Certain Ceramic Capacitors and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 57193-57194 [E9-26548]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Notices
December 24, 1996, Amendment; ‘265
patent (JX–2) at column 14, lines 19–34;
FIG. 7. Please cite record evidence and
relevant legal authority to support your
position.
3. Does Dr. Qu state anywhere in the
record that he relied on his direct
loading testing methodology to
independently prove infringement of
the asserted claims of the ‘977 and ‘627
patents by the accused packages? Please
cite only record evidence.
4. Was Dr. Qu’s demonstrated stress
relief in the solder balls of the accused
packages due to terminal-to-chip
displacement caused by the applied
external load? Please cite only record
evidence.
In connection with the final
disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that
could result in the exclusion of the
subject articles from entry into the
United States, and/or (2) issue one or
more cease and desist orders that could
result in the respondent(s) being
required to cease and desist from
engaging in unfair acts in the
importation and sale of such articles.
Accordingly, the Commission is
interested in receiving written
submissions that address the form of
remedy, if any, that should be ordered.
If a party seeks exclusion of an article
from entry into the United States for
purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain
Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360,
USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some
form of remedy, it must consider the
effects of that remedy upon the public
interest. The factors the Commission
will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist
orders would have on (1) the public
health and welfare, (2) competitive
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
production of articles that are like or
directly competitive with those that are
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the
aforementioned public interest factors
in the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form
of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the
President, has 60 days to approve or
disapprove the Commission’s action.
See Presidential Memorandum of July
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:29 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).
During this period, the subject articles
would be entitled to enter the United
States under bond, in an amount
determined by the Commission. The
Commission is therefore interested in
receiving submissions concerning the
amount of the bond that should be
imposed if a remedy is ordered.
Written Submissions: The parties to
the investigation are requested to file
written submissions on the issues
identified in this notice. Parties to the
investigation, interested government
agencies, and any other interested
parties are encouraged to file written
submissions on the issues of remedy,
the public interest, and bonding. Such
submissions should address the
recommended determination by the ALJ
on remedy and bonding. Complainants
and the IA are also requested to submit
proposed remedial orders for the
Commission’s consideration.
Complainants are also requested to state
the dates that the patents expire and the
HTSUS numbers under which the
accused products are imported. The
written submissions and proposed
remedial orders must be filed no later
than close of business on Friday,
November 13, 2009. Reply submissions
must be filed no later than the close of
business on Friday, November 20, 2009.
No further submissions on these issues
will be permitted unless otherwise
ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof on or before the
deadlines stated above with the Office
of the Secretary. Any person desiring to
submit a document to the Commission
in confidence must request confidential
treatment unless the information has
already been granted such treatment
during the proceedings. All such
requests should be directed to the
Secretary of the Commission and must
include a full statement of the reasons
why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR § 210.6.
Documents for which confidential
treatment by the Commission is sought
will be treated accordingly. All
nonconfidential written submissions
will be available for public inspection at
the Office of the Secretary.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–210.46 and 210.50 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR *§ 210.42–210.46
and 210.50).
By order of the Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57193
Issued: October 30, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–26546 Filed 11–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–692]
Certain Ceramic Capacitors and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
October 1, 2009, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Murata
Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of Japan and
Murata Electronics North America, Inc.
A supplement to the complaint was
filed on October 28, 2009. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain ceramic
capacitors and products containing
same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
6,266,229; 6,014,309; 6,377,439; and
6,243,254. The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
57194
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 4, 2009 / Notices
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aarti Shah, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–2657.
Authority: The authority for institution
of this investigation is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
October 28, 2009, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain ceramic
capacitors or products containing same
that infringe one or more of claims
1–4, 7–9, 11–14, 17–24, 28–31, 34–47,
51–53, 55, and 56 of U.S. Patent No.
6,266,229; claim 3 of U.S. Patent No.
6,014,309; claims 1–3, and 5 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,377,439; and claims 1, 2,
9–14, 19, and 20 of U.S. Patent No.
6,243,254, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are—
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., 10–1
Higashikotari 1-chome, Nagaokakyoshi, Kyoto, Japan 617–8555.
Murata Electronics North America, Inc.,
2200 Lake Park Drive, Smyrna,
Georgia 30080.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.,
314 Maetan-3-dong, Yeongtong-gu,
Suwon City 443–743, Korea.
Samsung Electro-Mechanics America,
Inc., 3345 Michelson Drive, Suite 350,
Irvine, CA 92612.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Aarti Shah, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:29 Nov 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 29, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–26548 Filed 11–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
assist in professional contacts to benefit
the Department’s business practices.
This system covers employee directory
information located on the Department’s
internal e-mail system as well as
directories maintained by components.
This system notice also replaces, and
the Department hereby removes, the
following system notice, previously
published by the Environment and
Natural Resources Division: ‘‘Personnel
Locator System, Environment and
Natural Resources Division (ENRD–
002),’’ 73 FR 39,722 (July 10, 2008).
DATES: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552a(e)(4) and (11), the public is given
a 30-day period in which to comment,
and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), which has oversight
responsibility under the Act, requires a
40-day period in which to conclude its
review of the system. Therefore, please
submit any comments by December 14,
2009.
ADDRESSES: The public, OMB, and
Congress are invited to submit any
comments to the Department of Justice,
Attn: Robin N. Moss, Privacy Analyst,
Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties,
Department of Justice, National Place
Building, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Suite 940, Washington, DC 20530.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robin N. Moss, Privacy Analyst, Office
of Privacy and Civil Liberties,
Department of Justice, National Place
Building, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Suite 940, Washington, DC 20530.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r),
the Department has provided a report to
OMB and Congress on the new system
of records.
Dated: October 29, 2009.
Nancy C. Libin,
Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer,
Department of Justice.
[CPCLO Order No. 004–2009]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
JUSTICE/DOJ–014
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
SYSTEM NAME:
AGENCY:
United States Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Notice of a new system of
records and notice to remove a system
of records.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of
1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the United States
Department of Justice (‘‘Department’’),
proposes to establish a new system of
records to maintain employee directory
information entitled, ‘‘Employee
Directory Systems for the Department of
Justice,’’ JUSTICE/DOJ–014. The
Department maintains employee
directory information in order to
facilitate employee collaboration and
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Employee Directory Systems for the
Department of Justice
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
Sensitive But Unclassified
Information and/or Controlled
Unclassified Information
SYSTEM LOCATION:
United States Department of Justice,
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20530–0001, and other
Department of Justice offices throughout
the United States and abroad.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
Employees, former employees,
detailees, student aides, law clerks,
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57193-57194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26548]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-692]
Certain Ceramic Capacitors and Products Containing Same; Notice
of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on October 1, 2009, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of Japan and Murata Electronics North
America, Inc. A supplement to the complaint was filed on October 28,
2009. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain ceramic
capacitors and products containing same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,266,229; 6,014,309; 6,377,439; and
6,243,254. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://
[[Page 57194]]
www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aarti Shah, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202) 205-2657. Authority: The authority for institution of this
investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on October 28, 2009, Ordered That--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain ceramic
capacitors or products containing same that infringe one or more of
claims 1-4, 7-9, 11-14, 17-24, 28-31, 34-47, 51-53, 55, and 56 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,266,229; claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,014,309; claims 1-3,
and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,377,439; and claims 1, 2, 9-14, 19, and 20
of U.S. Patent No. 6,243,254, and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are--
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., 10-1 Higashikotari 1-chome, Nagaokakyo-
shi, Kyoto, Japan 617-8555.
Murata Electronics North America, Inc., 2200 Lake Park Drive, Smyrna,
Georgia 30080.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd., 314 Maetan-3-dong, Yeongtong-gu,
Suwon City 443-743, Korea.
Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc., 3345 Michelson Drive, Suite
350, Irvine, CA 92612.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Aarti Shah, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 29, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-26548 Filed 11-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P