In the Matter of Certain Laser Imageable Lithographic Printing Plates; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Termination of the Investigation, 65154-65155 [E9-29287]
Download as PDF
65154
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
management of native riparian habitats
within the Enrolled Properties. The
objective of such activities is to enhance
populations of California red-legged
frogs, least Bell’s vireos, and
southwestern willow flycatchers by
increasing the amount and quality of
suitable habitat on the Enrolled
Properties. Take of California red-legged
frogs, least Bell’s vireos, and
southwestern willow flycatchers
incidental to the aforementioned
activities is unlikely; however, it is
possible that in the course of such
activities or other lawful activities on
the enrolled property, the Applicant
could incidentally take California redlegged frog, least Bell’s vireo, and
southwestern willow flycatcher, thereby
necessitating take authority under the
permit.
Pre-Agreement conditions (baseline)
have been determined for each enrolled
property based on the occurrence of
California red-legged frog, least Bell’s
vireo, and southwestern willow
flycatcher and the extent of suitable
habitat as provided in the Agreement.
The Applicant must maintain baseline
on an enrolled property in order to
receive coverage regarding incidental
take of California red-legged frogs, least
Bell’s vireos, and southwestern willow
flycatchers. The Agreement and
requested permit would allow the
Applicant to return to baseline
conditions after the end of the term of
the Agreement and prior to the
expiration of the 30-year permit, if so
desired by the Applicant.
Public Review and Comments
The Service has made a preliminary
determination that the proposed
Agreement and permit application are
eligible for categorical exclusion under
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
We explain the basis for this
determination in an Environmental
Action Statement, which also is
available for public review.
Individuals wishing copies of the
permit application, copies of our draft
Environmental Action Statement, and
copies of the Agreement, including a
map of the proposed permit area, should
contact the Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office (see ADDRESSES).
If you wish to comment on the permit
application or the Agreement, you may
submit your comments to the address
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. Comments and materials
received, including names and
addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the address in the ADDRESSES
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
section above and will become part of
the public record, under section 10(c) of
the Act. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their home
address from the record, which we will
honor to the extent allowable by law.
There also may be circumstances in
which we would withhold from the
record a respondent’s identity, as
allowable by law. If you wish us to
withhold your name or address or both,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. All
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, are
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
We will evaluate this permit
application, associated documents, and
comments we receive to determine
whether the permit application meets
the requirements of section 10(a) of the
Act and NEPA regulations. If we
determine that the requirements are
met, we will sign the proposed
Agreement and issue an enhancement of
survival permit under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the Act to the Applicant
for take of the California red-legged frog,
the least Bell’s vireo, and the
southwestern willow flycatcher
incidental to otherwise lawful activities
in accordance with the terms of the
Agreement. We will not make our final
decision until after the end of the 30day comment period and will fully
consider all comments we receive
during the comment period.
The Service provides this notice
under section 10(c) of the Act and under
implementing regulations for NEPA (40
CFR 1506.6).
Dated: December 2, 2009.
Diane K. Noda,
Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office.
[FR Doc. E9–29354 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–636]
In the Matter of Certain Laser
Imageable Lithographic Printing
Plates; Issuance of a Limited
Exclusion Order and Termination of
the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has issued a limited
exclusion order directed to infringing
laser imageable lithographic printing
plates.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3042. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on March
13, 2008, based on a complaint filed by
Presstek, Inc. of Hudson, New
Hampshire (‘‘Presstek’’). The complaint
alleged violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain laser
imageable lithographic printing plates
that infringe certain claims of United
States Patent Nos. 5,339,737 (‘‘the ’737
patent’’) and 5,487,338 (‘‘the ’338
patent’’) and United States Trademark
Registration No. 1,711,005 (‘‘the ’005
trademark’’). All assertions relating to
the ’005 trademark were subsequently
terminated from the investigation.
Certain respondents were also
terminated during the course of the
investigation. The following
respondents remain in the investigation:
VIM Technologies, Ltd. of Kibbutz
Hanita, Israel; Hanita Coatings RCA,
Ltd. of Kibbutz Hanita, Israel;
Guaranteed Service & Supplies, Inc. of
West Bend, Wisconsin; AteCe Canada of
Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Recognition
Systems, Inc. of Port Washington, New
York; and Spicers Paper, Inc. of Santa
Fe Springs, California (collectively,
‘‘Respondents’’).
On July 24, 2009, the ALJ issued a
final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) finding
the domestic industry requirement
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
satisfied, finding a violation of section
337 and containing a recommended
determination on remedy and bonding.
The ALJ recommended that, in the event
the Commission finds a violation of
section 337, the Commission should
issue a limited exclusion order directed
to all of Respondents’ accused products
found to infringe the ’737 and ’338
patents. ID at 101–104. The ALJ further
recommended that if the Commission
imposes a remedy following a finding of
violation, Respondents should be
required to post a bond of 100 percent
of the entered value of accused products
imported during the Presidential review
period. Id.
Respondents filed a combined
petition for review of the ID, and
Presstek and the Commission
Investigative Attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed
oppositions thereto. On September 24,
2009, the Commission determined to
review certain aspects of the ID relating
to claim construction and to modify the
ID by supplementing the claim
construction analysis. 74 FR 49890
(Sept. 29, 2009). The Commission also
requested written submissions on the
issues of remedy, the public interest and
bonding, and further requested
submissions of proposed remedial
orders. Id.
On October 5, 2009, Respondents
filed a collective brief on the issues for
which the Commission requested
written submissions. Presstek and the
IA filed their briefs on those same issues
on October 6, 2009, and on October 13,
2009, Presstek filed a response to
Respondents’ brief.
Having reviewed the record in this
investigation, including the ID and the
parties’ written submissions, the
Commission has determined that the
appropriate form of relief is a limited
exclusion order prohibiting the
unlicensed entry of laser imageable
lithographic printing plates that infringe
one or more of claims 1, 10 and 27 of
the ’737 patent or claims 20, 21 and 23
of the ’338 patent and that are
manufactured abroad by or on behalf of,
or imported by or on behalf of,
Respondents.
The Commission further determines
that the public interest factors
enumerated in section 337(d) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)) do not preclude issuance of the
limited exclusion order. Finally, the
Commission determines that no bond is
required to permit temporary
importation during the period of
Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j))
of the laser imageable lithographic
printing plates that are subject to the
order. The Commission’s order and
opinion were delivered to the President
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
and to the United States Trade
Representative on the day of their
issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in
sections 210.50 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
210.50.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 30, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–29287 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–693]
In the Matter of Certain Foldable
Stools; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
November 6, 2009, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of B & R Plastics,
Inc. of Denver, Colorado. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain foldable stools by
reason of infringement of U.S. Patent
No. D460,566. The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65155
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: T.
Spence Chubb, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2575.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
December 3, 2009, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain foldable stools by
reason of infringement of the claim of
U.S. Patent No. D460,566, and whether
an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
B & R Plastics, Inc., 4550 Kingston
Street, Denver, CO 80239.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Ningbo ZhongTian Co., Ltd., 23F/B Hai
Hong Building No. 12, Huai Shu
Xiang, Ningbo, China.
Ningbo Ningfeng Import and Export Co.
Ltd., 23/F Hai Hong Building No. 12,
Huaishu Xiang, Ningbo, Zhejiang,
China.
Kikkerland Design, Inc., 423–427 West
127th Street, New York, NY 10027.
abc Distributing Inc., 2800 Lakeside
Drive, Bannockburn, IL 60015.
Always Something Brilliant, 6720 East
47th Avenue Drive, Denver, CO
80216.
Amazon.com, Inc., 1200 12th Ave.
South, Ste. 1200, Seattle, WA 98144–
2734.
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., 650 Liberty
Avenue, Union, NJ 07083, Buy.com
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65154-65155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29287]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-636]
In the Matter of Certain Laser Imageable Lithographic Printing
Plates; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Termination of the
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has issued a limited exclusion order directed to infringing
laser imageable lithographic printing plates.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on March
13, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Presstek, Inc. of Hudson, New
Hampshire (``Presstek''). The complaint alleged violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain laser
imageable lithographic printing plates that infringe certain claims of
United States Patent Nos. 5,339,737 (``the '737 patent'') and 5,487,338
(``the '338 patent'') and United States Trademark Registration No.
1,711,005 (``the '005 trademark''). All assertions relating to the '005
trademark were subsequently terminated from the investigation. Certain
respondents were also terminated during the course of the
investigation. The following respondents remain in the investigation:
VIM Technologies, Ltd. of Kibbutz Hanita, Israel; Hanita Coatings RCA,
Ltd. of Kibbutz Hanita, Israel; Guaranteed Service & Supplies, Inc. of
West Bend, Wisconsin; AteCe Canada of Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
Recognition Systems, Inc. of Port Washington, New York; and Spicers
Paper, Inc. of Santa Fe Springs, California (collectively,
``Respondents'').
On July 24, 2009, the ALJ issued a final initial determination
(``ID'') finding the domestic industry requirement
[[Page 65155]]
satisfied, finding a violation of section 337 and containing a
recommended determination on remedy and bonding. The ALJ recommended
that, in the event the Commission finds a violation of section 337, the
Commission should issue a limited exclusion order directed to all of
Respondents' accused products found to infringe the '737 and '338
patents. ID at 101-104. The ALJ further recommended that if the
Commission imposes a remedy following a finding of violation,
Respondents should be required to post a bond of 100 percent of the
entered value of accused products imported during the Presidential
review period. Id.
Respondents filed a combined petition for review of the ID, and
Presstek and the Commission Investigative Attorney (``IA'') filed
oppositions thereto. On September 24, 2009, the Commission determined
to review certain aspects of the ID relating to claim construction and
to modify the ID by supplementing the claim construction analysis. 74
FR 49890 (Sept. 29, 2009). The Commission also requested written
submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest and bonding,
and further requested submissions of proposed remedial orders. Id.
On October 5, 2009, Respondents filed a collective brief on the
issues for which the Commission requested written submissions. Presstek
and the IA filed their briefs on those same issues on October 6, 2009,
and on October 13, 2009, Presstek filed a response to Respondents'
brief.
Having reviewed the record in this investigation, including the ID
and the parties' written submissions, the Commission has determined
that the appropriate form of relief is a limited exclusion order
prohibiting the unlicensed entry of laser imageable lithographic
printing plates that infringe one or more of claims 1, 10 and 27 of the
'737 patent or claims 20, 21 and 23 of the '338 patent and that are
manufactured abroad by or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of,
Respondents.
The Commission further determines that the public interest factors
enumerated in section 337(d) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d)) do not preclude
issuance of the limited exclusion order. Finally, the Commission
determines that no bond is required to permit temporary importation
during the period of Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) of the
laser imageable lithographic printing plates that are subject to the
order. The Commission's order and opinion were delivered to the
President and to the United States Trade Representative on the day of
their issuance.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in sections 210.50 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
19 CFR 210.50.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 30, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-29287 Filed 12-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P