In the Matter of: Certain Liquid Crystal Display Modules and Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Making the Same; Notice of Investigation, 6705-6706 [2010-2874]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on December 18, 2008, based on a
complaint filed by Eastman Kodak
Company (‘‘Kodak’’) of Rochester, New
York. 73 FR 77061 (Dec. 18, 2008). The
complainant named the following
respondents: Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,
Samsung Telecommunications America,
LLC (collectively ‘‘Samsung’’), LG
Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA,
Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm
USA, Inc. (collectively ‘‘LG’’). The
complaint, as amended, alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation, sale for importation, and
sale within the United States after
importation of certain mobile
telephones and wireless communication
devices featuring digital cameras and
components thereof that infringe certain
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,493,335
(‘‘the ’335 patent’’) and 6,292,218 (‘‘the
’218 patent’’).
On December 16, 2009, Kodak and LG
filed a joint motion before the
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) to
terminate the investigation with respect
to the LG respondents on the basis of a
settlement agreement. The ALJ granted
this motion on January 14, 2010. The
Commission determined not to review
the initial determination (‘‘ID’’). On
December 17, 2009 the ALJ issued his
final ID, finding that the Samsung
respondents’ accused products infringe
the asserted claims of both the ’335
patent and the ’218 patent, that the
asserted claims are not invalid, and that
the ’218 patent is not unenforceable due
to inequitable conduct. The Commission
has stayed the deadline for filing any
petitions for review of the final ID.
On January 8, 2010, Kodak and
Samsung (‘‘the parties’’) filed their joint
motion to terminate the investigation
with respect to the Samsung
respondents on the basis of a settlement
agreement. On January 20, 2010, the IA
filed a response supporting the parties’
joint motion. Having examined the
record of this investigation, the
Commission has determined to grant
Kodak and Samsung’s joint motion and
terminate this investigation.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.21 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.21).
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
By order of the Commission.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:21 Feb 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
Issued: February 2, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–2893 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–702]
In the Matter of: Certain Liquid Crystal
Display Modules and Products
Containing the Same, and Methods for
Making the Same; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
January 8, 2010, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Sharp
Corporation of Japan. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain liquid crystal
display modules and products
containing the same, and methods for
making the same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 7,379,140; 6,141,075;
7,283,192; 5,670,994; and 7,408,588.
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6705
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2574.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
February 3, 2010, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of liquid crystal display
modules or products containing the
same, or methods for making the same
that infringe one or more of claims 1–
3 of U.S. Patent No. 7,379,140; claims
22, 23, 28–31, and 36–38 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,141,075; claims 1 and 11 of U.S.
Patent No. 7,283,192; claims 5, 6, 12, 13,
and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 5,670,994; and
claims 1, 3, 5, 29, and 32 of U.S. Patent
No. 7,408,588, and whether an industry
in the United States exists as required
by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Sharp Corporation, 22–22 Nagaike-cho,
Abeno-ku, Osaka 545–8522, Japan.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 416
maetan-dong, Youngtong-gu, Suwon,
Kyunggi-Do, Korea 443–742.
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105
Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ
07660.
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., 3655
North First Street, San Jose, CA
95134.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
6706
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 3, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–2874 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–693]
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
In the Matter of Certain Foldable
Stools; Notice of Commission Decision
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainant’s Motion To
Amend the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:21 Feb 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
(Order No. 4) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting complainant’s motion to amend
the complaint and notice of
investigation in the above-captioned
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on December 9, 2009, based on a
complaint filed by B & R Plastics, Inc.
(‘‘B & R’’) of Denver, Colorado. 74 FR
65155–6. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
**1337, in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain foldable
stools by reason of infringement of U.S.
Patent No. D460,566. The complaint
further alleges the existence of a
domestic industry. The Commission’s
notice of investigation named several
respondents including the following:
abc Distributing Inc. (‘‘abc Distributing’’)
of Bannockburn, Illinois; Crate & Barrel,
Inc. (‘‘Crate & Barrel’’) of Northbrook,
Illinois; and Home Depot Inc. (‘‘Home
Depot’’) of Atlanta, Georgia.
On January 5, 2010, B & R filed an
unopposed motion to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to
substitute proposed respondent Home
Depot U.S.A. Inc. for named respondent
Home Depot, and to correct the
corporate names of respondents abc
Distributing and Crate & Barrel with
‘‘LTD Commodities, LLC, d/b/a abc
Distributing’’ and ‘‘Euromarket Designs,
Inc., d/b/a Crate & Barrel,’’ respectively.
On January 19, 2010, the ALJ issued
the subject ID granting B & R’s motion
to amend the complaint and notice of
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
investigation. No party petitioned for
review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR
210.43(a). The Commission has
determined not to review this ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in
sections 210.14 and 210.42(h) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.42(h).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 4, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–2894 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–0004]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested
ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Interstate
Firearms Shipment Report of Theft/
Loss.
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives (ATF), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until April 12, 2010. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Ben Hayes, ATF National
Tracing Center, 244 Needy Road,
Martinsburg, WV 25401.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6705-6706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2874]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-702]
In the Matter of: Certain Liquid Crystal Display Modules and
Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Making the Same; Notice
of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 8, 2010, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Sharp Corporation of Japan. The complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain liquid crystal display modules and products containing the
same, and methods for making the same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,379,140; 6,141,075; 7,283,192;
5,670,994; and 7,408,588. The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202) 205-2574.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19
CFR 210.10 (2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on February 3, 2010, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of liquid crystal
display modules or products containing the same, or methods for making
the same that infringe one or more of claims 1-3 of U.S. Patent No.
7,379,140; claims 22, 23, 28-31, and 36-38 of U.S. Patent No.
6,141,075; claims 1 and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 7,283,192; claims 5, 6,
12, 13, and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 5,670,994; and claims 1, 3, 5, 29,
and 32 of U.S. Patent No. 7,408,588, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Sharp Corporation, 22-22 Nagaike-cho, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8522, Japan.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 416 maetan-dong, Youngtong-gu, Suwon,
Kyunggi-Do, Korea 443-742.
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105 Challenger Road, Ridgefield
Park, NJ 07660.
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., 3655 North First Street, San Jose, CA
95134.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International
[[Page 6706]]
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 3, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-2874 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P