Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Volkswagen, 63820-63821 [E9-29013]
Download as PDF
63820
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;
Volkswagen
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
SUMMARY: This document grants in full
the petition of Volkswagen Group of
America (VW) in accordance with
§ 543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR Part 543,
Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard, for the Volkswagen Tiguan
vehicle line beginning with model year
(MY) 2011. This petition is granted
because the agency has determined that
the antitheft device to be placed on the
line as standard equipment is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with model
year (MY) 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building, W43–443,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck’s
phone number is (202) 366–0846. Her
fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated August 26, 2009, VW
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541)
for the Volkswagen Tiguan vehicle line
beginning with MY 2010. The petition
requested an exemption from partsmarking pursuant to 49 CFR Part 543,
Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for an entire
vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one vehicle line per model year. In
its petition, VW provided a detailed
description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components
of the antitheft device for its new
Volkswagen Tiguan vehicle line. VW
will install its fourth generation,
transponder-based electronic engine
immobilizer antitheft device as standard
equipment on its Volkswagen Tiguan
vehicle line beginning with MY 2011.
VW stated that its fourth generation
immobilizer actively incorporates the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:26 Dec 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
engine control unit into the evaluation
and monitoring processes. Key
components of the antitheft device will
include a passive immobilizer, an
immobilizer control unit, a mechanical
ignition lock with immobilizer reading
coil, an adapted ignition key, and an
engine control unit. The antitheft device
will not include an audible or visible
alarm feature as standard equipment.
VW’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in § 543.5 and
the specific content requirements of
§ 543.6.
VW stated that once the driver/
operator turns on the ignition, the key
transponder sends a fixed code to the
immobilizer control unit. If this is
identified as the correct code, a variable
code is generated in the immobilizer
control unit and sent to the transponder.
A secret arithmetic process is then
started in the transponder and the
control unit according to a set of
specific equations. The results of the
computing process is evaluated in the
control unit and if they tally, the vehicle
key is acknowledged as correct. The
engine control unit then sends a
variable code to the immobilizer control
unit, enabling start up of the vehicle.
VW stated that a new variable code is
generated each time during this secret
computing process. Therefore, VW
believes that the code is
undecipherable.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, VW provided
information on the reliability and
durability of its proposed device. To
ensure reliability and durability of the
device, VW conducted tests based on its
own specified standards. VW provided
a detailed list of the tests conducted
(i.e., electrical system temperature
stability, mechanical integrity, electrical
performance, environmental
compatibility and service life) and
believes that the device is reliable and
durable since the device complied with
its specific requirements for each test.
Additionally, VW stated that after
recognition by the electronic module of
the key transponder, a pairing between
the key and the immobilizer occurs at
which point the key can no longer be
used for any other immobilizer.
VW stated that the Volkswagen
Tiguan was introduced in the 2009
model year as a parts-marked vehicle,
therefore no theft data is available. VW
also provided data on the theft
reduction benefits experienced by other
vehicle lines installed with immobilizer
devices that have recently been granted
petitions for exemptions by the agency.
VW has concluded that the antitheft
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
device proposed for its Volkswagen
Tiguan vehicle line is no less effective
than those devices in the lines for which
NHTSA has already granted full
exemption from the parts-marking
requirements. The agency agrees that
the device is substantially similar to
devices in these and other vehicle lines
for which the agency has already
granted exemptions.
Based on the evidence submitted by
VW, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Volkswagen
Tiguan vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the part-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of part 541 either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts marking
requirements of part 541. The agency
finds that VW has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device for the Volkswagen Tiguan
vehicle line is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541).
This conclusion is based on the
information VW provided about its
device.
The agency concludes that the device
will provide four of the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
promoting activation; preventing defeat
or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full VW’s petition for
exemption for the Volkswagen Tiguan
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR Part 541. The
agency notes that 49 CFR Part 541,
Appendix A–1, identifies those lines
that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Notices
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If VW decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked
according to the requirements under 49
CFR Parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of
major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if VW wishes in
the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d)
states that a Part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped
with the anti-theft device on which the
line’s exemption is based. Further, Part
543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting Part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if the manufacturer contemplates
making any changes, the effects of
which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: December 1, 2009.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9–29013 Filed 12–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35305]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Arkansas Electric Cooperative
Corporation—Petition for Declaratory
Order
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
ACTION: Institution of declaratory order
proceeding; request for notices of intent
to participate and comments; and
issuance of procedural schedule.
SUMMARY: In response to a petition filed
by Arkansas Electric Cooperative
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:26 Dec 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
Corporation (AECC) on October 2, 2009,
and the reply of BNSF Railway
Company (BNSF), the Board is
instituting a declaratory order
proceeding under 49 U.S.C. 721 and 5
U.S.C. 554(e).1 The issues before the
Board arise from Tariff 6041–B Items
100 and 101 (Tariff provisions), issued
by BNSF on May 27, 2009, which
require that Powder River Basin (PRB)
coal shippers using the Joint Line 2 or
the Black Hills Subdivision must ensure
that the emission of coal dust from the
cars does not exceed the coal dust
emissions standards set by BNSF. The
issues raised in these filings include: (1)
Whether the Tariff provisions constitute
an unreasonable rule or practice; (2)
whether BNSF may establish rules
designed to inhibit the dispersion of
coal dust from coal trains operating over
its lines; and (3) whether refusal to
provide service for non-compliance
with the Tariff provisions or other
actions to enforce compliance would
violate BNSF’s common carrier
obligation. Due to the vital role
transportation of coal by rail plays in
the nation’s energy supply and the
economy in general, the Board seeks
public comment and participation on
this matter.
DATES: The effective date of this
decision is December 1, 2009. Any
person who wishes to participate in this
proceeding as a party of record (POR)
must file, no later than December 11,
2009, a notice of intent to participate.
Discovery will close on February 1,
2010. Opening evidence and argument
from all PORs is due on March 16, 2010.
Reply evidence and argument from all
PORs is due on April 30, 2010. Rebuttal
evidence and argument from all PORs is
due on May 17, 2010.3
ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this
proceeding must be submitted either via
the Board’s e-filing format or in the
traditional paper format. Any person
using e-filing should attach a document
and otherwise comply with the
instructions at the E–FILING link on the
Board’s Web site, at https://
www.stb.dot.gov. Any person submitting
a filing in the traditional paper format
should send an original and 10 copies
(and also an electronic version),
referring to STB Finance Docket No.
35305, to: Surface Transportation Board,
1 By a separate decision, the Board will address
the imposition of a protective order in this
proceeding.
2 The Joint Line is the rail line serving the
southern PRB that is jointly owned by BNSF and
the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) and
operated and maintained by BNSF.
3 Although oral argument on these issues was
requested by BNSF, we are not ruling on that
request at this time.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63821
395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20423–0001. In addition, one copy of
each filing in this proceeding must be
sent (and may be sent by e-mail only if
service by e-mail is acceptable to the
recipient) to each of the following: (1)
Eric Von Salzen (representing AECC),
McLeod, Watkinson & Miller, One
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Suite 800,
Washington, DC 20001; (2) Samuel M.
Sipe, Jr. (representing BNSF), Steptoe &
Johnson LLP, 1330 Connecticut Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20036; (3) Joe
Rebein (representing UP), Shook, Hardy
& Bacon LLP, 2555 Grand Blvd., Kansas
City, Missouri 64108; (4) John H. LeSeur
(representing Western Coal Traffic
League (WCTL)), Slover & Loftus LLP,
1224 Seventeenth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20036; and (5) any
other person designated as a POR on the
service-list notice (as explained below,
the service-list notice will be issued as
soon after December 11, 2009, as
practicable).
Copies of written comments will be
available for viewing and self-copying at
the Board’s Public Docket Room, Room
131, and will be posted to the Board’s
Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 245–0395.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at: 1–
800–877–8339].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AECC is a
generation and transmission cooperative
that provides wholesale electric power
to electric cooperatives throughout
Arkansas. AECC is a co-owner, with
other utilities, of generation assets that
burn millions of tons of PRB coal
annually. During normal operating
conditions, three of these plants—White
Bluff at Redfield, AR, Independence at
Newark, AR, and Flint Creek at Gentry,
AR—receive all of their PRB coal via the
Joint Line. On May 27, 2009, BNSF
issued the Tariff provisions stating that
‘‘[e]ffective November 1, 2009, Shipper
shall take all steps necessary to ensure
that Trains handling cars loaded with
Coal from any mine origin that move
over [the Joint Line or Black Hills
Subdivision] shall not emit more than
an Integrated Dust Value (IDV.2) of [300
units or 245 units, respectively] in order
to enhance retention of coal in rail
cars.’’ AECC seeks a declaratory order
stating that the Tariff provisions
constitute an unreasonable rule or
practice and an illegal refusal to provide
service. AECC also asks that the order
state that BNSF must permit shippers to
transport coal on the Joint Line and
Black Hills Subdivision without such
restrictions.
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 232 (Friday, December 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63820-63821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29013]
[[Page 63820]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Volkswagen
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the petition of Volkswagen Group
of America (VW) in accordance with Sec. 543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR Part
543, Exemption from the Theft Prevention Standard, for the Volkswagen
Tiguan vehicle line beginning with model year (MY) 2011. This petition
is granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device
to be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
model year (MY) 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, W43-443, Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Mazyck's phone number is (202) 366-0846. Her fax number is (202)
493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated August 26, 2009, VW
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541) for the Volkswagen Tiguan vehicle
line beginning with MY 2010. The petition requested an exemption from
parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device
as standard equipment for an entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, VW
provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design,
and location of the components of the antitheft device for its new
Volkswagen Tiguan vehicle line. VW will install its fourth generation,
transponder-based electronic engine immobilizer antitheft device as
standard equipment on its Volkswagen Tiguan vehicle line beginning with
MY 2011. VW stated that its fourth generation immobilizer actively
incorporates the engine control unit into the evaluation and monitoring
processes. Key components of the antitheft device will include a
passive immobilizer, an immobilizer control unit, a mechanical ignition
lock with immobilizer reading coil, an adapted ignition key, and an
engine control unit. The antitheft device will not include an audible
or visible alarm feature as standard equipment. VW's submission is
considered a complete petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it
meets the general requirements contained in Sec. 543.5 and the
specific content requirements of Sec. 543.6.
VW stated that once the driver/operator turns on the ignition, the
key transponder sends a fixed code to the immobilizer control unit. If
this is identified as the correct code, a variable code is generated in
the immobilizer control unit and sent to the transponder. A secret
arithmetic process is then started in the transponder and the control
unit according to a set of specific equations. The results of the
computing process is evaluated in the control unit and if they tally,
the vehicle key is acknowledged as correct. The engine control unit
then sends a variable code to the immobilizer control unit, enabling
start up of the vehicle. VW stated that a new variable code is
generated each time during this secret computing process. Therefore, VW
believes that the code is undecipherable.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, VW
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, VW
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. VW provided a
detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e., electrical system
temperature stability, mechanical integrity, electrical performance,
environmental compatibility and service life) and believes that the
device is reliable and durable since the device complied with its
specific requirements for each test. Additionally, VW stated that after
recognition by the electronic module of the key transponder, a pairing
between the key and the immobilizer occurs at which point the key can
no longer be used for any other immobilizer.
VW stated that the Volkswagen Tiguan was introduced in the 2009
model year as a parts-marked vehicle, therefore no theft data is
available. VW also provided data on the theft reduction benefits
experienced by other vehicle lines installed with immobilizer devices
that have recently been granted petitions for exemptions by the agency.
VW has concluded that the antitheft device proposed for its Volkswagen
Tiguan vehicle line is no less effective than those devices in the
lines for which NHTSA has already granted full exemption from the
parts-marking requirements. The agency agrees that the device is
substantially similar to devices in these and other vehicle lines for
which the agency has already granted exemptions.
Based on the evidence submitted by VW, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Volkswagen Tiguan vehicle line is likely to be
as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the part-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts marking requirements of part 541. The agency
finds that VW has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Volkswagen Tiguan vehicle line is likely to be
as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR Part 541). This conclusion is based on the information
VW provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device will provide four of the five
types of performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation;
preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized
persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants;
and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full VW's
petition for exemption for the Volkswagen Tiguan vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR Part 541. The agency notes that 49
CFR Part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted
from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR Part
543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the disposition
of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of
future product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general description of the antitheft device
is necessary in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
[[Page 63821]]
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If VW decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR Parts 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if VW wishes in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under
this part and equipped with the anti-theft device on which the line's
exemption is based. Further, Part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: December 1, 2009.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9-29013 Filed 12-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P