Notice of Proposed Individual Exemption Involving Ford Motor Company, Located in Detroit, MI, 64716-64733 [E9-29223]
Download as PDF
64716
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
on date of certification through two years
from the date of certification, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,460]
Delphi Steering Including On-Site
Leased Workers From ACRO Service
Corporation, et al.; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on July 14, 2009, applicable
to workers of Delphi Steering, including
on-site leased workers from Bartech and
Securitas, Saginaw, Michigan. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on September 2, 2009 (74 FR
45477). The notice was amended on
October 7, 2009 to include on-site
leased workers. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
October 20, 2009 (74 FR 53760–53761).
At the request of the State Agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of steering systems and components
such as steering columns, gears, pumps
and electronic power steering systems.
The company reports that on-site
leased workers from Interim Health Care
were employed on-site at the Saginaw,
Michigan location of Delphi Steering.
The Department has determined that
these workers were sufficiently under
the control of the subject firm to be
considered leased workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased
from Interim Health Care working onsite at the Saginaw, Michigan location of
Delphi Steering.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–70,460 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Delphi Steering, including
on-site leased workers from Bartech,
Securitas, Acro Service Corp., Aerotek, Inc.,
Continental, Inc., Dynamic Corp., G-Tech
Professional Staffing, Inc., GlobalEdge
Technologies, Inc. (formerly CAE Tech),
Gonzalez Contract Services, Integrated
Partners Group LLC, Kelly Services,
Manpower, Inc., Rapid Global Business
Solutions, Inc., TAC Worldwide, Trialon
Corp., Trison Business Solutions, Wright K.
Technologies and Interim Health Care,
Saginaw, Michigan, who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
after May 20, 2008, through July 14, 2011,
and all workers in the group threatened with
total or partial separation from employment
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
Signed in Washington, DC, this 10th day of
November 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9–29150 Filed 12–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Application No. L–11575]
Notice of Proposed Individual
Exemption Involving Ford Motor
Company, Located in Detroit, MI
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed individual
exemption.
This document contains a notice of
pendency (the Notice) before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
a proposed individual exemption from
certain prohibited transaction
restrictions of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act or
ERISA). The transactions involve the
UAW Ford Retirees Medical Benefits
Plan (the Ford VEBA Plan) and its
funding vehicle, the UAW Retiree
Medical Benefits Trust (the VEBA
Trust), (collectively the VEBA).1 The
proposed exemption, if granted, would
affect the VEBA, and its participants
and beneficiaries.
DATES: Effective Date: If granted, this
proposed exemption will be effective as
of December 31, 2009.
DATES: Written comments and requests
for a public hearing on the proposed
exemption should be submitted to the
Department within 40 days from the
date of publication of this Federal
Register Notice.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and
requests for a public hearing concerning
the proposed exemption should be sent
to the Office of Exemption
Determinations, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Room N–5700,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington
1 Because the Ford VEBA Plan will not be
qualified under section 401 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), there is no
jurisdiction under Title II of the Act pursuant to
section 4975 of the Code. However, there is
jurisdiction under Title I of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DC 20210, Attention: Application No.
L–11575. Interested persons are also
invited to submit comments and/or
hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or
FAX. Any such comments or requests
should be sent either by e-mail to:
ford@dol.gov, or by FAX to (202) 219–
0204 by the end of the scheduled
comment period. The application for
exemption and the comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Public Disclosure Room of the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–1513, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Comments and hearing requests will
also be available online at https://
www.regulations.gov and https://
www.dol.gov/ebsa, at no charge.
Warning: If you submit written
comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or
confidential business information that
you do not want to be publiclydisclosed. All comments and hearing
requests are posted on the Internet
exactly as they are received, and they
can be retrieved by most Internet search
engines. The Department will make no
deletions, modifications or redactions to
the comments or hearing requests
received, as they are public records.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Warren Blinder, Office of Exemption
Determinations, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, telephone (202)
693–8553. (This is not a toll-free
number).
This
document contains a notice of proposed
individual exemption from the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A),
406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(a)(1)(E),
406(a)(2), 406(b)(1), 406(b)(2), and
407(a) of ERISA. The proposed
exemption has been requested in an
application filed by the Ford Motor
Company (Ford or the Applicant)
pursuant to section 408(a) of ERISA and
in accordance with the procedures set
forth in 29 CFR 2570, Subpart B (55 FR
32836, August 10, 1990). Effective
December 31, 1978, section 102 of
Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, (43
FR 47713, October 17, 1978) transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Accordingly, this proposed exemption
is being issued solely by the
Department.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
Summary of Facts and
Representations 2
1. The Applicant
Ford and its subsidiaries have been
engaged primarily in worldwide
automotive production and marketing
operations. Ford designs, manufactures,
and markets vehicles worldwide, with
its largest operating presence in North
America. Ford maintains its
headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan. As
of December 31, 2008, Ford had
approximately 71,000 active employees
in the United States, of whom
approximately 42,000 are represented
by the UAW and other unions.
Approximately 285,000 retirees and
dependents in the U.S. receive retiree
health benefits from Ford, and of this
total, approximately 196,000 are hourly
retirees and spouses, surviving spouses,
and eligible dependents. As of
December 31, 2008, Ford had total
assets on its consolidated balance sheet
of $218 billion.
2. Other Parties in Interest in the
Covered Transactions
In addition to the Applicant, the
parties in interest involved in the
covered transactions described herein
are (1) the committee that manages the
VEBA Trust and is the administrator
and a named fiduciary of the Ford
VEBA Plan (the Committee), (2) an
independent fiduciary to be engaged by
the Committee to manage employer
securities held by the VEBA Trust (the
Independent Fiduciary), (3) the trustee
of the VEBA Trust, State Street Bank
and Trust Company (the Trustee), and
(4) the Ford-UAW Holdings LLC
(described below). The role of each of
these parties is described in detail
below.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
3. Background
Ford historically has provided retiree
medical benefits to former UAW
represented employees under the
Hospital-Surgical-Medical-Drug-DentalVision Program (the Ford Retiree Health
Plan). On February 13, 2006, Ford and
the International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural
Implement Workers of America (the
UAW) and a class of retirees entered
into a Settlement Agreement in the case
of UAW v. Ford Motor Co., No. 05–
74730, 2006 WL 1984363 (E.D. Mich.
July 13, 2006), aff’d sub nom. UAW v.
Gen. Motors Corp., 497 F.3d 615 (6th
Cir. 2007) (consolidated appeal) (the
Hardwick I Settlement Agreement). The
2 The Summary of Facts and Representations is
based on the Applicant’s representations and does
not reflect the views of the Department.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
case was brought to contest whether
Ford has the right to unilaterally modify
hourly retiree welfare benefits for
hourly retirees who had been
represented by the UAW.
Under the terms of the Hardwick I
Settlement Agreement, a new health
benefit plan was established to mitigate
costs shifted to the affected retirees. The
benefits provided under the new plan
were to be paid from a voluntary
employees’ beneficiary association (the
Mitigation VEBA) controlled by a
committee independent of Ford (the
Mitigation VEBA Committee). The
Mitigation VEBA was to be funded by
Ford through cash and other payments,
and by contributions from active Ford
employees through wage deferrals and
the diversion of cost-of-living
adjustments. The Hardwick I Settlement
Agreement was to remain in effect until
at least September 14, 2011, after which
either Ford or the UAW could terminate
the agreement and reassert its original
position regarding Ford’s ability to
unilaterally terminate retiree health care
benefits.
Despite entering into the Hardwick I
Settlement Agreement, Ford’s retiree
health care funding obligations
continued to present a significant
impact on the Company’s financial
condition, which had been exacerbated
by recent global economic conditions. In
addition, many of Ford’s competitors
enjoyed a sizeable competitive
advantage due to the fact that they
lacked the legacy expenses attributable
to retiree health benefits. For these
reasons, in 2007 Ford announced its
intention to terminate retiree health care
coverage for UAW represented
employees and retirees and its plan to
terminate the Hardwick I Settlement
Agreement, in 2011. The UAW again
contested Ford’s unilateral right to alter
retiree health benefits, asserting that
such benefits were vested and could not
be modified without consent.
Consequently, throughout October and
November 2007, the parties attempted to
resolve the impasse through prolonged
negotiations.
Ultimately, Ford and the UAW agreed
to a permanent restructuring of postretirement medical benefits and the
parties executed a Memorandum of
Understanding on November 3, 2007
(the MOU), under which benefits would
be funded through a new independent
voluntary employees’ beneficiary
association, the VEBA Trust. The UAW
and counsel to the class of plaintiffs
(Class Counsel) in Hardwick I believed
that the retiree health benefits of the
classes of plaintiffs would have greater
security if funded by the VEBA Trust,
because it would be independent of
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64717
Ford. According to the Applicant, this
belief was based on an extensive study
of Ford financial data, provided by
Ford, which led to the conclusion that
in the event of a Ford bankruptcy, the
assets in the VEBA would have greater
security.
Under the MOU, the Ford VEBA Plan
and the VEBA Trust would assume
responsibility for post-retirement
medical benefits commencing in 2010.
In exchange, Ford would deposit or
remit $13.2 billion in assets (on a
present value basis, as of December 31,
2007) to the VEBA Trust. In outlining
benefits for retirees and the terms of
Ford’s payment obligations, the MOU
generally followed the pattern set by
GM and Chrysler in their bargaining
with the UAW.3
Despite the parties agreeing to the
MOU, on November 9, 2007, the UAW
and a class of retirees (the 2007 Class)
filed suit against Ford in the United
States District Court for the Eastern
District of Michigan (the District Court)
challenging Ford’s unilateral right to
alter retiree health benefits and asserting
that such benefits were vested. See Int’l
Union, UAW, et al. v. Ford Motor
Company, Civil Action No. 07–14845,
2008 WL 4104329 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 29,
2008).
Following another round of
negotiations, Ford and the UAW agreed
to a proposed settlement (the 2008
Settlement Agreement). See Ford Motor
Co., 2008 WL 4104329. The negotiations
included a comprehensive analysis and
evaluation of the parties’ claims and
defenses and of the impact of rising
health care costs on Ford’s financial
condition. The agreement followed a
pattern similar to settlement agreements
reached between the UAW and GM and
Chrysler, respectively.4
Pursuant to the Department’s request,
Ford, the UAW and Class Counsel
agreed to amend the proposed form of
the trust agreement for the VEBA Trust
(the Trust Agreement) to clarify that the
Committee, which manages the VEBA
Trust and is the administrator and a
named fiduciary of the Ford VEBA Plan,
would be guided by the principle that
the Ford VEBA Plan should provide
substantial health benefits for the
duration of the lives of all participants
and beneficiaries when determining the
design of health benefits. After a
3 Under the terms of the MOU, UAW-represented
employees hired after November 19, 2007 were no
longer eligible for retiree health benefit coverage
under Ford’s retiree medical health plan or under
the Ford VEBA Plan funded by the VEBA Trust.
4 See UAW v. Gen. Motors Corp., No. 07–CV–
14074–DT, 2008 WL 2968408 (E.D. Mich. July 31,
2008); UAW v. Chrysler, No. 07–CV–14310, 2008
WL 2980046 (E.D. Mich. July 31, 2008).
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
64718
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
fairness hearing, the 2008 Settlement
Agreement was approved by the District
Court on August 29, 2008 as fair,
reasonable, and adequate. See Ford
Motor Co., 2008 WL 4104329.
The 2008 Settlement Agreement was
intended to permanently resolve the
parties’ disputes and satisfy and replace
the prior Hardwick I Settlement
Agreement. Under the 2008 Settlement
Agreement, based on the framework of
the MOU, Ford’s obligations for
providing post-retirement medical
benefits to the 2007 Class and a group
of Ford active employees eligible for
retiree benefits (the 2007 Covered
Group) would be terminated and the
Ford VEBA Plan would be established
and maintained by the Committee. The
Ford VEBA Plan would be funded by
the VEBA Trust, which would be
responsible for the payment of postretirement medical benefits to members
of the 2007 Class and the 2007 Covered
Group. Under the terms of the 2008
Settlement Agreement, coverage and
operations for the Ford VEBA Plan
would commence on the day following
the ‘‘Implementation Date,’’ or January
1, 2010. Ford also agreed to transfer
assets to the VEBA Trust on behalf of
the Ford VEBA Plan with an estimated
worth of $13.2 billion, based on a
present value as of December 31, 2007.
As the economic environment
continued to deteriorate in late 2008,
Ford decided to take further action to
remain competitive with other
automobile manufacturers and to be
able to operate profitably. Ford’s
principal domestic competitors (GM and
Chrysler) were being required, under the
terms of government-funded bridge
loans, to reduce their public unsecured
debt obligations by two-thirds, to reduce
by one-half the cash expense associated
with their retiree health care VEBA
trusts, and to achieve parity in labor
costs with the U.S. operations of nondomestic automobile makers. Notably,
GM and Chrysler were required to make
payments to their employer-specific
accounts in the VEBA Trust in at least
50% employer stock. Consequently,
Ford and the UAW amended their 2007
collective bargaining agreement to allow
Ford to reduce its labor costs. The
amendment was ratified by the UAW’s
membership and became effective on
March 16, 2009. On July 23, 2009, Ford,
the UAW, and Class Counsel entered
into an agreement to amend the 2008
Settlement Agreement (the Amendment
Agreement) by providing, inter alia, that
Ford may use Ford common stock (Ford
Common Stock) to pay up to
approximately 50% of certain future
obligations to the VEBA Trust on behalf
of the Ford VEBA Plan. The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
Amendment Agreement does not reduce
the present value of the assets to be
provided to the VEBA Trust under the
2008 Settlement Agreement, but instead
altered the form and timing of Ford’s
obligation to the VEBA Trust in a
manner that facilitates efforts to
restructure Ford’s debt and substantially
reduce the risk that Ford will default on
its obligations to the VEBA Trust.
The revised settlement agreement (the
2009 Settlement Agreement) took effect
on November 9, 2009, upon the District
Court’s issuance of an ‘‘Order and Final
Judgment’’ granting approval to the
Amendment Agreement (the Order and
Final Judgment), including approval of
the amendment to the Trust Agreement
(the Trust Agreement Amendment) and
certification of the class under the
modified class definition.5 The 2009
Settlement Agreement, inter alia,
updates the definition of the ‘‘Class’’
under the 2008 Settlement Agreement to
include individuals who have retired
since the 2008 Settlement Agreement or
their spouses and dependents (the
Class) and are eligible to receive health
care benefits under the Ford VEBA
Plan.6 The 2009 Settlement Agreement
also similarly expands the members
included in the definition of the 2007
Covered Group (the Covered Group).7
4. The Ford VEBA Plan and VEBA Trust
Under the 2009 Settlement
Agreement, the UAW Ford Retirees
Employees’ Beneficiary Association (the
Ford EBA), acting through the
Committee, will establish and maintain
the Ford VEBA Plan, subject to ERISA,
for the purpose of providing retiree
health benefits to the Class and the
Covered Group on and after the day
following the Implementation Date,
which will be December 31, 2009. Until
then, Ford will continue to provide
retiree health care benefits to the Class
and the Covered Group at the same
levels and scope as agreed to in the
Hardwick I Settlement Agreement. On
the day following the Implementation
Date and continuing thereafter,
decisions about benefit levels are to be
made by the Committee, which will
have sole responsibility to determine
the scope and level of retiree health
benefits available to the Class and the
5 See Int’l Union, UAW, et al. v. Ford Motor
Company, Civil Action No. 07–14845, (E.D. Mich.
Nov. 9, 2009) (Doc. # 71, Order and Final J.).
6 The expanded definition of Class can be found
on page 3 of the 2009 Settlement Agreement.
7 The expanded definition of Covered Group can
be found on pages 4–5 of the 2009 Settlement
Agreement. Notably, this definition includes certain
Ford Active Employees who had attained seniority
on or prior to November 19, 2007, and who retire
on or after August 15, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Covered Group under the Ford VEBA
Plan.
The Committee is not obligated to
design the Ford VEBA Plan to assure
that the assets in the VEBA Trust are
sufficient to provide benefits to all
potential participants and beneficiaries
in the Ford VEBA Plan in all future
years. Instead, the Committee’s longterm objective in designing the Ford
VEBA Plan, absent countervailing
circumstances, is to provide
‘‘meaningful health benefits’’ to all
participants and beneficiaries in the
Ford VEBA Plan.8
Acting through the Committee, the
VEBA Trust was established on October
16, 2008, by the Ford EBA, along with
the UAW Chrysler Retirees Employee’s
Beneficiary Association and the UAW
GM Retirees Employees’ Beneficiary
Association.9 The 2009 Settlement
Agreement provides that the VEBA
Trust will be responsible for the
payment of post-retirement medical
benefits under the Ford VEBA Plan to
members of the Class and the Covered
Group the day following the
Implementation Date. The VEBA Trust
intends to be qualified under section
501(c)(9) of the Code, as amended, and
comply as applicable with the LaborManagement Relations Act of 1947, as
amended, 29 U.S.C. 186, and will be
subject to ERISA.
The VEBA Trust is structured to have
three separate retiree accounts, designed
to segregate payments from each of
Ford, GM, and Chrysler, pursuant to the
terms of each company’s settlement
agreement with the UAW and the
respective class. The purpose of each
separate retiree account is to serve as a
segregated, dedicated account to be used
for the sole purpose of funding benefits
provided under each related new plan
and defraying the reasonable expenses
of each plan. Each retiree account will
also have a separate sub-account
maintained to hold any Employer
Security 10 and any proceeds from the
disposition of any such security. Assets
from one separate retiree account may
not offset the liabilities or defray the
expenses attributable to another
separate account. The VEBA Trust was
8 See
Section 10.2(a) of the Trust Agreement.
VEBA Trust consists of three separate
employees’ beneficiary associations, each of which
has a membership of the applicable Ford, GM, and
Chrysler retirees who may become eligible to
participate in each separate employee welfare
benefit plan established on behalf of the members
of each respective eligible group.
10 The Trust Agreement, as amended, defines an
‘‘Employer Security’’ as any obligation, note,
warrant, bond, debenture, stock, or other security
within the meaning of section 407(d)(1) of ERISA
that is acquired or held by the VEBA Trust (or
arising from any such security through conversion).
9 The
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
structured as a single trust with separate
retiree accounts to allow for the pooled
investment of assets credited to each of
the separate retiree accounts and to
provide economies of scale to the
Committee in providing services for
each of the plans. Unless the Committee
decides to establish segregated
investment vehicles for specific separate
retiree accounts, the assets of the
separate retiree accounts, other than any
employer security sub-account, will be
invested on a pooled basis within the
VEBA Trust.
Ford is obligated to make certain
payments to the VEBA Trust which will
be credited to Ford’s separate retiree
account under the VEBA Trust (the Ford
Separate Retiree Account). The Ford
Separate Retiree Account will accept the
deposits, contributions, and remittances
of, or attributable to, Ford’s payments
and will pay benefits under the Ford
VEBA Plan, as described below. Any
Employer Security contributed by Ford
to the VEBA Trust will be held in a
separate sub-account (the Ford
Employer Security Sub-Account).
5. The Committee of the VEBA Trust
The Committee acts as the manager,
plan administrator and named fiduciary
with respect to the Ford VEBA Plan, and
it appoints the Trustee, the Independent
Fiduciary (as defined herein) and all
investment managers of the VEBA
Trust’s assets. The Committee may also
retain independent professional service
providers that it deems necessary and
appropriate to administer the Ford
VEBA Plan.
The Committee is comprised of eleven
individuals, consisting of two groups:
six Independent Members and five
UAW Members. The initial Independent
Members were approved by the District
Court in the 2008 Settlement and the
UAW Members were appointed by the
UAW. The Committee will function
completely independently of Ford,
which has no power of appointment of
the Committee’s members. No member
of the Committee may be a current or
former officer, director or employee of
Ford, GM, or Chrysler, except that a
retiree who was represented by the
UAW in his or her employment with
either Ford, GM, or Chrysler, or an
employee of any such company who is
on leave from the company and is
represented by the UAW, may be a
UAW Member. None of the Independent
Members nor any family members,
employers or partners of an
Independent Member may have any
financial or institutional relationship
with either Ford, GM, or Chrysler, if
such relationship could reasonably be
expected to impair such Independent
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
Member’s exercise of independent
judgment. Any member of the
Committee who is an employee of the
UAW or a local union will serve
without compensation from the Ford
VEBA Plan. Other members of the
Committee will be compensated for
their services as provided in the Trust
Agreement.
The UAW Members serve at the
discretion of the UAW and may be
removed or replaced, and a successor
designated, at any time by written
notice by the UAW International
President to the Committee.
Independent Members serve for a term
of three years, except two of the initial
Independent Members will have initial
terms of two years each, and two other
initial Independent Members will have
initial terms of one year each. An
Independent Member may serve more
than one term and will serve on the
Committee until his or her death,
incapacity to serve, resignation,
removal, or expiration of his or her
term. An Independent Member may be
removed or replaced, and a successor
designated, at any time by an affirmative
vote of nine of the other members of the
Committee. In the event of a vacancy in
the group of Independent Members,
whether by expiration of a term,
resignation, removal, incapacity, or
death, a successor Independent Member
will be elected by the affirmative vote of
nine members. If a successor
Independent Member is not appointed
within a reasonable time after a
vacancy, an arbitrator may be
appointed, upon application of any
member, to appoint a successor
Independent Member to the Committee.
A majority of the members of the
Committee then in office shall
constitute a quorum for the purpose of
transacting any business; provided that
at least one Independent Member and
one UAW Member are present. Each
Member of the Committee present at the
meeting shall have one vote. Generally,
for any Committee action to take effect,
such action must be approved by
majority vote of the entire Committee,
provided that at least one Independent
Member and one UAW Member cast a
vote with the majority. In the event of
a vacancy in a class of members, the
majority of the remaining members of
the class may cast the vote of the vacant
member. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
any change in benefits must receive the
affirmative vote of nine or more
members.
The Committee will select a chair (the
Chair) from among its members. The
term of the Chair will continue until he
or she ceases to be a member, resigns as
Chair or is replaced as Chair with
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64719
another member by majority vote among
the remaining members.
6. Ford’s Role and Transition Issues
Ford represents that it will not be a
fiduciary with respect to the VEBA
Trust or the Ford VEBA Plan, and will
have no role in the governance of the
VEBA Trust. As noted above, Ford will
not have the ability to appoint any
member to the Committee, and the
Committee is not authorized to act for
Ford and is not an agent or
representative of Ford for any purpose.
Ford has agreed pursuant to the 2009
Settlement Agreement to cooperate with
the UAW and the Committee to
undertake reasonable actions as
requested to assist the Committee in the
transition of responsibility for
administration of retiree health benefits
by the Committee for the VEBA Trust
and the Ford VEBA Plan. Such
cooperation may include assisting the
Committee in education efforts and
communications with respect to
members of the Class and the Covered
Group so that they understand the terms
of the VEBA Trust and the Ford VEBA
Plan, the transition of benefit coverage,
the claims process, and other
administrative changes undertaken by
the Committee. At the Committee’s
request, Ford has also agreed to furnish
information to the Committee as
reasonably necessary to permit the
Committee to effectively administer the
VEBA Trust and the Ford VEBA Plan,
including data maintained by Ford to
the extent permitted by law. Any
payments made by Ford for this purpose
will not reduce Ford’s payment
obligations to the VEBA Trust on behalf
of the Ford VEBA Plan under the 2009
Settlement Agreement.
If requested by the Committee, and
subject to reimbursement for reasonable
costs, Ford will continue to perform
eligibility determinations for the Ford
VEBA Plan for a reasonable period of
time, not to exceed 90 days after the
Implementation Date, in order to allow
the Committee to establish and test an
eligibility database. Ford will also assist
the Committee in transitioning benefit
provider contracts to the Ford VEBA
Plan.
To the extent permitted by law, Ford
will cooperate with the Committee to
allow retiree participants in the Ford
VEBA Plan to have required
contributions voluntarily withheld on a
monthly basis from pension benefits
from Ford’s pension plan covering
members of the Class and the Covered
Group (the Ford-UAW Retirement Plan)
and to the extent reasonably practical,
forwarded to the VEBA Trust to be
credited to the Ford Separate Retiree
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
64720
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
Account of the VEBA Trust (the
Contribution Withholding). A
participant may elect or withdraw
consent for such pension withholdings
at any time by providing 45 days written
notice to the Ford-UAW Retirement
Plan administrator or such shorter
period as may be required by law.
Ford will also cooperate with the
Committee to make provision for
incorporating the VEBA Trust payment
of the ‘‘special benefit’’ of $76.20 related
to Medicare Part B premiums into the
monthly Ford pension checks for
eligible retirees and surviving spouses
participating in the Ford VEBA Plan
(the Part B Payment).
The Ford VEBA Plan will be
responsible for the payment of
reasonable costs associated with Ford’s
administration of payment of the
Contribution Withholding and the Part
B Payment. The Applicant asserts that,
to the extent that these payments are
prohibited transactions, the statutory
exemption for the provision of services
provided by section 408(b)(2) of ERISA
provides relief from the prohibited
transaction restrictions of section 406(a)
of ERISA.
ERISA section 408(b)(2) provides
relief for the ‘‘[c]ontracting or making
reasonable arrangements with a party in
interest for office space, or legal,
accounting or other services necessary
for the establishment or operation of the
plan, if no more than reasonable
compensation is paid therefor.’’ Under
the Department’s regulations, a service
is necessary for the establishment or
operation of a plan if the service is
‘‘appropriate and helpful to the plan
obtaining the service in carrying out the
purposes for which the plan is
established or maintained.’’ 29 CFR
2550.408(b)(2).
According to the Applicant, the
Contribution Withholding is helpful to
the Ford VEBA Plan as it reduces
expenses associated with processing
participant contributions and
investigating delinquent contributions.
This service is also helpful to
participants as it assures that
contributions are received timely,
without the need to mail a check
monthly to the Ford VEBA Plan, which
thereby will assure continuation of
health care coverage under the Ford
VEBA Plan for these participants.
Accordingly, the Contribution
Withholding is appropriate and helpful
to the Ford VEBA Plan in carrying out
its purpose because it reduces expenses
and aids in making sure participants
receive benefits without interruption.
With respect to the Part B Payment,
the Applicant states that it is
appropriate and helpful to the Ford
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
VEBA Plan as it allows the Ford VEBA
Plan to take advantage of an existing
administrative process that incorporates
a defined, monthly payment to
participants into pension checks that
participants are already receiving. This
obviates the need for the Ford VEBA
Plan to develop its own administrative
process for this purpose and undertake
the expense of mailing monthly checks
to all participants. Accordingly, the Part
B Payment reduces expenses of the Ford
VEBA Plan, which helps conserve the
amount of resources available to provide
benefits.
Furthermore, the Applicant represents
that the costs of the Contribution
Withholding and the Part B Payment
have not yet been determined. However,
the Committee will be subject to
ERISA’s fiduciary responsibility rules
when determining the cost structure,
and the 2009 Settlement Agreement
states that both services will only be
provided to the extent permitted by law,
and a cost that is not reasonable would
not permitted by law.
In the Department’s view, relief under
section 408(b)(2) would be available for
these services provided the conditions
of that exemption are satisfied.
Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the
Committee to determine whether the
services provided by Ford satisfy all of
the conditions set forth in the statutory
exemption and pertinent regulations.
7. Payments to the Ford VEBA Plan
As described in more detail below, on
or following the Implementation Date
under the 2009 Settlement Agreement,
Ford, the Mitigation VEBA Committee,
or the trustee of the Mitigation VEBA, as
applicable, are required, under the
terms of the 2009 Settlement
Agreement, to make, on behalf of the
Ford VEBA Plan, the following deposits
or remittances: (a) Ford shall transfer to
the VEBA Trust the balance in the
temporary asset account created under
the 2008 Settlement Agreement (the
TAA) as of the date of transfer or, at
Ford’s discretion, cash in lieu of some
or all of the investments in the TAA; (b)
Ford shall transfer to the VEBA Trust
two notes issued by Ford (New Note A
and New Note B, and collectively, the
New Notes) in an aggregate principal
amount of $13.2 billion, warrants to
acquire 362,391,305 shares of Ford
Common Stock at a strike price of $9.20
per share (the Warrants), and any shares
of Ford Common Stock transferred by
Ford in settlement of its first payment
obligation under New Note B (Payment
Shares); (c) Ford shall direct the trustee
of the Existing Internal VEBA (as
defined below) to transfer to the VEBA
Trust all assets in the Existing Internal
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
VEBA or cash in an amount equal to the
Existing Internal VEBA balance on the
date of transfer; and (d) the Mitigation
VEBA Committee, or the trustee of the
Mitigation VEBA, as directed by the
District Court’s Order and Final
Judgment, is required to transfer all
assets and liabilities of the Mitigation
VEBA to the VEBA Trust.
8. The TAA and the LLC
Ford created the TAA under the 2008
Settlement Agreement to serve as
tangible evidence of the availability of
Ford assets equal to Ford’s obligation to
the Ford VEBA Plan. The assets in the
TAA, and the investment thereof, are
controlled exclusively by Ford and
include all investment gains/losses
thereon from January 1, 2008, through
the date the assets are transferred to the
VEBA Trust.
In addition, Ford established FordUAW Holdings LLC, a wholly-owned
LLC, to hold the assets in the TAA and
certain other assets required to be
contributed under the 2008 Settlement
Agreement, namely (a) a convertible
note, issued in April 2008 and due
January 1, 2013, with an aggregate
principal amount of $3.3 billion bearing
5.75% interest per annum payable semiannually (the Convertible Note), and (b)
a term note, issued in April 2008 and
due January 1, 2018 with a principal
amount of $3.0 billion bearing 9.50%
interest per annum payable semiannually (the Term Note).
In late 2008, and under the authority
granted to it in the 2008 Settlement
Agreement, Ford caused the LLC to pay
to it $2.282 billion, the value of the
assets in the TAA as of December 31,
2008, in exchange for a note with a
principal amount of $2.282 billion
issued by Ford to the LLC (the TAA
Note). The TAA Note has an interest
rate of 9% per annum and a maturity
date of December 31, 2009. In addition,
Ford will repay to the LLC a ‘‘true-up
amount,’’ calculated according to a
formula provided in the note, to reflect
a hypothetical investment return on the
TAA assets. Since December 31, 2008,
Ford has deposited into the TAA $529.1
million representing interest payments
on the Convertible Note and Term Note
and payments due under the 2008
Settlement Agreement (Base Amount
Payments).11 Ford is also required under
the 2008 Settlement Agreement to
transfer, as the Committee may request,
up to $20 million from the TAA to the
VEBA Trust to cover expenses that will
11 Ford is obligated to make annual ‘‘Base
Amount Payments’’ of $52.3 million for 15 years to
the VEBA Trust under the 2008 Settlement
Agreement.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
be incurred by the VEBA Trust in
anticipation of the Ford VEBA Plan
assuming responsibility for payment of
benefits for the Class or Covered Group
until the Implementation Date. As of
July 31, 2009, the cash balance in the
TAA was $581.2 million.
As soon as practicable after November
30, 2009 (the Exchange Date), the
Convertible Note, the Term Note and the
TAA Note will be cancelled and
returned to Ford in exchange for Ford’s
issuance of the New Notes and Warrants
to the LLC, and Ford’s obligation to
make future Base Amount Payments
will terminate.
9. New Notes
As described above, under the 2009
Settlement Agreement, the Term Note
and Convertible Note, along with the
TAA Note and the right to future Base
Amount Payments, will be exchanged
for the New Notes and Warrants
(described in more detail below). The
aggregate principal amount of the New
Notes and the amortization thereof
represents the equivalent value of (a) the
principal amounts of and interest
payments on the Term Note, the
Convertible Note and the TAA Note; (b)
any unpaid Base Amount Payments; and
(c) an additional $25 million per year
during the period 2009 through 2018,
which is intended to cover transaction
costs the Ford VEBA Plan incurs in
selling any shares of Ford Common
Stock delivered pursuant to Ford’s
exercise of the stock settlement option
under New Note B.12
Unless Ford elects to prepay the
amounts due under the New Note, the
payment schedule under the New Notes
will be as set forth below:
Payment of note A
(million)
Payment date
Payment of note B
(million)
$1,268.47
290
290
679
679
679
679
679
679
679
26
26
26
26
$609.95
609.95
609.95
654
654
654
654
654
654
654
26
26
26
26
December 31, 2009 .....................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2010 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2011 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2012 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2013 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2014 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2015 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2016 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2017 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2018 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2019 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2020 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2021 ..............................................................................................................................................
June 30, 2022 ..............................................................................................................................................
New Note A is a $6,705,470,000
amortizing guaranteed secured note
maturing June 30, 2022. It does not bear
interest except in the event of a default
in a scheduled payment. Payments are
to be made in cash, in annual
installments from 2009 through 2022.
The initial payment of approximately
$1.2 billion, due December 31, 2009, is
significantly larger than the subsequent
payments, in order to provide the VEBA
Trust with funds from which to operate
and pay benefits under the Ford VEBA
Plan.
New Note A is designated as Primary
Second Lien Debt and Second Priority
Additional Debt in accordance with,
and subject to, the terms of a certain
Credit Agreement dated December 15,
2006 with JPMorgan Chase Bank (the
2006 Credit Agreement).13 As such, up
to approximately $1.5 billion of the
principal payments made under New
Note A, and any interest from overdue
principal payments, are secured on a
second lien basis with the collateral
pledged under the 2006 Credit
Agreement. Upon satisfaction of certain
conditions, this second lien security
interest is partially reduced in 2017 and
terminated fully in 2018. New Note A is
also guaranteed, subject to certain
conditions. It will be endorsed with an
unconditional guaranty of payment
issued by certain direct and indirect
wholly-owned Ford subsidiaries (the
Subsidiary Guarantors).14
New Note A is transferable, subject to
limited restrictions. It may not be
reoffered, sold, assigned, transferred,
pledged, encumbered or otherwise
disposed of by the holder except (a) to
the VEBA Trust pursuant to the 2009
Settlement Agreement, (b) to Ford or a
subsidiary thereof, (c) pursuant to a
Ford registration statement that has
become effective under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, (the Securities
Act) or (d) pursuant to an exemption
from registration provided by Rule 144
under the Securities Act or any other
12 Each of New Note A and New Note B
represents approximately 50% of Ford’s overall
funding obligation under the 2008 Settlement
Agreement.
13 It is anticipated that the LLC, as holder of the
New Notes (upon their issuance), will enter into an
Intercreditor Agreement that will set forth certain
priority provisions between the LLC and other
second lien lenders.
14 The Applicant represents that the Ford VEBA
Plan will pay no fees to the Subsidiary Guarantors
in return for their guaranty of the New Notes.
Therefore, the Applicant asserts that although the
guarantees are a prohibited extension of credit
between the Ford VEBA Plan and parties in interest,
such guarantees are covered by the class exemption
granting relief for an interest free loan between a
plan and a party in interest. PTE 80–26, as amended
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
a. Key Terms of New Note A
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
64721
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
available exemption from the
registration requirements of the
Securities Act.
However, the VEBA Trust may assign
or transfer all or any portion of New
Note A provided that (a) the amount of
the assignment or transfer must at least
be in an initial principal amount of
$250,000,000, or if in excess thereof in
an initial principal amount of a multiple
of $100,000,000; (b) the assignment or
transfer is not in violation of applicable
law; (c) Ford and its Subsidiary
Guarantors receive a written agreement
from the assignee or transferee to
undertake the representations,
warranties and covenants of the holder
included in the Securities Exchange
Agreement; and (d) sufficient notice and
evidence of compliance with the
transfer or assignment conditions is
given to Ford.15
b. Key Terms of New Note B
New Note B is a $6,511,850,000
amortizing guaranteed secured note
maturing June 30, 2022. It does not bear
(71 FR 17917 (April 7, 2006)) (Interest-Free Loans).
In the Department’s view, relief under PTE 80–26
would be available for the guarantees provided the
conditions of that exemption are satisfied.
15 See Section 5 of the Securities Exchange
Agreement.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
64722
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
interest except in the event of a default
in a scheduled payment. The initial
principal amount is to be repaid
according to the agreed-upon schedule
of fourteen annual payments set forth
above with an initial payment date on
December 31, 2009.
New Note B is also designated as
Primary Second Lien Debt and Second
Priority Additional Debt in accordance
with, and subject to, the terms of the
2006 Credit Agreement. As such, up to
approximately $1.5 billion of the
principal payments made under New
Note B, and any interest from overdue
principal payments, are secured on a
second lien basis with the collateral
pledged under the 2006 Credit
Agreement. Upon the satisfaction of
certain conditions, this second lien
security interest is partially reduced in
2017 and terminated in its entirety
2018. Additionally, New Note B is
guaranteed in accordance with
substantially identical terms as are
described above for New Note A.16
On each New Note B payment date,
subject to satisfaction of all of the Stock
Settlement Conditions (described
below), Ford has the option to settle any
or all of the amount due with respect to
New Note B with Ford Common Stock
designated as ‘‘Payment Shares’’ of
equal value, determined based on the
volume-weighted average selling price
per share of Ford Common Stock for the
30 trading-day period ending on the
second business day prior to the
relevant payment date. Such Payment
Shares will be subject to certain
registration rights and transfer
restrictions, as described herein.
Ford’s option to settle any or all
portion of the amounts due with respect
to New Note B by delivering Payment
Shares is subject in each instance to the
satisfaction of the following Stock
Settlement Conditions on the applicable
payment date:
1. No event of default has occurred under
Ford’s outstanding public debt securities,
bank credit facilities, or notes or other
securities issued to the VEBA Trust, and Ford
has paid all amounts due on or prior to such
payment date on New Note A and New Note
B (in cash, or through the exercise of the
stock payment option with respect to any
payment or portion thereof or the deferral of
any payment or portion thereof as described
below, as applicable);
2. No bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding
has been commenced by or against Ford;
3. Ford has made no assignment for benefit
of creditors or admission of general inability
to pay debts;
4. Ford Common Stock is listed on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or other
16 See Footnote 14 regarding the applicability of
PTE 80–26.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
national securities exchange on the payment
date, and the NYSE (or such other securities
exchange) has not commenced or provided
notice of the commencement of any delisting
proceedings or inquiries on or prior to the
payment date;
5. No judgment in excess of a specified
amount has remained unsatisfied and
unstayed for more than 30 days;
6. No ‘‘termination event’’ (as defined by
ERISA) has occurred with respect to either of
Ford’s two major U.S. defined benefit
pension plans;
7. Ford has received no audit opinion
containing a going concern explanatory
paragraph for the fiscal year immediately
preceding the applicable payment date; and
8. The price per share of Ford Common
Stock is greater than $1.00 (subject to
customary anti-dilution adjustments).
Furthermore, if on any payment date
under New Note B, conditions 1., 2., 3.,
5., and 6. are met, then, subject to
certain limitations, Ford would
generally have the right to defer such
payment by paying it in up to five equal
annual installments beginning with the
next scheduled payment date, with
interest accruing at 9% beginning on the
date such payment was originally due
and continuing through the date such
payment is made. Thus, Ford may make
such payment (or installment thereof) in
common stock on any deferred
installment date if all the conditions for
payment in common stock have been
met on such date.
c. Department’s Concerns Regarding
New Note B
The Department raised the issue of
Ford’s discretion under New Note B
with Ford, the UAW, and Class Counsel
and received the unanimous response
that the terms would not unduly
disadvantage participants or
beneficiaries of the VEBA Trust. The
Applicant asserted that, although the
Payment Shares will initially be
unregistered, the VEBA Trust will likely
be able to sell the shares with minimal
delay, thus the difference in price
between the unregistered Payment
Shares and publicly traded Ford
Common Stock would be negligible.17
Furthermore, under the terms of New
17 Section 5.01 of the Securityholder and
Registration Rights Agreement by and among Ford
and Ford-UAW Holdings LLC, effective as of
November 9, 2009 (the Securityholder and
Registration Rights Agreement), obligates Ford to
establish a shelf registration as soon as possible
following the delivery of the New Notes. Since Ford
is a well-known seasoned issuer for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act, the shelf registration
should be effective immediately upon filing,
allowing the VEBA Trust to sell shares immediately
following their receipt. In addition, the VEBA Trust
has certain other piggyback registration rights,
rights under Rule 144 and 144A, and block sales
rights as well, subject to various restrictions
designed to protect Ford from dilution of its stock
at a time when its stock price is already low.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Note A, the VEBA Trust will receive an
additional payment in each year
intended to compensate the VEBA Trust
for any transaction costs of selling
Payment Shares and any short term risk
due to stock price volatility.
In addition, the Applicant, the UAW,
and Class Counsel maintained that,
although Ford would have the unilateral
option to defer its payment obligations
under New Note B, there would be
sufficient conditions present to prevent
such option from being abused.
Furthermore, according to the UAW and
Class Counsel, the terms of the
settlement agreement(s) were heavily
negotiated by all parties to the
transactions, and the formula selected to
calculate the amount of Payment Shares
payable on a payment date under New
Note B provides protection for the
VEBA Trust from short-term aberrant
trading movements and is a fairly
standard method of measuring the value
of a stock-settled convertible instrument
trading in the marketplace.18
The Department takes note of the fact
that the 2009 Settlement Agreement was
negotiated by the responsible parties,
including the UAW and Class Counsel,
who believed that it represented the best
alternative that could be achieved under
difficult circumstances.
10. Other Important Terms Common to
the New Notes
Ford may prepay in cash either or
both of the New Notes in whole or in
part. For prepayments in whole, the
payment on each Payment Date shall
equal the corresponding amounts set
forth as a schedule to the applicable
New Note. In the event of any partial
prepayment, future payments shall be
determined, subject to the VEBA Trust’s
review and confirmation, on a basis that
provides the economically equivalent
present value and duration to the VEBA
Trust using a discount rate of 9% per
annum.
Furthermore, each payment under the
New Notes will be deemed a payment
of principal. Any payment not made, in
addition to any default implications,
earns interest at an annual rate of 9%
per annum, plus a default premium of
2% per annum from the due date to the
date of payment.
11. Warrants
Ford will issue Warrants to acquire
362,391,305 shares of Ford Common
Stock at a strike price of $9.20 per share.
The Warrants expire on January 1, 2013.
18 See pages 1–2 of ‘‘UAW Response to
Department of Labor Questions on New Note B:
Statement in Support of Prohibited Transaction
Exemption Application of Ford Motor Company,’’
submitted July 24, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
The exercise price and terms of the
Warrants are similar to the conversion
price and the conversion rights in the
Convertible Note provided under the
2008 Settlement Agreement, and are
intended to preserve to the Ford VEBA
Plan the option value embedded in the
Convertible Note by allowing the Ford
VEBA Plan to benefit from any
appreciation of Ford’s common stock
above the exercise price to the same
extent it would have under the
Convertible Note. The exercise price of
the Warrants is subject to adjustment
according to the terms of the Warrant
Agreement, including as the result of
share split, share combination, certain
dividends or distributions and certain
tender offers.
The Warrants are subject to a
restriction on transfer, in that they may
not be reoffered, sold, assigned,
transferred, pledged, encumbered, or
otherwise disposed of by a
Warrantholder except (a) in compliance
with applicable transfer restrictions, if
any, set forth in Section 2.2 of the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement, and (b)(i) to Ford or a
subsidiary thereof, (ii) pursuant to a
Ford registration statement that has
become effective under the Securities
Act, or (iii) pursuant to an exemption
from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act, including Rule 144
under the Securities Act.
Shares of Ford Common Stock
received by the Ford VEBA Plan upon
exercise of all or a portion of the
Warrants are also subject to restrictions
on resale under the Securityholder and
Registration Rights Agreement as
described further below. In addition, the
shares may not be reoffered, sold,
assigned, transferred, pledged,
encumbered, or otherwise disposed of
except (a) prior to October 1, 2012 if the
closing sale price of the common stock
was greater than 120% of the then
current exercise price for at least 20
trading days in the 30 consecutive
trading days ending on the last trading
day of the preceding calendar quarter or
(b)(i) to Ford or its subsidiary, (ii)
pursuant to a Ford registration
statement that has become effective
under the Securities Act, or (iii)
pursuant to an exemption from the
registration requirements of the
Securities Act, including Rule 144
under the Securities Act. Any shares of
common stock as to which the transfer
restrictions have expired may be freely
sold without limits.
In addition, Warrantholders will not
be entitled by virtue of holding
Warrants to vote, consent, receive
dividends, or exercise any right
whatsoever of a Ford stockholder unless
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
such Warrantholders become holders of
record of the underlying shares of Ford
common stock.
12. Rights and Restrictions Under the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement
Under the 2009 Settlement
Agreement, the Payment Shares,
Warrants, and Ford Common Stock
issued as a result of the exercise of
Warrants, as well as any Ford Common
Stock sold in connection with any
hedging transaction undertaken by the
Ford VEBA Plan, have certain
registration rights and are subject to
customary limitations and restrictions
on transfer, that are described below.
a. Registration Rights
Under the Securityholder and
Registration Rights Agreement, the
VEBA Trust is limited to two shelf
takedown or demand registrations per
year, and certain piggyback registration
rights, including limitations on the
aggregate sale of shares per quarter and
year of 250 million shares and 500
million shares respectively.
Additionally, the VEBA Trust is subject
to certain restrictions with respect to
Rule 144 and 144A sales and block sales
of Ford Common Stock, that are
designed to minimize dilution or
disruption to the voting power, of Ford
Common Stock.
b. Indemnification Rights and
Obligations
In addition, under the Securityholder
and Registration Rights Agreement, the
VEBA Trust, on behalf of the Ford
VEBA Plan, and Ford may be required
to indemnify the other party for certain
losses related to an offering of any
shares of Ford Common Stock that are
issued or issuable, as the case may be,
upon settlement of New Note B or
exercise of the Warrants (Registrable
Instruments). In general, Ford has
agreed to indemnify the VEBA Trust, on
behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan, to the
extent it is a holder of any such
Securities for all losses arising out of or
caused by any untrue statement or
alleged untrue statement of a material
fact contained in any registration
statement or offering document, subject
to the terms and conditions of the
agreement. Similarly, the VEBA Trust,
on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan, as a
holder of the Securities, has agreed to
indemnify and hold Ford harmless for
any losses arising out of or caused by an
untrue statement or omission included
or omitted in any registration statement
or offering document based on
information furnished in writing by the
VEBA Trust.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64723
The VEBA Trust, on behalf of the
Ford VEBA Plan, may also be subject to
a repayment obligation under the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement in the event that the
Independent Fiduciary determines to
withdraw any Registrable Instruments
from any ‘‘Shelf Offering’’ or ‘‘Demand
Offering’’ after having delivered notice
to Ford of its intent to effect an offering
of all or part of the Registrable
Instruments. Among other requirements,
the VEBA Trust must reimburse Ford for
all reasonable out-of-pocket fees and
expenses incurred in the preparation,
filing and processing of the withdrawn
registration in order for the withdrawn
request not to be deemed an offering
and counted against the offering limits
provided in such agreement.
The Applicant has requested
exemptive relief from section
406(a)(1)(D) of ERISA for these
indemnification and reimbursement
obligations to the extent that the Ford
VEBA Plan is a holder of the relevant
Securities and the payment obligations
are triggered. Alternatively, the
Applicant asserts that Ford’s
performance of its contractual
obligations under the Securityholder
and Registration Rights Agreement may
be a ‘‘service’’ rendered to the VEBA
Trust, and that the reimbursement of
certain costs is ‘‘reasonable
compensation’’ for such service, such
that the statutory exemption of section
408(b)(2) of ERISA applies to exempt
any such reimbursement from the
prohibitions under section 406(a)(1) of
ERISA, and the performance of such
service from the prohibitions under
section 406(a)(1)(C) of ERISA.
The Department is not proposing any
relief in connection with the Ford VEBA
Plan’s obligation to (a) indemnify and
hold Ford harmless for losses arising out
of or caused by an untrue statement or
omission in any registration statement
or offering document based on
information furnished in writing by the
VEBA Trust, or (b) reimburse Ford in
the event that the Independent
Fiduciary determines to withdraw any
Registrable Instruments from a ‘‘Shelf
Offering’’ or ‘‘Demand Offering’’ after
having delivered notice to Ford of its
intent to effect such an offering.
It appears to the Department that the
only representation that the VEBA Trust
could make to Ford for purposes of a
registration statement or offering
document is that it holds the Registrable
Instruments free and clear from any
liens.19 Thus, it seems unlikely that the
19 In discussions with the Department, the
Applicant was hard-pressed to point out any factual
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
Continued
08DEN1
64724
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
Ford VEBA Plan will have to indemnify
Ford pursuant to this obligation. ERISA
section 408(b)(2) may provide relief for
reasonable amounts paid to Ford if the
Independent Fiduciary withdraws any
Registrable Instruments from an offering
after it has announced its intentions to
effect such offering and Ford has
incurred costs as a result of the
Independent Fiduciary’s decision.
Ultimately it would be the
responsibility of the Committee to
determine whether the services
provided by Ford satisfy all of the
conditions set forth in the statutory
exemption and pertinent regulations.
c. Right of Ford To Purchase Securities
Ford also retains the right, under the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement, to make an offer to purchase
certain Securities that the VEBA Trust
intends to transfer to third parties. If at
any time the Independent Fiduciary
proposes to transfer any Warrants,
Payment Shares or shares of Ford
Common Stock received upon the
exercise of all or a portion of the
Warrants, subject to certain exceptions,
Ford will have an option for ten days,
after receiving notice of such intended
sale, to offer to purchase all or any
portion of the Securities proposed to be
transferred (the ‘‘Right of First Offer’’).
After receiving Ford’s offer, the VEBA
Trust will have ten days to accept the
offer. If the VEBA Trust does not accept
Ford’s offer, it may transfer such
Securities, subject to the other terms of
the Securityholder and Registration
Rights Agreement, to a purchaser on
terms and conditions that are not less
favorable to the VEBA Trust (and no
more favorable to the purchaser) than
those outlined in Ford’s offer, provided
that the transfer is completed within
one hundred twenty (120) days after
notice was provided to Ford.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
d. Hedging
The Applicant represents that hedging
is generally permitted only on Payment
Shares received by the VEBA Trust prior
to such hedging and with respect to no
more than 25% of the Payment Shares
deliverable by Ford on the next
succeeding payment date, subject to
satisfaction of the Stock Settlement
Conditions, in a manner consistent with
the then-existing registration rights
agreement and sales and time
limitations.
situations that would trigger the VEBA Trust’s
indemnification and reimbursement obligations to
Ford.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
13. Existing Internal VEBA
The Existing Internal VEBA is the
subaccount of the Ford-UAW Benefits
Trust that is maintained by Ford as a
source of funding for retiree health care
expenses. As of December 31, 2008, the
Existing Internal VEBA had an
estimated asset value of approximately
$2.7 billion.
Until the Existing Internal VEBA is
transferred to the VEBA Trust, the assets
will continue to be invested in a manner
consistent with its investment policy, as
may be amended from time to time.
Within 10 business days after the
Implementation Date, Ford will direct
the trustee of the Existing Internal VEBA
to transfer to the VEBA Trust all assets
in the Existing Internal VEBA or cash in
an amount equal to the Existing Internal
VEBA balance on the date of the
transfer. As described further below, the
Existing Internal VEBA will retain an
amount equal to the Existing Internal
VEBA’s share of expenses (to the extent
permitted by ERISA) subject to
reconciliation with actual expenses
incurred.
described above by the Ford VEBA Plan.
The second set relates to the exercise by
Ford or the Ford VEBA Plan of certain
rights and obligations pursuant to the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement. Finally, the third set of
transactions involves those transactions
between Ford and the Ford VEBA Plan
that may occur as a result of the
transition of responsibility to provide
benefits from Ford to the Ford VEBA
Plan under the 2009 Settlement
Agreement, such as possible extensions
of credit, reimbursement of expenses, or
the mistaken deposits of assets into the
Ford VEBA Plan.
With respect to the three sets of
transactions described above, the
Applicant states that the transactions
provide the only feasible method of
funding health care benefits for retirees
and their beneficiaries while preserving
the financial health of Ford. The UAW
and Class Counsel have joined in
supporting this request for exemptive
relief described fully herein.
14. Mitigation VEBA
The Mitigation VEBA was created in
connection with the 2008 Settlement
Agreement. Ford submitted an initial
application for an individual prohibited
transaction exemption relating to the
Mitigation VEBA on November 27,
2007.20 The Mitigation VEBA is
intended to be a source of ‘‘mitigation’’
payments to Ford UAW retirees to
lessen the impact of the new costsharing provisions implemented under
the 2008 Settlement Agreement. As of
December 31, 2008, the Mitigation
VEBA had an estimated asset value of
$54.4 million. Until the assets and
liabilities of the Mitigation VEBA are
transferred to the VEBA Trust for the
benefit of the Ford VEBA Plan, its value
will be affected by certain additional
contributions, investment returns and
mitigation expenses and payments. The
balance of the Mitigation VEBA is to be
transferred to the VEBA Trust within 15
days after the Implementation Date.
After transfer of the assets, the
Mitigation VEBA will be terminated.
(1) LLC Interests, New Note A, New
Note B and the Warrants
15. Covered Transactions
Generally, the Applicant seeks
exemptive relief for three sets of
transactions. The first set of transactions
involves the acquisition, holding, and
disposition of the employer securities
20 The Mitigation VEBA is the subject of
Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2009–28, 74 FR
49038 (September 25, 2009), which provided relief
for certain cash advances and ‘‘true ups’’ between
Ford and the Mitigation VEBA related to
administration of such VEBA.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a. Acquisition, Holding, and Disposition
of Ford Securities
The Applicant requests exemptive
relief from sections 406(a)(1)(E),
406(a)(2), and 407(a) of ERISA for the
acquisition and holding by the Ford
VEBA Plan of the LLC Interests.
Additionally, because New Note A, New
Note B and the Warrants will be held by
the LLC at the time the LLC Interests are
transferred, the Applicant also requests
relief for the indirect acquisition and
holding of the New Notes and Warrants
by the Ford VEBA Plan. Alternatively, if
Ford determines not to transfer the LLC
Interests to the VEBA Trust and instead
elects to transfer the New Notes and the
Warrants directly, the Applicant
requests relief from sections
406(a)(1)(E), 406(a)(2), and 407(a) for the
direct acquisition and holding of such
Securities by the Ford VEBA Plan.
Section 406(a)(1)(E) prohibits a
fiduciary from causing a plan to engage
in a transaction, if he knows or should
know that such transaction constitutes
the direct or indirect acquisition, on
behalf of a plan, of any employer
security in violation of section 407(a).
Section 406(a)(2) prohibits a fiduciary
who has authority or discretion to
control or manage the assets of a plan
from permitting the plan to hold any
employer security if he knows or should
know that holding such security violates
section 407(a).
Section 407(a)(1) states that a plan
may not acquire or hold any ‘‘employer
security’’ that is not a ‘‘qualifying
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
employer security.’’ Section 407(a)(2)
states that a plan may not acquire any
qualifying employer security (or
‘‘qualifying employer real property’’) if
immediately after such acquisition the
aggregate fair market value of employer
securities (and ‘‘employer real
property’’) held by the plan exceeds 10
percent of the fair market value of the
assets of the plan.
Section 407(d)(5) of ERISA defines a
‘‘qualifying employer security’’ as an
employer security that is either (i) stock,
(ii) a marketable obligation (as defined
by section 407(e) of ERISA), or (iii) an
interest in certain publicly traded
partnerships. Furthermore, a
‘‘marketable obligation’’ is defined, in
part, under section 407(e) of ERISA as
a ‘‘bond, debenture, note, or certificate,
or other evidence of indebtedness’’ if
immediate following the acquisition of
such obligation, not more than 25% of
the aggregate amount of obligations
issued in such issue and outstanding at
the time of acquisition is held by the
plan; and at least 50% of the aggregate
amount of such obligations in such
issue is held by persons independent of
the issuer. Lastly, section 407(e) of
ERISA requires that immediately
following the acquisition of the
obligation by the plan, not more than
25% of the assets of the plan are
invested in obligations of the employer
or an affiliate of the employer.
According to the Applicant, each of
the LLC Interests, the New Notes and
the Warrants represent a ‘‘security’’
under section 3(20) of ERISA. The
Applicant contends that, at the time of
the VEBA Trust’s acquisition of the LLC
Interests, the LLC Interests will be
‘‘employer securities’’ under section
407(d)(1) of ERISA because immediately
prior to the transfer, the LLC is a
wholly-owned subsidiary and an
affiliate of Ford.21 However, after the
acquisition has been completed, the LLC
will cease being an affiliate of Ford, and
the LLC Interests will no longer be
‘‘employer securities’’ with respect to
the VEBA Trust.22 Further, the
21 Section 407(d)(7) defines the term ‘‘affiliate’’
for purposes of identifying employer securities. It
provides, in part, that:
‘‘[A] corporation is an affiliate of an employer if
it is a member of any controlled group of
corporations (as defined in section 1563(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, except that
‘applicable percentage’ shall be substituted for ‘80
percent’ whenever the latter percentage appears in
such section) of which the employer who maintains
the plan is a member. For purposes of the preceding
sentence, the term ‘applicable percentage’ means 50
percent. * * * ’’
22 See DOL Opinion Letter 2003–14A (October 8,
2003) (securities ceased being ‘‘employer
securities’’ immediately following the completion
of an exchange of securities in which affiliate status
of the issuing company was terminated).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
64725
(2) Ford Common Stock
The Applicant requests relief from the
provisions of sections 406(a)(1)(E),
406(a)(2) and 407(a) of ERISA for the
Ford VEBA Plan’s acquisition or
holding of Payment Shares or any Ford
Common Stock acquired pursuant to the
exercise of all or a portion of the
Warrants, as the aggregate fair market
value of qualifying employer securities
held by the VEBA Trust may exceed the
10 percent limitation in section
407(a)(2) of ERISA (as described above),
resulting in a violation of sections
406(a)(1)(E) and 406(a)(2) of ERISA.
The Applicant asserts that, depending
on numerous factors at the time of
receipt of Payment Shares or upon the
exercise or all or any portion of the
Warrants, such as the price of the Ford
Common Stock, the investment
performance of the Ford VEBA Plan’s
assets, and the number of claims filed
under the Ford VEBA Plan, Ford
employer securities held by the VEBA
Trust may exceed 10 percent of the fair
market value of the assets of the Ford
VEBA Plan.
In addition, the Applicant is
concerned that Ford Common Stock
may cease to be ‘‘qualifying employer
securities’’ as defined under ERISA
section 407(d)(5) at one or more times
over the life of Note B, because such
stock may exceed the limitation
described in section 407(f)(1) of ERISA.
Section 407(f)(1) of ERISA provides that
an employer security constitutes a
qualifying employer security only if
‘‘(A) no more than 25% of the aggregate
amount of stock of the same class issued
and outstanding at the time of
acquisition is held by the plan, and (B)
at least 50% of the aggregate amount
referred to in subparagraph (A) is held
by persons independent of the issuer.’’
According to the Applicant, the VEBA
Trust, through a combination of
holdings of Ford Common Stock, Ford’s
payment of Ford Common Stock in
satisfaction of its obligations under New
Note B, and the exercise of the
Warrants, may hold more than 25% of
the outstanding common shares of Ford.
If so, Ford Common Stock held by the
VEBA Trust would no longer satisfy the
requirements of section 407(f)(1). The
Applicant therefore seeks exemptive
relief for the VEBA Trust’s acquisition
and holding of Ford Common Stock
acquired through the receipt of Payment
Shares or upon the exercise of all or a
portion of the Warrants, to the extent
such shares cease to be qualifying
employer securities at one or more times
over the life of New Note B.
The Applicant also expressed concern
that the Department may take the view
that the Payment Shares and shares
received upon exercise of the Warrants
constitute a separate class of stock due
to the transfer restrictions applicable to
them. As a result, Ford requests relief
from section 407(a) of ERISA for each
tranche of stock in the transaction.
Furthermore, the Department is
proposing relief from section
406(a)(1)(A), 406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) of
ERISA in the event that the Ford
Common Stock is disposed of in a
transaction with a party in interest.
23 See DOL Advisory Opinion Letter 94–31A n.4
(September 9, 1994) (‘‘In the Department’s view,
warrants to purchase employer securities generally
would not constitute ‘qualifying employer
securities’ under section 407(d)(5) of ERISA since
they are neither stock nor marketable obligations.’’).
(3) Extensions of Credit
The Applicant seeks relief from
sections 406(a)(1)(B) and 406(b)(1) for
the Ford VEBA Plan’s direct or indirect
acquisition of the New Notes, and with
Applicant notes that the LLC Interests
cannot be ‘‘qualifying employer
securities’’ at the time they are
transferred, because they do not
constitute stock, marketable obligations,
or interests in a publicly traded
partnership, for purposes of section
407(d)(5) of ERISA.
In addition, the New Notes will not be
‘‘qualifying employer securities’’ as
defined under ERISA section 407(d)(5)
at the time of their direct or indirect
acquisition by the VEBA Trust, because
neither New Note is a marketable
obligation. In this regard, upon the
direct or indirect transfer to the VEBA
Trust, it is expected that the VEBA Trust
will hold 100% of each New Note
issued and outstanding in violation of
section 407(a). Thus, neither of the New
Notes will constitute a ‘‘qualifying
employer security’’ at the time they are
acquired by the VEBA Trust.
Moreover, noting the Department’s
position in Advisory Opinion Letter 94–
31A, the Applicant contends that the
Warrants are not qualifying employer
securities, because they are neither
stock nor marketable obligations under
section 407(d)(5) of ERISA.23
Moreover, the Applicants note that
even if the LLC Interests, the Warrants,
and the New Notes are considered
qualifying employer securities, the
aggregate fair market value of employer
securities held by the Ford VEBA Plan
will exceed the 10 percent limitation in
section 407(a)(2) of ERISA.
Furthermore, the Department is
proposing exemptive relief from section
406(a)(1)(A), 406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) in
the event that the Securities, including
the LLC Interests, are disposed of in a
transaction with a party in interest.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
64726
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
respect to Ford’s deferral option under
New Note B. Section 406(a)(1)(B)
prohibits a fiduciary from causing a
plan to engage in a transaction if he
knows or should know that such
transaction constitutes a direct or
indirect lending of money or other
extension of credit between a plan and
a party in interest.
The New Notes constitute an
extension of credit between the Ford
VEBA Plan and Ford, a party in interest.
In addition, if Ford has satisfied certain
of the conditions necessary for the
settlement of New Note B in Payment
Shares (see Key Terms of New Note B,
supra.), then Ford may also have the
right under New Note B to defer such
payment and instead pay it over five
years, with 9% interest. If Ford is in
compliance with all of the settlement
conditions, Ford may have the right to
pay such deferred payment in Payment
Shares, and if Ford has only satisfied
certain of the settlement conditions,
Ford must contribute cash. Because the
deferred contribution can be paid in five
equal annual installments, the deferral
of a payment is tantamount to an
extension of credit from the Ford VEBA
Plan to Ford in the amount of the
deferred payment.
(4) Ford’s Deposits and Remittances
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
The Applicant also seeks relief for
Ford’s deposits to the Ford VEBA Plan,
and for the sale of Ford Common Stock
to the Ford VEBA Plan pursuant to the
Independent Fiduciary’s exercise of the
Warrants, in the event that any such
contribution is deemed to be a ‘‘sale or
exchange’’ of property between a plan
and a party in interest in violation of
section 406(a)(1)(A) of ERISA. The
Applicant believes that Ford’s
contribution to the Ford VEBA Plan of
the Securities could be deemed to
reduce an obligation that Ford would
otherwise have to the participants and
beneficiaries of the Ford VEBA Plan.24
In addition, because the Independent
Fiduciary’s exercise of the Warrants on
behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan would
take the form of a ‘‘sale’’ of property
(i.e., Ford Common Stock) to a plan
from a party in interest in violation of
24 In Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated
Industries, 508 US 152 (1993), the Supreme Court
held that an employer’s contribution of property in
satisfaction of the plan’s funding obligation was a
‘‘sale or exchange’’ for purposes of 4975(c)(1)(A) of
the Code, 26 USC 4975(c)(1)(A). Moreover, the
Department has held that an in-kind contribution to
a plan constitutes a prohibited transaction if the
contribution reduces an obligation of a plan sponsor
or employer to make a cash contribution to the
plan. See Interpretive Bulletin 94–3, 29 CFR
2509.94–3(c).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
section 406(a)(1)(A), the Applicant seeks
relief for this transaction.
b. Exercise of Certain Rights and
Obligations Pursuant to the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement
(1) Right of First Offer or Self Tender
The Applicant seeks relief from
section 406(a)(1)(A) for the purchase of
certain Securities pursuant to Ford’s
‘‘Right of First Offer’’ under the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement. Under the agreement, Ford
may purchase certain Securities,
including Payment Shares or Warrants,
that the VEBA Trust intends to transfer
to third parties in accordance with the
Right of First Offer or a Ford self-tender.
Section 406(a)(1)(A) of ERISA prohibits
a fiduciary from causing a plan to
engage in a transaction if he knows or
should know that such transaction
constitutes a direct or indirect sale or
exchange, or leasing, of any property
between the plan and a party in interest,
except as provided in section 408 of
ERISA.
Section 408(e) of ERISA provides, in
part, that the prohibitions of sections
406 and 407 shall not apply to the sale
by a plan of ‘‘qualifying employer
securities’’ if such sale is (A) for
adequate consideration and (B) no
commission is charged with respect
thereto.
The Applicant states that section
408(e) of ERISA may be inapplicable to
the sale of Ford Common Stock by the
VEBA Trust to Ford pursuant to its
Right of First Offer, because, as
described above, the shares of Ford
Common Stock to be sold to Ford may
be deemed not to constitute ‘‘qualifying
employer securities’’ at the time of such
sale by the VEBA Trust. In addition, the
Applicant notes that section 408(e) of
ERISA will not provide relief from the
prohibitions under section 406 of ERISA
for the sale of Warrants pursuant to
Ford’s Right of First Offer, because the
Applicant does not believe the Warrants
constitute ‘‘qualifying employer
securities.’’
c. Transition Payments and Mistaken
Deposits
(1) Mispayment of Benefits and
Reimbursements
Prior to the Implementation Date,
Ford and the Existing Internal VEBA
will bear responsibility for the payment
of benefits under the Ford Retiree
Health Plan to members of the Covered
Class and the Covered Group who
ultimately will be covered by the Ford
VEBA Plan. The Ford VEBA Plan will
have sole responsibility and be the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
exclusive source of funds for the
payment of retiree medical benefits to
the Class and Covered Group, with
respect to benefit claims incurred after
the Implementation Date.
Under certain circumstances related
to the transition, Ford, the Ford Retiree
Health Plan, and the Ford VEBA Plan
may extend credit or transfer plan assets
to each other in order to pay benefit
claims that are the legal responsibility of
one of the other aforementioned parties
(such other party, the Responsible
Party). The Applicant asserts that
mispayments and reimbursements are
likely to occur in the normal course of
operation due to the administrative
realities of health care payments and the
shifting of plan responsibilities between
multiple plans in a short period of time.
The following is an example of a
transaction that would require relief
under the requested exemption. A
member of the Covered Group receives
medical care on December 28, 2009,
thereby incurring a claim under the
Ford Retiree Health Plan. However, in
April of 2010, the claim is presented to
and paid by the Ford VEBA Plan. The
Ford VEBA Plan would be reimbursed
by the Ford Retiree Health Plan.
In such event, the Responsible Party
will reimburse the payor for such
benefits, plus interest. The Applicant
contends that payment by an entity of
benefits for claims incurred after benefit
responsibility has been transferred to
the Responsible Party constitutes an
extension of credit between such entity
and the Responsible Party that is
prohibited under section 406(a)(1)(B).
Payment by the Responsible Party to
such entity as reimbursement for these
paid claims constitutes a transfer of plan
assets to a party in interest that is
prohibited under 406(a)(1)(D).
(2) True-Ups for TAA Expense Accruals
The Applicant seeks relief from
sections 406(a)(1)(B) and 406(a)(1)(D) for
the payment arrangement established
under Section 12.D of the 2009
Settlement Agreement relating to the
accrual and subsequent true-up of
expenses associated with the TAA
through the date of transfer of the TAA
assets. The 2009 Settlement Agreement
provides that the TAA or Ford, as
applicable, will accrue and retain an
amount representing pre-transfer TAA
expenses. After payment of the actual
expenses, the accrual and actual
expenses will be reconciled. If there has
been an underaccrual, the VEBA Trust
is obligated to return the amount of the
underaccrual to the TAA or Ford, as
applicable. If there has been an
overaccrual, the TAA or Ford, as
applicable, will transfer the amount of
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
the overaccrual to the VEBA Trust.
Since the TAA is currently held by the
LLC and it is anticipated that Ford will
transfer its entire interest in the LLC to
the VEBA Trust on the Implementation
Date, it is expected that any overaccrual
or underaccrual of pre-transfer expenses
relating to the TAA will be paid to and
from Ford.
Since Ford is a party in interest to the
Ford VEBA Plan, the transfer of an
amount of assets of the Ford VEBA Plan
from the VEBA Trust to Ford for any
underaccrual constitutes the use of plan
assets by or for the benefit of a party in
interest in violation of section
406(a)(1)(D) of ERISA. Similarly, Ford’s
overaccrual and retention of cash after
the Implementation Date constitutes the
use of plan assets by or for the benefit
of a party in interest. Moreover, the
overaccrual or underaccrual and
subsequent reimbursement payment
between Ford and the VEBA Trust
constitutes a prohibited extension of
credit between the plan and a party in
interest in violation of section
406(a)(1)(B) of ERISA.
Similarly, Section 12.B of the 2009
Settlement Agreement provides that
within 10 business days after the
Implementation Date, Ford will direct
the trustee of the Existing Internal VEBA
to transfer to the VEBA Trust all assets
in the Existing Internal VEBA or cash in
an amount equal to the Existing Internal
VEBA balance on the date of the
transfer. The agreement provides that an
amount for trust expenses (to the extent
permitted by ERISA) through the date of
transfer will be accrued and retained
within the Existing Internal VEBA to
pay the expenses. Subsequently, a
reconciliation of the accruals and the
actual expenses will be performed. Any
overaccrual of expenses will be paid to
the VEBA Trust on behalf of the Ford
VEBA Plan. The VEBA Trust will return
any underaccrual to the Existing
Internal VEBA.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
(3) Mistaken Payments or Deposits
The Applicant likewise seeks relief
from section 406(a)(1)(D) of ERISA for
return of mistaken payments to the Ford
VEBA Plan, with interest.
Under the last paragraph of Section 12
of the 2009 Settlement Agreement, any
deposit made to the Ford VEBA Plan by
mistake will be returned (with earnings)
within 30 days of notice to the
Committee of the mistake, to the extent
permitted by law. The Applicant is
concerned that this could be viewed as
involving a prohibited transfer of plan
assets to a party in interest.
Accordingly, the Applicant requests
exemptive relief for this transaction.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
16. Conditions Related to the Transfer of
Ford Securities to the Ford VEBA Plan:
The Independent Fiduciary
Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, the
Committee will appoint an independent
fiduciary to manage the Ford Employer
Security Sub-Account (the Independent
Fiduciary). The Independent Fiduciary
will be a ‘‘named fiduciary’’ and
‘‘investment manager’’ as both terms are
defined in ERISA, with complete
discretion regarding the holding,
ongoing management, and disposition of
any Ford security (i.e., the Ford
Common Stock, New Notes, Warrants,
Payment Shares, and LLC Interests)
acquired and held by the Ford VEBA
Plan.
The Independent Fiduciary does not
have discretion with respect to certain
other aspects of the Securities. First,
because the Ford VEBA Plan will
acquire the Securities by virtue of the
2009 Settlement Agreement, the
Independent Fiduciary has no
discretion regarding the acquisition of
the Securities. Additionally, under the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement, the Ford Common Stock
held by the VEBA Trust must be voted
in the same proportion as votes cast by
other stockholders generally, and must
always be voted in favor of any
amendments to Ford’s governing
documents proposed in order to
facilitate the transactions contemplated
by the Securityholder and Registration
Rights Agreement. Therefore, the
Independent Fiduciary will have no
responsibility for the voting of the Ford
Common Stock.
The Independent Fiduciary must be
independent of and unrelated to Ford,
the UAW and the Committee.25
However, the fiduciary will be deemed
not to be independent of and unrelated
to Ford, the UAW, the Committee, and
their affiliates if (1) such fiduciary
directly or indirectly controls, is
controlled by, or is under common
control with Ford, the UAW, the
Committee or their affiliates, (2) such
fiduciary directly or indirectly receives
any compensation or other
consideration from Ford, the UAW or
any Committee member in his or her
individual capacity in connection with
any transaction described in this
exemption (except that an Independent
Fiduciary may receive compensation
from the Committee or the Ford VEBA
25 The Department notes that candidates for the
position of Independent Fiduciary to the Ford
VEBA Plan may be affiliated with entities that
provide services to Ford, GM, Chrysler, or their
affiliates. It is the responsibility of the Committee
to determine whether such affiliations are likely to
affect the judgment of the candidate in performing
its services as an Independent Fiduciary.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64727
Plan for services provided to the Ford
VEBA Plan in connection with the
transactions discussed herein if the
amount or payment of such
compensation is not contingent upon or
in any way affected by the Independent
Fiduciary’s ultimate decision), or (3) the
annual gross revenue received by the
fiduciary, in any fiscal year of its
engagement, from any of: Ford, the
UAW or a member of the Committee in
his or her individual capacity, exceeds
3% of the Independent Fiduciary’s
annual gross revenue from all sources
(for federal income tax purposes) for its
prior tax year.26
The Independent Fiduciary may be
removed by the Committee on 30 days
written notice only for cause.27 The
26 The Department notes that the preceding
conditions are not exclusive, and that other
circumstances may develop which cause the
Independent Fiduciary to be deemed not to be
independent of and unrelated to Ford, the UAW,
the Committee, and their affiliates.
27 Cause is defined in the Independent Fiduciary
Agreement as: (i) Any disqualifying event described
in ERISA section 411; (ii) determination by any
court, arbitrator or government regulatory body that
the Independent Fiduciary has violated any civil or
criminal law (including, but not limited to,
securities, antitrust or ERISA) in connection with
the performance of its responsibilities to the VEBA
Trust (for purposes of avoidance of doubt in
connection with this and the subsequent
subparagraph, a ‘‘determination’’ shall mean any
written judgment, order or decree; court-approved
settlement; arbitration award; or enforcement action
of a government regulatory body or SRO, in the
form of a written sanction, claim, demand or
opinion, whether or not appealable); (iii)
determination by any court, arbitrator or
government regulatory body that the Independent
Fiduciary has materially breached the terms of its
engagement, whether or not appealable; (iv) any
action by the Independent Fiduciary that results in
imposition of a civil or criminal sanction, any
prohibited transaction excise tax, or any civil
judgment or award of damages, on the VEBA Trust,
the Committee, the trustee, or their respective
employees, officers directors or owners (whether or
not subject to indemnity by the Independent
Fiduciary, an insurer, or any other person); (v)
termination, resignation, or death of the
Independent Fiduciary principal or officer assigned
to serve as the relationship principal with respect
to the VEBA Trust, or the inability of such person
to perform his or her duties for a continuous period
of more than 30 days; (vi) any change of ownership
of the Independent Fiduciary that constitutes an
‘‘assignment’’ of the Independent Fiduciary’s
contract with the VEBA Trust, within the meaning
of the Investment Advisers Act; (vii) failure of the
Independent Fiduciary to qualify as an ‘‘investment
manager’’ within the meaning of ERISA section
3(38); (viii) any change in the clientele, business or
ownership of the Independent Fiduciary that results
in an actual conflict of interest; (ix) failure of the
Independent Fiduciary to take into account the
legitimate needs of the VEBA Trust for liquidity to
pay benefits; (x) violation of any conditions
imposed on the Independent Fiduciary under the
terms of the prohibited transaction exemption
issued by the Department; (xi) any other action or
inaction of the Independent Fiduciary that the
Committee determines to be a material breach of the
Independent Fiduciary’s agreement or any law, or
is likely to result in an irreconcilable conflict; or
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
Continued
08DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
64728
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
removal will be effective as specified in
the written notice, provided that the
Independent Fiduciary has been given
notice of the appointment of a successor
Independent Fiduciary. No successor
will be appointed in the event the Ford
VEBA Plan ceases to hold any employer
security. In the event that the Ford
VEBA Plan subsequently acquires or
holds an employer security and no
appointment of a successor Independent
Fiduciary has been made, any court of
competent jurisdiction may, upon
application by the retiring Independent
Fiduciary, appoint a successor after
such notice to the Committee and the
retiring Independent Fiduciary.
The Committee delegated to a
subcommittee (i.e., three Committee
members) the responsibility to retain an
Independent Fiduciary on behalf of the
Ford VEBA Plan. The subcommittee
initially determined to proceed with the
assumption that the interests of each
plan whose assets are held by the VEBA
Trust would be best served by seeking
to retain a single qualified Independent
Fiduciary to represent all three plans
(providing health benefits, respectively,
to retirees of Chrysler, GM, and Ford).
However, the subcommittee recognizes
the possibility that engaging multiple
Independent Fiduciaries may turn out to
be the better option.
The subcommittee intends, as part of
the interview process for potential
candidates for the Independent
Fiduciary appointment, to question the
candidates on the nature and likelihood
of potential conflicts of interest, the
appropriate means of monitoring and
communicating actual or potential
conflicts, including whether the
candidates currently have formal
conflict monitoring procedures, and
mechanisms for dealing with actual or
potential conflicts as they are identified.
After reviewing the candidates’
qualifications, capacity to represent all
three plans, willingness to do so, and
other relevant factors, in consultation
with counsel, the subcommittee
anticipates making a final determination
as to whether to hire one Independent
Fiduciary or multiple Independent
Fiduciaries.
The subcommittee will work with the
Independent Fiduciary candidate(s) to
develop procedures to identify,
minimize and address conflicts of
interest as they arise. Specifically, in the
event that a single Independent
(xii) any circumstance that leads the Committee to
reasonably conclude that the termination of the
Independent Fiduciary and replacement by a
successor Independent Fiduciary is in the financial
interest of the VEBA Trust, provided that the
Committee documents the reasons for the
termination.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
Fiduciary is appointed, the
subcommittee will engage a ‘‘conflicts
monitor’’ to (a) develop a process for
identifying potential conflicts, (b) to
regularly review the Independent
Fiduciary reports, investment banker
reports, and public information
regarding the companies, to identify the
presence of factors that could lead to a
conflict, and (c) further question the
Independent Fiduciary when
appropriate.
Additionally, the subcommittee will
be prepared to replace the Independent
Fiduciary in the event of an actual and
irreconcilable conflict of interest.
Finally, the subcommittee will require
the Independent Fiduciary to adopt a
written policy regarding conflicts of
interest. Such policy will require that,
as part of the Independent Fiduciary’s
periodic reporting to the Committee, the
Independent Fiduciary includes a
discussion of actual or potential
conflicts identified by the Independent
Fiduciary and options for avoiding or
resolving the conflict.
A separate investment bank will be
retained with respect to each of the
three plans comprising the VEBA Trust.
The investment bank’s initial
recommendations will be made solely
with the goal of maximizing the returns
for the single plan that owns the
securities for which the investment
bank is responsible. If the Independent
Fiduciary deviates from such initial
recommendations, it would find it
necessary to explain why it deviated
from a recommendation, and such a
deviation may provide a basis for the
Committee or its designee to flag
possible conflicts of interest in advance.
Any contract between the Independent
Fiduciary and an investment banker
will include an acknowledgement by
the investment banker that the
investment banker’s ultimate client is an
ERISA plan.
The Independent Fiduciary will
comply with the following additional
conditions. The Independent Fiduciary
will authorize the Trustee of the Ford
VEBA Plan to dispose of Ford Common
Stock (including any Payment Shares or
shares of Ford Common Stock acquired
pursuant to exercise of the Warrants),
the New Notes, or exercise the Warrants,
only after the Independent Fiduciary
determines, at the time of the
transaction, that the transaction is
feasible, in the interest of the Ford
VEBA Plan, and protective of the
participants and beneficiaries of the
Ford VEBA Plan.
The Independent Fiduciary will
negotiate and approve on behalf of the
Ford VEBA Plan any transactions
between the Ford VEBA Plan and any
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
party in interest involving the Securities
that may be necessary in connection
with the subject transactions (including
but not limited to the registration of
Payment Shares, Ford Common Stock
received upon exercise of the Warrants,
or any Securities contributed to the Ford
VEBA Plan).
The Independent Fiduciary will
discharge its duties consistent with the
terms of the Ford VEBA Plan, the Trust
Agreement, the Independent Fiduciary’s
agreement, and any other documents
governing the Securities, such as the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement, and any successors to those
agreements.
The Ford VEBA Plan may not incur
any fees, costs or other charges (other
than described in the Trust Agreement
and the 2009 Settlement Agreement) as
a result of the transactions exempted
herein.
The terms of any transaction
exempted herein must be no less
favorable to the Ford VEBA Plan than
the terms negotiated at arms’ length
under similar circumstances between
unrelated parties.
17. Conditions Related to Mispayments
of Benefit Claims and Reimbursements
Given the rapidity of the shifts in
responsibility from the Ford Retiree
Health Plan to the Ford VEBA Plan, a
review of mispayments of benefit claims
may not be undertaken until at some
point following the Implementation
Date. The conditions for
reimbursements of mispayments require
the following procedure for audit and
reconciling payments.
The Committee and an independent
third party administrator of the Ford
VEBA Plan will review benefit
payments paid during the transition
period and determine the dollar amount
of any mispayments made, subject to the
review and approval of the VEBA
Trust’s independent auditor. The results
of this review will be made available to
Ford.
Ford and the applicable third party
administrator of the medical benefits
plan maintained by Ford to provide
benefits to eligible active hourly
employees of Ford and its participating
subsidiaries (the Ford Active Health
Plan) will perform similar reviews with
respect to the amount of mispayments
made. Ford will provide the results of
the reviews to the Committee.
Interest on any reimbursed
mispayment will accrue from the date of
the mispayment to the date of the
reimbursement. Interest will be
determined using the applicable
published ‘‘Official British Banker’s
Association Six Month London
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) 11:00
a.m. GMT ‘fixing’ as reported on
Bloomberg page ‘BBAM’ ’’ (the
published six month LIBOR rate).28
Any dispute as to the amount, timing,
or other feature of the mispayment and/
or reimbursement shall be settled in
accordance with the dispute resolution
procedure found in Section 26B of the
2009 Settlement Agreement (the Dispute
Resolution Procedure), which reads in
pertinent part:
(i) The aggrieved party shall provide the
party alleged to have violated this Settlement
Agreement (Dispute Party) with written
notice of such dispute, which shall include
a description of the alleged violation and
identification of the Section(s) of the
Settlement Agreement allegedly violated.
Such notice shall be provided so that it is
received by the Dispute Party no later than
180 calendar days from the date of the
alleged violation or the date on which the
aggrieved party knew or should have known
of the facts that give rise to the alleged
violation, whichever is later, but in no event
longer than 3 years from the date of the
alleged violation; and (ii) If the Dispute Party
fails to respond within 21 calendar days from
its receipt of the notice, the aggrieved party
may seek recourse to the District Court;
provided however, that the aggrieved party
waives all claims related to a particular
dispute against the Dispute Party if the
aggrieved party fails to bring the dispute
before the District Court within 180 calendar
days from the date of sending the notice. All
the time periods in Section 26 of the 2009
Settlement Agreement may be extended by
agreement of the parties to the particular
dispute.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
18. Conditions Related to TAA True-Ups
and Expense Accruals
Due to the nature of the expenses
charged by the entity in connection with
the management of the assets in the
TAA, the parties may not have accurate
measures of the TAA’s expenses at the
time of transfer of the TAA to the VEBA
Trust. As a result, the conditions for
expense accruals and true-ups require
the following procedure for audit and
reconciling payments.
Ford and the Committee will
cooperate in the calculation and review
of the amounts of expense accruals
related to the TAA, and the amount of
any overaccrual shall be made subject to
the review of an independent auditor
selected by Ford and the amount of any
underaccrual shall be made subject to
28 LIBOR is calculated by Thomson Reuters and
published by the British Bankers’ Association after
11:00 a.m. (and generally around 11:45 a.m.) each
day (London time). It is a trimmed average of interbank deposit rates offered by designated contributor
banks, for maturities ranging from overnight to one
year. The rates are a benchmark rather than a
tradable rate, the actual rate at which banks will
lend to one another continues to vary throughout
the day.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
the review of the VEBA Trust’s
independent auditor.
A claim by Ford for an underaccrual
must be made to the Committee within
the Verification Time Period, which is
defined as follows in Section VII(y) of
the proposed exemption:
The term ‘‘Verification Time Period’’
means: (1) With respect to each of the
Securities other than the payments in respect
of the New Notes, the period beginning on
the date of publication of the final exemption
in the Federal Register (or, if later, the date
of the transfer of any such Security to the
VEBA Trust) and ending 90 calendar days
thereafter; (2) with respect to each payment
pursuant to the New Notes, the period
beginning on the date of the payment and
ending 90 calendar days thereafter; and (3)
with respect to the TAA, the period
beginning on the date of publication of the
final exemption in the Federal Register (or,
if later, the date of the transfer of the assets
in the TAA to the VEBA Trust) and ending
180 calendar days thereafter.
Accordingly, any claim regarding an
underaccrual of expenses attributable to
the TAA must be made within the
period beginning on the date of
publication of the final exemption in the
Federal Register (or, if later, the date of
the transfer of the assets in the TAA to
the VEBA Trust) and ending 180
calendar days thereafter.
Interest on any true-up payment will
accrue from the date of transfer of the
assets in the TAA (or the LLC
containing the assets in the TAA), until
the date of payment of such true-up
amount. Interest will be determined
using the published six month LIBOR
rate described above.
Any dispute as to the amount, timing
or other feature of the true-up payment
will be settled through the Dispute
Resolution Procedure described above.
19. Conditions Related to Mistaken
Payments
In the case of a mistaken deposit to
the Ford VEBA Plan, Ford shall make a
claim to the Committee regarding the
particular deposit or transfer made in
error or made in an amount greater than
that to which the Ford VEBA Plan was
entitled. The claim must be made
within the Verification Time Period,
which is described above.
Accordingly, any claim regarding a
mistake with respect to transfer of the
LLC Interests, the New Notes, or the
Warrants must be made within the
period beginning on the date of
publication of the final exemption in the
Federal Register (or, if later, the date of
the transfer of any such Security to the
VEBA Trust) and ending 90 calendar
days thereafter. Any claim respecting a
payment made under the New Notes
must be made within the period
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64729
beginning on the date of the payment
and ending 90 calendar days thereafter.
Additionally, a claim with respect to the
TAA must be made within the period
beginning on the date of publication of
the final exemption in the Federal
Register (or, if later, the date of the
transfer of the assets in the TAA to the
VEBA Trust) and ending 180 calendar
days thereafter.
Interest on any mistaken deposit will
accrue from the date of the mistaken
deposit or transfer to the date of the
repayment. Interest will be determined
using the published six month LIBOR
rate, described above. In the event of a
dispute regarding the amount, timing or
other feature of the mistaken deposit,
the Dispute Resolution Procedure
described above shall apply.
20. Statutory Findings
The Applicant makes the following
statements regarding the Department’s
required findings under section 408(a)
of ERISA that the exemption is
administratively feasible, in the
interests of the Ford VEBA Plan and of
its participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the Ford VEBA
Plan.
The exemption transactions are
administratively feasible because they
are relatively simple and straightforward, easy to monitor, and involve
the management of the Securities by the
Independent Fiduciary.
The exemption transactions are in the
interest of the Ford VEBA Plan and of
its participants and beneficiaries and
protective of their rights because they
constitute the only feasible mechanism
to ensure that assets are dedicated to,
and held in the Ford VEBA Plan solely
for use as retiree health care benefits
(and reasonable related expenses). In the
absence of administrative relief, it is
doubtful that Ford could provide
alternate assets of equivalent economic
value. Furthermore, the final terms of
the 2009 Settlement Agreement,
including the Securityholder and
Registration Rights Agreement, and the
terms of the New Notes, were
thoroughly negotiated by a cadre of
advisers representing the UAW and
Class Counsel, each of whom has
endorsed the subject transactions and
fully supports the attendant proposal.
As the Applicant contends, the process
approving the settlement was rigorous
and adversarial, and it ensures that the
Class and the Covered Group receive the
best possible terms under the
circumstances.
As is contended by the Committee,
the rights of participants and
beneficiaries of the Ford VEBA Plan are
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
64730
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
not in derogation of, any other
provisions of ERISA, including statutory
or administrative exemptions and
transitional rules. Furthermore, the fact
that a transaction is subject to an
administrative or statutory exemption is
not dispositive of whether the
transaction is in fact a prohibited
transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemption, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in the
application are true and complete, and
that the application accurately describes
all material terms of the transaction
which is the subject of the exemption.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemption
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the Applicant and the Department
within 10 days of the date of publication
of the notice of pendency in the Federal
Register. Such notice will contain a
copy of the notice of proposed
exemption, as published in the Federal
Register, and a ‘‘supplemental
statement,’’ as required pursuant to 29
CFR 2570.43(b)(2). The supplemental
statement will inform interested persons
of their right to comment on and/or to
request a hearing (where appropriate),
with respect to the pending exemption.
Written comments and hearing requests
are due within 40 days of the
publication of the proposed exemption
in the Federal Register.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
protected by an independent committee,
and their rights with respect to any Ford
employer security are protected by the
Independent Fiduciary, both of which
will be subject to ERISA’s general
fiduciary obligations under section 404.
The Independent Fiduciary will have
the ability to dispose of the New Notes
as it determines it to be in the best
interests, and protective of the rights, of
the Ford VEBA Plan and its participants
and beneficiaries, so long as such sales
are consistent with (1) the reasonable,
agreed-to transfer restrictions imposed
on those Securities; and (2) the
registration rights provisions of those
Securities.
Proposed Exemption
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of ERISA does not relieve a
fiduciary or other party in interest from
certain other provisions of ERISA,
including any prohibited transaction
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of ERISA, which, among other things,
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(b) of ERISA;
(2) Before an exemption may be
granted under section 408(a) of ERISA,
the Department must find that the
exemption is administratively feasible,
in the interests of the plan and of its
participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemption, if
granted, will be supplemental to, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
Based on the facts and representations
set forth in the application, the
Department is considering granting the
requested exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act
and in accordance with the procedures
set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, subpart
B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10,
1990), as follows:
Section I. Covered Transactions
(a) If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A),
406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(E), 406(a)(2),
406(b)(1), 406(b)(2) and 407(a) of ERISA
shall not apply, effective December 31,
2009, to:
(1) The acquisition by the UAW Ford
Retirees Medical Benefits Plan (the Ford
VEBA Plan) and its funding vehicle, the
UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
(the VEBA Trust) of: (i) The LLC
Interests; (ii) New Note A; (iii) New
Note B (together with New Note A, the
New Notes); and (iv) Warrants to
acquire 362,391,305 shares of Ford
Common Stock at a strike price of $9.20
per share, expiring on January 1, 2013,
transferred by Ford and deposited in the
Ford Employer Security Sub-Account of
the Ford Separate Retiree Account of the
VEBA Trust.
(2) The acquisition by the Ford VEBA
Plan of shares of Ford Common Stock
pursuant to Ford’s right to settle its
payment obligations under New Note B
in shares of Ford Common Stock (i.e.,
Payment Shares), consistent with the
2009 Settlement Agreement;
(3) The acquisition by the Ford VEBA
Plan of shares of Ford Common Stock,
pursuant to the Independent Fiduciary’s
exercise of all or a pro rata portion of
the Warrants, consistent with the 2009
Settlement Agreement;
(4) The holding by the Ford VEBA
Plan of the aforementioned Securities in
the Ford Employer Security SubAccount of the Ford Separate Retiree
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Account of the VEBA Trust, consistent
with the 2009 Settlement Agreement;
(5) The deferred payment of any
amounts due under New Note B by Ford
pursuant to the terms thereunder; and
(6) The disposition of the Securities
by the Independent Fiduciary.
(b) If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A),
406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) of ERISA shall
not apply, effective December 31, 2009,
to the sale of Ford Common Stock held
by the Ford VEBA Plan to Ford in
accordance with the Right of First Offer
or a Ford self-tender under the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement.
(c) If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(B),
406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) of
ERISA shall not apply, effective
December 31, 2009, to:
(1) The extension of credit or transfer
of assets by Ford, the Ford Retiree
Health Plan, or the Ford VEBA Plan in
payment of a benefit claim that was the
responsibility and legal obligation,
under the terms of the applicable plan
documents, of one of the other parties
listed in this paragraph;
(2) The reimbursement by Ford, the
Ford Retiree Health Plan, or the Ford
VEBA Plan, of a benefit claim that was
paid by another party listed in this
paragraph, which was not legally
responsible for the payment of such
claim, plus interest;
(3) The retention of an amount by
Ford until payment to the Ford VEBA
Plan resulting from an overaccrual of
pre-transfer expenses attributable to the
TAA or the retention of an amount by
the Ford VEBA Plan until payment to
Ford resulting from an underaccrual of
pre-transfer expense attributable to the
TAA; and
(4) The Ford VEBA Plan’s payment to
Ford of an amount equal to any
underaccrual by Ford of pre-transfer
expenses attributable to the TAA or the
payment by Ford to the Ford VEBA Plan
of an amount equal to any overaccrual
by Ford of pre-transfer expenses
attributable to the TAA.
(d) If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(B),
406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) of
ERISA shall not apply, effective
December 31, 2009, to the return to Ford
of assets deposited or transferred to the
Ford VEBA Plan by mistake, plus
interest.
Section II. Conditions Applicable to
Section I(a) and I(b)
(a) The Committee appoints a
qualified Independent Fiduciary to act
on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan for all
purposes related to the transfer of the
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
Securities to the Ford VEBA Plan for the
duration of the Ford VEBA Plan’s
holding of the Securities. Such
Independent Fiduciary will have sole
discretionary responsibility relating to
the holding, ongoing management and
disposition of the Securities, except for
the voting of the Ford Common Stock.
The Independent Fiduciary has
determined or will determine, before
taking any actions regarding the
Securities, that each such action or
transaction is in the interest of the Ford
VEBA Plan.
(b) In the event that the same
Independent Fiduciary is appointed to
represent the interests of one or more of
the other plans comprising the VEBA
Trust (i.e., the UAW Chrysler Retiree
Medical Benefits Plan and/or the UAW
General Motors Company Retiree
Medical Benefits Plan) with respect to
employer securities deposited into the
VEBA Trust, the Committee takes the
following steps to identify, monitor and
address any conflict of interest that may
arise with respect to the Independent
Fiduciary’s performance of its
responsibilities:
(1) The Committee appoints a
‘‘conflicts monitor’’ to: (i) Develop a
process for identifying potential
conflicts; (ii) regularly review the
Independent Fiduciary reports,
investment banker reports, and public
information regarding the companies, to
identify the presence of factors that
could lead to a conflict; and (iii) further
question the Independent Fiduciary
when appropriate.
(2) The Committee adopts procedures
to facilitate prompt replacement of the
Independent Fiduciary if the Committee
in its sole discretion determines such
replacement is necessary due to a
conflict of interest.
(3) The Committee requires the
Independent Fiduciary to adopt a
written policy regarding conflicts of
interest. Such policy shall require that,
as part of the Independent Fiduciary’s
periodic reporting to the Committee, the
Independent Fiduciary includes a
discussion of actual or potential
conflicts identified by the Independent
Fiduciary and options for avoiding or
resolving the conflicts.
(c) The Independent Fiduciary
authorizes the trustee of the Ford VEBA
Plan to dispose of the Ford Common
Stock (including any Payment Shares or
any shares of Ford Common Stock
acquired pursuant to exercise of the
Warrants), the LLC Interests, the New
Notes, or exercise the Warrants, only
after the Independent Fiduciary
determines, at the time of the
transaction, that the transaction is
feasible, in the interest of the Ford
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
VEBA Plan, and protective of the
participants and beneficiaries of the
Ford VEBA Plan.
(d) The Independent Fiduciary
negotiates and approves on behalf of the
Ford VEBA Plan any transactions
between the Ford VEBA Plan and any
party in interest involving the Securities
that may be necessary in connection
with the subject transactions (including
but not limited to the registration of the
Securities contributed to the Ford VEBA
Plan).
(e) Any contract between the
Independent Fiduciary and an
investment banker includes an
acknowledgement by the investment
banker that the investment banker’s
ultimate client is an ERISA plan.
(f) The Independent Fiduciary
discharges its duties consistent with the
terms of the Ford VEBA Plan, the Trust
Agreement, the Independent Fiduciary
Agreement, and any other documents
governing the Securities, such as the
Registration Rights Agreement.
(g) The Ford VEBA Plan incurs no
fees, costs or other charges (other than
described in the Trust Agreement, the
2009 Settlement Agreement, and the
Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement) as a result of the
transactions exempted herein.
(h) The terms of any transaction
exempted herein are no less favorable to
the Ford VEBA Plan than the terms
negotiated at arms’ length under similar
circumstances between unrelated
parties.
Section III. Conditions Applicable to
Section I(c)(1) and I(c)(2)
(a) The Committee and the Ford
VEBA Plan’s third party administrator
will review the benefits paid during the
transition period and determine the
dollar amount of mispayments made,
subject to the review of the Ford VEBA
Plan’s independent auditor. The results
of this review will be made available to
Ford.
(b) Ford and the applicable third party
administrator of the Ford Active Health
Plan will review the benefits paid
during the transition period and
determine the dollar amount of
mispayments made, subject to the
review of the plan’s independent
auditor. The results of this review will
be made available to the Committee.
(c) Interest on any reimbursed
mispayment will accrue from the date of
the mispayment to the date of the
reimbursement.
(d) Interest will be determined using
the applicable 6 month published
LIBOR rate.
(e) If there is a dispute as to the
amount, timing or other feature of a
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64731
reimbursement payment, the parties
will enter into the Dispute Resolution
Procedure found in Section 26B of the
2009 Settlement Agreement and
described further in Section VII(c)
herein.
Section IV. Conditions Applicable to
Section I(c)(3) and I(c)(4)
(a) Ford and the Committee will
cooperate in the calculation and review
of the amounts of expense accruals
related to the TAA, and the amount of
any overaccrual shall be made subject to
the review of an independent auditor
selected by Ford and the amount of any
underaccrual shall be made subject to
the review of the Ford VEBA Plan’s
independent auditor.
(b) Ford must make a claim for any
underaccrual to the Committee, and the
Committee must make a claim for any
overaccrual to Ford, as applicable,
within the Verification Time Period, as
defined in Section VII(y).
(c) Interest on any true-up payment
will accrue from the date of transfer of
the assets in the TAA (or the LLC
containing the TAA) for the amount in
respect of the overaccrual or
underaccrual, as applicable, until the
date of payment of such true-up
amount.
(d) Interest will be determined using
the published six month LIBOR rate.
(e) If there is a dispute as to the
amount, timing or other feature of a
true-up payment in respect of TAA
expenses, the parties will enter into the
Dispute Resolution Procedure found in
Section 26B of the 2009 Settlement
Agreement and described further in
Section VII(c) herein.
Section V. Conditions Applicable to
Section I(d)
(a) Ford must make a claim to the
Committee regarding the specific
deposit or transfer made in error or
made in an amount greater than that to
which the Ford VEBA Plan was entitled.
(b) The claim is made within the
Verification Time Period, as defined in
Section VII(y).
(c) Interest on any mistaken deposit or
transfer will accrue from the date of the
mistaken deposit or transfer to the date
of the repayment.
(d) Interest will be determined using
the published six month LIBOR rate.
(e) If there is a dispute as to the
amount, timing or other feature of a
mistaken payment, the parties will enter
into the Dispute Resolution Procedure
found in Section 26B of the 2009
Settlement Agreement and described
further in Section VII(c) herein.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
64732
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
Section VI. Conditions Applicable to
Section I
(a) The Committee and the
Independent Fiduciary maintain for a
period of six years from the date (i) the
Securities are transferred to the Ford
VEBA Plan, and (ii) the shares of Ford
Common Stock are acquired by the Ford
VEBA Plan through the exercise of the
Warrants or Ford’s delivery of Payment
Shares in settlement of its payment
obligations under New Note B, the
records necessary to enable the persons
described in paragraph (b) below to
determine whether the conditions of
this exemption have been met, provided
that (i) a separate prohibited transaction
will not be considered to have occurred
if, due to circumstances beyond the
control of the Committee and/or the
Independent Fiduciary, the records are
lost or destroyed prior to the end of the
six-year period, and (ii) no party in
interest other than the Committee or the
Independent Fiduciary shall be subject
to the civil penalty that may be assessed
under ERISA section 502(i) if the
records are not maintained, or are not
available for examination as required by
paragraph (b) below; and
(b) Notwithstanding any provisions of
subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 504
of ERISA, the records referred to in
paragraph (a) above shall be
unconditionally available at their
customary location during normal
business hours to:
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department or the
Internal Revenue Service;
(B) the UAW or any duly authorized
representative of the UAW;
(C) Ford or any duly authorized
representative of Ford;
(D) the Independent Fiduciary or any
duly authorized representative of the
Independent Fiduciary;
(E) the Committee or any duly
authorized representative of the
Committee; and
(F) any participant or beneficiary of
the Ford VEBA Plan or any duly
authorized representative of such
participant or beneficiary.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Section VII. Definitions
(a) The term ‘‘affiliate’’ means: (1)
Any person directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with such other
person; (2) any officer, director, partner,
or employee in any such person, or
relative (as defined in section 3(15) of
ERISA) of any such person; or (3) any
corporation, partnership or other entity
of which such person is an officer,
director or partner. (For purposes of this
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
definition, the term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual).
(b) The ‘‘Committee’’ means the
eleven individuals consisting of six
independent members and five UAW
appointed members who will serve as
the plan administrator and named
fiduciary of the Ford VEBA Plan.
(c) The term ‘‘Dispute Resolution
Procedure’’ means the process found in
Section 26B of the 2009 Settlement
Agreement to effectuate the resolution
of any dispute respecting the
transactions described in Sections
I(c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (d)
herein, and which reads in pertinent
part: (1) The aggrieved party shall
provide the party alleged to have
violated the 2009 Settlement Agreement
(Dispute Party) with written notice of
such dispute, which shall include a
description of the alleged violation and
identification of the Section(s) of the
2009 Settlement Agreement allegedly
violated. Such notice shall be provided
so that it is received by the Dispute
Party no later than 180 calendar days
from the date of the alleged violation or
the date on which the aggrieved party
knew or should have known of the facts
that give rise to the alleged violation,
whichever is later, but in no event
longer than 3 years from the date of the
alleged violation; and (2) If the Dispute
Party fails to respond within 21
calendar days from its receipt of the
notice, the aggrieved party may seek
recourse to the District Court; provided
however, that the aggrieved party
waives all claims related to a particular
dispute against the Dispute Party if the
aggrieved party fails to bring the dispute
before the District Court within 180
calendar days from the date of sending
the notice. All the time periods in
Section 26 of the 2009 Settlement
Agreement may be extended by
agreement of the parties to the particular
dispute.
(d) The term ‘‘Exchange Agreement’’
means the Security Exchange
Agreement among Ford, the subsidiary
guarantors listed in Schedule I thereto
and the LLC, effective as of November
9, 2009.
(e) The term ‘‘Ford’’ or the
‘‘Applicant’’ means Ford Motor
Company, located in Detroit MI, and its
affiliates.
(f) The term ‘‘Ford Active Health
Plan’’ means the medical benefits plan
maintained by Ford to provide benefits
to eligible active hourly employees of
Ford and its participating subsidiaries.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(g) The term ‘‘Ford Common Stock’’
means the shares of common stock, par
value $0.01 per share, issued by Ford.
(h) The term ‘‘Ford Employer Security
Sub-Account of the Ford Separate
Retiree Account of the VEBA Trust’’
means the sub-account established in
the Ford Separate Retiree Account of the
VEBA Trust to hold Securities on behalf
of the Ford VEBA Plan.
(i) The term ‘‘Ford Retiree Health
Plan’’ means the retiree medical benefits
plan maintained by Ford that provided
benefits to, among others, those who
will be covered by the Ford VEBA Plan.
(j) The term ‘‘Implementation Date’’
means December 31, 2009.
(k) The term ‘‘Independent Fiduciary’’
means a fiduciary that is (1)
independent of and unrelated to Ford,
the UAW, the Committee, and their
affiliates, and (2) appointed to act on
behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan with
respect to the holding, management and
disposition of the Securities. In this
regard, the fiduciary will be deemed not
to be independent of and unrelated to
Ford, the UAW, the Committee, and
their affiliates if (1) such fiduciary
directly or indirectly controls, is
controlled by, or is under common
control with Ford, the UAW, the
Committee or their affiliates, (2) such
fiduciary directly or indirectly receives
any compensation or other
consideration from Ford, the UAW or
any Committee member in his or her
individual capacity in connection with
any transaction contemplated in this
exemption (except that an Independent
Fiduciary may receive compensation
from the Committee or the Ford VEBA
Plan for services provided to the Ford
VEBA Plan in connection with the
transactions discussed herein if the
amount or payment of such
compensation is not contingent upon or
in any way affected by the independent
fiduciary’s ultimate decision), and (3)
the annual gross revenue received by
the fiduciary, in any fiscal year, from
Ford, the UAW or a member of the
Committee in his or her individual
capacity, exceeds 3% of the fiduciary’s
annual gross revenue from all sources
(for federal income tax purposes) for its
prior tax year.29
(l) The term ‘‘LLC’’ means the FordUAW Holdings LLC, established by
Ford as a wholly-owned LLC to hold the
assets in the TAA and certain other
assets required to be contributed to the
VEBA under the 2008 Settlement
29 The Department notes that the preceding
conditions are not exclusive, and that other
circumstances may develop which cause the
Independent Fiduciary to be deemed not to be
independent of and unrelated to Ford, the UAW,
the Committee, and their affiliates.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
Agreement, namely (1) a convertible
note due January 1, 2013 with an
aggregate principal amount of $3.3
billion bearing 5.75% interest per
annum payable semi-annually (the
Convertible Note), and (2) a term note
due January 1, 2018 with a principal
amount of $3.0 billion bearing 9.50%
interest per annum payable semiannually (the Term Note).
(m) The term ‘‘LLC Interests’’ means
Ford’s wholly-owned interest in the
LLC.
(n) The term ‘‘New Note A’’ means the
amortizing guaranteed secured note
maturing on June 30, 2022, in the
principal amount of $6,705,470,000,
with payments to be made in cash, in
annual installments from 2009 through
2022, issued by Ford and referred to in
the Exchange Agreement.
(o) The term ‘‘New Note B’’ means the
amortizing guaranteed secured note
maturing June 30, 2022, in the principal
amount of $6,511,850,000, with
payments to be made in cash, Ford
Common Stock, or a combination
thereof, in annual installments from
2009 through 2022, issued by Ford and
referred to in the Exchange Agreement.
(p) The term ‘‘published six month
LIBOR rate’’ means the Official British
Banker’s Association Six Month London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) 11:00am
GMT ‘‘fixing’’ as reported on Bloomberg
page ‘‘BBAM’’.30
(q) The term ‘‘Securities’’ means (1)
New Note A; (2) New Note B; (3) the
Warrants; (4) the LLC Interests, (5) any
Payment Shares, and (6) additional
shares of Ford Common Stock acquired
pursuant to the Independent Fiduciary’s
exercise of the Warrants.
(r) The term ‘‘Securityholder and
Registration Rights Agreement’’ means
the Securityholder and Registration
Rights Agreement by and among Ford
and Ford-UAW Holdings LLC, effective
as of November 9, 2009.
(s) The term ‘‘2008 Settlement
Agreement’’ means the settlement
agreement, effective as of August 29,
2008, entered into by Ford, the UAW,
and a class of retirees in the case of Int’l
Union, UAW, et al. v. Ford Motor
Company, Civil Action No. 07–14845,
2008 WL 4104329 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 29,
2008).
(t) The term ‘‘2009 Settlement
Agreement’’ means the 2008 Settlement
Agreement, as amended by an
Amendment to such Settlement
Agreement dated July 23, 2009, effective
as of November 9, 2009, entered into by
Ford, the UAW, and a class of retirees
in the case of Int’l Union, UAW, et al.
v. Ford Motor Company, Civil Action
No. 07–14845, 2008 WL 4104329 (E.D.
Mich. Aug. 29, 2008), Order and Final
Judgment Granted, Civil Action No. 07–
14845, Doc. #71, (E.D. Mich. Nov. 9,
2009).
(u) The term ‘‘TAA’’ means the
temporary asset account established by
Ford under the 2008 Settlement
Agreement to serve as tangible evidence
of the availability of Ford assets equal
to Ford’s obligation to the Ford VEBA
Plan.
(v) The term ‘‘Trust Agreement’’
means the trust agreement for the VEBA
Trust.
(w) The term ‘‘UAW’’ means the
International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural
Implement Workers of America.
(x) The term ‘‘VEBA’’ means the Ford
UAW Retirees Medical Benefits Plan
(the Ford VEBA Plan) and its associated
UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
(the VEBA Trust).
(y) The term ‘‘Verification Time
Period’’ means: (1) With respect to each
of the Securities other than the
payments in respect of the New Notes,
the period beginning on the date of
publication of the final exemption in the
Federal Register (or, if later, the date of
the transfer of any such Security to the
Ford VEBA Plan) and ending 90
calendar days thereafter; (2) with
respect to each payment pursuant to the
New Notes, the period beginning on the
date of the payment and ending 90
calendar days thereafter; and (3) with
respect to the TAA, the period
beginning on the date of publication of
the final exemption in the Federal
Register (or, if later, the date of the
transfer of the assets in the TAA to the
Ford VEBA Plan) and ending 180
calendar days thereafter.
(z) The term ‘‘Warrants’’ means
warrants to acquire shares of Ford
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
share, issued by Ford.
30 LIBOR is calculated by Thomson Reuters and
published by the British Bankers’ Association after
11 a.m. (and generally around 11:45 a.m.) each day
(London time). It is a trimmed average of inter-bank
deposit rates offered by designated contributor
banks, for maturities ranging from overnight to one
year. The rates are a benchmark rather than a
tradable rate, the actual rate at which banks will
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
December 2009.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E9–29223 Filed 12–7–09; 8:45 am]
64733
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than December 18, 2009.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than December
18, 2009.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Division
of Trade Adjustment Assistance,
Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
November 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
lend to one another continues to vary throughout
the day.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64716-64733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29223]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
[Application No. L-11575]
Notice of Proposed Individual Exemption Involving Ford Motor
Company, Located in Detroit, MI
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed individual exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This document contains a notice of pendency (the Notice) before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of a proposed individual exemption
from certain prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act or ERISA). The
transactions involve the UAW Ford Retirees Medical Benefits Plan (the
Ford VEBA Plan) and its funding vehicle, the UAW Retiree Medical
Benefits Trust (the VEBA Trust), (collectively the VEBA).\1\ The
proposed exemption, if granted, would affect the VEBA, and its
participants and beneficiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because the Ford VEBA Plan will not be qualified under
section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), there is no jurisdiction under Title II of the Act pursuant
to section 4975 of the Code. However, there is jurisdiction under
Title I of the Act.
DATES: Effective Date: If granted, this proposed exemption will be
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
effective as of December 31, 2009.
DATES: Written comments and requests for a public hearing on the
proposed exemption should be submitted to the Department within 40 days
from the date of publication of this Federal Register Notice.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and requests for a public hearing
concerning the proposed exemption should be sent to the Office of
Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration,
Room N-5700, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington DC 20210, Attention: Application No. L-11575. Interested
persons are also invited to submit comments and/or hearing requests to
EBSA via e-mail or FAX. Any such comments or requests should be sent
either by e-mail to: ford@dol.gov, or by FAX to (202) 219-0204 by the
end of the scheduled comment period. The application for exemption and
the comments received will be available for public inspection in the
Public Disclosure Room of the Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-1513, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Comments and hearing requests will
also be available online at https://www.regulations.gov and https://www.dol.gov/ebsa, at no charge. Warning: If you submit written comments
or hearing requests, do not include any personally-identifiable or
confidential business information that you do not want to be publicly-
disclosed. All comments and hearing requests are posted on the Internet
exactly as they are received, and they can be retrieved by most
Internet search engines. The Department will make no deletions,
modifications or redactions to the comments or hearing requests
received, as they are public records.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Warren Blinder, Office of Exemption
Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, telephone (202) 693-8553. (This is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document contains a notice of proposed
individual exemption from the restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A),
406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(a)(1)(E), 406(a)(2), 406(b)(1),
406(b)(2), and 407(a) of ERISA. The proposed exemption has been
requested in an application filed by the Ford Motor Company (Ford or
the Applicant) pursuant to section 408(a) of ERISA and in accordance
with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
August 10, 1990). Effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of
Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, (43 FR 47713, October 17, 1978)
transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to issue
exemptions of the type requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Accordingly, this proposed exemption is being issued solely by the
Department.
[[Page 64717]]
Summary of Facts and Representations \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Summary of Facts and Representations is based on the
Applicant's representations and does not reflect the views of the
Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The Applicant
Ford and its subsidiaries have been engaged primarily in worldwide
automotive production and marketing operations. Ford designs,
manufactures, and markets vehicles worldwide, with its largest
operating presence in North America. Ford maintains its headquarters in
Dearborn, Michigan. As of December 31, 2008, Ford had approximately
71,000 active employees in the United States, of whom approximately
42,000 are represented by the UAW and other unions. Approximately
285,000 retirees and dependents in the U.S. receive retiree health
benefits from Ford, and of this total, approximately 196,000 are hourly
retirees and spouses, surviving spouses, and eligible dependents. As of
December 31, 2008, Ford had total assets on its consolidated balance
sheet of $218 billion.
2. Other Parties in Interest in the Covered Transactions
In addition to the Applicant, the parties in interest involved in
the covered transactions described herein are (1) the committee that
manages the VEBA Trust and is the administrator and a named fiduciary
of the Ford VEBA Plan (the Committee), (2) an independent fiduciary to
be engaged by the Committee to manage employer securities held by the
VEBA Trust (the Independent Fiduciary), (3) the trustee of the VEBA
Trust, State Street Bank and Trust Company (the Trustee), and (4) the
Ford-UAW Holdings LLC (described below). The role of each of these
parties is described in detail below.
3. Background
Ford historically has provided retiree medical benefits to former
UAW represented employees under the Hospital-Surgical-Medical-Drug-
Dental-Vision Program (the Ford Retiree Health Plan). On February 13,
2006, Ford and the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace
and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (the UAW) and a class of
retirees entered into a Settlement Agreement in the case of UAW v. Ford
Motor Co., No. 05-74730, 2006 WL 1984363 (E.D. Mich. July 13, 2006),
aff'd sub nom. UAW v. Gen. Motors Corp., 497 F.3d 615 (6th Cir. 2007)
(consolidated appeal) (the Hardwick I Settlement Agreement). The case
was brought to contest whether Ford has the right to unilaterally
modify hourly retiree welfare benefits for hourly retirees who had been
represented by the UAW.
Under the terms of the Hardwick I Settlement Agreement, a new
health benefit plan was established to mitigate costs shifted to the
affected retirees. The benefits provided under the new plan were to be
paid from a voluntary employees' beneficiary association (the
Mitigation VEBA) controlled by a committee independent of Ford (the
Mitigation VEBA Committee). The Mitigation VEBA was to be funded by
Ford through cash and other payments, and by contributions from active
Ford employees through wage deferrals and the diversion of cost-of-
living adjustments. The Hardwick I Settlement Agreement was to remain
in effect until at least September 14, 2011, after which either Ford or
the UAW could terminate the agreement and reassert its original
position regarding Ford's ability to unilaterally terminate retiree
health care benefits.
Despite entering into the Hardwick I Settlement Agreement, Ford's
retiree health care funding obligations continued to present a
significant impact on the Company's financial condition, which had been
exacerbated by recent global economic conditions. In addition, many of
Ford's competitors enjoyed a sizeable competitive advantage due to the
fact that they lacked the legacy expenses attributable to retiree
health benefits. For these reasons, in 2007 Ford announced its
intention to terminate retiree health care coverage for UAW represented
employees and retirees and its plan to terminate the Hardwick I
Settlement Agreement, in 2011. The UAW again contested Ford's
unilateral right to alter retiree health benefits, asserting that such
benefits were vested and could not be modified without consent.
Consequently, throughout October and November 2007, the parties
attempted to resolve the impasse through prolonged negotiations.
Ultimately, Ford and the UAW agreed to a permanent restructuring of
post-retirement medical benefits and the parties executed a Memorandum
of Understanding on November 3, 2007 (the MOU), under which benefits
would be funded through a new independent voluntary employees'
beneficiary association, the VEBA Trust. The UAW and counsel to the
class of plaintiffs (Class Counsel) in Hardwick I believed that the
retiree health benefits of the classes of plaintiffs would have greater
security if funded by the VEBA Trust, because it would be independent
of Ford. According to the Applicant, this belief was based on an
extensive study of Ford financial data, provided by Ford, which led to
the conclusion that in the event of a Ford bankruptcy, the assets in
the VEBA would have greater security.
Under the MOU, the Ford VEBA Plan and the VEBA Trust would assume
responsibility for post-retirement medical benefits commencing in 2010.
In exchange, Ford would deposit or remit $13.2 billion in assets (on a
present value basis, as of December 31, 2007) to the VEBA Trust. In
outlining benefits for retirees and the terms of Ford's payment
obligations, the MOU generally followed the pattern set by GM and
Chrysler in their bargaining with the UAW.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Under the terms of the MOU, UAW-represented employees hired
after November 19, 2007 were no longer eligible for retiree health
benefit coverage under Ford's retiree medical health plan or under
the Ford VEBA Plan funded by the VEBA Trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Despite the parties agreeing to the MOU, on November 9, 2007, the
UAW and a class of retirees (the 2007 Class) filed suit against Ford in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
(the District Court) challenging Ford's unilateral right to alter
retiree health benefits and asserting that such benefits were vested.
See Int'l Union, UAW, et al. v. Ford Motor Company, Civil Action No.
07-14845, 2008 WL 4104329 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 29, 2008).
Following another round of negotiations, Ford and the UAW agreed to
a proposed settlement (the 2008 Settlement Agreement). See Ford Motor
Co., 2008 WL 4104329. The negotiations included a comprehensive
analysis and evaluation of the parties' claims and defenses and of the
impact of rising health care costs on Ford's financial condition. The
agreement followed a pattern similar to settlement agreements reached
between the UAW and GM and Chrysler, respectively.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See UAW v. Gen. Motors Corp., No. 07-CV-14074-DT, 2008 WL
2968408 (E.D. Mich. July 31, 2008); UAW v. Chrysler, No. 07-CV-
14310, 2008 WL 2980046 (E.D. Mich. July 31, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Department's request, Ford, the UAW and Class
Counsel agreed to amend the proposed form of the trust agreement for
the VEBA Trust (the Trust Agreement) to clarify that the Committee,
which manages the VEBA Trust and is the administrator and a named
fiduciary of the Ford VEBA Plan, would be guided by the principle that
the Ford VEBA Plan should provide substantial health benefits for the
duration of the lives of all participants and beneficiaries when
determining the design of health benefits. After a
[[Page 64718]]
fairness hearing, the 2008 Settlement Agreement was approved by the
District Court on August 29, 2008 as fair, reasonable, and adequate.
See Ford Motor Co., 2008 WL 4104329.
The 2008 Settlement Agreement was intended to permanently resolve
the parties' disputes and satisfy and replace the prior Hardwick I
Settlement Agreement. Under the 2008 Settlement Agreement, based on the
framework of the MOU, Ford's obligations for providing post-retirement
medical benefits to the 2007 Class and a group of Ford active employees
eligible for retiree benefits (the 2007 Covered Group) would be
terminated and the Ford VEBA Plan would be established and maintained
by the Committee. The Ford VEBA Plan would be funded by the VEBA Trust,
which would be responsible for the payment of post-retirement medical
benefits to members of the 2007 Class and the 2007 Covered Group. Under
the terms of the 2008 Settlement Agreement, coverage and operations for
the Ford VEBA Plan would commence on the day following the
``Implementation Date,'' or January 1, 2010. Ford also agreed to
transfer assets to the VEBA Trust on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan with
an estimated worth of $13.2 billion, based on a present value as of
December 31, 2007.
As the economic environment continued to deteriorate in late 2008,
Ford decided to take further action to remain competitive with other
automobile manufacturers and to be able to operate profitably. Ford's
principal domestic competitors (GM and Chrysler) were being required,
under the terms of government-funded bridge loans, to reduce their
public unsecured debt obligations by two-thirds, to reduce by one-half
the cash expense associated with their retiree health care VEBA trusts,
and to achieve parity in labor costs with the U.S. operations of non-
domestic automobile makers. Notably, GM and Chrysler were required to
make payments to their employer-specific accounts in the VEBA Trust in
at least 50% employer stock. Consequently, Ford and the UAW amended
their 2007 collective bargaining agreement to allow Ford to reduce its
labor costs. The amendment was ratified by the UAW's membership and
became effective on March 16, 2009. On July 23, 2009, Ford, the UAW,
and Class Counsel entered into an agreement to amend the 2008
Settlement Agreement (the Amendment Agreement) by providing, inter
alia, that Ford may use Ford common stock (Ford Common Stock) to pay up
to approximately 50% of certain future obligations to the VEBA Trust on
behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan. The Amendment Agreement does not reduce
the present value of the assets to be provided to the VEBA Trust under
the 2008 Settlement Agreement, but instead altered the form and timing
of Ford's obligation to the VEBA Trust in a manner that facilitates
efforts to restructure Ford's debt and substantially reduce the risk
that Ford will default on its obligations to the VEBA Trust.
The revised settlement agreement (the 2009 Settlement Agreement)
took effect on November 9, 2009, upon the District Court's issuance of
an ``Order and Final Judgment'' granting approval to the Amendment
Agreement (the Order and Final Judgment), including approval of the
amendment to the Trust Agreement (the Trust Agreement Amendment) and
certification of the class under the modified class definition.\5\ The
2009 Settlement Agreement, inter alia, updates the definition of the
``Class'' under the 2008 Settlement Agreement to include individuals
who have retired since the 2008 Settlement Agreement or their spouses
and dependents (the Class) and are eligible to receive health care
benefits under the Ford VEBA Plan.\6\ The 2009 Settlement Agreement
also similarly expands the members included in the definition of the
2007 Covered Group (the Covered Group).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Int'l Union, UAW, et al. v. Ford Motor Company, Civil
Action No. 07-14845, (E.D. Mich. Nov. 9, 2009) (Doc. 71,
Order and Final J.).
\6\ The expanded definition of Class can be found on page 3 of
the 2009 Settlement Agreement.
\7\ The expanded definition of Covered Group can be found on
pages 4-5 of the 2009 Settlement Agreement. Notably, this definition
includes certain Ford Active Employees who had attained seniority on
or prior to November 19, 2007, and who retire on or after August 15,
2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. The Ford VEBA Plan and VEBA Trust
Under the 2009 Settlement Agreement, the UAW Ford Retirees
Employees' Beneficiary Association (the Ford EBA), acting through the
Committee, will establish and maintain the Ford VEBA Plan, subject to
ERISA, for the purpose of providing retiree health benefits to the
Class and the Covered Group on and after the day following the
Implementation Date, which will be December 31, 2009. Until then, Ford
will continue to provide retiree health care benefits to the Class and
the Covered Group at the same levels and scope as agreed to in the
Hardwick I Settlement Agreement. On the day following the
Implementation Date and continuing thereafter, decisions about benefit
levels are to be made by the Committee, which will have sole
responsibility to determine the scope and level of retiree health
benefits available to the Class and the Covered Group under the Ford
VEBA Plan.
The Committee is not obligated to design the Ford VEBA Plan to
assure that the assets in the VEBA Trust are sufficient to provide
benefits to all potential participants and beneficiaries in the Ford
VEBA Plan in all future years. Instead, the Committee's long-term
objective in designing the Ford VEBA Plan, absent countervailing
circumstances, is to provide ``meaningful health benefits'' to all
participants and beneficiaries in the Ford VEBA Plan.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Section 10.2(a) of the Trust Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acting through the Committee, the VEBA Trust was established on
October 16, 2008, by the Ford EBA, along with the UAW Chrysler Retirees
Employee's Beneficiary Association and the UAW GM Retirees Employees'
Beneficiary Association.\9\ The 2009 Settlement Agreement provides that
the VEBA Trust will be responsible for the payment of post-retirement
medical benefits under the Ford VEBA Plan to members of the Class and
the Covered Group the day following the Implementation Date. The VEBA
Trust intends to be qualified under section 501(c)(9) of the Code, as
amended, and comply as applicable with the Labor-Management Relations
Act of 1947, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 186, and will be subject to ERISA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The VEBA Trust consists of three separate employees'
beneficiary associations, each of which has a membership of the
applicable Ford, GM, and Chrysler retirees who may become eligible
to participate in each separate employee welfare benefit plan
established on behalf of the members of each respective eligible
group.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The VEBA Trust is structured to have three separate retiree
accounts, designed to segregate payments from each of Ford, GM, and
Chrysler, pursuant to the terms of each company's settlement agreement
with the UAW and the respective class. The purpose of each separate
retiree account is to serve as a segregated, dedicated account to be
used for the sole purpose of funding benefits provided under each
related new plan and defraying the reasonable expenses of each plan.
Each retiree account will also have a separate sub-account maintained
to hold any Employer Security \10\ and any proceeds from the
disposition of any such security. Assets from one separate retiree
account may not offset the liabilities or defray the expenses
attributable to another separate account. The VEBA Trust was
[[Page 64719]]
structured as a single trust with separate retiree accounts to allow
for the pooled investment of assets credited to each of the separate
retiree accounts and to provide economies of scale to the Committee in
providing services for each of the plans. Unless the Committee decides
to establish segregated investment vehicles for specific separate
retiree accounts, the assets of the separate retiree accounts, other
than any employer security sub-account, will be invested on a pooled
basis within the VEBA Trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The Trust Agreement, as amended, defines an ``Employer
Security'' as any obligation, note, warrant, bond, debenture, stock,
or other security within the meaning of section 407(d)(1) of ERISA
that is acquired or held by the VEBA Trust (or arising from any such
security through conversion).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ford is obligated to make certain payments to the VEBA Trust which
will be credited to Ford's separate retiree account under the VEBA
Trust (the Ford Separate Retiree Account). The Ford Separate Retiree
Account will accept the deposits, contributions, and remittances of, or
attributable to, Ford's payments and will pay benefits under the Ford
VEBA Plan, as described below. Any Employer Security contributed by
Ford to the VEBA Trust will be held in a separate sub-account (the Ford
Employer Security Sub-Account).
5. The Committee of the VEBA Trust
The Committee acts as the manager, plan administrator and named
fiduciary with respect to the Ford VEBA Plan, and it appoints the
Trustee, the Independent Fiduciary (as defined herein) and all
investment managers of the VEBA Trust's assets. The Committee may also
retain independent professional service providers that it deems
necessary and appropriate to administer the Ford VEBA Plan.
The Committee is comprised of eleven individuals, consisting of two
groups: six Independent Members and five UAW Members. The initial
Independent Members were approved by the District Court in the 2008
Settlement and the UAW Members were appointed by the UAW. The Committee
will function completely independently of Ford, which has no power of
appointment of the Committee's members. No member of the Committee may
be a current or former officer, director or employee of Ford, GM, or
Chrysler, except that a retiree who was represented by the UAW in his
or her employment with either Ford, GM, or Chrysler, or an employee of
any such company who is on leave from the company and is represented by
the UAW, may be a UAW Member. None of the Independent Members nor any
family members, employers or partners of an Independent Member may have
any financial or institutional relationship with either Ford, GM, or
Chrysler, if such relationship could reasonably be expected to impair
such Independent Member's exercise of independent judgment. Any member
of the Committee who is an employee of the UAW or a local union will
serve without compensation from the Ford VEBA Plan. Other members of
the Committee will be compensated for their services as provided in the
Trust Agreement.
The UAW Members serve at the discretion of the UAW and may be
removed or replaced, and a successor designated, at any time by written
notice by the UAW International President to the Committee. Independent
Members serve for a term of three years, except two of the initial
Independent Members will have initial terms of two years each, and two
other initial Independent Members will have initial terms of one year
each. An Independent Member may serve more than one term and will serve
on the Committee until his or her death, incapacity to serve,
resignation, removal, or expiration of his or her term. An Independent
Member may be removed or replaced, and a successor designated, at any
time by an affirmative vote of nine of the other members of the
Committee. In the event of a vacancy in the group of Independent
Members, whether by expiration of a term, resignation, removal,
incapacity, or death, a successor Independent Member will be elected by
the affirmative vote of nine members. If a successor Independent Member
is not appointed within a reasonable time after a vacancy, an
arbitrator may be appointed, upon application of any member, to appoint
a successor Independent Member to the Committee.
A majority of the members of the Committee then in office shall
constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting any business;
provided that at least one Independent Member and one UAW Member are
present. Each Member of the Committee present at the meeting shall have
one vote. Generally, for any Committee action to take effect, such
action must be approved by majority vote of the entire Committee,
provided that at least one Independent Member and one UAW Member cast a
vote with the majority. In the event of a vacancy in a class of
members, the majority of the remaining members of the class may cast
the vote of the vacant member. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any
change in benefits must receive the affirmative vote of nine or more
members.
The Committee will select a chair (the Chair) from among its
members. The term of the Chair will continue until he or she ceases to
be a member, resigns as Chair or is replaced as Chair with another
member by majority vote among the remaining members.
6. Ford's Role and Transition Issues
Ford represents that it will not be a fiduciary with respect to the
VEBA Trust or the Ford VEBA Plan, and will have no role in the
governance of the VEBA Trust. As noted above, Ford will not have the
ability to appoint any member to the Committee, and the Committee is
not authorized to act for Ford and is not an agent or representative of
Ford for any purpose.
Ford has agreed pursuant to the 2009 Settlement Agreement to
cooperate with the UAW and the Committee to undertake reasonable
actions as requested to assist the Committee in the transition of
responsibility for administration of retiree health benefits by the
Committee for the VEBA Trust and the Ford VEBA Plan. Such cooperation
may include assisting the Committee in education efforts and
communications with respect to members of the Class and the Covered
Group so that they understand the terms of the VEBA Trust and the Ford
VEBA Plan, the transition of benefit coverage, the claims process, and
other administrative changes undertaken by the Committee. At the
Committee's request, Ford has also agreed to furnish information to the
Committee as reasonably necessary to permit the Committee to
effectively administer the VEBA Trust and the Ford VEBA Plan, including
data maintained by Ford to the extent permitted by law. Any payments
made by Ford for this purpose will not reduce Ford's payment
obligations to the VEBA Trust on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan under the
2009 Settlement Agreement.
If requested by the Committee, and subject to reimbursement for
reasonable costs, Ford will continue to perform eligibility
determinations for the Ford VEBA Plan for a reasonable period of time,
not to exceed 90 days after the Implementation Date, in order to allow
the Committee to establish and test an eligibility database. Ford will
also assist the Committee in transitioning benefit provider contracts
to the Ford VEBA Plan.
To the extent permitted by law, Ford will cooperate with the
Committee to allow retiree participants in the Ford VEBA Plan to have
required contributions voluntarily withheld on a monthly basis from
pension benefits from Ford's pension plan covering members of the Class
and the Covered Group (the Ford-UAW Retirement Plan) and to the extent
reasonably practical, forwarded to the VEBA Trust to be credited to the
Ford Separate Retiree
[[Page 64720]]
Account of the VEBA Trust (the Contribution Withholding). A participant
may elect or withdraw consent for such pension withholdings at any time
by providing 45 days written notice to the Ford-UAW Retirement Plan
administrator or such shorter period as may be required by law.
Ford will also cooperate with the Committee to make provision for
incorporating the VEBA Trust payment of the ``special benefit'' of
$76.20 related to Medicare Part B premiums into the monthly Ford
pension checks for eligible retirees and surviving spouses
participating in the Ford VEBA Plan (the Part B Payment).
The Ford VEBA Plan will be responsible for the payment of
reasonable costs associated with Ford's administration of payment of
the Contribution Withholding and the Part B Payment. The Applicant
asserts that, to the extent that these payments are prohibited
transactions, the statutory exemption for the provision of services
provided by section 408(b)(2) of ERISA provides relief from the
prohibited transaction restrictions of section 406(a) of ERISA.
ERISA section 408(b)(2) provides relief for the ``[c]ontracting or
making reasonable arrangements with a party in interest for office
space, or legal, accounting or other services necessary for the
establishment or operation of the plan, if no more than reasonable
compensation is paid therefor.'' Under the Department's regulations, a
service is necessary for the establishment or operation of a plan if
the service is ``appropriate and helpful to the plan obtaining the
service in carrying out the purposes for which the plan is established
or maintained.'' 29 CFR 2550.408(b)(2).
According to the Applicant, the Contribution Withholding is helpful
to the Ford VEBA Plan as it reduces expenses associated with processing
participant contributions and investigating delinquent contributions.
This service is also helpful to participants as it assures that
contributions are received timely, without the need to mail a check
monthly to the Ford VEBA Plan, which thereby will assure continuation
of health care coverage under the Ford VEBA Plan for these
participants. Accordingly, the Contribution Withholding is appropriate
and helpful to the Ford VEBA Plan in carrying out its purpose because
it reduces expenses and aids in making sure participants receive
benefits without interruption.
With respect to the Part B Payment, the Applicant states that it is
appropriate and helpful to the Ford VEBA Plan as it allows the Ford
VEBA Plan to take advantage of an existing administrative process that
incorporates a defined, monthly payment to participants into pension
checks that participants are already receiving. This obviates the need
for the Ford VEBA Plan to develop its own administrative process for
this purpose and undertake the expense of mailing monthly checks to all
participants. Accordingly, the Part B Payment reduces expenses of the
Ford VEBA Plan, which helps conserve the amount of resources available
to provide benefits.
Furthermore, the Applicant represents that the costs of the
Contribution Withholding and the Part B Payment have not yet been
determined. However, the Committee will be subject to ERISA's fiduciary
responsibility rules when determining the cost structure, and the 2009
Settlement Agreement states that both services will only be provided to
the extent permitted by law, and a cost that is not reasonable would
not permitted by law.
In the Department's view, relief under section 408(b)(2) would be
available for these services provided the conditions of that exemption
are satisfied. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the Committee to
determine whether the services provided by Ford satisfy all of the
conditions set forth in the statutory exemption and pertinent
regulations.
7. Payments to the Ford VEBA Plan
As described in more detail below, on or following the
Implementation Date under the 2009 Settlement Agreement, Ford, the
Mitigation VEBA Committee, or the trustee of the Mitigation VEBA, as
applicable, are required, under the terms of the 2009 Settlement
Agreement, to make, on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan, the following
deposits or remittances: (a) Ford shall transfer to the VEBA Trust the
balance in the temporary asset account created under the 2008
Settlement Agreement (the TAA) as of the date of transfer or, at Ford's
discretion, cash in lieu of some or all of the investments in the TAA;
(b) Ford shall transfer to the VEBA Trust two notes issued by Ford (New
Note A and New Note B, and collectively, the New Notes) in an aggregate
principal amount of $13.2 billion, warrants to acquire 362,391,305
shares of Ford Common Stock at a strike price of $9.20 per share (the
Warrants), and any shares of Ford Common Stock transferred by Ford in
settlement of its first payment obligation under New Note B (Payment
Shares); (c) Ford shall direct the trustee of the Existing Internal
VEBA (as defined below) to transfer to the VEBA Trust all assets in the
Existing Internal VEBA or cash in an amount equal to the Existing
Internal VEBA balance on the date of transfer; and (d) the Mitigation
VEBA Committee, or the trustee of the Mitigation VEBA, as directed by
the District Court's Order and Final Judgment, is required to transfer
all assets and liabilities of the Mitigation VEBA to the VEBA Trust.
8. The TAA and the LLC
Ford created the TAA under the 2008 Settlement Agreement to serve
as tangible evidence of the availability of Ford assets equal to Ford's
obligation to the Ford VEBA Plan. The assets in the TAA, and the
investment thereof, are controlled exclusively by Ford and include all
investment gains/losses thereon from January 1, 2008, through the date
the assets are transferred to the VEBA Trust.
In addition, Ford established Ford-UAW Holdings LLC, a wholly-owned
LLC, to hold the assets in the TAA and certain other assets required to
be contributed under the 2008 Settlement Agreement, namely (a) a
convertible note, issued in April 2008 and due January 1, 2013, with an
aggregate principal amount of $3.3 billion bearing 5.75% interest per
annum payable semi-annually (the Convertible Note), and (b) a term
note, issued in April 2008 and due January 1, 2018 with a principal
amount of $3.0 billion bearing 9.50% interest per annum payable semi-
annually (the Term Note).
In late 2008, and under the authority granted to it in the 2008
Settlement Agreement, Ford caused the LLC to pay to it $2.282 billion,
the value of the assets in the TAA as of December 31, 2008, in exchange
for a note with a principal amount of $2.282 billion issued by Ford to
the LLC (the TAA Note). The TAA Note has an interest rate of 9% per
annum and a maturity date of December 31, 2009. In addition, Ford will
repay to the LLC a ``true-up amount,'' calculated according to a
formula provided in the note, to reflect a hypothetical investment
return on the TAA assets. Since December 31, 2008, Ford has deposited
into the TAA $529.1 million representing interest payments on the
Convertible Note and Term Note and payments due under the 2008
Settlement Agreement (Base Amount Payments).\11\ Ford is also required
under the 2008 Settlement Agreement to transfer, as the Committee may
request, up to $20 million from the TAA to the VEBA Trust to cover
expenses that will
[[Page 64721]]
be incurred by the VEBA Trust in anticipation of the Ford VEBA Plan
assuming responsibility for payment of benefits for the Class or
Covered Group until the Implementation Date. As of July 31, 2009, the
cash balance in the TAA was $581.2 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Ford is obligated to make annual ``Base Amount Payments''
of $52.3 million for 15 years to the VEBA Trust under the 2008
Settlement Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As soon as practicable after November 30, 2009 (the Exchange Date),
the Convertible Note, the Term Note and the TAA Note will be cancelled
and returned to Ford in exchange for Ford's issuance of the New Notes
and Warrants to the LLC, and Ford's obligation to make future Base
Amount Payments will terminate.
9. New Notes
As described above, under the 2009 Settlement Agreement, the Term
Note and Convertible Note, along with the TAA Note and the right to
future Base Amount Payments, will be exchanged for the New Notes and
Warrants (described in more detail below). The aggregate principal
amount of the New Notes and the amortization thereof represents the
equivalent value of (a) the principal amounts of and interest payments
on the Term Note, the Convertible Note and the TAA Note; (b) any unpaid
Base Amount Payments; and (c) an additional $25 million per year during
the period 2009 through 2018, which is intended to cover transaction
costs the Ford VEBA Plan incurs in selling any shares of Ford Common
Stock delivered pursuant to Ford's exercise of the stock settlement
option under New Note B.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Each of New Note A and New Note B represents approximately
50% of Ford's overall funding obligation under the 2008 Settlement
Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless Ford elects to prepay the amounts due under the New Note,
the payment schedule under the New Notes will be as set forth below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payment of note A Payment of note B
Payment date (million) (million)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 2009................. $1,268.47 $609.95
June 30, 2010..................... 290 609.95
June 30, 2011..................... 290 609.95
June 30, 2012..................... 679 654
June 30, 2013..................... 679 654
June 30, 2014..................... 679 654
June 30, 2015..................... 679 654
June 30, 2016..................... 679 654
June 30, 2017..................... 679 654
June 30, 2018..................... 679 654
June 30, 2019..................... 26 26
June 30, 2020..................... 26 26
June 30, 2021..................... 26 26
June 30, 2022..................... 26 26
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Key Terms of New Note A
New Note A is a $6,705,470,000 amortizing guaranteed secured note
maturing June 30, 2022. It does not bear interest except in the event
of a default in a scheduled payment. Payments are to be made in cash,
in annual installments from 2009 through 2022. The initial payment of
approximately $1.2 billion, due December 31, 2009, is significantly
larger than the subsequent payments, in order to provide the VEBA Trust
with funds from which to operate and pay benefits under the Ford VEBA
Plan.
New Note A is designated as Primary Second Lien Debt and Second
Priority Additional Debt in accordance with, and subject to, the terms
of a certain Credit Agreement dated December 15, 2006 with JPMorgan
Chase Bank (the 2006 Credit Agreement).\13\ As such, up to
approximately $1.5 billion of the principal payments made under New
Note A, and any interest from overdue principal payments, are secured
on a second lien basis with the collateral pledged under the 2006
Credit Agreement. Upon satisfaction of certain conditions, this second
lien security interest is partially reduced in 2017 and terminated
fully in 2018. New Note A is also guaranteed, subject to certain
conditions. It will be endorsed with an unconditional guaranty of
payment issued by certain direct and indirect wholly-owned Ford
subsidiaries (the Subsidiary Guarantors).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ It is anticipated that the LLC, as holder of the New Notes
(upon their issuance), will enter into an Intercreditor Agreement
that will set forth certain priority provisions between the LLC and
other second lien lenders.
\14\ The Applicant represents that the Ford VEBA Plan will pay
no fees to the Subsidiary Guarantors in return for their guaranty of
the New Notes. Therefore, the Applicant asserts that although the
guarantees are a prohibited extension of credit between the Ford
VEBA Plan and parties in interest, such guarantees are covered by
the class exemption granting relief for an interest free loan
between a plan and a party in interest. PTE 80-26, as amended (71 FR
17917 (April 7, 2006)) (Interest-Free Loans). In the Department's
view, relief under PTE 80-26 would be available for the guarantees
provided the conditions of that exemption are satisfied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Note A is transferable, subject to limited restrictions. It may
not be reoffered, sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, encumbered or
otherwise disposed of by the holder except (a) to the VEBA Trust
pursuant to the 2009 Settlement Agreement, (b) to Ford or a subsidiary
thereof, (c) pursuant to a Ford registration statement that has become
effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the Securities
Act) or (d) pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by Rule
144 under the Securities Act or any other available exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act.
However, the VEBA Trust may assign or transfer all or any portion
of New Note A provided that (a) the amount of the assignment or
transfer must at least be in an initial principal amount of
$250,000,000, or if in excess thereof in an initial principal amount of
a multiple of $100,000,000; (b) the assignment or transfer is not in
violation of applicable law; (c) Ford and its Subsidiary Guarantors
receive a written agreement from the assignee or transferee to
undertake the representations, warranties and covenants of the holder
included in the Securities Exchange Agreement; and (d) sufficient
notice and evidence of compliance with the transfer or assignment
conditions is given to Ford.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Section 5 of the Securities Exchange Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Key Terms of New Note B
New Note B is a $6,511,850,000 amortizing guaranteed secured note
maturing June 30, 2022. It does not bear
[[Page 64722]]
interest except in the event of a default in a scheduled payment. The
initial principal amount is to be repaid according to the agreed-upon
schedule of fourteen annual payments set forth above with an initial
payment date on December 31, 2009.
New Note B is also designated as Primary Second Lien Debt and
Second Priority Additional Debt in accordance with, and subject to, the
terms of the 2006 Credit Agreement. As such, up to approximately $1.5
billion of the principal payments made under New Note B, and any
interest from overdue principal payments, are secured on a second lien
basis with the collateral pledged under the 2006 Credit Agreement. Upon
the satisfaction of certain conditions, this second lien security
interest is partially reduced in 2017 and terminated in its entirety
2018. Additionally, New Note B is guaranteed in accordance with
substantially identical terms as are described above for New Note
A.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Footnote 14 regarding the applicability of PTE 80-26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On each New Note B payment date, subject to satisfaction of all of
the Stock Settlement Conditions (described below), Ford has the option
to settle any or all of the amount due with respect to New Note B with
Ford Common Stock designated as ``Payment Shares'' of equal value,
determined based on the volume-weighted average selling price per share
of Ford Common Stock for the 30 trading-day period ending on the second
business day prior to the relevant payment date. Such Payment Shares
will be subject to certain registration rights and transfer
restrictions, as described herein.
Ford's option to settle any or all portion of the amounts due with
respect to New Note B by delivering Payment Shares is subject in each
instance to the satisfaction of the following Stock Settlement
Conditions on the applicable payment date:
1. No event of default has occurred under Ford's outstanding
public debt securities, bank credit facilities, or notes or other
securities issued to the VEBA Trust, and Ford has paid all amounts
due on or prior to such payment date on New Note A and New Note B
(in cash, or through the exercise of the stock payment option with
respect to any payment or portion thereof or the deferral of any
payment or portion thereof as described below, as applicable);
2. No bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding has been commenced by
or against Ford;
3. Ford has made no assignment for benefit of creditors or
admission of general inability to pay debts;
4. Ford Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) or other national securities exchange on the payment date,
and the NYSE (or such other securities exchange) has not commenced
or provided notice of the commencement of any delisting proceedings
or inquiries on or prior to the payment date;
5. No judgment in excess of a specified amount has remained
unsatisfied and unstayed for more than 30 days;
6. No ``termination event'' (as defined by ERISA) has occurred
with respect to either of Ford's two major U.S. defined benefit
pension plans;
7. Ford has received no audit opinion containing a going concern
explanatory paragraph for the fiscal year immediately preceding the
applicable payment date; and
8. The price per share of Ford Common Stock is greater than
$1.00 (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments).
Furthermore, if on any payment date under New Note B, conditions
1., 2., 3., 5., and 6. are met, then, subject to certain limitations,
Ford would generally have the right to defer such payment by paying it
in up to five equal annual installments beginning with the next
scheduled payment date, with interest accruing at 9% beginning on the
date such payment was originally due and continuing through the date
such payment is made. Thus, Ford may make such payment (or installment
thereof) in common stock on any deferred installment date if all the
conditions for payment in common stock have been met on such date.
c. Department's Concerns Regarding New Note B
The Department raised the issue of Ford's discretion under New Note
B with Ford, the UAW, and Class Counsel and received the unanimous
response that the terms would not unduly disadvantage participants or
beneficiaries of the VEBA Trust. The Applicant asserted that, although
the Payment Shares will initially be unregistered, the VEBA Trust will
likely be able to sell the shares with minimal delay, thus the
difference in price between the unregistered Payment Shares and
publicly traded Ford Common Stock would be negligible.\17\ Furthermore,
under the terms of New Note A, the VEBA Trust will receive an
additional payment in each year intended to compensate the VEBA Trust
for any transaction costs of selling Payment Shares and any short term
risk due to stock price volatility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Section 5.01 of the Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement by and among Ford and Ford-UAW Holdings LLC, effective as
of November 9, 2009 (the Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement), obligates Ford to establish a shelf registration as soon
as possible following the delivery of the New Notes. Since Ford is a
well-known seasoned issuer for purposes of the Securities Exchange
Act, the shelf registration should be effective immediately upon
filing, allowing the VEBA Trust to sell shares immediately following
their receipt. In addition, the VEBA Trust has certain other
piggyback registration rights, rights under Rule 144 and 144A, and
block sales rights as well, subject to various restrictions designed
to protect Ford from dilution of its stock at a time when its stock
price is already low.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Applicant, the UAW, and Class Counsel maintained
that, although Ford would have the unilateral option to defer its
payment obligations under New Note B, there would be sufficient
conditions present to prevent such option from being abused.
Furthermore, according to the UAW and Class Counsel, the terms of the
settlement agreement(s) were heavily negotiated by all parties to the
transactions, and the formula selected to calculate the amount of
Payment Shares payable on a payment date under New Note B provides
protection for the VEBA Trust from short-term aberrant trading
movements and is a fairly standard method of measuring the value of a
stock-settled convertible instrument trading in the marketplace.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See pages 1-2 of ``UAW Response to Department of Labor
Questions on New Note B: Statement in Support of Prohibited
Transaction Exemption Application of Ford Motor Company,'' submitted
July 24, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department takes note of the fact that the 2009 Settlement
Agreement was negotiated by the responsible parties, including the UAW
and Class Counsel, who believed that it represented the best
alternative that could be achieved under difficult circumstances.
10. Other Important Terms Common to the New Notes
Ford may prepay in cash either or both of the New Notes in whole or
in part. For prepayments in whole, the payment on each Payment Date
shall equal the corresponding amounts set forth as a schedule to the
applicable New Note. In the event of any partial prepayment, future
payments shall be determined, subject to the VEBA Trust's review and
confirmation, on a basis that provides the economically equivalent
present value and duration to the VEBA Trust using a discount rate of
9% per annum.
Furthermore, each payment under the New Notes will be deemed a
payment of principal. Any payment not made, in addition to any default
implications, earns interest at an annual rate of 9% per annum, plus a
default premium of 2% per annum from the due date to the date of
payment.
11. Warrants
Ford will issue Warrants to acquire 362,391,305 shares of Ford
Common Stock at a strike price of $9.20 per share. The Warrants expire
on January 1, 2013.
[[Page 64723]]
The exercise price and terms of the Warrants are similar to the
conversion price and the conversion rights in the Convertible Note
provided under the 2008 Settlement Agreement, and are intended to
preserve to the Ford VEBA Plan the option value embedded in the
Convertible Note by allowing the Ford VEBA Plan to benefit from any
appreciation of Ford's common stock above the exercise price to the
same extent it would have under the Convertible Note. The exercise
price of the Warrants is subject to adjustment according to the terms
of the Warrant Agreement, including as the result of share split, share
combination, certain dividends or distributions and certain tender
offers.
The Warrants are subject to a restriction on transfer, in that they
may not be reoffered, sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, encumbered,
or otherwise disposed of by a Warrantholder except (a) in compliance
with applicable transfer restrictions, if any, set forth in Section 2.2
of the Securityholder and Registration Rights Agreement, and (b)(i) to
Ford or a subsidiary thereof, (ii) pursuant to a Ford registration
statement that has become effective under the Securities Act, or (iii)
pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act, including Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
Shares of Ford Common Stock received by the Ford VEBA Plan upon
exercise of all or a portion of the Warrants are also subject to
restrictions on resale under the Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement as described further below. In addition, the shares may not
be reoffered, sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, encumbered, or
otherwise disposed of except (a) prior to October 1, 2012 if the
closing sale price of the common stock was greater than 120% of the
then current exercise price for at least 20 trading days in the 30
consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
preceding calendar quarter or (b)(i) to Ford or its subsidiary, (ii)
pursuant to a Ford registration statement that has become effective
under the Securities Act, or (iii) pursuant to an exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act, including Rule 144
under the Securities Act. Any shares of common stock as to which the
transfer restrictions have expired may be freely sold without limits.
In addition, Warrantholders will not be entitled by virtue of
holding Warrants to vote, consent, receive dividends, or exercise any
right whatsoever of a Ford stockholder unless such Warrantholders
become holders of record of the underlying shares of Ford common stock.
12. Rights and Restrictions Under the Securityholder and Registration
Rights Agreement
Under the 2009 Settlement Agreement, the Payment Shares, Warrants,
and Ford Common Stock issued as a result of the exercise of Warrants,
as well as any Ford Common Stock sold in connection with any hedging
transaction undertaken by the Ford VEBA Plan, have certain registration
rights and are subject to customary limitations and restrictions on
transfer, that are described below.
a. Registration Rights
Under the Securityholder and Registration Rights Agreement, the
VEBA Trust is limited to two shelf takedown or demand registrations per
year, and certain piggyback registration rights, including limitations
on the aggregate sale of shares per quarter and year of 250 million
shares and 500 million shares respectively. Additionally, the VEBA
Trust is subject to certain restrictions with respect to Rule 144 and
144A sales and block sales of Ford Common Stock, that are designed to
minimize dilution or disruption to the voting power, of Ford Common
Stock.
b. Indemnification Rights and Obligations
In addition, under the Securityholder and Registration Rights
Agreement, the VEBA Trust, on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan, and Ford
may be required to indemnify the other party for certain losses related
to an offering of any shares of Ford Common Stock that are issued or
issuable, as the case may be, upon settlement of New Note B or exercise
of the Warrants (Registrable Instruments). In general, Ford has agreed
to indemnify the VEBA Trust, on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan, to the
extent it is a holder of any such Securities for all losses arising out
of or caused by any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a
material fact contained in any registration statement or offering
document, subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement.
Similarly, the VEBA Trust, on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan, as a holder
of the Securities, has agreed to indemnify and hold Ford harmless for
any losses arising out of or caused by an untrue statement or omission
included or omitted in any registration statement or offering document
based on information furnished in writing by the VEBA Trust.
The VEBA Trust, on behalf of the Ford VEBA Plan, may also be
subject to a repayment obligation under the Securityholder and
Registration Rights Agreement in the event that the Independent
Fiduciary determines to withdraw any Registrable Instruments from any
``Shelf Offering'' or ``Demand Offering'' after having delivered notice
to Ford of its intent to effect an offering of all or part of the
Registrable Instruments. Among other requirements, the VEBA Trust must
reimburse Ford for all reasonable out-of-pocket fees and expenses
incurred in the preparation, filing and processing of the withdrawn
registration in order for the withdrawn request not to be deemed an
offering and counted against the offering limits provided in such
agreement.
The Applicant has requested exemptive relief from section
406(a)(1)(D) of ERISA for these indemnification and reimbursement
obligations to the extent that the Ford VEBA Plan is a holder of the
relevant Securities and the payment obligations are triggered.
Alternatively, the Applicant asserts that Ford's performance of its
contractual obligations under the Securityholder and Registration
Rights Agreement may be a ``service'' rendered to the VEBA Trust, and
that the reimbursement of certain costs is ``reasonable compensation''
for such service, such that the statutory exemption of section
408(b)(2) of ERISA applies to exempt any such reimbursement from the
prohibitions under section 406(a)(1) of ERISA, and the performance of
such service from the prohibitions under section 406(a)(1)(C) of ERISA.
The Department is not proposing any relief in connection with the
Ford VEBA Plan's obligation to (a) indemnify and hold Ford harmless for
losses arising out of or caused by an untrue statement or omission in
any registration statement or offering document based on information
furnished in writing by the VEBA Trust, or (b) reimburse Ford in the
event that the Independent Fiduciary determines to withdraw any
Registrable Instruments from a ``Shelf Offering'' or ``Demand
Offering'' after having delivered notice to Ford of its intent to
effect such an offering.
It appears to the Department that the only representation that the
VEBA Trust could make to Ford for purposes of a registration statement
or offering document is that it holds the Registrable Instruments free
and clear from any liens.\19\ Thus, it seems unlikely that the
[[Page 64724]]
Ford VEBA Plan will have to indemnify Ford pursuant to this obligation.
ERISA section 408(b)(2) may provide relief for reasonable amounts paid
to Ford if the Independent Fiduciary withdraws any Registrable
Instruments from an offering after it has announced its intentions to
effect such offering and Ford has incurred costs as a result of the
Independent Fiduciary's decision. Ultimately it would be the
responsibility of the Committee to determine whether the services
provided by Ford satisfy all of the conditions set forth in the
statutory exemption and pertinent regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ In discussions with the Department, the Applicant was hard-
pressed to point out any factual situations that would trigger the
VEBA Trust's indemnification and reimbursement obligations to Ford.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Right of Ford To Purchase Securities
Ford also retains the right, under the Securityholder and
Registration Rights Agreement, to make an offer to purchase certain
Securities that the VEBA Trust intends to transfer to third parties. If
at any time the Independent Fiduciary proposes to transfer any
Warrants, Payment Shares or shares of Ford Common Stock received upon
the exercise of all or a portion of the Warrants, subject to certain
exceptions, Ford will have an option for ten days, after receiving
notice of such intended sale, to offer to purchase all or any portion
of the Securities proposed to be transferred (the ``Right of First
Offer''). After receiving Ford's offer, the VEBA Trust will have ten
days to accept the offer. If the VEBA Trust does not accept Ford's
offer, it may transfer such Securities, subject to the other terms of
the Securityholder and Registration Rights Agreement, to a purchaser on
terms and conditions that are not less favorable to the VEBA Trust (and
no more favorable to the purchaser) than those outlined in Ford's
offer, provided that the transfer is completed within one hundred
twenty (120) days after notice was provided to Ford.
d. Hedging
The Applicant represents that hedging is generally permitted only
on Payment Shares received by the VEBA Trust prior to such hedging and
with respect to no more than 25% of the Payment Shares deliverable by
Ford on the next succeeding payment date, subject to satisfaction of
the Stock Settlement Conditions, in a manner consistent with the then-
existing registration rights agreement and sales and time limitations.
13. Existing Internal VEBA
The Existing Internal VEBA is the subaccount of the Ford-UAW
Benefits Trust that is maintained by Ford as a source of funding for
retiree health care expenses. As of December 31, 2008, the Existing
Internal VEBA had an estimated asset value of approximately $2.7
billion.
Until the Existing Internal VEBA is transferred to the VEBA Trust,
the assets will continue to be invested in a manner consistent with its
investment policy, as may be amended from time to time. Within 10
business days after the Implementation Date, Ford will direct the
trustee of the Existing Internal VEBA to transfer to the VEBA Trust all
assets in the Existing Internal VEBA or cash in an amount equal to the
Existing Internal VEBA balance on the date of the transfer. As
described further below, the Existing Internal VEBA will retain an
amount equal to the Existing Internal VEBA's share of expenses (to the
extent permitted by ERISA) subject to reconciliation with actual
expenses incurred.
14. Mitigation VEBA
The Mitigation VEBA was created in connection with the 2008
Settlement Agreement. Ford submitted an initial application for an
individual prohibited transaction exemption relating to the Mitigation
VEBA on November 27, 2007.\20\ The Mitigation VEBA is intended to be a
source of ``mitigation'' payments to Ford UAW retirees to lessen the
impact of the new cost-sharing provisions implemented under the 2008
Settlement Agreement. As of December 31, 2008, the Mitigation VEBA had
an estimated asset value of $54.4 million. Until the assets and
liabilities of the Mitigation VEBA are transferred to the VEBA Trust
for the benefit of the Ford VEBA Plan, its value will be affected by
certain additional contributions, investment returns and mitigation
expenses and payments. The balance of the Mitigation VEBA is to be
transferred to the VEBA Trust within 15 days after the Implementation
Date. After transfer of the assets, the Mitigation VEBA will be
terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Mitigation VEBA is the subject of Prohibited
Transaction Exemption 2009-28, 74 FR 49038 (September 25, 2009),
which provided relief for certain cash advances and ``true ups''
between Ford and the Mitigation VEBA related to administration of
such VEBA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Covered Transactions
Generally, the Applicant seeks exemptive relief for three sets of
transactions. The first set of transactions involves the acquisition,
holding, and disposition of the employer securities described above by
the Ford VEBA Plan. The second set relates to the exercise by Ford or
the Ford VEBA Plan of certain rights and obligations pursuant to the
Securityholder and Registration Rights Agreement. Finally, the third
set of transactions involves those transactions between Ford and the
Ford VEBA Plan that may occur as a result of the transition of
responsibility to provide benefits from Ford to the Ford VEBA Plan
under the 2009 Settlement Agreement, such as possible extensions of
credit, reimbursement of expenses, or the mistaken deposits of assets
into the Ford VEBA Plan.
With respect to the three sets of transactions described above, the
Applicant states that the transaction