In the Matter of Certain MEMS Devices and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 449-450 [E9-31360]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 5, 2010 / Notices
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 29, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–31246 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–700]
In the Matter of Certain MEMS Devices
and Products Containing Same; Notice
of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 1, 2009, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Analog
Devices, Inc. of Norwood,
Massachusetts. A supplement to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Jan 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
complaint was filed on December 9,
2009. An amendment to the complaint
was filed on December 22, 2009. The
amended complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain MEMS devices and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 7,220,614 and 7,364,942.
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, are available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
A. Murray, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–2734.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
December 30, 2009, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain MEMS devices or
products containing same that infringe
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
449
one or more of claims 12, 15, 31, 32, 34,
35, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent No.
7,220,614 and claims 1–6 and 8 of U.S.
Patent No. 7,364,942, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Analog
Devices, Inc., One Technology Way,
P.O. Box 9106, Norwood, MA 02062–
9106.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Knowles Electronics LLC, 1151
Maplewood Drive, Itasca, IL 60143.
Mouser Electronics, Inc., 1000 North
Main Street, Mansfield, TX 76063.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Lisa A. Murray, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
450
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 5, 2010 / Notices
Issued: December 31, 2009.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–31360 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Comment Request for Information
Collection for Work Application/Job
Order Recordkeeping (OMB 1205–
0001), Extension Without Revisions
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the
Employment and Training
Administration is soliciting comments
concerning the collection of data
concerning the extension without
changes of the data retention required
by 20 CFR 652.8(d)(5) of the WagnerPeyser Act, which requires each state to
retain applications and job orders for a
minimum of one year. The current
expiration date for this information
collection request is May 31, 2010.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the office listed below in
the addressee section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee’s section below on or before
March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training
Administration, Division of Adult
Services, Attention: Adriana Kaplan,
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room
Jkt 220001
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
II. Review Focus:
AGENCY: Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
16:41 Jan 04, 2010
Dated: December 30, 2009.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–31263 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
Currently, the Employment and
Training Administration is soliciting
comments concerning the proposed
extension/reinstatement of the data
retention required by 20 CFR 652.8(d)(5)
of the Wagner-Peyser Act, which
requires each state to retain applications
and job orders for a minimum of one
year.
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
S4209, Washington, DC 20210.
Telephone number: 202–693–3740 (this
is not a toll-free number). Fax: 202–693–
3587. E-mail: Kaplan.Adriana@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background:
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
The Department of Labor is
particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
III. Current Actions:
Type of Review: Extension without
changes.
Title: Work Application/Job Orders
Record.
OMB Number: 1205–0001.
Affected Public: State Governments.
Total Respondents: 52.
Citation or Form: 20 CFR 652.8(d)(5).
Frequency: On occasion.
Total Responses: Variable depending
on number of job orders and work
applications.
Average Time per Response: Variable.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 8
hours per state or 416.
Total Burden Cost for Respondents: 0.
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information
collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed revision of the
‘‘National Longitudinal Survey of Youth
1997.’’ A copy of the proposed
information collection request (ICR) can
be obtained by contacting the individual
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section below on or before
March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Carol
Rowan, BLS Clearance Officer, Division
of Management Systems, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Room 4080, 2
Massachusetts Avenue, NE.,
Washington, DC 20212, 202–691–7628
(this is not a toll free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carol Rowan, BLS Clearance Officer,
202–691–7628. (See ADDRESSES section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Longitudinal Survey of
Youth 1997 (NLSY97) is a nationally
representative sample of persons who
were born in the years 1980 to 1984.
These respondents were ages 12–17
when the first round of annual
interviews began in 1997; the fourteenth
round of annual interviews will be
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 449-450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-31360]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-700]
In the Matter of Certain MEMS Devices and Products Containing
Same; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on December 1, 2009, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Analog Devices, Inc. of Norwood, Massachusetts. A supplement to the
complaint was filed on December 9, 2009. An amendment to the complaint
was filed on December 22, 2009. The amended complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain MEMS devices and products containing same
by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
7,220,614 and 7,364,942. The complaint further alleges that an industry
in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, are available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary,
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa A. Murray, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202) 205-2734.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on December 30, 2009, Ordered That--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain MEMS devices
or products containing same that infringe one or more of claims 12, 15,
31, 32, 34, 35, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 7,220,614 and claims 1-6
and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,364,942, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: Analog Devices, Inc., One Technology Way,
P.O. Box 9106, Norwood, MA 02062-9106.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Knowles Electronics LLC, 1151 Maplewood Drive, Itasca, IL 60143.
Mouser Electronics, Inc., 1000 North Main Street, Mansfield, TX 76063.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Lisa A. Murray, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease
[[Page 450]]
and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: December 31, 2009.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-31360 Filed 1-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P