AK Steel Corporation, Mansfield Works Division, Mansfield, OH; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 5145 [2010-1892]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Notices
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
A copy of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation; including,
among other things, a description of the
likely respondents, proposed frequency
of response, and estimated total burden
may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov
Web site at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or by contacting
Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is
not a toll-free number)/e-mail:
DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.
Interested parties are encouraged to
send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Department of Labor—Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503, Telephone: 202–395–7316/Fax:
202–395–5806 (these are not toll-free
numbers), E-mail:
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register. In order to
ensure the appropriate consideration,
comments should reference the OMB
Control Number (see below).
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a previously approved
collection.
Title of Collection: Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) for General Industry
(29 CFR part 1910, subpart I).
OMB Control Number: 1218–0205.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
3,500,000
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:35 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,552,171.
Estimated Total Annual Costs Burden
(excludes hourly wage costs): $0.
Description: 29 CFR part 1910,
subpart I of the Departments regulations
requires that employers perform hazard
assessments of the workplace to
determine if personal protective
equipment (PPE) is necessary and to
communicate PPE selection decisions to
affected workers. Subpart I also requires
that employers train affected workers in
the use of PPE and provide training
under certain circumstances. Employers
must document that the hazard
assessment and training/retraining have
been conducted. For additional
information, see the related 60-day
preclearance notice published in the
Federal Register at Vol. 74 FR 61175 on
November 23, 2009. PRA
documentation prepared in association
with the preclearance notice is available
on https://www.regulations.gov under
docket number OSHA–2009–0028.
Darrin A. King,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–71,375]
AK Steel Corporation, Mansfield Works
Division, Mansfield, OH; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated December 10,
2009, the United Steel Workers, Local
169, requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
November 2, 2009. The Notice of
Determination will soon be published in
the Federal Register.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that imports of steel coils did
not contribute importantly to worker
separations at the subject firm and no
shift of production to a foreign source
occurred.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner provided additional
information regarding customers of the
subject firm.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
January 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–1892 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–64,453]
[FR Doc. 2010–1963 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
5145
ThyssenKrupp Crankshaft Company,
LLC, Fostoria Machining, a Subsidiary
of ThyssenKrupp AG Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Kelly Services,
Manpower Temporary Agency,
Express Personnel and Trillium
Fostoria, OH; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on January 23, 2009,
applicable to workers of ThyssenKrupp
Crankshaft Company, LLC, a subsidiary
of ThyssenKrupp AG, Fastoria, Ohio.
The notice was published in the Federal
Resister on February 10, 2009 (74 FR
6653).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in activities related
to the production of crankshafts.
New information shows that workers
leased from Kelly Services, Manpower
Temporary Agency, Express Personnel
and Trillium were employed on-site by
the Fostoria, Ohio location of
ThyssenKrupp Crankshaft Company,
LLC. The Department has determined
that these workers were sufficiently
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1892]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-71,375]
AK Steel Corporation, Mansfield Works Division, Mansfield, OH;
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated December 10, 2009, the United Steel Workers,
Local 169, requested administrative reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of
the subject firm. The determination was issued on November 2, 2009. The
Notice of Determination will soon be published in the Federal Register.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that imports of steel coils did not contribute
importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of
production to a foreign source occurred.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided
additional information regarding customers of the subject firm.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of January 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-1892 Filed 1-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
