Barium Chloride From China, 54069-54070 [E9-25246]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Notices jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on sorbitol from France would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 5, 2009, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (74 FR 31762, July 2, 2009) was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission also found that other circumstances warranted conducting a full review.1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 1 Commissioners Irving A. Williamson and Dean A. Pinkert found that no other circumstances warranted conducting a full review and voted for an expedited review. VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:33 Oct 20, 2009 Jkt 220001 By order of the Commission. Issued: October 14, 2009. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–25249 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1043–1045 (Review)] Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From China, Malaysia, and Thailand AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct full five-year reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China, Malaysia, and Thailand. SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China, Malaysia, and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54069 On October 5, 2009, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (74 FR 31750, July 2, 2009) was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response with respect to Malaysia was adequate and decided to conduct a full review with respect to the antidumping duty order concerning polyethylene retail carrier bags from Malaysia. The Commission found that the respondent interested party group responses with respect to China and Thailand were inadequate. However, the Commission determined to conduct full reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China and Thailand to promote administrative efficiency in light of its decision to conduct a full review with respect to the antidumping duty order concerning polyethylene retail carrier bags from Malaysia. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: October 14, 2009. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–25248 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–149 (Third Review)] Barium Chloride From China AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from China. SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM 21OCN1 54070 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Notices order on barium chloride from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. On October 5, 2009, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (74 FR 31757, July 2, 2009) was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission also found that other circumstances warranted conducting a full review.1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. 1 Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane, Irving A. Williamson, and Dean A. Pinkert found that no other circumstances warranted conducting a full review and voted for an expedited review. VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:33 Oct 20, 2009 Jkt 220001 Issued: October 14, 2009. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–25246 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–394–A & 399– A (Second Review) (Remand)] Ball Bearings From Japan and the United Kingdom AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings. SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby gives notice of its second remand proceedings with respect to its affirmative determinations in the fiveyear reviews of the antidumping orders on ball bearings from Japan and the United Kingdom. For further information concerning the conduct of this proceeding and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: October 14, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James McClure, Office of Investigations, telephone 202–205–3191, or David Goldfine, Office of General Counsel, telephone 202–708–5452, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—In June 2006, the Commission unanimously determined that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonable foreseeable time. The Commission’s determinations for Japan and the United Kingdom were appealed to the Court of International Trade (the ‘‘Court’’). On September 9, PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2008, the Court issued a decision remanding the matter to the Commission for further proceedings. NSK v. United States, Slip Op. 08–95 (Ct. Int’l Trade, Sept. 9, 2008) (NSK I). In its opinion, the Court issued an order instructing the Commission to (1) ‘‘[C]onduct a Bratsk analysis of nonsubject imports as outlined in this opinion;’’(2) ‘‘reassess supply conditions within the domestic industry,’’ i.e., the industry’s restructuring efforts during the period of review, and (3) ‘‘reexamine its findings with regard to likely impact and its decision to cumulate imports from the United Kingdom in light of changes in its determinations that may result as a consequence of the foregoing remand instructions.’’ On October 8, 2008, in accordance with the Court’s order, the Commission initiated remand proceedings in the above-captioned reviews. The notice of initiation for the remand proceeding was published in the Federal Register at 73 FR 63217 (Oct. 20, 2008). The Commission re-opened its record to obtain information to conduct a Bratsk analysis of non-subject imports as outlined in the Court’s opinion. The Commission also permitted parties to file comments pertaining to the specific issues that are the subject of the Court’s remand instructions and to comment on the new information obtained on remand. Id. On October 9, 2008, the Commission filed a motion for reconsideration with the Court. In the motion, the Commission requested that the Court reconsider its decision in light of the Federal Circuit’s decision, Mittal Steel Point Lisas Limited v. United States, Court No. 2007–1552 (September 18, 2008) (Mittal). In its motion, the Commission also requested that the CIT issue a stay of the remand proceeding pending the Court’s disposition of the Commission’s motion for reconsideration. Defendant-Intervenor The Timken Company (‘‘Timken’’) filed a similar motion for reconsideration and a motion to stay the remand proceeding. On October 29, 2008, the CIT granted the requests of the Commission and Timken to stay the Commission’s remand proceeding pending its reconsideration of the Commission’s and Timken’s motions for reconsideration. Accordingly, the Commission stayed its remand proceeding on November 17, 2008 pending the Court’s ruling on the motions for reconsideration. On December 29, 2008, the Court denied the motions for reconsideration by the Commission and Timken. NSK Corp. et al. v. United States, Slip Op. 08–145 E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM 21OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54069-54070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-149 (Third Review)]


Barium Chloride From China

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year 
review concerning the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from 
China.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a 
full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping 
duty

[[Page 54070]]

order on barium chloride from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably 
foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and 
announced at a later date. For further information concerning the 
conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A 
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 
CFR part 207).

DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 5, 2009, the Commission 
determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-
year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission 
found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice 
of institution (74 FR 31757, July 2, 2009) was adequate and that the 
respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The 
Commission also found that other circumstances warranted conducting a 
full review.\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's 
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements 
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane, Irving A. Williamson, and 
Dean A. Pinkert found that no other circumstances warranted 
conducting a full review and voted for an expedited review.

    Authority:  This review is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 14, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-25246 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P