Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Notice of Revocation in Part, 52452-52454 [E9-24536]
Download as PDF
52452
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 13, 2009 / Notices
semi-annual new shipper review of the
antidumping duty order on chlorinated
isocyanurates from the People’s
Republic of China, covering the period
June 1, 2008, through November 30,
2008, and the exporter, Juancheng
Kangtai Chemical co., Ltd. (‘‘Kangtai’’).
See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of June 2008 through November
2008 Semi-Annual New Shipper Review,
74 FR 37007 (July 27, 2009). The final
results are currently due on October 18,
2009.
Extension of Time Limits for Final
Results
Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the
Department to issue the final results of
a new shipper review within 90 days
after the date on which the preliminary
results were issued. The Department
may, however, extend the 90-day period
for completion of the final results of a
new shipper review to 150 days if it
determines that the case is
extraordinarily complicated. See section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(i)(2).
As a result of issues raised in this new
shipper review, specifically the issue of
collapsing Kangtai into a single entity
with its affiliated supplier, certain
surrogate values, and surrogate financial
ratios, the Department determines that
this new shipper review is
extraordinarily complicated and it
cannot complete this new shipper
review within the current time limit.
Accordingly, the Department is
extending the time limit for the
completion of the final results by 60
days until December 17, 2009, in
accordance with sections
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(i)(2).
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: October 6, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–24600 Filed 10–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:29 Oct 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–898]
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for the Final
Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Moats or Charles Riggle, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5047 or (202) 482–
0650, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 8, 2009, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on chlorinated
isocyanurates from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Administrative Review, 74 FR
27104 (June 8, 2009). This review covers
the period June 1, 2007, through May
31, 2008. The final results of review are
currently due no later than October 6,
2009.
Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results of Review
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department shall issue the
final results of an administrative review
within 120 days after the date on which
the preliminary results are published.
However, if it is not practicable to
complete the review within this time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
allows the Department to extend the
time period to a maximum of 180 days.
Completion of the final results of this
review within the 120-day period is not
practicable because the Department
needs additional time to analyze and
address complicated by–product and
surrogate value issues for the final
results. Because it is not practicable to
complete this review within the time
specified under the Act, we are
extending the time period for issuing
the final results of the administrative
review by 30 days in accordance with
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Therefore, the final results will be due
Thursday, November 5, 2009, which is
150 days from publication of the
preliminary results.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 2, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–24604 Filed 10–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–822]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review and Notice of
Revocation in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2009.
SUMMARY: On August 5, 2009, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
preliminary results of changed
circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on frozen
warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from
Thailand. In that notice, we
preliminarily determined that it was
appropriate to treat the Rubicon Group
inclusive of Phatthana Frozen Food Co.,
Ltd. (PFF) and Sea Wealth Frozen Food
Co., Ltd. (Sea Wealth) as the successorin-interest to the Rubicon Group as it
operated during the period of
investigation (POI) of the less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation. Further, we
preliminarily determined that it was
appropriate to revoke PFF and Sea
Wealth from the antidumping duty
order on shrimp from Thailand,
effective as of January 16, 2009. See
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Thailand: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review and Notice of
Intent to Revoke in Part, 74 FR 39042
(Aug. 5, 2009) (Preliminary Results). For
these final results the Department
continues to find that the current form
of the Rubicon Group, inclusive of PFF
and Sea Wealth, is the successor-ininterest to the Rubicon Group as it
operated during the LTFV investigation.
Accordingly, we are revoking PFF and
Sea Wealth from the antidumping duty
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 13, 2009 / Notices
order on shrimp from Thailand,
effective as of January 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Henry Almond; AD/CVD Operations,
Office 2, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0049.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On February 1, 2005, the Department
published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from
Thailand. See Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp From Thailand, 70 FR 5145
(Feb. 1, 2005) (Thai Shrimp Order).
Subsequent to the issuance of this
order, the Thai Government challenged
before the World Trade Organization
(WTO) the Department’s practice of not
offsetting dumped sales with nondumped sales in the LTFV investigation
of shrimp from Thailand. In February
2008, the WTO dispute settlement panel
found that the Department acted
inconsistently with its international
obligations when it performed averageto-average comparisons without
providing offsets for comparisons where
the export price was greater than normal
value in the LTFV investigation. See
United States—Measures Relating to
Shrimp from Thailand, WT/DS343/R
(February 29, 2008).
In November 2008, the Department
initiated a section 129 proceeding to
implement the findings of the WTO
panel, and in January 2009 it issued a
final determination in that proceeding
which resulted in the revocation of the
order related to shrimp produced and
exported by two entities—Thai I-Mei
and the Rubicon Group. See
Implementation of the Findings of the
WTO Panel in United States—
Antidumping Measure on Shrimp From
Thailand: Notice of Determination
Under section 129 of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act and Partial
Revocation of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Thailand, 74 FR 5638, 5638 (Jan.
30, 2009) (Section 129 Implementation).
For purposes of the section 129
Implementation, the Department
defined the Rubicon Group as consisting
of the following nine companies, which
were the group members existing at the
time of the LTFV investigation:
Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd.,
Chanthaburi Frozen Food Co., Ltd.,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:29 Oct 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
Chanthaburi Seafoods Co., Ltd., Intersia
Foods Co., Ltd., Phatthana Seafood Co.,
Ltd., S.C.C. Frozen Seafood Co., Ltd.,
Thailand Fishery Cold Storage Public
Co., Ltd., Thai International Seafoods
Co., Ltd., and Wales & Co. Universe
Limited. See section 129
Implementation at 5639.
On February 5, 2009, the Rubicon
Group requested that the Department
conduct an expedited changed
circumstances review under 19 CFR
351.221(c)(3)(iii) to consider also
revoking PFF and Sea Wealth from the
Thai Shrimp Order. According to the
Rubicon Group, although these two
companies were not included in the
Department’s margin calculations in the
LTFV investigation, the Department has
treated them as part of the Rubicon
Group in subsequent segments of this
proceeding. In this request, the Rubicon
Group also asked that any revocation for
PFF and Sea Wealth be made effective
January 16, 2009, the effective date of
the section 129 Implementation.
On March 24, 2009, the Department
published a notice of initiation of a
changed circumstances review to
consider the Rubicon Group’s request.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from Thailand: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, 74 FR 12308
(Mar. 24, 2009) (Initiation Notice).
On August 5, 2009, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
changed circumstances review, where
we preliminarily determined that it was
appropriate to treat the Rubicon Group
inclusive of PFF and Sea Wealth as the
successor-in-interest to the Rubicon
Group as it operated during LTFV
investigation. Further, we preliminarily
determined that it was appropriate to
revoke PFF and Sea Wealth from the
antidumping duty order on shrimp from
Thailand. See Preliminary Results at
39044. Subsequent to the Preliminary
Results we received no comments from
interested parties.
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order includes
certain frozen warmwater shrimp and
prawns, whether wild-caught (ocean
harvested) or farm-raised (produced by
aquaculture), head-on or head-off, shellon or peeled, tail-on or tail-off,1
deveined or not deveined, cooked or
raw, or otherwise processed in frozen
form.
The frozen warmwater shrimp and
prawn products included in the scope of
this order, regardless of definitions in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
1 ‘‘Tails’’ in this context means the tail fan, which
includes the telson and the uropods.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52453
United States (HTSUS), are products
which are processed from warmwater
shrimp and prawns through freezing
and which are sold in any count size.
The products described above may be
processed from any species of
warmwater shrimp and prawns.
Warmwater shrimp and prawns are
generally classified in, but are not
limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some
examples of the farmed and wild-caught
warmwater species include, but are not
limited to, whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus
vannemei), banana prawn (Penaeus
merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus
chinensis), giant river prawn
(Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger
prawn (Penaeus monodon), redspotted
shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern
brown shrimp (Penaeus subtilis),
southern pink shrimp (Penaeus
notialis), southern rough shrimp
(Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern
white shrimp (Penaeus schmitti), blue
shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western
white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis),
and Indian white prawn (Penaeus
indicus).
Frozen shrimp and prawns that are
packed with marinade, spices or sauce
are included in the scope of this order.
In addition, food preparations, which
are not ‘‘prepared meals,’’ that contain
more than 20 percent by weight of
shrimp or prawn are also included in
the scope of this order.
Excluded from the scope are: (1)
Breaded shrimp and prawns (HTSUS
subheading 1605.20.10.20); (2) shrimp
and prawns generally classified in the
Pandalidae family and commonly
referred to as coldwater shrimp, in any
state of processing; (3) fresh shrimp and
prawns whether shell-on or peeled
(HTSUS subheadings 0306.23.00.20 and
0306.23.00.40); (4) shrimp and prawns
in prepared meals (HTSUS subheading
1605.20.05.10); (5) dried shrimp and
prawns; (6) canned warmwater shrimp
and prawns (HTSUS subheading
1605.20.10.40); (7) certain dusted
shrimp; and (8) certain battered shrimp.
Dusted shrimp is a shrimp-based
product: (1) That is produced from fresh
(or thawed-from-frozen) and peeled
shrimp; (2) to which a ‘‘dusting’’ layer
of rice or wheat flour of at least 95
percent purity has been applied; (3)
with the entire surface of the shrimp
flesh thoroughly and evenly coated with
the flour; (4) with the non-shrimp
content of the end product constituting
between four and 10 percent of the
product’s total weight after being
dusted, but prior to being frozen; and (5)
that is subjected to IQF freezing
immediately after application of the
dusting layer. Battered shrimp is a
shrimp-based product that, when dusted
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
52454
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 13, 2009 / Notices
in accordance with the definition of
dusting above, is coated with a wet
viscous layer containing egg and/or
milk, and par-fried.
The products covered by this order
are currently classified under the
following HTSUS subheadings:
0306.13.00.03, 0306.13.00.06,
0306.13.00.09, 0306.13.00.12,
0306.13.00.15, 0306.13.00.18,
0306.13.00.21, 0306.13.00.24,
0306.13.00.27, 0306.13.00.40,
1605.20.10.10, and 1605.20.10.30. These
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and for customs purposes
only and are not dispositive, but rather
the written description of the scope of
this order is dispositive.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review
For the reasons stated in the
preliminary results, the Department
continues to find that the Rubicon
Group in its current form, including PFF
and Sea Wealth, is the successor-ininterest to the Rubicon Group as it
existed during the POI of the LTFV
investigation. Therefore, consistent with
our preliminary results, we have
revoked PFF and Sea Wealth from the
Thai Shrimp Order, effective January 16,
2009 (the effective date of the section
129 Implementation). This revocation
applies to merchandise produced by any
Rubicon Group member and exported
by PFF or Sea Wealth, as well as to
merchandise produced by PFF or Sea
Wealth and exported by any other
Rubicon Group member.
Notification
We will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the
suspension of liquidation for all
shipments of frozen warmwater shrimp
produced and exported by PFF or Sea
Wealth, either singly or in combination
with any other Rubicon Group member.
Further, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate without regard to
antidumping duties (release all bonds
and refund all cash deposits) entries of
frozen warmwater shrimp produced and
exported by these entities, entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after January 16,
2009.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:29 Oct 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.216.
Dated: October 6, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–24536 Filed 10–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 39–2009]
Foreign-Trade Zone 138 Columbus,
Ohio Application for Subzone Status,
Abercrombie & Fitch, (Footwear and
Apparel Distribution), New Albany, OH
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign–Trade Zones Board (the
Board) by the Columbus Regional
Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 138,
requesting special–purpose subzone
status for the footwear and apparel
warehousing and distribution facility of
Abercrombie & Fitch (A&F), located in
New Albany, Ohio. The application was
submitted pursuant to the provisions of
the Foreign–Trade Zones Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the
regulations of the Board (15 CFR part
400). It was formally filed on September
25, 2009.
The A&F facility (453 acres, 2,631,585
sq. ft., 3,407 employees) is located at
6201/6301 Fitch Path & 7795 Smiths
Mill Road, New Albany, Ohio. The
facility is used for warehousing and
distribution of foreign–origin apparel
and footwear for the U.S. market and
export. FTZ procedures would be
utilized to support A&F’s U.S.-based
distribution activity. Foreign products
to be admitted to the proposed subzone
for distribution would include men’s,
boys’, women’s and girls’ footwear,
coats, suits, blazers, blouses, trousers,
breeches, shorts, shirts, skirts, tops, ski
jackets, underwear, petticoats, pajamas,
swimwear, scarves, hats, shawls,
mufflers, gloves and mittens. Certain
textile fabrics (wool, cotton, silk; woven
and knit) would also be distributed from
the proposed subzone. Additional
products that would be admitted to the
proposed subzone for distribution are:
articles of plastic; various vanity,
˘
attache brief and suitcases; handtools;
machinery; jewelry; leather goods;
paintings, lamps; and, spotlights. The
applicant is not seeking manufacturing
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or processing authority with this
request.
FTZ procedures could exempt A&F
from customs duty payments on foreign
products that are exported (about 2% of
shipments). On its domestic sales, the
company would be able to defer duty
payments until the foreign merchandise
is shipped from the facility and entered
for consumption. FTZ designation
would further allow A&F to realize
logistical benefits through the use of
weekly customs entry procedures. The
request indicates that the savings from
FTZ procedures would help improve
the facility’s international
competitiveness.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Claudia Hausler of the FTZ
Staff is designated examiner to evaluate
and analyze the facts and information
presented in the application and case
record and report findings and
recommendations to the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions (original
and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
address below. The closing period for
their receipt is December 14, 2009.
Rebuttal comments in response to
material submitted during the foregoing
period may be submitted during the
subsequent 15-day period to December
28, 2009.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading
Room’’ section of the Board’s website,
which is accessible via www.trade.gov/
ftz. For further information, contact
Claudia Hausler at
Claudia_Hausler@ita.doc.gov, or (202)
482–1379.
Dated: September 25, 2009.
Pierre V. Duy,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–24605 Filed 10–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 41–2009]
Foreign-Trade Zone 158—Vicksburg/
Jackson, MS, Application for Subzone;
Max Home, LLC (Upholstered
Furniture); Fulton and Iuka, MS
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the
Board) by the Greater Mississippi
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52452-52454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24536]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-822]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Notice of Revocation
in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2009.
SUMMARY: On August 5, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published a notice of preliminary results of changed circumstances
review of the antidumping duty order on frozen warmwater shrimp
(shrimp) from Thailand. In that notice, we preliminarily determined
that it was appropriate to treat the Rubicon Group inclusive of
Phatthana Frozen Food Co., Ltd. (PFF) and Sea Wealth Frozen Food Co.,
Ltd. (Sea Wealth) as the successor-in-interest to the Rubicon Group as
it operated during the period of investigation (POI) of the less-than-
fair-value (LTFV) investigation. Further, we preliminarily determined
that it was appropriate to revoke PFF and Sea Wealth from the
antidumping duty order on shrimp from Thailand, effective as of January
16, 2009. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review
and Notice of Intent to Revoke in Part, 74 FR 39042 (Aug. 5, 2009)
(Preliminary Results). For these final results the Department continues
to find that the current form of the Rubicon Group, inclusive of PFF
and Sea Wealth, is the successor-in-interest to the Rubicon Group as it
operated during the LTFV investigation. Accordingly, we are revoking
PFF and Sea Wealth from the antidumping duty
[[Page 52453]]
order on shrimp from Thailand, effective as of January 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Henry Almond; AD/CVD Operations,
Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0049.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 1, 2005, the Department published in the Federal
Register an antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp
from Thailand. See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand, 70 FR 5145 (Feb. 1, 2005) (Thai Shrimp
Order).
Subsequent to the issuance of this order, the Thai Government
challenged before the World Trade Organization (WTO) the Department's
practice of not offsetting dumped sales with non-dumped sales in the
LTFV investigation of shrimp from Thailand. In February 2008, the WTO
dispute settlement panel found that the Department acted inconsistently
with its international obligations when it performed average-to-average
comparisons without providing offsets for comparisons where the export
price was greater than normal value in the LTFV investigation. See
United States--Measures Relating to Shrimp from Thailand, WT/DS343/R
(February 29, 2008).
In November 2008, the Department initiated a section 129 proceeding
to implement the findings of the WTO panel, and in January 2009 it
issued a final determination in that proceeding which resulted in the
revocation of the order related to shrimp produced and exported by two
entities--Thai I-Mei and the Rubicon Group. See Implementation of the
Findings of the WTO Panel in United States--Antidumping Measure on
Shrimp From Thailand: Notice of Determination Under section 129 of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand, 74 FR 5638, 5638
(Jan. 30, 2009) (Section 129 Implementation). For purposes of the
section 129 Implementation, the Department defined the Rubicon Group as
consisting of the following nine companies, which were the group
members existing at the time of the LTFV investigation: Andaman Seafood
Co., Ltd., Chanthaburi Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Chanthaburi Seafoods Co.,
Ltd., Intersia Foods Co., Ltd., Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd., S.C.C.
Frozen Seafood Co., Ltd., Thailand Fishery Cold Storage Public Co.,
Ltd., Thai International Seafoods Co., Ltd., and Wales & Co. Universe
Limited. See section 129 Implementation at 5639.
On February 5, 2009, the Rubicon Group requested that the
Department conduct an expedited changed circumstances review under 19
CFR 351.221(c)(3)(iii) to consider also revoking PFF and Sea Wealth
from the Thai Shrimp Order. According to the Rubicon Group, although
these two companies were not included in the Department's margin
calculations in the LTFV investigation, the Department has treated them
as part of the Rubicon Group in subsequent segments of this proceeding.
In this request, the Rubicon Group also asked that any revocation for
PFF and Sea Wealth be made effective January 16, 2009, the effective
date of the section 129 Implementation.
On March 24, 2009, the Department published a notice of initiation
of a changed circumstances review to consider the Rubicon Group's
request. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Initiation
of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 74 FR 12308 (Mar. 24,
2009) (Initiation Notice).
On August 5, 2009, the Department published the preliminary results
of the changed circumstances review, where we preliminarily determined
that it was appropriate to treat the Rubicon Group inclusive of PFF and
Sea Wealth as the successor-in-interest to the Rubicon Group as it
operated during LTFV investigation. Further, we preliminarily
determined that it was appropriate to revoke PFF and Sea Wealth from
the antidumping duty order on shrimp from Thailand. See Preliminary
Results at 39044. Subsequent to the Preliminary Results we received no
comments from interested parties.
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order includes certain frozen warmwater shrimp
and prawns, whether wild-caught (ocean harvested) or farm-raised
(produced by aquaculture), head-on or head-off, shell-on or peeled,
tail-on or tail-off,\1\ deveined or not deveined, cooked or raw, or
otherwise processed in frozen form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Tails'' in this context means the tail fan, which includes
the telson and the uropods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The frozen warmwater shrimp and prawn products included in the
scope of this order, regardless of definitions in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), are products which are processed
from warmwater shrimp and prawns through freezing and which are sold in
any count size. The products described above may be processed from any
species of warmwater shrimp and prawns. Warmwater shrimp and prawns are
generally classified in, but are not limited to, the Penaeidae family.
Some examples of the farmed and wild-caught warmwater species include,
but are not limited to, whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannemei), banana
prawn (Penaeus merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus chinensis), giant
river prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger prawn (Penaeus
monodon), redspotted shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern brown
shrimp (Penaeus subtilis), southern pink shrimp (Penaeus notialis),
southern rough shrimp (Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern white
shrimp (Penaeus schmitti), blue shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western
white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), and Indian white prawn (Penaeus
indicus).
Frozen shrimp and prawns that are packed with marinade, spices or
sauce are included in the scope of this order. In addition, food
preparations, which are not ``prepared meals,'' that contain more than
20 percent by weight of shrimp or prawn are also included in the scope
of this order.
Excluded from the scope are: (1) Breaded shrimp and prawns (HTSUS
subheading 1605.20.10.20); (2) shrimp and prawns generally classified
in the Pandalidae family and commonly referred to as coldwater shrimp,
in any state of processing; (3) fresh shrimp and prawns whether shell-
on or peeled (HTSUS subheadings 0306.23.00.20 and 0306.23.00.40); (4)
shrimp and prawns in prepared meals (HTSUS subheading 1605.20.05.10);
(5) dried shrimp and prawns; (6) canned warmwater shrimp and prawns
(HTSUS subheading 1605.20.10.40); (7) certain dusted shrimp; and (8)
certain battered shrimp. Dusted shrimp is a shrimp-based product: (1)
That is produced from fresh (or thawed-from-frozen) and peeled shrimp;
(2) to which a ``dusting'' layer of rice or wheat flour of at least 95
percent purity has been applied; (3) with the entire surface of the
shrimp flesh thoroughly and evenly coated with the flour; (4) with the
non-shrimp content of the end product constituting between four and 10
percent of the product's total weight after being dusted, but prior to
being frozen; and (5) that is subjected to IQF freezing immediately
after application of the dusting layer. Battered shrimp is a shrimp-
based product that, when dusted
[[Page 52454]]
in accordance with the definition of dusting above, is coated with a
wet viscous layer containing egg and/or milk, and par-fried.
The products covered by this order are currently classified under
the following HTSUS subheadings: 0306.13.00.03, 0306.13.00.06,
0306.13.00.09, 0306.13.00.12, 0306.13.00.15, 0306.13.00.18,
0306.13.00.21, 0306.13.00.24, 0306.13.00.27, 0306.13.00.40,
1605.20.10.10, and 1605.20.10.30. These HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and for customs purposes only and are not dispositive,
but rather the written description of the scope of this order is
dispositive.
Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review
For the reasons stated in the preliminary results, the Department
continues to find that the Rubicon Group in its current form, including
PFF and Sea Wealth, is the successor-in-interest to the Rubicon Group
as it existed during the POI of the LTFV investigation. Therefore,
consistent with our preliminary results, we have revoked PFF and Sea
Wealth from the Thai Shrimp Order, effective January 16, 2009 (the
effective date of the section 129 Implementation). This revocation
applies to merchandise produced by any Rubicon Group member and
exported by PFF or Sea Wealth, as well as to merchandise produced by
PFF or Sea Wealth and exported by any other Rubicon Group member.
Notification
We will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
terminate the suspension of liquidation for all shipments of frozen
warmwater shrimp produced and exported by PFF or Sea Wealth, either
singly or in combination with any other Rubicon Group member. Further,
the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to
antidumping duties (release all bonds and refund all cash deposits)
entries of frozen warmwater shrimp produced and exported by these
entities, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after January 16, 2009.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written notification of
the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and 19 CFR 351.216.
Dated: October 6, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-24536 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P