National Industrial Security Program Directive No. 1, 62531-62532 [E9-28517]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 228 / Monday, November 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(2) Exhaustion of the general
insurance reserve established under part
201 of this title;
(3) Maintenance of a Title I claims/
loan ratio representing an unacceptable
risk to the Department; or
(4) Transfer of a Title I loan to a party
that does not have a valid Title I
Contract of Insurance.
8. Revise § 202.12(a)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 202.12
Title II.
(a) Tiered pricing. (1) General
requirements. (i) Prohibition against
excess variation. The customary lending
practices of a mortgagee for its single
family insured mortgages shall not
provide for a variation in mortgage
charge rates that exceeds two percentage
points. A variation is determined as
provided in paragraph (a)(6) of this
section.
(ii) Customary lending practices. The
customary lending practices of a
mortgagee include all single family
insured mortgages originated by the
mortgagee, including those funded by
the mortgagee or purchased from the
originator if requirements of the
mortgagee have the effect of leading to
violation of this section by the
originator.
(iii) Basis for permissible variations.
Any variations in the mortgage charge
rate up to two percentage points under
the mortgagee’s customary lending
practices must be based on actual
variations in fees or cost to the
mortgagee to make the mortgage loan,
which shall be determined after
accounting for the value of servicing
rights generated by making the loan and
other income to the mortgagee related to
the loan. Fees or costs must be fully
documented for each specific loan.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 12, 2009.
David H. Stevens,
Assistant Secretary for Housing–Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9–28335 Filed 11–27–09; 8:45 am]
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Information Security Oversight Office
32 CFR Part 2004
[NARA–09–0005]
RIN 3095–AB34
National Industrial Security Program
Directive No. 1
AGENCY: Information Security Oversight
Office, NARA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Information Security
Oversight Office (ISOO), National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA), is proposing to amend National
Industrial Security Program Directive
No. 1. This proposed amendment to
Directive No. 1 provides guidance to
agencies on release of certain classified
information (referred to as ‘‘proscribed
information’’) to contractors that are
owned or under the control of a foreign
interest and have had the foreign
ownership or control mitigated by an
arrangement known as a Special
Security Agreement. Currently, there is
no Federal standard across agencies on
release of proscribed information to this
group. The proposed amendment will
provide standardization and consistency
to the process across the Federal
Government, and will enable greater
efficiency in determining the release of
the information as appropriate. This
proposed amendment also moves the
definitions section to the beginning of
the part for easier use, and adds
definitions for the terms ‘‘Cognizant
Security Office,’’ ‘‘National Interest
Determination,’’ and ‘‘Proscribed
Information,’’ to accompany the new
guidelines. Finally, this proposed
amendment makes a minor
typographical change to the authority
citation to make it more accurate.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
January 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: NARA invites interested
persons to submit comments on this
proposed rule. Please include ‘‘Attn:
3095–AB34’’ and your name and
mailing address in your comments.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: Submit comments by facsimile
transmission to 301–837–0319.
• Mail: Send comments to
Regulations Comments Desk (NPOL),
Room 4100, Policy and Planning Staff,
National Archives and Records
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62531
Administration; Policy and Planning
Office; Attn: Laura McCarthy, Room
4100, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park,
MD 20740.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
comments to 8601 Adelphi Road,
College Park, MD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William J. Bosanko, Director, ISOO, at
202–357–5250.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As of
November 17, 1995, ISOO became a part
of NARA and subsequently published
Part 2004, National Industrial Program
Directive No. 1, pursuant to section
102(b)(1) of E.O. 12829, January 6, 1993
(58 FR 3479), as amended by E.O.
12885, December 14, 1993, (58 FR
65863). The Executive Order established
a National Industrial Security Program
(NISP) to safeguard Federal Government
classified information released to
contractors, licensees, and grantees
(collectively referred to here as
‘‘contractors’’) of the United States
Government. This amendment to
Directive No. 1 proposes to add
guidelines on release of proscribed
information to this category of
contractors.
ISOO maintains oversight over E.O.
12958, as amended, and policy
oversight over E.O. 12829, as amended,
and issuing this proposed amendment
fulfills one of the ISOO Director’s
delegated responsibilities under these
Executive Orders. Nothing in Directive
No. 1 or this proposed amendment shall
be construed to supersede the authority
of the Secretary of Energy or the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission under the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 2011, et seq.), or the authority
of the Director of National Intelligence
under the National Security Act of 1947,
as amended, E.O. 12333, December 8,
1981, and the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.
The interpretive guidance contained
in this proposed amendment will only
assist agencies to implement E.O. 12829,
as amended; users of Directive No. 1
shall refer concurrently to the Executive
Order for guidance.
This proposed amendment is not a
significant regulatory action for the
purposes of E.O. 12866. The proposed
amendment is also not a major rule as
defined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8,
Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking. As required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, we certify
that the proposed amendment will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because it applies only to Federal
agencies.
E:\FR\FM\30NOP1.SGM
30NOP1
62532
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 228 / Monday, November 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 2004
Classified information.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, NARA proposes to amend
Title 32 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 2004, as follows:
PART 2004—NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL
SECURITY PROGRAM DIRECTIVE NO.
1
1. Revise the authority citation for
part 2004 to read as follows:
Authority: Executive Order 12829, January
6, 1993, 58 FR 3479, as amended by
Executive Order 12885, December 14, 1993,
58 FR 65863.
2. Amend § 2004.22 by adding new
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 2004.22
[202(a)]
Operational Responsibilities
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) National Interest Determinations
(NIDs). Executive branch departments
and agencies shall make a National
Interest Determination (NID) before
authorizing contractors, cleared or in
process for clearance under a Special
Security Agreement (SSA), to have
access to proscribed information. To
make a NID, the agency shall assess
whether release of the proscribed
information is consistent with the
national security interests of the United
States.
(1) The requirement for a NID applies
to new contracts, including pre-contract
activities in which access to proscribed
information is required, and to existing
contracts when contractors are acquired
by foreign interests and an SSA is the
proposed foreign ownership, control, or
influence mitigation method.
(i) If access to proscribed information
is required to complete pre-contract
award actions or to perform on a new
contract, the Government Contracting
Activity (GCA) shall determine if release
of the information is consistent with
national security interests.
(ii) For contractors that have existing
contracts that require access to
proscribed information, have been or are
in the process of being acquired by
foreign interests, and have proposed an
SSA to mitigate foreign ownership, the
Cognizant Security Office (CSO) shall
notify the GCA of the need for a NID.
(iii) The GCA(s) shall determine,
ordinarily within 30 days, per
§ 2004.22(c)(4)(i), or 60 days, per
§ 2004.22(c)(4)(ii), whether release of
the proscribed information is consistent
with national security interests.
(2) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2536,
DoD and the Department of Energy
(DOE) cannot award a contract
involving access to proscribed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Nov 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
information to a contractor effectively
owned or controlled by a foreign
government unless a waiver has been
issued by the Secretary of Defense or
Secretary of Energy.
(3) NIDs may be program-, project-, or
contract-specific. For program and
project NIDs, a separate NID is not
required for each contract. The CSO
may require the GCA to identify all
contracts covered by the NID. NID
decisions shall be made by officials as
specified by CSA policy or as
designated by the agency head.
(4) NID decisions shall ordinarily be
made within 30 days.
(i) Where no interagency coordination
is required because the department or
agency owns or controls all of the
proscribed information in question, the
GCA shall provide a final documented
decision to the applicable CSO, with a
copy to the contractor, ordinarily within
30 days of the date of the request for the
NID.
(ii) If the proscribed information is
owned by, or under the control of, a
department or agency other than the
GCA (e.g., National Security Agency
(NSA) for Communications Security, the
Office of the Director of National
Intelligence (ODNI) for Sensitive
Compartmented Information, and DOE
for Restricted Data), the GCA shall
provide written notice to that
department or agency that its written
concurrence is required. Such notice
shall be provided within 30 days of
being informed by the CSO of the
requirement for a NID. The GCA shall
ordinarily provide a final documented
decision to the applicable CSO, with a
copy to the contractor, within 60 days
of the date of the request for the NID.
(iii) If the NID decision is not
provided within 30 days, per
§ 2004.22(c)(4)(i), or 60 days, per
§ 2004.22(c)(4)(ii), the CSA shall
intercede to request the GCA to provide
a decision. In such instances, the CSO
will provide the contractor with updates
at 30-day intervals until the NID
decision is made.
(5) The CSO shall not delay
implementation of an SSA pending
completion of a GCA’s NID processing,
provided there is no indication that a
NID will be denied either by the GCA
or the owner of the information (i.e.,
NSA, DOE, or ODNI). However, the
contractor shall not have access to
additional proscribed information under
a new contract until the GCA
determines that the release of the
information is consistent with national
security interests and issues a NID.
(6) The CSO shall not upgrade an
existing contractor clearance under an
SSA to Top Secret unless an approved
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NID covering the prospective Top Secret
access has been issued.
§ 2004.24
[Redesignated as § 2004.5]
3. Redesignate § 2004.24 as § 2004.5,
and transfer newly designated § 2004.5
from subpart B to subpart A.
4. In newly designated § 2004.5,
redesignate paragraph (b) as paragraph
(c), and add new paragraphs (b), (d), and
(e), to read as follows:
§ 2004.5
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) ‘‘Cognizant Security Office (CSO)’’
means the organizational entity
delegated by the Head of a CSA to
administer industrial security on behalf
of the CSA.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) ‘‘National Interest Determination
(NID)’’ means a determination that
access to proscribed information is
consistent with the national security
interests of the United States.
(e) ‘‘Proscribed information’’ means
Top Secret; Communications Security,
except classified keys used for data
transfer; Restricted Data; Special Access
Program; or Sensitive Compartmented
Information.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
William J. Bosanko,
Director, Information Security Oversight
Office.
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. E9–28517 Filed 11–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2005–AL–0002; FRL–9086–
3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans: Alabama:
Proposed Approval of Revisions to the
Visible Emissions Rule and Alternative
Proposed Disapproval of Revisions to
the Visible Emissions Rule;
Informational Notice
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of document availability.
SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is
to inform the public that EPA has added
a memorandum to the docket to explain
the source of information for two
exhibits that were provided in the
original docket for the rulemaking
entitled ‘‘Proposed Approval of
Revisions to the Visible Emissions Rule
E:\FR\FM\30NOP1.SGM
30NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 228 (Monday, November 30, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62531-62532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28517]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Information Security Oversight Office
32 CFR Part 2004
[NARA-09-0005]
RIN 3095-AB34
National Industrial Security Program Directive No. 1
AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office, NARA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is proposing to amend
National Industrial Security Program Directive No. 1. This proposed
amendment to Directive No. 1 provides guidance to agencies on release
of certain classified information (referred to as ``proscribed
information'') to contractors that are owned or under the control of a
foreign interest and have had the foreign ownership or control
mitigated by an arrangement known as a Special Security Agreement.
Currently, there is no Federal standard across agencies on release of
proscribed information to this group. The proposed amendment will
provide standardization and consistency to the process across the
Federal Government, and will enable greater efficiency in determining
the release of the information as appropriate. This proposed amendment
also moves the definitions section to the beginning of the part for
easier use, and adds definitions for the terms ``Cognizant Security
Office,'' ``National Interest Determination,'' and ``Proscribed
Information,'' to accompany the new guidelines. Finally, this proposed
amendment makes a minor typographical change to the authority citation
to make it more accurate.
DATES: Submit comments on or before January 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: NARA invites interested persons to submit comments on this
proposed rule. Please include ``Attn: 3095-AB34'' and your name and
mailing address in your comments. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: Submit comments by facsimile transmission to 301-837-
0319.
Mail: Send comments to Regulations Comments Desk (NPOL),
Room 4100, Policy and Planning Staff, National Archives and Records
Administration; Policy and Planning Office; Attn: Laura McCarthy, Room
4100, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver comments to 8601 Adelphi
Road, College Park, MD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William J. Bosanko, Director, ISOO, at
202-357-5250.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As of November 17, 1995, ISOO became a part
of NARA and subsequently published Part 2004, National Industrial
Program Directive No. 1, pursuant to section 102(b)(1) of E.O. 12829,
January 6, 1993 (58 FR 3479), as amended by E.O. 12885, December 14,
1993, (58 FR 65863). The Executive Order established a National
Industrial Security Program (NISP) to safeguard Federal Government
classified information released to contractors, licensees, and grantees
(collectively referred to here as ``contractors'') of the United States
Government. This amendment to Directive No. 1 proposes to add
guidelines on release of proscribed information to this category of
contractors.
ISOO maintains oversight over E.O. 12958, as amended, and policy
oversight over E.O. 12829, as amended, and issuing this proposed
amendment fulfills one of the ISOO Director's delegated
responsibilities under these Executive Orders. Nothing in Directive No.
1 or this proposed amendment shall be construed to supersede the
authority of the Secretary of Energy or the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2011, et seq.), or the authority of the Director of National
Intelligence under the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, E.O.
12333, December 8, 1981, and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004.
The interpretive guidance contained in this proposed amendment will
only assist agencies to implement E.O. 12829, as amended; users of
Directive No. 1 shall refer concurrently to the Executive Order for
guidance.
This proposed amendment is not a significant regulatory action for
the purposes of E.O. 12866. The proposed amendment is also not a major
rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8, Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we certify
that the proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it applies only to Federal
agencies.
[[Page 62532]]
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 2004
Classified information.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, NARA proposes to amend
Title 32 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2004, as follows:
PART 2004--NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY PROGRAM DIRECTIVE NO. 1
1. Revise the authority citation for part 2004 to read as follows:
Authority: Executive Order 12829, January 6, 1993, 58 FR 3479,
as amended by Executive Order 12885, December 14, 1993, 58 FR 65863.
2. Amend Sec. 2004.22 by adding new paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2004.22 Operational Responsibilities [202(a)]
* * * * *
(c) National Interest Determinations (NIDs). Executive branch
departments and agencies shall make a National Interest Determination
(NID) before authorizing contractors, cleared or in process for
clearance under a Special Security Agreement (SSA), to have access to
proscribed information. To make a NID, the agency shall assess whether
release of the proscribed information is consistent with the national
security interests of the United States.
(1) The requirement for a NID applies to new contracts, including
pre-contract activities in which access to proscribed information is
required, and to existing contracts when contractors are acquired by
foreign interests and an SSA is the proposed foreign ownership,
control, or influence mitigation method.
(i) If access to proscribed information is required to complete
pre-contract award actions or to perform on a new contract, the
Government Contracting Activity (GCA) shall determine if release of the
information is consistent with national security interests.
(ii) For contractors that have existing contracts that require
access to proscribed information, have been or are in the process of
being acquired by foreign interests, and have proposed an SSA to
mitigate foreign ownership, the Cognizant Security Office (CSO) shall
notify the GCA of the need for a NID.
(iii) The GCA(s) shall determine, ordinarily within 30 days, per
Sec. 2004.22(c)(4)(i), or 60 days, per Sec. 2004.22(c)(4)(ii),
whether release of the proscribed information is consistent with
national security interests.
(2) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2536, DoD and the Department of
Energy (DOE) cannot award a contract involving access to proscribed
information to a contractor effectively owned or controlled by a
foreign government unless a waiver has been issued by the Secretary of
Defense or Secretary of Energy.
(3) NIDs may be program-, project-, or contract-specific. For
program and project NIDs, a separate NID is not required for each
contract. The CSO may require the GCA to identify all contracts covered
by the NID. NID decisions shall be made by officials as specified by
CSA policy or as designated by the agency head.
(4) NID decisions shall ordinarily be made within 30 days.
(i) Where no interagency coordination is required because the
department or agency owns or controls all of the proscribed information
in question, the GCA shall provide a final documented decision to the
applicable CSO, with a copy to the contractor, ordinarily within 30
days of the date of the request for the NID.
(ii) If the proscribed information is owned by, or under the
control of, a department or agency other than the GCA (e.g., National
Security Agency (NSA) for Communications Security, the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) for Sensitive Compartmented
Information, and DOE for Restricted Data), the GCA shall provide
written notice to that department or agency that its written
concurrence is required. Such notice shall be provided within 30 days
of being informed by the CSO of the requirement for a NID. The GCA
shall ordinarily provide a final documented decision to the applicable
CSO, with a copy to the contractor, within 60 days of the date of the
request for the NID.
(iii) If the NID decision is not provided within 30 days, per Sec.
2004.22(c)(4)(i), or 60 days, per Sec. 2004.22(c)(4)(ii), the CSA
shall intercede to request the GCA to provide a decision. In such
instances, the CSO will provide the contractor with updates at 30-day
intervals until the NID decision is made.
(5) The CSO shall not delay implementation of an SSA pending
completion of a GCA's NID processing, provided there is no indication
that a NID will be denied either by the GCA or the owner of the
information (i.e., NSA, DOE, or ODNI). However, the contractor shall
not have access to additional proscribed information under a new
contract until the GCA determines that the release of the information
is consistent with national security interests and issues a NID.
(6) The CSO shall not upgrade an existing contractor clearance
under an SSA to Top Secret unless an approved NID covering the
prospective Top Secret access has been issued.
Sec. 2004.24 [Redesignated as Sec. 2004.5]
3. Redesignate Sec. 2004.24 as Sec. 2004.5, and transfer newly
designated Sec. 2004.5 from subpart B to subpart A.
4. In newly designated Sec. 2004.5, redesignate paragraph (b) as
paragraph (c), and add new paragraphs (b), (d), and (e), to read as
follows:
Sec. 2004.5 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) ``Cognizant Security Office (CSO)'' means the organizational
entity delegated by the Head of a CSA to administer industrial security
on behalf of the CSA.
* * * * *
(d) ``National Interest Determination (NID)'' means a determination
that access to proscribed information is consistent with the national
security interests of the United States.
(e) ``Proscribed information'' means Top Secret; Communications
Security, except classified keys used for data transfer; Restricted
Data; Special Access Program; or Sensitive Compartmented Information.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
William J. Bosanko,
Director, Information Security Oversight Office.
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. E9-28517 Filed 11-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P