Office of Innovation and Improvement; Overview Information; Teaching American History Grant Program; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010, 3449-3454 [2010-1083]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Notices
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: January 15, 2010.
James H. Shelton, III,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2010–1081 Filed 1–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Innovation and Improvement;
Overview Information; Teaching
American History Grant Program;
Notice Inviting Applications for New
Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.215X.
Dates:
Applications Available: January 21,
2010.
Deadline for Notice of Intent To
Apply: February 22, 2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: March 22, 2010.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: May 21, 2010.
Full Text of Announcement
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Teaching
American History Grant (TAH) Program
supports projects that aim to raise
student achievement by improving
teachers’ knowledge, understanding,
and appreciation of traditional
American history. Grant awards assist
local educational agencies (LEAs), in
partnership with entities that have
extensive content expertise, in
developing, implementing,
documenting, evaluating, and
disseminating innovative, cohesive
models of professional development. By
helping teachers to develop a deeper
understanding and appreciation of
traditional American history as a
separate subject within the core
curriculum, these programs are
intended to improve instruction and
raise student achievement.
Priorities: This competition includes
one absolute priority and two
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Jan 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
invitational priorities that are explained
in the following paragraphs.
Absolute Priority: In accordance with
34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), this priority is
from section 2351 of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965, as
amended (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 6721(b)).
For FY 2010 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition, this priority is an absolute
priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we
consider only applications that meet
this priority.
This priority is:
Partnerships With Other Agencies or
Institutions.
Each applicant LEA must propose to
work in partnership with one or more of
the following:
• An institution of higher education.
• A non-profit history or humanities
organization.
• A library or museum.
Invitational Priorities: For FY 2010
and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, these
priorities are invitational priorities.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we do not
give an application that meets these
invitational priorities a competitive or
absolute preference over other
applications.
These priorities are:
1. Applications that provide for the
development and dissemination of grant
products and results through Open
Educational Resources (OER). OER are
teaching, learning, and research
resources that reside in the public
domain or have been released under an
intellectual property license that
permits their free use or repurposing by
others. This invitational priority
encourages applications that describe
how the applicants will make their TAH
grant products and resources freely
available online, in an effort to share
traditional American history content,
proven teaching strategies, and lessons
learned in implementing TAH projects
with the wider community of history
educators.
Note: Each applicant addressing this
priority is encouraged to include plans for
how the applicant will disseminate
resources, for example through a Web site
that is freely available to all users. Each of
these applicants is also encouraged to
include plans specifying how the project will
identify quality resources, such as lesson
plans, primary source activities, reading lists,
teacher reflections, and video of quality
traditional American history teaching and
student learning in action, for presentation to
the wider community.
2. Applications that provide for the
collection and use of student work and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3449
achievement data. This invitational
priority encourages projects that collect
and use student work and achievement
data to assess the impact of teacher
participation on student learning and
for continuous program improvement.
Note: A goal of this program is to improve
the quality of instruction of traditional
American history in K–12 schools. Our
purpose for establishing this priority is to
support the collection and use of student
work and achievement data that demonstrate
increased or improved knowledge and
understanding of traditional American
history content by participating teachers and
their students. The applicant is encouraged
to address how its proposed professional
development strategy will significantly
improve both history teachers’ abilities to
teach traditional American history content
and student performance with regard to
traditional American history.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6721.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84,
85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The notice of
final selection criteria and other
application requirements for this
program, published in the Federal
Register on April 15, 2005 (70 FR
19939). (c) The notice of final revisions
to selection criteria, published in the
Federal Register on December 23, 2008
(73 FR 78761).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to institutions of higher education
only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$118,952,000.
We anticipate that initial awards
under this competition will be made for
a three-year (36 month) period.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and each grantee’s substantial
progress towards accomplishing the
goals and objectives of the project as
described in its approved application,
we may make continuation awards to
grantees for the remaining 24 months of
the program. Review of each grantee’s
progress may include consideration of
evidence of promising practice and
strong evaluation design. Further,
contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in FY
2011 from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition.
Maximum Award: The following
maximum award amounts are from the
notice of final selection criteria and
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
3450
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Notices
other application requirements for this
program, published in the Federal
Register on April 15, 2005 (70 FR
19939).
(1) Total funding for a three-year
project period is a maximum of
$500,000 for LEAs with enrollments of
less than 20,000 students; $1,000,000 for
LEAs with enrollments of 20,000–
300,000 students; and $2,000,000 for
LEAs with enrollments above 300,000
students. LEAs may form consortia and
combine their enrollments in order to
receive a grant reflective of their
combined enrollment. For districts
applying jointly as a consortium, the
maximum award is based on the
combined enrollment of the individual
districts in the consortium. See section
III. Eligibility Information for
information on joint applications.
(2) A maximum of one grant will be
awarded per applicant per competition.
Estimated Number of Awards: 120–
125.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: LEAs,
including charter schools that are
considered LEAs under State law and
regulations, which must work in
partnership with one or more of the
following entities:
• An institution of higher education.
• A non-profit history or humanities
organization.
• A library or museum.
An LEA may form a consortium with
one or more other LEAs and submit a
joint application for funds. The
consortium must follow the procedures
for joint applications described in 34
CFR 75.127 through 75.129 of EDGAR.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: ED Pubs, U.S. Department of
Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria,
VA 22304. Telephone, toll free: 1–877–
433–7827. FAX: (703) 605–6794. If you
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD), call, toll free: 1–877–576–
7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web
site, also: https://www.EDPubs.gov or at
its e-mail address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package
from ED Pubs, be sure to identify this
program or competition as follows:
CFDA number 84.215X.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Jan 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) by contacting either one of the
two individuals listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
section VII of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
program. Additional information about
this competition and the application
requirements also can be found at http:
//www.ed.gov/programs/
teachinghistory/.
Notice of Intent to Apply: The
Department will be able to develop a
more efficient process for reviewing
grant applications if it has a better
understanding of the number of entities
that intend to apply for funding under
this competition. Therefore, the
Secretary strongly encourages each
potential applicant to notify the
Department by sending a short e-mail
message indicating the applicant’s
intent to submit an application for
funding. The e-mail need not include
information regarding the content of the
proposed application, only the
applicant’s intent to submit it. The
Secretary requests that this e-mail
notification be sent to Alex Stein at:
teachingamericanhistory@ed.gov.
Applicants that do not provide this email notification may still apply for
funding.
Page Limit: The application narrative
(Part III of the application) is where you,
the applicant, address the selection
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate
your application. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to limit the
application narrative and the appendix
to a total of no more than 50 pages,
using the following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial. An application submitted
in any other font (including Times
Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be
accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part
I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget
section, including the narrative budget
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
justification; Part IV, the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract.
However, the page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative section
(Part III). It also applies to the resumes,
the bibliography, and letters of support
which should be included in the
appendix.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: January 21,
2010.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
February 22, 2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: March 22, 2010.
Applications for grants under this
program must be submitted
electronically using the Electronic Grant
Application System (e-Application)
accessible through the Department’s eGrants site. For information (including
dates and times) about how to submit
your application electronically, or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement,
please refer to section IV. 6. Other
Submission Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact either one of the
two individuals listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
section VII in this notice. If the
Department provides an accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability in connection with the
application process, the individual’s
application remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: May 21, 2010.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
program.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
program must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Notices
Applications for grants under the
TAH Program—CFDA Number 84.215X
must be submitted electronically using
e-Application, accessible through the
Department’s e-Grants Web site at:
https://e-grants.ed.gov.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
While completing your electronic
application, you will be entering data
online that will be saved into a
database. You may not e-mail an
electronic copy of a grant application to
us.
Please note the following:
• You must complete the electronic
submission of your grant application by
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date. EApplication will not accept an
application for this competition after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the application
process.
• The hours of operation of the eGrants Web site are 6:00 a.m. Monday
until 7:00 p.m. Wednesday; and 6:00
a.m. Thursday until 8:00 p.m. Sunday,
Washington, DC time. Please note that,
because of maintenance, the system is
unavailable between 8:00 p.m. on
Sundays and 6:00 a.m. on Mondays, and
between 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays and
6:00 a.m. on Thursdays, Washington,
DC time. Any modifications to these
hours are posted on the e-Grants Web
site.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
you typically provide on the following
forms: the Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for
SF 424, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Jan 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
necessary assurances and certifications.
You must attach any narrative sections
of your application as files in a .DOC
(document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF
(Portable Document) format. If you
upload a file type other than the three
file types specified in this paragraph or
submit a password protected file, we
will not review that material.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page limit
requirements described in this notice.
• Prior to submitting your electronic
application, you may wish to print a
copy of it for your records.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgment that will
include a PR/Award number (an
identifying number unique to your
application).
• Within three working days after
submitting your electronic application,
fax a signed copy of the SF 424 to the
Application Control Center after
following these steps:
(1) Print SF 424 from e-Application.
(2) The applicant’s Authorizing
Representative must sign this form.
(3) Place the PR/Award number in the
upper right hand corner of the hardcopy signature page of the SF 424.
(4) Fax the signed SF 424 to the
Application Control Center at (202)
245–6272.
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on other forms at a
later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of e-Application Unavailability:
If you are prevented from electronically
submitting your application on the
application deadline date because eApplication is unavailable, we will
grant you an extension of one business
day to enable you to transmit your
application electronically, by mail, or by
hand delivery. We will grant this
extension if—
(1) You are a registered user of eApplication and you have initiated an
electronic application for this
competition; and
(2)(a) E-Application is unavailable for
60 minutes or more between the hours
of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date; or
(b) E-Application is unavailable for
any period of time between 3:30 p.m.
and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time,
on the application deadline date.
We must acknowledge and confirm
these periods of unavailability before
granting you an extension. To request
this extension or to confirm our
acknowledgment of any system
unavailability, you may contact either
(1) the person listed elsewhere in this
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3451
notice under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
(see VII. Agency Contact) or (2)
the e-Grants help desk at 1–888–336–
8930. If e-Application is unavailable
due to technical problems with the
system and, therefore, the application
deadline is extended, an e-mail will be
sent to all registered users who have
initiated an e-Application. Extensions
referred to in this section apply only to
the unavailability of e-Application.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
e-Application because—
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to eApplication; and
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevents you from using the
Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to
the Department, it must be postmarked
no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Dr. Alex Stein, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Room 4W206,
Washington, DC 20202. FAX: (202) 401–
8466.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier) your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.215X), LBJ Basement
Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260.
CONTACT
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
3452
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Notices
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application, by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.215X), 550 12th
Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260. The
Application Control Center accepts
hand deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time,
except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal
holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
grant notification within 15 business days
from the application deadline date, you
should call the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this program are from the
notice of final selection criteria and
other application requirements
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Jan 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
published in the Federal Register on
April 15, 2005 (70 FR 19939) and from
34 CFR 75.210, as permitted under the
notice of final revisions to selection
criteria, published in the Federal
Register on December 23, 2008 (73 FR
78761). The Department intends to
conduct a two-tier review process for
this competition. All eligible
applications will be reviewed and
scored on the first four criteria. Only
applications that score highly on the
first four criteria will then be reviewed
and scored on the fifth criterion, Quality
of the Project Evaluation. The Notes
following the selection criteria are
guidance to help applicants in preparing
their applications and are not required
by statute or regulations. The selection
criteria are as follows:
(1) Project quality (35 points). The
Secretary considers the quality of the
proposed project by considering:
(a) The likelihood that the proposed
project will develop, implement, and
strengthen programs to teach traditional
American history as a separate academic
subject (not as a component of social
studies) within elementary school and
secondary school curricula.
(b) How specific traditional American
history content (including the
significant issues, episodes, and turning
points in the history of the United
States; how the words and deeds of
individual Americans have determined
the course of our Nation; and how the
principles of freedom and democracy
articulated in the founding documents
of this Nation have shaped America’s
struggles and achievements and its
social, political, and legal institutions
and relations) will be covered by the
grant; the format in which the project
will deliver the history content; and the
quality of the staff and consultants
responsible for delivering these contentbased professional development
activities, emphasizing, where relevant,
their postsecondary teaching experience
and scholarship in subject areas relevant
to the teaching of traditional American
history. The applicant may also attach
curriculum vitae for individuals who
will provide the content training to the
teachers.
(c) How well the applicant describes
a plan that meets the statutory
requirement to carry out activities under
the grant in partnership with one or
more of the following:
(i) An institution of higher education.
(ii) A non-profit history or humanities
organization.
(iii) A library or museum.
(d) The applicant’s rationale for
selecting the partner(s) and its
description of specific activities that the
partner(s) will contribute to the grant
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
during each year of the project. The
applicant should include a
memorandum of understanding or
detailed letters of commitment from the
partner(s) in an appendix to the
application narrative.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants
to describe how the proposed history content
addresses traditional American history as
discussed in section V.(1)(b) of the Project
quality criterion. Applicants are also
encouraged to submit a detailed course of
study for project participants, including a
rationale for selecting the course of study,
and a schedule of activities to be carried out.
Finally, applicants are encouraged to discuss
the role and commitment of each partner and
document that each partner has been
apprised of the partner’s responsibilities for
the project.
(2) Quality of the project design (35
points). In determining the quality of
the project design, the Secretary
considers:
(a) The extent to which there is a
conceptual framework underlying the
proposed research or demonstration
activities and the quality of that
framework.
(b) The extent to which the proposed
activities constitute a coherent,
sustained program of training in the
field.
(c) The extent to which the proposed
project is part of a comprehensive effort
to improve teaching and learning and
support rigorous academic standards for
students.
(d) The extent to which the proposed
project is designed to build capacity and
yield results that will extend beyond the
period of Federal financial assistance.
(3) Need for project (20 points). In
determining the need for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers:
(a) The magnitude or severity of the
problem to be addressed by the
proposed project.
(b) The magnitude of the need for the
services to be provided or the activities
to be carried out by the proposed
project.
(c) The extent to which specific gaps
or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have
been identified and will be addressed by
the proposed project, including the
nature and magnitude of those gaps or
weaknesses.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants
to provide information on the district’s
history program, including on the number of
teachers, the teachers’ qualifications and
certifications, the history professional
development currently being offered in the
district, and student performance in
American history class. The applicant is also
encouraged to address how its proposed
professional development strategy will
significantly improve both history teachers’
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Notices
abilities to teach traditional American history
content and student performance with regard
to traditional American history. The Need for
project criterion should address the history
content needs of the teachers, not the
socioeconomic needs of the teachers or the
students they serve.
(4) Quality of the management plan
(10 points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the management plan for the
proposed project. In determining the
quality of the management plan for the
proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(a) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks.
(b) The extent to which the time
commitments of the project director and
other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the
objective of the proposed project.
(c) The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
proposed project.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Note: Section 75.112 of EDGAR requires
that an applicant (a) propose a project period
for the project and (b) include a narrative that
describes how and when, in each budget
period of the project, the applicant plans to
meet each project objective. The Secretary
encourages each applicant to address this
criterion by including in this narrative, a
clear implementation plan that includes
annual timelines, key project milestones, and
a schedule of activities, as well as a
description of the personnel who would be
responsible for each activity and the level of
effort each activity entails.
(5) Quality of the project evaluation
(25 points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the
evaluation, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(a) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation include the use of
objective performance measures that are
clearly related to the intended outcomes
of the project and will produce
quantitative and qualitative data to the
extent possible.
(b) How well the evaluation plans are
aligned with the project design
explained under the Project quality
criterion.
(c) Whether the evaluation includes
benchmarks to monitor progress toward
specific project objectives, and outcome
measures to assess the impact on
teaching and learning or other important
outcomes for project participants.
(d) Whether the applicant identifies
the individual and/or organization that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Jan 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
has agreed to serve as evaluator for the
project and includes a description of the
qualifications of that evaluator.
(e) The extent to which the applicant
indicates the following:
(i) What types of data will be
collected.
(ii) When various types of data will be
collected.
(iii) What methods will be used to
collect data.
(iv) What data collection instruments
will be developed.
(v) How the data will be analyzed.
(vi) When reports of results and
outcomes will be available.
(vii) How the applicant will use the
information collected through the
evaluation to monitor the progress of the
funded project and to provide
accountability information about both
success at the initial site and effective
strategies for replication in other
settings.
(viii) How the applicant will devote
an appropriate level of resources to
project evaluation.
Note: The Secretary encourages each
applicant to specify how the project’s
evaluation plan will address the TAH
performance measures established by the
Department under the Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA).
(The specific performance measures
established for the overall TAH Program are
discussed under Performance Measures in
section VI of this notice.) Further, each
applicant is encouraged to describe how the
applicant’s evaluation plan will be designed
to collect both output data (e.g., number of
teachers participating in a project, number of
workshops held) and outcome data (e.g.,
improvements in teacher classroom practice,
increases in student history achievement).
Finally, each applicant is encouraged to
select an independent, objective evaluator
who has experience in evaluating
educational programs and who will play an
active role in the design and development of
the project. For resources on what to consider
in designing and conducting project
evaluations, go to https://
www.whatworkshelpdesk.ed.gov/.
2. Applicant’s Past Performance and
Compliance History: In accordance with
34 CFR 75.217(d)(3)(ii) and (iii), the
Secretary may consider an applicant’s
past performance and compliance
history when evaluating applications
and in making funding decisions.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3453
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as directed by
the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The
Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34
CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: We have
established two performance measures
for the TAH Program. The measures are:
(1) The average percentage change in the
scores (on a pre-post assessment of
American history) of participants who
complete at least 75 percent of the
professional development hours offered
by the project. The assessment will be
aligned with the content provided by
the TAH project, and at least 50 percent
of its questions will come from a
validated test of American history, and
(2) the percentage of TAH participants
who complete 75 percent or more of the
total hours of professional development
offered. Grantees will be expected to
provide data on the two measures.
VII. Agency Contacts
Alex
Stein, Margarita Melendez, or Bonnie
Carter, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room
4W206, Washington, DC 20202–5960.
Telephone: (202) 205–9085, (202) 260–
3548, or (202) 401–3576 or by e-mail:
TeachingAmericanHistory@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
3454
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Notices
persons listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: January 15, 2010.
James H. Shelton III,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2010–1083 Filed 1–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services; List of
Correspondence
Department of Education.
List of Correspondence from
April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009.
AGENCY:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Secretary is publishing
the following list pursuant to section
607(f) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Under section 607(f) of the IDEA, the
Secretary is required, on a quarterly
basis, to publish in the Federal Register
a list of correspondence from the U.S.
Department of Education (Department)
received by individuals during the
previous quarter that describes the
interpretations of the Department of the
IDEA or the regulations that implement
the IDEA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Duos or Mary Louise Dirrigl.
Telephone: (202) 245–7468.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you can call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of this notice in an
accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the contact persons listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
The
following list identifies correspondence
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Jan 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
from the Department issued from April
1, 2009 through June 30, 2009. Included
on the list are those letters that contain
interpretations of the requirements of
the IDEA and its implementing
regulations, as well as letters and other
documents that the Department believes
will assist the public in understanding
the requirements of the law and its
regulations. The date of and topic
addressed by each letter are identified,
and summary information is also
provided, as appropriate. To protect the
privacy interests of the individual or
individuals involved, personally
identifiable information has been
redacted, as appropriate.
Part B—Assistance for Education of All
Children With Disabilities
Section 611—Authorization; Allotment;
Use of Funds; Authorization of
Appropriations
Topic Addressed: Use of Amounts by
Secretary of the Interior
Æ Letter dated June 30, 2009, to
Bureau of Indian Education (BIE),
Supervisory Education Specialist Gloria
J. Yepa, regarding whether the BIE can
use Part B of IDEA funds reserved for
administration to pay a portion of the
salary of an attorney who provides
advice on the administration of the
Grants to States program.
Section 614—Evaluations, Eligibility
Determinations, Individualized
Education Programs, and Educational
Placements
Topic Addressed: Evaluations, Parental
Consent, and Reevaluations
Æ Letter dated April 7, 2009, to
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Union Representative Johncarlos Torres,
regarding when screening of students to
determine appropriate instructional
strategies is permissible and when an
evaluation for special education and
related services is required.
Part C—Infants and Toddlers With
Disabilities
Section 632—Definitions
Topic Addressed: Early Intervention
Services
Æ Letter dated June 19, 2009, to New
York Department of Health, Bureau of
Early Intervention Director, Bradley
Hutton regarding New York’s policy on
respite services.
Electronic Access to This Document
You can view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister/.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll-free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 84.027, Assistance to States for
Education of Children with Disabilities)
Dated: January 14, 2010.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–1082 Filed 1–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Emergency Agency
Information Collection
U.S. Department of Energy.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) invites public comment on a
proposed emergency collection of
information that DOE is developing for
submission to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Comments regarding this
proposed information collection must
be received on or before February 4,
2010. Comments should be specific in
nature and indicate as precisely as
possible the applicable guidance
documents. If you anticipate difficulty
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3449-3454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1083]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Innovation and Improvement; Overview Information;
Teaching American History Grant Program; Notice Inviting Applications
for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.215X.
Dates:
Applications Available: January 21, 2010.
Deadline for Notice of Intent To Apply: February 22, 2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: March 22, 2010.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: May 21, 2010.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Teaching American History Grant (TAH)
Program supports projects that aim to raise student achievement by
improving teachers' knowledge, understanding, and appreciation of
traditional American history. Grant awards assist local educational
agencies (LEAs), in partnership with entities that have extensive
content expertise, in developing, implementing, documenting,
evaluating, and disseminating innovative, cohesive models of
professional development. By helping teachers to develop a deeper
understanding and appreciation of traditional American history as a
separate subject within the core curriculum, these programs are
intended to improve instruction and raise student achievement.
Priorities: This competition includes one absolute priority and two
invitational priorities that are explained in the following paragraphs.
Absolute Priority: In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), this
priority is from section 2351 of the Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 6721(b)). For FY 2010 and any
subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, this priority is an absolute
priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that
meet this priority.
This priority is:
Partnerships With Other Agencies or Institutions.
Each applicant LEA must propose to work in partnership with one or
more of the following:
An institution of higher education.
A non-profit history or humanities organization.
A library or museum.
Invitational Priorities: For FY 2010 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition, these priorities are invitational priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(1) we do not give an application that meets these
invitational priorities a competitive or absolute preference over other
applications.
These priorities are:
1. Applications that provide for the development and dissemination
of grant products and results through Open Educational Resources (OER).
OER are teaching, learning, and research resources that reside in the
public domain or have been released under an intellectual property
license that permits their free use or repurposing by others. This
invitational priority encourages applications that describe how the
applicants will make their TAH grant products and resources freely
available online, in an effort to share traditional American history
content, proven teaching strategies, and lessons learned in
implementing TAH projects with the wider community of history
educators.
Note: Each applicant addressing this priority is encouraged to
include plans for how the applicant will disseminate resources, for
example through a Web site that is freely available to all users.
Each of these applicants is also encouraged to include plans
specifying how the project will identify quality resources, such as
lesson plans, primary source activities, reading lists, teacher
reflections, and video of quality traditional American history
teaching and student learning in action, for presentation to the
wider community.
2. Applications that provide for the collection and use of student
work and achievement data. This invitational priority encourages
projects that collect and use student work and achievement data to
assess the impact of teacher participation on student learning and for
continuous program improvement.
Note: A goal of this program is to improve the quality of
instruction of traditional American history in K-12 schools. Our
purpose for establishing this priority is to support the collection
and use of student work and achievement data that demonstrate
increased or improved knowledge and understanding of traditional
American history content by participating teachers and their
students. The applicant is encouraged to address how its proposed
professional development strategy will significantly improve both
history teachers' abilities to teach traditional American history
content and student performance with regard to traditional American
history.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6721.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81,
82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The notice of final selection
criteria and other application requirements for this program, published
in the Federal Register on April 15, 2005 (70 FR 19939). (c) The notice
of final revisions to selection criteria, published in the Federal
Register on December 23, 2008 (73 FR 78761).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $118,952,000.
We anticipate that initial awards under this competition will be
made for a three-year (36 month) period.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and each grantee's
substantial progress towards accomplishing the goals and objectives of
the project as described in its approved application, we may make
continuation awards to grantees for the remaining 24 months of the
program. Review of each grantee's progress may include consideration of
evidence of promising practice and strong evaluation design. Further,
contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2011 from the list of
unfunded applicants from this competition.
Maximum Award: The following maximum award amounts are from the
notice of final selection criteria and
[[Page 3450]]
other application requirements for this program, published in the
Federal Register on April 15, 2005 (70 FR 19939).
(1) Total funding for a three-year project period is a maximum of
$500,000 for LEAs with enrollments of less than 20,000 students;
$1,000,000 for LEAs with enrollments of 20,000-300,000 students; and
$2,000,000 for LEAs with enrollments above 300,000 students. LEAs may
form consortia and combine their enrollments in order to receive a
grant reflective of their combined enrollment. For districts applying
jointly as a consortium, the maximum award is based on the combined
enrollment of the individual districts in the consortium. See section
III. Eligibility Information for information on joint applications.
(2) A maximum of one grant will be awarded per applicant per
competition.
Estimated Number of Awards: 120-125.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: LEAs, including charter schools that are
considered LEAs under State law and regulations, which must work in
partnership with one or more of the following entities:
An institution of higher education.
A non-profit history or humanities organization.
A library or museum.
An LEA may form a consortium with one or more other LEAs and submit a
joint application for funds. The consortium must follow the procedures
for joint applications described in 34 CFR 75.127 through 75.129 of
EDGAR.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: ED Pubs, U.S. Department
of Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA 22304. Telephone, toll
free: 1-877-433-7827. FAX: (703) 605-6794. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call, toll free: 1-877-
576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: https://www.EDPubs.gov or at its e-mail address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package from ED Pubs, be sure to
identify this program or competition as follows: CFDA number 84.215X.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or computer diskette) by contacting either one of the two individuals
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this
notice.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this program.
Additional information about this competition and the application
requirements also can be found at https://www.ed.gov/programs/teachinghistory/.
Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to develop a
more efficient process for reviewing grant applications if it has a
better understanding of the number of entities that intend to apply for
funding under this competition. Therefore, the Secretary strongly
encourages each potential applicant to notify the Department by sending
a short e-mail message indicating the applicant's intent to submit an
application for funding. The e-mail need not include information
regarding the content of the proposed application, only the applicant's
intent to submit it. The Secretary requests that this e-mail
notification be sent to Alex Stein at: teachingamericanhistory@ed.gov.
Applicants that do not provide this e-mail notification may still
apply for funding.
Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application)
is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that
reviewers use to evaluate your application. Applicants are strongly
encouraged to limit the application narrative and the appendix to a
total of no more than 50 pages, using the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5 x 11, on one side
only, with 1'' margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial. An application submitted in any other font
(including Times Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part
IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract.
However, the page limit does apply to all of the application narrative
section (Part III). It also applies to the resumes, the bibliography,
and letters of support which should be included in the appendix.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: January 21, 2010.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: February 22, 2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: March 22, 2010.
Applications for grants under this program must be submitted
electronically using the Electronic Grant Application System (e-
Application) accessible through the Department's e-Grants site. For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV. 6. Other Submission
Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
either one of the two individuals listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII in this notice. If the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in
connection with the application process, the individual's application
remains subject to all other requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: May 21, 2010.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this program must be submitted electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in accordance with the instructions in
this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
[[Page 3451]]
Applications for grants under the TAH Program--CFDA Number 84.215X
must be submitted electronically using e-Application, accessible
through the Department's e-Grants Web site at: https://e-grants.ed.gov.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
While completing your electronic application, you will be entering
data online that will be saved into a database. You may not e-mail an
electronic copy of a grant application to us.
Please note the following:
You must complete the electronic submission of your grant
application by 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. E-Application will not accept an application for this
competition after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you do not wait
until the application deadline date to begin the application process.
The hours of operation of the e-Grants Web site are 6:00
a.m. Monday until 7:00 p.m. Wednesday; and 6:00 a.m. Thursday until
8:00 p.m. Sunday, Washington, DC time. Please note that, because of
maintenance, the system is unavailable between 8:00 p.m. on Sundays and
6:00 a.m. on Mondays, and between 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays and 6:00 a.m.
on Thursdays, Washington, DC time. Any modifications to these hours are
posted on the e-Grants Web site.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms: the
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications. You must attach any narrative sections of your
application as files in a .DOC (document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF
(Portable Document) format. If you upload a file type other than the
three file types specified in this paragraph or submit a password
protected file, we will not review that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page
limit requirements described in this notice.
Prior to submitting your electronic application, you may
wish to print a copy of it for your records.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgment that will include a PR/Award number
(an identifying number unique to your application).
Within three working days after submitting your electronic
application, fax a signed copy of the SF 424 to the Application Control
Center after following these steps:
(1) Print SF 424 from e-Application.
(2) The applicant's Authorizing Representative must sign this form.
(3) Place the PR/Award number in the upper right hand corner of the
hard-copy signature page of the SF 424.
(4) Fax the signed SF 424 to the Application Control Center at
(202) 245-6272.
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
other forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of e-Application
Unavailability: If you are prevented from electronically submitting
your application on the application deadline date because e-Application
is unavailable, we will grant you an extension of one business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically, by mail, or by
hand delivery. We will grant this extension if--
(1) You are a registered user of e-Application and you have
initiated an electronic application for this competition; and
(2)(a) E-Application is unavailable for 60 minutes or more between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date; or
(b) E-Application is unavailable for any period of time between
3:30 p.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date.
We must acknowledge and confirm these periods of unavailability
before granting you an extension. To request this extension or to
confirm our acknowledgment of any system unavailability, you may
contact either (1) the person listed elsewhere in this notice under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT (see VII. Agency Contact) or (2) the e-
Grants help desk at 1-888-336-8930. If e-Application is unavailable due
to technical problems with the system and, therefore, the application
deadline is extended, an e-mail will be sent to all registered users
who have initiated an e-Application. Extensions referred to in this
section apply only to the unavailability of e-Application.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through e-Application because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
e-Application; and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevents you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Dr. Alex Stein, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room 4W206,
Washington, DC 20202. FAX: (202) 401-8466.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.215X), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
[[Page 3452]]
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application, by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.215X), 550 12th Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260. The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this grant notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are
from the notice of final selection criteria and other application
requirements published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2005 (70 FR
19939) and from 34 CFR 75.210, as permitted under the notice of final
revisions to selection criteria, published in the Federal Register on
December 23, 2008 (73 FR 78761). The Department intends to conduct a
two-tier review process for this competition. All eligible applications
will be reviewed and scored on the first four criteria. Only
applications that score highly on the first four criteria will then be
reviewed and scored on the fifth criterion, Quality of the Project
Evaluation. The Notes following the selection criteria are guidance to
help applicants in preparing their applications and are not required by
statute or regulations. The selection criteria are as follows:
(1) Project quality (35 points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the proposed project by considering:
(a) The likelihood that the proposed project will develop,
implement, and strengthen programs to teach traditional American
history as a separate academic subject (not as a component of social
studies) within elementary school and secondary school curricula.
(b) How specific traditional American history content (including
the significant issues, episodes, and turning points in the history of
the United States; how the words and deeds of individual Americans have
determined the course of our Nation; and how the principles of freedom
and democracy articulated in the founding documents of this Nation have
shaped America's struggles and achievements and its social, political,
and legal institutions and relations) will be covered by the grant; the
format in which the project will deliver the history content; and the
quality of the staff and consultants responsible for delivering these
content-based professional development activities, emphasizing, where
relevant, their postsecondary teaching experience and scholarship in
subject areas relevant to the teaching of traditional American history.
The applicant may also attach curriculum vitae for individuals who will
provide the content training to the teachers.
(c) How well the applicant describes a plan that meets the
statutory requirement to carry out activities under the grant in
partnership with one or more of the following:
(i) An institution of higher education.
(ii) A non-profit history or humanities organization.
(iii) A library or museum.
(d) The applicant's rationale for selecting the partner(s) and its
description of specific activities that the partner(s) will contribute
to the grant during each year of the project. The applicant should
include a memorandum of understanding or detailed letters of commitment
from the partner(s) in an appendix to the application narrative.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants to describe how the
proposed history content addresses traditional American history as
discussed in section V.(1)(b) of the Project quality criterion.
Applicants are also encouraged to submit a detailed course of study
for project participants, including a rationale for selecting the
course of study, and a schedule of activities to be carried out.
Finally, applicants are encouraged to discuss the role and
commitment of each partner and document that each partner has been
apprised of the partner's responsibilities for the project.
(2) Quality of the project design (35 points). In determining the
quality of the project design, the Secretary considers:
(a) The extent to which there is a conceptual framework underlying
the proposed research or demonstration activities and the quality of
that framework.
(b) The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a
coherent, sustained program of training in the field.
(c) The extent to which the proposed project is part of a
comprehensive effort to improve teaching and learning and support
rigorous academic standards for students.
(d) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build
capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of
Federal financial assistance.
(3) Need for project (20 points). In determining the need for the
proposed project, the Secretary considers:
(a) The magnitude or severity of the problem to be addressed by the
proposed project.
(b) The magnitude of the need for the services to be provided or
the activities to be carried out by the proposed project.
(c) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants to provide information
on the district's history program, including on the number of
teachers, the teachers' qualifications and certifications, the
history professional development currently being offered in the
district, and student performance in American history class. The
applicant is also encouraged to address how its proposed
professional development strategy will significantly improve both
history teachers'
[[Page 3453]]
abilities to teach traditional American history content and student
performance with regard to traditional American history. The Need
for project criterion should address the history content needs of
the teachers, not the socioeconomic needs of the teachers or the
students they serve.
(4) Quality of the management plan (10 points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project.
In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(a) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks.
(b) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate
to meet the objective of the proposed project.
(c) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the proposed project.
Note: Section 75.112 of EDGAR requires that an applicant (a)
propose a project period for the project and (b) include a narrative
that describes how and when, in each budget period of the project,
the applicant plans to meet each project objective. The Secretary
encourages each applicant to address this criterion by including in
this narrative, a clear implementation plan that includes annual
timelines, key project milestones, and a schedule of activities, as
well as a description of the personnel who would be responsible for
each activity and the level of effort each activity entails.
(5) Quality of the project evaluation (25 points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible.
(b) How well the evaluation plans are aligned with the project
design explained under the Project quality criterion.
(c) Whether the evaluation includes benchmarks to monitor progress
toward specific project objectives, and outcome measures to assess the
impact on teaching and learning or other important outcomes for project
participants.
(d) Whether the applicant identifies the individual and/or
organization that has agreed to serve as evaluator for the project and
includes a description of the qualifications of that evaluator.
(e) The extent to which the applicant indicates the following:
(i) What types of data will be collected.
(ii) When various types of data will be collected.
(iii) What methods will be used to collect data.
(iv) What data collection instruments will be developed.
(v) How the data will be analyzed.
(vi) When reports of results and outcomes will be available.
(vii) How the applicant will use the information collected through
the evaluation to monitor the progress of the funded project and to
provide accountability information about both success at the initial
site and effective strategies for replication in other settings.
(viii) How the applicant will devote an appropriate level of
resources to project evaluation.
Note: The Secretary encourages each applicant to specify how the
project's evaluation plan will address the TAH performance measures
established by the Department under the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA). (The specific performance measures
established for the overall TAH Program are discussed under
Performance Measures in section VI of this notice.) Further, each
applicant is encouraged to describe how the applicant's evaluation
plan will be designed to collect both output data (e.g., number of
teachers participating in a project, number of workshops held) and
outcome data (e.g., improvements in teacher classroom practice,
increases in student history achievement). Finally, each applicant
is encouraged to select an independent, objective evaluator who has
experience in evaluating educational programs and who will play an
active role in the design and development of the project. For
resources on what to consider in designing and conducting project
evaluations, go to https://www.whatworkshelpdesk.ed.gov/.
2. Applicant's Past Performance and Compliance History: In
accordance with 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3)(ii) and (iii), the Secretary may
consider an applicant's past performance and compliance history when
evaluating applications and in making funding decisions.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN). We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your project period, you must submit a
final performance report, including financial information, as directed
by the Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an
annual performance report that provides the most current performance
and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements
on reporting, please go to https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: We have established two performance
measures for the TAH Program. The measures are: (1) The average
percentage change in the scores (on a pre-post assessment of American
history) of participants who complete at least 75 percent of the
professional development hours offered by the project. The assessment
will be aligned with the content provided by the TAH project, and at
least 50 percent of its questions will come from a validated test of
American history, and (2) the percentage of TAH participants who
complete 75 percent or more of the total hours of professional
development offered. Grantees will be expected to provide data on the
two measures.
VII. Agency Contacts
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Stein, Margarita Melendez, or
Bonnie Carter, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 4W206, Washington, DC 20202-5960. Telephone: (202) 205-9085, (202)
260-3548, or (202) 401-3576 or by e-mail:
TeachingAmericanHistory@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact
[[Page 3454]]
persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister. To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: January 15, 2010.
James H. Shelton III,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2010-1083 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P