Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Professional Orders, 5360-5362 [2010-2092]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
5360
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 2, 2010 / Notices
periodic reports since the period ended
May 3, 1997.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Lew Corp.
(n/k/a Questus Global Limited) because
it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended December 31,
2001.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Library
Bureau, Inc. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since July 2, 1994.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Life
Sciences, Inc. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended May 31, 2000.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Lifesmart
Nutrition Technologies, Inc. because it
has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended February 28, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Lightning
Rod Software, Inc. because it has not
filed any periodic reports since the
period ended December 31, 2001.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Lindatech,
Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended March
31, 1999.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Littlefield,
Adams & Company because it has not
filed any periodic reports since the
period ended March 31, 2000.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Liuski
International. Inc. because it has not
filed any periodic reports since the
period ended July 20, 1999.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
companies.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies
is suspended for the period from 9:30
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:52 Feb 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
a.m. EST on January 29, 2010, through
11:59 p.m. EST on February 11, 2010.
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2010–2223 Filed 1–29–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–61426; File No. SR–Phlx–
2010–05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Professional Orders
January 26, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on January
12, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
priority rules to give certain non-brokerdealer orders the same priority as
broker-dealer orders.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://
nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/
NASDAQOMXPHLX/Filings/, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to adopt the new term
‘‘professional’’ for purposes of the
Exchange’s priority rules. Currently,
pursuant to Rule 1014(g), a customer
account is an account other than a
controlled account; a controlled account
is an account controlled by or under
common control with a broker-dealer.
Rule 1014(g) governs, among other
things, the allocation of orders and,
thus, the priority over and parity among
orders and quotations.
Customer priority is one of the
marketplace advantages provided to
customer orders on the Exchange;
customer priority means that customer
orders are given execution priority over
non-customer orders and quotations of
specialists and Registered Options
Traders (‘‘ROTs’’) at the same price.
Another marketplace advantage afforded
to customer orders on the Exchange is
that member organizations are generally
not charged transaction fees for the
execution of customer orders. The
purpose of these marketplace
advantages is to attract retail order flow
to the Exchange by leveling the playing
field for retail investors over market
professionals.3
With respect to these Phlx
marketplace advantages, the Exchange
does not believe that the current
definition of customer account versus
controlled account properly
distinguishes between non-professional
retail investors and certain
professionals. According to the
Exchange, providing marketplace
advantages based upon whether the
order is for the account of a participant
that is a registered broker-dealer is no
longer appropriate in today’s
marketplace, because some non-brokerdealer individuals and entities have
access to information and technology
that enables them to professionally trade
listed options in the same manner as a
broker or dealer in securities.4 These
3 Market professionals have access to
sophisticated trading systems that contain
functionality not available to retail customers,
including things such as continuously updated
pricing models based upon real-time streaming
data, access to multiple markets simultaneously and
order and risk management tools.
4 For example, some broker-dealers provided their
professional customers with multi-screened trading
stations equipped with trading technology that
allows the trader to monitor and place orders on all
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 2, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
individual traders and entities
(collectively, ‘‘professionals’’) have the
same technological and informational
advantages over retail investors as
broker-dealers trading for their own
account, which enables them to
compete effectively with broker-dealer
orders and market maker quotes for
execution opportunities in the Phlx
marketplace.5
Therefore, the Exchange does not
believe it is consistent with fair
competition for the professional account
holders to continue to receive the same
marketplace advantages as retail
investors over broker-dealers trading on
the Phlx. Moreover, because customer
orders at the same price are executed in
time priority, retail investors are
prevented from benefitting fully from
the priority advantage when
professionals are afforded customer
priority.
Accordingly, the Exchange is seeking
to adopt a new term that will be used
to more appropriately provide Phlx
marketplace advantages to retail
investors on the Phlx. Under the
proposal, a ‘‘professional’’ will be
defined in Rule 1000 as a person or
entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer
in securities, and (ii) places more than
390 orders in listed options per day on
average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s). Under the
proposal, a professional account will be
treated in the same manner as an offfloor broker-dealer (controlled account)
for purposes of Phlx Rule 1014(g)(except
with respect to all-or-none orders,
which will be treated like customer
orders), 1064(b), 1064.02, and 1080.08.
The proposal will not otherwise affect
non-broker-dealer individuals or entities
under Phlx rules, and all customer
six options exchanges simultaneously. These
trading stations also provide compliance filters,
order managements tools, the ability to place orders
in the underlying securities, and market data feeds.
See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59287
(January 23, 2009), 74 FR 5964 (January 30, 2009)
(SR–ISE–2006–26) (order approving International
Securities Exchange (‘‘ISE’’) proposal to introduce
priority customer and professional orders) and
57254 (February 1, 2008), 73 FR 7345 (February 7,
2008) (SR–ISE–2006–26) (notice of ISE proposal to
introduce priority customer and professional
orders) at note 8.
5 Specialists and ROTs enter quotes based upon
the theoretical value of the option, which moves
with various factors in their pricing models, such
as the value of the underlying security. Professional
customers place and cancel orders in relation to an
option’s theoretical value in much the same manner
as specialists and ROTs. This is evidenced by the
entry of limit orders that join the best bid or offer
and by a very high rate of orders that are cancelled.
In contrast, retail customers who enter orders as
part of an investment strategy (such as covered
write or directional trade) most frequently enter
marketable orders or limit orders that they do not
cancel and replace. See, e.g. Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 57254 at note 9.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:52 Feb 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
orders will continue to be treated
equally for purposes of the linkagerelated rules, including non-brokerdealer orders included in the definition
of ‘‘professional’’ orders.6 The Exchange,
which currently routes only eligible
customer orders, would route eligible
professional orders.
In order to properly represent orders
entered on the Exchange according to
the new definition, member
organizations will be required to
indicate whether customer orders are
‘‘professional’’ orders.7 To comply with
this requirement, member organizations
will be required to review their
customers’ activity on at least a
quarterly basis to determine whether
orders that are not for the account of a
broker-dealer should be represented as
customer orders or professional orders.8
The Exchange is also proposing to
amend Rule 1063(e) and the
corresponding Options Floor Procedure
Advice (‘‘Advice’’) C–3, Options Floor
Broker Management System, to require
Floor Brokers to record the
‘‘professional’’ designator in the Floor
Broker Management System. Advice C–
3 is part of the Exchange’s minor rule
plan.9
With respect to the fees applicable to
professional orders, the Exchange is not
proposing to charge differently for
professionals at this time, such that
professional orders would be subject to
the same transaction fees as customers
today.
The Exchange believes that
identifying professional accounts based
6 See Phlx Rule 1080(m), 1083, 1084, and 1086.
These rules are not included by the proposed rule
change in the list of rules, supra, for which the
professional designation would apply.
7 See proposed Rule 1000(b)(14). The Exchange
intends to utilize a special order origin code for
professional orders. The Exchange also proposes to
disseminate the professional designator over its
new Top of Phlx Options Plus Orders (‘‘TOPO Plus
Orders’’), which includes disseminated Exchange
top-of-market data (including orders, quotes and
trades) together with all of the data currently
available on the Specialized Order Feed (‘‘SOF’’).
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60877
(October 26, 2009), 74 FR 56255 (October 30, 2009)
(SR–Phlx–2009–92).
8 Orders for any customer that had an average of
more than 390 orders per day during any month of
a calendar quarter must be represented as
professional orders for the next calendar quarter.
Member organizations will be required to conduct
a quarterly review and make any appropriate
changes to the way in which they are representing
orders within five days after the end of each
calendar quarter. While member organizations will
only be required to review their accounts on a
quarterly basis, if during a quarter the Exchange
identifies a customer for which orders are being
represented as customer orders but that has
averaged more than 390 orders per day during a
month, the Exchange will notify the member
organization and the member organization will be
required to change the manner in which it is
representing the customer’s orders within five days.
9 See Rule 970.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5361
upon the average number of orders
entered for a beneficial account is an
appropriately objective approach that
will reasonably distinguish such
persons and entities from retail
investors. The Exchange proposes the
threshold of 390 orders per day on
average over a calendar month, because
it believes that this number far exceeds
the number of orders that are entered by
retail investors in a single day,10 while
being a sufficiently low number of
orders to cover the professional account
holders that are competing with brokerdealers in the Phlx marketplace. In
addition, basing the standard on the
number of orders that are entered in
listed options for a beneficial account(s)
assures that professional account
holders cannot inappropriately avoid
the purpose of the rule by spreading
their trading activity over multiple
exchanges, and using an average
number over a calendar month will
prevent gaming of the 390 order
threshold.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 11 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 12
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest. In
particular, the proposal should assure
that retail investors continue to receive
the appropriate marketplace advantages
in the Phlx marketplace, while
furthering fair competition among
marketplace professionals.
10 390 orders is equal to the total number of
orders that a person would place in a day if that
person entered one order every minute from market
open to market close. Many of the largest retailoriented electronic brokers offer lower commission
rates to customers they define as ‘‘active traders.’’
Publicly available information from the Web sites
of Charles Schwab, Fidelity, TD Ameritrade and
optionsXpress all define ‘‘active trader’’ as someone
who executes only a few options trades per month.
The highest required trading activity to qualify as
an active trader among these four firms was 35
trades per quarter. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 57254 at note 11 (which also notes that
a study of one of the largest retail-oriented options
brokerage firms indicated that on a typical trading
day, options orders were entered with respect to
5,922 different customer accounts. There was only
one order entered with respect to 3,765 of the 5,922
different customer accounts on this day, and there
were only 17 customer accounts with respect to
which more than ten orders were entered. The
highest number of orders entered with respect to
any one account over the course of an entire week
was 27.).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5362
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 2, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
In addition, Section 11(a) of the Act
prohibits any member of a national
securities exchange from effecting
transactions on that exchange for its
own account, the account of an
associated person, or an account over
which it or its associated persons
exercises discretion, unless an
exemption applies.13 Section 11(a)(1)
contains a number of exceptions for
principal transactions by members and
their associated persons. One such
exception, set forth in subparagraph (G)
of Section 11(a)(1) and in Rule 11a1–
1(T),14 permits any transaction for a
member’s own account provided, among
other things, that the transaction yields
priority, parity, and precedence to
orders for the account of persons who
are not members or associated with
members of the exchange. Exchange
rules, therefore, may require members to
yield priority to non-members,
including public customers, to satisfy
this exception to Section 11(a).15
Another exception, found in Section
11(a)(1)(A), permits market makers to
effect transactions on exchanges in
which they are members.16
In addition to the exceptions noted
above, Rule 11a2–2(T) under the Act 17
provides exchange members with an
exception from the prohibitions in
Section 11(a). Rule 11a2–2(T), known as
the ‘‘effect versus execute’’ rule, permits
an exchange member, subject to certain
conditions, to effect transactions for his
own account, the account of an
associated person or an account with
respect to which it or an associated
person thereof exercises investment
discretion (collectively, ‘‘covered
accounts’’) by arranging for an
unaffiliated member to execute the
transaction on the exchange.
To comply with the ‘‘effect versus
execute’’ rule’s conditions, a member: (i)
Must transmit the order from off the
exchange floor; (ii) may not participate
in the execution of the transaction once
it has been transmitted to the member
performing the execution; 18 (iii) may
not be affiliated with the executing
member; and (iv) with respect to an
account over which the member has
investment discretion, neither the
member nor its associated person may
retain any compensation in connection
13 15
U.S.C. 78k(a).
CFR 240.11a1–1(T).
15 See Phlx Rule 1014.
16 15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1)(A).
17 17 CFR 240.11a2–2(T).
18 The member may, however, participate in
clearing and settling the transaction. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 14563 (March 14, 1978),
43 FR 11542 (March 17, 1978).
14 17
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:52 Feb 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
with effecting the transaction except as
provided in the rule.19
As applied to the Exchange’s
electronic trading platform, Phlx XL II,
the Exchange does not believe that the
proposal relating to professional orders
would affect the availability of the
exceptions to Section 11(a) of the Act,
including the exceptions in
subparagraph (G) of Section 11(a) and in
Rules 11a1–1(T) and 11a2–2(T), as are
currently available.20
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2010–05. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission,21 all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2010–05 and should
be submitted on or before February 23,
2010.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
Electronic Comments
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2010–05 on the
subject line.
19 17
CFR 240.11a2–2(T).
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59995
(May 28, 2009), 74 FR 26750 (June 3, 2009) (SR–
Phlx–2009–32).
20 See
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
[FR Doc. 2010–2092 Filed 2–1–10; 8:45 am]
21 The text of the proposed rule change is
available on Phlx’s Web site at https://
nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/
NASDAQOMXPHLX/Filings, on the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.sec.gov, at Phlx, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
22 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5360-5362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2092]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-61426; File No. SR-Phlx-2010-05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Professional Orders
January 26, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on January 12, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its priority rules to give certain
non-broker-dealer orders the same priority as broker-dealer orders.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/Filings/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt the new term
``professional'' for purposes of the Exchange's priority rules.
Currently, pursuant to Rule 1014(g), a customer account is an account
other than a controlled account; a controlled account is an account
controlled by or under common control with a broker-dealer. Rule
1014(g) governs, among other things, the allocation of orders and,
thus, the priority over and parity among orders and quotations.
Customer priority is one of the marketplace advantages provided to
customer orders on the Exchange; customer priority means that customer
orders are given execution priority over non-customer orders and
quotations of specialists and Registered Options Traders (``ROTs'') at
the same price. Another marketplace advantage afforded to customer
orders on the Exchange is that member organizations are generally not
charged transaction fees for the execution of customer orders. The
purpose of these marketplace advantages is to attract retail order flow
to the Exchange by leveling the playing field for retail investors over
market professionals.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Market professionals have access to sophisticated trading
systems that contain functionality not available to retail
customers, including things such as continuously updated pricing
models based upon real-time streaming data, access to multiple
markets simultaneously and order and risk management tools.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to these Phlx marketplace advantages, the Exchange
does not believe that the current definition of customer account versus
controlled account properly distinguishes between non-professional
retail investors and certain professionals. According to the Exchange,
providing marketplace advantages based upon whether the order is for
the account of a participant that is a registered broker-dealer is no
longer appropriate in today's marketplace, because some non-broker-
dealer individuals and entities have access to information and
technology that enables them to professionally trade listed options in
the same manner as a broker or dealer in securities.\4\ These
[[Page 5361]]
individual traders and entities (collectively, ``professionals'') have
the same technological and informational advantages over retail
investors as broker-dealers trading for their own account, which
enables them to compete effectively with broker-dealer orders and
market maker quotes for execution opportunities in the Phlx
marketplace.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For example, some broker-dealers provided their professional
customers with multi-screened trading stations equipped with trading
technology that allows the trader to monitor and place orders on all
six options exchanges simultaneously. These trading stations also
provide compliance filters, order managements tools, the ability to
place orders in the underlying securities, and market data feeds.
See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59287 (January 23, 2009),
74 FR 5964 (January 30, 2009) (SR-ISE-2006-26) (order approving
International Securities Exchange (``ISE'') proposal to introduce
priority customer and professional orders) and 57254 (February 1,
2008), 73 FR 7345 (February 7, 2008) (SR-ISE-2006-26) (notice of ISE
proposal to introduce priority customer and professional orders) at
note 8.
\5\ Specialists and ROTs enter quotes based upon the theoretical
value of the option, which moves with various factors in their
pricing models, such as the value of the underlying security.
Professional customers place and cancel orders in relation to an
option's theoretical value in much the same manner as specialists
and ROTs. This is evidenced by the entry of limit orders that join
the best bid or offer and by a very high rate of orders that are
cancelled. In contrast, retail customers who enter orders as part of
an investment strategy (such as covered write or directional trade)
most frequently enter marketable orders or limit orders that they do
not cancel and replace. See, e.g. Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 57254 at note 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, the Exchange does not believe it is consistent with fair
competition for the professional account holders to continue to receive
the same marketplace advantages as retail investors over broker-dealers
trading on the Phlx. Moreover, because customer orders at the same
price are executed in time priority, retail investors are prevented
from benefitting fully from the priority advantage when professionals
are afforded customer priority.
Accordingly, the Exchange is seeking to adopt a new term that will
be used to more appropriately provide Phlx marketplace advantages to
retail investors on the Phlx. Under the proposal, a ``professional''
will be defined in Rule 1000 as a person or entity that (i) is not a
broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more than 390 orders in
listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s). Under the proposal, a professional account will
be treated in the same manner as an off-floor broker-dealer (controlled
account) for purposes of Phlx Rule 1014(g)(except with respect to all-
or-none orders, which will be treated like customer orders), 1064(b),
1064.02, and 1080.08.
The proposal will not otherwise affect non-broker-dealer
individuals or entities under Phlx rules, and all customer orders will
continue to be treated equally for purposes of the linkage-related
rules, including non-broker-dealer orders included in the definition of
``professional'' orders.\6\ The Exchange, which currently routes only
eligible customer orders, would route eligible professional orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Phlx Rule 1080(m), 1083, 1084, and 1086. These rules are
not included by the proposed rule change in the list of rules,
supra, for which the professional designation would apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to properly represent orders entered on the Exchange
according to the new definition, member organizations will be required
to indicate whether customer orders are ``professional'' orders.\7\ To
comply with this requirement, member organizations will be required to
review their customers' activity on at least a quarterly basis to
determine whether orders that are not for the account of a broker-
dealer should be represented as customer orders or professional
orders.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See proposed Rule 1000(b)(14). The Exchange intends to
utilize a special order origin code for professional orders. The
Exchange also proposes to disseminate the professional designator
over its new Top of Phlx Options Plus Orders (``TOPO Plus Orders''),
which includes disseminated Exchange top-of-market data (including
orders, quotes and trades) together with all of the data currently
available on the Specialized Order Feed (``SOF''). See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 60877 (October 26, 2009), 74 FR 56255
(October 30, 2009) (SR-Phlx-2009-92).
\8\ Orders for any customer that had an average of more than 390
orders per day during any month of a calendar quarter must be
represented as professional orders for the next calendar quarter.
Member organizations will be required to conduct a quarterly review
and make any appropriate changes to the way in which they are
representing orders within five days after the end of each calendar
quarter. While member organizations will only be required to review
their accounts on a quarterly basis, if during a quarter the
Exchange identifies a customer for which orders are being
represented as customer orders but that has averaged more than 390
orders per day during a month, the Exchange will notify the member
organization and the member organization will be required to change
the manner in which it is representing the customer's orders within
five days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is also proposing to amend Rule 1063(e) and the
corresponding Options Floor Procedure Advice (``Advice'') C-3, Options
Floor Broker Management System, to require Floor Brokers to record the
``professional'' designator in the Floor Broker Management System.
Advice C-3 is part of the Exchange's minor rule plan.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Rule 970.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the fees applicable to professional orders, the
Exchange is not proposing to charge differently for professionals at
this time, such that professional orders would be subject to the same
transaction fees as customers today.
The Exchange believes that identifying professional accounts based
upon the average number of orders entered for a beneficial account is
an appropriately objective approach that will reasonably distinguish
such persons and entities from retail investors. The Exchange proposes
the threshold of 390 orders per day on average over a calendar month,
because it believes that this number far exceeds the number of orders
that are entered by retail investors in a single day,\10\ while being a
sufficiently low number of orders to cover the professional account
holders that are competing with broker-dealers in the Phlx marketplace.
In addition, basing the standard on the number of orders that are
entered in listed options for a beneficial account(s) assures that
professional account holders cannot inappropriately avoid the purpose
of the rule by spreading their trading activity over multiple
exchanges, and using an average number over a calendar month will
prevent gaming of the 390 order threshold.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 390 orders is equal to the total number of orders that a
person would place in a day if that person entered one order every
minute from market open to market close. Many of the largest retail-
oriented electronic brokers offer lower commission rates to
customers they define as ``active traders.'' Publicly available
information from the Web sites of Charles Schwab, Fidelity, TD
Ameritrade and optionsXpress all define ``active trader'' as someone
who executes only a few options trades per month. The highest
required trading activity to qualify as an active trader among these
four firms was 35 trades per quarter. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 57254 at note 11 (which also notes that a study of one
of the largest retail-oriented options brokerage firms indicated
that on a typical trading day, options orders were entered with
respect to 5,922 different customer accounts. There was only one
order entered with respect to 3,765 of the 5,922 different customer
accounts on this day, and there were only 17 customer accounts with
respect to which more than ten orders were entered. The highest
number of orders entered with respect to any one account over the
course of an entire week was 27.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \12\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest. In particular, the proposal should assure that retail
investors continue to receive the appropriate marketplace advantages in
the Phlx marketplace, while furthering fair competition among
marketplace professionals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 5362]]
In addition, Section 11(a) of the Act prohibits any member of a
national securities exchange from effecting transactions on that
exchange for its own account, the account of an associated person, or
an account over which it or its associated persons exercises
discretion, unless an exemption applies.\13\ Section 11(a)(1) contains
a number of exceptions for principal transactions by members and their
associated persons. One such exception, set forth in subparagraph (G)
of Section 11(a)(1) and in Rule 11a1-1(T),\14\ permits any transaction
for a member's own account provided, among other things, that the
transaction yields priority, parity, and precedence to orders for the
account of persons who are not members or associated with members of
the exchange. Exchange rules, therefore, may require members to yield
priority to non-members, including public customers, to satisfy this
exception to Section 11(a).\15\ Another exception, found in Section
11(a)(1)(A), permits market makers to effect transactions on exchanges
in which they are members.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78k(a).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.11a1-1(T).
\15\ See Phlx Rule 1014.
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the exceptions noted above, Rule 11a2-2(T) under the
Act \17\ provides exchange members with an exception from the
prohibitions in Section 11(a). Rule 11a2-2(T), known as the ``effect
versus execute'' rule, permits an exchange member, subject to certain
conditions, to effect transactions for his own account, the account of
an associated person or an account with respect to which it or an
associated person thereof exercises investment discretion
(collectively, ``covered accounts'') by arranging for an unaffiliated
member to execute the transaction on the exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 240.11a2-2(T).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To comply with the ``effect versus execute'' rule's conditions, a
member: (i) Must transmit the order from off the exchange floor; (ii)
may not participate in the execution of the transaction once it has
been transmitted to the member performing the execution; \18\ (iii) may
not be affiliated with the executing member; and (iv) with respect to
an account over which the member has investment discretion, neither the
member nor its associated person may retain any compensation in
connection with effecting the transaction except as provided in the
rule.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The member may, however, participate in clearing and
settling the transaction. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
14563 (March 14, 1978), 43 FR 11542 (March 17, 1978).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.11a2-2(T).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As applied to the Exchange's electronic trading platform, Phlx XL
II, the Exchange does not believe that the proposal relating to
professional orders would affect the availability of the exceptions to
Section 11(a) of the Act, including the exceptions in subparagraph (G)
of Section 11(a) and in Rules 11a1-1(T) and 11a2-2(T), as are currently
available.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59995 (May 28,
2009), 74 FR 26750 (June 3, 2009) (SR-Phlx-2009-32).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2010-05 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2010-05. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission,\21\ all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2010-05 and should be
submitted on or before February 23, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The text of the proposed rule change is available on Phlx's
Web site at https://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/Filings, on the Commission's Web site at https://www.sec.gov, at
Phlx, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2092 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P