Volvo Cars of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 69376-69377 [E9-31079]
Download as PDF
69376
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 250 / Thursday, December 31, 2009 / Notices
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Stay petitions must be
filed by January 9, 2010 (7 days before
the exemption becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34554 (Sub-No. 12), must be
filed with the Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001. In addition, a copy of
each pleading must be served on Mack
H. Shumate, Jr., Senior General
Attorney, Union Pacific Railroad
Company, 101 North Wacker Drive,
Room #1920, Chicago, IL 60606.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at ‘‘https://
www.stb.dot.gov.’’
Decided: December 23, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–30880 Filed 12–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35328]
The Indiana Rail Road Company—
Trackage Rights Exemption—CSX
Transportation, Inc.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to a written supplemental
trackage rights agreement dated
December 1, 2009 (Second
Supplemental Agreement), CSX
Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), has agreed
to broaden the existing non-exclusive,
limited overhead trackage rights granted
to The Indiana Rail Road Company
(INRD) over CSXT’s line of railroad
between the connection of CSXT and
INRD trackage at Sullivan, IN, at
approximately CSXT milepost OZA
204.5, and the connection between
CSXT’s line and tracks leading to the
Oaktown Fuels Mine No. 1 LLC loading
facility at Oaktown, IN (Oaktown Mine),
at approximately CSXT milepost OZA
219.05, a distance of approximately 14.5
miles (Line).1 According to INRD, the
1 INRD states that Second Supplemental
Agreement modifies the original trackage rights
previously granted to INRD in The Indiana Rail
Road Company—Amended Trackage Rights
Exemption—CSX Transportation, Inc., STB Finance
Docket No. 35137 (STB served May 22, 2008),
which pertains to CSXT’s grant of non-exclusive,
limited local trackage rights to INRD between
milepost OZA 204.5 and OZA 214.5, and first
supplemented in The Indiana Rail Road
Company—Trackage Rights Exemption—CSX
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Dec 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
purpose of the transaction is to broaden
the use INRD can make of its existing
trackage rights over the Line, permitting
INRD to use the trackage rights to move
loaded coal trains and empty hopper
trains between: (1) The Oaktown Mine
and Duke Energy’s Wabash River
generating station near Terre Haute, IN,
and Hoosier Energy’s Merom generating
station at Merom, IN; and (2) the
Sunrise Mine at Carlisle, IN, and the
Wabash River generating station and
Indianapolis Power & Light’s generating
station at Petersburg, IN. INRD states
that the broadened trackage rights will
contribute to the economy and
efficiency of operations by permitting
INRD to serve the Merom and Wabash
River generating stations from the mines
in single-line service, and to serve the
Petersburg generating station in
interline service.2
The transaction is scheduled to be
consummated on or after January 15,
2010, the effective date of the exemption
(30 days after the exemption was filed).
As a condition to this exemption, any
employees affected by the acquisition of
the trackage rights will be protected by
the conditions imposed in Norfolk and
Western Ry. Co.—Trackage Rights—BN,
354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified in
Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.—Lease and
Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).
This notice is filed under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(7). If it contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction. Stay
petitions must be filed by January 8,
2010 (at least 7 days before the
exemption becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35328, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on John
Broadley, John H. Broadley &
Associates, P.C., 1054 31st Street, NW.,
Suite 200, Washington, DC 20007.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at ‘‘https://
www.stb.dot.gov.’’
Decided: December 23, 2009.
Transportation, Inc., STB Finance Docket No.
35287 (STB served Sep. 2, 2009), which pertains to
CSXT’s grant of non-exclusive, limited overhead
trackage rights to INRD between milepost OZA
204.5 and OZA 219.05.
2 INRD will interchange with the Indiana
Southern Railroad Company (ISRR) at Beehunter,
IN, and ISRR will deliver the coal to Petersburg.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–30895 Filed 12–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0167; Notice 2]
Volvo Cars of North America, LLC,
Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Volvo Cars of North America, LLC
(Volvo), has determined that certain
model year 2003–2009 multipurpose
passenger vehicles (MPV) did not fully
comply with paragraphs S4.4.2(a) and
4.4.2(c) of 49 CFR 571.110, Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 110, Tire Selection and Rims for
Motor Vehicles With a GVWR of 4,536
Kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less.
Volvo has filed an appropriate report
pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and the rule implementing
those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556,
Volvo has petitioned for an exemption
from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301
on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period, on November 17, 2008
in the Federal Register (73 FR 67926).
No comments were received.
To view the petition and all
supporting documents log onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the
online search instructions to locate
docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2008–0167.’’
For further information on this
decision, contact Mr. John Finneran,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–0645, facsimile (202) 366–
7097.
Affected are approximately 201,914
model years 2003–2009 XC90 MPV
manufactured from August 5, 2002
through March 28, 2008, and 14,147
model years 2008–2009 XC70 MPV
manufactured from May 21, 2007
through March 28, 2008. Paragraphs
S4.4.2(a) and 4.4.2(c) of FMVSS No. 110
require in pertinent part:
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 250 / Thursday, December 31, 2009 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
S4.4.2. Rim markings for vehicles other
than passenger cars. Each rim or, at the
option of the manufacturer in the case of a
single-piece wheel, each wheel disc shall be
marked with the information listed in
S4.4.2(a) through (e), in lettering not less
than 3 millimeters in height, impressed to a
depth, or at the option of the manufacturer,
embossed to a height of not less than 0.125
millimeters. The information listed in
S4.4.2(a) through (c) shall appear on the
outward side. In the case of rims of multipiece construction, the information listed in
S4.4.2(a) through (e) shall appear on the rim
base and the information listed in S4.4.2(b)
and (d) shall also appear on each other part
of the rim.
(a) A designation that indicates the source
of the rim’s published nominal dimensions,
as follows:
(1) ‘‘T’’ indicates The Tire and Rim
Association.
(2) ‘‘E’’ indicates The European Tyre and
Rim Technical Organization.
(3) ‘‘J’’ indicates Japan Automobile Tire
Manufacturers Association, Inc.
(4) ‘‘L’’ indicates ABPA (Brazil), a.k.a.
Associacao Latino Americana De Pneus E
Aros.
(5) ‘‘F’’ indicates Tire and Rim Engineering
Data Committee of South Africa (Tredco).
(6) ‘‘S’’ indicates Scandinavian Tire and
Rim Organization (STRO).
(7) ‘‘A’’ indicates The Tyre and Rim
Association of Australia.
(8) ‘‘I’’ indicates Indian Tyre Technical
Advisory Committee (ITTAC).
(9) ‘‘R’’ indicates Argentine Institute of
Rationalization of Materials, a.k.a. Instituto
Argentino de Racionalizacion de Materiales,
(ARAM).
(10) ‘‘N’’ indicates an independent listing
pursuant to S4.1 of Sec. 571.139 or S5.1(a) of
Sec. 571.119 * * *
(c) The symbol DOT, constituting a
certification by the manufacturer of the rim
that the rim complies with all applicable
Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
In its petition, Volvo described the
noncompliance as the omission of two
markings from the subject vehicles’
wheels, the certification symbol
(‘‘DOT’’) and the designation symbol (in
this case ‘‘E’’) which indicates the
source of the rims’ published nominal
dimensions.
Volvo argues that this noncompliance
is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety for the following reasons: apart
from S4.4.2(a) and S4.4.2(c), the subject
rims contain all information required
within FMVSS No. 110; the tires and
rims of the affected vehicles are
properly matched, and are appropriate
for the load-carrying characteristics of
these vehicles; the information on the
wheel provides users with the
information necessary to ensure that the
wheel is mounted on the appropriate
vehicle; and the omission of the ‘‘DOT–
E’’ stamping will not result in
misapplication of the wheels. Also, the
rim markings and vehicle labeling,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Dec 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
which are used to identify the correct
replacement rim, both contain the
correct and complete size of rims
installed on the subject vehicles.
Volvo stated that it is unaware of any
accidents or injuries or customer
complaints related to the lack of these
markings and that the missing markings
do not affect the performance of the
wheels or the tire and wheel assemblies.
In addition, Volvo states that it has
corrected the problem that caused these
errors so that they will not be repeated
in future production and that it believes
that because the noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety
that no corrective action is warranted.
NHTSA Decision
The purpose of the labeling
requirements in paragraphs S4.4.2(a)
and S4.4.2(c) of FMVSS No. 110 is to
provide safe operation of vehicles by
ensuring that vehicles are equipped
with rims of appropriate size and type
designation mounted with compatible
tires of appropriate size and load rating.
The purpose of the ‘‘DOT’’ marking is
to certify that the rims comply with all
applicable standards, the failure to mark
rims with a DOT symbol is considered
a violation of 49 U.S.C. 30115,
Certification, which does not require
notification or remedy. Consequently,
that portion of Volvo’s
inconsequentiality petition is moot.
While NHTSA strongly encourages
manufacturers to include the
designation symbol required by
S4.4.2(a), its omission does not prevent
the proper matching of tires and rims in
this unique situation because sufficient
information about rim size is available
from other markings on the rims as well
as information available from the
certification label required by 49 CFR
Part 567 and the vehicle placard (tire
information label) required by FMVSS
No. 110 that are present on the affected
vehicles. In addition, the omitted
marking does not affect the ability to
identify the rims in the event of recall
and is not likely to have any affect on
motor vehicle safety.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that Volvo has met
its burden of persuasion that the failure
to provide the designation symbol, as
required by paragraph S4.4.2(a) of
FMVSS No. 110, is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
Volvo’s application is granted, and it is
exempted from providing the
notification of noncompliance that is
required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and from
remedying the noncompliance, as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30120.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69377
501.8 otherwise required by the subject
noncompliance.
Issued on: December 23, 2009.
Claude Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E9–31079 Filed 12–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
December 24, 2009.
The Department of the Treasury will
submit the following public information
collection requirement to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 on or after the date
of publication of this notice. Copies of
this submission may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding this
information collection should be
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed
and to the Treasury PRA Clearance
Officer, Department of the Treasury,
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite
11010, Washington, DC 20220.
Dates: Written comments should be
received on or before February 1, 2010
to be assured of consideration.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
OMB Number: 1545–0115.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Miscellaneous Income.
Form: 1099–MISC.
Description: Form 1099–MISC is used
by payers to report payments of $600 or
more of rents, prizes and awards,
medical and health care payments,
nonemployee compensation, and crop
insurance proceeds, $10 or more of
royalties, any amount of fishing boat
proceeds, certain substitute payments,
golden parachute payments, and an
indication of direct sales of $5,000 or
more.
Respondents: Businesses or other forprofits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
24,639,062 hours.
OMB Number: 1545–0160.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Annual Information Return of
Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner.
Form: 3520–A.
Description: Section 6048(b) requires
that foreign trusts with at least one U.S.
beneficiary must file an annual
information return on Form 3520–A.
The form is used to report the income
and deductions of the foreign trust and
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 250 (Thursday, December 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69376-69377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-31079]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2008-0167; Notice 2]
Volvo Cars of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision
of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Volvo Cars of North America, LLC (Volvo), has determined that
certain model year 2003-2009 multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPV) did
not fully comply with paragraphs S4.4.2(a) and 4.4.2(c) of 49 CFR
571.110, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire
Selection and Rims for Motor Vehicles With a GVWR of 4,536 Kilograms
(10,000 pounds) or Less. Volvo has filed an appropriate report pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, Volvo has petitioned
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the
petition was published, with a 30-day public comment period, on
November 17, 2008 in the Federal Register (73 FR 67926). No comments
were received.
To view the petition and all supporting documents log onto the
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ``NHTSA-2008-0167.''
For further information on this decision, contact Mr. John
Finneran, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-0645,
facsimile (202) 366-7097.
Affected are approximately 201,914 model years 2003-2009 XC90 MPV
manufactured from August 5, 2002 through March 28, 2008, and 14,147
model years 2008-2009 XC70 MPV manufactured from May 21, 2007 through
March 28, 2008. Paragraphs S4.4.2(a) and 4.4.2(c) of FMVSS No. 110
require in pertinent part:
[[Page 69377]]
S4.4.2. Rim markings for vehicles other than passenger cars.
Each rim or, at the option of the manufacturer in the case of a
single-piece wheel, each wheel disc shall be marked with the
information listed in S4.4.2(a) through (e), in lettering not less
than 3 millimeters in height, impressed to a depth, or at the option
of the manufacturer, embossed to a height of not less than 0.125
millimeters. The information listed in S4.4.2(a) through (c) shall
appear on the outward side. In the case of rims of multi-piece
construction, the information listed in S4.4.2(a) through (e) shall
appear on the rim base and the information listed in S4.4.2(b) and
(d) shall also appear on each other part of the rim.
(a) A designation that indicates the source of the rim's
published nominal dimensions, as follows:
(1) ``T'' indicates The Tire and Rim Association.
(2) ``E'' indicates The European Tyre and Rim Technical
Organization.
(3) ``J'' indicates Japan Automobile Tire Manufacturers
Association, Inc.
(4) ``L'' indicates ABPA (Brazil), a.k.a. Associacao Latino
Americana De Pneus E Aros.
(5) ``F'' indicates Tire and Rim Engineering Data Committee of
South Africa (Tredco).
(6) ``S'' indicates Scandinavian Tire and Rim Organization
(STRO).
(7) ``A'' indicates The Tyre and Rim Association of Australia.
(8) ``I'' indicates Indian Tyre Technical Advisory Committee
(ITTAC).
(9) ``R'' indicates Argentine Institute of Rationalization of
Materials, a.k.a. Instituto Argentino de Racionalizacion de
Materiales, (ARAM).
(10) ``N'' indicates an independent listing pursuant to S4.1 of
Sec. 571.139 or S5.1(a) of Sec. 571.119 * * *
(c) The symbol DOT, constituting a certification by the
manufacturer of the rim that the rim complies with all applicable
Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
In its petition, Volvo described the noncompliance as the omission
of two markings from the subject vehicles' wheels, the certification
symbol (``DOT'') and the designation symbol (in this case ``E'') which
indicates the source of the rims' published nominal dimensions.
Volvo argues that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety for the following reasons: apart from S4.4.2(a) and
S4.4.2(c), the subject rims contain all information required within
FMVSS No. 110; the tires and rims of the affected vehicles are properly
matched, and are appropriate for the load-carrying characteristics of
these vehicles; the information on the wheel provides users with the
information necessary to ensure that the wheel is mounted on the
appropriate vehicle; and the omission of the ``DOT-E'' stamping will
not result in misapplication of the wheels. Also, the rim markings and
vehicle labeling, which are used to identify the correct replacement
rim, both contain the correct and complete size of rims installed on
the subject vehicles.
Volvo stated that it is unaware of any accidents or injuries or
customer complaints related to the lack of these markings and that the
missing markings do not affect the performance of the wheels or the
tire and wheel assemblies.
In addition, Volvo states that it has corrected the problem that
caused these errors so that they will not be repeated in future
production and that it believes that because the noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety that no corrective action is
warranted.
NHTSA Decision
The purpose of the labeling requirements in paragraphs S4.4.2(a)
and S4.4.2(c) of FMVSS No. 110 is to provide safe operation of vehicles
by ensuring that vehicles are equipped with rims of appropriate size
and type designation mounted with compatible tires of appropriate size
and load rating.
The purpose of the ``DOT'' marking is to certify that the rims
comply with all applicable standards, the failure to mark rims with a
DOT symbol is considered a violation of 49 U.S.C. 30115, Certification,
which does not require notification or remedy. Consequently, that
portion of Volvo's inconsequentiality petition is moot.
While NHTSA strongly encourages manufacturers to include the
designation symbol required by S4.4.2(a), its omission does not prevent
the proper matching of tires and rims in this unique situation because
sufficient information about rim size is available from other markings
on the rims as well as information available from the certification
label required by 49 CFR Part 567 and the vehicle placard (tire
information label) required by FMVSS No. 110 that are present on the
affected vehicles. In addition, the omitted marking does not affect the
ability to identify the rims in the event of recall and is not likely
to have any affect on motor vehicle safety.
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that Volvo has
met its burden of persuasion that the failure to provide the
designation symbol, as required by paragraph S4.4.2(a) of FMVSS No.
110, is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, Volvo's
application is granted, and it is exempted from providing the
notification of noncompliance that is required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and
from remedying the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8 otherwise required by the subject
noncompliance.
Issued on: December 23, 2009.
Claude Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E9-31079 Filed 12-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P