Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 66089-66090 [E9-29727]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 238 / Monday, December 14, 2009 / Notices
a hearing on November 20, 2008, in
which all interested parties participated.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–832]
Pure Magnesium from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 8, 2009, the
Department published its preliminary
results in the antidumping duty
administrative review of pure
magnesium from the PRC.1 The period
of review (‘‘POR’’) for the administrative
review is May 1, 2007, through April 30,
2008. We have determined that Tianjin
Magnesium International Co., Ltd.
(‘‘TMI’’), the only respondent in this
review, made sales in the United States
at prices below normal value (‘‘NV’’).
There are no other respondents covered
by this review. We invited interested
parties to comment on our preliminary
results in this review. Based on our
analysis of the comments we received in
the administrative review, we made
certain changes to our Preliminary
Results. The final dumping margins for
this review are listed in the ‘‘Final
Results Margins’’ section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 14, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eugene Degnan, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0414, respectively.
Background
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
The Department published its
preliminary results on June 8, 2009.2 We
invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. We received
comments from Petitioner,3 TMI and
Alcoa Inc., a U.S. consumer of pure
magnesium. Interested parties submitted
case and rebuttal briefs on July 17 and
July 23, 2008, respectively. On
September 29, 2008, the Department
extended the deadline for the final
results to December 8, 2008.4 We held
1 See Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 74 FR 27090 (June 8, 2009)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 See Preliminary Results.
3 United States Magnesium LLC.
4 See Pure Magnesium From the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Time for the Final
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 74 FR 48904 (September 24, 2009).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:54 Dec 11, 2009
Jkt 220001
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), we verified the information
submitted by TMI for use in our final
results of review.5 We used standard
verification procedures, including
examination of relevant accounting and
production records, as well as original
source documents provided by TMI.
Period of Review
The POR is May 1, 2007, through
April 30, 2008.
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by this order is
pure magnesium regardless of
chemistry, form or size, unless expressly
excluded from the scope of this order.
Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy
containing by weight primarily the
element magnesium and produced by
decomposing raw materials into
magnesium metal. Pure primary
magnesium is used primarily as a
chemical in the aluminum alloying,
desulfurization, and chemical reduction
industries. In addition, pure magnesium
is used as an input in producing
magnesium alloy. Pure magnesium
encompasses products (including, but
not limited to, butt ends, stubs, crowns
and crystals) with the following primary
magnesium contents: (1) Products that
contain at least 99.95 percent primary
magnesium, by weight (generally
referred to as ‘‘ultra pure’’ magnesium);
(2) Products that contain less than 99.95
percent but not less than 99.8 percent
primary magnesium, by weight
(generally referred to as ‘‘pure’’
magnesium); and (3) Products that
contain 50 percent or greater, but less
than 99.8 percent primary magnesium,
by weight, and that do not conform to
ASTM specifications for alloy
magnesium (generally referred to as
‘‘off–specification pure’’ magnesium).
‘‘Off–specification pure’’ magnesium
is pure primary magnesium containing
magnesium scrap, secondary
magnesium, oxidized magnesium or
impurities (whether or not intentionally
added) that cause the primary
magnesium content to fall below 99.8
percent by weight. It generally does not
contain, individually or in combination,
5 See Memorandum to Wendy J. Frankel,
‘‘Verification of the Sales and Factors Responses of
Tianjin Magnesium International, Ltd. in the 20072008 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Pure Magnesium from the People’s
Republic of China, (‘‘TMI Verification Report’’)’’
dated November 4, 2009, on the record of this
review Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room 1117
of the main Department building.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66089
1.5 percent or more, by weight, of the
following alloying elements: aluminum,
manganese, zinc, silicon, thorium,
zirconium and rare earths.
Excluded from the scope of this order
are alloy primary magnesium (that
meets specifications for alloy
magnesium), primary magnesium
anodes, granular primary magnesium
(including turnings, chips and powder)
having a maximum physical dimension
(i.e., length or diameter) of one inch or
less, secondary magnesium (which has
pure primary magnesium content of less
than 50 percent by weight), and
remelted magnesium whose pure
primary magnesium content is less than
50 percent by weight.
Pure magnesium products covered by
this order are currently classifiable
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) subheadings
8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.20.00,
8104.30.00, 8104.90.00, 3824.90.11,
3824.90.19 and 9817.00.90. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
our written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Separate Rate
In the Preliminary Results, we
determined that TMI met the criteria for
the application of a separate
antidumping duty rate.6 We have
continued to grant TMI a separate rate
because we have not received any
information since the Preliminary
Results which would warrant
reconsideration of our separate–rate
determination. Therefore, we have
assigned an individual antidumping
duty margin to TMI for this review
period.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties in this review
are addressed in the memorandum from
John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations to
Carole A. Showers, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Pure Magnesium from the
People’s Republic of China,’’ dated
December 7, 2009, which is hereby
adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum’’). A list of the
issues which parties raised and to
which we respond in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached to
this notice as an Appendix. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
6 See
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
Preliminary Results, 74 FR at 27092-3.
14DEN1
66090
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 238 / Monday, December 14, 2009 / Notices
document and is on file in the CRU,
Main Commerce Building, Room 1117,
and is accessible on the Web at http://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper copy and
electronic version of the memorandum
are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the results of the verification
and an analysis of the comments
received, the Department has assigned a
margin based on adverse facts available
(‘‘AFA’’), to TMI for these final results.7
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of these final results
of administrative review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The Department has determined that
the information to construct an accurate
and otherwise reliable margin is not
available on the record with respect to
TMI because TMI’s producers withheld
information that had been requested,
significantly impeded this proceeding,
and provided information that could not
be verified, pursuant to sections
776(a)(1) and (2)(A), (C) and (D) of the
of Act.8 As a result, the Department has
determined to apply the facts otherwise
available.9 Further, because the
Department finds that TMI’s producers
have failed to cooperate to the best of
their ability, pursuant to section 776(b)
of the Act, the Department has
determined to use an adverse inference
when applying facts available in this
review.10 As AFA, the Department is
applying a rate of 111.73, which is the
highest calculated rate on the record of
any segment of the proceeding.11 In
accordance with section 776(b) of the
Act, the Department has corroborated
this rate to the extent practicable.12
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: 1) for the
exporter listed above, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate shown for that
company; 2) for previously investigated
or reviewed PRC and non–PRC
exporters not listed above that have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter–specific rate
published for the most recent period; 3)
for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the PRC–
wide rate of 108.26 percent; and 4) for
all non–PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporters that supplied that non–PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Final Results Margins
Notification of Interested Parties
We determine that the following
weighted–average percentage margins
exist for the POR:
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
Use of Facts Available
PURE MAGNESIUM FROM THE PRC
Exporter
Weighted–Average
Margin (Percent)
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
TMI ................................
111.73 Percent
7 For a complete discussion of the basis for, and
application of, AFA with respect to TMI in this
review, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum
at Comment 1, and the Memorandum to the File,
‘‘Application of Adverse Facts Available for Tianjin
Magnesium International, Ltd. in the Review of
Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘AFA Memorandum’’),’’ dated December 7,
2009.
8 See AFA Memorandum at 12-13.
9 Id.
10 Id. at 13-14.
11 See Pure Magnesium From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 76336
(December 16, 2008) (‘‘Pure Magnesium 06-07’’).
12 See AFA Memorandum at 17-19.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:55 Dec 11, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation that
is subject to sanctions.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results of administrative review
and notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 7, 2009.
Carole A. Showers,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administrtation.
Appendix I
List of Issues
Comment 1: Application of Facts Available
with Adverse Inferences to TMI
Comment 2: Reconciliation of TMI’s
Financial Statements
Comment 3: Amended Preliminary Results
based on Verification
Comment 4: Sulfur and Dolomite
Comment 5: By–product Cement Clinker
Comment 6: By–product Waste Magnesium
Comment 7: Surrogate Values for No. 2 Flux
Comment 8: Surrogate Values for Coal
Comment 9: Surrogate Financial Statements
Comment 10: China Wage Rate
[FR Doc. E9–29727 Filed 12–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–953]
Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven
Selvedge from the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination and
Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty
Determination with Final Antidumping
Duty Determination
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
preliminarily determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge from the People’s Republic of
China. For information on the estimated
subsidy rates, see the ‘‘Suspension of
Liquidation’’ section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 14, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Holland or Anna Flaaten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1279 or (202) 482–
5156, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 238 (Monday, December 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66089-66090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29727]
[[Page 66089]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-832]
Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 8, 2009, the Department published its preliminary
results in the antidumping duty administrative review of pure magnesium
from the PRC.\1\ The period of review (``POR'') for the administrative
review is May 1, 2007, through April 30, 2008. We have determined that
Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd. (``TMI''), the only
respondent in this review, made sales in the United States at prices
below normal value (``NV''). There are no other respondents covered by
this review. We invited interested parties to comment on our
preliminary results in this review. Based on our analysis of the
comments we received in the administrative review, we made certain
changes to our Preliminary Results. The final dumping margins for this
review are listed in the ``Final Results Margins'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR
27090 (June 8, 2009) (``Preliminary Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 14, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Degnan, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0414, respectively.
Background
The Department published its preliminary results on June 8,
2009.\2\ We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We
received comments from Petitioner,\3\ TMI and Alcoa Inc., a U.S.
consumer of pure magnesium. Interested parties submitted case and
rebuttal briefs on July 17 and July 23, 2008, respectively. On
September 29, 2008, the Department extended the deadline for the final
results to December 8, 2008.\4\ We held a hearing on November 20, 2008,
in which all interested parties participated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Preliminary Results.
\3\ United States Magnesium LLC.
\4\ See Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China:
Extension of Time for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 74 FR 48904 (September 24, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(``the Act''), we verified the information submitted by TMI for use in
our final results of review.\5\ We used standard verification
procedures, including examination of relevant accounting and production
records, as well as original source documents provided by TMI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum to Wendy J. Frankel, ``Verification of the
Sales and Factors Responses of Tianjin Magnesium International, Ltd.
in the 2007-2008 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China, (``TMI
Verification Report'')'' dated November 4, 2009, on the record of
this review Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Room 1117 of the main
Department building.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Review
The POR is May 1, 2007, through April 30, 2008.
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by this order is pure magnesium regardless of
chemistry, form or size, unless expressly excluded from the scope of
this order. Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight
primarily the element magnesium and produced by decomposing raw
materials into magnesium metal. Pure primary magnesium is used
primarily as a chemical in the aluminum alloying, desulfurization, and
chemical reduction industries. In addition, pure magnesium is used as
an input in producing magnesium alloy. Pure magnesium encompasses
products (including, but not limited to, butt ends, stubs, crowns and
crystals) with the following primary magnesium contents: (1) Products
that contain at least 99.95 percent primary magnesium, by weight
(generally referred to as ``ultra pure'' magnesium); (2) Products that
contain less than 99.95 percent but not less than 99.8 percent primary
magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as ``pure'' magnesium); and
(3) Products that contain 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8
percent primary magnesium, by weight, and that do not conform to ASTM
specifications for alloy magnesium (generally referred to as ``off-
specification pure'' magnesium).
``Off-specification pure'' magnesium is pure primary magnesium
containing magnesium scrap, secondary magnesium, oxidized magnesium or
impurities (whether or not intentionally added) that cause the primary
magnesium content to fall below 99.8 percent by weight. It generally
does not contain, individually or in combination, 1.5 percent or more,
by weight, of the following alloying elements: aluminum, manganese,
zinc, silicon, thorium, zirconium and rare earths.
Excluded from the scope of this order are alloy primary magnesium
(that meets specifications for alloy magnesium), primary magnesium
anodes, granular primary magnesium (including turnings, chips and
powder) having a maximum physical dimension (i.e., length or diameter)
of one inch or less, secondary magnesium (which has pure primary
magnesium content of less than 50 percent by weight), and remelted
magnesium whose pure primary magnesium content is less than 50 percent
by weight.
Pure magnesium products covered by this order are currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheadings 8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.20.00, 8104.30.00,
8104.90.00, 3824.90.11, 3824.90.19 and 9817.00.90. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope is dispositive.
Separate Rate
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that TMI met the criteria
for the application of a separate antidumping duty rate.\6\ We have
continued to grant TMI a separate rate because we have not received any
information since the Preliminary Results which would warrant
reconsideration of our separate-rate determination. Therefore, we have
assigned an individual antidumping duty margin to TMI for this review
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Preliminary Results, 74 FR at 27092-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this review are addressed in the memorandum from John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations to Carole A. Showers, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Pure
Magnesium from the People's Republic of China,'' dated December 7,
2009, which is hereby adopted by this notice (``Issues and Decision
Memorandum''). A list of the issues which parties raised and to which
we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this
notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public
[[Page 66090]]
document and is on file in the CRU, Main Commerce Building, Room 1117,
and is accessible on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper
copy and electronic version of the memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the results of the verification and an analysis of the
comments received, the Department has assigned a margin based on
adverse facts available (``AFA''), to TMI for these final results.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For a complete discussion of the basis for, and application
of, AFA with respect to TMI in this review, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 1, and the Memorandum to the File,
``Application of Adverse Facts Available for Tianjin Magnesium
International, Ltd. in the Review of Pure Magnesium from the
People's Republic of China (``AFA Memorandum''),'' dated December 7,
2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use of Facts Available
The Department has determined that the information to construct an
accurate and otherwise reliable margin is not available on the record
with respect to TMI because TMI's producers withheld information that
had been requested, significantly impeded this proceeding, and provided
information that could not be verified, pursuant to sections 776(a)(1)
and (2)(A), (C) and (D) of the of Act.\8\ As a result, the Department
has determined to apply the facts otherwise available.\9\ Further,
because the Department finds that TMI's producers have failed to
cooperate to the best of their ability, pursuant to section 776(b) of
the Act, the Department has determined to use an adverse inference when
applying facts available in this review.\10\ As AFA, the Department is
applying a rate of 111.73, which is the highest calculated rate on the
record of any segment of the proceeding.\11\ In accordance with section
776(b) of the Act, the Department has corroborated this rate to the
extent practicable.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See AFA Memorandum at 12-13.
\9\ Id.
\10\ Id. at 13-14.
\11\ See Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 76336
(December 16, 2008) (``Pure Magnesium 06-07'').
\12\ See AFA Memorandum at 17-19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results Margins
We determine that the following weighted-average percentage margins
exist for the POR:
Pure Magnesium from the PRC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Exporter Margin (Percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TMI................................................. 111.73 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these
final results of administrative review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: 1) for the exporter
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate shown for that
company; 2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC
exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; 3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 108.26 percent; and 4) for
all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to
the PRC exporters that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APOs'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation that is subject to sanctions.
We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative
review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1)
of the Act.
Dated: December 7, 2009.
Carole A. Showers,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administrtation.
Appendix I
List of Issues
Comment 1: Application of Facts Available with Adverse Inferences to
TMI
Comment 2: Reconciliation of TMI's Financial Statements
Comment 3: Amended Preliminary Results based on Verification
Comment 4: Sulfur and Dolomite
Comment 5: By-product Cement Clinker
Comment 6: By-product Waste Magnesium
Comment 7: Surrogate Values for No. 2 Flux
Comment 8: Surrogate Values for Coal
Comment 9: Surrogate Financial Statements
Comment 10: China Wage Rate
[FR Doc. E9-29727 Filed 12-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S