Delphi Steering Including On-Site Leased Workers From Bartech and Securitas, Acro Service Corporation, Et al.; Saginaw, MI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 53760-53761 [E9-25149]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
53760
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Notices
Overview of Information Collection
1117–0038
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[OMB Number 1117–0038]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: Reporting and
Recordkeeping for Digital Certificates
60-Day Notice of Information
Collection under review.
cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA), will
be submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted
until December 21, 2009. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments, especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Mark W. Caverly, Chief,
Liaison and Policy Section, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, VA 22152.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:46 Oct 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Reporting and recordkeeping for digital
certificates.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection:
Form Number:
DEA Form 251: CSOS DEA Registrant
Certificate Application.
DEA Form 252: CSOS Principal
Coordinator/Alternate Coordinator
Certificate Application.
DEA Form 253: CSOS Power of Attorney
Certificate Application.
DEA Form 254: CSOS Certificate
Application Registrant List
Addendum. CSOS Certificate
Revocation.
Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration,
Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Business or other for-profit.
Other: Non-profit, State and local
government.
Abstract: Persons use these forms to
apply for DEA-issued digital certificates
to order Schedule I and II controlled
substances. Certificates must be
renewed upon renewal of the DEA
registration to which the certificate is
linked. Certificates may be revoked and/
or replaced when information on which
the certificate is based changes.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond:
Total number of respondents: 38,000
per year and 113,000 for the three-year
period.
Average time to respond: 0.58 hours.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: It is estimated that there are
21,129 annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: October 14, 2009.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United
States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E9–25128 Filed 10–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
Record of Vote of Meeting Closure;
(Pub. L. 94–409) (5 U.S.C. 552b)
I, Isaac Fulwood, of the United States
Parole Commission, was present at a
meeting of said Commission, which
started at approximately 12 p.m., on
Tuesday, October 6, 2009, at the U.S.
Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship
Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase,
Maryland 20815. The purpose of the
meeting was to decide one petition for
reconsideration pursuant to 28 CFR
2.27. Four Commissioners were present,
constituting a quorum when the vote to
close the meeting was submitted.
Public announcement further
describing the subject matter of the
meeting and certifications of General
Counsel that this meeting may be closed
by vote of the Commissioners present
were submitted to the Commissioners
prior to the conduct of any other
business. Upon motion duly made,
seconded, and carried, the following
Commissioners voted that the meeting
be closed: Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J.
Mitchell, Edward F. Reilly, Jr. and
Patricia K. Cushwa.
In witness whereof, I make this official
record of the vote taken to close this
meeting and authorize this record to be
made available to the public.
Dated: October 8, 2009.
Isaac Fulwood,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–25053 Filed 10–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,460]
Delphi Steering Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Bartech and
Securitas, Acro Service Corporation,
Et al.; Saginaw, MI; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Notices
cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on July 14, 2009, applicable
to workers of Delphi Steering, including
on-site leased workers from Bartech and
Securitas, Saginaw, Michigan. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on September 2, 2009 (74 FR
45477).
At the request of the State Agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of steering systems and components
such as steering columns, gears, pumps
and electronic power steering systems.
The company reports that on-site
leased workers from Acro Service Corp.,
Aerotek, Inc., Continental, Inc.,
Dynamic Corp., G–Tech Professional
Staffing, Inc., GlobalEdge Technologies,
Inc. (formerly CAE Tech), Gonzalez
Contract Services, Integrated Partners
Group LLC, Kelly Services, Manpower,
Inc., Rapid Global Business Solutions,
Inc., TAC Worldwide, Trialon Corp.,
Trison Business Solutions and Wright
K. Technologies were employed on-site
at the Saginaw, Michigan location of
Delphi Steering. The Department has
determined that these workers were
sufficiently under the control of the
subject firm to be considered leased
workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased
from the above mentioned firms
working on-site at the Saginaw,
Michigan location of Delphi Steering.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–70,460 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Delphi Steering, including
on-site leased workers from Bartech,
Securitas, Acro Service Corp., Aerotek, Inc.,
Continental, Inc., Dynamic Corp., G–Tech
Professional Staffing, Inc., GlobalEdge
Technologies, Inc., (formerly CAE Tech),
Gonzalez Contract Services, Integrated
Partners Group LLC, Kelly Services,
Manpower, Inc., Rapid Global Business
Solutions, Inc., TAC Worldwide, Trialon
Corp., Trison Business Solutions, and Wright
K. Technologies, Saginaw, Michigan, who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after May 20, 2008,
through July 14, 2011, and all workers in the
group threatened with total or partial
separation from employment on date of
certification through two years from the date
of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:46 Oct 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9–25149 Filed 10–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,808]
Invista, S.A.R.L., Nylon Apparel
Filament Fibers Group, a Subsidiary of
Koch Industries, Inc.; Chattanooga,
TN; Notice of Revised Determination
on Remand
On June 18, 2009, the U.S. Court of
International Trade (USCIT) remanded
to the Department of Labor’s motion for
further investigation the matter Former
Employees of Invista, S.A.R.L. v. U.S.
Secretary of Labor, Court No. 07–00160.
On December 15, 2006, an official of
Invista, S.A.R.L, Nylon Apparel
Filament Fibers Group, A Subsidiary of
Koch Industries, Inc., Chattanooga,
Tennessee (Invista) filed a petition for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) on behalf of workers
and former workers at Invista engaged
in activity related to the production of
nylon fiber. AR 1. The petition stated
that the separations were due to a shift
in production to Mexico that was the
basis for a certification that expired on
August 20, 2006 (TA–W–55,055). AR 2.
The company official stated that, as of
February 1, 2007, all workers of Invista
would be terminated from employment.
AR 7.
On February 7, 2007, the Department
of Labor (Department) issued a negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for TAA/ATAA. AR
30–32. On February 21, 2007, the
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
(72 FR 7909). AR 43.
In support of a request for
administrative reconsideration (dated
February 18, 2007), a worker stated that
the workers’ separations are ‘‘a direct
result of the textile industry going to
developing countries.’’ AR 38.
In a letter dated March 15, 2007, the
Department stated that the request for
reconsideration was being dismissed
because insufficient evidence was
furnished to warrant reconsideration
pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) and that the
shift in production that was the basis for
the certification of TA–W–55,055
occurred outside the relevant period.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53761
AR 45. The Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration was issued on March
21, 2007. AR 47. The Department’s
Notice of dismissal was published in the
Federal Register on March 30, 2007 (72
FR 15169). AR 48.
On May 11, 2007, Plaintiffs sought
review by the USCIT. The Plaintiffs
assert that the worker separations are
due to Invista’s shift in production to
Mexico.
On March 27, 2008, the USCIT
granted the Department’s motion for
voluntary remand and directed the
Department to conduct further
investigation to determine whether
workers of Invista are eligible to apply
for TAA and ATAA.
On June 2, 2008, the Department
issued a Notice of Negative
Determination on Remand based on the
finding that there was no causal nexus
between the worker separations and an
earlier shift in production to Mexico of
articles like or directly competitive with
nylon fiber produced at Invista. SAR 35.
The Department’s Notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on June 10, 2008 (73
FR 32739). SAR 42.
On June 18, 2009, the USCIT ordered
the Department to conduct further
investigation to determine whether
workers of Invista are eligible to apply
for TAA and ATAA.
The group eligibility requirements for
directly-impacted (primary) workers
under Section 222(a) of the Trade Act of
1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A)—all of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of
the workers in such workers’ firm, or an
appropriate subdivision of the firm, have
become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such
firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles produced
by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in
sales or production of such firm or
subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B)—both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of
the workers in such workers’ firm, or an
appropriate subdivision of the firm, have
become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by
such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign
country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
by such firm or subdivision; and
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53760-53761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25149]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-70,460]
Delphi Steering Including On-Site Leased Workers From Bartech and
Securitas, Acro Service Corporation, Et al.; Saginaw, MI; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
[[Page 53761]]
issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on July 14, 2009, applicable to workers of Delphi Steering,
including on-site leased workers from Bartech and Securitas, Saginaw,
Michigan. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September
2, 2009 (74 FR 45477).
At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged
in the production of steering systems and components such as steering
columns, gears, pumps and electronic power steering systems.
The company reports that on-site leased workers from Acro Service
Corp., Aerotek, Inc., Continental, Inc., Dynamic Corp., G-Tech
Professional Staffing, Inc., GlobalEdge Technologies, Inc. (formerly
CAE Tech), Gonzalez Contract Services, Integrated Partners Group LLC,
Kelly Services, Manpower, Inc., Rapid Global Business Solutions, Inc.,
TAC Worldwide, Trialon Corp., Trison Business Solutions and Wright K.
Technologies were employed on-site at the Saginaw, Michigan location of
Delphi Steering. The Department has determined that these workers were
sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered
leased workers.
Based on these findings, the Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased from the above mentioned firms
working on-site at the Saginaw, Michigan location of Delphi Steering.
The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,460 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Delphi Steering, including on-site leased workers
from Bartech, Securitas, Acro Service Corp., Aerotek, Inc.,
Continental, Inc., Dynamic Corp., G-Tech Professional Staffing,
Inc., GlobalEdge Technologies, Inc., (formerly CAE Tech), Gonzalez
Contract Services, Integrated Partners Group LLC, Kelly Services,
Manpower, Inc., Rapid Global Business Solutions, Inc., TAC
Worldwide, Trialon Corp., Trison Business Solutions, and Wright K.
Technologies, Saginaw, Michigan, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after May 20, 2008, through July 14,
2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial
separation from employment on date of certification through two
years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-25149 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
