In the Matter of Certain Multimedia Display and Navigation Devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 66676 [E9-29824]
Download as PDF
66676
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 16, 2009 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–694]
In the Matter of Certain Multimedia
Display and Navigation Devices and
Systems, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
November 13, 2009, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Pioneer
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and
Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. of Long
Beach, California. A letter
supplementing the complaint was filed
on December 4, 2009. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain multimedia
display and navigation devices and
systems, components thereof, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,365,448; 6,122,592; and
5,424,951. The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s ADD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:18 Dec 15, 2009
Jkt 220001
Commission’s electronic docket (EDI) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–3052.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
December 9, 2009, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of multimedia display and
navigation devices and systems,
components thereof, and products
containing same that infringe one or
more of claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent
No. 5,365,448; claims 1 and 2 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,122,592; and claims 1 and
2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,424,951, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Pioneer Corporation, 1–4–1 Meguro,
Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153–8654, Japan.
Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., 2255 E.
220th Street, Long Beach, CA 90810.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Garmin International, Inc., 1200 E. 151st
Street, Olathe, KS 66062.
Garmin Corporation, No. 68, Jangshu
2nd Road, Shijr, Taipei County,
Taiwan.
Honeywell International Inc., 101
Columbia Road, Morristown, NJ
07960.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC
20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 10, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–29824 Filed 12–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Pursuant to Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act and the Emergency
Planning and Community Right-ToKnow Act
Notice is hereby given that on
December 10, 2009, a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Elan
Chemical Company, Inc., Civil Action
No. 2:09–CV–06183 KSH, was lodged
with the United States District Court for
the District of New Jersey.
The proposed Consent Decree will
resolve the United States’ claims under
Section 3008 of the Resource Recovery
and Conservation Act, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 6928(a), and Section 313 and
325(c) of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act
(EPCRA), 42 U.S.C. 11023 and 11045(c)
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 66676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29824]
[[Page 66676]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-694]
In the Matter of Certain Multimedia Display and Navigation
Devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same;
Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on November 13, 2009, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Pioneer Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc.
of Long Beach, California. A letter supplementing the complaint was
filed on December 4, 2009. The complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain multimedia display and navigation devices and systems,
components thereof, and products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,365,448;
6,122,592; and 5,424,951. The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's ADD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDI) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office
of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-3052.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on December 9, 2009, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of multimedia display
and navigation devices and systems, components thereof, and products
containing same that infringe one or more of claims 1 and 2 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,365,448; claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 6,122,592; and
claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,424,951, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Pioneer Corporation, 1-4-1 Meguro, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8654, Japan.
Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., 2255 E. 220th Street, Long Beach, CA
90810.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Garmin International, Inc., 1200 E. 151st Street, Olathe, KS 66062.
Garmin Corporation, No. 68, Jangshu 2nd Road, Shijr, Taipei County,
Taiwan.
Honeywell International Inc., 101 Columbia Road, Morristown, NJ 07960.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 10, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-29824 Filed 12-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P