold and safekeep
designated assets of the plan or pooled
fund at securities depositories, foreign
clearing agencies or other entities which
act as securities depositories, and at the
direction of the global custodian to
execute foreign exchange transactions
and income item conversions. A
subcustodian has no contractual
relationship with the global custodian’s
clients for custodial or subcustodial
services with respect to the assets
involved in the covered transactions,
but the subcustodian’s contractual
relationship with respect to subcustody
is only with the global custodian.
(h) The term ‘‘responsible reviewing
individual’’ means a senior official
appointed by Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate acting as asset manager, who
has at least 10 years experience with the
fiduciary responsibility provisions of
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
8120
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
the Act, and appropriate compliance
training. Such person is appointed by
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate to review
a sample of the covered transactions
periodically, but no less frequently than
on an annual basis, in order to ensure
compliance with the terms of the
exemption on behalf of a client plan
whose assets are held in a separately
managed account, an in-house plan, or
a pooled fund.
(i) The term ‘‘in-house plan’’ means an
employee benefit plan as described in
section 3(3) of the Act, or a plan as
described in section 4975(e)(1) of the
Code, that is sponsored by Deutsche
Bank or any person that directly or
indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls or is controlled
by, or is under common control with,
Deutsche Bank.
(j) The term ‘‘client plan’’ means an
employee benefit plan, as described in
section 3(3) of the Act, or a plan, as
described in section 4975(e)(1) of the
Code, other than an in-house plan, with
respect to which Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate acts as a fiduciary with
discretionary authority over the
management of the assets involved in
covered transactions (whether or not
any such authority has been delegated
to an unaffiliated sub-adviser).
(k) The term ‘‘pooled fund’’ means a
collective investment fund or a pooled
arrangement: (1) That is deemed to hold
‘‘plan assets’’ (within the meaning of
section 3(42) of the Act and the
regulations thereunder), (2) that holds
assets of at least two or more unrelated
employee benefit plans within the
meaning of section 3(3) of the Act or
plans within the meaning of section
4975(e)(1) of the Code, and (3) for which
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate acts as
fiduciary with discretionary authority
over the management of its assets
(whether or not any such authority has
been delegated to an unaffiliated subadviser).
(l) The term ‘‘restricted pooled fund’’
refers to a pooled fund (1) that is
sponsored and managed by Deutsche
Bank or an affiliate, (2) in which the
total invested assets of an in-house plan
(or in-house plans), if aggregated
(whether invested directly or indirectly
through another pooled fund), represent
20% or more (determined as of the last
day of each month) of the total invested
assets of such pooled fund, and (3) for
which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate will
appoint an independent fiduciary, as
described in Section V(o) below, to
represent the interests of all plans
investing in such fund.
(m) The term ‘‘unrestricted pooled
fund’’ refers to a pooled fund that (1) is
sponsored and managed by Deutsche
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Bank or an affiliate and (2) in which the
total invested assets of an in-house plan
(or in-house plans), if aggregated
(whether invested directly or indirectly
through another pooled fund), represent
less than 20% (determined as of the last
day of each month) of the total invested
assets of such pooled fund.
(n) The term ‘‘unrelated pooled fund’’
refers to a pooled fund that is not
sponsored by Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate, but is managed by either of
these entities.
(o) The term ‘‘independent’’ as used in
the term ‘‘independent fiduciary’’
means—
(1) In the case of a client plan whose
assets are held in a separately managed
account or an unrelated pooled fund, a
plan fiduciary or the named fiduciary of
a pooled fund, or a fiduciary appointed
by the named fiduciary that is unrelated
to, and independent of, Deutsche Bank
and it affiliates. For purposes of this
exemption, a plan fiduciary will be
deemed to be unrelated to, and
independent of, Deutsche Bank if
neither such fiduciary, nor any
individual responsible for the decision
to authorize or terminate authorization
for the transactions described in Section
I, is an officer, director, or highly
compensated employee (within the
meaning of section 4975(e)(2)(H) of the
Code) of Deutsche Bank and such
fiduciary represents that it will advise
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate if those
facts change, or
(2) In the case of the fiduciary
required under Section II(h), in
connection with an in-house plan or in
connection with a restricted pooled
fund, an individual or company is
qualified and independent of Deutsche
Bank and its affiliates if such individual
or company: (i) Has at least 10 years
experience in the financial services
business and significant experience in
foreign currency trading and pricing,
and (ii) certifies that the gross income
received from Deutsche Bank and its
affiliates for the current year does not
exceed 5% of such fiduciary’s gross
income from all services for the prior
fiscal year. The independent fiduciary
shall represent to Deutsche Bank that
such fiduciary is aware of its ERISA
duties and responsibilities in acting as
a fiduciary with respect to an in-house
plan or a restricted pooled fund and the
covered transactions.
(3) In the case of an unrestricted
pooled fund, the persons described in
Section V(o)(1) or (2).
(4) Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this Section V(o), a plan
fiduciary is not independent if—
(i) Such fiduciary directly or
indirectly controls, is controlled by, or
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is under common control with Deutsche
Bank, other than described herein;
(ii) Such fiduciary directly or
indirectly receives any compensation or
other consideration from Deutsche Bank
for his own personal account in
connection with any transaction
described in this exemption in excess of
the 5% gross income limitation set forth
in Section V(o)(2)above;
(iii) Any officer, director or highly
compensated employee (within the
meaning of section 4975(e)(2)(H) of the
Code) of Deutsche Bank or an affiliate
responsible for the transactions
described in Section I is an officer,
director or highly compensated
employee (within the meaning of
section 4975(e)(2)(H) of the Code) of the
client plan sponsor, the sponsor of an
unrelated pooled fund, or of the
fiduciary responsible for the decision to
authorize or terminate authorization for
transactions described in Section I.
However, if such individual is a director
of the client plan sponsor, the sponsor
of an unrelated pooled fund, or of the
responsible fiduciary, and if he or she
abstains from participation in (A) the
choice of Deutsche Bank or an affiliate
as the investment manager/adviser for
the client plan or unrelated pooled fund
and (B) the decision to authorize or
terminate authorization for transactions
described in Section I, then Section
V(o)(4)(iii) shall not apply.
(p) The term ‘‘officer’’ means a
president, any vice president in charge
of a principal business unit, division or
function (such as sales, administration
or finance), or any other officer who
performs a policy-making function for
the entity.
(q) The term ‘‘foreign exchange’’
transaction means the exchange of the
currency of one nation for the currency
of another nation.
(r) The term ‘‘less developed
currencies’’ means those currencies in
which the global custodian does not
make a market at the time of the
transaction and in which the global
custodian determines to purchase from
or sell to the plan’s or pooled fund’s
local subcustodian on behalf of a plan
or pooled fund because the currency is
difficult to trade, undeveloped or the
subject of local government restrictions,
or because of the volatility or lack of
liquidity in the market at the time of the
transaction. The term ‘‘less developed
currencies’’ does not include the
following currencies: The Euro; the
British pound; the Swiss franc, the
Canadian dollar; or the Japanese yen.
(s) The term ‘‘trade-related currency
conversion’’ means the conversion of
trade-related items (i.e., amounts
necessary for purchases or proceeds
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
from sales) into foreign currency or into
U.S. dollars in order to permit purchase
transactions to settle, and to permit
proceeds of sales to be deployed in
other investments or to be used to make
distributions.
(t) The term ‘‘income item
conversions’’ means the conversion of
income items (e.g., interest, dividends,
tax reclaims or other distributions)
denominated in a foreign currency into
U.S. dollars or another foreign currency.
Effective Date: This exemption is
effective as of July 8, 2008.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Written Comments
The proposed exemption gave
interested persons an opportunity to
comment and to request a hearing. In
this regard, all interested persons were
invited to submit written comments
and/or requests for a hearing on the
pending exemption on or before August
22, 2008. During the comment period,
the Department received one written
comment letter and no requests for a
public hearing. The comment was
submitted by the Applicant, and it is
intended to clarify the operative
language and the Summary of Facts and
Representations of the proposed
exemption in a number of areas or to
confirm their validity. A discussion of
the comments and the responses made
by the Department is presented below.
A. Clarifications to the Operative
Language 2
1. Large Pooled Fund and Small
Pooled Fund/Word Substitutions.
Section II(h) of the proposed exemption
states that Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
will appoint an independent fiduciary
to represent the interests of (a) an inhouse plan or (b) plans investing in a
‘‘large pooled fund.’’ The Applicant
explains that the term ‘‘large pooled
fund’’ may be misleading since what is
relevant is not the size of the fund but
the level of in-house plan investment in
such fund. Therefore, the Applicant
requests that the Department change the
term to ‘‘restricted pooled fund.’’
Similarly, the Applicant requests that
the Department revise the term ‘‘small
pooled fund’’ to ‘‘unrestricted pooled
fund.’’
In response to this comment, the
Department has substituted the terms
‘‘restricted pooled fund’’ and
‘‘unrestricted pooled fund’’ for the terms
‘‘large pooled fund’’ and ‘‘small pooled
fund’’ in the final exemption.
2. Investment Decisions by
Independent Fiduciary or Applicant.
2 The clarifications discussed in this section are
also meant to include modifications to the
Summary of Facts and Representations of the
proposal.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Section II(i) of the proposed exemption
requires that the decision by an
independent fiduciary of a client plan,
an in-house plan, a large pooled fund
(redesignated herein as a ‘‘restricted
pooled fund’’) and unrelated pooled
funds to invest in a given market and to
select Deutsche Bank or an affiliate as
asset manager is part of an investment
strategy that is adopted by such
fiduciary. The Applicant requests that
the Department clarify that this
condition requires nothing more than
the authorization specified in Section
III(b) of the proposal. The Applicant
points out that in all instances, the
decision to invest in a given market is
made by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate,
as asset manager, and not by the
independent fiduciary. While a plan’s
independent fiduciary decides on a
general investment strategy (e.g.,
emerging markets debt), the Applicant
points out that such fiduciary may or
may not know the countries to which
plan assets may be committed. The
Applicant also explains that the
decision to commit plan assets to a
particular country and in what amounts
are decisions made by the discretionary
investment manager, which is Deutsche
Bank or an affiliate. Further, in the
context of an in-house plan or a
restricted pooled fund, the Applicant
states that the decision to appoint
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, as asset
manager, is made by Deutsche Bank or
an affiliate, and not by an independent
fiduciary.
In response to this comment, the
Department has revised Section II(i) of
the final exemption to clarify that the
decision to select Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate as asset manager is made by the
independent fiduciary of a client plan
whose assets are held in a separately
managed account or the independent
fiduciary of an unrelated pooled fund.
3. Parties to Receive Notice from the
Responsible Reviewing Individual/Word
Substitutions. Section II(l)(3) of the
proposal describes the parties that are to
be notified by the responsible reviewing
individual as to its determination
whether the covered transactions have
been executed in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the exemption.
Among the persons who are designated
in the proposed exemption as recipients
of periodic written reports from the
responsible reviewing individual are
‘‘Deutsche Bank or its affiliate, the
independent fiduciary of a client plan
whose assets are held in a separately
managed account, the independent
fiduciary of an in-house plan, the
independent fiduciary of a large pooled
fund, the independent fiduciary of an
unrelated pooled fund, or the receiving
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8121
fiduciary of a small pooled fund.’’ The
Applicant requests that Section II(l)(3)
of the proposed exemption be modified
to reflect the substitution of the term
‘‘large’’ with ‘‘restricted’’ and the term
‘‘small’’ with ‘‘unrestricted,’’ as
appropriate, in the context of the term
‘‘pooled fund.’’ The Applicant also asks
that the term ‘‘receiving fiduciary’’ for an
unrestricted pooled fund, as defined in
Section V(q) of the proposal and as used
in Section II(l)(3) be stricken because
the responsible reviewing individual
will notify the independent fiduciary of
each plan investing in an unrestricted
pooled fund directly.
In response to this comment, the
Department has made the requested
modifications to Section II(l)(3), and
deleted Section V(q) of the proposal.
The Department has also made
corresponding revisions to Section III(a)
and Section IV(c)(1)(ii) where these
terms appear, as well.
4. Written Disclosures Provided to the
Independent Fiduciary.
Section II(l)(3) of the proposal
requires that the responsible reviewing
individual notify Deutsche Bank, the
independent fiduciary of each client
plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account, the
independent fiduciary of an in-house
plan and any restricted pooled fund
required under II(h), the independent
fiduciary of unrelated pooled fund, and
the independent fiduciary of each plan
investing in an unrestricted pooled
fund, of its findings in a written report
within 90 days following the period to
which the periodic review relates. Such
report is to be completed annually. The
Applicant states in the preamble to the
proposed exemption (in the last
paragraph of Representation 30) that
within 90 days of a request by the
independent fiduciary, Deutsche Bank
must provide written compliance
reports. The Applicant notes that the
operative language does not contain this
condition. The Applicant believes that
such reports, would be duplicative of
those required by Section II(l) and be
overly burdensome. In response to this
comment, the Department concurs with
the Applicant, and notes that the
exemption does not require additional
reports other than those described in
II(l)(3).
In addition, Section III(a)(4) of the
proposed exemption states that
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is required
to provide written disclosure to an
independent fiduciary of the list of
markets in which plans or pooled funds
invest where Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate serves as a subcustodian.
Representation 30(e) of the Summary of
Facts and Representations adds that
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8122
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
disclosure must be provided as to
whether a particular market is served by
more than one subcustodian. The
Applicant requests confirmation that
this additional disclosure is not
required because it will not have access
to this information.
The Department concurs with the
Applicant’s comment and clarifies that
disclosure of whether a particular
market is served by more than one
subcustodian is not required.
5. Negative Consent by the
Independent Fiduciary. As stated briefly
above, Section III(b) of the proposed
exemption states that if the independent
fiduciary fails to object in writing to
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate within 30
days following the receipt of
information concerning the investment
of a plan or a pooled fund assets in
foreign investments that may require the
execution of foreign exchange
transactions by Deutsche Bank or its
affiliates as subcustodians, then such
fiduciary’s authorization of the
contemplated arrangement will be
presumed. The Applicant suggests that
at the end of Section III(b), in order to
clarify what happens if an independent
fiduciary objects, the following language
should be inserted:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
The independent fiduciary required under
Section II(h) shall not have any authority
under this section. With respect to pooled
funds, in the event the independent fiduciary
submits a notice in writing to the person
engaging in or proposing to engage in the
covered transaction objecting to the
implementation of, material change in or
continuation of the arrangement, the plan on
whose behalf the objection was tendered is
given the opportunity to terminate its
investment in the pooled fund, without
penalty to the plan, within such time as may
be necessary to effect the withdrawal in an
orderly manner that is equitable to all
withdrawing plans and to the nonwithdrawing plans. In the case of a plan that
elects to so withdraw, the withdrawal shall
be affected prior to the implementation of a
material change in the arrangement, but an
existing arrangement need not be
discontinued by reason of a plan electing to
withdraw.
In response to this comment, the
Department has determined to make
some of the changes requested by the
Applicant by adding a new condition
designated as Section III(d). However,
the Department has determined not to
adopt the exclusionary language
appearing in the first sentence of the
above-referenced text, as suggested by
the Applicant, which pertains to the
independent fiduciary required under
Section II(h) because of the independent
fiduciary’s critical role in protecting an
in-house plan or a restricted pooled
fund by taking all actions that are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
necessary and proper on behalf of such
plan or pooled fund. Section III(d) of the
final exemption reads as follows:
With respect to pooled funds, in the event
the independent fiduciary of a client plan
submits a notice in writing to the person
engaging in or proposing to engage in the
covered transaction objecting to the
implementation of, a material change in or
continuation of the arrangement, the plan on
whose behalf the objection was tendered is
given the opportunity to terminate its
investment in the pooled fund without
penalty to the plan, within such time as may
be necessary to effect the withdrawal in an
orderly manner that is equitable to all
withdrawing plans and to the nonwithdrawing plans. In the case of a plan that
elects to so withdraw, the withdrawal shall
be effected prior to the implementation of a
material change in the arrangement, but an
existing arrangement need not be
discontinued by reason of a plan electing to
withdraw.
6. Access to Records by Participants
and Beneficiaries. Section IV(c)(1)(iii) of
the proposed exemption permits any
participant or beneficiary of a plan or a
pooled fund, the assets of which are
involved in foreign exchange
transactions pursuant to the exemption
to have access to the records that the
exemption, requires Deutsche Bank to
maintain. The Applicant has requested
that the Department delete Section
IV(c)(1)(iii) and the reference to such
subsection in Section IV(c)(2) because
the requirement is burdensome. The
Department continues to believe that the
participants and beneficiaries in plans
or pooled funds should have access to
the required records, and accordingly,
has decided not to make the requested
changes.
7. Affiliate Definition. Section V(b) of
the proposed exemption defines the
term ‘‘affiliate’’ of Deutsche Bank as ‘‘any
domestic or foreign bank or brokerdealer directly or indirectly through one
or more intermediaries, controlling,
controlled by, or under common control
with Deutsche Bank.’’ The Applicant has
requested that this definition be
expanded to include: ‘‘any domestic or
foreign investment adviser that is,
directly or indirectly, through one or
more intermediaries, controlling,
controlled by, or under common control
with Deutsche Bank.’’ According to the
Applicant, this addition will ensure that
the exemption is available where an
affiliate of Deutsche Bank, which is a
bank, broker-dealer or investment
adviser, acts as asset manager, rather
than Deutsche Bank, itself.
The Department has determined not
to make the Applicant’s requested
change because it greatly expands the
scope of the relief proposed without an
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
opportunity for notice and comment by
interested persons.
8. Global Custodian Definition.
Section V(f) of the proposed exemption
defines the term ‘‘global custodian’’ as
follows:
The term ‘‘global custodian’’ means a bank
or broker-dealer that is unrelated to Deutsche
Bank or its affiliate, which is selected by (1)
the named fiduciary of a client plan; (2) the
sponsor (other than Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate) of an unrelated pooled fund; (3)
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate in the case of
an in-house plan; or (4) Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate in the case of a pooled fund
established by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate,
for the purpose of holding and safeguarding
all assets of the client plan, in-house plan, or
pooled fund, physically or through a
depository, through its branches or through
its subcustodian network.
For clarity, the Applicant requests
that Section V(f)(1) of the definition be
modified by substituting the term
‘‘named’’ with the term ‘‘independent’’
because Deutsche Bank will not know
whether the plan fiduciary selecting the
global custodian is actually a named
fiduciary because such plan fiduciary
may be the trustee or some other
fiduciary to whom a named fiduciary
has delegated appropriate authority. In
response to this comment, the
Department has made the requested
change.
In addition, the Applicant requests
that, in the last clause of Section V(f),
the word ‘‘all’’ be deleted because some
plans or funds may have more than one
global custodian. Further, the Applicant
suggests that the last clause of Section
V(f) the phrase ‘‘a depository’’ be
substituted with the phrase ‘‘securities
depositories, foreign clearing agencies
or other entities which act as securities
depositories.’’ According to the
Applicant, this will ensure consistency
with Section V(g) of the exemption
which utilizes the latter language. The
Department concurs with the
Applicant’s suggested revisions and has
made the changes in the final
exemption.
In addition, at the Applicant’s
recommendation, the Department has
modified Section V(f) of the final
exemption by clarifying that the term
‘‘unrelated,’’ as used therein, means that
‘‘the global custodian will be unrelated
to Deutsche Bank or its affiliates if the
global custodian is not controlling,
controlled by or under common control
with Deutsche Bank, directly or
indirectly through one or more
intermediaries.’’ Thus, the revised
definition of the term ‘‘global custodian’’
is set forth as follows:
The term ‘‘global custodian’’ means a bank
or broker-dealer that is unrelated to Deutsche
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
Bank or its affiliate, which is selected by (1)
the independent fiduciary of a client plan in
the case of a separately managed account; (2)
the sponsor (other than Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate) of an unrelated pooled fund; (3)
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset
manager in the case of an in-house plan; or
(4) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset
manager in the case of a pooled fund
established by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate,
for the purpose of holding and safeguarding
the assets of the client plan, in-house plan,
or pooled fund, physically or through
securities depositories, foreign clearing
agencies or other entities which act as
securities depositories, through its branches
or through its subcustodian network. For
purposes of Section V(f) only, the global
custodian will be unrelated to Deutsche Bank
or its affiliates if the global custodian is not
controlling, controlled by or under common
control with Deutsche Bank, directly or
indirectly through one or more
intermediaries.
9. In-House Plan Definition. Section
V(i) of the proposed exemption defines
the term ‘‘in-house plan’’ as a ‘‘plan
sponsored by Deutsche Bank or any
person that directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries,
controls or is controlled by, or is under
common control with, Deutsche Bank.’’
The Applicant has requested that the
Department adopt the following
language as the new definition of ‘‘inhouse plan’’ in order to maintain
consistency with the Class Exemption
for Plan Asset Transactions Determined
by In-House Asset Managers (PTE 96–
23) (61 FR 15975, 15982 (April 10,
1996):
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
The term ‘‘in-house plan’’ means a plan
sponsored by Deutsche Bank or any affiliate.
For purposes of the foregoing only, ‘‘affiliate’’
means a member of either (1) a controlled
group of corporations (as defined in section
414(b) of the Code) of which Deutsche Bank
is a member, or (2) a group of trades or
businesses under common control (as
defined in section 414(c) of the Code) of
which Deutsche Bank is a member; provided
that ‘‘50 percent’’ shall be substituted for ‘‘80
percent’’ wherever ‘‘80 percent’’ appears in
section 414(b) or 414(c) or the rules
thereunder.’’
The Department notes that the
Applicant’s suggested definition of ‘‘inhouse plan,’’ which is taken from PTE
96–23 would limit certain plans from
being considered ‘‘in-house plans’’ as
these plans would not come within the
proposed definition. Therefore, the
Department has not adopted the
requested change. Instead, the
Department has modified the definition
of ‘‘in-house plan’’ as follows:
The term ‘‘in-house plan’’ means an
employee benefit plan as described in section
3(3) of the Act, or a plan as described in
section 4975(e)(1) of the Code, that is
sponsored by Deutsche Bank or any person
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
that directly or indirectly, through one or
more intermediaries, controls or is controlled
by, or is under common control with,
Deutsche Bank.
10. Client Plan Definition. Section V(j)
of the proposed exemption defines the
term ‘‘client plan’’ as ‘‘an employee
benefit plan, other than a plan
sponsored by Deutsche Bank, as
described in section 3(3) of the Act or
section 4975(e)(1) of the Code with
respect to which Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate acts as a fiduciary having full
investment discretion.’’ The Applicant
has requested that the definition of
‘‘client plan’’ be modified as follows:
The term ‘‘client plan’’ means an employee
benefit plan, as described in section 3(3) of
the Act, or a plan, as described in section
4975(e)(1) of the Code, other than an inhouse plan, with respect to which Deutsche
Bank or its affiliate acts as a fiduciary with
discretionary authority over the management
of the assets involved in covered transactions
(whether or not any such authority has been
delegated to an unaffiliated sub-adviser).
The Applicant states that the revised
definition clarifies Deutsche Bank’s role
with respect to plan assets because the
meaning of the phrase ‘‘full investment
discretion,’’ as used in the client plan
definition, is unclear. In addition, the
Applicant states that the modification
ensures that separately managed
accounts that are sub-advised by a third
party are included within the scope of
exemptive relief.
In response to this comment, the
Department has made the Applicant’s
requested revision in the final
exemption.
11. Pooled Fund Definition. Section
V(k) of the proposed exemption defines
the term ‘‘pooled fund’’ as follows:
The term ‘‘pooled fund’’ means a collective
investment fund or a pooled arrangement
established for investment on behalf of two
or more unrelated employee benefit plans by
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate or by a fund
sponsor other than Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate for which Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate acts as fiduciary with full investment
discretion. The assets of a pooled fund may
include the assets of (i) client plans, (ii) inhouse plans of Deutsche Bank or an affiliate,
(iii) other pooled funds in which Deutsche
Bank or an affiliate is not the fund sponsor,
and (iv) other pooled funds in which
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is the fund
sponsor.
The Applicant has suggested that this
definition be deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following definition:
The term ‘‘pooled fund’’ means a collective
investment fund or a pooled arrangement—
(1) that is deemed to hold ‘‘plan assets’’
(within the meaning of section 3(42) of Act
and the regulations thereunder), (2) that
holds assets of at least two or more unrelated
employee benefit plans within the meaning
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8123
of section 3(3) of Act or plans within the
meaning of section 4975(e)(1) of the Code,
and (3) for which Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate acts as fiduciary with discretionary
authority over the management of its assets
(whether or not any such authority has been
delegated to an unaffiliated sub-adviser).
The Applicant believes that the
requested change provides clarification
that the exemption applies to pooled
funds only when they are deemed to
hold plan assets. Moreover, the
Applicant states that the revised
definition acknowledges that non-plan
investors may be invested in pooled
funds that hold plan assets. In response
to this comment, the Department has
made the requested change.3
12. Large Pooled Fund Redefined/
Word Substitution. Section V(l) of the
proposed exemption defines the term
‘‘large pooled fund’’ as follows:
The term ‘‘large pooled fund’’ refers to a
pooled fund that is sponsored and managed
by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate. A large
pooled fund may include the assets of (i)
client plans, (ii) in-house plans of Deutsche
Bank or an affiliate, (iii) other pooled funds
in which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is not
the fund sponsor, and (iv) other pooled funds
in which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is the
fund sponsor. In a large pooled fund, the
total invested assets of an in-house plan (or
in-house plans), if aggregated (whether
invested directly or indirectly through
another pooled fund), represent more than
20% of the total invested assets of such fund.
Also, in a large pooled fund, Deutsche Bank
will appoint an independent fiduciary, as
described in Section V(o) below, to represent
the interests of all plans investing in such
fund.
The Applicant has requested that the
term ‘‘large pooled fund’’ be changed to
‘‘restricted pooled fund’’ as it appears
throughout the proposed exemption and
as defined in Section V(l). In the
Applicant’s view, the modified language
more accurately describes this term.
In response to this comment, the
Department has replaced the term ‘‘large
pooled fund’’ with ‘‘restricted pooled
fund’’ throughout the operative language
of the final exemption. The Department
also notes the corresponding changes to
the Summary of Facts and
Representations.
In addition, the Applicant has
requested that the definition of the term
‘‘large pooled fund’’ be replaced with the
following new definition:
The term ‘‘restricted pooled fund’’ refers to
a pooled fund (i) that is sponsored by
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, (ii) in which
the total invested assets of an in-house plan
(or in-house plans), if aggregated (whether
3 For consistency in the formatting of the final
exemption, the Department has also replaced the
romanettes with numbers for the investment
vehicles defined in Comments 11–13 above.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8124
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
invested directly or indirectly through
another pooled fund), represent 20% or more
(determined as of the last day of each month)
of the total invested assets of such pooled
fund, and (iii) for which Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate will appoint an independent
fiduciary, as described in Section V(o) below,
to represent the interests of all plans
investing in such fund.
The Applicant states that the revised
definition omits the reference to
Deutsche Bank’s management because
the revised definition of ‘‘pooled fund’’
already references Deutsche Bank’s
management. In addition, the Applicant
explains that the revised definition
acknowledges that non-plan investors
often invest in pooled funds that hold
plan assets and requires monthly testing
of the level of in-house plan investment.
The Department concurs, in part, with
the Applicant’s revised definition of the
term ‘‘restricted pooled fund.’’ However,
the Department has decided to leave the
reference to Deutsche Bank’s or its
affiliate’s management authority intact
in the final exemption in order to
emphasize that Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate sponsors the restricted pooled
fund and has discretion over the assets
of such pooled fund. Therefore, the
revised definition of the term restricted
pooled fund reads as follows:
The term ‘‘restricted pooled fund’’ refers to
a pooled fund (1) that is sponsored and
managed by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, (2)
in which the total invested assets of an inhouse plan (or in-house plans), if aggregated
(whether invested directly or indirectly
through another pooled fund), represent 20%
or more (determined as of the last day of each
month) of the total invested assets of such
pooled fund, and (3) for which Deutsche
Bank or an affiliate will appoint an
independent fiduciary, as described in
Section V(o) below, to represent the interests
of all plans investing in such fund.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
13. Small Pooled Fund Redefined/
Word Substitution. Section V(m) of the
proposed exemption defines the term
‘‘small pooled fund’’ as follows:
The term ‘‘small pooled fund’’ refers to a
pooled fund that is sponsored and managed
by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate. A small
pooled fund may include the assets of (i)
client plans, (ii) in-house plans of Deutsche
Bank or an affiliate, (iii) other pooled funds
in which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is not
the fund sponsor, and (iv) other pooled funds
in which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is the
fund sponsor. In a small pooled fund, the
total invested assets of an in-house plan (or
in-house plans), if aggregated (whether
invested directly or through another pooled
fund), represent less than 20% of the total
invested assets of such fund.
The Applicant has requested that the
term ‘‘small pooled fund’’ be changed to
‘‘unrestricted pooled fund.’’ Also, for the
same reasons expressed above by the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Applicant for modifying the term ‘‘large
pooled fund,’’ the Applicant requests
that Section V(m) be revised to the
following:
The term ‘‘unrestricted pooled fund’’ refers
to a pooled fund that (1) is sponsored by
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate and (2) in
which the total invested assets of an in-house
plan (or in-house plans), if aggregated
(whether invested directly or indirectly
through another pooled fund), represent less
than 20% (determined as of the last day of
each month) of the total invested assets of
such pooled fund.
The Department concurs with the
Applicant’s revised definition of the
term ‘‘unrestricted pooled fund,’’ with
the exception of deleting the reference
to Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
managing the fund, and has made
appropriate changes in the final
exemption. The revised definition reads
as follows:
The term ‘‘unrestricted pooled fund’’ refers
to a pooled fund that (1) is sponsored and
managed by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate and
(2) in which the total invested assets of an
in-house plan (or in-house plans), if
aggregated (whether invested directly or
indirectly through another pooled fund),
represent less than 20% (determined as of the
last day of each month) of the total invested
assets of such pooled fund.
B. Confirmations
1. Fee Disclosures. The Applicant
points out that in the proposed
exemption, Representation 30(c) of the
Summary of Facts and Representations
provides for the disclosure of all fees
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate may
receive as a result of the covered
transactions. However, the Applicant
notes that there is no such requirement
in the operative language of the
proposal. The Applicant explains that
the proposed exemption only requires
that Deutsche Bank or its affiliate retain
records that specify the price at which
the transaction occurred, which is
acceptable to the Applicant. Therefore,
the Applicant requests that the final
exemption reflect that the disclosure of
‘‘all fees’’ should not be required, but
that the rate and other market
information should be required.
The Department does not concur with
the Applicant’s reasoning. To the extent
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate are able to
make appropriate fee disclosures to
independent fiduciaries without undue
burden, the Department would require
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate to provide
this information.
2. Exemptive Relief for the Global
Custodian. The Applicant has asked the
Department to confirm that no
exemptive relief is necessary if the
global custodian makes a market in a
particular currency and executes the
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
foreign exchange transaction as
principal. The Applicant explains that
although a global custodian would be
engaged in a principal transaction, it
might receive a ticket charge, as it
would for any transaction. However, the
Applicant believes that it is very
unlikely that the global custodian would
receive a ticket charge given that the
plan would be engaging in a foreign
exchange transaction through the global
custodian’s custody network. The
Applicant also emphasizes that because
it is unaware of the policies of each
global custodian, it can only make
generalized assertions about such
policies.
In response to this comment, the
Department believes that this comment
is beyond the scope of the exemption.
The Department notes that exemptive
relief may be available for the global
custodian under section 408(b)(18) of
the Act to the extent the conditions
therein are satisfied.4
3. Application of Foreign Laws. The
Applicant has requested the Department
to confirm that Section II(k) does not
preclude the application of foreign laws.
Section II(k) of the exemption requires
that:
Foreign affiliates of Deutsche Bank which
engage in the covered transactions—
(1) Agree to submit to the jurisdiction of
the United States;
(2) Agree to appoint an agent for service of
process in the United States, which may be
an affiliate (the Process Agent);
(3) Consent to service of process on the
Process Agent;
4 Section 408(b)(18) of the Act is a statutory
exemption that was enacted under the Pension
Protection Act of 2006. This statutory exemption
provides relief from section 406(a) of the Act and
limited relief from section 406(b) of the Act for
custodians or trustees with respect to foreign
exchange transactions between a bank or brokerdealer (or an affiliate of either) and a plan with
respect to which such bank or broker-dealer (or
affiliate) is a trustee, custodian, fiduciary or other
party in interest if,—(1) the transaction is in
connection with the purchase, holding or sale of
securities or other investment assets (other than a
foreign exchange transaction unrelated to any other
investment in securities or other investment assets);
(2) at the time the foreign exchange transaction is
entered into, the terms of the transaction are not
less favorable to the plan than the terms generally
available in comparable arm’s length foreign
exchange transactions between unrelated parties, or
the terms afforded by the bank or broker-dealer (or
an affiliate of either) in comparable arm’s-length
foreign exchange transactions involving unrelated
parties; (3) the exchange rate used by such bank or
broker-dealer (or affiliate) for a particular foreign
exchange transaction does not deviate by more than
3 percent from the interbank bid and asked rates for
transactions of comparable size and maturity at the
time of the transaction as displayed on an
independent service that reports rates of exchange
in the foreign currency market for such currency;
and (4) the bank or broker-dealer (or any affiliate
of either) does not have investment discretion or
provide investment advice with respect to the
transaction.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
(4) Agree that they may be sued in the
United
States Courts in connection with the
covered transactions described in this
proposed exemption;
(5) Agree that any judgment on behalf of
a plan or pooled fund may be collected in the
United States from Deutsche Bank; and
(6) Agree to comply with, and be subject
to, all relevant provisions of the Act.
In response, the Department notes
that this section does not preclude the
application of foreign laws, but rather
provides a means for a plan to seek a
judgment in the courts of the United
States if a claim arises in connection
with the covered transactions. In
addition, to the extent those foreign
laws preclude a foreign affiliate of
Deutsche Bank from meeting the
conditions of the exemption, such
affiliate may not rely on the relief
provided by this exemption.
4. Development of Policies and
Procedures by Global Custodian. The
Applicant requests that the Department
confirm that Section III(a) does not
require the global custodian to develop
any special policies and procedures
regarding the handling of foreign
exchange transactions for plans or
pooled funds with respect to which
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate is a
fiduciary or disclose to Deutsche Bank
the factors that the global custodian
considers in its selection of a
subcustodian.
In response to this comment, the
Department notes that the requirements
of Section III(a) relate exclusively to the
information that Deutsche Bank must
provide to certain designated persons.
For a complete statement of the facts
and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption that was published
in the Federal Register on July 8, 2008
at 73 FR 39158. For further information
regarding the Applicant’s comment
letter or other matters discussed herein,
interested persons are encouraged to
obtain copies of the exemption
application files (Exemption
Application Nos. D–11082 and D–
11109) the Department is maintaining in
this case. The application files, as well
as all supplemental submissions
received by the Department, are made
available for public inspection in the
Public Disclosure Room of the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Room N–1513, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
The Applicant’s comment letter may
also be viewed online at https://
www.regulations.gov, at Docket ID
Number: EBSA–2008–0006.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Accordingly, after giving full
consideration to the entire record,
including the Applicant’s comment
letters and supplements, the Department
has decided to grant the exemption.
For Further Information Contact:
Allison Padams-Lavigne, U.S.
Department of Labor, telephone (202)
693–8564. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
State Street Bank and Trust Company;
Located in Massachusetts
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
No. 2010–02; Application No. D–11522.]
Exemption
The restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(A) and (D) and 406(b) of the
Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A), (D),
(E), and (F) of the Code, shall not apply
as of October 24, 2008, to the cash sale
of certain mortgage, mortgage-related,
and other asset-backed securities for
$2,447,381,010 (the Sale) by stable value
commingled funds and separate
accounts both holding assets of
employee benefit plans (the Accounts)
to State Street Bank and Trust Company
(State Street), the investment manager
and/or trustee for the Accounts,
provided that the conditions set forth
below are met.
(a) The Sale was a one-time
transaction for cash payment made on a
delivery versus payment basis.
(b) The Accounts did not bear any
commissions or transaction costs in
connection with the Sale.
(c) The Accounts received as a
purchase price for the securities an
amount which, as of the effective date
of the Sale, was equal to the fair market
value of the securities, determined by
reference to prices provided by
independent third-party pricing sources
consulted in accordance with pricing
procedures used by the Accounts prior
to the transaction.
(d) In connection with the Sale, State
Street transferred to and allocated
among the Accounts cash in the amount
of $450,000,000.
(e) At the time of the transaction,
State Street, as trustee of the Accounts,
determined (except with respect to the
State Street Salary Savings Program, an
employee benefit plan maintained for
employees of State Street and certain
affiliates (the State Street Plan)) that the
Sale was appropriate for and in the best
interests of the Accounts and the
employee benefit plans invested in the
Accounts. An independent fiduciary
determined at the time of the
transaction that the Sale was
appropriate for and in the best interest
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8125
of the State Street Plan and its
participants and beneficiaries.
(f) An independent consultant
reviewed, after the Sale, the
reasonableness of the prices used to
purchase the securities, and concluded
that the pricing methodology used by
State Street provided a reasonable basis
for determining the fair market value of
the securities and that the methodology
was reasonably applied with only
immaterial deviations.
(g) In carrying out the Sale, State
Street took all appropriate actions
necessary to safeguard the interests of
each Account and each employee
benefit plan with a direct or indirect
interest in an Account.
(h) State Street and its affiliates, as
applicable, will maintain, or cause to be
maintained, for a period of six (6) years
from the date of the Sale such records
as are necessary to enable the persons
described below in paragraph (i)(i) to
determine whether the conditions of
this exemption have been met, except
that—
(i) No party in interest with respect to
a plan which engaged in the covered
transaction, other than State Street and
its affiliates, as applicable, shall be
subject to a civil penalty under section
502(i) of the Act or the taxes imposed
by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code,
if such records are not maintained or are
not available for examination as
required by paragraph (i) below; and
(ii) A separate prohibited transaction
shall not be considered to have occurred
solely because due to circumstances
beyond the control of State Street or its
affiliate, as applicable, such records are
lost or destroyed prior to the end of the
six-year period.
(i)(i) Except as provided below, in
paragraph (ii), and notwithstanding any
provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b)
of sections 504 of the Act, the records
referred to in paragraph (h) above, are
unconditionally available at their
customary location for examination
during normal business hours by—
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department, the
Internal Revenue Service, the Securities
and Exchange Commission or the
Federal Reserve Board;
(B) Any fiduciary of any plan that
engaged in the covered transaction, or
any duly authorized employee or
representative of such fiduciary;
(C) Any employer of participants and
beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are
covered by a plan that engages in the
covered transactions, or any authorized
employee or representative of these
entities; or
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8126
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of
a plan that engages in the covered
transactions, or duly authorized
employee or representative of such
participant or beneficiary;
(ii) None of the persons described
above in subparagraphs (B)–(D) of
paragraph (i)(i) are authorized to
examine the trade secrets of State Street
or commercial or financial information
that is privileged or confidential.
(iii) Should State Street refuse to
disclose information on the basis that
such information is exempt from
disclosure, State Street shall, by the
close of the thirtieth (30th) day
following the request, provide written
notice advising that person of the reason
for the refusal and that the Department
may request such information.
The Department received one
comment regarding the proposed
exemption. At the Department’s request,
State Street submitted a response to the
comment. A discussion of the
commenter’s assertions, State Street’s
responses, and the Department’s views
follows.
The commenter first stated that State
Street failed to disclose certain
information to the Department.
Specifically, the commenter cited
several news items reporting on
litigation involving State Street that the
commenter believed to be relevant to
the pending exemption. The commenter
also asserted that State Street concealed
certain matters from the Department,
most notably, the fact that the SEC had
issued a ‘‘Wells Notice’’ to State Street,
indicating that the staff of the SEC is
recommending enforcement action
against the company for violations of
the antifraud provisions of the federal
securities laws, relating to the
disclosure and management of State
Street’s active fixed income strategies
during 2007 and prior periods.5 Finally,
the commenter stated that State Street
had not provided all the information
required by the Department’s
regulations at 29 CFR 2570.34 and 35.
The commenter indicated that the
application did not include required
contact information about individual
plans affected by the exemption.
In addition, the commenter took the
position that the criteria established
under section 408(a) of ERISA for the
5 The commenter identified two other matters that
State Street had omitted from its application: First,
that a partner in the law firm that represented State
Street with respect to the exemption application,
Ropes & Gray, was a member of State Street’s Board
of Directors and was chairman of its Executive
Committee during the relevant time period; and
second, that State Street sought a regulatory
exemption from the SEC in 2002 with respect to the
types of securities that could be used as collateral
in securities lending transactions.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
grant of an exemption would not be
satisfied with respect to the pending
exemption, in that the exemption would
not serve the interests of the affected
plans and their participants and
beneficiaries.6 The commenter stated
that the exemption would ‘‘paper[] over
information that would enable the
Named Plans and their respective
participants and beneficiaries to pursue
the fiduciary for additional underlying
breaches.’’ Further, the commenter
asserted that participants in the State
Street Salary Savings Program who were
invested in the State Street Company
Stock Fund saw the value of their
accounts decline as a result of actions
taken by State Street management at the
time of the transaction that is the subject
of the proposed exemption. The
commenter requested that the
Department hold a public hearing, or,
alternatively, require State Street to
disclose all pending lawsuits filed by
employee benefit plans, as well as the
contact information and employer
identification number for all plans
invested in any fund cited in the
application, as well as certain other
State Street funds.
In response, State Street stated that
the news items identified by the
commenter are not relevant to the
transaction covered by the proposed
exemption. In that regard, State Street
pointed out that the news items did not
involve funds affected by the proposed
exemption, and pertain to events that
occurred after the publication of the
proposed exemption. State Street noted
that the SEC Wells Notice was disclosed
to the Department on July 8, 2009, and
also was generally available as part of a
public filing. State Street asserted that
the other matters omitted from the
application are not relevant to the
Department’s consideration of the
proposed exemption. State Street stated
that it believes it satisfied the
requirements of the Department’s
regulations with respect to disclosures
in its application.
The Department has carefully
considered the issues raised by the
commenter and the Applicant’s
responses. The Department does not
believe that any of the news items or
allegedly concealed or omitted matters
would have materially affected the
6 Section 408(a) of ERISA provides that an
exemption may not be granted unless the Secretary
of Labor finds that the exemption is: ‘‘(1)
administratively feasible, (2) in the interests of the
plan and of its participants and beneficiaries, and
(3) protective of the rights of participants and
beneficiaries of such plan.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department’s decision to propose, and
ultimately, grant the exemption.7
With respect to plan contact
information, the Department requested
and the Applicant agreed to supplement
its application with contact information
for affected plans that were managed in
separate accounts. As to plans invested
in pooled funds, the Department’s
regulations at 29 CFR 2570.35 require
disclosure of information with respect
to the pooled funds as opposed to
individual investing plans. See 29 CFR
2570.35(c)(2). State Street’s original
application provided the employer
identification number for the pooled
funds. Because the pooled funds are
sponsored by State Street, the
Department does not believe it is
necessary to have additional contact
information on file for the pooled funds.
Finally, the Department has
determined that the exemption does
satisfy the criteria established in section
408(a) of ERISA, including the
requirement that the exemption be in
the interests of the affected plans and
their participants and beneficiaries. The
Department does not believe that the
grant of the exemption will undermine
any rights that a plan participant or
beneficiary might have against State
Street as fiduciary. The Department’s
view is that by purchasing distressed
securities (the Selected Assets) and
making an additional cash infusion into
the affected Accounts, State Street took
actions designed to protect the interests
of the plans invested in those Accounts.
The Department believes that the
Applicant was persuasive in arguing
that it was necessary to remove the
Selected Assets from the Accounts in
order to reduce the likelihood that the
wrap providers would terminate their
contracts, thereby depriving the
Accounts of ‘‘book value’’ treatment of
plan investments. In this regard, the
Department notes that the identification
of the Selected Assets was confirmed by
an independent consultant. In addition,
the sale price of the Selected Assets was
determined by independent third party
pricing services and confirmed as
reasonable by an independent
consultant.8
7 The Department notes that the SEC Wells Notice
was disclosed to the Department as stated by the
Applicants.
8 The commenter suggested that the Department
deny the exemption, thereby requiring State Street
to pay an excise tax pursuant to section 4975 of the
Internal Revenue Code, so that ‘‘State Street’s
incumbent management will face intra-corporate
measures to remove bad managers and executives.’’
The Department notes that if the exemption were
denied, not only would State Street be required to
pay an excise tax under section 4975 of the Code,
it also would be required to ‘‘correct’’ the
transaction, possibly by returning the Selected
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
The Department has determined not
to hold a public hearing with respect to
the proposed exemption. The
Department’s regulations provide that a
hearing will be held where necessary to
fully explore material factual issues
identified by the person requesting the
hearing. See 29 CFR 2570.46. In this
case, the Department concludes that the
commenter has not identified any
material factual issues that would
require a hearing.
With respect to the additional
disclosure requested by the commenter,
the Department’s regulations require
disclosure of much of the information
requested by the commenter, including
lawsuits against the applicant
concerning the applicant’s conduct as a
fiduciary or party in interest with
respect to any plan, as well as contact
information/EIN for affected plans or
pooled funds. The Department believes
that the additional disclosure requested
by the commenter regarding plans that
are not affected by the exemption is
beyond the scope of the Department’s
exemption procedure regulation and
this proceeding.
Accordingly, after giving full
consideration to the entire record,
including the written comment, the
Department has determined to grant the
exemption. For a more complete
statement of the facts and
representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption published on
September 25, 2009, at 74 FR 49031.
For Further Information Contact:
Karen E. Lloyd of the Department, at
(202) 693–8554. This is not a toll-free
number.
The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY
Mellon or the Applicant) Located in
New York, NY
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
2010–03; Exemption Application No. D–
11571.]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Exemption
The restrictions of sections 406(a) and
406(b)(1) and 406(b)(2) of the Act and
the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A)
through (E) of the Code, shall not apply
as of February 20, 2009, to the cash sale
of certain floating rate securities (the
Securities) issued by Lehman Brothers
Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (together,
Lehman) for an aggregate purchase price
of $235,737,419.05 by the EB Temporary
Assets to the Accounts. The Department does not
believe that this would be a favorable result for the
Accounts and their investing plans.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Investment Fund—Lehman (Liquidating
Fund), the EB SMAM Short Term
Investment Fund—Lehman (Liquidating
Fund), the DF Temporary Investment
Fund—Lehman (Liquidating Fund) and
the Pooled Employee Daily Liquidity
Fund—Lehman (Liquidating Fund)
(collectively, the Liquidating Funds) to
the Bank of New York Mellon
Corporation (BNYMC), a party in
interest with respect to employee
benefit plans (the Plans) invested,
directly or indirectly, in the Liquidating
Funds. This exemption is subject to the
following conditions:
(a) The sale was a one-time
transaction for cash;
(b) The Liquidating Funds received an
amount for the sale of the Securities,
which was equal to the sum of (1) The
par value of the Securities plus (2)
accrued but unpaid interest through
September 12, 2008, determined at the
contract rate, plus (3) accrued and
unpaid interest from September 15,
2008 through the earlier of (i) the date
of sale or (ii) the maturity date of the
Securities, determined at the investment
earnings rate of the collective fund from
which the Securities were transferred to
the Liquidating Fund for the period
from September 15, 2008 to the earlier
of the maturity date of the Security or
February 20, 2009;
(c) The Liquidating Funds did not
bear any commissions, fees, transaction
costs or other expenses in connection
with the sale of the Securities;
(d) BNY Mellon, as trustee of the
Liquidating Funds, determined that the
sale of the Securities was appropriate
for and in the best interests of the
Liquidating Funds, and the Plans
invested, directly or indirectly, in the
Liquidating Funds, at the time of the
transaction;
(e) BNY Mellon took all appropriate
actions necessary to safeguard the
interests of the Liquidating Funds, and
the Plans invested, directly or
indirectly, in the Liquidating Funds, in
connection with the transaction;
(f) If the exercise of any of BNYMC’s
rights, claims or causes of action in
connection with its ownership of the
Securities results in BNYMC recovering
from Lehman, the issuer of the
Securities, or from any third party, an
aggregate amount that is more than the
sum of:
(1) the purchase price paid for the
Securities by BNYMC; and
(2) interest on the par value of the
Securities from and after the date
BNYMC purchased the Securities from
the Liquidating Funds, determined at
the last-published interest rate on the
Securities preceding the Lehman’s
bankruptcy filing, BNYMC refunds such
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8127
excess amount promptly to the
Liquidating Funds (after deducting all
reasonable expenses incurred in
connection with the recovery);
(g) BNY Mellon and its affiliates, as
applicable, maintain, or cause to be
maintained, for a period of six (6) years
from the date of any covered transaction
such records as are necessary to enable
the person described below in
paragraph (h)(1), to determine whether
the conditions of this exemption have
been met, except that—
(1) No party in interest with respect
to a Plan which engages in the covered
transaction, other than BNY Mellon and
its affiliates, as applicable, shall be
subject to a civil penalty under section
502(i) of the Act or the taxes imposed
by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code,
if such records are not maintained, or
not available for examination, as
required, below, by paragraph (h)(1);
(2) A separate prohibited transaction
shall not be considered to have occurred
solely because due to circumstances
beyond the control of BNY Mellon or its
affiliates, as applicable, such records are
lost or destroyed prior to the end of the
six-year period;
(h)(1) Except as provided, below, in
paragraph (h)(2), and notwithstanding
any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and
(b) of section 504 of the Act, the records
referred to, above, in paragraph (g) are
unconditionally available at their
customary location for examination
during normal business hours by—
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department, the
Internal Revenue Service, or the
Securities and Exchange Commission;
or
(B) Any fiduciary of any Plan that
engages in the covered transaction, or
any duly authorized employee or
representative of such fiduciary; or
(C) Any employer of participants and
beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are
covered by a Plan that engages in the
covered transaction, or any authorized
employee or representative of these
entities; or
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of
a Plan that engages in the covered
transaction, or duly authorized
employee or representative of such
participant or beneficiary;
(2) None of the persons described
above, in paragraph (h)(1)(B)–(D) shall
be authorized to examine trade secrets
of BNY Mellon or its affiliates, or
commercial or financial information
which is privileged or confidential; and
(3) Should BNY Mellon refuse to
disclose information on the basis that
such information is exempt from
disclosure, BNY Mellon shall, by the
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8128
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
close of the thirtieth (30th) day
following the request, provide a written
notice advising that person of the
reasons for the refusal and that the
Department may request such
information.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption published on
November 16, 2009 at 74 FR 58992.
For Further Information Contact: Mr.
Anh-Viet Ly of the Department at (202)
693–8648. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
General Information
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which among other things
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) This exemption is supplemental to
and not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transactional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption
is subject to the express condition that
the material facts and representations
contained in the application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of
February, 2010.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2010–3445 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Application Nos. and Proposed
Exemptions; D–11514]
Citigroup Inc. and Its Affiliates
(Citigroup or the Applicant); Subaru of
America, Inc. (Subaru); and The Bank
of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon); et
al.; Proposed Exemptions
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemptions.
SUMMARY: This document contains
notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
proposed exemptions from certain of the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code).
Written Comments and Hearing
Requests
All interested persons are invited to
submit written comments or requests for
a hearing on the pending exemptions,
unless otherwise stated in the Notice of
Proposed Exemption, within 45 days
from the date of publication of this
Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1)
the name, address, and telephone
number of the person making the
comment or request, and (2) the nature
of the person’s interest in the exemption
and the manner in which the person
would be adversely affected by the
exemption. A request for a hearing must
also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the
evidence to be presented at the hearing.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and
requests for a hearing (at least three
copies) should be sent to the Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Exemption
Determinations, Room N–5700, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Attention: Application No., lll ,
stated in each Notice of Proposed
Exemption. Interested persons are also
invited to submit comments and/or
hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or
FAX. Any such comments or requests
should be sent either by e-mail to:
‘‘moffitt.betty@dol.gov’’, or by FAX to
(202) 219–0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The
applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: If you submit written
comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or
confidential business information that
you do not want to be publiclydisclosed. All comments and hearing
requests are posted on the Internet
exactly as they are received, and they
can be retrieved by most Internet search
engines. The Department will make no
deletions, modifications or redactions to
the comments or hearing requests
received, as they are public records.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed exemptions were requested in
applications filed pursuant to section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in
accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (55 FR
32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section
102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Therefore, these notices of proposed
exemption are issued solely by the
Department.
The applications contain
representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are
summarized below. Interested persons
are referred to the applications on file
with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and
representations.
Citigroup Inc. and Its Affiliates
(Citigroup or the Applicant), Located in
New York, New York
[Application No. D–11514.]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act
and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8117-8128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3445]
[[Page 8117]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions and Grant of Individual
Exemptions involving: 2010-01; Deutsche Bank, AG (Deutsche Bank or the
Applicant), D-11082 and D-11109; 2010-02, State Street Bank and Trust
Company, D-11522; and 2010-03, The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY
Mellon), D-11571
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of Individual Exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of the prohibited transaction
restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA or the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal Register of the pendency
before the Department of a proposal to grant such exemption. The notice
set forth a summary of facts and representations contained in the
application for exemption and referred interested persons to the
application for a complete statement of the facts and representations.
The application has been available for public inspection at the
Department in Washington, DC. The notice also invited interested
persons to submit comments on the requested exemption to the
Department. In addition the notice stated that any interested person
might submit a written request that a public hearing be held (where
appropriate). The applicant has represented that it has complied with
the requirements of the notification to interested persons. No requests
for a hearing were received by the Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption was issued and the exemption is
being granted solely by the Department because, effective December 31,
1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1
(1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to
issue exemptions of the type proposed to the Secretary of Labor.
Statutory Findings
In accordance with section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code and the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes the following findings:
(a) The exemption is administratively feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests of the plan and its
participants and beneficiaries; and (c) The exemption is protective of
the rights of the participants and beneficiaries of the plan.
Deutsche Bank, AG (Deutsche Bank or the Applicant) Located in Germany,
with Affiliates in New York, NY and Other Locations
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2010-01; Exemption Application
Nos. D-11082 and D-11109.]
Exemption
Section I. Covered Transactions
The restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A) through (D) and 406(b)(1)
and (b)(2) of the Act (or ERISA), and the taxes imposed by section
4975(a) and (b) of Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E)
of the Code,\1\ shall not apply, effective July 8, 2008, to the
following foreign exchange transactions involving less developed
currencies, that are executed by Deutsche Bank or a current or future
affiliate (domestic or foreign) thereof that is a bank or broker-
dealer, acting as a local subcustodian where Deutsche Bank or its
affiliates, as asset managers, have determined to invest the assets of
a client plan held in a separately managed account, an in-house plan
whose assets are held in a separately managed account with Deutsche
Bank or its affiliate, or a pooled fund, in foreign securities, if the
conditions set forth in Sections II, III and IV below are met with
respect to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this exemption, references to specific
provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer
also to the corresponding provisions of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) A trade-related currency conversion, or
(2) An income item conversion.
Section II. General Conditions
(a) At the time the foreign exchange transaction is entered into,
the terms of the transaction are not less favorable to the client plan,
in-house plan or pooled fund than the terms generally available in a
comparable arm's length foreign exchange transaction between unrelated
parties.
(b) The exchange rate used for a particular foreign exchange
transaction does not deviate by more than 3 percent (above or below)
the interbank bid and asked rates for such currency at the time of the
transaction as displayed on an independent, nationally-recognized
service that reports rates of exchange in the foreign currency market
for such currency.
(c) The covered transactions are limited to those less developed
currencies in which a transaction is executed with Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate acting as local subcustodian at the direction of the global
custodian because the global custodian either does not make a market in
such currency, or otherwise determines to execute with the local
subcustodian because of market conditions, market restrictions,
illiquidity of the currency or similar exigencies.
(d) Where a market is served by more than one subcustodian,
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate, as asset manager, has no decision
making authority or role, or otherwise makes no recommendations with
respect to the global custodian's selection of the subcustodian.
(e) The foreign exchange transaction is executed by Deutsche Bank
or its affiliate thereof acting as subcustodian at the direction of the
global custodian in the ordinary course of its business as global
custodian.
(f) The decision to select Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as the
subcustodian is made by an unrelated global custodian for the relevant
account.
(g) The selection of Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as subcustodian
and any foreign exchange transactions executed by Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate at the direction of the global custodian are not part of any
agreement, arrangement or understanding, written or otherwise, designed
to benefit Deutsche Bank, its affiliate or any other party in interest.
(h) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate, as asset manager, appoints an
independent fiduciary to receive, review and take appropriate action,
if any, with respect to the report required by Section II(l)(3) and the
notices in Section III(a) and (c) on behalf of (1) an in-house plan, or
(2) plans investing in a restricted pooled fund.
(i) The decision to select Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset
manager is part of an investment strategy that is adopted by an
independent fiduciary of a client plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account or the independent fiduciary of an unrelated
pooled fund.
(j) On an annual basis, determined as of December 31 of the
relevant year, the percentage of assets of in-house plans and pooled
funds in which client plans invest for which Deutsche Bank and/or its
affiliates select the global custodian represent less than 20 percent
of the total assets under custody by any such global custodian.
[[Page 8118]]
(k) Foreign affiliates of Deutsche Bank which engage in the covered
transactions--
(1) Agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States;
(2) Agree to appoint an agent for service of process in the United
States, which may be an affiliate (the Process Agent);
(3) Consent to service of process on the Process Agent;
(4) Agree that they may be sued in the United States Courts in
connection with the covered transactions described in this exemption;
(5) Agree that any judgment on behalf of a plan or pooled fund may
be collected in the United States from Deutsche Bank; and
(6) Agree to comply with, and be subject to, all relevant
provisions of the Act.
(l) With respect to the covered transactions--
(1) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset manager, designates an
individual (the responsible reviewing individual) who is responsible
for periodically (but no less frequently than on an annual basis)
reviewing a sample of such foreign exchange transactions to determine
whether the covered transactions have been executed in accordance with
the terms of this exemption. Such sample must include a sufficient
number of transactions to ensure that each affected currency is tested.
(2) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate provides the responsible
reviewing individual with the records (which may be provided
electronically) described in Section IV(a)(1)-(7), on an annual basis.
(3) The responsible reviewing individual notifies Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate as asset manager, the independent fiduciary of each
client plan whose assets are held in a separately managed account, the
independent fiduciary of an in-house plan and any restricted pooled
fund required under Section II(h), the independent fiduciary of an
unrelated pooled fund, and the independent fiduciary of each plan
investing in an unrestricted pooled fund, of its findings in a written
report within 90 days after the period to which the periodic review
relates. Such report describes the steps performed by such individual
during the course of the review, the level of compliance by Deutsche
Bank or its affiliate with the terms and conditions of the exemption,
and any specific instances of non-compliance by Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate with the terms and conditions of the exemption.
Section III. Notice Requirements
(a) At the time Deutsche Bank or its affiliate is retained as asset
manager, or prior to the initial investment of the plan's assets or
pooled fund's assets in any foreign investments that may require the
execution of a foreign exchange transaction by Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate as subcustodian, Deutsche Bank or its affiliate provides the
independent fiduciary of each client plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account, the independent fiduciary of each in-house
plan and restricted pooled fund as required under Section II(h), the
independent fiduciary of each unrelated pooled fund, and the
independent fiduciary of each plan investing in an unrestricted pooled
fund, a written notice (which may be effected electronically) that
includes the following:
(1) The reasons why Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset
manager, may consider a particular market to be an appropriate
investment for the plan or pooled fund.
(2) The factors considered by Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as
asset manager, in its selection of a global custodian (if applicable)
including: (i) The identity of the global custodian; and (ii) a summary
of the global custodian's policies and procedures regarding the
handling of foreign exchange transactions for plans or pooled funds
with respect to which Deutsche Bank or its affiliate is a fiduciary and
the factors that the global custodian considers in its selection of a
subcustodian.
(3) Notice that such foreign exchange transaction may be executed
by Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as subcustodian, at the direction of
a global custodian.
(4) A list of the markets in which plans or pooled funds may invest
where Deutsche Bank or its affiliate serves as a subcustodian, where a
foreign exchange transaction may be executed by Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate as subcustodian at the direction of a global custodian.
(5) A list of the markets where currency transactions are executed
by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, as subcustodian, to the extent known.
(6) Notice that Deutsche Bank or its affiliate maintains records
(described in Section IV), and that such records are reasonably
available at their customary location for examination in the U.S.,
during normal business hours, by the responsible reviewing individual,
the independent fiduciary of a client plan whose assets are held in a
separate account, the independent fiduciary of an in-house plan or a
restricted pooled fund, as required under Section II(h), the
independent fiduciary of an unrelated pooled fund, the independent
fiduciary of each plan investing in an unrestricted pooled fund, any
participant or beneficiary of such plan or pooled fund, or any duly
authorized employee or representative of such participant or
beneficiary.
(7) Copies of the notice of proposed exemption and the grant of
final exemption with respect to the subject transactions.
(8) Notice of the definition of the term ``independent'' under this
exemption as used in the term ``independent fiduciary,'' and a request
that the independent fiduciary of a client plan notify Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate asset manager if, at any time, such fiduciary is not
independent of Deutsche Bank.
(b) If the independent fiduciary fails to object in writing to
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate within 30 days following receipt of the
information described in Section III(a) by such fiduciary, then such
fiduciary's authorization of the arrangement contemplated under this
exemption shall be presumed.
(c) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset manager shall provide
notification of any changes to the information required by Section III,
including, but not limited to, the situation where Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate as asset manager, replaces the global custodian with another
independent entity or where there are changes in the markets in which
currency transactions are executed by the subcustodian. If the
independent fiduciary fails to object in writing to Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate as asset manager within 30 days following disclosure of
such changes, such fiduciary's approval of these changes shall be
presumed.
(d) With respect to pooled funds, in the event the independent
fiduciary of a client plan submits a notice in writing to the person
engaging in or proposing to engage in the covered transaction objecting
to the implementation of, a material change in or continuation of the
arrangement, the plan on whose behalf the objection was tendered is
given the opportunity to terminate its investment in the pooled fund
without penalty to the plan, within such time as may be necessary to
effect the withdrawal in an orderly manner that is equitable to all
withdrawing plans and to the non-withdrawing plans. In the case of a
plan that elects to so withdraw, the withdrawal shall be effected prior
to the implementation of a material change in the arrangement, but an
existing arrangement need not be discontinued
[[Page 8119]]
by reason of a plan electing to withdraw.
Section IV. Recordkeeping Requirements
(a) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate maintains, or causes to be
maintained, for a period of six years from the date of the covered
transactions, the following records, as well as any records necessary
to enable the persons described in paragraph (c) of this Section IV, to
determine whether the conditions of this exemption have been met:
(1) The account name,
(2) The foreign exchange transaction execution date,
(3) The exchange rate,
(4) The high and low on Reuters or similar independent service on
the date of the transaction,
(5) The identity of the foreign currency sold or purchased,
(6) The amount of foreign currency sold or purchased,
(7) The amount of U.S. dollars exchanged, where the exchange is
between foreign currencies and U.S. dollars or the amount of foreign
currency exchanged, where the exchange is between two foreign
currencies, and
(8) The annual report described in Section II(l).
(b) The following are exceptions to paragraph (a) of this Section
IV:
(1) If the records necessary to enable the persons described in
paragraph (c) to determine whether the conditions of the exemption have
been met are lost or destroyed, due to circumstances beyond the control
of Deutsche Bank, then no prohibited transaction will be considered to
have occurred solely on the basis of the unavailability of those
records; and
(2) No party in interest, other than Deutsche Bank, shall be
subject to the civil penalty that may be assessed under section 502(i)
of the Act or to the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the
Code if the records are not maintained or are not available for
examination as required by paragraph (c) below.
(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this Section IV
and notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of
section 504 of the Act, the records referred to above in paragraph (a)
of this Section IV are unconditionally available for examination during
normal business hours at their customary location to the following
persons or an authorized representative thereof:
(i) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department or the Internal Revenue Service;
(ii) The independent fiduciary of a client plan whose assets are
held in a separately managed account, the independent fiduciary of an
in-house plan or restricted pooled fund required under Section II(h),
the independent fiduciary of each unrelated pooled fund, or the
independent fiduciary of each plan investing in an unrestricted pooled
fund, or
(iii) Any participant or beneficiary of such plans or pooled funds
(described in paragraph (ii) above) or any duly authorized employee or
representative of such participant or beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described above in paragraphs (ii) and
(iii) of this paragraph (c)(1) of this Section IV shall be authorized
to examine trade secrets of Deutsche Bank, or any commercial or
financial information, which is privileged or confidential.
(3) Should Deutsche Bank refuse to disclose information on the
basis that such information is exempt from disclosure, Deutsche Bank
shall, by the close of the thirtieth (30th) day following the request,
provide written notice advising that the person of the reason for the
refusal and that the Department may request such information.
Section V. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption,
(a) The term ``Deutsche Bank'' means Deutsche Bank AG.
(b) An ``affiliate'' of Deutsche Bank means any domestic or foreign
bank or broker-dealer that is, directly or indirectly, through one or
more intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with Deutsche Bank;
(c) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual.
(d) The term ``bank'' means a bank as defined in section 202(a)(2)
of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the Investment Advisers Act),
or an institution that has substantially similar powers to a bank
defined in section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act, and is--
(1) Supervised by the United States or a State;
(2) Supervised and examined by the German banking authorities,
or monitored and controlled pursuant to the statutory and regulatory
standards of German law; or
(3) Subject to regulation and oversight by governmental entities
that are substantially similar to the regulatory oversight of banks
present in the United States.
(e) The term ``broker-dealer'' means a broker-dealer registered
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or is engaged in the
business of effecting transactions in securities for the account of
others, and is--
(1) Registered and regulated under the relevant securities laws of
the United States;
(2) Registered and regulated under the relevant securities laws of
Germany; or
(3) Registered and regulated under the relevant securities laws of
a country with securities laws that are substantially similar to the
securities laws governing broker-dealers in the United States.
(f) The term ``global custodian'' means a bank or broker-dealer
that is unrelated to Deutsche Bank or its affiliate, which is selected
by (1) The independent fiduciary of a client plan in the case of a
separately managed account; (2) the sponsor (other than Deutsche Bank
or its affiliate) of an unrelated pooled fund; (3) Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate as asset manager, in the case of an in-house plan; or (4)
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as asset manager in the case of a pooled
fund established by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, for the purpose of
holding and safeguarding the assets of the client plan, in-house plan,
or pooled fund, physically or through securities depositories, foreign
clearing agencies or other entities which act as securities
depositories, through its branches or through its subcustodian network.
For purposes of Section V(f) only, the global custodian will be
unrelated to Deutsche Bank or its affiliate if the global custodian is
not controlling, controlled by under common control with Deutsche Bank,
directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries.
(g) The term ``subcustodian'' means a bank or broker-dealer,
selected by a global custodian, to hold and safekeep designated assets
of the plan or pooled fund at securities depositories, foreign clearing
agencies or other entities which act as securities depositories, and at
the direction of the global custodian to execute foreign exchange
transactions and income item conversions. A subcustodian has no
contractual relationship with the global custodian's clients for
custodial or subcustodial services with respect to the assets involved
in the covered transactions, but the subcustodian's contractual
relationship with respect to subcustody is only with the global
custodian.
(h) The term ``responsible reviewing individual'' means a senior
official appointed by Deutsche Bank or its affiliate acting as asset
manager, who has at least 10 years experience with the fiduciary
responsibility provisions of
[[Page 8120]]
the Act, and appropriate compliance training. Such person is appointed
by Deutsche Bank or its affiliate to review a sample of the covered
transactions periodically, but no less frequently than on an annual
basis, in order to ensure compliance with the terms of the exemption on
behalf of a client plan whose assets are held in a separately managed
account, an in-house plan, or a pooled fund.
(i) The term ``in-house plan'' means an employee benefit plan as
described in section 3(3) of the Act, or a plan as described in section
4975(e)(1) of the Code, that is sponsored by Deutsche Bank or any
person that directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries,
controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with, Deutsche
Bank.
(j) The term ``client plan'' means an employee benefit plan, as
described in section 3(3) of the Act, or a plan, as described in
section 4975(e)(1) of the Code, other than an in-house plan, with
respect to which Deutsche Bank or its affiliate acts as a fiduciary
with discretionary authority over the management of the assets involved
in covered transactions (whether or not any such authority has been
delegated to an unaffiliated sub-adviser).
(k) The term ``pooled fund'' means a collective investment fund or
a pooled arrangement: (1) That is deemed to hold ``plan assets''
(within the meaning of section 3(42) of the Act and the regulations
thereunder), (2) that holds assets of at least two or more unrelated
employee benefit plans within the meaning of section 3(3) of the Act or
plans within the meaning of section 4975(e)(1) of the Code, and (3) for
which Deutsche Bank or its affiliate acts as fiduciary with
discretionary authority over the management of its assets (whether or
not any such authority has been delegated to an unaffiliated sub-
adviser).
(l) The term ``restricted pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund (1)
that is sponsored and managed by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, (2) in
which the total invested assets of an in-house plan (or in-house
plans), if aggregated (whether invested directly or indirectly through
another pooled fund), represent 20% or more (determined as of the last
day of each month) of the total invested assets of such pooled fund,
and (3) for which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate will appoint an
independent fiduciary, as described in Section V(o) below, to represent
the interests of all plans investing in such fund.
(m) The term ``unrestricted pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund
that (1) is sponsored and managed by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate and
(2) in which the total invested assets of an in-house plan (or in-house
plans), if aggregated (whether invested directly or indirectly through
another pooled fund), represent less than 20% (determined as of the
last day of each month) of the total invested assets of such pooled
fund.
(n) The term ``unrelated pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund that
is not sponsored by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, but is managed by
either of these entities.
(o) The term ``independent'' as used in the term ``independent
fiduciary'' means--
(1) In the case of a client plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account or an unrelated pooled fund, a plan
fiduciary or the named fiduciary of a pooled fund, or a fiduciary
appointed by the named fiduciary that is unrelated to, and independent
of, Deutsche Bank and it affiliates. For purposes of this exemption, a
plan fiduciary will be deemed to be unrelated to, and independent of,
Deutsche Bank if neither such fiduciary, nor any individual responsible
for the decision to authorize or terminate authorization for the
transactions described in Section I, is an officer, director, or highly
compensated employee (within the meaning of section 4975(e)(2)(H) of
the Code) of Deutsche Bank and such fiduciary represents that it will
advise Deutsche Bank or its affiliate if those facts change, or
(2) In the case of the fiduciary required under Section II(h), in
connection with an in-house plan or in connection with a restricted
pooled fund, an individual or company is qualified and independent of
Deutsche Bank and its affiliates if such individual or company: (i) Has
at least 10 years experience in the financial services business and
significant experience in foreign currency trading and pricing, and
(ii) certifies that the gross income received from Deutsche Bank and
its affiliates for the current year does not exceed 5% of such
fiduciary's gross income from all services for the prior fiscal year.
The independent fiduciary shall represent to Deutsche Bank that such
fiduciary is aware of its ERISA duties and responsibilities in acting
as a fiduciary with respect to an in-house plan or a restricted pooled
fund and the covered transactions.
(3) In the case of an unrestricted pooled fund, the persons
described in Section V(o)(1) or (2).
(4) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section V(o),
a plan fiduciary is not independent if--
(i) Such fiduciary directly or indirectly controls, is controlled
by, or is under common control with Deutsche Bank, other than described
herein;
(ii) Such fiduciary directly or indirectly receives any
compensation or other consideration from Deutsche Bank for his own
personal account in connection with any transaction described in this
exemption in excess of the 5% gross income limitation set forth in
Section V(o)(2)above;
(iii) Any officer, director or highly compensated employee (within
the meaning of section 4975(e)(2)(H) of the Code) of Deutsche Bank or
an affiliate responsible for the transactions described in Section I is
an officer, director or highly compensated employee (within the meaning
of section 4975(e)(2)(H) of the Code) of the client plan sponsor, the
sponsor of an unrelated pooled fund, or of the fiduciary responsible
for the decision to authorize or terminate authorization for
transactions described in Section I. However, if such individual is a
director of the client plan sponsor, the sponsor of an unrelated pooled
fund, or of the responsible fiduciary, and if he or she abstains from
participation in (A) the choice of Deutsche Bank or an affiliate as the
investment manager/adviser for the client plan or unrelated pooled fund
and (B) the decision to authorize or terminate authorization for
transactions described in Section I, then Section V(o)(4)(iii) shall
not apply.
(p) The term ``officer'' means a president, any vice president in
charge of a principal business unit, division or function (such as
sales, administration or finance), or any other officer who performs a
policy-making function for the entity.
(q) The term ``foreign exchange'' transaction means the exchange of
the currency of one nation for the currency of another nation.
(r) The term ``less developed currencies'' means those currencies
in which the global custodian does not make a market at the time of the
transaction and in which the global custodian determines to purchase
from or sell to the plan's or pooled fund's local subcustodian on
behalf of a plan or pooled fund because the currency is difficult to
trade, undeveloped or the subject of local government restrictions, or
because of the volatility or lack of liquidity in the market at the
time of the transaction. The term ``less developed currencies'' does
not include the following currencies: The Euro; the British pound; the
Swiss franc, the Canadian dollar; or the Japanese yen.
(s) The term ``trade-related currency conversion'' means the
conversion of trade-related items (i.e., amounts necessary for
purchases or proceeds
[[Page 8121]]
from sales) into foreign currency or into U.S. dollars in order to
permit purchase transactions to settle, and to permit proceeds of sales
to be deployed in other investments or to be used to make
distributions.
(t) The term ``income item conversions'' means the conversion of
income items (e.g., interest, dividends, tax reclaims or other
distributions) denominated in a foreign currency into U.S. dollars or
another foreign currency.
Effective Date: This exemption is effective as of July 8, 2008.
Written Comments
The proposed exemption gave interested persons an opportunity to
comment and to request a hearing. In this regard, all interested
persons were invited to submit written comments and/or requests for a
hearing on the pending exemption on or before August 22, 2008. During
the comment period, the Department received one written comment letter
and no requests for a public hearing. The comment was submitted by the
Applicant, and it is intended to clarify the operative language and the
Summary of Facts and Representations of the proposed exemption in a
number of areas or to confirm their validity. A discussion of the
comments and the responses made by the Department is presented below.
A. Clarifications to the Operative Language \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The clarifications discussed in this section are also meant
to include modifications to the Summary of Facts and Representations
of the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Large Pooled Fund and Small Pooled Fund/Word Substitutions.
Section II(h) of the proposed exemption states that Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate will appoint an independent fiduciary to represent the
interests of (a) an in-house plan or (b) plans investing in a ``large
pooled fund.'' The Applicant explains that the term ``large pooled
fund'' may be misleading since what is relevant is not the size of the
fund but the level of in-house plan investment in such fund. Therefore,
the Applicant requests that the Department change the term to
``restricted pooled fund.'' Similarly, the Applicant requests that the
Department revise the term ``small pooled fund'' to ``unrestricted
pooled fund.''
In response to this comment, the Department has substituted the
terms ``restricted pooled fund'' and ``unrestricted pooled fund'' for
the terms ``large pooled fund'' and ``small pooled fund'' in the final
exemption.
2. Investment Decisions by Independent Fiduciary or Applicant.
Section II(i) of the proposed exemption requires that the decision by
an independent fiduciary of a client plan, an in-house plan, a large
pooled fund (redesignated herein as a ``restricted pooled fund'') and
unrelated pooled funds to invest in a given market and to select
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate as asset manager is part of an investment
strategy that is adopted by such fiduciary. The Applicant requests that
the Department clarify that this condition requires nothing more than
the authorization specified in Section III(b) of the proposal. The
Applicant points out that in all instances, the decision to invest in a
given market is made by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, as asset
manager, and not by the independent fiduciary. While a plan's
independent fiduciary decides on a general investment strategy (e.g.,
emerging markets debt), the Applicant points out that such fiduciary
may or may not know the countries to which plan assets may be
committed. The Applicant also explains that the decision to commit plan
assets to a particular country and in what amounts are decisions made
by the discretionary investment manager, which is Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate. Further, in the context of an in-house plan or a restricted
pooled fund, the Applicant states that the decision to appoint Deutsche
Bank or an affiliate, as asset manager, is made by Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate, and not by an independent fiduciary.
In response to this comment, the Department has revised Section
II(i) of the final exemption to clarify that the decision to select
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate as asset manager is made by the
independent fiduciary of a client plan whose assets are held in a
separately managed account or the independent fiduciary of an unrelated
pooled fund.
3. Parties to Receive Notice from the Responsible Reviewing
Individual/Word Substitutions. Section II(l)(3) of the proposal
describes the parties that are to be notified by the responsible
reviewing individual as to its determination whether the covered
transactions have been executed in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the exemption. Among the persons who are designated in
the proposed exemption as recipients of periodic written reports from
the responsible reviewing individual are ``Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate, the independent fiduciary of a client plan whose assets are
held in a separately managed account, the independent fiduciary of an
in-house plan, the independent fiduciary of a large pooled fund, the
independent fiduciary of an unrelated pooled fund, or the receiving
fiduciary of a small pooled fund.'' The Applicant requests that Section
II(l)(3) of the proposed exemption be modified to reflect the
substitution of the term ``large'' with ``restricted'' and the term
``small'' with ``unrestricted,'' as appropriate, in the context of the
term ``pooled fund.'' The Applicant also asks that the term ``receiving
fiduciary'' for an unrestricted pooled fund, as defined in Section V(q)
of the proposal and as used in Section II(l)(3) be stricken because the
responsible reviewing individual will notify the independent fiduciary
of each plan investing in an unrestricted pooled fund directly.
In response to this comment, the Department has made the requested
modifications to Section II(l)(3), and deleted Section V(q) of the
proposal. The Department has also made corresponding revisions to
Section III(a) and Section IV(c)(1)(ii) where these terms appear, as
well.
4. Written Disclosures Provided to the Independent Fiduciary.
Section II(l)(3) of the proposal requires that the responsible
reviewing individual notify Deutsche Bank, the independent fiduciary of
each client plan whose assets are held in a separately managed account,
the independent fiduciary of an in-house plan and any restricted pooled
fund required under II(h), the independent fiduciary of unrelated
pooled fund, and the independent fiduciary of each plan investing in an
unrestricted pooled fund, of its findings in a written report within 90
days following the period to which the periodic review relates. Such
report is to be completed annually. The Applicant states in the
preamble to the proposed exemption (in the last paragraph of
Representation 30) that within 90 days of a request by the independent
fiduciary, Deutsche Bank must provide written compliance reports. The
Applicant notes that the operative language does not contain this
condition. The Applicant believes that such reports, would be
duplicative of those required by Section II(l) and be overly
burdensome. In response to this comment, the Department concurs with
the Applicant, and notes that the exemption does not require additional
reports other than those described in II(l)(3).
In addition, Section III(a)(4) of the proposed exemption states
that Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is required to provide written
disclosure to an independent fiduciary of the list of markets in which
plans or pooled funds invest where Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
serves as a subcustodian. Representation 30(e) of the Summary of Facts
and Representations adds that
[[Page 8122]]
disclosure must be provided as to whether a particular market is served
by more than one subcustodian. The Applicant requests confirmation that
this additional disclosure is not required because it will not have
access to this information.
The Department concurs with the Applicant's comment and clarifies
that disclosure of whether a particular market is served by more than
one subcustodian is not required.
5. Negative Consent by the Independent Fiduciary. As stated briefly
above, Section III(b) of the proposed exemption states that if the
independent fiduciary fails to object in writing to Deutsche Bank or
its affiliate within 30 days following the receipt of information
concerning the investment of a plan or a pooled fund assets in foreign
investments that may require the execution of foreign exchange
transactions by Deutsche Bank or its affiliates as subcustodians, then
such fiduciary's authorization of the contemplated arrangement will be
presumed. The Applicant suggests that at the end of Section III(b), in
order to clarify what happens if an independent fiduciary objects, the
following language should be inserted:
The independent fiduciary required under Section II(h) shall not
have any authority under this section. With respect to pooled funds,
in the event the independent fiduciary submits a notice in writing
to the person engaging in or proposing to engage in the covered
transaction objecting to the implementation of, material change in
or continuation of the arrangement, the plan on whose behalf the
objection was tendered is given the opportunity to terminate its
investment in the pooled fund, without penalty to the plan, within
such time as may be necessary to effect the withdrawal in an orderly
manner that is equitable to all withdrawing plans and to the non-
withdrawing plans. In the case of a plan that elects to so withdraw,
the withdrawal shall be affected prior to the implementation of a
material change in the arrangement, but an existing arrangement need
not be discontinued by reason of a plan electing to withdraw.
In response to this comment, the Department has determined to make
some of the changes requested by the Applicant by adding a new
condition designated as Section III(d). However, the Department has
determined not to adopt the exclusionary language appearing in the
first sentence of the above-referenced text, as suggested by the
Applicant, which pertains to the independent fiduciary required under
Section II(h) because of the independent fiduciary's critical role in
protecting an in-house plan or a restricted pooled fund by taking all
actions that are necessary and proper on behalf of such plan or pooled
fund. Section III(d) of the final exemption reads as follows:
With respect to pooled funds, in the event the independent
fiduciary of a client plan submits a notice in writing to the person
engaging in or proposing to engage in the covered transaction
objecting to the implementation of, a material change in or
continuation of the arrangement, the plan on whose behalf the
objection was tendered is given the opportunity to terminate its
investment in the pooled fund without penalty to the plan, within
such time as may be necessary to effect the withdrawal in an orderly
manner that is equitable to all withdrawing plans and to the non-
withdrawing plans. In the case of a plan that elects to so withdraw,
the withdrawal shall be effected prior to the implementation of a
material change in the arrangement, but an existing arrangement need
not be discontinued by reason of a plan electing to withdraw.
6. Access to Records by Participants and Beneficiaries. Section
IV(c)(1)(iii) of the proposed exemption permits any participant or
beneficiary of a plan or a pooled fund, the assets of which are
involved in foreign exchange transactions pursuant to the exemption to
have access to the records that the exemption, requires Deutsche Bank
to maintain. The Applicant has requested that the Department delete
Section IV(c)(1)(iii) and the reference to such subsection in Section
IV(c)(2) because the requirement is burdensome. The Department
continues to believe that the participants and beneficiaries in plans
or pooled funds should have access to the required records, and
accordingly, has decided not to make the requested changes.
7. Affiliate Definition. Section V(b) of the proposed exemption
defines the term ``affiliate'' of Deutsche Bank as ``any domestic or
foreign bank or broker-dealer directly or indirectly through one or
more intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with Deutsche Bank.'' The Applicant has requested that this
definition be expanded to include: ``any domestic or foreign investment
adviser that is, directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common control
with Deutsche Bank.'' According to the Applicant, this addition will
ensure that the exemption is available where an affiliate of Deutsche
Bank, which is a bank, broker-dealer or investment adviser, acts as
asset manager, rather than Deutsche Bank, itself.
The Department has determined not to make the Applicant's requested
change because it greatly expands the scope of the relief proposed
without an opportunity for notice and comment by interested persons.
8. Global Custodian Definition. Section V(f) of the proposed
exemption defines the term ``global custodian'' as follows:
The term ``global custodian'' means a bank or broker-dealer that
is unrelated to Deutsche Bank or its affiliate, which is selected by
(1) the named fiduciary of a client plan; (2) the sponsor (other
than Deutsche Bank or its affiliate) of an unrelated pooled fund;
(3) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate in the case of an in-house plan;
or (4) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate in the case of a pooled fund
established by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, for the purpose of
holding and safeguarding all assets of the client plan, in-house
plan, or pooled fund, physically or through a depository, through
its branches or through its subcustodian network.
For clarity, the Applicant requests that Section V(f)(1) of the
definition be modified by substituting the term ``named'' with the term
``independent'' because Deutsche Bank will not know whether the plan
fiduciary selecting the global custodian is actually a named fiduciary
because such plan fiduciary may be the trustee or some other fiduciary
to whom a named fiduciary has delegated appropriate authority. In
response to this comment, the Department has made the requested change.
In addition, the Applicant requests that, in the last clause of
Section V(f), the word ``all'' be deleted because some plans or funds
may have more than one global custodian. Further, the Applicant
suggests that the last clause of Section V(f) the phrase ``a
depository'' be substituted with the phrase ``securities depositories,
foreign clearing agencies or other entities which act as securities
depositories.'' According to the Applicant, this will ensure
consistency with Section V(g) of the exemption which utilizes the
latter language. The Department concurs with the Applicant's suggested
revisions and has made the changes in the final exemption.
In addition, at the Applicant's recommendation, the Department has
modified Section V(f) of the final exemption by clarifying that the
term ``unrelated,'' as used therein, means that ``the global custodian
will be unrelated to Deutsche Bank or its affiliates if the global
custodian is not controlling, controlled by or under common control
with Deutsche Bank, directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries.'' Thus, the revised definition of the term ``global
custodian'' is set forth as follows:
The term ``global custodian'' means a bank or broker-dealer that
is unrelated to Deutsche
[[Page 8123]]
Bank or its affiliate, which is selected by (1) the independent
fiduciary of a client plan in the case of a separately managed
account; (2) the sponsor (other than Deutsche Bank or its affiliate)
of an unrelated pooled fund; (3) Deutsche Bank or its affiliate as
asset manager in the case of an in-house plan; or (4) Deutsche Bank
or its affiliate as asset manager in the case of a pooled fund
established by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, for the purpose of
holding and safeguarding the assets of the client plan, in-house
plan, or pooled fund, physically or through securities depositories,
foreign clearing agencies or other entities which act as securities
depositories, through its branches or through its subcustodian
network. For purposes of Section V(f) only, the global custodian
will be unrelated to Deutsche Bank or its affiliates if the global
custodian is not controlling, controlled by or under common control
with Deutsche Bank, directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries.
9. In-House Plan Definition. Section V(i) of the proposed exemption
defines the term ``in-house plan'' as a ``plan sponsored by Deutsche
Bank or any person that directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common
control with, Deutsche Bank.'' The Applicant has requested that the
Department adopt the following language as the new definition of ``in-
house plan'' in order to maintain consistency with the Class Exemption
for Plan Asset Transactions Determined by In-House Asset Managers (PTE
96-23) (61 FR 15975, 15982 (April 10, 1996):
The term ``in-house plan'' means a plan sponsored by Deutsche
Bank or any affiliate. For purposes of the foregoing only,
``affiliate'' means a member of either (1) a controlled group of
corporations (as defined in section 414(b) of the Code) of which
Deutsche Bank is a member, or (2) a group of trades or businesses
under common control (as defined in section 414(c) of the Code) of
which Deutsche Bank is a member; provided that ``50 percent'' shall
be substituted for ``80 percent'' wherever ``80 percent'' appears in
section 414(b) or 414(c) or the rules thereunder.''
The Department notes that the Applicant's suggested definition of
``in-house plan,'' which is taken from PTE 96-23 would limit certain
plans from being considered ``in-house plans'' as these plans would not
come within the proposed definition. Therefore, the Department has not
adopted the requested change. Instead, the Department has modified the
definition of ``in-house plan'' as follows:
The term ``in-house plan'' means an employee benefit plan as
described in section 3(3) of the Act, or a plan as described in
section 4975(e)(1) of the Code, that is sponsored by Deutsche Bank
or any person that directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common
control with, Deutsche Bank.
10. Client Plan Definition. Section V(j) of the proposed exemption
defines the term ``client plan'' as ``an employee benefit plan, other
than a plan sponsored by Deutsche Bank, as described in section 3(3) of
the Act or section 4975(e)(1) of the Code with respect to which
Deutsche Bank or its affiliate acts as a fiduciary having full
investment discretion.'' The Applicant has requested that the
definition of ``client plan'' be modified as follows:
The term ``client plan'' means an employee benefit plan, as
described in section 3(3) of the Act, or a plan, as described in
section 4975(e)(1) of the Code, other than an in-house plan, with
respect to which Deutsche Bank or its affiliate acts as a fiduciary
with discretionary authority over the management of the assets
involved in covered transactions (whether or not any such authority
has been delegated to an unaffiliated sub-adviser).
The Applicant states that the revised definition clarifies Deutsche
Bank's role with respect to plan assets because the meaning of the
phrase ``full investment discretion,'' as used in the client plan
definition, is unclear. In addition, the Applicant states that the
modification ensures that separately managed accounts that are sub-
advised by a third party are included within the scope of exemptive
relief.
In response to this comment, the Department has made the
Applicant's requested revision in the final exemption.
11. Pooled Fund Definition. Section V(k) of the proposed exemption
defines the term ``pooled fund'' as follows:
The term ``pooled fund'' means a collective investment fund or a
pooled arrangement established for investment on behalf of two or
more unrelated employee benefit plans by Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate or by a fund sponsor other than Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate for which Deutsche Bank or its affiliate acts as fiduciary
with full investment discretion. The assets of a pooled fund may
include the assets of (i) client plans, (ii) in-house plans of
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, (iii) other pooled funds in which
Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is not the fund sponsor, and (iv)
other pooled funds in which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is the
fund sponsor.
The Applicant has suggested that this definition be deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following definition:
The term ``pooled fund'' means a collective investment fund or a
pooled arrangement--(1) that is deemed to hold ``plan assets''
(within the meaning of section 3(42) of Act and the regulations
thereunder), (2) that holds assets of at least two or more unrelated
employee benefit plans within the meaning of section 3(3) of Act or
plans within the meaning of section 4975(e)(1) of the Code, and (3)
for which Deutsche Bank or its affiliate acts as fiduciary with
discretionary authority over the management of its assets (whether
or not any such authority has been delegated to an unaffiliated sub-
adviser).
The Applicant believes that the requested change provides
clarification that the exemption applies to pooled funds only when they
are deemed to hold plan assets. Moreover, the Applicant states that the
revised definition acknowledges that non-plan investors may be invested
in pooled funds that hold plan assets. In response to this comment, the
Department has made the requested change.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For consistency in the formatting of the final exemption,
the Department has also replaced the romanettes with numbers for the
investment vehicles defined in Comments 11-13 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Large Pooled Fund Redefined/Word Substitution. Section V(l) of
the proposed exemption defines the term ``large pooled fund'' as
follows:
The term ``large pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund that is
sponsored and managed by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate. A large
pooled fund may include the assets of (i) client plans, (ii) in-
house plans of Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, (iii) other pooled
funds in which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is not the fund
sponsor, and (iv) other pooled funds in which Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate is the fund sponsor. In a large pooled fund, the total
invested assets of an in-house plan (or in-house plans), if
aggregated (whether invested directly or indirectly through another
pooled fund), represent more than 20% of the total invested assets
of such fund. Also, in a large pooled fund, Deutsche Bank will
appoint an independent fiduciary, as described in Section V(o)
below, to represent the interests of all plans investing in such
fund.
The Applicant has requested that the term ``large pooled fund'' be
changed to ``restricted pooled fund'' as it appears throughout the
proposed exemption and as defined in Section V(l). In the Applicant's
view, the modified language more accurately describes this term.
In response to this comment, the Department has replaced the term
``large pooled fund'' with ``restricted pooled fund'' throughout the
operative language of the final exemption. The Department also notes
the corresponding changes to the Summary of Facts and Representations.
In addition, the Applicant has requested that the definition of the
term ``large pooled fund'' be replaced with the following new
definition:
The term ``restricted pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund (i)
that is sponsored by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, (ii) in which
the total invested assets of an in-house plan (or in-house plans),
if aggregated (whether
[[Page 8124]]
invested directly or indirectly through another pooled fund),
represent 20% or more (determined as of the last day of each month)
of the total invested assets of such pooled fund, and (iii) for
which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate will appoint an independent
fiduciary, as described in Section V(o) below, to represent the
interests of all plans investing in such fund.
The Applicant states that the revised definition omits the
reference to Deutsche Bank's management because the revised definition
of ``pooled fund'' already references Deutsche Bank's management. In
addition, the Applicant explains that the revised definition
acknowledges that non-plan investors often invest in pooled funds that
hold plan assets and requires monthly testing of the level of in-house
plan investment.
The Department concurs, in part, with the Applicant's revised
definition of the term ``restricted pooled fund.'' However, the
Department has decided to leave the reference to Deutsche Bank's or its
affiliate's management authority intact in the final exemption in order
to emphasize that Deutsche Bank or its affiliate sponsors the
restricted pooled fund and has discretion over the assets of such
pooled fund. Therefore, the revised definition of the term restricted
pooled fund reads as follows:
The term ``restricted pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund (1)
that is sponsored and managed by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, (2)
in which the total invested assets of an in-house plan (or in-house
plans), if aggregated (whether invested directly or indirectly
through another pooled fund), represent 20% or more (determined as
of the last day of each month) of the total invested assets of such
pooled fund, and (3) for which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate will
appoint an independent fiduciary, as described in Section V(o)
below, to represent the interests of all plans investing in such
fund.
13. Small Pooled Fund Redefined/Word Substitution. Section V(m) of
the proposed exemption defines the term ``small pooled fund'' as
follows:
The term ``small pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund that is
sponsored and managed by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate. A small
pooled fund may include the assets of (i) client plans, (ii) in-
house plans of Deutsche Bank or an affiliate, (iii) other pooled
funds in which Deutsche Bank or an affiliate is not the fund
sponsor, and (iv) other pooled funds in which Deutsche Bank or an
affiliate is the fund sponsor. In a small pooled fund, the total
invested assets of an in-house plan (or in-house plans), if
aggregated (whether invested directly or through another pooled
fund), represent less than 20% of the total invested assets of such
fund.
The Applicant has requested that the term ``small pooled fund'' be
changed to ``unrestricted pooled fund.'' Also, for the same reasons
expressed above by the Applicant for modifying the term ``large pooled
fund,'' the Applicant requests that Section V(m) be revised to the
following:
The term ``unrestricted pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund
that (1) is sponsored by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate and (2) in
which the total invested assets of an in-house plan (or in-house
plans), if aggregated (whether invested directly or indirectly
through another pooled fund), represent less than 20% (determined as
of the last day of each month) of the total invested assets of such
pooled fund.
The Department concurs with the Applicant's revised definition of
the term ``unrestricted pooled fund,'' with the exception of deleting
the reference to Deutsche Bank or its affiliate managing the fund, and
has made appropriate changes in the final exemption. The revised
definition reads as follows:
The term ``unrestricted pooled fund'' refers to a pooled fund
that (1) is sponsored and managed by Deutsche Bank or an affiliate
and (2) in which the total invested assets of an in-house plan (or
in-house plans), if aggregated (whether invested directly or
indirectly through another pooled fund), represent less than 20%
(determined as of the last day of each month) of the total invested
assets of such pooled fund.
B. Confirmations
1. Fee Disclosures. The Applicant points out that in the proposed
exemption, Representation 30(c) of the Summary of Facts and
Representations provides for the disclosure of all fees Deutsche Bank
or its affiliate may receive as a result of the covered transactions.
However, the Applicant notes that there is no such requirement in the
operative language of the proposal. The Applicant explains that the
proposed exemption only requires that Deutsche Bank or its affiliate
retain records that specify the price at which the transaction
occurred, which is acceptable to the Applicant. Therefore, the
Applicant requests that the final exemption reflect that the disclosure
of ``all fees'' should not be required, but that the rate and other
market information should be required.
The Department does not concur with the Applicant's reasoning. To
the extent Deutsche Bank or its affiliate are able to make appropriate
fee disclosures to independent fiduciaries without undue burden, the
Department would require Deutsche Bank or its affiliate to provide this
information.
2. Exemptive Relief for the Global Custodian. The Applicant has
asked the Department to confirm that no exemptive relief is necessary
if the global custodian makes a market in a particular currency and
executes the foreign exchange transaction as principal. The Applicant
explains that although a global custodian would be engaged in a
principal transaction, it might receive a ticket charge, as it would
for any transaction. However, the Applicant believes that it is very
unlikely that the global custodian would receive a ticket charge given
that the plan would be engaging in a foreign exchange transaction
through the global custodian's custody network. The Applicant also
emphasizes that because it is unaware of the policies of each global
custodian, it can only make generalized assertions about such policies.
In response to this comment, the Department believes that this
comment is beyond the scope of the exemption. The Department notes that
exemptive relief may be available for the global custodian under
section 408(b)(18) of the Act to the extent the conditions therein are
satisfied.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 408(b)(18) of the Act is a statutory exemption that
was enacted under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. This statutory
exemption provides relief from section 406(a) of the Act and limited
relief from section 406(b) of the Act for custodians or trustees
with respect to foreign exchange transactions between a bank or
broker-dealer (or an affiliate of either) and a plan with respect to
which such bank or broker-dealer (or affiliate) is a trustee,
custodian, fiduciary or other party in interest if,--(1) the
transaction is in connection with the purchase, holding or sale of
securities or other investment assets (other than a foreign exchange
transaction unrelated to any other investment in securities or other
investment assets); (2) at the time the foreign exchange transaction
is entered into, the terms of the transaction are not less favorable
to the plan than the terms generally available in comparable arm's
length foreign exchange transactions between unrelated parties, or
the terms afforded by the bank or broker-dealer (or an affiliate of
either) in comparable arm's-length foreign exchange transactions
involving unrelated parties; (3) the exchange rate used by such bank
or broker-dealer (or affiliate) for a particular foreign exchange
transaction does not deviate by more than 3 percent from the
interbank bid and asked rates for transactions of comparable size
and maturity at the time of the transaction as displayed on an
independent service that reports rates of exchange in the foreign
currency market for such currency; and (4) the bank or broker-dealer
(or any affiliate of either) does not have investment discretion or
provide investment advice with respect to the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Application of Foreign Laws. The Applicant has requested the
Department to confirm that Section II(k) does not preclude the
application of foreign laws. Section II(k) of the exemption requires
that:
Foreign affiliates of Deutsche Bank which engage in the covered
transactions--
(1) Agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States;
(2) Agree to appoint an agent for service of process in the
United States, which may be an affiliate (the Process Agent);
(3) Consent to service of process on the Process Agent;
[[Page 8125]]
(4) Agree that they may be sued in the United
States Courts in connection with the covered transactions
described in this proposed exemption;
(5) Agree that any judgment on behalf of a plan or pooled fund
may be collected in the United States from Deutsche Bank; and
(6) Agree to comply with, and be subject to, all relevant
provisions of the Act.
In response, the Department notes that this section does not
preclude the application of foreign laws, but rather provides a means
for a plan to seek a judgment in the courts of the United States if a
claim arises in connection with the covered transactions. In addition,
to the extent those foreign laws preclude a foreign affiliate of
Deutsche Bank from meeting the conditions of the exemption, such
affiliate may not rely on the relief provided by this exemption.
4. Development of Policies and Procedures by Global Custodian. The
Applicant requests that the Department confirm that Section III(a) does
not require the global custodian to develop any special policies and
procedures regarding the handling of foreign exchange transactions for
plans or pooled funds with respect to which Deutsche Bank or its
affiliate is a fiduciary or disclose to Deutsche Bank the factors that
the global custodian considers in its selection of a subcustodian.
In response to this comment, the Department notes that the
requirements of Section III(a) relate exclusively to the information
that Deutsche Bank must provide to certain designated persons.
For a complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the notice of proposed exemption that was published in the Federal
Register on July 8, 2008 at 73 FR 39158. For further information
regar