Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From the People's Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 68253-68254 [E9-30516]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 23, 2009 / Notices
review. Therefore, we find that the rate
is relevant for use in this administrative
review and, therefore, it has probative
value for use as AFA. As such, the
Department finds this rate to be
corroborated to the extent practicable
consistent with section 776(c) of Act.
Therefore, as AFA, we have selected
the rate of $2.63 per kilogram for PRC–
wide entity, the highest margin we
calculated for a respondent in the
immediately preceding administrative
review. We consider the $2.63 per
kilogram rate to be sufficiently high so
as to encourage participation in future
segments of this proceeding.
Preliminary Results of the Review
The Department has determined that
the following preliminary dumping
margins exist for the period December 1,
2007 through November 30, 2008:
HONEY FROM THE PRC
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin (per kilogram)
PRC–wide Entity30 .......
$2.63
30 The
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
PRC-wide entity includes: Anhui Native Produce Import and Export Corp., Inner
Mongolia Youth Trade Development Co., Ltd.,
Qinhuangdao Municipal Dafeng Industrial Co.,
Ltd., and Wuhu Qinshgi Tangye.
Schedule for Final Results of Review
Interested parties may submit case
briefs and/or written comments no later
than 30 days after the date of
publication of these preliminary results
of review. See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to written
comments, limited to issues raised in
such briefs or comments, may be filed
no later than 37 days after the date of
publication of these preliminary results
of review. See 19 CFR 351.309(d). The
Department urges interested parties to
provide an executive summary of each
argument contained within the case
briefs and rebuttal briefs.
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
these preliminary results. See 19 CFR
351.310(c). Requests should contain the
following information: (1) The party’s
name, address, and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral
presentations will be limited to issues
raised in the briefs. If we receive a
request for a hearing, we intend to hold
the hearing seven days after the
deadline for submission of the rebuttal
briefs at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
The Department will issue the final
results of this administrative review,
which will include the results of its
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:26 Dec 22, 2009
Jkt 220001
analysis of issues raised in any such
comments, within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act.
Assessment Rates
Consistent with the Sixth AR Final
Results, we will direct CBP to assess
importer–specific assessment rates
based on the resulting per–unit (i.e., per
kilogram) amount on each entry of the
subject merchandise during the POR.31
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of the final
results of review. If these preliminary
results are adopted in our final results
of review, the Department shall
determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. For assessment purposes, we
calculated importer–specific assessment
rates for honey from the PRC.
Specifically, we divided the total duties
for each importer by the total quantity
of subject merchandise sold to that
importer during the POR to calculate a
per–unit assessment amount. We will
direct CBP to assess importer–specific
assessment rates based on the resulting
per–unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on
each entry of the subject merchandise
during the POR if any importer–specific
assessment rate calculated in the final
results of this review is above de
minimis.
Due to the fact that this review of
Dongtai Peak is preliminarily rescinded,
if this preliminary rescission is adopted
in our final results of review, Dongtai
Peak’s antidumping duties shall be
assessed at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(2).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash–deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results for
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) for subject merchandise
exported by Dongtai Peak the cash
deposit rate will be $0.98 per kilogram;
(2) for Anhui Native, QMD, Inner
Mongolia, Wuhu Qinshgi and all other
PRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate and, thus, are
a part of the PRC–wide entity, the cash–
31 See
PO 00000
Sixth AR Final Results.
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68253
deposit rate will be the PRC–wide rate
of $2.63 per–kilogram; (3) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and non–
PRC exporters not listed above that have
a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter–specific rate
published for the most recent period;
and, (4) for all non–PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash–
deposit rate will be the rate applicable
to the PRC exporter that supplied that
non–PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
This administrative review, and this
notice are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 16, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–30530 Filed 12–22–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–886]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From
the People’s Republic of China:
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene retail carrier bags from the
People’s Republic of China. The period
of review is August 1, 2008, through
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
68254
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 23, 2009 / Notices
Technology Enterprise Co., Ltd.
(Chintec Packaging), requested an
administrative review of the order with
respect to their exports of PRCBs from
the PRC. On September 22, 2009, in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we
published a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the order. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 74 FR 48224 (September 22, 2009).
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Rescission of Review in Part
Background
On August 9, 2004, we published in
the Federal Register an antidumping
duty order on polyethylene retail carrier
bags (PRCBs) from the People’s Republic
of China (PRC). See Antidumping Duty
Order: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags
From the People’s Republic of China, 69
FR 48201 (August 9, 2004). On August
3, 2009, we published in the Federal
Register a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on PRCBs from
the PRC. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 74
FR 38397 (August 3, 2009). On August
31, 2009, pursuant to section 751(a) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b), the
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag
Committee and its individual members,
Hilex Poly Co., LLC, and Superbag
Corporation (collectively, the
petitioners), requested an administrative
review of the order with respect to
Dongguan Nozawa Plastics Products
Co., Ltd., and United Power Packaging,
Ltd. (collectively, Nozawa), exporters of
PRCBs from the PRC. Also on August
31, 2009, pursuant to section 751(a) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(b), Chung
Va Century Macao Commercial Offshore
Ltd. (Chung Va Macao) and Chinese
Factory Zhuhai Chintec Packaging
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
July 31, 2009. The Department is
rescinding this review.
DATES: Effective Date: December 23,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), the Department will
rescind an administrative review, ‘‘in
whole or in part, if a party that
requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the
requested review.’’ We received a notice
of withdrawal from the petitioners with
respect to Nozawa within the 90-day
time limit. See letter from the
petitioners dated November 17, 2009.
Because the Department received no
other requests for review of Nozawa, the
Department is rescinding the review of
the order with respect to Nozawa. We
also received a notice of withdrawal
from Chung Va Macao and Chintec
Packaging within the 90-day limit. See
letter dated November 20, 2009. Because
the Department received no other
requests for review of Chung Va Macao
and Chintec Packaging, the Department
is rescinding the review of the order
with respect to Chung Va Macao and
Chintec Packaging. This rescission is in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
The Department intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of this
notice.
Dated: December 17, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–30516 Filed 12–22–09; 8:45 am]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Dec 22, 2009
Jkt 220001
Notification to Importer
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 09–59]
36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation
Agency, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is
publishing the unclassified text of a
section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification
to fulfill the requirements of section 155
of Public Law 104–164 dated 21 July
1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601–
3740.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a copy of a letter to the
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Transmittal 09–59 with attached
transmittal, policy justification, and
Sensitivity of Technology.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68253-68254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30516]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-886]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From the People's Republic of
China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the
Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier
bags from the People's Republic of China. The period of review is
August 1, 2008, through
[[Page 68254]]
July 31, 2009. The Department is rescinding this review.
DATES: Effective Date: December 23, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3683 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 9, 2004, we published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from
the People's Republic of China (PRC). See Antidumping Duty Order:
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From the People's Republic of China,
69 FR 48201 (August 9, 2004). On August 3, 2009, we published in the
Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on PRCBs from the PRC. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 74 FR
38397 (August 3, 2009). On August 31, 2009, pursuant to section 751(a)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b),
the Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag Committee and its individual
members, Hilex Poly Co., LLC, and Superbag Corporation (collectively,
the petitioners), requested an administrative review of the order with
respect to Dongguan Nozawa Plastics Products Co., Ltd., and United
Power Packaging, Ltd. (collectively, Nozawa), exporters of PRCBs from
the PRC. Also on August 31, 2009, pursuant to section 751(a) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.213(b), Chung Va Century Macao Commercial Offshore Ltd.
(Chung Va Macao) and Chinese Factory Zhuhai Chintec Packaging
Technology Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Chintec Packaging), requested an
administrative review of the order with respect to their exports of
PRCBs from the PRC. On September 22, 2009, in accordance with section
751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of the order. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request
for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 48224 (September 22, 2009).
Rescission of Review in Part
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will
rescind an administrative review, ``in whole or in part, if a party
that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the
date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review.''
We received a notice of withdrawal from the petitioners with respect to
Nozawa within the 90-day time limit. See letter from the petitioners
dated November 17, 2009. Because the Department received no other
requests for review of Nozawa, the Department is rescinding the review
of the order with respect to Nozawa. We also received a notice of
withdrawal from Chung Va Macao and Chintec Packaging within the 90-day
limit. See letter dated November 20, 2009. Because the Department
received no other requests for review of Chung Va Macao and Chintec
Packaging, the Department is rescinding the review of the order with
respect to Chung Va Macao and Chintec Packaging. This rescission is in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). The Department intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
this notice.
Notification to Importer
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 17, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-30516 Filed 12-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
