Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People's Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 55541-55542 [E9-25952]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Notices
• Relevant information that would
help determine how the proposed
candidate meets the criteria.
The SGIP Administrator will verify
that the information is complete and
contact candidates to confirm that their
submission has been received. For
submissions received on or before
November 6, 2009, a slate of candidates
by stakeholder category and at-large
positions, who have been determined to
meet the criteria, will be posted by
November 13, 2009. For all submissions,
the proposed candidates will be notified
whether they meet the criteria within a
reasonable time.
Qualified candidates are sought with
experience in one or more of the
following Stakeholder Category areas:
1. Appliance and consumer
electronics providers.
2. Consumers—Commercial and
Industrial (C&I).
3. Consumers—Residential.
4. Electricity and financial market
traders (includes aggregators).
5. Electric utility companies—Investor
Owned Utilities (IOU).
6. Electric utility companies—
Municipal (MUNI).
7. Electric utility companies—Rural
Electric Association (REA).
8. Electric transportation industry
stakeholders.
9. Information and communication
technologies (ICT) infrastructure and
service providers.
10. Independent power producers.
11. Information technology (IT)
application developers and integrators.
12. Power equipment manufacturers
and vendors.
13. Professional societies, users
groups, and industry consortia.
14. R&D organizations and academia.
15. Relevant federal government
agencies.
16. Renewable power producers.
17. Retail service providers.
18. Standard and specification
development organizations (SDOs).
19. State and local regulators.
20. Testing and certification vendors.
21. Transmission operators.
22. Venture capital.
Qualified candidates are also sought
for three at-large positions.
Criteria to be considered in selecting
nominees for the SGIPGB include:
• Visionary Capability: Candidates
will be capable of understanding and
contributing to the multi-disciplinary
aspects of the Smart Grid and the
specific goals of the SGIP mission.
• Team Effectiveness: Candidates will
be able to work effectively within the
scope of the Governing Board and
within its organizational environment as
a team.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:34 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
• Credibility and Outreach:
Candidates will be able to relay and
leverage SGIPGB messages through the
stakeholder community, contributing to
underlying consensus building goals of
the SGIPGB.
• Recognition: Candidates will be
recognized experts in their technical
fields of endeavor.
• Commitment: Candidates will be
committed to contribute time and effort
to SGIPGB activities.
EnerNex Corp. currently serves as the
SGIP Administrator. A Candidate
Evaluation Team established by the
SGIP Administrator will consider
proposed candidates against the criteria
listed above to determine their
eligibility. The SGIP Administrator will
present a slate of eligible candidates for
voting within the Stakeholder
Categories and for the at-large positions.
Organizations that have registered as
SGIP members will then vote to select
SGIPGB members between 5 p.m.
Eastern, Monday, November 16, and 8
p.m. Eastern, Wednesday, November 18.
To become a member of the SGIP an
organization must register using the
instructions at this Web site: https://
collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/
view/SmartGrid/SGIP.
Active participation in the SGIPGB
offers a unique opportunity to accelerate
and shape the standards-based
information, telecommunications and
control architecture for the future
electric system from generation to enduse. Governing Board members are
expected to invest significant effort in
guiding the activities of the SGIP,
advancing Priority Action Plans (PAPs)
and lists of standards, guiding the
development of a conformity assessment
framework, and guiding the
development of an architectural
direction and reference framework
through maintenance and evolution of
the NIST conceptual architectural
model. This means that investigation
and presentation of concepts and results
are natural components of this work. A
serious commitment to attend meetings
and review relevant material is required.
Members will be expected to contribute
between 5 percent and 15 percent of
their time to SGIPGB activities
(including attendance at a minimum of
two face-to-face meetings per year, with
a similar minimum number of Web
conferences).
Background materials on the SGIPGB
and related interoperability activities
include:
• SGIPB Charter and Bylaws: https://
collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/
SmartGrid/SGIP/SGIP_and_GB_
Charter.doc.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55541
• NIST Framework and Roadmap for
Smart Grid Interoperability Standards,
Release 1.0 (Draft): https://www.nist.gov/
public_affairs/releases/
smartgrid_interoperability.pdf.
• GWAC Interoperability ContextSetting Framework (v 1.1) Document:
https://www.gridwiseac.org/pdfs/interop
framework_v1_1.pdf.
• GWAC Interoperability Path
Forward White Paper: https://
www.gridwiseac.org/pdfs/
interoperability_path_
whitepaper_v1_0.pdf.
• GWAC Interoperability Constitution
White Paper: https://www.gridwiseac.
org/pdfs/constitution_whitepaper_v1_1.
pdf.
All of the documents listed above are
available through the NIST Smart Grid
Web site at: https://www.nist.gov/
smartgrid/ or the NIST Smart Grid
Twiki Collaboration Site at: https://
collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/
view/SmartGrid/WebHome.
Dated: October 22, 2009.
Patrick Gallagher,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. E9–25970 Filed 10–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–911]
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Pipe from the People’s Republic of
China: Rescission of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 28, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kolberg at (202) 482–1785; AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2009, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published a notice announcing the
opportunity to request an administrative
review of the countervailing duty order
on circular welded carbon quality steel
pipe (‘‘circular pipe’’) from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 74 FR 31406
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
55542
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 28, 2009 / Notices
(July 1, 2009). On July 31, 2009, the Ad
Hoc Coalition for Fair Pipe Imports and
its individual members, Allied Tube &
Conduit, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc.,
Northwest Pipe Company, Sharon Tube
Company, Western Tube & Conduit
Corporation, and Wheatland Tube
Company (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’)
timely requested an administrative
review of ten exporters and producers
covering the period November 13, 2007,
through December 31, 2008. In
accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department
published a notice initiating an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on circular
pipe from the PRC. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 74 FR 42873 (August
25, 2009).
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(l), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if the party
that requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. On September 30,
2009, Petitioners withdrew their request
for review of all ten exporters and
producers within the 90-day period, and
no other party requested a review.
Therefore, in response to Petitioners’
withdrawal, and as no one else
requested a review, the Department is
rescinding this administrative review.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess countervailing duties at the
cash deposit rate in effect on the date of
entry, for entries during the period
November 13, 2007, through March 12,
2008 and from July 21, 2008, through
December 31, 2008. Pursuant to section
703(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), suspension of
liquidation was discontinued on March
12, 2008, and no countervailing duties
will be assessed on entries between
March 12, 2008, and July 21, 2008. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of this
notice of rescission of administrative
review.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as a final reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protection orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:34 Oct 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice of rescission is issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: October 21, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–25952 Filed 10–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Federal Student Financial Assistance
Programs Under Title IV of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as Amended
Department of Education.
Notice inviting suggestions for
new experiments for the Experimental
Sites Initiative.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Secretary of Education
invites institutions of higher education
that participate in the student assistance
programs authorized under title IV of
the Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended (the HEA), or consortiums of
such institutions, to propose ideas for
institutionally based experiments
designed to test new ways of
administering the student financial
assistance programs authorized by title
IV of the HEA (the Title IV, HEA
programs). This effort is called the
Experimental Sites Initiative (ESI). This
notice is the first of two notices that the
Secretary will publish regarding the ESI.
Under section 487A(b) of the HEA,
the Secretary has the authority to grant
waivers from specific Title IV, HEA
statutory or regulatory requirements to
allow institutions to test alternative
methods for administering the Title IV,
HEA programs. Such institutions are
referred to in the HEA as ‘‘experimental
sites’’. The Secretary seeks suggestions
on how best to use this authority to
reduce burden in the administration of
the Title IV, HEA programs.
Consistent with section 487A(b) of the
HEA, the Secretary cannot waive
requirements related to need analysis,
award rules, and grant and loan
maximum award amounts. However, the
Secretary anticipates approving
experiments in a wide variety of other
areas. The Secretary is particularly
interested in suggestions for
experiments that might produce
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
stronger academic outcomes for
students, such as improved persistence,
shorter time to degree, and reduced
reliance on outside work.
After reviewing the suggestions
submitted by institutions as a result of
this notice and constructing an
evaluation design for approved
experiments, the Secretary will publish
a second notice in the Federal Register
announcing approved experiments as
well as the implementation and
evaluative criteria for each approved
experiment. The subsequent notice will
invite institutions to apply to participate
in one or more of those experiments,
with preference given to the
institution(s) that submitted the original
suggestion.
DATES: Suggestions must be submitted
no later than December 18, 2009 in
order to ensure consideration for
inclusion in the first phase of ESI.
ADDRESSES: Submissions must be
submitted as an attachment to an e-mail
sent to the following e-mail address:
experimentalsites@ed.gov.
Instructions for Submitting
Suggestions: We recommend that
suggestions be prepared in either a
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat
document that is attached to an
electronic mail message sent to the email address provided in the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. We ask that
submitters include the name and
address of the institution that is
submitting the suggestion and the name,
title, mailing and e-mail addresses, and
telephone number of a contact person
for the institution or consortium. If the
submission is from a consortium of
institutions, we ask that the submitter
list all institutions but only one contact
person.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Warren Farr, U.S. Department of
Education, Federal Student Aid, Room
43H2, 830 First Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20002. E-mail at:
Warren.Farr@ed.gov or by telephone at
(202) 377–4380.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339. Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g. Braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
by contacting Warren Farr.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Through ESI, we seek to experiment
with ways to both improve services to
students and free institutions and
students from administrative burdens,
while maintaining (or increasing) the
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55541-55542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25952]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-911]
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People's
Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 28, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg at (202) 482-1785; AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'')
published a notice announcing the opportunity to request an
administrative review of the countervailing duty order on circular
welded carbon quality steel pipe (``circular pipe'') from the People's
Republic of China (``PRC''). See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 74 FR 31406
[[Page 55542]]
(July 1, 2009). On July 31, 2009, the Ad Hoc Coalition for Fair Pipe
Imports and its individual members, Allied Tube & Conduit, IPSCO
Tubulars, Inc., Northwest Pipe Company, Sharon Tube Company, Western
Tube & Conduit Corporation, and Wheatland Tube Company (collectively,
``Petitioners'') timely requested an administrative review of ten
exporters and producers covering the period November 13, 2007, through
December 31, 2008. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), the
Department published a notice initiating an administrative review of
the countervailing duty order on circular pipe from the PRC. See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 42873 (August 25,
2009).
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(l), the Secretary will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. On
September 30, 2009, Petitioners withdrew their request for review of
all ten exporters and producers within the 90-day period, and no other
party requested a review. Therefore, in response to Petitioners'
withdrawal, and as no one else requested a review, the Department is
rescinding this administrative review.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') to assess countervailing duties at the cash deposit rate in
effect on the date of entry, for entries during the period November 13,
2007, through March 12, 2008 and from July 21, 2008, through December
31, 2008. Pursuant to section 703(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (``the Act''), suspension of liquidation was discontinued on
March 12, 2008, and no countervailing duties will be assessed on
entries between March 12, 2008, and July 21, 2008. The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of this notice of rescission of
administrative review.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
administrative protection orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice of rescission is issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: October 21, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-25952 Filed 10-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S