Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 7600-7604 [2010-3326]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7600
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices
Health and Science, Office of the
Secretary, Department of Health and
Human Services.
ACTION:
Notice of meeting.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 217a, Section 222 of
the Public Health Service Act, as amended.
The Committee is governed by the provision
of Public Law 92–463, as amended (5 U.S.C.
Appendix 2), which sets forth standards for
the formation and use of advisory
committees.
The U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS)
announces the next Federal advisory
committee meeting regarding the
national health promotion and disease
prevention objectives for 2020. This
meeting will be open to the public and
will be held online via WebEx software.
The Secretary’s Advisory Committee on
National Health Promotion and Disease
Prevention Objectives for 2020 will
address efforts to develop the nation’s
health promotion and disease
prevention objectives and strategies to
improve the health status and reduce
health risks for Americans by the year
2020. The Committee will provide to the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
advice and consultation for developing
and implementing the next iteration of
national health promotion and disease
prevention goals and objectives and
provide recommendations for initiatives
to occur during the initial
implementation phase of the goals and
objectives. The meeting’s agenda will
include the Committee’s review of the
work and recommendations of its
subcommittees on Priorities, Social
Determinants of Health,
Implementation, Evidence-based
Resources, Strategic Health
Communication, and Data and Health
Information Technology. HHS will use
the recommendations to inform the
development of the national health
promotion and disease prevention
objectives for 2020 and the process for
implementing the objectives. The intent
is to develop and launch objectives
designed to improve the health status
and reduce health risks for Americans
by the year 2020.
SUMMARY:
The Committee will meet on
April 1, 2010 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET).
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
The meeting will be held
online, via WebEx software. For detailed
instructions about how to make sure
that your windows computer and
browser is set up for WebEx, please visit
the ‘‘Secretary’s Advisory Committee’’
Web page of the Healthy People Web
site at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/
hp2020/advisory/default.asp.
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:26 Feb 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emmeline Ochiai, Designated Federal
Officer, Secretary’s Advisory Committee
on National Health Promotion and
Disease Prevention Objectives for 2020,
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of Public Health and
Science, Office of Disease Prevention
and Health Promotion, 1101 Wootton
Parkway, Room LL–100, Rockville, MD
20852, (240) 453–8259 (telephone),
(240) 453–8281 (fax). Additional
information is available on the Internet
at https://www.healthypeople.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Meeting: Every 10 years,
through the Healthy People initiative,
HHS leverages scientific insights and
lessons from the past decade, along with
the new knowledge of current data,
trends, and innovations to develop the
next iteration of national health
promotion and disease prevention
objectives. Healthy People provides
science-based, 10-year national
objectives for promoting health and
preventing disease. Since 1979, Healthy
People has set and monitored national
health objectives to meet a broad range
of health needs, encourage
collaborations across sectors, guide
individuals toward making informed
health decisions, and measure the
impact of our prevention and health
promotion activities. Healthy People
2020 will reflect assessments of major
risks to health and wellness, changing
public health priorities, and emerging
issues related to our nation’s health
preparedness and prevention.
Public Participation at Meeting:
Members of the public are invited to
listen to the online Committee meeting.
There will be no opportunity for oral
public comments during the online
Committee meeting. Written comments,
however, are welcome throughout the
development process of the national
health promotion and disease
prevention objectives for 2020. They can
be submitted through the Healthy
People Web site at: https://
www.healthypeople.gov/hp2020/
comments/ or they can be e-mailed to
HP2020@hhs.gov.
To listen to the Committee meeting,
individuals must pre-register to attend
at the Healthy People Web site located
at https://www.healthypeople.gov.
Participation in the meeting is limited.
Registrations will be accepted until
maximum WebEx capacity is reached
and must be completed by 9 a.m. ET on
April 1, 2010. A waiting list will be
maintained should registrations exceed
WebEx capacity. Individuals on the
waiting list will be contacted as
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
additional space for the meeting
becomes available.
Registration questions may be
directed to Hilary Scherer at
HP2020@norc.org (e-mail), (301) 634–
9374 (phone) or (301) 634–9301 (fax).
Dated: February 16, 2010.
Penelope Slade-Sawyer,
RADM, USPHS, Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Health, Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion.
[FR Doc. 2010–3309 Filed 2–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–32–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Cross-Site Evaluation
of the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial
Suicide Prevention and Early
Intervention Programs (OMB No. 0930–
0286)—Revision
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration’s
(SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health
Services (CMHS) will continue to
conduct the cross-site evaluation of the
Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Youth
Suicide Prevention and Early
Intervention State/Tribal Programs and
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices
the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Youth
Suicide Prevention Campus Programs.
The data collected through the cross-site
evaluation addresses four stages of
program activity: (1) The context stage
includes a review of program plans,
such as grantee’s target population,
target region, service delivery
mechanisms, service delivery setting,
types of program activities to be funded
and evaluation activities; (2) the product
stage describes the prevention strategies
that are developed and utilized by
grantees; (3) the process stage assesses
progress on key activities and
milestones related to implementation of
program plans; and (4) the impact stage
assesses the impact of the program on
early identification, referral for services
and service follow up of youth at risk.
Additionally, to obtain a
comprehensive understanding of the
integration of community-based
behavioral health services with services
provided by college or university
campuses, SAMHSA will conduct case
studies of four exemplary Campus
suicide prevention programs. Currently,
case studies of two campus grantees are
underway. The goal of the Campus Case
Studies is to understand how a public
health approach is successfully applied
as a model for campus suicide
prevention efforts, and will explore, in
a systematic manner: The suicide
prevention related infrastructures and
supports (e.g., clinical and non-clinical)
that exist on selected GLS-funded
campuses; the various student-level
factors that are related to suicide
prevention efforts (e.g., protective
factors, coping strategies, social norms,
and facilitators and barriers to student
access and receipt of behavioral
healthcare); campus interdepartmental
collaboration and the relationship
between various efforts to promote
student mental health and wellness; and
the extent to which the campus
infrastructures and supports promote
and address these factors.
To date, 86 State/Tribal grants and 93
Campus grants have participated in the
cross-site evaluation, since FY2007.
Currently, 48 State/Tribal grants and 38
Campus grants are participating in the
cross-site evaluation. Data will continue
to be collected from suicide prevention
program staff (e.g., project directors,
evaluators), key program stakeholders
(e.g., state/local officials, child-serving
agency directors, gatekeepers, mental
health providers, and campus
administrators), training participants,
college students, and campus faculty/
staff through FY2012.
Since the State/Tribal grantees differ
from the campus grantees in
programmatic approaches, specific data
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:26 Feb 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
collection activities also vary by type of
program. The following describes the
specific data collection activities and
data collection instruments to be used
across State/Tribal and Campus grantees
for the cross-site evaluation and the
specific data collection instruments to
be used by selected Campus grantees for
the Campus Case Studies. While most of
the data collection instruments
described below are revised versions of
instruments that have previously
received OMB approval (OMB No.
0930–0286 with Expiration Date: May
2010) and are currently in use, the
Training Utilization and Preservation—
Survey (TUP–S) for State/Tribal
grantees and the Training Exit Survey
for Campus grantees (TES–C) are
proposed as new instruments. The
addition of these two new data
collection activities, the inclusion of the
Campus Case studies, and the revised
estimate for number trained per site has
increased the burden associated with
the cross-site evaluation. A summary
table of number of respondents and
respondent burden has also been
included.
Data Collection Activities for State/
Tribal Grantees
For State/Tribal grantees, the
Prevention Strategies Inventory State/
Tribal (PSI–ST), Training Exit Survey
State/Tribal (TES–ST), Referral Network
Survey (RNS) and Training Utilization
and Preservation—Interview (TUP–I)
described below are revised versions of
instruments that previously received
OMB approval (OMB No. 0930–0286
with Expiration Date: May 2010) and are
currently in use. The Training Exit
Survey—Cover Page State/Tribal (TES–
CP–ST), Early Identification, Referral
and Follow up Aggregate Screening
Form (EIRF–S) and the Early
Identification, Referral and Follow up
Analysis (EIRF) are data abstraction
activities utilizing existing data sources.
The Training Utilization and
Preservation—Survey (TUP–S) is
proposed as a new data collection
instrument.
• Prevention Strategies InventoryState/Tribal (PSI–ST)—Revised. The
Prevention Strategies Inventory will
collect information on the suicide
prevention strategies that grantees have
developed and utilized. Prevention
strategies include outreach and
awareness, gatekeeper training,
assessment and referral training for
mental health professionals and hotline
staff, lifeskills development programs,
screening programs, hotlines and
helplines, means restriction, policies
and protocols for intervention and
postvention, coalitions and
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7601
partnerships, and direct services and
traditional healing practices. Baseline
data will be collected from the State/
Tribal grantees at the beginning of their
grant cycle. Thereafter, they will
complete the PSI–ST on a quarterly
basis over the duration of their grant
period. Baseline data will be collected
on information on the types of
prevention strategies grantees have
developed and utilized, and the followup data collection asks the grantees to
update the information they have
provided on a quarterly basis over the
period of the grant. On average, 48
State/Tribal grantees will fill out the
PSI–ST per year. One respondent from
each site will be responsible for
completing the survey. The survey will
take approximately 45 minutes;
however, the number of products,
services and activities implemented
under each strategy will determine the
number of items each respondent will
complete. The PSI–ST primarily has
multiple choice questions with several
open-ended questions.
• Training Exit Survey State-Tribal
Version (TES–ST)—Revised. The TES–
ST will be administered to all
participants in suicide prevention
training activities immediately
following their training experience in
order to assess the content of the
training, the participants’ intended use
of the skills and knowledge learned and
satisfaction with the training
experience. The survey will also contain
modules with questions tailored to
specific types of training. It is estimated
that approximately 94,848 trainees per
year will respond to the TES–ST. The
questions on the TES–ST are multiplechoice, Likert-scale, and open-ended.
The survey includes about 33 items and
will take approximately 10 minutes to
complete.
• Training Exit Survey Cover Page
State/Tribal Version (TES–CP–ST)—
Revised. State and Tribal grantees are
required to report aggregate training
participant information for all training
conducted as part of their suicide
prevention programs. These data are
aggregated from existing data sources,
some of which are attendance sheets,
management information systems, etc.
Grantees are responsible for aggregating
these data and submitting to the crosssite evaluation team using the TES–CP–
ST on a quarterly basis. It is estimated
that abstracting this information will
take 25 minutes.
• Training Utilization and
Preservation Survey (TUP–S)—New.
The Training Utilization and
Preservation Survey (TUP–S) is a
quantitative, computer-assisted
telephone interview that will be
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
7602
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices
administered to a random sample of
trainees two months following the
training. The TUP–S will assess trainee
knowledge retention and gatekeeper
behavior, particularly behavior related
to identifying youth at risk. The
TUP–S will ask trainees to provide
demographic information about
individuals they have identified at risk,
information about the subsequent
referrals or supports provided by the
trainee, and any available information
about services accessed by the at-risk
individual. An average of 2,000
participants per year will be sampled.
The TUP–S includes 26 items and will
take approximately 15 minutes to
complete.
• Training Utilization and
Preservation Key Informant Interview
(TUP–I)—Revised. The TUP–I is a
qualitative follow-up interview that is
targeted towards locally developed and
understudied standardized training
curricula as well as towards particular
understudied gatekeeper trainee
populations. The TUP–I will be
administered to respondents two
months following the training
experience to assess whether the suicide
prevention knowledge, skills or
techniques learned through training
were utilized and had an impact on
youth. On average, the TUP–I will be
administered to 100 respondents per
year. The interviews are semistructured
and open ended. The TUP–I includes 22
items and will take approximately 40
minutes to complete.
• Referral Network Survey (RNS)—
Revised. The Referral Network Survey
(RNS) will be administered to
representatives of youth-serving
organizations or agencies that form
referral networks supporting youth
identified at risk. The RNS examines
how collaboration and integration are
used for sharing and transferring
knowledge, resources, and technology
among State/Tribal Program agencies
and organizational stakeholders, how
these networks influence referral
mechanisms and service availability,
policies and protocols regarding followup for youths who have attempted
suicide and who are at risk for suicide,
and access to electronic databases. Most
State/Tribal grantees will select a single
referral network for this survey, the
average size of the network is 11
agencies/organizations and there will be
2 respondents per agency. The RNS will
be administered to referral networks on
an annual basis over the period of the
grant. On average, 1,056 respondents
per year will complete the RNS.
Questions on the RNS are multiplechoice, Likert-scale, and open-ended.
The RNS includes 28 items and will
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:26 Feb 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
take approximately 40 minutes to
complete.
• Early Identification, Referral and
Follow up Aggregate Screening Form
(EIRF–S)—State/Tribal grantees are also
required to report aggregate screening
information for all youth screened as
part of their suicide prevention
programs. These data are aggregated
from existing data sources. Grantees are
responsible for aggregating these data
and submitting to the cross-site
evaluation team using the Early
Identification, Referral and Follow up
Aggregate Screening Form. Grantees are
required to submit information on a
quarterly basis, and it is estimated that
abstracting this information will take 20
minutes.
• Early Identification, Referral and
Follow Up Analyses (EIRF)—State/
Tribal grantees are required to share
existing data with the cross-site
evaluation team on the youth identified
at risk as a result of early identification
activities, the types of services these
youth are referred for, and whether
these youth receive services within 3
months of the referral. Grantees are
required to submit information on a
quarterly basis, and it is estimated that
abstracting this information will take 60
minutes.
Data Collection Activities for Campuses
For Campus grantees, the Prevention
Strategies Inventory-Campus Baseline
and Follow Up (PSI–C), Suicide
Prevention Exposure, Awareness and
Knowledge Survey—Student Version
(SPEAKS–S), Suicide Prevention
Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge
Survey—Faculty/StaffVersion
(SPEAKS–FS) and Campus
Infrastructure Interviews (CIFI) are
revised versions of instruments that
previously received OMB approval
(OMB No. 0930–0286 with Expiration
Date: May 2010) and are currently in
use. The Training Exit Survey—Cover
Page Campus (TES–CP–C) and MIS data
abstraction are data abstraction
activities utilizing existing data sources.
The Training Exit Survey—Campus
(TES–C) is proposed as a new data
collection instrument.
• Prevention Strategies InventoryCampus (PSI–C)—Revision. The
Prevention Strategies Inventory will
collect information on the suicide
prevention strategies that grantees have
developed and utilized. Prevention
strategies include outreach and
awareness, gatekeeper training,
assessment and referral training for
mental health professionals and hotline
staff, lifeskills development activities,
screening programs, hotlines and
helplines, means restriction, policies
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and protocols for intervention and
postvention, and coalitions and
partnerships. The Campus grantees will
first complete collect baseline data.
Thereafter, they will collect follow-up
data on a quarterly basis over the
duration of their grant period. Baseline
data will be collected on information on
the types of prevention strategies
grantees have developed and utilized,
and the follow-up data collection asks
the grantees to update the information
they have provided on a quarterly basis
over the period of the grant. On average,
38 Campus grantees will fill out the
PSI–C per year. One respondent from
each site will be responsible for
completing the survey. The survey will
take approximately 45 minutes.
However, the number of products,
services and activities implemented
under each strategy will determine the
number of items to complete. The
survey primarily has multiple choice
questions with several open-ended
questions.
• Training Exit Survey Campus
Version (TES–C)—New. The TES–C will
be administered to all participants in
suicide prevention training activities
immediately following their training
experience in order to assess the content
of the training, the participants’
intended use of the skills and
knowledge learned, and satisfaction
with the training experience. The survey
will also contain modules with
questions tailored to specific types of
training. It is estimated that
approximately 23,712 trainees per year
will respond to the Training Exit
Survey. The questions on the TES–C are
multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and openended. The survey includes about 33
items and will take approximately 10
minutes to complete.
• Training Exit Survey Cover Page
Campus Version (TES–CP–C)—
Revision. State and Tribal grantees are
required to report aggregate training
participant information for all training
conducted as part of their suicide
prevention programs. These data are
aggregated from existing data sources,
some of which are attendance sheets,
management information systems, etc.
Grantees are responsible for aggregating
these data and submitting to the crosssite evaluation team using the TES–CP–
C data elements. Grantees are
responsible for aggregating these data
and submitting to the cross-site
evaluation team using the TES–CP–C on
a quarterly basis. It is estimated that
abstracting this information will take 20
minutes.
• Suicide Prevention Exposure,
Awareness and Knowledge Survey—
Student Version (SPEAKS–S)—
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices
Revision. This survey will examine: The
exposure of campus populations to
suicide prevention initiatives;
awareness of appropriate crisis
interventions, supports, services, and
resources for mental health seeking;
knowledge of myths and facts related to
suicide and suicide prevention;
perceived and personal stigma related to
depression and mental health seeking;
and behaviors related to seeking help
and referring for mental health services.
This survey will be administered
annually over the grant period. It is
estimated that 7,600 students per year
will respond to the SPEAKS–S. The
SPEAKS–S is web-based and includes
multiple-choice, Likert-scale and true/
false questions. The SPEAKS–Student
Version includes 85 items and will take
approximately 25 minutes to complete.
• Suicide Prevention Exposure,
Awareness and Knowledge Survey—
(SPEAKS–FS)—Revision. The SPEAKS–
FS assesses the exposure, awareness and
knowledge of suicide prevention
activities among faculty/staff on campus
as a result of the suicide prevention
program. Questions include whether
faculty/staff have been exposed to
suicide prevention materials, their
agreement with myths and facts about
suicide, and the availability of resources
to provide assistance to those at risk for
suicide. This survey will be
administered annually over the grant
period. It is estimated that 1,900 faculty/
staff per year will respond to the
SPEAKS FS. The SPEAKS–FS is webbased and includes multiple-choice,
Likert-scale and true/false questions.
The survey includes 54 items and will
take approximately 15 minutes to
complete.
• Campus Infrastructure Interviews
(CIFI)—Revision. CIFI is designed to
gather information around campus
infrastructure, program, policy, and
planning related to suicide prevention;
it involves key informant interviews
conducted by the cross-site evaluation
team via teleconference for each campus
twice during the life of the grant. These
semistructured interviews are
conducted with up to five site
representatives to gather information
from multiple and varied perspectives
on campus-based infrastructure
development around suicide prevention
activities. These representatives
include: (1) Administrator, (2) Student
Leader, (3) Counseling Center Staff, (4)
Faculty/Staff-human services
department, and (5) Faculty/Staff-nonhuman service department. Questions
on the Campus Infrastructure Interview
include whether respondents are aware
of suicide prevention activities, what
the campus culture is related to suicide
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:26 Feb 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
prevention, and what specific efforts are
in place to prevent suicide among the
campus population. Questions will
include close-ended background
questions, with the remaining questions
being open-ended and semi-structured.
It is estimated that on average 64
respondents per year will respond to
CIFI. The Campus Infrastructure
Interviews include 29 items and will
take approximately 60 minutes to
complete.
• MIS Data Abstraction: For the crosssite evaluation of the Campus programs,
existing program data related to student
retention rate, student use of mental
health services and student use of
emergency services will be requested
from Campuses once a year. It is
estimated that abstracting this
information will take 60 minutes.
Data Collection Activities for Campus
Case Studies
For Campus Case Studies, the
instruments described below are
currently used by 2 Campus grantees.
These instruments are proposed for 4
additional Campus grantees. The
Campus Case Studies will take place
over the period of the grant.
• Student Focus Group Moderator’s
Guide. This component will assess
student risk and protective factors
related to mental health, help-seeking
behaviors, and knowledge of prevention
activities on campus and their perceived
effectiveness. This will help researchers
more fully understand student-level
factors in relation to population-level
factors addressed by the SPEAKS–S.
Questions address stressors that
different groups of students face while
in college, barriers to seeking help,
attitudes and stigma related to seeking
help, and the accessibility of the
campus counseling center. Six focus
groups will be conducted on each
campus once over the data collection
period. The following groups of
students will potentially be represented
in the focus groups, as decided by the
campus: (1) First-year students, (2)
athletes, (3) international students, (4)
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
(LGBT) students, (5) Greek life students,
(6) graduate students, and (7) residential
advisors/peer educators. Recruitment
will be conducted by campus project
staff. Focus groups will include a
maximum of 9 students. It is estimated
that on average 216 students will
participate in focus groups. Groups will
last approximately 90 minutes.
• Faculty/Staff Focus Group
Moderator’s Guide. The faculty and staff
focus groups will assess the campus’
approach to prevention, attitudes and
stigma around student mental health
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7603
and wellness on campus, campus
infrastructure supports for students who
need mental health help, and the
general campus climate around mental
health and wellness. Faculty and staff
will also describe their knowledge of
prevention activities on campus and
their perceived effectiveness of these
efforts. Local campus staff will recruit
appropriate respondents for the faculty
and staff focus groups to include a
maximum of 9 respondents per group.
Two faculty focus groups and one staff
focus group will be conducted on each
campus once over the period of data
collection. It is estimated that 108
faculty/staff will participate in focus
groups. The groups will last
approximately 90 minutes.
• Case Study Key Informant
Interviews (7 versions). The Case Study
Key Informant Interviews (CSIs) include
7 qualitative interview versions: (1)
Administrator, (2) Counseling Staff, (3)
Coalition Member—Faculty, (4)
Prevention Staff, (5) Case Finder, (6)
Campus Police, and (7) Student Leader.
Local project staff will be responsible
for identifying appropriate respondents
for each CSI version and scheduling the
interview to occur during site visits by
the case study team. Seven individuals
from each of the campus sites will be
selected as key informants to participate
in the CSIs in each of the two stages of
the GLS Campus Case Studies.
Questions on the CSIs include whether
respondents are aware of suicide
prevention activities, what the campus
culture is related to suicide prevention,
and what specific efforts are in place to
prevent suicide among the campus
population. Items are formatted as openended and semi-structured questions.
The CSIs include 16 to 21 items and
will take approximately 60 minutes to
complete. On the second site visit, the
case study team will incorporate
preliminary findings from the case
studies in the interviews, which may be
modified to some extent to collect more
comprehensive information and gather
feedback from local key informants
surrounding the context of the
preliminary findings. It is estimated that
the CSI will be administered to 56
respondents. The CSIs for the second
site visit will last 60 minutes.
Internet-based technology will
continue to be used for collecting data
via Web-based surveys, and for data
entry and management. The average
annual respondent burden is estimated
below. The estimate reflects the average
annual number of respondents, the
average annual number of responses, the
time it will take for each response, and
the average annual burden. While the
different cohorts of grantees finish their
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
7604
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices
grants at different times, we have
assumed that new cohorts will replace
previous cohorts. Therefore, the number
of grantees in each year is assumed to
be constant.
TABLE—ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Measure name
Number of
responses/
respondent
Hours/
response
Response
burden
(in hours)
State/Tribal Cross-Site Evaluation Instruments
Prevention Strategies Inventory—State Tribal (PSI–ST) ..............................
Training Exit Survey State/Tribal (TES–ST) ..................................................
Training Utilization and Penetration Survey (TUP–S) ...................................
Training Utilization and Penetration Interview (TUP–I) .................................
Referral Network Survey (RNS) ....................................................................
Early Identification, Referral and Follow Up Analysis (EIRF) ........................
Early Identification, Referral and Follow Up Aggregate Screening Form
(EIRF–S) ....................................................................................................
Training Exit Survey Cover Page State/Tribal (TES–CP–ST) ......................
48
94,848
2,000
100
1,024
48
4
1
1
1
1
4
0.75
0.17
0.25
0.67
0.67
1
144
16,125
500
67
687
192
48
48
4
4
0.33
0.33
64
64
38
23,712
4
1
0.75
0.17
114
4,032
7,600
1
0.42
3,192
1,900
38
76
38
38
38
38
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
0.25
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.33
0.33
475
29
57
29
29
51
51
1.5
1.5
1.5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
324
108
54
8
4
8
8
8
12
8
Campus Cross-Site Evaluation Instruments
Prevention Strategies Inventory—Campus (PSI–C) ......................................
Training Exit Survey Campus (TES–C) .........................................................
Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge Survey—Student Version (SPEAKS–S) .........................................................................
Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge Survey—Faculty/Staff (SPEAKS–FS) .............................................................................
Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for Student ......................................
Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for Faculty .......................................
Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for Administrator ..............................
Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for Counselor ..................................
Training Exit Survey Cover Page Campus (TES–CP–C) .............................
MIS Data Abstraction .....................................................................................
Campus Case Studies Evaluation Instruments
Focus Group—Student Version .....................................................................
Focus Group—Faculty Version .....................................................................
Focus Group—Staff Version ..........................................................................
Interview—Student Leader Version ...............................................................
Interview—Case Finder Version ....................................................................
Interview—Faculty Version ............................................................................
Interview—Campus Police Version ...............................................................
Interview—Counseling Staff Version .............................................................
Interview—Prevention Staff Version ..............................................................
Interview—Administrator Version ..................................................................
216
72
36
8
4
8
8
8
12
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Total ........................................................................................................
........................
132,060
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 7–1044, One Choke Cherry Road,
Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail a copy
to summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: February 5, 2010.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–3326 Filed 2–19–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0079]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Experimental
Study of Graphic Cigarette Warning
Labels
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:26 Feb 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
..........................
26,444
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the Experimental Study of Graphic
Cigarette Warning Labels that is being
conducted in support of the graphic
label statement provision of the Family
Smoking Prevention and Tobacco
Control Act (the Tobacco Control Act).
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by April 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 34 (Monday, February 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7600-7604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3326]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Cross-Site Evaluation of the Garrett Lee Smith
Memorial Suicide Prevention and Early Intervention Programs (OMB No.
0930-0286)--Revision
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's
(SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) will continue to
conduct the cross-site evaluation of the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial
Youth Suicide Prevention and Early Intervention State/Tribal Programs
and
[[Page 7601]]
the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Youth Suicide Prevention Campus
Programs. The data collected through the cross-site evaluation
addresses four stages of program activity: (1) The context stage
includes a review of program plans, such as grantee's target
population, target region, service delivery mechanisms, service
delivery setting, types of program activities to be funded and
evaluation activities; (2) the product stage describes the prevention
strategies that are developed and utilized by grantees; (3) the process
stage assesses progress on key activities and milestones related to
implementation of program plans; and (4) the impact stage assesses the
impact of the program on early identification, referral for services
and service follow up of youth at risk.
Additionally, to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the
integration of community-based behavioral health services with services
provided by college or university campuses, SAMHSA will conduct case
studies of four exemplary Campus suicide prevention programs.
Currently, case studies of two campus grantees are underway. The goal
of the Campus Case Studies is to understand how a public health
approach is successfully applied as a model for campus suicide
prevention efforts, and will explore, in a systematic manner: The
suicide prevention related infrastructures and supports (e.g., clinical
and non-clinical) that exist on selected GLS-funded campuses; the
various student-level factors that are related to suicide prevention
efforts (e.g., protective factors, coping strategies, social norms, and
facilitators and barriers to student access and receipt of behavioral
healthcare); campus interdepartmental collaboration and the
relationship between various efforts to promote student mental health
and wellness; and the extent to which the campus infrastructures and
supports promote and address these factors.
To date, 86 State/Tribal grants and 93 Campus grants have
participated in the cross-site evaluation, since FY2007. Currently, 48
State/Tribal grants and 38 Campus grants are participating in the
cross-site evaluation. Data will continue to be collected from suicide
prevention program staff (e.g., project directors, evaluators), key
program stakeholders (e.g., state/local officials, child-serving agency
directors, gatekeepers, mental health providers, and campus
administrators), training participants, college students, and campus
faculty/staff through FY2012.
Since the State/Tribal grantees differ from the campus grantees in
programmatic approaches, specific data collection activities also vary
by type of program. The following describes the specific data
collection activities and data collection instruments to be used across
State/Tribal and Campus grantees for the cross-site evaluation and the
specific data collection instruments to be used by selected Campus
grantees for the Campus Case Studies. While most of the data collection
instruments described below are revised versions of instruments that
have previously received OMB approval (OMB No. 0930-0286 with
Expiration Date: May 2010) and are currently in use, the Training
Utilization and Preservation--Survey (TUP-S) for State/Tribal grantees
and the Training Exit Survey for Campus grantees (TES-C) are proposed
as new instruments. The addition of these two new data collection
activities, the inclusion of the Campus Case studies, and the revised
estimate for number trained per site has increased the burden
associated with the cross-site evaluation. A summary table of number of
respondents and respondent burden has also been included.
Data Collection Activities for State/Tribal Grantees
For State/Tribal grantees, the Prevention Strategies Inventory
State/Tribal (PSI-ST), Training Exit Survey State/Tribal (TES-ST),
Referral Network Survey (RNS) and Training Utilization and
Preservation--Interview (TUP-I) described below are revised versions of
instruments that previously received OMB approval (OMB No. 0930-0286
with Expiration Date: May 2010) and are currently in use. The Training
Exit Survey--Cover Page State/Tribal (TES-CP-ST), Early Identification,
Referral and Follow up Aggregate Screening Form (EIRF-S) and the Early
Identification, Referral and Follow up Analysis (EIRF) are data
abstraction activities utilizing existing data sources. The Training
Utilization and Preservation--Survey (TUP-S) is proposed as a new data
collection instrument.
Prevention Strategies Inventory-State/Tribal (PSI-ST)--
Revised. The Prevention Strategies Inventory will collect information
on the suicide prevention strategies that grantees have developed and
utilized. Prevention strategies include outreach and awareness,
gatekeeper training, assessment and referral training for mental health
professionals and hotline staff, lifeskills development programs,
screening programs, hotlines and helplines, means restriction, policies
and protocols for intervention and postvention, coalitions and
partnerships, and direct services and traditional healing practices.
Baseline data will be collected from the State/Tribal grantees at the
beginning of their grant cycle. Thereafter, they will complete the PSI-
ST on a quarterly basis over the duration of their grant period.
Baseline data will be collected on information on the types of
prevention strategies grantees have developed and utilized, and the
follow-up data collection asks the grantees to update the information
they have provided on a quarterly basis over the period of the grant.
On average, 48 State/Tribal grantees will fill out the PSI-ST per year.
One respondent from each site will be responsible for completing the
survey. The survey will take approximately 45 minutes; however, the
number of products, services and activities implemented under each
strategy will determine the number of items each respondent will
complete. The PSI-ST primarily has multiple choice questions with
several open-ended questions.
Training Exit Survey State-Tribal Version (TES-ST)--
Revised. The TES-ST will be administered to all participants in suicide
prevention training activities immediately following their training
experience in order to assess the content of the training, the
participants' intended use of the skills and knowledge learned and
satisfaction with the training experience. The survey will also contain
modules with questions tailored to specific types of training. It is
estimated that approximately 94,848 trainees per year will respond to
the TES-ST. The questions on the TES-ST are multiple-choice, Likert-
scale, and open-ended. The survey includes about 33 items and will take
approximately 10 minutes to complete.
Training Exit Survey Cover Page State/Tribal Version (TES-
CP-ST)--Revised. State and Tribal grantees are required to report
aggregate training participant information for all training conducted
as part of their suicide prevention programs. These data are aggregated
from existing data sources, some of which are attendance sheets,
management information systems, etc. Grantees are responsible for
aggregating these data and submitting to the cross-site evaluation team
using the TES-CP-ST on a quarterly basis. It is estimated that
abstracting this information will take 25 minutes.
Training Utilization and Preservation Survey (TUP-S)--New.
The Training Utilization and Preservation Survey (TUP-S) is a
quantitative, computer-assisted telephone interview that will be
[[Page 7602]]
administered to a random sample of trainees two months following the
training. The TUP-S will assess trainee knowledge retention and
gatekeeper behavior, particularly behavior related to identifying youth
at risk. The TUP-S will ask trainees to provide demographic information
about individuals they have identified at risk, information about the
subsequent referrals or supports provided by the trainee, and any
available information about services accessed by the at-risk
individual. An average of 2,000 participants per year will be sampled.
The TUP-S includes 26 items and will take approximately 15 minutes to
complete.
Training Utilization and Preservation Key Informant
Interview (TUP-I)--Revised. The TUP-I is a qualitative follow-up
interview that is targeted towards locally developed and understudied
standardized training curricula as well as towards particular
understudied gatekeeper trainee populations. The TUP-I will be
administered to respondents two months following the training
experience to assess whether the suicide prevention knowledge, skills
or techniques learned through training were utilized and had an impact
on youth. On average, the TUP-I will be administered to 100 respondents
per year. The interviews are semistructured and open ended. The TUP-I
includes 22 items and will take approximately 40 minutes to complete.
Referral Network Survey (RNS)--Revised. The Referral
Network Survey (RNS) will be administered to representatives of youth-
serving organizations or agencies that form referral networks
supporting youth identified at risk. The RNS examines how collaboration
and integration are used for sharing and transferring knowledge,
resources, and technology among State/Tribal Program agencies and
organizational stakeholders, how these networks influence referral
mechanisms and service availability, policies and protocols regarding
follow-up for youths who have attempted suicide and who are at risk for
suicide, and access to electronic databases. Most State/Tribal grantees
will select a single referral network for this survey, the average size
of the network is 11 agencies/organizations and there will be 2
respondents per agency. The RNS will be administered to referral
networks on an annual basis over the period of the grant. On average,
1,056 respondents per year will complete the RNS. Questions on the RNS
are multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended. The RNS includes 28
items and will take approximately 40 minutes to complete.
Early Identification, Referral and Follow up Aggregate
Screening Form (EIRF-S)--State/Tribal grantees are also required to
report aggregate screening information for all youth screened as part
of their suicide prevention programs. These data are aggregated from
existing data sources. Grantees are responsible for aggregating these
data and submitting to the cross-site evaluation team using the Early
Identification, Referral and Follow up Aggregate Screening Form.
Grantees are required to submit information on a quarterly basis, and
it is estimated that abstracting this information will take 20 minutes.
Early Identification, Referral and Follow Up Analyses
(EIRF)--State/Tribal grantees are required to share existing data with
the cross-site evaluation team on the youth identified at risk as a
result of early identification activities, the types of services these
youth are referred for, and whether these youth receive services within
3 months of the referral. Grantees are required to submit information
on a quarterly basis, and it is estimated that abstracting this
information will take 60 minutes.
Data Collection Activities for Campuses
For Campus grantees, the Prevention Strategies Inventory-Campus
Baseline and Follow Up (PSI-C), Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness
and Knowledge Survey--Student Version (SPEAKS-S), Suicide Prevention
Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge Survey--Faculty/StaffVersion (SPEAKS-
FS) and Campus Infrastructure Interviews (CIFI) are revised versions of
instruments that previously received OMB approval (OMB No. 0930-0286
with Expiration Date: May 2010) and are currently in use. The Training
Exit Survey--Cover Page Campus (TES-CP-C) and MIS data abstraction are
data abstraction activities utilizing existing data sources. The
Training Exit Survey--Campus (TES-C) is proposed as a new data
collection instrument.
Prevention Strategies Inventory-Campus (PSI-C)--Revision.
The Prevention Strategies Inventory will collect information on the
suicide prevention strategies that grantees have developed and
utilized. Prevention strategies include outreach and awareness,
gatekeeper training, assessment and referral training for mental health
professionals and hotline staff, lifeskills development activities,
screening programs, hotlines and helplines, means restriction, policies
and protocols for intervention and postvention, and coalitions and
partnerships. The Campus grantees will first complete collect baseline
data. Thereafter, they will collect follow-up data on a quarterly basis
over the duration of their grant period. Baseline data will be
collected on information on the types of prevention strategies grantees
have developed and utilized, and the follow-up data collection asks the
grantees to update the information they have provided on a quarterly
basis over the period of the grant. On average, 38 Campus grantees will
fill out the PSI-C per year. One respondent from each site will be
responsible for completing the survey. The survey will take
approximately 45 minutes. However, the number of products, services and
activities implemented under each strategy will determine the number of
items to complete. The survey primarily has multiple choice questions
with several open-ended questions.
Training Exit Survey Campus Version (TES-C)--New. The TES-
C will be administered to all participants in suicide prevention
training activities immediately following their training experience in
order to assess the content of the training, the participants' intended
use of the skills and knowledge learned, and satisfaction with the
training experience. The survey will also contain modules with
questions tailored to specific types of training. It is estimated that
approximately 23,712 trainees per year will respond to the Training
Exit Survey. The questions on the TES-C are multiple-choice, Likert-
scale, and open-ended. The survey includes about 33 items and will take
approximately 10 minutes to complete.
Training Exit Survey Cover Page Campus Version (TES-CP-
C)--Revision. State and Tribal grantees are required to report
aggregate training participant information for all training conducted
as part of their suicide prevention programs. These data are aggregated
from existing data sources, some of which are attendance sheets,
management information systems, etc. Grantees are responsible for
aggregating these data and submitting to the cross-site evaluation team
using the TES-CP-C data elements. Grantees are responsible for
aggregating these data and submitting to the cross-site evaluation team
using the TES-CP-C on a quarterly basis. It is estimated that
abstracting this information will take 20 minutes.
Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge
Survey--Student Version (SPEAKS-S)--
[[Page 7603]]
Revision. This survey will examine: The exposure of campus populations
to suicide prevention initiatives; awareness of appropriate crisis
interventions, supports, services, and resources for mental health
seeking; knowledge of myths and facts related to suicide and suicide
prevention; perceived and personal stigma related to depression and
mental health seeking; and behaviors related to seeking help and
referring for mental health services. This survey will be administered
annually over the grant period. It is estimated that 7,600 students per
year will respond to the SPEAKS-S. The SPEAKS-S is web-based and
includes multiple-choice, Likert-scale and true/false questions. The
SPEAKS-Student Version includes 85 items and will take approximately 25
minutes to complete.
Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge
Survey--(SPEAKS-FS)--Revision. The SPEAKS-FS assesses the exposure,
awareness and knowledge of suicide prevention activities among faculty/
staff on campus as a result of the suicide prevention program.
Questions include whether faculty/staff have been exposed to suicide
prevention materials, their agreement with myths and facts about
suicide, and the availability of resources to provide assistance to
those at risk for suicide. This survey will be administered annually
over the grant period. It is estimated that 1,900 faculty/staff per
year will respond to the SPEAKS FS. The SPEAKS-FS is web-based and
includes multiple-choice, Likert-scale and true/false questions. The
survey includes 54 items and will take approximately 15 minutes to
complete.
Campus Infrastructure Interviews (CIFI)--Revision. CIFI is
designed to gather information around campus infrastructure, program,
policy, and planning related to suicide prevention; it involves key
informant interviews conducted by the cross-site evaluation team via
teleconference for each campus twice during the life of the grant.
These semistructured interviews are conducted with up to five site
representatives to gather information from multiple and varied
perspectives on campus-based infrastructure development around suicide
prevention activities. These representatives include: (1)
Administrator, (2) Student Leader, (3) Counseling Center Staff, (4)
Faculty/Staff-human services department, and (5) Faculty/Staff-non-
human service department. Questions on the Campus Infrastructure
Interview include whether respondents are aware of suicide prevention
activities, what the campus culture is related to suicide prevention,
and what specific efforts are in place to prevent suicide among the
campus population. Questions will include close-ended background
questions, with the remaining questions being open-ended and semi-
structured. It is estimated that on average 64 respondents per year
will respond to CIFI. The Campus Infrastructure Interviews include 29
items and will take approximately 60 minutes to complete.
MIS Data Abstraction: For the cross-site evaluation of the
Campus programs, existing program data related to student retention
rate, student use of mental health services and student use of
emergency services will be requested from Campuses once a year. It is
estimated that abstracting this information will take 60 minutes.
Data Collection Activities for Campus Case Studies
For Campus Case Studies, the instruments described below are
currently used by 2 Campus grantees. These instruments are proposed for
4 additional Campus grantees. The Campus Case Studies will take place
over the period of the grant.
Student Focus Group Moderator's Guide. This component will
assess student risk and protective factors related to mental health,
help-seeking behaviors, and knowledge of prevention activities on
campus and their perceived effectiveness. This will help researchers
more fully understand student-level factors in relation to population-
level factors addressed by the SPEAKS-S. Questions address stressors
that different groups of students face while in college, barriers to
seeking help, attitudes and stigma related to seeking help, and the
accessibility of the campus counseling center. Six focus groups will be
conducted on each campus once over the data collection period. The
following groups of students will potentially be represented in the
focus groups, as decided by the campus: (1) First-year students, (2)
athletes, (3) international students, (4) Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and
Transgender (LGBT) students, (5) Greek life students, (6) graduate
students, and (7) residential advisors/peer educators. Recruitment will
be conducted by campus project staff. Focus groups will include a
maximum of 9 students. It is estimated that on average 216 students
will participate in focus groups. Groups will last approximately 90
minutes.
Faculty/Staff Focus Group Moderator's Guide. The faculty
and staff focus groups will assess the campus' approach to prevention,
attitudes and stigma around student mental health and wellness on
campus, campus infrastructure supports for students who need mental
health help, and the general campus climate around mental health and
wellness. Faculty and staff will also describe their knowledge of
prevention activities on campus and their perceived effectiveness of
these efforts. Local campus staff will recruit appropriate respondents
for the faculty and staff focus groups to include a maximum of 9
respondents per group. Two faculty focus groups and one staff focus
group will be conducted on each campus once over the period of data
collection. It is estimated that 108 faculty/staff will participate in
focus groups. The groups will last approximately 90 minutes.
Case Study Key Informant Interviews (7 versions). The Case
Study Key Informant Interviews (CSIs) include 7 qualitative interview
versions: (1) Administrator, (2) Counseling Staff, (3) Coalition
Member--Faculty, (4) Prevention Staff, (5) Case Finder, (6) Campus
Police, and (7) Student Leader. Local project staff will be responsible
for identifying appropriate respondents for each CSI version and
scheduling the interview to occur during site visits by the case study
team. Seven individuals from each of the campus sites will be selected
as key informants to participate in the CSIs in each of the two stages
of the GLS Campus Case Studies. Questions on the CSIs include whether
respondents are aware of suicide prevention activities, what the campus
culture is related to suicide prevention, and what specific efforts are
in place to prevent suicide among the campus population. Items are
formatted as open-ended and semi-structured questions. The CSIs include
16 to 21 items and will take approximately 60 minutes to complete. On
the second site visit, the case study team will incorporate preliminary
findings from the case studies in the interviews, which may be modified
to some extent to collect more comprehensive information and gather
feedback from local key informants surrounding the context of the
preliminary findings. It is estimated that the CSI will be administered
to 56 respondents. The CSIs for the second site visit will last 60
minutes.
Internet-based technology will continue to be used for collecting
data via Web-based surveys, and for data entry and management. The
average annual respondent burden is estimated below. The estimate
reflects the average annual number of respondents, the average annual
number of responses, the time it will take for each response, and the
average annual burden. While the different cohorts of grantees finish
their
[[Page 7604]]
grants at different times, we have assumed that new cohorts will
replace previous cohorts. Therefore, the number of grantees in each
year is assumed to be constant.
Table--Estimates of Annualized Hour Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Response
Measure name Number of responses/ Hours/ burden (in
respondents respondent response hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Tribal Cross-Site Evaluation Instruments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prevention Strategies Inventory--State Tribal 48 4 0.75 144
(PSI-ST).......................................
Training Exit Survey State/Tribal (TES-ST)...... 94,848 1 0.17 16,125
Training Utilization and Penetration Survey (TUP- 2,000 1 0.25 500
S).............................................
Training Utilization and Penetration Interview 100 1 0.67 67
(TUP-I)........................................
Referral Network Survey (RNS)................... 1,024 1 0.67 687
Early Identification, Referral and Follow Up 48 4 1 192
Analysis (EIRF)................................
Early Identification, Referral and Follow Up 48 4 0.33 64
Aggregate Screening Form (EIRF-S)..............
Training Exit Survey Cover Page State/Tribal 48 4 0.33 64
(TES-CP-ST)....................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Campus Cross-Site Evaluation Instruments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prevention Strategies Inventory--Campus (PSI-C). 38 4 0.75 114
Training Exit Survey Campus (TES-C)............. 23,712 1 0.17 4,032
Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness and 7,600 1 0.42 3,192
Knowledge Survey--Student Version (SPEAKS-S)...
Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness and 1,900 1 0.25 475
Knowledge Survey--Faculty/Staff (SPEAKS-FS)....
Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for 38 1 0.75 29
Student........................................
Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for 76 1 0.75 57
Faculty........................................
Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for 38 1 0.75 29
Administrator..................................
Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for 38 1 0.75 29
Counselor......................................
Training Exit Survey Cover Page Campus (TES-CP- 38 4 0.33 51
C).............................................
MIS Data Abstraction............................ 38 4 0.33 51
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Campus Case Studies Evaluation Instruments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Focus Group--Student Version.................... 216 1 1.5 324
Focus Group--Faculty Version.................... 72 1 1.5 108
Focus Group--Staff Version...................... 36 1 1.5 54
Interview--Student Leader Version............... 8 1 1 8
Interview--Case Finder Version.................. 4 1 1 4
Interview--Faculty Version...................... 8 1 1 8
Interview--Campus Police Version................ 8 1 1 8
Interview--Counseling Staff Version............. 8 1 1 8
Interview--Prevention Staff Version............. 12 1 1 12
Interview--Administrator Version................ 8 1 1 8
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. 132,060 .............. 26,444
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 7-1044, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail a
copy to summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Dated: February 5, 2010.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-3326 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
