Certain Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan: Final Results and Final Rescission in Part of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 66620-66621 [E9-29928]
Download as PDF
66620
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 16, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–816]
Certain Stainless Steel Butt–Weld Pipe
Fittings from Taiwan: Final Results and
Final Rescission in Part of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 8, 2009, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
stainless steel butt–weld pipe fittings
from Taiwan. See Certain Stainless Steel
Butt–Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Notice
of Intent to Rescind in Part, and Notice
of Intent Not to Revoke Order in Part,
74 FR 32532 (July 8, 2009) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’). The merchandise covered by
the order is certain stainless steel butt–
weld pipe fittings from Taiwan as
described in the ‘‘Scope of the Order’’
section of this notice. The period of
review (‘‘POR’’) is June 1, 2007, through
May 31, 2008. We provided interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
our Preliminary Results. Based upon our
analysis of the comments received, we
made changes to the margin calculation.
The final weighted–average dumping
margin is listed below in the section
titled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department’s preliminary results
of review were published on July 8,
2009. See Preliminary Results. We
invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. We received a case
brief from the sole respondent, Ta Chen
Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ta Chen’s
Brief’’) on August 10, 2009. We did not
receive any case or rebuttal briefs from
petitioners Flowline Division of
Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., Shaw Alloy
Piping Products, Inc., Core Pipe
(formerly known as Gerlin, Inc.) and
Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:18 Dec 15, 2009
Jkt 220001
Revocation
On June 30, 2008, Ta Chen requested,
under 19 CFR 351.222(b)(2) and (e), that
the antidumping duty order, as it relates
to Ta Chen, be revoked based on the
absence of dumping, and included with
its request certain company
certifications regarding revocation. In
this case, our margin calculation shows
that Ta Chen sold the subject
merchandise at less than normal value
during the current review period.
Additionally, Ta Chen predicates its
request on the assumption that action by
the Court of International Trade will
result in recalculations for the two
immediately preceding administrative
reviews of margins at zero or de
minimis. While we acknowledge that
the Department’s determinations in the
two prior segments of this proceeding
are currently in litigation, there is no
final and conclusive judgment from any
court supporting Ta Chen’s arguments
or invalidating the Department’s
findings in the prior administrative
reviews. See Preliminary Results at
32533–34. Accordingly, we determine,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(b)(2), that
revocation of the order with respect to
Ta Chen is not warranted.
Scope of the Order
The products subject to the order are
certain stainless steel butt–weld pipe
fittings, whether finished or unfinished,
under 14 inches inside diameter.
Certain welded stainless steel butt–weld
pipe fittings (‘‘pipe fittings’’) are used to
connect pipe sections in piping systems
where conditions require welded
connections. The subject merchandise is
used where one or more of the following
conditions is a factor in designing the
piping system: (1) Corrosion of the
piping system will occur if material
other than stainless steel is used; (2)
contamination of the material in the
system by the system itself must be
prevented; (3) high temperatures are
present; (4) extreme low temperatures
are present; and (5) high pressures are
contained within the system. Pipe
fittings come in a variety of shapes, with
the following five shapes the most basic:
‘‘elbows,’’ ‘‘tees,’’ ‘‘reducers,’’ ‘‘stub
ends,’’ and ‘‘caps.’’ The edges of
finished pipe fittings are beveled.
Threaded, grooved, and bolted fittings
are excluded from the order. The pipe
fittings subject to the order are
classifiable under subheading
7307.23.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, our written
description of the scope of the order is
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
dispositive. Pipe fittings manufactured
to American Society of Testing and
Materials specification A774 are
included in the scope of the order.
Partial Rescission of Review
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department issued a notice of intent to
rescind the review with respect to Liang
Feng Stainless Steel Fitting Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Liang Feng’’), Tru–Flow Industrial
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tru–Flow’’), Censor
International Corporation (‘‘Censor’’)
and PFP Taiwan Co., Ltd. (‘‘PFP’’),
because we found they had no entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.
See Preliminary Results at 32533. As the
Department received no comments on
our intent to rescind, we find that
rescission of the review concerning
Liang Feng, Tru–Flow, Censor, and PFP
is appropriate. Therefore, the
Department is rescinding the review
with respect to Liang Feng, Tru–Flow,
Censor, and PFP.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case brief, as
well as the Department’s findings, in
this administrative review are addressed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Certain Stainless Steel Butt–
Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan
(‘‘Decision Memorandum’’), dated
December 7, 2009, which is hereby
adopted by this notice. A list of the
issues raised and to which we have
responded is found in the Decision
Memorandum, appended to this notice.
The Decision Memorandum is on file in
the Central Records Unit in room 1117
of the main Commerce building, and
can also be accessed directly on the Web
at https://ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy
and electronic version of the public
version of the Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we
determine that the following weighted–
average margin exists for the period
June 1, 2007, through May 31, 2008:
Manufacturer
Ta Chen Stainless Pipe
Co., Ltd .....................
Weighted–Average
Margin
0.82 percent
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries,
pursuant to section 751(a)(1)(B) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 16, 2009 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.212(b). The
Department calculated importer–
specific duty assessment rates on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales to the total entered
value of the examined sales for that
importer. Where the assessment rate is
above de minimis, we will instruct CBP
to assess duties on all entries of subject
merchandise manufactured or exported
by Ta Chen. Antidumping duties for the
rescinded companies, Liang Feng, Tru–
Flow, Censor, and PFP, shall be
assessed at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of these final results
of review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification applies to POR entries of
subject merchandise produced by
companies examined in this review (i.e.,
companies for which a dumping margin
was calculated) where the companies
did not know that their merchandise
was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all–
others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of certain stainless steel butt–weld pipe
fittings from Taiwan entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of these final results, as provided
by section 751(a) of the Act: (1) for the
company covered by this review, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate listed
above; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in
this review but covered in the less–thanfair–value investigation or a prior
review, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company–specific
rate from the most recent review; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the less–than-
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:18 Dec 15, 2009
Jkt 220001
fair–value investigation, but the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be
that established for the most recent
period for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will be 51.01 percent, the all–others rate
established in the less–than-fair–value
investigation. These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred, and in the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also is the only reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: December 7, 2009.
Carole A. Showers,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
APPENDIX
Issues in Decision Memorandum
1. Purchased Fittings
2. Calculation of General and
Administrative (‘‘G&A’’) Expenses
3. Ta Chen’s Raw Material and
Conversion Cost Variances
4. Constructed Export Price (‘‘CEP’’)
Offset
5. Basis of Dumping Margin Calculation
6. Calculation of CEP Profit Ratio
[FR Doc. E9–29928 Filed 12–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66621
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign–Trade Zones Board
Docket 54–2009
Foreign–Trade Zone 238 Dublin,
Virginia, Application for Subzone, VF
Corporation (Apparel, Footwear, and
Luggage Distribution), Martinsville,
Virginia
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign–Trade Zones Board (the
Board) by the New River Economic
Development Alliance, Inc., grantee of
FTZ 238, requesting special–purpose
subzone status for the apparel, footwear,
and luggage warehousing and
distribution facilities of VF Corporation
(VFC), located in Martinsville, Virginia.
The application was submitted pursuant
to the provisions of the Foreign–Trade
Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–
81u), and the regulations of the Board
(15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed
on December 2, 2009.
The VFC facilities consist of two sites
(183 employees): Site 1 - warehouse/
distribution center (466,700 sq.ft./60.1
acres/168 employees) located at 500
Nautica Way, Martinsville; Site 2 warehouse/distribution center (891,913
sq.ft./117.6 acres/15 employees) located
at 3375 Joseph Martin Highway,
Martinsville, Virginia. The facilities are
used for warehousing and distribution
of foreign–origin apparel, footwear, and
luggage for the U.S. market and export.
FTZ procedures would be utilized to
support VFC’s U.S.-based value–added
and distribution activity. Finished
products to be admitted to the proposed
subzone for distribution would include
men’s, boys’, women’s and girls’
footwear, coats, suits, jackets, trousers,
pants, blouses, shirts, tops, jumpers,
gowns, underwear, hosiery, sleepwear,
robes, athletic wear, neckties, hats,
scarves, shawls, mufflers, gloves/
mittens, infants’ apparel, luggage, hand
bags, attaches, backpacks, and
packaging materials. The applicant is
not seeking manufacturing or processing
authority with this request.
FTZ procedures could exempt VFC
from customs duty payments on foreign
products that are exported (about 1% of
shipments). On domestic sales, duty
payments would be deferred until the
foreign merchandise is shipped from the
facility and entered for U.S.
consumption. FTZ designation would
further allow VFC to realize logistical
benefits through the use of weekly
customs entry procedures. The
application indicates that the savings
from FTZ procedures would help
improve the facilities’ international
competitiveness.
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66620-66621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29928]
[[Page 66620]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-816]
Certain Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan:
Final Results and Final Rescission in Part of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 8, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published in the Federal Register the preliminary results
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain
stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Taiwan. See Certain
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Intent
to Rescind in Part, and Notice of Intent Not to Revoke Order in Part,
74 FR 32532 (July 8, 2009) (``Preliminary Results''). The merchandise
covered by the order is certain stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings
from Taiwan as described in the ``Scope of the Order'' section of this
notice. The period of review (``POR'') is June 1, 2007, through May 31,
2008. We provided interested parties an opportunity to comment on our
Preliminary Results. Based upon our analysis of the comments received,
we made changes to the margin calculation. The final weighted-average
dumping margin is listed below in the section titled ``Final Results of
Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0195 or (202) 482-3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department's preliminary results of review were published on
July 8, 2009. See Preliminary Results. We invited parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results. We received a case brief from the sole
respondent, Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd. (``Ta Chen's Brief'') on
August 10, 2009. We did not receive any case or rebuttal briefs from
petitioners Flowline Division of Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., Shaw
Alloy Piping Products, Inc., Core Pipe (formerly known as Gerlin, Inc.)
and Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc.
Revocation
On June 30, 2008, Ta Chen requested, under 19 CFR 351.222(b)(2) and
(e), that the antidumping duty order, as it relates to Ta Chen, be
revoked based on the absence of dumping, and included with its request
certain company certifications regarding revocation. In this case, our
margin calculation shows that Ta Chen sold the subject merchandise at
less than normal value during the current review period. Additionally,
Ta Chen predicates its request on the assumption that action by the
Court of International Trade will result in recalculations for the two
immediately preceding administrative reviews of margins at zero or de
minimis. While we acknowledge that the Department's determinations in
the two prior segments of this proceeding are currently in litigation,
there is no final and conclusive judgment from any court supporting Ta
Chen's arguments or invalidating the Department's findings in the prior
administrative reviews. See Preliminary Results at 32533-34.
Accordingly, we determine, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(b)(2), that
revocation of the order with respect to Ta Chen is not warranted.
Scope of the Order
The products subject to the order are certain stainless steel butt-
weld pipe fittings, whether finished or unfinished, under 14 inches
inside diameter. Certain welded stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings
(``pipe fittings'') are used to connect pipe sections in piping systems
where conditions require welded connections. The subject merchandise is
used where one or more of the following conditions is a factor in
designing the piping system: (1) Corrosion of the piping system will
occur if material other than stainless steel is used; (2) contamination
of the material in the system by the system itself must be prevented;
(3) high temperatures are present; (4) extreme low temperatures are
present; and (5) high pressures are contained within the system. Pipe
fittings come in a variety of shapes, with the following five shapes
the most basic: ``elbows,'' ``tees,'' ``reducers,'' ``stub ends,'' and
``caps.'' The edges of finished pipe fittings are beveled. Threaded,
grooved, and bolted fittings are excluded from the order. The pipe
fittings subject to the order are classifiable under subheading
7307.23.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order
is dispositive. Pipe fittings manufactured to American Society of
Testing and Materials specification A774 are included in the scope of
the order.
Partial Rescission of Review
In the Preliminary Results, the Department issued a notice of
intent to rescind the review with respect to Liang Feng Stainless Steel
Fitting Co., Ltd. (``Liang Feng''), Tru-Flow Industrial Co., Ltd.
(``Tru-Flow''), Censor International Corporation (``Censor'') and PFP
Taiwan Co., Ltd. (``PFP''), because we found they had no entries of
subject merchandise during the POR. See Preliminary Results at 32533.
As the Department received no comments on our intent to rescind, we
find that rescission of the review concerning Liang Feng, Tru-Flow,
Censor, and PFP is appropriate. Therefore, the Department is rescinding
the review with respect to Liang Feng, Tru-Flow, Censor, and PFP.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case brief, as well as the Department's
findings, in this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Certain Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe
Fittings from Taiwan (``Decision Memorandum''), dated December 7, 2009,
which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised and
to which we have responded is found in the Decision Memorandum,
appended to this notice. The Decision Memorandum is on file in the
Central Records Unit in room 1117 of the main Commerce building, and
can also be accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov. The
paper copy and electronic version of the public version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we determine that the following
weighted-average margin exists for the period June 1, 2007, through May
31, 2008:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Manufacturer Margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd..................... 0.82 percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries, pursuant to section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (``the
[[Page 66621]]
Act''), and 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department calculated importer-
specific duty assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total
amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the
total entered value of the examined sales for that importer. Where the
assessment rate is above de minimis, we will instruct CBP to assess
duties on all entries of subject merchandise manufactured or exported
by Ta Chen. Antidumping duties for the rescinded companies, Liang Feng,
Tru-Flow, Censor, and PFP, shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry,
or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of
these final results of review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification applies to POR entries of subject merchandise produced by
companies examined in this review (i.e., companies for which a dumping
margin was calculated) where the companies did not know that their
merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of certain stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings from
Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date of these final results, as provided by
section 751(a) of the Act: (1) for the company covered by this review,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate listed above; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this
review but covered in the less-than-fair-value investigation or a prior
review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific
rate from the most recent review; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value
investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be that
established for the most recent period for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will be 51.01 percent, the all-others rate established in the
less-than-fair-value investigation. These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred, and in the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also is the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 7, 2009.
Carole A. Showers,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
APPENDIX
Issues in Decision Memorandum
1. Purchased Fittings
2. Calculation of General and Administrative (``G&A'') Expenses
3. Ta Chen's Raw Material and Conversion Cost Variances
4. Constructed Export Price (``CEP'') Offset
5. Basis of Dumping Margin Calculation
6. Calculation of CEP Profit Ratio
[FR Doc. E9-29928 Filed 12-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S