Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education-European Union-United States Atlantis Program; Program for North American Mobility in Higher Education; United States-Brazil Higher Education Consortia Program; United States-Russia Program: Improving Research and Educational Activities in Higher Education, 65764-65765 [E9-29584]
Download as PDF
65764
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 237 / Friday, December 11, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Fund for the Improvement of
Postsecondary Education—European
Union-United States Atlantis Program;
Program for North American Mobility
in Higher Education; United StatesBrazil Higher Education Consortia
Program; United States-Russia
Program: Improving Research and
Educational Activities in Higher
Education
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers (CFDA) Numbers: 84.116J
(European Union (EU)-United States (U.S.)
Atlantis Program), 84.116N (Program for
North American Mobility in Higher
Education), 84.116M (U.S.-Brazil Higher
Education Consortia Program), 84.116S (U.S.Russia Program: Improving Research and
Educational Activities in Higher Education).
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priorities.
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Postsecondary Education announces
one absolute priority for each of the four
special focus competitions conducted
by the Fund for the Improvement of
Postsecondary Education (FIPSE): The
EU–U.S. Atlantis Program, the Program
for North American Mobility in Higher
Education, the U.S.-Brazil Higher
Education Consortia Program, and the
U.S.-Russia Program: Improving
Research and Educational Activities in
Higher Education competitions.
The Assistant Secretary may use these
priorities for competitions in fiscal year
(FY) 2010 and in later years. We take
this action to focus Federal financial
assistance on an identified need in the
area of postsecondary education. We
intend these absolute priorities to
improve postsecondary education
opportunities by supporting the
formation of international educational
consortia and encouraging cooperation
in the coordination of curricula, the
exchange of students, and the opening
of educational opportunities between
the U.S. and the countries involved in
these programs.
DATES: Effective Date: These priorities
are effective January 11, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Beaton, U.S. Department of
Education, 1990 K Street, NW., room
6154, Washington, DC 20006–8544.
Telephone: (202) 502–7621 or by e-mail:
Sarah.Beaton@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service, toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 10, 2009
Jkt 220001
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Fund for the Improvement of
Postsecondary Education (FIPSE)
program is to support reforms,
innovations, and significant
improvements of postsecondary
education that respond to problems of
national significance and serve as
international models. Under the FIPSE
program, the Secretary makes grants for
special projects concerning areas of
national need.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1138–
1138d.
We published a notice of proposed
priorities for the FIPSE program in the
Federal Register on September 8, 2009
(74 FR 46117). That notice contained
background information and our reasons
for proposing the particular priorities.
Except for minor editorial revisions,
there are no differences between the
proposed priorities and these final
priorities.
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation in the notice of proposed
priorities, we did not receive any
substantive comments on the proposed
priorities.
Final Priorities:
Absolute Priority 1—EU–U.S. Atlantis
Program (84.116J).
This priority supports the formation
of educational consortia between the EU
and U.S. institutions. To meet this
priority, the applicant must propose a
project that encourages cooperation in
the coordination of curricula; the
exchange of students, if pertinent to
grant activities; and the opening of
educational opportunities between the
U.S. and countries in the EU. In order
to be eligible for an award under this
priority, the applicant in the U.S. must
be a U.S. institution and the applicant
in the EU must be an EU institution.
EU institutions participating in any
consortium proposal under this priority
may apply to the Directorate-General for
Education and Culture (DG EAC),
European Commission for funding
under a separate but parallel EU
competition.
Absolute Priority 2—Program for
North American Mobility in Higher
Education (84.116N).
This priority supports the formation
of educational consortia of U.S.,
Canadian, and Mexican institutions. To
meet this priority, the applicant must
propose a project that supports
cooperation in the coordination of
curricula; the exchange of students, if
pertinent to grant activities; and the
opening of educational opportunities
among the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. In
order to be eligible for an award under
this priority, the applicant in the U.S.
must be a U.S. institution, the applicant
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in Mexico must be a Mexican
institution, and the applicant in Canada
must be a Canadian institution.
Canadian and Mexican institutions
participating in any consortium
proposal under this priority may apply,
respectively, to Human Resources and
Social Development Canada (HRSDC) or
the Mexican Secretariat for Public
Education (SEP), for additional funding
under separate but parallel Canadian
and Mexican competitions.
Absolute Priority 3—U.S.-Brazil
Higher Education Consortia Program
(84.116M).
This priority supports the formation
of educational consortia of U.S. and
Brazilian institutions. To meet this
priority, the applicant must propose a
project that supports cooperation in the
coordination of curricula; the exchange
of students, if pertinent to grant
activities; and the opening of
educational opportunities between the
U.S. and Brazil. In order to be eligible
for an award under this priority, the
applicant in the U.S. must be a U.S.
institution and the applicant in Brazil
must be a Brazilian institution. Brazilian
institutions participating in any
consortium proposal under this priority
may apply to the Coordination of
Improvement of Personnel of Superior
Level (CAPES), Brazilian Ministry of
Education, for additional funding under
a separate but parallel Brazilian
competition.
Absolute Priority 4—U.S.-Russian
Program: Improving Research and
Educational Activities in Higher
Education (84.116S).
This priority supports the formation
of educational consortia of U.S. and
Russian institutions to encourage
mutual socio-cultural-linguistic
cooperation; the coordination of joint
development of curricular, educational
materials; and the exchange of students.
In order to be eligible for an award
under this priority, the applicant in the
U.S. must be a U.S. institution and the
applicant in Russia must be a Russian
institution. Russian institutions will
receive separate but parallel funding
from the Russian Ministry of Education
and Science.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 237 / Friday, December 11, 2009 / Notices
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by: (1) Awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from
proposing additional priorities,
requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use one or more of these priorities, we
invite applications through a notice in the
Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this final
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this final regulatory action are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined as
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this final regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priorities
justify the costs.
We have determined, also, that this
final regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
We summarized the costs and benefits
of this regulatory action in the notice of
proposed priorities.
Intergovernmental Review: The FIPSE
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 10, 2009
Jkt 220001
65765
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
ARRT projects train rehabilitation
researchers, including researchers with
disabilities, with particular attention to
research areas that support the
implementation and objectives of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
(Act), and that improve the effectiveness
of services authorized under the Act.
Priority: In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(ii), this priority is from the
regulations for this program (34 CFR
350.12 and 350.64 through 350.65).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2010 this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Advanced Rehabilitation Research
Training Projects
ARRT projects must (1) Recruit and
select candidates for advanced research
training; (2) provide a training program
that includes didactic and classroom
instruction, is multidisciplinary,
emphasizes scientific research
methodology, and may involve
collaboration among institutions; (3)
provide research experience, laboratory
experience, or its equivalent, in a
community-based research setting, and
a practicum experience that involves
each trainee in clinical research and in
activities with organizations
representing individuals with
disabilities; (4) provide academic
mentorship or guidance, and
opportunities for scientific collaboration
with qualified researchers at the host
university and other appropriate
institutions; and (5) provide
opportunities for participation in the
development of professional
presentations and publications, and for
attendance at professional conferences
and meetings, as appropriate for the
individual’s field of study and level of
experience.
It is expected that applicants will
articulate goals, objectives, and
expected outcomes for the research
training activities. Applicants should
describe expected public benefits of
these training activities, especially
benefits for individuals with
disabilities, and propose projects that
are optimally designed to demonstrate
outcomes that are consistent with the
proposed goals. Applicants are
encouraged to include information
describing how they will measure
outcomes, including the indicators for
determining that results have occurred.
Submission of this measurement
information is voluntary, except where
required by the selection criteria listed
in the application package.
A grantee for an ARRT project must
provide training to individuals for at
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary
of Education has delegated authority to
Daniel T. Madzelan, Director,
Forecasting and Policy Analysis for the
Office of Postsecondary Education, to
perform the functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
Dated: December 8, 2009.
Daniel T. Madzelan,
Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis.
[FR Doc. E9–29584 Filed 12–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services Overview
Information; National Institute on
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR)—Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers
Program—Advanced Rehabilitation
Research Training (ARRT) Projects;
Notice Inviting Applications for New
Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.133P–1
Dates:
Applications Available: December 11,
2009.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: February 9, 2010.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
this program is to provide research
training and experience at an advanced
level to individuals with doctorates, or
similar advanced degrees, who have
clinical or other relevant experience.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 237 (Friday, December 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65764-65765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29584]
[[Page 65764]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education--European
Union-United States Atlantis Program; Program for North American
Mobility in Higher Education; United States-Brazil Higher Education
Consortia Program; United States-Russia Program: Improving Research and
Educational Activities in Higher Education
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) Numbers:
84.116J (European Union (EU)-United States (U.S.) Atlantis Program),
84.116N (Program for North American Mobility in Higher Education),
84.116M (U.S.-Brazil Higher Education Consortia Program), 84.116S
(U.S.-Russia Program: Improving Research and Educational Activities
in Higher Education).
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priorities.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education announces
one absolute priority for each of the four special focus competitions
conducted by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education
(FIPSE): The EU-U.S. Atlantis Program, the Program for North American
Mobility in Higher Education, the U.S.-Brazil Higher Education
Consortia Program, and the U.S.-Russia Program: Improving Research and
Educational Activities in Higher Education competitions.
The Assistant Secretary may use these priorities for competitions
in fiscal year (FY) 2010 and in later years. We take this action to
focus Federal financial assistance on an identified need in the area of
postsecondary education. We intend these absolute priorities to improve
postsecondary education opportunities by supporting the formation of
international educational consortia and encouraging cooperation in the
coordination of curricula, the exchange of students, and the opening of
educational opportunities between the U.S. and the countries involved
in these programs.
DATES: Effective Date: These priorities are effective January 11, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Beaton, U.S. Department of
Education, 1990 K Street, NW., room 6154, Washington, DC 20006-8544.
Telephone: (202) 502-7621 or by e-mail: Sarah.Beaton@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Fund for the Improvement of
Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) program is to support reforms,
innovations, and significant improvements of postsecondary education
that respond to problems of national significance and serve as
international models. Under the FIPSE program, the Secretary makes
grants for special projects concerning areas of national need.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1138-1138d.
We published a notice of proposed priorities for the FIPSE program
in the Federal Register on September 8, 2009 (74 FR 46117). That notice
contained background information and our reasons for proposing the
particular priorities.
Except for minor editorial revisions, there are no differences
between the proposed priorities and these final priorities.
Public Comment: In response to our invitation in the notice of
proposed priorities, we did not receive any substantive comments on the
proposed priorities.
Final Priorities:
Absolute Priority 1--EU-U.S. Atlantis Program (84.116J).
This priority supports the formation of educational consortia
between the EU and U.S. institutions. To meet this priority, the
applicant must propose a project that encourages cooperation in the
coordination of curricula; the exchange of students, if pertinent to
grant activities; and the opening of educational opportunities between
the U.S. and countries in the EU. In order to be eligible for an award
under this priority, the applicant in the U.S. must be a U.S.
institution and the applicant in the EU must be an EU institution.
EU institutions participating in any consortium proposal under this
priority may apply to the Directorate-General for Education and Culture
(DG EAC), European Commission for funding under a separate but parallel
EU competition.
Absolute Priority 2--Program for North American Mobility in Higher
Education (84.116N).
This priority supports the formation of educational consortia of
U.S., Canadian, and Mexican institutions. To meet this priority, the
applicant must propose a project that supports cooperation in the
coordination of curricula; the exchange of students, if pertinent to
grant activities; and the opening of educational opportunities among
the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. In order to be eligible for an award
under this priority, the applicant in the U.S. must be a U.S.
institution, the applicant in Mexico must be a Mexican institution, and
the applicant in Canada must be a Canadian institution. Canadian and
Mexican institutions participating in any consortium proposal under
this priority may apply, respectively, to Human Resources and Social
Development Canada (HRSDC) or the Mexican Secretariat for Public
Education (SEP), for additional funding under separate but parallel
Canadian and Mexican competitions.
Absolute Priority 3--U.S.-Brazil Higher Education Consortia Program
(84.116M).
This priority supports the formation of educational consortia of
U.S. and Brazilian institutions. To meet this priority, the applicant
must propose a project that supports cooperation in the coordination of
curricula; the exchange of students, if pertinent to grant activities;
and the opening of educational opportunities between the U.S. and
Brazil. In order to be eligible for an award under this priority, the
applicant in the U.S. must be a U.S. institution and the applicant in
Brazil must be a Brazilian institution. Brazilian institutions
participating in any consortium proposal under this priority may apply
to the Coordination of Improvement of Personnel of Superior Level
(CAPES), Brazilian Ministry of Education, for additional funding under
a separate but parallel Brazilian competition.
Absolute Priority 4--U.S.-Russian Program: Improving Research and
Educational Activities in Higher Education (84.116S).
This priority supports the formation of educational consortia of
U.S. and Russian institutions to encourage mutual socio-cultural-
linguistic cooperation; the coordination of joint development of
curricular, educational materials; and the exchange of students. In
order to be eligible for an award under this priority, the applicant in
the U.S. must be a U.S. institution and the applicant in Russia must be
a Russian institution. Russian institutions will receive separate but
parallel funding from the Russian Ministry of Education and Science.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
[[Page 65765]]
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by: (1)
Awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use one or more of these priorities, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this final regulatory
action.
The potential costs associated with this final regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this final regulatory action, we have determined
that the benefits of the proposed priorities justify the costs.
We have determined, also, that this final regulatory action does
not unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
We summarized the costs and benefits of this regulatory action in
the notice of proposed priorities.
Intergovernmental Review: The FIPSE program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the
objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies
on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination
and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister. To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary of Education has delegated
authority to Daniel T. Madzelan, Director, Forecasting and Policy
Analysis for the Office of Postsecondary Education, to perform the
functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
Dated: December 8, 2009.
Daniel T. Madzelan,
Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis.
[FR Doc. E9-29584 Filed 12-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P