Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Results of Administrative Review, 2487 [2010-719]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–502]
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
and Tubes from Thailand: Court
Decision Not in Harmony with Final
Results of Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 4, 2010, the U.S.
Court for International Trade (CIT)
sustained the Department of
Commerce’s (the Department) results of
redetermination pursuant to the CIT’s
remand and entered final judgment in
Saha Thai v. United States, Ct. 08–380,
Slip Op. 09–116. Consistent with the
decision of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)
in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d
337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), the
Department is notifying the public that
the final judgment in this case is not in
harmony with the Department’s final
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping order on circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes
from Thailand covering the period
March 1, 2006 through February 28,
2007. Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 73 FR 61019
(October 15, 2008) (Final Results).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Dana
Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20230.; telephone:
(202) 482–5255 OR (202) 482–1391,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On October 15, 2008, the Department
published the final results of its
administrative review of circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes
from Thailand. See Final Results. In the
Final Results, after considering
additional information and the
arguments of both Saha Thai and Allied
Tube and Conduit Corporation and
Wheatland Tube Company (collectively,
the petitioners), the Department granted
an upward adjustment to export price in
accordance with 772(c)(1) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
which directs the Department to
increase export price by ‘‘the amount of
any import duties imposed by the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:34 Jan 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
country of exportation which have been
rebated, or which have not been
collected, by reason of the exportation
of the subject merchandise to the United
States.’’ See Section 772(c)(1) of the Act.
Consistent with the Department’s
practice in the two most recently
completed administrative reviews of
this order, we calculated this upward
adjustment to export price for exempted
import duties using Saha Thai’s actual
yield loss factor rather than the
Government of Thailand’s (GOT)
average yield loss factor. See Final
Results and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 4.
In Saha Thai v. United States, Ct. 08–
380, Slip Op. 09–116, on October 15,
2009, the CIT remanded the Final
Results, directing the Department to
recalculate Saha Thai’s antidumping
duty margin using the GOT average
yield loss factor to calculate an
adjustment to export price for exempted
import duties. The Department issued
its final results of redetermination
pursuant to the CIT’s October 15, 2009
ruling. See Results of the
Redetermination Pursuant to Remand,
dated December 11, 2009 (found at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/remands/
index.html). The Department explained
that it had followed the CIT’s directive
and had recalculated Saha Thai’s
antidumping duty margin using the
GOT mandated yield loss factor to
calculate the upward adjustment to
export price for the exempted import
duties. The Department’s
redetermination resulted in changes to
the Final Results weighted–average
margin from 4.26 percent to 4.21
percent. On January 4, 2010, the CIT
sustained the Department’s
redetermination.
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken, 893 F. 2d
at 341, the CAFC held that, pursuant to
section 516A(e) of the Act, the
Department must publish a notice of a
court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’
with a Department determination and
must suspend liquidation of entries
pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.
The CIT’s January 4, 2010 decision in
Saha Thai v. United States constitutes a
final decision of that court that is not in
harmony with the Department’s Final
Results. This notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken. Accordingly,
the Department will continue the
suspension of liquidation of the subject
merchandise pending the expiration of
the period of appeal or, if appealed,
pending a final and conclusive court
decision. In the event the CIT’s ruling is
not appealed, or if appealed, is upheld
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2487
by the CAFC, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to assess antidumping duties
on entries of the subject merchandise
during the POR from Saha Thai based
on revised assessment rates calculated
by the Department. The effective date of
this notice is January 14, 2010, ten days
from the date of the issuance of the
court decision.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 516A(c)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: January 11, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–719 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 1–2010]
Foreign-Trade Zone 176—Rockford, IL;
Application for Reorganization/
Expansion Under Alternative Site
Framework
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board
(the Board) by the Greater Rockford
Airport Authority, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 176, requesting authority to
reorganize the zone under the
alternative site framework (ASF)
adopted by the Board (74 FR 1170, 1/12/
09; correction 74 FR 3987, 1/22/09). The
ASF is an option for grantees for the
establishment or reorganization of
general-purpose zones and can permit
significantly greater flexibility in the
designation of new ‘‘usage-driven’’ FTZ
sites for operators/users located within
a grantee’s ‘‘service area’’ in the context
of the Board’s standard 2,000-acre
activation limit for a general-purpose
zone project. The application was
submitted pursuant to the Foreign-Trade
Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–
81u) and the regulations of the Board
(15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed
January 6, 2010.
FTZ 176 was approved by the Board
on March 1, 1991 (Board Order 511, 56
FR 10409, 3/12/91) and expanded on
February 9, 2005 (Board Order 1368, 70
FR 9613, 2/28/05), August 3, 2006
(Board Order 1473, 71 FR 47483, 8/17/
06 and on January 30, 2009 (Board
Order 1603, 74 FR 6570, 2/10/09). The
general-purpose zone currently consists
of the following sites: Site 1: (1,308
acres)—seven parcels located in and
around the Chicago Rockford
International Airport (including the
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 2487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-719]
[[Page 2487]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-502]
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Court
Decision Not in Harmony with Final Results of Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 4, 2010, the U.S. Court for International Trade
(CIT) sustained the Department of Commerce's (the Department) results
of redetermination pursuant to the CIT's remand and entered final
judgment in Saha Thai v. United States, Ct. 08-380, Slip Op. 09-116.
Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), the Department is notifying the public that
the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department's
final results of the administrative review of the antidumping order on
circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand covering the
period March 1, 2006 through February 28, 2007. Circular Welded Carbon
Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 73 FR 61019 (October 15, 2008) (Final Results).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Dana
Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.; telephone:
(202) 482-5255 OR (202) 482-1391, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 15, 2008, the Department published the final results of
its administrative review of circular welded carbon steel pipes and
tubes from Thailand. See Final Results. In the Final Results, after
considering additional information and the arguments of both Saha Thai
and Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation and Wheatland Tube Company
(collectively, the petitioners), the Department granted an upward
adjustment to export price in accordance with 772(c)(1) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), which directs the Department to
increase export price by ``the amount of any import duties imposed by
the country of exportation which have been rebated, or which have not
been collected, by reason of the exportation of the subject merchandise
to the United States.'' See Section 772(c)(1) of the Act. Consistent
with the Department's practice in the two most recently completed
administrative reviews of this order, we calculated this upward
adjustment to export price for exempted import duties using Saha Thai's
actual yield loss factor rather than the Government of Thailand's (GOT)
average yield loss factor. See Final Results and accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4.
In Saha Thai v. United States, Ct. 08-380, Slip Op. 09-116, on
October 15, 2009, the CIT remanded the Final Results, directing the
Department to recalculate Saha Thai's antidumping duty margin using the
GOT average yield loss factor to calculate an adjustment to export
price for exempted import duties. The Department issued its final
results of redetermination pursuant to the CIT's October 15, 2009
ruling. See Results of the Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, dated
December 11, 2009 (found at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/remands/).
The Department explained that it had followed the CIT's directive and
had recalculated Saha Thai's antidumping duty margin using the GOT
mandated yield loss factor to calculate the upward adjustment to export
price for the exempted import duties. The Department's redetermination
resulted in changes to the Final Results weighted-average margin from
4.26 percent to 4.21 percent. On January 4, 2010, the CIT sustained the
Department's redetermination.
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken, 893 F. 2d at 341, the CAFC held that,
pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Act, the Department must publish a
notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department
determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a
``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's January 4, 2010 decision in
Saha Thai v. United States constitutes a final decision of that court
that is not in harmony with the Department's Final Results. This notice
is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.
Accordingly, the Department will continue the suspension of liquidation
of the subject merchandise pending the expiration of the period of
appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision.
In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or if appealed, is
upheld by the CAFC, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on entries of the
subject merchandise during the POR from Saha Thai based on revised
assessment rates calculated by the Department. The effective date of
this notice is January 14, 2010, ten days from the date of the issuance
of the court decision.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
516A(c)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 11, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-719 Filed 1-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S