National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)-Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program-Disability Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP)-Transition to Employment, 68808-68811 [E9-30670]
Download as PDF
68808
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 29, 2009 / Notices
Appendix to 18–11–01
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT CATEGORIES OF
RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM AND RECORD SOURCE
CATEGORIES:
Data provided to the Department as a
result of computer matching with other
Federal agencies is added during CPS
processing. These computer matches are
with the SSA to verify the SSNs, U.S.
citizenship status and date of death (if
applicable) of applicants, and
dependent applicants’ parents, pursuant
to sections 428B(f)(2), 483(a)(12), and
484(g) and (p) of the HEA (20 U.S.C.
1078–2(f)(2), 1090(a)(12), and 1091(g)
and (p)); the VA to verify the status of
applicants who claim to be veterans,
pursuant to section 480(c) and (d)(1)(D)
of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1087vv(c) and
(d)(1)(D)); the SSS to confirm the
registration status of male applicants,
pursuant to section 484(n) of the HEA
(20 U.S.C. 1091(n)); the DHS to confirm
the immigration status of applicants for
assistance as authorized by section
484(g) of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1091(g));
the DOJ to enforce any requirement
imposed at the discretion of a court,
pursuant to section 5301 of the AntiDrug Abuse Act of 1988, Public Law
100–690, as amended by section 1002(d)
of the Crime Control Act of 1990, Public
Law 101–647 (21 U.S.C. 862), denying
Federal benefits under the programs
established by Title IV of the HEA to
any individual convicted of a State or
Federal offense for the distribution or
possession of a controlled substance;
and the DOD to identify dependents of
U.S. military personnel who died in
service in Iraq and Afghanistan after
September 11, 2001 to determine if they
are eligible for increased amounts of
Title IV, HEA program assistance,
pursuant to sections 420R and 473(b) of
the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1070h and
1087mm(b)).
During CPS processing, the
Department’s COD system sends
information to this system for students
who have received a Federal Pell Grant.
The CPS uses this information for
verification analysis and for end-of-year
reporting. This data includes, but is not
limited to: Verification Selection and
Status, Potential Over-award Project
(POP) indicator, School Cost of
Attendance, Reporting and Attended
Campus Pell ID and Enrollment Date,
and Federal Pell Grant Program
information (Scheduled Federal Pell
Grant Award, Origination Award
Amount, Total Accepted Disbursement
Amount, Number of Disbursements
Accepted, Percentage of Eligibility Used
At This Attended Campus Institution,
and Date of Last Activity from the
Origination or Disbursement table).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:02 Dec 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
CPS also receives applicant data from
the Department’s NSLDS System each
time an application is processed or
corrected. This process assesses student
aid eligibility, updates financial aid
history, and ensures compliance with
Title IV, HEA regulations. Some of this
data appears on the applicant’s SAR and
ISIR. Title IV, HEA award information is
provided to NSLDS from several
different sources. Federal Perkins Loan
data and Federal Supplemental
Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG)
overpayment data is sent from
postsecondary institutions or their
third-party servicers; the Department’s
COD system provides Federal Pell Grant
and Direct Loan data; State and
Guaranty Agencies provide data on
FFEL loans received from lending
institutions participating in the FFEL
programs.
Financial aid transcript data reported
by NSLDS provides applicants,
postsecondary institutions and thirdparty servicers with information about
the type(s), amount(s), dates and
overpayment status of prior and current
Title IV, HEA funds the applicant
received. FFEL and William D. Ford
Federal Direct Student Loan (DL) data
reported by NSLDS includes, but is not
limited to: (1) Aggregate Loan Data, such
as: Subsidized, Unsubsidized and
Combined Outstanding Principal
Balances, Unallocated Consolidated
Outstanding Principal Balances,
Subsidized, Unsubsidized and
Combined Pending Disbursements,
Subsidized, Unsubsidized and
Combined Totals, and Unallocated
Consolidated Total; (2) Detail Loan Data,
such as: Loan Sequence Number, Loan
Type Code, Loan Change Flag, Loan
Program Code, Current Status Code and
Date, Outstanding Principal Balance and
Date, Net Loan Amount, Loan Begin and
End Dates, Amount and Date of Last
Disbursement, Guaranty Agency Code,
School Code, Contact Code and Type,
Grade Level; (3) system flags for:
Additional Unsubsidized Loan,
Capitalized Interest, Defaulted Loan
Change, Discharged Loan Change, Loan
Satisfactory Repayment Change, Active
Bankruptcy Change, Overpayments
Change, Aggregate Loan Change,
Defaulted Loan, Discharged Loan, Loan
Satisfactory Repayment, Active
Bankruptcy, Additional Loans, DL
Master Promissory Note, DL PLUS Loan
Master Promissory Note, Subsidized
Loan Limit, and the Combined Loan
Limit. Federal Perkins Loan data
reported by NSLDS includes, but is not
limited to: Cumulative and Current Year
Disbursement Amounts; flags for
Perkins Loan Change, Defaulted Loan,
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Discharged Loan, Loan Satisfactory
Repayment, Active Bankruptcy,
Additional Loans, and Perkins
Overpayment Flag and Contact (School
or Region). Federal Pell Grant payment
data reported includes, but is not
limited to: Pell Sequence Number, Pell
Attended School Code, Pell Transaction
Number, Last Update Date, Scheduled
Amount, Award Amount, Amount Paid
to Date, Percent Scheduled Award Used,
Pell Payment EFC, Flags for Pell
Verification, Pell Payment Change.
Federal Teacher Education Assistance
for College and Higher Education
(TEACH) Grant Program data includes,
but is not limited to: TEACH Grant
Overpayment Contact, TEACH Grant
Overpayment Flag, and TEACH Grant
Loan Principal Balance, TEACH Grant
Total, Teach Grant change Flag. The
National Science and Mathematics
Access to Retain Talent Grant (SMART
Grant) data includes, but is not limited
to: SMART Grant Overpayment Flag,
SMART Grant Overpayment Contact,
and SMART Grant Change Flag. Iraq
and Afghanistan Service Grants (IASG)
data includes, but is not limited to:
Total Award Amount. Academic
Competitiveness Grant (ACG) data
includes, but is not limited to: ACG
Award Amount, ACG Overpayment
Flag, and ACG Payment Change Flag.
FSEOG data includes, but is not limited
to: Overpayment Flag and contact
information.
The Department obtains and
exchanges information that is included
in this system of records from
postsecondary institutions, third-party
servicers, State agencies and lending
institutions that participate in the FFEL
programs. The eligible entities (above)
register with the SAIG to participate in
the information exchanges specified for
their business processes.
[FR Doc. E9–30691 Filed 12–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)—
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program—
Disability Rehabilitation Research
Project (DRRP)—Transition to
Employment
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.133A–1.
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority for
a DRRP.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 29, 2009 / Notices
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a priority for the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program
administered by NIDRR. Specifically,
this notice proposes a priority for a
DRRP. The Assistant Secretary may use
this priority for a competition in fiscal
year (FY) 2010 and later years. We take
this action to focus research attention on
areas of national need. We intend this
priority to improve rehabilitation
services and outcomes for individuals
with disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before January 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this proposed priority to Donna Nangle,
U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., room 6029,
Potomac Center Plaza (PCP),
Washington, DC 20202–2700.
If you prefer to send your comments
by e-mail, use the following address:
donna.nangle@ed.gov. You must
include the term ‘‘Proposed Priority for
a DRRP on Transition to Employment’’
in the subject line of your electronic
message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Nangle. Telephone: (202) 245–
7462 or by e-mail:
donna.nangle@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of proposed priority is in concert
with NIDRR’s Final Long-Range Plan for
FY 2005–2009 (Plan). The Plan, which
was published in the Federal Register
on February 15, 2006 (71 FR 8165), can
be accessed on the Internet at the
following site: www.ed.gov/about/
offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the
Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve the
quality and utility of disability and
rehabilitation research; (2) foster an
exchange of expertise, information, and
training to facilitate the advancement of
knowledge and understanding of the
unique needs of traditionally
underserved populations; (3) determine
best strategies and programs to improve
rehabilitation outcomes for underserved
populations; (4) identify research gaps;
(5) identify mechanisms of integrating
research and practice; and (6)
disseminate findings.
This notice proposes a priority that
NIDRR intends to use for DRRP
competitions in FY 2010 and possibly
later years. However, nothing precludes
NIDRR from publishing additional
priorities, if needed. Furthermore,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:02 Dec 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
NIDRR is under no obligation to make
an award for this priority. The decision
to make an award will be based on the
quality of applications received and
available funding.
Invitation to Comment:
We invite you to submit comments
regarding this proposed priority. To
ensure that your comments have
maximum effect in developing the
notice of final priority, we urge you to
identify clearly the specific topic that
each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
this proposed priority. Please let us
know of any further ways we could
reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this proposed priority in room
6029, 550 12th Street, SW., Potomac
Center Plaza, Washington, DC, between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC, time, Monday through
Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
DRRP Program
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the DRRP program is to improve the
effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, by developing methods,
procedures, and rehabilitation
technologies that advance a wide range
of independent living and employment
outcomes for individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities. DRRPs
carry out one or more of the following
types of activities, as specified and
defined in 34 CFR 350.13 through
350.19: research, training,
demonstration, development,
dissemination, utilization, and technical
assistance. An applicant for assistance
under this program must demonstrate in
its application how it will address, in
whole or in part, the needs of
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68809
individuals with disabilities from
minority backgrounds (34 CFR
350.40(a)). The approaches an applicant
may take to meet this requirement are
found in 34 CFR 350.40(b). In addition,
NIDRR intends to require all DRRP
applicants to meet the requirements of
the General Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP)
Requirements priority that it published
in a notice of final priorities in the
Federal Register on April 28, 2006 (71
FR 25472).
Additional information on the DRRP
program can be found at: https://
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/resprogram.html#DRRP.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g)
and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority: This notice
contains one proposed priority.
Transition to Employment.
Background:
Only 43 percent of youth with
disabilities are employed during the
period immediately after high school
compared to 63 percent of their peers
without disabilities (Wagner et al.,
2005). In addition, certain populations
of youth with disabilities are at an even
greater risk of experiencing poor
employment outcomes, such as
populations who are African-American,
younger, or female (Coutinho et al.,
2006; Cameto et al., 2003; Fabian, 2007;
Wagner et al., 2005, 2006; Wells et al.,
2003). The type of disability is also
related to the employment outcomes for
youth with disabilities (Cameto et al.,
2003; Wagner et al., 2005, 2006; Wells
et al., 2003). Relative to the general
population of youth with disabilities,
youth with disabilities from
disadvantaged backgrounds (e.g.,
poverty, foster care, involvement in the
juvenile justice system) are at even
greater risk of poor employment
outcomes (Cameto et al., 2003; National
Council on Disability, 2008; Wagner et
al., 2005, 2006; Wells et al., 2003).
Studies of promising practices for
transition-age youth with disabilities
suggest that facilitators of successful
employment outcomes include, but are
not limited to: increasing collaboration
and coordination among providers
serving these youth (Flannery et al.,
2007; Oertle & Trach, 2007; Wittenburg
et al., 2002), encouraging youth
participation in the workforce during
the high school years (Fabian, 2007;
Wittenburg & Maag, 2002), encouraging
participation in postsecondary
education (Flannery et al., 2007;
Weathers et al., 2007), providing workspecific and community participation
support (Garcia-Iriarte et al., 2007), and
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
68810
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 29, 2009 / Notices
involving employers in transition
programs (Fabian, 2007; Garcia-Iriarte et
al., 2007; Rutkowski et al., 2006). Some
of these practices, such as youth
participation in the workplace during
high school and employer participation
in transition programs, have been
developed primarily for particular highrisk groups such as minority youth from
urban areas (e.g., Fabian, 2007; GarciaIriarte et al., 2007).
Many of the promising practices
suggested by this research have been
incorporated into projects supported by
the U.S. Department of Education. Some
projects involving promising practices,
such as inter-agency collaboration,
exposure to work experience, and
community-based training, have been
implemented by State vocational
rehabilitation agencies (U.S. Department
of Education, 2009). Promising practices
like these and others (e.g., studentfocused planning, family involvement,
youth development activities) are also
the focus of several current
demonstration projects funded by the
Rehabilitation Services Administration
of the U.S. Department of Education
(2007).
Despite these efforts, there is still
little scientifically based research
demonstrating the efficacy of many of
these practices and interventions in
improving employment outcomes for
transition-age youth with disabilities,
particularly for those transition-age
youth with disabilities who are at
increased risk for poor employment
outcomes. The knowledge gained from
the identification and evaluation of
effective interventions will provide
policymakers and practitioners with the
evidence they need to justify a broad
application of promising practices in
vocational rehabilitation and
educational settings.
References:
Cameto, R., Marder, C., Wagner, M., &
Cardoso, D. (2003). Youth employment.
NLTS2 Data Brief: A report from the
National Longitudinal Transition Study2, 2, pp. 1–5.
Coutinho, M.J., Owald, D.P., & Best,
A.M. (2006). Differences in outcomes for
female and male students in special
education. Career Development for
Exceptional Individuals, 29, 48–59.
Fabian, E.S. (2007). Urban youth with
disabilities: Factors affecting transition
employment. Rehabilitation Counseling
Bulletin, 50, pp. 130–138.
Flannery, K.B., Slovic, R., Benz, M.R.,
& Levine, E. (2007). Priorities and
changing practices: Vocational
rehabilitation and community colleges
improving workforce development
programs for people with disabilities.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:02 Dec 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 27,
141–151.
Garcia-Iriarte, E., Balcazar, F., &
Taylor-Ritzler, T. (2007). Analysis of
case managers’ support of youth with
disabilities transitioning from school to
work. Journal of Vocational
Rehabilitation, 26, 129–140.
National Council on Disability.
(2008). The Rehabilitation Act:
Outcomes for transition-age youth. See
www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/
2008/publications.htm.
Oertle, K.M., & Trach, J.S. (2007).
Interagency collaboration: The
importance of rehabilitation
professionals’ involvement in transition.
Journal of Rehabilitation, 73, 36–44.
Rutkowski, S., Daston, M., Van
Kuiken, D., & Richle, E. (2006). Project
SEARCH: A demand-side model of high
school transition. Journal of Vocational
Rehabilitation, 25, 85–96.
U.S. Department of Education (2007).
Notice inviting applications. Federal
Register, 72 FR 36682–36685.
U.S. Department of Education (2009).
RSA: Promising practices for basic VR
agencies helping transition age youth.
Washington, DC: Department of
Education. See https://www.ed.gov/
rschstat/eval/rehab/promisingpractices/transition-age/.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R.,
Garza, N., & Levine, P. (2005). After high
school: A first look at the postschool
experiences of youth with disabilities. A
report from the National Longitudinal
Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo
Park, CA: SRI International. Available at
https://www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_04/
nlts2_report_2005_04_complete.pdf.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R.,
Levine, P., & Garza, N. (2006). An
overview of findings from Wave 2 of the
National Longitudinal Transition Study2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI
International. See https://www.nlts2.org/
reports/2006_08/
nlts2_report_2006_08_complete.pdf.
Weathers, R.R., Walter, G., Schley, S.,
Hennessey, J., Hemmeter, J., &
Burkhauser, R.V. (2007). How
postsecondary education improves adult
outcomes for Supplemental Security
Income children with severe hearing
impairments. Social Security Bulletin,
67, 101–131.
Wells, T., Sandefur, G.D., & Hogan,
D.P. (2003). What happens after the high
school years among younger persons
with disabilities? Social Forces, 82,
803–832.
Wittenburg, D.C., Golden, T., &
Fishman, M. (2002). Transition options
for youth with disabilities: An overview
of the programs and policies that affect
transition from school. Journal of
Vocational Rehabilitation, 17, 195–206.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Wittenburg, D.C., & Maag, E. (2002).
School to where? A literature review on
economic outcomes of youth with
disabilities. Journal of Vocational
Rehabilitation, 17, 265–280.
Proposed Priority:
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
proposes a priority for a Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP)
on Transition to Employment. The
purpose of this priority is to identify
and evaluate promising practices that
will facilitate job entry and career
development for transition-age youth
with disabilities who are at risk for poor
employment outcomes.
A number of factors can affect
employment outcomes for this
population, including demographic
characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, age),
disability characteristics (e.g., disability
type) and disadvantaged background
(e.g., poverty, foster care, involvement
in the juvenile justice system). The
DRRP must build upon the current
research literature and ongoing
implementation and demonstration of
promising practices in the field of
transition to employment.
Under this priority, the DRRP must be
designed to contribute to the following
outcomes:
(a) New knowledge of promising
employment-focused transition
practices for transition-age youth with
disabilities who are at risk for poor
employment outcomes. The DRRP must
contribute to this outcome by
conducting research to identify such
practices. These practices may include,
but are not limited to: work experience
during the secondary school years;
involvement of employers in the design
and implementation of the transition
program; supported employment; and
increased coordination among schools,
State vocational rehabilitation programs,
or other programs serving transition-age
youth with disabilities.
(b) New knowledge regarding the
effectiveness of employment-focused
transition practices for transition-age
youth with disabilities at risk for poor
employment outcomes. The DRRP must
contribute to this outcome by
implementing and evaluating at least
one promising practice identified under
paragraph (a) for a particular at-risk
group of transition-age youth with
disabilities. In evaluating the promising
practice or practices, the DRRP must use
scientifically based research, as defined
in section 9101(37) of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965,
as amended (20 U.S.C. 7801(37)).
Applicants must identify the specific atrisk group or groups of transition-age
youth with disabilities they propose to
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 29, 2009 / Notices
study, provide evidence that the
selected population or populations are,
in fact, at risk for poor employment
outcomes, and explain how the
proposed practices are expected to
address the needs of the population or
populations.
(c) Enhancement of the knowledge
base of policy makers, State VR
personnel, and personnel of other
programs serving transition-age youth
with disabilities. The DRRP must
contribute to this outcome by
conducting targeted dissemination of
results from research conducted under
paragraphs (a), and (b).
• In addition, through coordination
with the NIDRR Project Officer, the
DRRP should contribute to this outcome
by:
(1) Collaborating with relevant
technical assistance grantees from the
Rehabilitation Services Administration,
such as the Technical Assistance and
Continuing Education (TACE) Centers;
and
(2) Collaborating with relevant
technical assistance Grantees from the
Office of Special Education Programs,
such as the National Secondary
Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority: We will announce the
final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final
priority after considering responses to
this notice and other information
available to the Department. This notice
does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:02 Dec 28, 2009
Jkt 220001
definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking
requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this proposed regulatory action are
those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this proposed regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
Discussion of costs and benefits:
The benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Programs have been well
established over the years in that similar
projects have been completed
successfully. This proposed priority will
generate new knowledge about
transition to employment for youth with
disabilities, through research,
development, dissemination, utilization,
or technical assistance projects.
Another benefit of this proposed
priority is that the establishment of a
new DRRP will improve the lives of
individuals with disabilities. The new
DRRP will generate, disseminate, and
promote the use of new information
about transition to employment for
youth with disabilities. This
information will improve the options for
youth with disabilities as they transition
into adulthood and employment
activities.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS,
toll- free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68811
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: December 21, 2009.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E9–30670 Filed 12–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: Energy Information
Administration (EIA), Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request.
SUMMARY: The EIA has submitted the Oil
and Gas Reserves System Surveys
package to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and a
three-year extension under section
3507(h)(1) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13) (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq).
DATES: Comments must be filed by
January 28, 2010. If you anticipate that
you will be submitting comments but
find it difficult to do so within that
period, you should contact the OMB
Desk Officer for DOE listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to OMB
Desk Officer for DOE, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget. To
ensure receipt of the comments by the
due date, submission by FAX (202–395–
7285) or e-mail to
Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov is
recommended. The mailing address is
726 Jackson Place, NW., Washington,
DC 20503. The OMB DOE Desk Officer
may be telephoned at (202) 395–4638.
(A copy of your comments should also
be provided to EIA’s Statistics and
Methods Group at the address below.)
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68808-68811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30670]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR)--Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers
Program--Disability Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP)--Transition
to Employment
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.133A-1.
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority for a DRRP.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 68809]]
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services proposes a priority for the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program administered by
NIDRR. Specifically, this notice proposes a priority for a DRRP. The
Assistant Secretary may use this priority for a competition in fiscal
year (FY) 2010 and later years. We take this action to focus research
attention on areas of national need. We intend this priority to improve
rehabilitation services and outcomes for individuals with disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before January 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this proposed priority to Donna
Nangle, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room
6029, Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700.
If you prefer to send your comments by e-mail, use the following
address: donna.nangle@ed.gov. You must include the term ``Proposed
Priority for a DRRP on Transition to Employment'' in the subject line
of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Nangle. Telephone: (202) 245-
7462 or by e-mail: donna.nangle@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of proposed priority is in
concert with NIDRR's Final Long-Range Plan for FY 2005-2009 (Plan). The
Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2006
(71 FR 8165), can be accessed on the Internet at the following site:
www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve
the quality and utility of disability and rehabilitation research; (2)
foster an exchange of expertise, information, and training to
facilitate the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the unique
needs of traditionally underserved populations; (3) determine best
strategies and programs to improve rehabilitation outcomes for
underserved populations; (4) identify research gaps; (5) identify
mechanisms of integrating research and practice; and (6) disseminate
findings.
This notice proposes a priority that NIDRR intends to use for DRRP
competitions in FY 2010 and possibly later years. However, nothing
precludes NIDRR from publishing additional priorities, if needed.
Furthermore, NIDRR is under no obligation to make an award for this
priority. The decision to make an award will be based on the quality of
applications received and available funding.
Invitation to Comment:
We invite you to submit comments regarding this proposed priority.
To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in developing the
notice of final priority, we urge you to identify clearly the specific
topic that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from this proposed
priority. Please let us know of any further ways we could reduce
potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this proposed priority in room 6029, 550 12th Street,
SW., Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30
a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Washington, DC, time, Monday through Friday of each
week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
DRRP Program
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the DRRP program is to improve
the effectiveness of services authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended, by developing methods, procedures, and
rehabilitation technologies that advance a wide range of independent
living and employment outcomes for individuals with disabilities,
especially individuals with the most severe disabilities. DRRPs carry
out one or more of the following types of activities, as specified and
defined in 34 CFR 350.13 through 350.19: research, training,
demonstration, development, dissemination, utilization, and technical
assistance. An applicant for assistance under this program must
demonstrate in its application how it will address, in whole or in
part, the needs of individuals with disabilities from minority
backgrounds (34 CFR 350.40(a)). The approaches an applicant may take to
meet this requirement are found in 34 CFR 350.40(b). In addition, NIDRR
intends to require all DRRP applicants to meet the requirements of the
General Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP)
Requirements priority that it published in a notice of final priorities
in the Federal Register on April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25472).
Additional information on the DRRP program can be found at: https://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-program.html#DRRP.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority: This notice contains one proposed priority.
Transition to Employment.
Background:
Only 43 percent of youth with disabilities are employed during the
period immediately after high school compared to 63 percent of their
peers without disabilities (Wagner et al., 2005). In addition, certain
populations of youth with disabilities are at an even greater risk of
experiencing poor employment outcomes, such as populations who are
African-American, younger, or female (Coutinho et al., 2006; Cameto et
al., 2003; Fabian, 2007; Wagner et al., 2005, 2006; Wells et al.,
2003). The type of disability is also related to the employment
outcomes for youth with disabilities (Cameto et al., 2003; Wagner et
al., 2005, 2006; Wells et al., 2003). Relative to the general
population of youth with disabilities, youth with disabilities from
disadvantaged backgrounds (e.g., poverty, foster care, involvement in
the juvenile justice system) are at even greater risk of poor
employment outcomes (Cameto et al., 2003; National Council on
Disability, 2008; Wagner et al., 2005, 2006; Wells et al., 2003).
Studies of promising practices for transition-age youth with
disabilities suggest that facilitators of successful employment
outcomes include, but are not limited to: increasing collaboration and
coordination among providers serving these youth (Flannery et al.,
2007; Oertle & Trach, 2007; Wittenburg et al., 2002), encouraging youth
participation in the workforce during the high school years (Fabian,
2007; Wittenburg & Maag, 2002), encouraging participation in
postsecondary education (Flannery et al., 2007; Weathers et al., 2007),
providing work-specific and community participation support (Garcia-
Iriarte et al., 2007), and
[[Page 68810]]
involving employers in transition programs (Fabian, 2007; Garcia-
Iriarte et al., 2007; Rutkowski et al., 2006). Some of these practices,
such as youth participation in the workplace during high school and
employer participation in transition programs, have been developed
primarily for particular high-risk groups such as minority youth from
urban areas (e.g., Fabian, 2007; Garcia-Iriarte et al., 2007).
Many of the promising practices suggested by this research have
been incorporated into projects supported by the U.S. Department of
Education. Some projects involving promising practices, such as inter-
agency collaboration, exposure to work experience, and community-based
training, have been implemented by State vocational rehabilitation
agencies (U.S. Department of Education, 2009). Promising practices like
these and others (e.g., student-focused planning, family involvement,
youth development activities) are also the focus of several current
demonstration projects funded by the Rehabilitation Services
Administration of the U.S. Department of Education (2007).
Despite these efforts, there is still little scientifically based
research demonstrating the efficacy of many of these practices and
interventions in improving employment outcomes for transition-age youth
with disabilities, particularly for those transition-age youth with
disabilities who are at increased risk for poor employment outcomes.
The knowledge gained from the identification and evaluation of
effective interventions will provide policymakers and practitioners
with the evidence they need to justify a broad application of promising
practices in vocational rehabilitation and educational settings.
References:
Cameto, R., Marder, C., Wagner, M., & Cardoso, D. (2003). Youth
employment. NLTS2 Data Brief: A report from the National Longitudinal
Transition Study-2, 2, pp. 1-5.
Coutinho, M.J., Owald, D.P., & Best, A.M. (2006). Differences in
outcomes for female and male students in special education. Career
Development for Exceptional Individuals, 29, 48-59.
Fabian, E.S. (2007). Urban youth with disabilities: Factors
affecting transition employment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,
50, pp. 130-138.
Flannery, K.B., Slovic, R., Benz, M.R., & Levine, E. (2007).
Priorities and changing practices: Vocational rehabilitation and
community colleges improving workforce development programs for people
with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 27, 141-151.
Garcia-Iriarte, E., Balcazar, F., & Taylor-Ritzler, T. (2007).
Analysis of case managers' support of youth with disabilities
transitioning from school to work. Journal of Vocational
Rehabilitation, 26, 129-140.
National Council on Disability. (2008). The Rehabilitation Act:
Outcomes for transition-age youth. See www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2008/publications.htm.
Oertle, K.M., & Trach, J.S. (2007). Interagency collaboration: The
importance of rehabilitation professionals' involvement in transition.
Journal of Rehabilitation, 73, 36-44.
Rutkowski, S., Daston, M., Van Kuiken, D., & Richle, E. (2006).
Project SEARCH: A demand-side model of high school transition. Journal
of Vocational Rehabilitation, 25, 85-96.
U.S. Department of Education (2007). Notice inviting applications.
Federal Register, 72 FR 36682-36685.
U.S. Department of Education (2009). RSA: Promising practices for
basic VR agencies helping transition age youth. Washington, DC:
Department of Education. See https://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/rehab/promising-practices/transition-age/.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N., & Levine, P. (2005).
After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth
with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition
Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available at https://www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_04/nlts2_report_2005_04_complete.pdf.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Garza, N. (2006).
An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal
Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. See
https://www.nlts2.org/reports/2006_08/nlts2_report_2006_08_complete.pdf.
Weathers, R.R., Walter, G., Schley, S., Hennessey, J., Hemmeter,
J., & Burkhauser, R.V. (2007). How postsecondary education improves
adult outcomes for Supplemental Security Income children with severe
hearing impairments. Social Security Bulletin, 67, 101-131.
Wells, T., Sandefur, G.D., & Hogan, D.P. (2003). What happens after
the high school years among younger persons with disabilities? Social
Forces, 82, 803-832.
Wittenburg, D.C., Golden, T., & Fishman, M. (2002). Transition
options for youth with disabilities: An overview of the programs and
policies that affect transition from school. Journal of Vocational
Rehabilitation, 17, 195-206.
Wittenburg, D.C., & Maag, E. (2002). School to where? A literature
review on economic outcomes of youth with disabilities. Journal of
Vocational Rehabilitation, 17, 265-280.
Proposed Priority:
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a priority for a Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Project (DRRP) on Transition to Employment. The purpose of
this priority is to identify and evaluate promising practices that will
facilitate job entry and career development for transition-age youth
with disabilities who are at risk for poor employment outcomes.
A number of factors can affect employment outcomes for this
population, including demographic characteristics (e.g., race/
ethnicity, age), disability characteristics (e.g., disability type) and
disadvantaged background (e.g., poverty, foster care, involvement in
the juvenile justice system). The DRRP must build upon the current
research literature and ongoing implementation and demonstration of
promising practices in the field of transition to employment.
Under this priority, the DRRP must be designed to contribute to the
following outcomes:
(a) New knowledge of promising employment-focused transition
practices for transition-age youth with disabilities who are at risk
for poor employment outcomes. The DRRP must contribute to this outcome
by conducting research to identify such practices. These practices may
include, but are not limited to: work experience during the secondary
school years; involvement of employers in the design and implementation
of the transition program; supported employment; and increased
coordination among schools, State vocational rehabilitation programs,
or other programs serving transition-age youth with disabilities.
(b) New knowledge regarding the effectiveness of employment-focused
transition practices for transition-age youth with disabilities at risk
for poor employment outcomes. The DRRP must contribute to this outcome
by implementing and evaluating at least one promising practice
identified under paragraph (a) for a particular at-risk group of
transition-age youth with disabilities. In evaluating the promising
practice or practices, the DRRP must use scientifically based research,
as defined in section 9101(37) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended (20 U.S.C. 7801(37)). Applicants must
identify the specific at-risk group or groups of transition-age youth
with disabilities they propose to
[[Page 68811]]
study, provide evidence that the selected population or populations
are, in fact, at risk for poor employment outcomes, and explain how the
proposed practices are expected to address the needs of the population
or populations.
(c) Enhancement of the knowledge base of policy makers, State VR
personnel, and personnel of other programs serving transition-age youth
with disabilities. The DRRP must contribute to this outcome by
conducting targeted dissemination of results from research conducted
under paragraphs (a), and (b).
In addition, through coordination with the NIDRR Project
Officer, the DRRP should contribute to this outcome by:
(1) Collaborating with relevant technical assistance grantees from
the Rehabilitation Services Administration, such as the Technical
Assistance and Continuing Education (TACE) Centers; and
(2) Collaborating with relevant technical assistance Grantees from
the Office of Special Education Programs, such as the National
Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority: We will announce the final priority in a notice in
the Federal Register. We will determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and other information available to
the Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with this proposed regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this proposed regulatory action, we have determined
that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the costs.
Discussion of costs and benefits:
The benefits of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Programs have been well established over the years in that
similar projects have been completed successfully. This proposed
priority will generate new knowledge about transition to employment for
youth with disabilities, through research, development, dissemination,
utilization, or technical assistance projects.
Another benefit of this proposed priority is that the establishment
of a new DRRP will improve the lives of individuals with disabilities.
The new DRRP will generate, disseminate, and promote the use of new
information about transition to employment for youth with disabilities.
This information will improve the options for youth with disabilities
as they transition into adulthood and employment activities.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll- free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: December 21, 2009.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E9-30670 Filed 12-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P