National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)-Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program-Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers (RRTCs)-Employer Practices Related to Employment Outcomes Among Individuals With Disabilities, 2119-2122 [2010-480]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
United States Air Force Academy, 2348
Sijan Drive, Suite 100, United States Air
Force Academy, CO 80840–8280.’’
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
Delete entry and replace with
‘‘Individuals seeking to determine
whether this system of records contains
information on themselves should
address inquiries to Command
Chaplain, Headquarters, United States
Air Force Academy, 2348 Sijan Drive,
Suite 100, United States Air Force
Academy, CO 80840–8280.
Requests should contain individual’s
name and Social Security Number
(SSN).’’
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURE:
Delete entry and replace with
‘‘Individuals seeking to access records
about themselves contained in this
system should address requests to
Command Chaplain, Headquarters,
United States Air Force Academy, 2348
Sijan Drive, Suite 100, United States Air
Force Academy, CO 80840–8280.
Requests should contain individuals’
full name and Social Security Number
(SSN).’’
*
*
*
*
*
F052 USAFA A
SYSTEM NAME:
Cadet Chaplain Records.
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Command Chaplain, Headquarters,
United States Air Force Academy, 2348
Sijan Drive, Suite 100, United States Air
Force Academy, CO 80840–8280.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
Air Force Academy Cadets.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Name, Social Security Number (SSN),
religious affiliation, background and
interests, and choir audition consisting
of musical capabilities.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
10 U.S.C. 9331, Establishment;
Superintendent; faculty, 10 U.S.C. 9337,
Chaplain, and E.O. 9397 (SSN), as
amended.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
PURPOSE(S):
To identify incoming Fourth Class
Cadet’s religious affiliation, background
data and interests. Cadet Chaplains and
chapel managers assigned to the USAF
Academy Cadet Chaplin’s office use this
information to organize cadet lay
participation as ushers, choir members,
lay readers, lectors, commentators, and
religious education teachers. Choir
audition records identify incoming
cadet’s musical capabilities and the
music directors use this information.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
In addition to those disclosures
generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
552a(b) of the Privacy Act of 1974, these
records or information may specifically
be disclosed outside the DoD as a
routine use pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(b)(3) as follows:
The ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ published
at the beginning of the Air Force’s
compilation of systems of records
notices apply to this system.
2119
United States Air Force Academy, 2348
Sijan Drive, Suite 100, United States Air
Force Academy, CO 80840–8280.
Requests should contain individual’s
full name and Social Security Number
(SSN).
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
The Air Force rules for accessing
records, and for contesting contents and
appealing initial agency determinations
are published in Air Force Instruction
37–132; 32 CFR part 806b; or may be
obtained from the system manager.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
RECORDS SOURCE CATEGORIES:
STORAGE:
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
Maintained on computer and
electronic storage media.
RETRIEVABILITY:
Information obtained from individual
cadet.
None.
[FR Doc. 2010–589 Filed 1–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
Retrieved by name and Social
Security Number (SSN).
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SAFEGUARDS:
Records are accessed by the
custodian, individuals responsible for
servicing the record system in the
course of their official duties, and by
authorized personnel who are properly
cleared for need-to-know. Records are
stored in locked rooms and on computer
storage devices protected by computer
system software.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
Records are destroyed one year after
graduation or discharge from the
program. Records are destroyed by
tearing into pieces, shredding, pulping,
macerating or burning. Computer
records are destroyed by erasing,
deleting overwriting or degaussing.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Command Chaplain, Headquarters,
United States Air Force Academy, 2348
Sijan Drive, Suite 100, United States Air
Force Academy, CO 80840–8280.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
Individuals seeking to determine
whether this system of records contains
information on themselves should
address inquiries to Command
Chaplain, Headquarters, United States
Air Force Academy, 2348 Sijan Drive,
Suite 100, United States Air Force
Academy, CO 80840–8280.
Requests should contain individual’s
name and Social Security Number
(SSN).
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking to access records
about themselves contained in this
system should address requests to
Command Chaplain, Headquarters,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)—
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program—
Rehabilitation Research and Training
Centers (RRTCs)—Employer Practices
Related to Employment Outcomes
Among Individuals With Disabilities
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.133B–3.
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a funding priority for
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
administered by NIDRR. Specifically,
this notice proposes a priority for
RRTCs on Employer Practices Related to
Employment Outcomes Among
Individuals with Disabilities. The
Assistant Secretary may use this priority
for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2010
and later years. We take this action to
focus research attention on areas of
national need. We intend this priority to
improve rehabilitation services and
outcomes for individuals with
disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before February 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this notice to Donna Nangle, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., room 6029, Potomac
Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC
20202–2700.
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
2120
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
If you prefer to send your comments
by e-mail, use the following address:
donna.nangle@ed.gov. You must
include the term ‘‘Proposed Priority for
an RRTC on Employer Practices Related
to Employment Outcomes Among
Individuals with Disabilities’’ in the
subject line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Nangle. Telephone: (202) 245–
7462 or by e-mail:
donna.nangle@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of proposed priority is in concert
with NIDRR’s Final Long-Range Plan for
FY 2005–2009 (Plan). The Plan, which
was published in the Federal Register
on February 15, 2006 (71 FR 8165), can
be accessed on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/
about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/
policy.html.
Through the implementation of the
Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve the
quality and utility of disability and
rehabilitation research; (2) foster an
exchange of expertise, information, and
training to facilitate the advancement of
knowledge and understanding of the
unique needs of traditionally
underserved populations; (3) determine
best strategies and programs to improve
rehabilitation outcomes for underserved
populations; (4) identify research gaps;
(5) identify mechanisms of integrating
research and practice; and (6)
disseminate findings.
This notice proposes a priority that
NIDRR intends to use for RRTC
competitions in FY 2010 and possibly
later years. However, nothing precludes
NIDRR from publishing additional
priorities, if needed. Furthermore,
NIDRR is under no obligation to make
an award for this priority. The decision
to make an award will be based on the
quality of applications received and
available funding.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding this notice. To ensure that
your comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final priority,
we urge you to clearly identify the
specific topic that each comment
addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
this proposed priority. Please let us
know of any further ways we could
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice in room 6029, 550 12th
Street, SW., PCP, Washington, DC,
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m., Washington, DC, time, Monday
through Friday of each week except
Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Project and Centers Program is
to plan and conduct research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, including
international activities, to develop
methods, procedures and rehabilitation
technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities, and to
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended.
RRTC Program
The purpose of the RRTC program is
to improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended, through advanced
research, training, technical assistance,
and dissemination activities in general
problem areas, as specified by NIDRR.
Such activities are designed to benefit
rehabilitation service providers,
individuals with disabilities, and the
family members or other authorized
representatives of individuals with
disabilities. In addition, NIDRR intends
to require all RRTC applicants to meet
the requirements of the General
Rehabilitation Research and Training
Centers (RRTC) Requirements priority
that it published in a notice of final
priorities in the Federal Register on
February 1, 2008 (72 FR 6132).
Additional information on the RRTC
program can be found at: https://
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/resprogram.html#RRTC.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
of RRTCs
RRTCs must—
• Carry out coordinated advanced
programs of rehabilitation research;
• Provide training, including
graduate, pre-service, and in-service
training, to help rehabilitation
personnel more effectively provide
rehabilitation services to individuals
with disabilities;
• Provide technical assistance to
individuals with disabilities, their
representatives, providers, and other
interested parties;
• Disseminate informational materials
to individuals with disabilities, their
representatives, providers, and other
interested parties; and
• Serve as centers of national
excellence in rehabilitation research for
individuals with disabilities, their
representatives, providers, and other
interested parties.
Applicants for RRTC grants also must
demonstrate in their applications how
they will address, in whole or in part,
the needs of individuals with
disabilities from minority backgrounds.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g)
and 764(b)(2).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority: This notice
contains one proposed priority.
Employer Practices Related to
Employment Outcomes Among
Individuals With Disabilities
Background
Individuals with disabilities
experience lower rates of employment
than those without disabilities, and this
disparity in employment rates is seen
across all sociodemographic groups
(Steinmetz, 2006; U.S. Census Bureau,
2006; U.S. Department of Labor, 2009).
This disparity in employment rates, as
well as differences in other aspects of
employment (e.g., retention rates, job
satisfaction, wages), appear to reflect, at
least in part, differences in employer
practices related to hiring, promoting,
and retaining employees who have or
acquire disabilities (U.S. Department of
Labor, 2009). While it is difficult to
obtain employer-level information, there
is some recent evidence regarding the
relationship between employer practices
and outcomes for individuals with
disabilities. In 2008, the Office of
Disability Employment Policy of the
U.S. Department of Labor funded an
employer survey that examined
employer practices related to hiring,
advancing, and retaining employees
with disabilities (U.S. Department of
Labor, 2009). The study indicated that
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
companies reporting that they actively
recruit employees with disabilities
differ from other companies in several
domains. For example, companies that
recruited individuals with disabilities
were generally less likely than others to
identify challenges in hiring individuals
with disabilities (e.g., accommodation
costs, nature of the work, concern about
health care costs) and were more likely
to identify strategies that were helpful
in recruiting employees with disabilities
(e.g., developing a targeted recruitment
program, visible top management
commitment, providing flexible work
schedules). In addition, companies that
reported actively recruiting employees
with disabilities were less likely to have
identified the following concerns
regarding hiring individuals with
disabilities: That employing workers
with disabilities increased the cost of
doing business, that workers with
disabilities lack relevant skills and
experience, and that employees with
disabilities posed greater risks to safety
and productivity.
Analysis of the responses revealed
that employer characteristics, including
company size, sector of the economy,
and industry type, were related to the
employers’ responses. Larger employers
and employers in the public sector were
more likely than other employers to
report employing individuals with
disabilities and actively recruiting
applicants with disabilities. Larger
companies were also more likely to
report having hired employees with
disabilities within the last 12 months.
Smaller and medium-sized companies
were more likely to report that health
care costs, workers compensation costs,
and fear of litigation were challenges in
hiring individuals with disabilities.
When asked about concerns related to
hiring employees with disabilities,
smaller and medium-sized companies
were more likely to cite concerns about
costs of employing individuals with
disabilities and the belief that workers
with disabilities lack relevant skills and
experience. In contrast, larger
companies were more concerned about
supervisors’ uncertainty regarding how
to take disciplinary action against
employees with disabilities. When
questioned about perceived challenges
to retaining employees with disabilities,
smaller companies expressed greater
concerns about the cost of health care
coverage and workers compensation.
Responses also varied by organization
type. Companies in construction, goodsproducing, and retail trades were more
likely than others to indicate that the
nature of the work was a challenge in
hiring individuals with disabilities.
Public organizations were more likely
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
than private sector agencies to report
that they actively recruited employees
with disabilities.
The results of this study suggest that
organizations of different sizes, and
from different industries and sectors of
the economy, differ in employer
practices with regard to individuals
with disabilities. However, these
findings are largely based on the
attitudes, opinions or perceptions of
employers, rather than on objectively
measured employer practices and
employment outcomes. Building upon
these findings by obtaining empirical
data about actual employer practices,
and further investigating the extent to
which these practices are associated
with employment for individuals with
disabilities, would inform the
development of interventions to
improve the number and diversity of
employment opportunities for
individuals with disabilities.
References
Steinmetz, E. (2006). Americans With
Disabilities: 2002. Household Economic
Studies Current Population Reports P70–
107 Washington, DC: U.S. Census
Bureau. See https://www.census.gov/
hhes/www/disability/sipp/
disable02.html.
U.S. Census Bureau (2006). American
Community Survey table B1802:
Selected Economic Characteristics for
the Civilian Noninstitutionalized
Population By Disability Status.
Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
See https://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/
STTable?_bm=y&qr_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_S1802&geo_id=01000US&ds_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_&_lang=en&-format=&-CONTEXT=st.
U.S. Department of Labor (2009). Survey of
Employer Perspectives on the
Employment of People with Disabilities.
See https://www.dol.gov/odep/categories/
research/index.htm.
U.S. Department of Labor (2009). Labor force
statistics from the Current Population
Survey: Employment status and
disability status, January 2009.
See https://www.bls.gov/cps/
cpsdisability_012009.htm.
Proposed Priority
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
proposes a priority for a Rehabilitation
Research and Training Center (RRTC) on
Employer Practices Related to
Employment Outcomes Among
Individuals with Disabilities. This RRTC
must conduct research that contributes
to our knowledge about the differences
that exist in employer practices towards
hiring individuals with disabilities and
the relationship between different
practices and employment outcomes for
individuals with disabilities. This new
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2121
knowledge will contribute to more
targeted interventions to improve
employer practices related to the
employment of individuals with
disabilities. Under this priority, the
RRTC must contribute to the following
outcomes:
(a) New knowledge of specific
employer practices most strongly
associated with desired employment
outcomes for individuals with
disabilities and the prevalence of these
practices. The RRTC must contribute to
this outcome by identifying and
categorizing employer practices related
to the hiring, retention, and
advancement of individuals with
disabilities and conducting research on
the extent to which employers engage in
specific practices that have been found
in relevant research to promote positive
employment outcomes for individuals
with disabilities. Factors that are
associated with such practices include,
but are not limited to: employer size,
geographic regions, sector of industry or
the economy (e.g., private sector, public
sector, goods-producing, serviceproducing), employer preconceptions,
and experience working with vocational
rehabilitation agencies.
(b) Increased knowledge about how
these practices relate to employer
success in hiring, retention, and
promotion of individuals with
disabilities. Applicants must propose
strategies to collect information about
these practices and outcomes directly
from employers, taking into account that
it can be difficult to collect information
about employer practices and outcomes.
In addition, applicants are encouraged
to use existing databases such as those
maintained by the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, the Small
Business Administration, the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs,
and disability insurance providers.
(c) Increased incorporation of findings
into practice and policy. The RRTC
must contribute to this outcome by:
(1) Collaborating with employer
groups to develop, evaluate, or
implement strategies to increase
utilization of positive practices
identified by the RRTC.
(2) Conducting training and
dissemination activities to facilitate the
utilization of research findings in
employment and policy settings.
In addition, this RRTC must
collaborate with:
(1) Relevant Rehabilitation Services
Administration grantees, such as the
10 regional Technical Assistance and
Continuing Education projects.
(2) Relevant grantees and programs in
the Department of Labor, including the
Office of Disability Employment
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
2122
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
Policy’s National Technical Assistance,
Policy, and Research Center for
Employers.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority: We will announce the
final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final
priority after considering responses to
this notice and other information
available to the Department. This notice
does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements,
definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking
requirements.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
proposed regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this proposed regulatory action are
those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this proposed regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Discussion of Costs and Benefits
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
The benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Programs have been well
established over the years in that similar
projects have been completed
successfully. This proposed priority will
generate new knowledge through
research and development activities.
Another benefit of this proposed
priority is that the establishment of a
new RRTC will support the research and
will improve the lives of individuals
with disabilities. The new RRTC will
generate, disseminate, and promote the
use of new information that will
improve the options for individuals
with disabilities to obtain, retain, and
advance in employment.
Additional Guidance Regarding
Application of Current Procedures for
Testing Energy Consumption of
Refrigerator-Freezers With Automatic
Ice Makers
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS,
toll-free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: January 8, 2010.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–480 Filed 1–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
Department of Energy’s (DOE) guidance
to ensure the consistent application of
DOE’s current test procedure to
refrigerator-freezers with French doors,
bottom-mounted freezers, and throughthe-door (TTD) ice service (French door
TTD models). This Guidance was issued
on December 18, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Stephanie Weiner at 202–586–9648.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975, as amended, (EPCA or the Act)
requires the Department of Energy (DOE
or the Department) to prescribe
standardized test procedures to measure
the energy consumption of certain
consumer products. See 42 U.S.C. 6293,
6295(r). The Department’s current test
procedure for residential refrigeratorfreezers is set forth at 10 CFR Part 430,
Subpart B, Appendix A1, Uniform Test
Method for Measuring the Energy
Consumption of Electric Refrigerators
and Electric Refrigerator-Freezers
(Appendix A1). DOE issues this
guidance to ensure the consistent
application of the current test procedure
to refrigerator-freezers with French
doors, bottom-mounted freezers, and
through-the-door (TTD) ice service
(French door TTD models).
Appendix A1 requires products to be
tested in accordance with the relevant
sections of Association of Home
Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM)
standard HRF–1–1979 (HRF–1). See
Appendix A1, section 2.2; 47 FR 34517
(Aug. 10, 1982). HRF–1 specifies that
‘‘automatic ice makers are to be
inoperative during the test’’ (‘‘ice maker
exclusion’’). See HRF–1, section 7.4.2.
HRF–1 defines ‘‘automatic ice maker’’ as
‘‘[a] device, connected to a water supply,
which automatically produces, harvests,
and stores ice in a storage bin, with
means to automatically interrupt the
harvesting operation when the bin is
filled to a predetermined amount.’’ Id. at
sec. 3.5.
At the time when AHAM developed
and DOE adopted HRF–1, refrigeratorfreezer models equipped with automatic
ice makers located the ice maker in the
freezer compartments, rather than
separate ice compartments outside the
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2119-2122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-480]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR)--Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers
Program--Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers (RRTCs)--Employer
Practices Related to Employment Outcomes Among Individuals With
Disabilities
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.133B-3.
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services proposes a funding priority for the Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program administered
by NIDRR. Specifically, this notice proposes a priority for RRTCs on
Employer Practices Related to Employment Outcomes Among Individuals
with Disabilities. The Assistant Secretary may use this priority for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2010 and later years. We take this
action to focus research attention on areas of national need. We intend
this priority to improve rehabilitation services and outcomes for
individuals with disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before February 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this notice to Donna Nangle, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 6029, Potomac
Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700.
[[Page 2120]]
If you prefer to send your comments by e-mail, use the following
address: donna.nangle@ed.gov. You must include the term ``Proposed
Priority for an RRTC on Employer Practices Related to Employment
Outcomes Among Individuals with Disabilities'' in the subject line of
your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Nangle. Telephone: (202) 245-
7462 or by e-mail: donna.nangle@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of proposed priority is in
concert with NIDRR's Final Long-Range Plan for FY 2005-2009 (Plan). The
Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2006
(71 FR 8165), can be accessed on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve
the quality and utility of disability and rehabilitation research; (2)
foster an exchange of expertise, information, and training to
facilitate the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the unique
needs of traditionally underserved populations; (3) determine best
strategies and programs to improve rehabilitation outcomes for
underserved populations; (4) identify research gaps; (5) identify
mechanisms of integrating research and practice; and (6) disseminate
findings.
This notice proposes a priority that NIDRR intends to use for RRTC
competitions in FY 2010 and possibly later years. However, nothing
precludes NIDRR from publishing additional priorities, if needed.
Furthermore, NIDRR is under no obligation to make an award for this
priority. The decision to make an award will be based on the quality of
applications received and available funding.
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding this notice. To ensure
that your comments have maximum effect in developing the notice of
final priority, we urge you to clearly identify the specific topic that
each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from this proposed
priority. Please let us know of any further ways we could reduce
potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this notice in room 6029, 550 12th Street, SW., PCP,
Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC, time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Project and Centers Program is to plan and
conduct research, demonstration projects, training, and related
activities, including international activities, to develop methods,
procedures and rehabilitation technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living,
family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe
disabilities, and to improve the effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.
RRTC Program
The purpose of the RRTC program is to improve the effectiveness of
services authorized under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
through advanced research, training, technical assistance, and
dissemination activities in general problem areas, as specified by
NIDRR. Such activities are designed to benefit rehabilitation service
providers, individuals with disabilities, and the family members or
other authorized representatives of individuals with disabilities. In
addition, NIDRR intends to require all RRTC applicants to meet the
requirements of the General Rehabilitation Research and Training
Centers (RRTC) Requirements priority that it published in a notice of
final priorities in the Federal Register on February 1, 2008 (72 FR
6132). Additional information on the RRTC program can be found at:
https://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-program.html#RRTC.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements of RRTCs
RRTCs must--
Carry out coordinated advanced programs of rehabilitation
research;
Provide training, including graduate, pre-service, and in-
service training, to help rehabilitation personnel more effectively
provide rehabilitation services to individuals with disabilities;
Provide technical assistance to individuals with
disabilities, their representatives, providers, and other interested
parties;
Disseminate informational materials to individuals with
disabilities, their representatives, providers, and other interested
parties; and
Serve as centers of national excellence in rehabilitation
research for individuals with disabilities, their representatives,
providers, and other interested parties.
Applicants for RRTC grants also must demonstrate in their
applications how they will address, in whole or in part, the needs of
individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(b)(2).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority: This notice contains one proposed priority.
Employer Practices Related to Employment Outcomes Among Individuals
With Disabilities
Background
Individuals with disabilities experience lower rates of employment
than those without disabilities, and this disparity in employment rates
is seen across all sociodemographic groups (Steinmetz, 2006; U.S.
Census Bureau, 2006; U.S. Department of Labor, 2009).
This disparity in employment rates, as well as differences in other
aspects of employment (e.g., retention rates, job satisfaction, wages),
appear to reflect, at least in part, differences in employer practices
related to hiring, promoting, and retaining employees who have or
acquire disabilities (U.S. Department of Labor, 2009). While it is
difficult to obtain employer-level information, there is some recent
evidence regarding the relationship between employer practices and
outcomes for individuals with disabilities. In 2008, the Office of
Disability Employment Policy of the U.S. Department of Labor funded an
employer survey that examined employer practices related to hiring,
advancing, and retaining employees with disabilities (U.S. Department
of Labor, 2009). The study indicated that
[[Page 2121]]
companies reporting that they actively recruit employees with
disabilities differ from other companies in several domains. For
example, companies that recruited individuals with disabilities were
generally less likely than others to identify challenges in hiring
individuals with disabilities (e.g., accommodation costs, nature of the
work, concern about health care costs) and were more likely to identify
strategies that were helpful in recruiting employees with disabilities
(e.g., developing a targeted recruitment program, visible top
management commitment, providing flexible work schedules). In addition,
companies that reported actively recruiting employees with disabilities
were less likely to have identified the following concerns regarding
hiring individuals with disabilities: That employing workers with
disabilities increased the cost of doing business, that workers with
disabilities lack relevant skills and experience, and that employees
with disabilities posed greater risks to safety and productivity.
Analysis of the responses revealed that employer characteristics,
including company size, sector of the economy, and industry type, were
related to the employers' responses. Larger employers and employers in
the public sector were more likely than other employers to report
employing individuals with disabilities and actively recruiting
applicants with disabilities. Larger companies were also more likely to
report having hired employees with disabilities within the last 12
months. Smaller and medium-sized companies were more likely to report
that health care costs, workers compensation costs, and fear of
litigation were challenges in hiring individuals with disabilities.
When asked about concerns related to hiring employees with
disabilities, smaller and medium-sized companies were more likely to
cite concerns about costs of employing individuals with disabilities
and the belief that workers with disabilities lack relevant skills and
experience. In contrast, larger companies were more concerned about
supervisors' uncertainty regarding how to take disciplinary action
against employees with disabilities. When questioned about perceived
challenges to retaining employees with disabilities, smaller companies
expressed greater concerns about the cost of health care coverage and
workers compensation.
Responses also varied by organization type. Companies in
construction, goods-producing, and retail trades were more likely than
others to indicate that the nature of the work was a challenge in
hiring individuals with disabilities. Public organizations were more
likely than private sector agencies to report that they actively
recruited employees with disabilities.
The results of this study suggest that organizations of different
sizes, and from different industries and sectors of the economy, differ
in employer practices with regard to individuals with disabilities.
However, these findings are largely based on the attitudes, opinions or
perceptions of employers, rather than on objectively measured employer
practices and employment outcomes. Building upon these findings by
obtaining empirical data about actual employer practices, and further
investigating the extent to which these practices are associated with
employment for individuals with disabilities, would inform the
development of interventions to improve the number and diversity of
employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities.
References
Steinmetz, E. (2006). Americans With Disabilities: 2002. Household
Economic Studies Current Population Reports P70-107 Washington, DC:
U.S. Census Bureau. See https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disability/sipp/disable02.html.
U.S. Census Bureau (2006). American Community Survey table B1802:
Selected Economic Characteristics for the Civilian
Noninstitutionalized Population By Disability Status. Washington,
DC: U.S. Census Bureau. See https://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-qr_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_S1802&-geo_id=01000US&-ds_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_&-_lang=en&-format=&-CONTEXT=st.
U.S. Department of Labor (2009). Survey of Employer Perspectives on
the Employment of People with Disabilities. See https://www.dol.gov/odep/categories/research/index.htm.
U.S. Department of Labor (2009). Labor force statistics from the
Current Population Survey: Employment status and disability status,
January 2009. See https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsdisability_012009.htm.
Proposed Priority
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a priority for a Rehabilitation Research and Training
Center (RRTC) on Employer Practices Related to Employment Outcomes
Among Individuals with Disabilities. This RRTC must conduct research
that contributes to our knowledge about the differences that exist in
employer practices towards hiring individuals with disabilities and the
relationship between different practices and employment outcomes for
individuals with disabilities. This new knowledge will contribute to
more targeted interventions to improve employer practices related to
the employment of individuals with disabilities. Under this priority,
the RRTC must contribute to the following outcomes:
(a) New knowledge of specific employer practices most strongly
associated with desired employment outcomes for individuals with
disabilities and the prevalence of these practices. The RRTC must
contribute to this outcome by identifying and categorizing employer
practices related to the hiring, retention, and advancement of
individuals with disabilities and conducting research on the extent to
which employers engage in specific practices that have been found in
relevant research to promote positive employment outcomes for
individuals with disabilities. Factors that are associated with such
practices include, but are not limited to: employer size, geographic
regions, sector of industry or the economy (e.g., private sector,
public sector, goods-producing, service-producing), employer
preconceptions, and experience working with vocational rehabilitation
agencies.
(b) Increased knowledge about how these practices relate to
employer success in hiring, retention, and promotion of individuals
with disabilities. Applicants must propose strategies to collect
information about these practices and outcomes directly from employers,
taking into account that it can be difficult to collect information
about employer practices and outcomes. In addition, applicants are
encouraged to use existing databases such as those maintained by the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Small Business
Administration, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, and
disability insurance providers.
(c) Increased incorporation of findings into practice and policy.
The RRTC must contribute to this outcome by:
(1) Collaborating with employer groups to develop, evaluate, or
implement strategies to increase utilization of positive practices
identified by the RRTC.
(2) Conducting training and dissemination activities to facilitate
the utilization of research findings in employment and policy settings.
In addition, this RRTC must collaborate with:
(1) Relevant Rehabilitation Services
Administration grantees, such as the 10 regional Technical
Assistance and Continuing Education projects.
(2) Relevant grantees and programs in the Department of Labor,
including the Office of Disability Employment
[[Page 2122]]
Policy's National Technical Assistance, Policy, and Research Center for
Employers.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority: We will announce the final priority in a notice in
the Federal Register. We will determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and other information available to
the Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this proposed regulatory
action.
The potential costs associated with this proposed regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this proposed regulatory action, we have determined
that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the costs.
Discussion of Costs and Benefits
The benefits of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Programs have been well established over the years in that
similar projects have been completed successfully. This proposed
priority will generate new knowledge through research and development
activities.
Another benefit of this proposed priority is that the establishment
of a new RRTC will support the research and will improve the lives of
individuals with disabilities. The new RRTC will generate, disseminate,
and promote the use of new information that will improve the options
for individuals with disabilities to obtain, retain, and advance in
employment.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll-free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: January 8, 2010.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-480 Filed 1-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P