Notice of Proposed Individual Exemption Involving Chrysler LLC, Located in Auburn Hills, MI, 51182-51195 [E9-23849]
Download as PDF
51182
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,089]
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc., a
Subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum
Corporation, New Castle, DE; Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated August 19, 2009,
a company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility for workers and
former workers of the subject firm to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA). The denial notice was signed on
July 24, 2009 and published in the
Federal Register on September 2, 2009
(74 FR 45478).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The TAA petition filed on behalf of
workers at Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.,
a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum
Corporation, New Castle, Delaware was
based on the finding that imports of
services like or directly competitive
with services provided by workers of
the subject firm did not contribute to
worker separations at the subject firm
during the relevant period. The
investigation revealed that workers of
the subject firm were engaged in
refining facility’s water, removing
sludge from machines, repairing the
building’s electrical system, distributing
the anhydrous potassium hydroxide and
closing the facility. The subject firm did
not import nor acquire services from a
foreign country and also did not shift
the provision of these services to a
foreign country.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner stated that workers of the
subject firm were previously certified
eligible for TAA based on increased
imports of chlorine. The petitioner
further stated that even though
production of chlorine did not occur at
the subject facility in the relevant
period, workers of the subject firm were
retained by the subject firm to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
effectively close the plant. The
petitioner appears to allege that because
workers of the subject firm were
previously certified eligible for TAA
and the workers of the current petition
were the part of that worker group but
stayed employed beyond the expiration
date of the previous certification, the
workers of the subject firm should be
granted another TAA certification.
The workers of Glenn Springs
Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of
Occidental Petroleum Corporation, New
Castle, Delaware were previously
certified eligible for TAA under petition
numbers TA–W–58,508, which expired
on January 12, 2008. The investigation
revealed that at that time workers of the
subject firm were engaged in production
of chlorine and the employment
declines at the subject facility were
attributed to increased imports of
chlorine. However, the current
investigation revealed that production
of chlorine at the subject firm ceased
during November 2007.
When assessing eligibility for TAA,
the Department exclusively considers
worker activities during the relevant
time period (from one year prior to the
date of the petition). Therefore, events
occurring in 2007 are outside of the
relevant period and are not considered
in this investigation.
The investigation revealed that
workers of the subject firm were
engaged in refining facility’s water,
removing sludge from machines,
repairing the building’s electrical
system, distributing the anhydrous
potassium hydroxide and closing the
facility during the relevant period.
These functions, as described above,
were not imported, or shifted abroad nor
were the service acquired from a foreign
country during the relevant period.
Therefore, criteria II.A. and II.B. of
Section 222(a) of the Act were not met.
Furthermore, with the respect to Section
222(c) of the Act, the investigation
revealed that criterion 2 was not met
because the workers did not supply a
service that was used by a firm with
TAA-certified workers in the production
of an article or supply of a service that
was a basis for TAA certification.
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day
of September 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9–23910 Filed 10–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Application No. L–11566]
Notice of Proposed Individual
Exemption Involving Chrysler LLC,
Located in Auburn Hills, MI
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed individual
exemption.
This document contains a notice of
pendency before the Department of
Labor (the Department) of a proposed
individual exemption from certain
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (the Act or ERISA). The
transactions involve the UAW Chrysler
Retiree Medical Benefits Plan (the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan) and its associated
UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
(the VEBA Trust) (collectively the
VEBA).1 The proposed exemption, if
granted, would affect the VEBA, its
participants and beneficiaries.
Effective Date: If granted, this
proposed exemption will be effective as
of June 10, 2009.
DATES: Written comments and requests
for a public hearing on the proposed
exemption should be submitted to the
Department within 45 days from the
date of publication of this Federal
Register Notice.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and
requests for a public hearing concerning
the proposed exemption should be sent
to the Office of Exemption
1 Because the New Chrysler VEBA Plan will not
be qualified under section 401 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, there is no jurisdiction
under Title II of the Act pursuant to section 4975
of the Code. However, there is jurisdiction under
Title I of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
Determinations, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Room N–5700,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington
DC 20210, Attention: Application No.
L–11566. Interested persons are also
invited to submit comments and/or
hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or
FAX. Any such comments or requests
should be sent either by e-mail to:
chrysler@dol.gov, or by FAX to (202)
219–0204 by the end of the scheduled
comment period. The application for
exemption and the comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Public Documents Room of the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–1513, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian J. Buyniski or Warren Blinder,
Office of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, telephone (202) 693–8566. (This
is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document contains a notice of proposed
individual exemption from the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A),
406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(a)(1)(E),
406(a)(2), 406(b)(1), 406(b)(2), and
407(a) of ERISA. The proposed
exemption has been requested in an
application filed by New Chrysler
pursuant to section 408(a) of ERISA and
in accordance with the procedures set
forth in 29 CFR 2570, Subpart B (55 FR
32836, August 10, 1990). Effective
December 31, 1978, section 102 of
Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, (43
FR 47713, October 17, 1978) transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Accordingly, this proposed exemption
is being issued solely by the
Department.
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Summary of Facts and
Representations2
The Applicant
Prior to filing for bankruptcy
protection under chapter 11 of Title 11
of the United States Code (the
Bankruptcy Code) on April 30, 2009,
Chrysler LLC (Chrysler LLC), a Delaware
limited liability company, was an
American automobile manufacturer
headquartered in Auburn Hills,
Michigan, first organized as Chrysler
Corporation in 1925. Chrysler LLC
manufactured, assembled, and sold cars,
2 The Summary of Facts and Representations is
based on the Applicant’s representations and does
not reflect the views of the Department.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
trucks, and related automotive parts and
accessories primarily in the United
States, Canada, and Mexico. It supplied
passenger cars, SUVs, sports tourers,
minivans, and pickups. The company
also purchased and distributed
passenger cars manufactured by
Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of
America. Prior to filing for bankruptcy
protection, Chrysler LLC employed
approximately 55,000 hourly and
salaried employees worldwide, about
70% of whom were based in the United
States. As of the date of the exemption
application filing, Chrysler LLC had 32
manufacturing and assembly facilities,
23 of which (or 69% of the vehicle
production) are located in the United
States, and 24 parts depots, 20 of which
are in this country. Chrysler’s business
interests touched all 50 states, as well as
Canada, Mexico, Europe and Asia.
Chrysler LLC has an expansive dealer
network, with over 3,200 dealerships in
the United States selling Chrysler cars
and trucks (or 60% of the global dealer
network). Seventy-two percent of
Chrysler LLC’s sales were in the United
States, and it purchased 78% of its parts
and materials from U.S.-based suppliers.
For the twelve months ended December
31, 2008, Chrysler LLC recorded
revenue of more than $48.5 billion and
had assets of approximately $39.3
billion and liabilities totaling $55.2
billion. During the same period,
Chrysler LLC had a net loss of
approximately $16.8 billion.
From 1998 to 2007, Chrysler and its
subsidiaries were part of the German
based DaimlerChrysler AG (now
Daimler AG). Under DaimlerChrysler,
the company was named
‘‘DaimlerChrysler Motors Company
LLC’’, with its U.S. operations generally
referred to as the ‘‘Chrysler Group’’. On
May 14, 2007, DaimlerChrysler
announced the sale of 80.1% of Chrysler
Group to American private equity firm
Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.,
with Daimler continuing to hold a
19.9% stake. The deal was finalized on
August 3, 2007, and upon completion of
the sale, the company was renamed
Chrysler LLC. On April 27, 2009,
Daimler AG signed a binding agreement
to give up its 19.9% remaining stake in
Chrysler LLC to Cerberus Capital
Management and pay as much as $600
million into the automaker’s pension
fund.
On May 31, 2009, in the course of the
bankruptcy proceeding (the Bankruptcy
Proceeding), the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York (the Bankruptcy
Court) issued an opinion granting
Chrysler LLC’s motion for authority to
sell, pursuant to section 363 of the
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51183
Bankruptcy Code, substantially all of its
assets to an entity called New Chrysler
(New Chrysler).3 New Chrysler is a
Delaware limited liability company
formed by Fiat North America LLC, a
subsidiary of Fiat S.p.A (Fiat). New
Chrysler expects to remain
headquartered in Auburn Hills,
Michigan, and expects to employ most
of Chrysler’s approximately 55,000
hourly and salaried employees
worldwide, 70% or 38,500 of whom
were based in the United States and still
manufactures, assembles, and sells cars,
trucks, and related automotive parts and
accessories in the United States, Europe,
Canada, and Mexico. Pursuant to the
UAW Retiree Settlement Agreement
between New Chrysler and the UAW
(the Settlement Agreement), the UAW
Chrysler Retiree Medical Benefits Plan
(the New Chrysler VEBA Plan) will be
established to provide retiree medical
benefits to certain Chrysler-UAW
represented employees and retirees, and
their spouses and dependents.4
Background
Throughout much of 2007, Chrysler
LLC and the UAW engaged in extended
discussions concerning the impact of
rising health care costs on Chrysler
LLC’s financial condition. During these
discussions, Chrysler LLC asserted that
it had the right to unilaterally modify
the retiree health benefits under the
Chrysler Health Care Program for
Hourly Employees and that, if no
agreement was reached to address the
economic burden of its retiree health
obligation, Chrysler LLC would do so
unilaterally. The UAW disagreed with
Chrysler LLC’s position and asserted
that retiree benefits were vested and that
Chrysler LLC did not have the right to
modify them unilaterally. In 2007, the
UAW along with respective class
representatives of plaintiff class
members in UAW v. Chrysler LLC (the
‘‘English’’ Case) filed a lawsuit
challenging Chrysler LLC’s position and
sought a permanent injunction
prohibiting such termination or
modification. After an extensive review
by the UAW and Class Counsel (Class
Counsel) of Chrysler LLC’s ability to
continue providing retiree health care
benefits, the parties entered into a
Settlement Agreement (English
Settlement Agreement) on March 30,
2008, providing, among other things,
3 In re Chrysler LLC, et al., No. 09B 50002
(Document 3073), slip op. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 31,
2009).
4 Specifically, the New Chrysler VEBA Plan will
provide retiree medical benefits to members of the
‘‘Class’’ and the ‘‘Covered Group’’ as defined in the
Settlement Agreement and in Section VI. of this
exemption.
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
51184
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
that Chrysler LLC transfer responsibility
and funding for retiree health care
benefits to a voluntary employee
benefits association.5
The English Settlement Agreement
provided that on the later of January 1,
2010, or final court approval of the
Settlement Agreement, Chrysler LLC
would continue to provide retiree
medical benefits for class members,
known as the ‘‘Covered Group’’, under
the old Chrysler Plan and would
transfer certain assets to the VEBA Trust
to provide the Class and Covered Group
with post-retirement medical benefits.
The English Settlement Agreement
modified existing retiree medical
benefits and Chrysler LLC was obligated
to provide benefits until January 1,
2010, and then funding of the benefits
would be shifted to the VEBA Trust.
Under the English Settlement
Agreement, Chrysler LLC’s obligation to
provide post-retirement medical
benefits to the Class and Covered Group
would be terminated. The Trust would
be established and maintained not by
Chrysler LLC, but by an employees’
beneficiary association consisting of the
population described in the English
Settlement Agreement and administered
by an independent committee
(‘‘Committee’’). A Plan, to be funded
exclusively through the VEBA Trust,
would be solely responsible for the
payment of post-retirement medical
benefits to members of the Class and
Covered Group on and after January 1,
2010.
In September of 2008, a sharp
downturn in sales significantly affected
Chrysler LLC. Soon thereafter, Chrysler
LLC focused its attention on acquiring a
merger partner, but talks were put on
5 In 2007 and 2009, Chrysler LLC agreed to
provide certain retiree medical benefits specified in
certain memoranda of understanding between
Chrysler, the UAW and the class representatives.
Chrysler LLC and the UAW, along with respective
class representatives of plaintiff class members in
UAW v. Chrysler, LLC, Civ. Act. No. 2:07–cv–14310
(E.D. Mich, complaint filed October 11, 2007) (the
‘‘English’’ Case) entered into a separate settlement
agreement in 2007, which provided for Chrysler
LLC to make certain deposits and remittances to the
UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust for the
provision of retiree medical benefits.
In light of the Bankruptcy Proceeding, the
settlement in the English case is of no further effect.
Although not a party to the Bankruptcy Proceeding
or the Modified Settlement Agreement described in
this exemption application, the firm of Stember,
Feinstein, Doyle & Payne, LLC, as Class Counsel in
the English case, was engaged to render an opinion
on the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the consideration to be received by Chrysler LLC in
connection with the sale of assets to New Chrysler
(the Sale), and also to review the Modified
Settlement Agreement described in this exemption
application. Class Counsel concurs that it is fair,
reasonable and in the best interest of the former
class members, and supports the request by New
Chrysler for an individual exemption request.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
hold while the company sought
government funds to prevent
bankruptcy. In December of 2008,
Chrysler LLC received a $4 billion loan
from the United States Treasury
Department to fund their operations
through the liquidity crunch. At the
same time that Chrysler LLC was
pursuing government assistance, it
continued its efforts to secure a strategic
partner that could assist it in achieving
its long-term viability goals. Pursuant to
the terms of the loan, Chrysler LLC was
required to submit a plan showing that
it was able to achieve and sustain longterm viability, energy efficiency,
rationalization of costs and
competitiveness in the U.S.
marketplace, which would indicate
Chrysler LLC’s ability to repay the
financing.
These long-term production goals led
Chrysler LLC to announce that they
were going to form a global alliance
with Fiat S.p.A. On January 20, 2009,
Fiat and Chrysler LLC announced that
they had a non-binding term sheet to
form a global alliance. Under the terms
of the potential agreement, Fiat could
take a 35% stake in Chrysler LLC and
gain access to its North American dealer
network in exchange for providing
Chrysler LLC with the platform to build
smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles in
the US and reciprocal access to Fiat’s
global distribution network. Fiat is an
Italian automobile manufacturer, engine
manufacturer, and financial and
industrial group based in Turin. As of
2009, Fiat is the world’s 6th largest
carmaker as well as Italy’s largest
carmaker.
Bankruptcy
In light of deteriorating market
conditions and a growing liquidity crisis
that would make it impossible for
Chrysler LLC to continue operations,
Chrysler LLC and 26 of its domestic
direct and indirect subsidiaries, filed a
bankruptcy action under chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code (the
‘‘Bankruptcy Code’’) on April 30, 2009
with the Bankruptcy Court and
announced a plan for a partnership with
Italian automaker Fiat.6 As noted
previously, the Bankruptcy Court
approved a sale under Section 363 of
Title 11 of the U.S. Code by which New
Chrysler succeeded to certain assets and
liabilities of Chrysler LLC (‘‘Section 363
Sale’’). The Bankruptcy Court also
approved the Modified Settlement
Agreement. The section 363 Sale closed,
and the Modified Settlement Agreement
was executed, on June 10, 2009. The
assets in the Section 363 Sale were sold
free and clear of liens, claims, interests,
and encumbrances.
Through the Bankruptcy Proceeding,
New Chrysler acquired certain core
assets from Chrysler LLC in exchange
for the assumption of certain liabilities
of Chrysler LLC and a cash payment to
Chrysler LLC pursuant to the Master
Transaction Agreement, dated as of
April 30, 2009 as subsequently amended
(collectively with other ancillary and
supporting documents, the ‘‘MTA’’).
Pursuant to the MTA, Chrysler LLC
transferred substantially all of its
operating assets to New Chrysler, and in
exchange for those assets, New Chrysler
assumed certain liabilities of Chrysler
LLC and paid Chrysler LLC $2 billion in
cash. New Chrysler is jointly owned by
Fiat, the US Treasury, the Governments
of Canada and Ontario (the Canadian
Government) and the VEBA Trust. The
transaction is expected to strengthen
New Chrysler’s viability for the long
term with access to Fiat’s existing
technology, including competitive
platforms, powertrain, and vehicles to
be produced at New Chrysler’s
manufacturing sites. The transaction is
also expected to allow Fiat and New
Chrysler to each take advantage of the
other’s distribution networks in key
growth markets and to optimize fully
their respective manufacturing footprint
and global supplier base.
Pursuant to the Plan of
Reorganization, New Chrysler, a
Delaware limited liability company, was
formed by Fiat North America, LLC, as
an alliance entity 7 for the acquisition of
the assets from Chrysler LLC generally
free and clear of claims of Chrysler
LLC’s creditors.8 Upon the closing of the
sale, the government entities will hold
12.31% (The U.S. Treasury will hold
9.85% and the Canadian Government
will hold 2.46%), the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan will hold 67.69%, and Fiat
will hold 20% of the total value of
shares (the Shares). Upon reaching
certain milestones, fully explained later
in this exemption, Fiat’s interest will
increase to 35%, with the right to
acquire an additional 16% by buying
certain shares of New Chrysler. Fiat will
not be able to get control of New
Chrysler until the outstanding debts to
6 In connection with the Bankruptcy Proceeding,
Chrysler LLC’s non-U.S. direct and indirect
subsidiaries have not sought relief under chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code or any other insolvency
laws. Chrysler LLC’s Mexican, Canadian and other
international operations are also not part of any
bankruptcy filing.
7 None of the debtor’s equity holders received an
interest in New Chrysler.
8 See In Re Chrysler LLC, et. al., Case No. 09B
50002 (Document 3073), slip op.(Bankr.S.D.N.Y.
May 31, 2009)), the order authorizing the sale of
substantially all of the debtor’s assets free and clear
of all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
the U.S. Treasury and Canada are paid
in full. After the Sale, New Chrysler
became the new legal entity, Chrysler
Group LLC. The claims of Chrysler
LLC’s unsecured creditors were not
assumed by New Chrysler through the
Bankruptcy Proceeding unless expressly
provided for in the MTA. Among the
claims that were not assumed by New
Chrysler, was the obligation owed by
Chrysler LLC to provide retiree medical
benefits pursuant to the Memorandum
of Understanding Post-Retirement
Medical Care, dated October 12, 2007,
between Chrysler and the UAW and the
Memorandum of Understanding PostRetirement Medical Care, dated April
29, 2009, between Chrysler and the
UAW (together, the ‘‘MOUs’’), as well as
the English Settlement Agreement
reached in UAW v. Chrysler, LLC, Civ.
Act. No. 2:07–cv–14310 (E.D. Mich.
complaint filed October 11, 2007).
New Chrysler represents that the
Bankruptcy Proceeding and related Sale
are critical to the survival of the
business previously conducted by
Chrysler LLC. New Chrysler’s
emergence from bankruptcy was
dependent on the achievement of a
number of interrelated agreements
among its creditors, lenders, interested
government agencies, and unionized
employees. To avoid the devastation to
the global economy that would be
caused if Chrysler’s business were to
fail, the governments of the United
States, Canada, and the Province of
Ontario have offered to fund a new
venture, New Chrysler, that will
combine substantially all of Chrysler
LLC’s core operating assets with
advanced automotive technology,
distribution, procurement capabilities,
and management services of Fiat or its
subsidiaries to create an ongoing viable
automobile company. Under these
extraordinary and urgent circumstances,
the governments are prepared to
subsidize the restructured New Chrysler
to ensure that a viable automobile
manufacturing industry remains in
North America. Knowing how quickly
New Chrysler’s prospects could
deteriorate, however, the governments
have placed stringent conditions on
their commitment. Those stringent
conditions include the conditions
related to the exemption transaction,
which is an integral component of that
larger picture.
The UAW asserted during the
Bankruptcy Proceeding, and New
Chrysler denied, that New Chrysler was
bound by the MOUs as a successor to
Chrysler LLC and that it was, therefore,
responsible for providing the retiree
medical benefits contemplated. After
due consideration of the factual and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
legal arguments regarding this issue, as
well as the costs, risks, and delays
associated with litigating the issue, New
Chrysler and the UAW agreed to enter
into a settlement agreement, that was
presented to the Bankruptcy Court for
approval after notice was provided to
affected parties. Ultimately, the
Modified Settlement Agreement was
approved by the Bankruptcy Court and
the initial steps towards implementing
the transactions that are at the heart of
this application began to occur as
contemplated in that agreement.
After several months of arms length
negotiations, the UAW has asserted that,
after due consideration of the issues
involved and seeking to avoid
protracted litigation on the matter, it
entered into a Modified Settlement
Agreement with New Chrysler under
which New Chrysler agreed to provide
retiree medical benefits to a defined
group of current UAW retirees who
were formerly employed by Chrysler
LLC as well as a defined group of
current active employees (once retired)
of New Chrysler who are covered under
a collective bargaining agreement
between New Chrysler and the UAW
(collectively, the ‘‘Covered Group’’). The
medical benefit coverage for New
Chrysler active employees prior to their
retirement is not within the scope of
this Modified Settlement Agreement
and shall continue to be provided in
accordance with the terms of the
applicable collective bargaining
agreement and health care benefit plan.
The Modified Settlement Agreement
is another part of the complete and
integrated arm’s-length transactions
involving multiple parties, including
New Chrysler, Fiat, the Treasury
Department, the Canadian Government,
and the UAW. Throughout the 2009
negotiations over the terms of the
Settlement Agreement, the parties
engaged in extended discussions
concerning the impact of rising health
care costs on New Chrysler’s financial
viability. In this regard, the UAW has
completed its due diligence utilizing
professional financial and legal advisors
with respect to the Modified Settlement
Agreement and determined that it is
fair, reasonable and in the best interest
of the Covered Group.
On June 10, 2009, 41 days after filing
for bankruptcy protection, the sale of
most of Chrysler LLC’s assets to New
Chrysler was completed. As discussed
in more detail below, Fiat will initially
own a minority 20% stake of New
Chrysler with the option of taking
additional equity up to a 35% stake if
certain operational and capitalization
goals are achieved.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51185
Ownership of New Chrysler
Following the bankruptcy proceeding
and the sale of the assets from Chrysler
LLC to New Chrysler, initial ownership
of New Chrysler will be broken into two
classes of membership interests, Class A
(800,000 interests) and Class B (200,000
interests). Fiat will initially own the
200,000 Class B membership interests,
representing 20% of the voting and
economic interest of New Chrysler; the
United States Treasury Department will
own 98,461 Class A membership
interests; the Canadian Government will
together own 24,615 Class A
membership interests, and the VEBA
Trust will own 676,924 Class A
membership interests (the Class A
membership interests initially owned by
the Trust are referred to herein as the
‘‘Shares’’), in each case, subject to the
applicable terms and conditions
described below.
Initially, the Class A and Class B
membership interests generally are
identical except that the Class B
membership interests may ultimately
represent a greater percentage of the
outstanding equity interest in New
Chrysler upon the occurrence of certain
Class B events (discussed below). Fiat
has several other options to acquire
additional Class A membership interests
(also discussed below) except that, until
the U.S. Treasury loan and the Canadian
loan to New Chrysler have been repaid
in full, Fiat may not acquire additional
membership interests if such exercise or
acquisition would cause the total
interest held by Fiat and its affiliates to
exceed 49.9 percent. At a future date,
the earlier of January 1, 2013, or the date
of any New Chrysler Initial Public
Offering (IPO), each outstanding Class B
membership interest will be
automatically converted to Class A
membership interests, thereby reducing
the Class B membership to zero.
Pursuant to the New Chrysler
Operating Agreement (the Operating
Agreement), beginning on June 10, 2009,
and ending on December 31, 2012, the
occurrence of three events (the ‘‘Class B
events’’) would cause the value of Class
B membership interests held by Fiat to
increase by 5% for each event, thereby
increasing Fiat’s interest up to a
maximum of 15% for all three events,
without any new issuance of shares. The
Class B events are as follows:
(1) If New Chrysler receives
government approvals for the
production of an engine based on the
Fiat’s fully integrated robotized engine
family to be manufactured in the U.S.
and delivers a commitment to begin
commercial production of the engine as
soon as commercially practicable;
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
51186
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
(2) if New Chrysler records
cumulative revenues reported in the
quarterly financial statements in an
amount specified in the New Chrysler
Operating Agreement attributable to the
company’s sales made outside of the
NAFTA Countries following the date of
the Operating Agreement and if New
Chrysler executes one or more franchise
agreements covering in the aggregate at
least 90% of the total Fiat group
automobile dealers in Latin America
pursuant to which such dealers will
carry New Chrysler products;
(3) if New Chrysler receives ecological
event governmental approvals for a car
based on Fiat platform technology that
has fuel efficiency measured by miles
per gallon of at least 40 combined miles
per gallon fuel economy and delivers a
commitment to begin assembly in
commercial quantities in a production
facility located in the U.S. as soon as
commercially practicable.
According to the terms of the
Operating Agreement, in the event that
Fiat determines that a Class B event has
occurred prior to January 1, 2013, it
must submit written notice to New
Chrysler. After supplying written notice,
such event shall be deemed to have
irrevocably occurred unless the
company supplies written notice of
objection. If an objection is raised, then
New Chrysler and Fiat will attempt in
good faith to resolve the dispute. If no
agreement is reached, then the parties
will enter into binding arbitration.
Accordingly, the 200,000 Class B
membership interests held by Fiat will
increase to thirty-five percent (35%) of
the voting and economic interest of New
Chrysler and the 800,000 Class A
membership interests held by the
Treasury Department, the Canadian
Government and the VEBA Trust will be
diluted to sixty-five percent (65%) of
the voting and economic interest of New
Chrysler.
On the earlier of January 1, 2013 or
any New Chrysler IPO, each outstanding
Class B membership interest will be
exchanged for Class A membership
interests in an amount such that the
proportional interest of Fiat in New
Chrysler is unchanged.
Alternative and Incremental Call
Options
If one or more of the Class B events
does not occur prior to January 1, 2013,
Fiat will have the option beginning on
January 1, 2013 and ending on June 30,
2016, to purchase from New Chrysler
5% of the Class A membership interests
for each Class B event that has not
occurred (the Alternative Call Option).
The price will be calculated pursuant to
a formula, the use of which depends
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
upon whether or not New Chrysler has
completed an IPO before Fiat exercises
any call options, and which has been
designed to approximate the fair market
value of the interests at the time of
exercise. Fiat additionally has the
option to purchase from the Company
Class A membership interests in an
aggregate amount of up to 16% of the
outstanding membership interests (the
‘‘Incremental Call Option’’). The time
frame for Fiat to exercise this option is
the same as for the Alternative Call
Option (January 1, 2013 through June
30, 2016).
Call Option Agreement
Initially, New Chrysler will not be
publicly traded, though there are
mechanisms for the VEBA Trust to sell
the Shares under certain conditions to
other parties prior to New Chrysler
becoming a publicly traded company.
The VEBA Trust, Fiat, the Treasury
Department and the Canadian
Government agreed to provide Fiat with
additional incentives to encourage Fiat
to take action that will increase the
aggregate value of the parties’
investment in New Chrysler. Thus, in
accordance with the Call Option
Agreement, between July 1, 2012 and
June 1, 2016, Fiat has the option to
purchase from the VEBA Trust up to
40% of the VEBA Trust’s equity
interests in New Chrysler. These
interests consist of the 676,924 Class A
membership interests issued to the
VEBA Trust by New Chrysler on
closing, less any interests that the VEBA
Trust has already disposed of under the
Equity Recapture Agreement (as more
fully discussed below) at the time of
exercise. Fiat may purchase no more
than 20% of such interests within any
six-month period. Fiat’s ability to
exercise its rights under the Call Option
Agreement is limited by the requirement
that, until New Chrysler has repaid its
loan from the United States Treasury
and the Canadian Government in full,
Fiat may not own more than 49.9% of
the outstanding equity interests in New
Chrysler.
The exercise price will be determined
pursuant to a formula which is designed
to arrive at the fair market value of the
interests. The exercise price may be
adjusted if, upon exercise, the VEBA
Trust elects to transfer to Fiat interests
in one or more entities through which,
for tax and administrative purposes, the
VEBA Trust holds membership interests
(each such entity, a ‘‘VEBA HoldCo’’).9
9 VEBA Holdco means one or more Delaware
limited liability companies and/or corporations to
which the VEBA Trust transferred all or part of the
Membership Interests issued to the VEBA Trust
pursuant to the Equity Subscription Agreement.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Transfer of VEBA HoldCo interests,
rather than direct transfer of
membership interests, would prevent
Fiat from obtaining a step-up in tax
basis. Thus, Fiat might be required to
recognize additional gain upon a
subsequent disposition, beyond any
gain attributable to the period in which
Fiat owns the membership interests.
The Call Option Agreement provides for
a reduction in price to compensate for
this increased tax liability, offset by any
positive tax attributes for Fiat (e.g., net
operating losses) caused by receiving
interests in the VEBA HoldCo rather
than membership interests directly. If
Fiat, the VEBA, and the United States
Treasury cannot agree on the amount of
such an adjustment, each has a right to
appoint an arbitrator to a panel of three
arbitrators who will determine the
amount of the adjustment.
First Offer Right and Equity Recapture
Agreement
In addition to the Call Options, Fiat
will have the first right to purchase all
or a part of the Shares (the ‘‘First Offer
Right’’) if a third party has offered to
purchase some or all of the Shares
beginning two (2) years after the Closing
Date as defined in the New Chrysler
Operating Agreement. When the
Committee receives the proposed Sale
offer after the start of the First Offer
Right period, the Committee must issue
written notice to Fiat, the Treasury
Department, the Canadian Government,
and New Chrysler stating its intention to
sell some or all of the Shares, the
number of such Shares, the price and
terms the Committee proposes to be
paid for such Shares, and other material
terms of the proposed Sale (the ‘‘First
Notice’’). For thirty (30) days after the
issuance of the First Notice, Fiat will
have the irrevocable non-transferable
First Offer Right to purchase all or a
portion of the Shares subject to the
proposed Sale, at the price and under
the terms and conditions of such
proposed Sale.
Also under the New Chrysler
Operating Agreement, at any time prior
to an initial public offering of New
Chrysler, holders of 75% of outstanding
membership interests in New Chrysler
may decide to transfer a majority of
membership interests to a third party. In
that event, those holders may also
require all holders of membership
interests to transfer their interests on the
same terms and for the same
consideration (the ‘‘Drag-Along Right’’).
The VEBA Trust may elect to transfer
membership interests directly or to
transfer interests in one or more VEBA
Holdcos; if the VEBA Trust transfers
interests in VEBA Holdcos, then
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
consideration paid the VEBA Trust
pursuant to such a transaction would be
adjusted for the same equitable taxrelated factors described above under
the Call Option Agreement. On behalf of
the VEBA Trust, the Independent
Fiduciary would negotiate in good faith
with the New Chrysler Board of
Directors (the ‘‘Board’’) over the amount
of any adjustment in price resulting
from the transfer of interests in a VEBA
HoldCo. If the Board and the
Independent Fiduciary could not come
to an agreed-upon resolution, the
Independent Fiduciary would appoint
one of the three members of a board of
arbitrators who would determine the
amount of the adjustment. The second
arbitrator would be appointed by the
Board, and the third would be agreed
upon by the Board and the Independent
Fiduciary, or, failing such agreement,
appointed by the administering
authority for the American Arbitration
Association.
In addition to the above-described
agreements, and as a condition to the
Treasury Department’s agreement to
provide financing for New Chrysler, the
VEBA Trust has entered into a separate
agreement with the Treasury
Department referred to as an Equity
Recapture Agreement. Under the terms
of the Equity Recapture Agreement, if
the VEBA realizes from the sale of the
Shares a total value of more than the
threshold amount of $4.25 billion,
increased at nine percent (9%) per
annum starting on January 1, 2010 (the
‘‘Threshold Amount’’), the VEBA agrees
to pay to the Treasury Department the
proceeds received in excess of the
Threshold Amount plus any remaining
Shares still held by the VEBA (the
‘‘Contingent Value Right’’). The nine
percent (9%) per annum cap on the
increase is derived from actuarial
assumptions that were used to
determine the amount of appreciation
required to provide the anticipated
benefits under the Plan. In addition, the
Treasury Department has the right, at
any time, to purchase all outstanding
Shares held by the VEBA Trust for an
amount equal to the Threshold Amount
less the amount of any proceeds already
received by the VEBA Trust in respect
of any of the Shares. This right expires
upon the earlier of its exercise and the
VEBA Trust’s surrender of all remaining
New Chrysler interests held by the
VEBA Trust to the Treasury Department.
If on December 31, 2014, December
31, 2016, or December 31, 2018, the
VEBA Trust’s Shares are not equal to the
value of the Threshold Amount, and the
VEBA Trust or a VEBA Trust-controlled
affiliate continues to hold Shares, the
VEBA Trust is obligated under the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Equity Recapture Agreement to transfer
a portion of such Shares to the Treasury
Department. The value of the transferred
Shares will equal a set percentage of the
Black Scholes value of the Treasury
Department’s Contingent Value Right.
The applicable percentages of the value
of the Contingent Value Right to be
transferred on each of December 31,
2014, December 31, 2016, and December
31, 2018, are 33%, 50%, and 100%,
respectively. The amounts transferred
on prior Interim Settlement Dates are
subtracted from the amount to be
transferred on each Interim Settlement
Date.
The Black Scholes value of the
Contingent Value Right will be
determined using the following
assumptions: (1) A Share price based on
the average over the prior 60 days of
trading; (2) a time to maturity equal to
ten years, seven years, or five years, on
December 31, 2014, December 31, 2016,
and December 31, 2018, respectively; (3)
an exercise price based on an implied
future stock price equivalent to the
Threshold Amount on the applicable
maturity date; and (4) a risk free interest
rate equal to the rate for a U.S. Treasury
Note for a term equal to the assumed
time to maturity.
If New Chrysler stock is not publicly
traded on an Interim Settlement Date,
the U.S. Treasury and the VEBA will
each appoint an independent nationally
recognized investment bank to conduct
a separate appraisal of the value of the
Contingent Value Right. If the separate
appraisals yield values within 10% of
each other, those values will be
averaged. If the separate appraisals are
more than 10% apart, the VEBA and the
U.S. Treasury will appoint a third
independent appraiser, whose
determination will be averaged with the
determination closest to that of the third
independent appraiser.
Establishment of the New VEBA Plan
and Trust
The Modified Settlement Agreement
provides that, upon the
‘‘Implementation Date’’, the retiree
medical benefit obligations to the
‘‘Covered Group’’ will become fixed and
such obligations will be transferred to
the New Chrysler VEBA Plan and the
VEBA Trust, which has been established
to fund benefits under the Plan. The
New Chrysler VEBA Plan and the VEBA
Trust shall, as of the Implementation
Date, be the employee welfare benefit
plan and trust that are exclusively
responsible for all retiree medical
benefits with respect to the Class and
the Covered Group. The UAW Chrysler
Retirees Employees Beneficiary
Association, an employee organization
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51187
within the meaning of section 3(4) of
ERISA (‘‘Chrysler Retiree EBA’’), acting
through the Committee, will establish
and maintain the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan, subject to ERISA, to provide
retiree health benefits to the Class and
Covered Group after the Implementation
Date, which will be December 31, 2009.
Prior to the Section 363 Sale, the Old
Chrysler Plan provided retiree health
benefits to the Class and the Covered
Group; following the closing of the
Section 363 Sale, the New Chrysler Plan
(‘‘New Chrysler VEBA Plan’’) assumed
responsibility for the provision of the
benefits with respect to claims incurred
on or before the Implementation Date.
The New Chrysler VEBA Plan will be
responsible for benefit claims incurred
after the Implementation Date. It is
anticipated that there will be
approximately 120,000 participants and
beneficiaries of the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan beginning on January 1, 2010.
After the Implementation Date, the
Committee will have sole responsibility
to determine the scope and level of
retiree health benefits available to the
Class and Covered Group under the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan. The
Committee may raise or lower the level
of retiree health care benefits available
to the Class and Covered Group. In
exercising its authority over benefit
design, the Committee shall be guided
by the principle that the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan should provide substantial
health benefits for the duration of the
lives of all participants and beneficiaries
in the Plan.
The UAW Chrysler Retirees EBA
along with the UAW General Motors
Company Retirees EBA and the UAW
Ford Retirees EBA, each acting through
the Committee, established the VEBA
Trust on October 16, 2008. The VEBA
Trust will be the funding source for the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan. The VEBA
Trust is the subject of a trust agreement
between the trustee and the Committee,
acting on behalf of the respective EBAs.
The VEBA Trust is intended to be taxexempt under section 501(c)(9) of the
Internal Revenue Code, as amended,
and, as a trust holding assets of plans
subject to ERISA, will itself be subject
to ERISA’s fiduciary responsibility
standards.
The VEBA Trust will have three
separate retiree accounts, designed to
segregate payments attributable to
General Motors (GM), Ford, and
Chrysler, pursuant to the terms of each
company’s settlement agreement with
the UAW and each respective class.
Each retiree account will be a separate,
dedicated account, to be used for the
sole purpose of funding benefits
provided under the separate plans,
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
51188
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
providing health benefits to the retirees
of GM, Ford and Chrysler, and defraying
the reasonable expenses of each plan.
Each retiree account will contain a
separate sub-account maintained to hold
any employer security. Assets from one
retiree account may not offset the
liabilities or defray the expenses
attributable to another retiree account.
The VEBA Trust was structured in this
way to allow for the pooled investment
of assets and to provide economies of
scale to the respective plans’
investments, while maintaining a
separate plan for each three retiree
classes. Unless the Committee decides
to establish segregated investment
vehicles for specific separate retiree
accounts, the assets of the separate
retiree accounts, other than any
employer security sub-account, will be
invested on a pooled basis within the
VEBA Trust (provided that the interest
of each account remains separately
accounted for).
The Modified Settlement Agreement
itself contemplates three separate and
distinct funding sources for the VEBA
Trust: (1) Assets held under a preexisting internal Chrysler VEBA (the
‘‘Preexisting Internal VEBA’’) that are
attributable to the UAW retirees covered
under the Modified Settlement
Agreement—such assets were valued at
$1,589,500,000 as of March 31, 2009,
and those assets, plus the earnings
thereon, are expected to be contributed
to the VEBA Trust on or about January
1, 2010; (2) the Shares, which will
represent sixty-seven and sixty-nine
one-hundredths percent (67.69%) of the
fully diluted ownership of New Chrysler
as of the consummation of the Sale; and
(3) a note issued by New Chrysler with
a principal amount of $4,587,000,000
and an implicit interest rate of nine
percent (9%) (the ‘‘Note’’) payable in
fixed annual installments pursuant to
the following schedule:
(i) Payment of $315 million on July 15,
2010
(ii) Payment of $300 million on July 15,
2011
(iii) Payment of $400 million on July 15,
2012
(iv) Payment of $600 million on July 15,
2013
(v) Payment of $650 million on July 15,
2014
(vi) Payment of $650 million on July 15,
2015
(vii) Payment of $650 million on July
15, 2016
(viii) Payment of $650 million on July
15, 2017
(ix) Payment of $823.8 million on July
15, 2018
(x) Payment of $823.8 million on July
15, 2019
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
(xi) Payment of $823.8 million on July
15, 2020
(xii) Payment of $823.8 million on July
15, 2021
(xiii) Payment of $823.8 million on July
15, 2022
(xiv) Final Payment of $827.1 million on
July 15, 2023
The Shares and the Note were
contributed to the VEBA Trust on the
closing date of the Sale, which was June
10, 2009.
The Trustee, State Street Bank and
Trust Company, shall hold the assets
and income of the Trust in accordance
with the terms of the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan. According to the applicant,
the Trustee has no discretionary
authority with respect to the investment
of assets held in the VEBA Trust, and
must exercise its power in accordance
with the instructions of the Independent
Fiduciary with respect to any employer
security, and in all other cases the
instructions of the Committee or any
investment manager that may be
appointed by the Committee.10 Subject
to the direction of the Independent
Fiduciary with respect to any employer
security, the Trustee shall make
payments from the VEBA Trust Fund to
pay benefits under the Plans as directed
by the Committee or its designee.
According to the terms of the Trust
agreement, the Trustee may be removed
by the Committee at any time upon
thirty (30) days’ advance written notice.
The Committee
The Committee will serve as Plan
Administrator and will be a named
fiduciary of the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan. The Committee will determine the
benefits to be provided under the Plan,
including, without limitation, which
participants will receive benefits, in
what form, and in what amount, and the
contributions that the participants will
be required to make to help defray the
cost of their coverage. The Committee,
acting on behalf of the EBAs, shall be
responsible for the implementation,
amendment and overall operation of the
VEBA Trust and the establishment,
amendment, maintenance, and
administration of the Plans (i.e.,
Chrysler, Ford and GM). Subject to the
provisions of the VEBA Trust and
applicable laws, the Committee shall
have sole, absolute and discretionary
authority to adopt such rules and
provisions and take all actions that it
10 Under ERISA section 403(a)(1), a plan may
expressly provide that a trustee is subject to the
direction of a named fiduciary who is not a trustee,
in which case the trustee shall be subject to proper
directions of such fiduciary which are made in
accordance with the terms of the plan and which
are not contrary to the Act. 29 U.S.C. 1103(a)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
deems desirable for the administration
of the VEBA Trust, and to interpret the
terms of the Plans and VEBA Trust. The
Committee shall be guided by the
principle that the Plans should provide
substantial health benefits for the
duration of the lives of all participants
and beneficiaries.
The Committee consists of eleven (11)
individuals, five (5) appointed by the
UAW and six (6) who are Independent
Members. Independent Member terms
shall be for three (3)-year periods,
except the initial terms of four (4) of the
six (6) original Independent Members,
two (2) of whom shall have an initial
term of two (2) years, and two of whom
shall have an initial term of one (1) year.
An Independent Member may serve
more than one term. Neither Chrysler
LLC nor New Chrysler has any
appointment power, and the Committee
will function independently of both.
The initial Independent Members were
approved by the district court in the
English case. No member of the
Committee may be a current or former
officer, director or employee of Old GM
(i.e., prior to bankruptcy), New GM,
Ford, Chrysler LLC or New Chrysler,
except that a retiree who was
represented by the UAW in his or her
employment with either Old GM, New
GM, Ford, Chrysler LLC, or New
Chrysler or an employee of any such
company who is on leave from the
company and is represented by the
UAW, may be a UAW Member. None of
the Independent Members nor any of
their family members, employers or
partners may have any financial or
institutional relationship with either
Old GM, New GM, Ford, Chrysler LLC,
or New Chrysler if such relationship
could reasonably be expected to impair
such Independent Member’s exercise of
independent judgment.
An Independent Member may be
removed or replaced, and a successor
designated, at any time by an affirmative
vote of nine (9) of the other members of
the Committee. In the event of a vacancy
of an Independent Member position,
whether by expiration of a term,
resignation, removal, incapacity, or
death of an Independent Member, a
successor Independent Member shall be
elected by the affirmative vote of nine
(9) Members, and when possible, such
successor Independent Member shall be
elected prior to the expiration of the
term, resignation, removal, incapacity,
or death of the Independent Member
being replaced. The UAW Members
shall serve at the discretion of the UAW
International President, and may be
removed or replaced, and a successor
designated, at any time by written
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
notice from the UAW International
President to the Committee.
A majority of the Members of the
Committee then in office shall
constitute a quorum for the purpose of
transacting any business; provided that
at least one Independent Member and
one UAW Member are present. Each
Member of the Committee present at the
meeting shall have one vote. All actions
of the Committee shall be by majority
vote of the entire Committee, provided
that at least one Independent Member
and one Union Member must be a
Member in the majority for any
Committee action to take effect.
Independent Fiduciary
Pursuant to the Trust Agreement of
the VEBA Trust, the Committee, in its
sole discretion, will appoint an
Independent Fiduciary to manage the
Employer Security Sub-Account
following the consummation of the
Section 363 Sale.11 The Independent
Fiduciary shall be a bank, trust
company or registered investment
adviser under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940, as amended. The
Independent Fiduciary will be a
‘‘named fiduciary’’ and ‘‘investment
manager’’ as defined in ERISA and shall
act on behalf of the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan and VEBA Trust in connection
with the discretionary management and
disposition (but not the acquisition) of
all employer securities contributed to
the VEBA Trust by New Chrysler
including, as currently relevant, the
Notes and the Shares (including
valuation of the Shares), the Call Option
and any other employer securities held
by the VEBA Trust. The exercise of any
discretionary rights appurtenant to the
Shares, the Note, or the Call Options
(excluding the VEBA Trust’s acceptance
of the contribution of such Shares, and
Note) shall be directed by the
Independent Fiduciary. In effect, the
parties anticipate that the Independent
Fiduciary will ‘‘step into the shoes’’ of
the VEBA Trust in connection with the
Trust’s exercise of its rights and
responsibilities as owner of the Notes
and the Shares, with the sole exception
of the Trust’s right to appoint (with the
approval of the UAW) a director to the
New Chrysler Board.12 The appointment
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
11 The
sub-account is maintained by the Trustee
within each Separate Retiree Account to hold
separately any Employer Security and any proceeds
from the disposition of any Employer Security.
12 Generally, the Committee will remain
responsible for corporate and tax matters relating to
the creation and maintenance (e.g., corporate and
tax filings and elections, annual reports, etc.) of one
or more ‘‘passive,’’ wholly owned title-holding
LLCs that will actually take legal title to the New
Chrysler interests on behalf of the VEBA. These
holding entities are contemplated in the various
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
of the Independent Fiduciary to perform
these functions is a contractual
obligation of the VEBA Trust. In
addition, the Committee believes it is
appropriate and desirable to appoint an
Independent Fiduciary with specialized
expertise as investment manager for
purposes of the protections afforded by
ERISA section 405(d). Additionally,
under the Shareholder Rights
Agreement, the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan must vote its Membership Interest
in New Chrysler in accordance with the
recommendations of the independent
directors of New Chrysler, in proportion
to those recommendations. Therefore,
the Independent Fiduciary will have no
responsibility for the voting of the
Membership Interests.
The Independent Fiduciary must be
independent of and unrelated to
Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the UAW
and the Committee or their affiliates.
This provision will be violated if (1)
such fiduciary directly or indirectly
controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with Chrysler LLC,
New Chrysler, the UAW, the Committee
or their affiliates, (2) such fiduciary
directly or indirectly receives any
compensation or other consideration
from Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the
UAW or any Committee member in his
or her individual capacity in connection
with any transaction described in this
exemption (except that an independent
fiduciary may receive compensation
from the Committee or the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan for services provided to the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan in connection
with the transactions discussed herein if
the amount or payment of such
compensation is not contingent upon or
in any way affected by the independent
fiduciary’s ultimate decision), and (3)
the annual gross revenue received by
the fiduciary, in any fiscal year, from
Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the UAW
or a member of the Committee in his or
her individual capacity, exceeds 3% of
the fiduciary’s annual gross revenue
from all sources (for federal income tax
purposes) for its prior tax year.13
The Independent Fiduciary may be
removed by the Committee on 30 days
transaction documents, will elect to be taxed as ‘‘C’’
corporations, and will exist primarily for tax
reasons (relating to VEBA tax qualification and
unrelated business income tax considerations).
13 The Department notes that candidates for the
position of Independent Fiduciary to the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan may be affiliated with entities
that provide services to Old GM, New GM, Ford,
Chrysler LLC or New Chrysler or their affiliates. It
is the responsibility of the Committee to determine
whether such affiliations are likely to affect the
judgment of the candidate in performing its services
as Independent Fiduciary.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51189
written notice only for cause.14 The
removal will be effective as specified in
the written notice, provided that the
Independent Fiduciary has been given
notice of the appointment of a successor
independent fiduciary. No successor
will be appointed in the event the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan ceases to hold any
employer security. In the event that the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan subsequently
acquires or holds an employer security
and no appointment of a successor
independent fiduciary has been made,
any court of competent jurisdiction
may, upon application by the retiring
independent fiduciary, appoint a
successor after such notice to the
Committee and the retiring independent
fiduciary.
14 Cause is defined in the Independent Fiduciary
Agreement as: (i) Any disqualifying event described
in ERISA section 411; (ii) determination by any
court, arbitrator or government regulatory body that
the Independent Fiduciary has violated any civil or
criminal law (including, but not limited to,
securities, antitrust or ERISA) in connection with
the performance of its responsibilities to the VEBA
Trust (For purposes of avoidance of doubt in
connection with this and the subsequent
subparagraph, a ‘‘determination’’ shall mean any
written judgment, order or decree; court-approved
settlement; arbitration award; or enforcement action
of a government regulatory body or SRO, in the
form of a written sanction, claim, demand or
opinion, whether or not appealable); (iii)
determination by any court, arbitrator or
government regulatory body that the Independent
Fiduciary has materially breached the terms of its
engagement, whether or not appealable; (iv) any
action by the Independent Fiduciary that results in
imposition of a civil or criminal sanction, any
prohibited transaction excise tax, or any civil
judgment or award of damages, on the VEBA Trust,
the Committee, the trustee, or their respective
employees, officers directors or owners (whether or
not subject to indemnity by the Independent
Fiduciary, an insurer, or any other person); (v)
termination, resignation, or death of the
Independent Fiduciary principal or officer assigned
to serve as the relationship principal with respect
to the VEBA Trust, or the inability of such person
to perform his or her duties for a continuous period
of more than 30 days; (vi) any change of ownership
of the Independent Fiduciary that constitutes an
‘‘assignment’’ of the Independent Fiduciary’s
contract with the VEBA Trust, within the meaning
of the Investment Advisers Act; (vii) failure of the
Independent Fiduciary to qualify as an ‘‘investment
manager’’ within the meaning of ERISA section
3(38); (viii) any change in the clientele, business or
ownership of the Independent Fiduciary that results
in an actual conflict of interest; (ix) failure of the
Independent Fiduciary to take into account the
legitimate needs of the VEBA Trust for liquidity to
pay benefits; (x) violation of any conditions
imposed on the Independent Fiduciary under the
terms of the prohibited transaction exemption
issued by the Department; (xi) any other action or
inaction of the Independent Fiduciary that the
Committee determines to be a material breach of the
Independent Fiduciary’s agreement or any law, or
is likely to result in an irreconcilable conflict; (xii)
any circumstance that leads the Committee to
reasonably conclude that the termination of the
Independent Fiduciary and replacement by a
successor Independent Fiduciary is in the financial
interest of the VEBA Trust, provided that the
Committee documents the reasons for the
termination.
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
51190
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
Following the second anniversary of
the Closing Date, under the New
Chrysler Operating Agreement, the
VEBA Trust and other holders of Shares
may transfer their interests in New
Chrysler to third parties. Under the
Trust Agreement, the Independent
Fiduciary would exercise the VEBA
Trust’s right to make such transfers.
Before transferring New Chrysler
Membership Interests to a third party,
non-Fiat holders must afford Fiat a right
of first offer, and other holders a right
of second offer, whereby Fiat or the
other holders could purchase the
interests to be transferred on the same
terms as the terms offered to the third
party. With respect to employer
securities held by the VEBA Trust, the
Independent Fiduciary would have the
responsibility to afford Fiat the right of
first offer and other holders the right of
second offer according to the terms of
the New Chrysler Operating Agreement.
The rights of the VEBA Trust under
the Shareholders Agreement and the
Registration Rights Agreement are rights
concerning the management and
disposition of employer securities, and
as such, according to the terms of the
VEBA Trust, will be exercised by the
Independent Fiduciary. The
Independent Fiduciary will determine
when and whether to exercise certain
registration rights.
The Committee delegated to a
subcommittee (i.e., three Committee
members) the responsibility to retain an
Independent Fiduciary on behalf of the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan. The
subcommittee initially determined to
proceed with the assumption that the
interests of each plan whose assets are
held by the VEBA Trust would be best
served by seeking to retain a single
qualified Independent Fiduciary to
represent all three plans (providing
health benefits, respectively, to retirees
of Chrysler, GM, and Ford). However,
the subcommittee recognizes the
possibility that engaging multiple
Independent Fiduciaries may turn out to
be the better option.
The subcommittee intends, as part of
the interview process for potential
candidates for the Independent
Fiduciary appointment, to question the
candidates on the nature and likelihood
of potential conflicts of interest, the
appropriate means of monitoring and
communicating actual or potential
conflicts, including whether the
candidates currently have formal
conflict monitoring procedures, and
mechanisms for dealing with actual or
potential conflicts as they are identified.
After reviewing the candidates’
qualifications, capacity to represent all
three plans, willingness to do so, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
other relevant factors, in consultation
with counsel, the subcommittee
anticipates making a final determination
as to whether to hire one Independent
Fiduciary or multiple Independent
Fiduciaries.
The subcommittee will work with the
Independent Fiduciary candidate(s) to
develop procedures to identify,
minimize and address conflicts of
interest as they arise. Specifically, in the
event that a single Independent
Fiduciary is appointed, the
subcommittee will engage a ‘‘conflicts
monitor’’ to (i) develop a process for
identifying potential conflicts, (ii) to
regularly review the Independent
Fiduciary reports, investment banker
reports, and public information
regarding the companies, to identify the
presence of factors that could lead to a
conflict, and (iii) further question the
Independent Fiduciary when
appropriate.
Additionally, the subcommittee will
be prepared to replace the Independent
Fiduciary in the event of an actual and
irreconcilable conflict of interest.
Finally, the subcommittee will require
the Independent Fiduciary to adopt a
written policy regarding conflicts of
interest. Such policy will require that,
as part of the Independent Fiduciary’s
periodic reporting to the Committee, the
Independent Fiduciary includes a
discussion of actual or potential
conflicts identified by the Independent
Fiduciary and options for avoiding or
resolving the conflict.
A separate investment bank will be
retained with respect to each of the
three plans comprising the VEBA Trust.
The investment bank’s initial
recommendations would be made solely
with the goal of maximizing the returns
for the single plan that owns the
securities for which the investment
bank is responsible. If the Independent
Fiduciary deviated from such initial
recommendations, it would find it
necessary to explain why it deviated
from a recommendation; additionally,
such a deviation would be a way for the
Committee or its designee to flag
possible conflicts of interest in advance.
Any contract between the Independent
Fiduciary and an investment banker
will include an acknowledgement by
the investment banker that the
investment banker’s ultimate client is an
ERISA plan.
Board of Directors
In addition to the VEBA Trust’s
ownership interest in New Chrysler, for
so long as the VEBA Trust remains a
member of, and retains at least a fifteen
percent (15%) interest in, New Chrysler,
the VEBA Trust shall have the right
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
exercised by the Committee to designate
one representative to the New Chrysler
Board of Directors (the ‘‘Board’’), subject
to the prior written consent of the UAW.
Pursuant to the New Chrysler Operating
Agreement, the Board will initially
consist of nine (9) members; three (3) of
whom will be appointed by Fiat, three
(3) of whom will be appointed by the
Treasury Department (which three
directors will in turn appoint a fourth
director (the ‘‘Final Director’’)), one (1)
of whom will be appointed by the
Canadian Government, and one (1) of
whom will be appointed by the VEBA
Trust (as described above). In addition,
for so long as the VEBA Trust owns any
membership interests in New Chrysler,
the VEBA Trust has agreed to vote its
membership interests in accordance
with the recommendations of the
independent directors of the Board, in
proportion to such recommendations.
Fiat will have the right to appoint four
(4) directors once it obtains an aggregate
ownership interest of thirty-five percent
(35%) or more in New Chrysler and the
Final Director will resign once Fiat
obtains the right to appoint a fourth
director.
Administrative Exemptive Relief
New Chrysler’s financial
circumstances preclude it from paying
cash to the New Chrysler VEBA Plan. As
explained above, the Bankruptcy
Proceeding and related Sale were vital
for the survival of the business
previously conducted by Chrysler and
this exemption request is critical to the
larger overall transaction. Certain
transactions called for or necessitated by
the Settlement Agreement between New
Chrysler and the New Chrylser VEBA
Plan are prohibited by the restrictions of
406 of ERISA.15 Accordingly, the
Applicant requests an administrative
exemption from the Department with
respect to: (1) The acquisition by the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan of the Shares
and the Note from New Chrysler; (2) the
holding by the New Chrysler VEBA Plan
of the Shares and the Note; (3) the
management of the Shares and Note by
an Independent Fiduciary; and (4) the
asset transfers to and from the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan necessitated by the
transition of benefits payment
responsibility from one plan to another,
or due to mistaken deposits into the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan. The
Applicant explains that the contribution
of the Shares and the Note to the VEBA
15 Unless otherwise indicated, all references
herein to regulations are to regulations found in 29
CFR and all references to statutory sections are to
provisions of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘ERISA’’), as
codified in Title 29 of the United States Code.
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
Trust would violate sections
406(a)(1)(A), (B), and (E), 406(a)(2), and
407(a), and 406(b) of the Act. In
addition, the Applicant requests
exemptive relief from the prohibitions
of sections 406(a)(1)(B) and 406(a)(1)(D)
of ERISA for certain payments and
reimbursements between New Chrysler,
the Existing Internal VEBA, and the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan, and for the
return of mistaken deposits to the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan.
Section 406(a)(1)(E) of the Act
provides that a fiduciary with respect to
a plan shall not cause the plan to engage
in a transaction if he knows or should
know that such transaction constitutes a
direct or indirect acquisition, on behalf
of the plan, of any employer security in
violation of section 407(a). Section
406(a)(2) of the Act prohibits a fiduciary
who has authority or discretionary
control of plan assets to permit the plan
to hold any employer security if he
knows or should know that holding
such security violates section 407(a).
Section 407(a)(1) of the Act states that
a plan may not acquire or hold any
employer security which is not a
qualifying employer security. Section
407(a)(2) of the Act states that a plan
may not acquire any qualifying
employer security (or qualifying
employer real property) if immediately
after such acquisition the aggregate fair
market value of the employer securities
(and employer real property) held by the
plan exceeds 10% of the fair market
value of the assets of the plan. Section
407(d)(5) of the Act defines the term
‘‘qualifying employer security’’ to mean
an employer security which is a stock,
a marketable obligation, or an interest in
certain publicly traded partnerships.
After December 17, 1987, in the case of
a plan, other than an eligible individual
account plan, an employer security will
be considered a qualifying employer
security only if such employer security
satisfies the requirements of section
407(f)(1) of the Act. Section 407(f)(1) of
the Act states that stock satisfies the
requirements of this paragraph if,
immediately following the acquisition
of such stock no more than 25% of the
aggregate amount of stock of the same
class issued and outstanding at the time
of acquisition is held by the plan, and
at least 50% of the aggregate amount of
such stock is held by persons
independent of the issuer.
In this regard, since the New Chrysler
Note and Shares are not qualifying
employer securities within the meaning
of § 407(d)(5) 16 of ERISA, New Chrysler
16 An Employer Security is any obligation, note,
warrant, bond, debenture, stock or other security
within the meaning of section 407(d)(1) of ERISA
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
is applying for a prohibited transaction
exemption to permit the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan to acquire and hold such
New Chrysler Note and Shares.
Similarly, if employer securities and
employer real property would exceed
10% of the total assets in the New VEBA
immediately after transfer of the New
Chrysler Shares and Note to the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan, the applicant
requests an exemption for the
acquisition and holding of such Note
and Shares. Thus, an exemption is
specifically needed because the
transactions that are intended to
adequately fund the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan will result in violations of
sections 406(a)(1)(E), 406(a)(2), 406(b)(1)
and (2) of the Act.
Additionally, the Department has
proposed relief from section
406(a)(1)(A) for the disposition of the
Shares, in the event that the Shares are
sold in a transaction involving a party
in interest. Section 406(a)(1)(A)
prohibits the sale, exchange or leasing of
any property between a plan and a party
in interest.
Benefit Payments and Reimbursements
The Applicant requests exemptive
relief from the prohibitions of sections
406(a)(1)(B) and 406(a)(1)(D) of ERISA
for certain payments and
reimbursements between New Chrysler,
any affiliate of New Chrysler, the
Existing Internal VEBA and the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan.
ERISA section 406(a)(1)(B) prohibits a
fiduciary from causing a plan to engage
in a transaction if he knows or should
know that such transaction constitutes a
direct or indirect lending of money or
other extension of credit between a plan
and a party in interest. ERISA section
406(a)(1)(D) prohibits a fiduciary from
causing a plan to engage in a transaction
if he knows or should know that such
transaction constitutes a direct or
indirect transfer to, or use by or for the
benefit of, a party in interest, of any
assets of the plan.
Prior to the Implementation Date,
New Chrysler will provide benefits to,
among others, individuals who
ultimately will be covered by the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan. The New Chrysler
VEBA Plan will have sole responsibility
and be the exclusive source of funds for
the payment of retiree medical benefits
issued by an employer or an affiliate that is
acquired or held by the VEBA Trust (or arising from
any such security through conversion) pursuant to
a deposit or transfer under one of the Settlements
with Chrysler, GM, and Ford, the acquisition or
holding of which (i) is not prohibited by sections
406(a)(1)(E) or 406(a)(2) of ERISA, or (ii) is the
subject of a prohibited transaction exemption
provided under section 408(a) of ERISA.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51191
to the Class and Covered Group, with
respect to benefit claims incurred on
and after the Implementation Date.
Under certain circumstances
connected to the transition, New
Chrysler, any affiliate of New Chrysler,
the Existing Internal VEBA and the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan may arguably
extend credit or transfer plan assets to
one another in order to pay benefit
claims that are the legal responsibility of
the other party (the ‘‘Responsible
Party’’).17 The Applicant asserts that
mispayments and reimbursements are
likely to occur in the normal course due
to the administrative realities of health
care payments and the shifting of
medical benefit responsibilities between
New Chrysler, any affiliate of New
Chrysler, the Existing Internal VEBA
and the New Chrysler VEBA Plan in a
short period of time.
In the event of a mispayment, the
Responsible Party will reimburse the
payor for such benefits, plus interest.
According to the Applicant, payment by
a payor of benefits for claims incurred
after benefit responsibility has been
transferred arguably is an extension of
credit between the payor and the
responsible party that is prohibited
under section 406(a)(1)(B). Payment by
the Responsible Party to the payor as
reimbursement for these paid claims
arguably is a transfer of plan assets to
a party in interest that is prohibited
under 406(a)(1)(D).
Deposits by Mistake
The Applicant likewise seeks relief
from section 406(a)(1)(D) of ERISA for
return of mistaken deposits to the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan, with interest.
Under the last paragraph of section 9
of the Modified Settlement Agreement,
any deposit made to the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan by mistake will be returned
(with earnings) within 30 days of notice
to the Committee of the mistake, to the
extent permitted by law. The Applicant
is concerned that this could be viewed
as involving a prohibited transfer of
plan assets to a party in interest.
Accordingly, the Applicant requests
exemptive relief for this transaction.
Statutory Findings
The Applicant makes the following
statements regarding the Department’s
required findings under section 408(a)
of ERISA that the exemption is
administratively feasible, in the
interests of the New Chrysler VEBA
17 Under sections 5 and 6 of the Modified
Settlement Agreement, claims incurred before the
Implementation Date will be paid by New Chrysler,
an affiliate of New Chrysler or the Preexisting
Internal VEBA, as applicable, in accordance with
the terms of the New Chrysler VEBA Plan.
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
51192
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
exemption is administratively feasible,
in the interests of the plan and of its
participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemption, if
granted, will be supplemental to, and
not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transitional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemption, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in the
application are true and complete, and
that the application accurately describes
all material terms of the transaction
which is the subject of the exemption.
Notification of Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Plan and of its participants and
beneficiaries, and protective of the
rights of New Chrysler VEBA Plan
participants and beneficiaries.
The exemption transactions are
administratively feasible because they
are relatively simple and straightforward, easy to monitor, and involve
the management of the Securities by the
Independent Fiduciary.
The exemption transactions are in the
interest of the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan’s participants and beneficiaries and
protective of their rights because a
retiree welfare plan with assets
consisting of employer securities is
preferable to a plan that is unfunded or
underfunded. The Independent
Fiduciary will represent the interests of
the participants and beneficiaries of the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan by exercising
the sole discretion regarding the
management and disposition of the New
Chrysler Shares and Note.
Proposed Exemption
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which, among other things,
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be
granted under section 408(a) of the Act
and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code,
the Department must find that the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
Based on the facts and representations
set forth in the application, the
Department is considering granting the
following exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act
and in accordance with the procedures
set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart
B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10,
1990), as follows:
Section I. Covered Transactions
(a) If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A), (B),
and (E), 406(a)(2), 406(b)(1) and (2), and
407(a) of the Act shall not apply,
effective June 10, 2009 to:
(1) The acquisition by the UAW Chrysler
Retiree Medical Benefits Plan (New Chrysler
VEBA Plan) and its associated UAW Retiree
Medical Benefits Trust (the VEBA Trust) of
676,924 New Chrysler Shares (the Shares)
and a note issued by New Chrysler with a
principal amount of $4,587,000,000 and an
implicit interest rate of nine percent (9%)
(the Note) transferred by New Chrysler and
deposited in the Chrysler Employer Security
Sub-Account of the Chrysler Separate Retiree
Account of the VEBA Trust;
(2) The holding of the Shares and the Note
by the New Chrysler VEBA Plan in the
Chrysler Employer Security Sub-Account of
the Chrysler Separate Retiree Account of the
VEBA Trust;
(3) The disposition of the Shares and the
Note;
(4) The sale by the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan to Fiat S.p.A (Fiat) of Shares pursuant
to the exercise by Fiat of the Call Option
Agreement and/or the First Offer Right
described in the New Chrysler Operating
Agreement.
(b) If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(B),
406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1) and 406(b)(2) of
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ERISA shall not apply, effective June 10,
2009, to:
(1) The payment by New Chrysler, the
Existing Internal VEBA, the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan, or any affiliate of New Chrysler
of a benefit claim that was the responsibility
and legal obligation, under the terms of the
applicable plan documents, of one of the
other parties listed in this paragraph; and
(2) The reimbursement by New Chrysler,
the Existing Internal VEBA, the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan, or any affiliate of New Chrysler,
of a benefit claim that was paid by another
party listed in this paragraph, which was not
legally responsible for the payment of such
claim, plus interest.
(c) If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(B),
406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1) and 406(b)(2) of
ERISA shall not apply, effective June 10,
2009, to the return to New Chrysler of
assets deposited or transferred to the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan by mistake,
plus interest.
Section II. Conditions Applicable to
Section I(a)
(a) The Committee appoints a
qualified Independent Fiduciary to act
on behalf of the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan for all purposes related to the
transfer of the Shares and Note to the
Plan for the duration of the Plan’s
holding of the Shares and Note, except
for the voting of the Shares. Such
Independent Fiduciary will have sole
discretionary responsibility relating to
the holding, disposition and ongoing
management of the Shares and the Note.
The Independent Fiduciary will
determine, before taking any of the
actions regarding the Shares and the
Note, that each such action or
transaction is in the interest of the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan.
(b) In the event that the same
Independent Fiduciary is appointed to
represent the interests of one or more of
the other plans comprising the VEBA
Trust (i.e., the UAW General Motors
Retiree Medical Benefits Plan and/or the
UAW Ford Retiree Medical Benefits
Plan) with respect to employer
securities deposited into the Trust, the
Committee takes the following steps to
identify, monitor and address any
conflict of interest that may arise with
respect to the Independent Fiduciary’s
performance of its responsibilities:
(i) The Committee appoints a
‘‘conflicts monitor’’ to: (1) Develop a
process for identifying potential
conflicts; (2) regularly review the
Independent Fiduciary reports,
investment banker reports, and public
information regarding the companies, to
identify the presence of factors that
could lead to a conflict; and (3) further
question the Independent Fiduciary
when appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
(ii) The Committee adopts procedures
to facilitate prompt replacement of the
Independent Fiduciary if the Committee
in its sole discretion determines such
replacement is necessary due to a
conflict of interest.
(iii) The Committee requires the
Independent Fiduciary to adopt a
written policy regarding conflicts of
interest. Such policy shall require that,
as part of the Independent Fiduciary’s
periodic reporting to the Committee, the
Independent Fiduciary includes a
discussion of actual or potential
conflicts identified by the Independent
Fiduciary and options for avoiding or
resolving the conflict.
(c) The Independent Fiduciary
authorizes the Trustee of the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan to dispose of the
Shares and the Note only after the
Independent Fiduciary determines, at
the time of the transaction, that the
transaction is feasible, in the interest of
the New Chrysler VEBA Plan, and
protective of the participants and
beneficiaries of the Plan.
(d) The Independent Fiduciary
negotiates and approves on behalf of the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan any
transactions between the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan and any party in interest
involving the Shares or the Note that
may be necessary in connection with
the subject transactions (including but
not limited to the registration of the
securities contributed to the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan).
(e) Any contract between the
Independent Fiduciary and an
investment banker includes an
acknowledgement by the investment
banker that the investment banker’s
ultimate client is an ERISA plan.
(f) The Independent Fiduciary
discharges its duties consistent with the
terms of the New Chrysler VEBA Plan,
the Trust Agreement, the Independent
Fiduciary Agreement, and any other
documents governing the employer
securities, such as the registration rights
agreement.
(g) The New Chrysler VEBA Plan
incurs no fees, costs or other charges
(other than described in the VEBA Trust
agreement and the Modified Settlement
Agreement) as a result of the
transactions exempted herein.
(h) The terms of any transaction
exempted herein are no less favorable to
the New Chrysler VEBA Plan than the
terms negotiated at arms’ length under
similar circumstances between
unrelated parties.
Section III. Conditions Applicable to
Section I(b)
(a) The Committee and the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan’s third party
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
administrator will review the benefits
paid during the transition period and
determine the dollar amount of
mispayments made, subject to the
review of the VEBA Trust’s independent
auditor. The results of this review will
be made available to New Chrysler.
(b) New Chrysler and their respective
plans’ third party administrator(s) will
review the benefits paid during the
transition period and determine the
dollar amount of mispayments made,
subject to the review of the respective
plans’ independent auditor. The results
of this review will be made available to
the Committee.
(c) Interest on any reimbursed
mispayment will accrue from the date of
the mispayment to the date of the
reimbursement.
(d) Interest will be determined using
the applicable OPEB discount rate.18
(e) If there is a dispute as to the
amount of a reimbursement requested,
the parties will enter into an alternative
dispute resolution procedure as defined
in section VI.(e) of this exemption.
Section IV. Conditions Applicable to
Section I(c)
(a) New Chrysler must make a claim
to the Committee regarding the specific
deposit or transfer made in error or
made in an amount greater than that to
which the New Chrysler VEBA Plan was
entitled.
(b) The claim is made within the
Verification Time Period, as defined in
Section VI(s) of this exemption.
(c) Interest on any mistaken deposit or
transfer will accrue from the date of the
mistaken payment to the date of the
repayment.
(d) Interest will be determined using
the applicable OPEB discount rate.
(e) If there is a dispute as to the
amount of a mistaken payment, the
parties will enter into an alternative
dispute resolution procedure as defined
in section VI.(e) of this exemption.
Section V. Conditions Applicable to
Section I(a), (b), (c)
(a) The Committee and the
Independent Fiduciary maintain for a
period of six (6) years from the date the
Note or any Shares are transferred to the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan the records
necessary to enable the persons
described in paragraph (b) below to
determine whether conditions of this
exemption have been met, except that (i)
18 OPEB means Other Post-Employment Benefits,
and typically includes retiree healthcare benefits,
life insurance, tuition assistance, day care, legal
services and the like. The OPEB discount rate is a
rate used to discount projected future OPEB
benefits payment cash flows to determine the
present value of the OPEB obligation.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51193
a separate prohibited transaction will
not be considered to have occurred if,
due to circumstances beyond the control
of the Committee and/or the
Independent Fiduciary, the records are
lost or destroyed prior to the end of the
six-year period, and (ii) no party in
interest other than the Committee or the
Independent Fiduciary shall be subject
to the civil penalty that may be assessed
under section 502(i) if the records are
not maintained, or are not available for
examination as required by paragraph
(b) below; and
(b)(1) Except as provided in section
(2) of this paragraph and
notwithstanding any provisions of
subsections Section (a)(2) and (b) of
ERISA section 504, the records referred
to in paragraph (a) above shall be
unconditionally available at their
customary location during normal
business hours to:
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department or the
Internal Revenue Service;
(B) the UAW or any duly authorized
representative of the UAW;
(C) New Chrysler or any duly
authorized representative of New
Chrysler; and
(D) Fiat or any duly authorized
representative of Fiat; and
(E) the Independent Fiduciary or any
duly authorized representative of the
Independent Fiduciary;
(F) The Committee or any duly
authorized representative of the
Committee; and
(G) Any participant or beneficiary of
the New Chrysler VEBA Plan, or any
duly authorized representative of such
participant or beneficiary.
Section VI. Definitions
(a) The term ‘‘affiliate’’ means: (1)
Any person directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with such other
person; (2) Any officer, director, or
partner, employee or relative (as defined
in section 3(15) of ERISA) of such other
person; or (3) Any corporation,
partnership or other entity of which
such other person is an officer, director
or partner. (For purposes of this
definition, the term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual.)
(b) The term ‘‘Class’’ or ‘‘Class
Members’’ shall mean all persons who
are: (i) New Chrysler-UAW Represented
Employees who, as of October 29, 2007,
were retired from Chrysler LLC with
eligibility for Retiree Medical Benefits
under the Chrysler Plan, and their
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
51194
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
eligible spouses, surviving spouses and
dependents; (ii) surviving spouses and
dependents of any New Chrysler-UAW
Represented Employees who attained
seniority and died on or prior to October
29, 2007 under circumstances where
such employee’s surviving spouse and/
or dependents are eligible to receive
Retiree Medical Benefits from Chrysler
and/or the Chrysler Plan; (iii) former
New Chrysler-UAW Represented
Employees or UAW-represented
employees who, as of October 29, 2007,
were retired from any previously sold,
closed, divested or spun-off Chrysler
LLC business unit with eligibility to
receive Retiree Medical Benefits from
Chrysler LLC and/or the Chrysler Plan
by virtue of any agreement(s) between
Chrysler LLC and the UAW, and their
eligible spouses, surviving spouses, and
dependents; and (iv) surviving spouses
and dependents of any former Chrysler
LLC–UAW Represented Employee or
UAW-represented employee of a
previously sold, closed, divested or
spun-off Chrysler LLC business unit,
who attained seniority and died on or
prior to October 29, 2007 under
circumstances where such employee’s
surviving spouse and/or dependents are
eligible to receive Retiree Medical
Benefits from Chrysler LLC and/or the
Chrysler Plan.
(c) The term ‘‘Committee’’ shall mean
the eleven individuals consisting of six
independent members and five UAW
appointed members who will serve as
the plan administrator and named
fiduciary of the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan.
(d) The term ‘‘Covered Group’’ shall
mean:
(i) All New Chrysler Active
Employees who had attained seniority
as of September 14, 2007, and who
retire after October 29, 2007 under the
Chrysler LLC–UAW National
Agreements, or any other agreement(s)
between Chrysler LLC and the UAW or
New Chrysler and the UAW, and who
upon retirement are eligible for Retiree
Medical Benefits under the Chrysler
Plan or the New Chrysler VEBA Plan, as
applicable, and their eligible spouses,
surviving spouses and dependents; (ii)
all former New Chrysler-UAW
Represented Employees and all UAWrepresented employees who, as of
October 29, 2007, remained employed
in a previously sold, closed, divested, or
spun-off Chrysler LLC business unit,
and upon retirement are eligible for
Retiree Medical Benefits from Chrysler
LLC and/or the Chrysler Plan or the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan by virtue of
any other agreement(s) between
Chrysler LLC and the UAW or New
Chrysler and the UAW, and their
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
eligible spouses, surviving spouses and
dependents; and (iii) all eligible
surviving spouses and dependents of
New Chrysler Active Employees, or of
former New Chrysler-UAW Represented
Employees or UAW-represented
employees identified in (ii) above, who
attained seniority on or prior to
September 14, 2007 and die after
October 29, 2007 but prior to retirement
under circumstances where such
employee’s surviving spouse and/or
dependents are eligible for Retiree
Medical Benefits from Chrysler LLC
and/or the Chrysler Plan or the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan, as applicable.
(e) The term ‘‘Alternative Dispute
Resolution Procedure’’ shall mean,
notwithstanding anything in Section 23
of the Modified Settlement Agreement
to the contrary, the following process for
the resolution of any dispute or
controversy arising under Section 5 of
the Modified Settlement Agreement for
the reimbursement of benefit claims or
in Section 9 of the Modified Settlement
Agreement for the mistaken deposits.
Such disputes shall be resolved in the
following manner:
(i) While the parties agree that each of
the disputes with respect to mistaken
deposits and reimbursement of benefit
claims referred to in the Settlement
Agreement may be submitted to
arbitration, they first shall endeavor to
resolve the dispute through the
following procedures:
(1) The aggrieved party shall provide
the other party with written notice of
such dispute;
(2) The written notice shall include a
description of the alleged violation and
identify the Section(s) of the Settlement
Agreement allegedly violated;
(3) The party receiving the notice
shall respond in writing within 21
calendar days of receipt of notice; and
(4) Within 21 calendar days of that
response the parties shall meet in an
effort to resolve the dispute.
All the time periods in this definition
may be extended by agreement of the
parties to the particular dispute.
(ii) Should the parties be unable to
resolve the dispute within 30 calendar
days from the date of the meeting set
forth in this definition, either party may
send written demand to the other party
that the issue be resolved by arbitration.
The failure to demand arbitration within
60 calendar days from the date of the
meeting as set forth in this definition
shall waive any right to such arbitration
over the issue, absent mutual written
agreement to the contrary by the parties.
If a party fails to make a timely demand
for arbitration pursuant to this
definition, such party may not pursue
the dispute in court, and the dispute
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will be resolved on the basis of the
position taken by the opposing or
answering party.
(iii) In the event that New Chrysler,
the UAW, or the Committee proceed to
arbitration in accordance with this
definition, that dispute shall be
submitted to an arbitrator (the
‘‘Arbitrator’’) who will not have the
authority to modify or amend the
Modified Settlement Agreement, but
only to apply the Modified Settlement
Agreement, as written, to particular
factual situations based on a
preponderance of the evidence. The
Arbitrator shall not have the authority to
award punitive or exemplary damages.
Interest shall be paid on any delayed
payments as a result of the arbitration
process. The interest will be calculated
daily at a rate equal to the OPEB
Discount Rate for each day that amounts
remain outstanding. Such arbitration
shall take place in Auburn Hills,
Michigan unless otherwise agreed upon
in writing by the parties. Any award
shall be in writing and issued within 30
days from the close of the hearing,
unless the parties otherwise agree. The
award shall be final, conclusive and
binding on New Chrysler, the UAW, and
the Committee. The award may be
reduced to judgment in any appropriate
court having jurisdiction in accordance
with the provisions of the applicable
law.
(iv) In the event that a dispute arising
under this definition is taken to
arbitration, the Arbitrator shall be the
arbitrator/umpire used by New Chrysler
and the UAW for disputes arising under
the then applicable New Chrysler-UAW
National Agreement; provided that, if
within 15 days of receipt of the written
arbitration demand referred to in (ii)
above, the parties agree in writing that
the dispute requires an arbitrator with
actuarial expertise, then the Arbitrator
shall be a person with actuarial
expertise upon whom the parties
mutually agree in writing, but failing
such mutual agreement with 30 days of
receipt of the written arbitration
demand referred to in (ii) above, the
arbitrator/umpire used by New Chrysler
and the UAW for disputes arising under
then applicable New Chrysler-UAW
National Agreement shall select a
person with actuarial expertise to serve
as the Arbitrator.
(v) New Chrysler, the UAW, and the
Committee shall cooperate in setting a
hearing date for the arbitration as soon
as possible following selection of the
Arbitrator.
(f) The term ‘‘Existing Internal VEBA’’
shall mean the Chrysler VEBA Trust
between Chrysler and State Street Bank
and Trust Company, which will be
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 191 / Monday, October 5, 2009 / Notices
maintained by New Chrysler from June
10, 2009.
(g) The term ‘‘Independent Fiduciary’’
means a fiduciary that is (i) independent
of and unrelated to Chrysler LLC, New
Chrysler, the UAW, the Committee, and
their affiliates, and (ii) appointed to act
on behalf of the New Chrysler VEBA
Plan with respect to the holding,
management and disposition of the
Shares and the Note. In this regard, the
fiduciary will not be deemed to be
independent of and unrelated to
Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the UAW,
the Committee, and their affiliates if (1)
such fiduciary directly or indirectly
controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with Chrysler LLC,
New Chrysler, the UAW, the Committee
or their affiliates, (2) such fiduciary
directly or indirectly receives any
compensation or other consideration
from Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the
UAW or any Committee member in his
or her individual capacity in connection
with any transaction contemplated in
this exemption (except that an
independent fiduciary may receive
compensation from the Committee or
the New Chrysler VEBA Plan for
services provided to the New Chrysler
VEBA Plan in connection with the
transactions discussed herein if the
amount or payment of such
compensation is not contingent upon or
in any way affected by the independent
fiduciary’s ultimate decision), and (3)
the annual gross revenue received by
the fiduciary, in any fiscal year, from
Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the UAW
or a member of the Committee in his or
her individual capacity, exceeds 3% of
the fiduciary’s annual gross revenue
from all sources (for federal income tax
purposes) for its prior tax year.
(h) The term ‘‘Implementation Date’’
shall mean the later of January 1, 2010
or (ii) the ‘‘Final Effective Date,’’ as
defined in the Modified Settlement
Agreement.
(i) The term ‘‘New Chrysler’’ shall
mean a Delaware Limited Liability
Company formed by Fiat North America
LLC, a subsidiary of Fiat S.p.A., a
manufacturer of automobiles and
automotive parts in Turin, Italy. New
Chrysler is the company that acquired
certain assets and liabilities from
Chrysler LLC pursuant to the Section
363 Sale.
(j) The term ‘‘Note’’ shall mean a note
issued by New Chrysler with a principal
amount of $4,587 billion and an implicit
interest rate of nine (9%) payable in
fixed annual installments pursuant to
the Indenture Agreement. Payments,
consisting of accrued and unpaid
interest and amortized principal shall be
due on July 15 of each year,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Oct 02, 2009
Jkt 220001
commencing July 15, 2010 and ending
on July 15, 2023.
(k) The term ‘‘Shares’’ means the
membership interests issued by New
Chrysler.
(l) The term ‘‘New Chrysler VEBA
Plan’’ refers to the newly created retiree
medical employee welfare benefit plan.
The plan is an employee welfare benefit
plan established and maintained by the
Committee, and shall provide retiree
medical benefits to the Class and the
Covered Group established pursuant to
the Modified Settlement Agreement.
(m) The term ‘‘Registration Rights
Agreement’’ means the Equity
Registration Rights Agreement by and
among New Chrysler, the U.S. Treasury,
Canada, the VEBA Trust and Chrysler
LLC, entered into on June 10, 2009.
(n) The term ‘‘Section 363 Sale’’
means a sale under section 363 of Title
11 of the U.S. Code, by which on June
10, 2009, New Chrysler succeeded to
certain assets and liabilities of Chrysler
LLC.
(o) The term ‘‘Modified Settlement
Agreement’’ means the UAW Retiree
Settlement Agreement between New
Chrysler and the UAW dated June 10,
2009.
(p) The term ‘‘Treasury Department’’
shall mean the United States
Department of the Treasury.
(q) The term ‘‘VEBA’’ means the UAW
Chrysler Retiree Medical Benefits Plan
(the New Chrysler VEBA Plan) and its
associated UAW Retiree Medical
Benefits Trust (the VEBA Trust).
(r) The term ‘‘UAW’’ means the
International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural
Implement Workers of America.
(s) The term ‘‘Verification Time
Period’’ means: (i) With respect to all
Shares, the period beginning on the date
of publication of the final exemption in
the Federal Register and ending 60
calendar days thereafter; (ii) with
respect to each payment pursuant to the
Note, the period beginning on the date
of the payment and ending 90 calendar
days thereafter; and (iii) with respect to
the UAW-Related Account of the
Existing Internal VEBA, the period
beginning on the date of publication of
the final exemption in the Federal
Register (or, if later, the date of the
transfer of the UAW-Related Account to
the New Chrysler VEBA Plan) and
ending 180 calendar days thereafter.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of
September 2009.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E9–23849 Filed 10–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51195
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,808]
Invista, S.A.R.L., Nylon Apparel
Filament Fibers Group, a Subsidiary of
Koch Industries, Inc., Chattanooga,
TN; Notice of Revised Determination
on Remand
On June 18, 2009, the U.S. Court of
International Trade (USCIT) remanded
to the Department of Labor’s motion for
further investigation into the matter of
Former Employees of Invista, S.A.R.L. v.
U.S Secretary of Labor, Court No. 07–
00160.
On December 15, 2006, an official of
Invista, S.A.R.L, Nylon Apparel
Filament Fibers Group, A Subsidiary of
Koch Industries, Inc., Chattanooga,
Tennessee (Invista) filed a petition for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) on behalf of workers
and former workers at Invista engaged
in activity related to the production of
nylon fiber. AR 1. The petition stated
that the separations were due to a shift
in production to Mexico that was the
basis for a certification that expired on
August 20, 2006 (TA–W–55,055). AR 2.
The company official stated that, as of
February 1, 2007, all workers of Invista
would be terminated from employment.
AR 7.
On February 7, 2007, the Department
of Labor (Department) issued a negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for TAA/ATAA. AR
30–32. On February 21, 2007, the
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
(72 FR 7909). AR 43.
In support of a request for
administrative reconsideration (dated
February 18, 2007), a worker stated that
the workers’ separations are ‘‘a direct
result of the textile industry going to
developing countries.’’ AR 38.
In a letter dated March 15, 2007, the
Department stated that the request for
reconsideration was being dismissed
because insufficient evidence was
furnished to warrant reconsideration
pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) and that the
shift in production that was the basis for
the certification of TA–W–55,055
occurred outside the relevant period.
AR 45. The Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration was issued on March
21, 2007. AR 47. The Department’s
Notice of dismissal was published in the
Federal Register on March 30, 2007 (72
FR 15169). AR 48.
On May 11, 2007, Plaintiffs sought
review by the USCIT. The Plaintiffs
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 191 (Monday, October 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51182-51195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23849]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
[Application No. L-11566]
Notice of Proposed Individual Exemption Involving Chrysler LLC,
Located in Auburn Hills, MI
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed individual exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This document contains a notice of pendency before the Department
of Labor (the Department) of a proposed individual exemption from
certain prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act or ERISA). The transactions
involve the UAW Chrysler Retiree Medical Benefits Plan (the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan) and its associated UAW Retiree Medical Benefits
Trust (the VEBA Trust) (collectively the VEBA).\1\ The proposed
exemption, if granted, would affect the VEBA, its participants and
beneficiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because the New Chrysler VEBA Plan will not be qualified
under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, there is no
jurisdiction under Title II of the Act pursuant to section 4975 of
the Code. However, there is jurisdiction under Title I of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Date: If granted, this proposed exemption will be
effective as of June 10, 2009.
DATES: Written comments and requests for a public hearing on the
proposed exemption should be submitted to the Department within 45 days
from the date of publication of this Federal Register Notice.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and requests for a public hearing
concerning the proposed exemption should be sent to the Office of
Exemption
[[Page 51183]]
Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5700,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC
20210, Attention: Application No. L-11566. Interested persons are also
invited to submit comments and/or hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail
or FAX. Any such comments or requests should be sent either by e-mail
to: chrysler@dol.gov, or by FAX to (202) 219-0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The application for exemption and the
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N-1513, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Buyniski or Warren Blinder,
Office of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, telephone (202) 693-8566.
(This is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document contains a notice of proposed
individual exemption from the restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A),
406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(a)(1)(E), 406(a)(2), 406(b)(1),
406(b)(2), and 407(a) of ERISA. The proposed exemption has been
requested in an application filed by New Chrysler pursuant to section
408(a) of ERISA and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29
CFR 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, August 10, 1990). Effective December
31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, (43 FR
47713, October 17, 1978) transferred the authority of the Secretary of
the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested to the Secretary
of Labor. Accordingly, this proposed exemption is being issued solely
by the Department.
Summary of Facts and Representations\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Summary of Facts and Representations is based on the
Applicant's representations and does not reflect the views of the
Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Applicant
Prior to filing for bankruptcy protection under chapter 11 of Title
11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code) on April 30, 2009,
Chrysler LLC (Chrysler LLC), a Delaware limited liability company, was
an American automobile manufacturer headquartered in Auburn Hills,
Michigan, first organized as Chrysler Corporation in 1925. Chrysler LLC
manufactured, assembled, and sold cars, trucks, and related automotive
parts and accessories primarily in the United States, Canada, and
Mexico. It supplied passenger cars, SUVs, sports tourers, minivans, and
pickups. The company also purchased and distributed passenger cars
manufactured by Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America. Prior to
filing for bankruptcy protection, Chrysler LLC employed approximately
55,000 hourly and salaried employees worldwide, about 70% of whom were
based in the United States. As of the date of the exemption application
filing, Chrysler LLC had 32 manufacturing and assembly facilities, 23
of which (or 69% of the vehicle production) are located in the United
States, and 24 parts depots, 20 of which are in this country.
Chrysler's business interests touched all 50 states, as well as Canada,
Mexico, Europe and Asia. Chrysler LLC has an expansive dealer network,
with over 3,200 dealerships in the United States selling Chrysler cars
and trucks (or 60% of the global dealer network). Seventy-two percent
of Chrysler LLC's sales were in the United States, and it purchased 78%
of its parts and materials from U.S.-based suppliers. For the twelve
months ended December 31, 2008, Chrysler LLC recorded revenue of more
than $48.5 billion and had assets of approximately $39.3 billion and
liabilities totaling $55.2 billion. During the same period, Chrysler
LLC had a net loss of approximately $16.8 billion.
From 1998 to 2007, Chrysler and its subsidiaries were part of the
German based DaimlerChrysler AG (now Daimler AG). Under
DaimlerChrysler, the company was named ``DaimlerChrysler Motors Company
LLC'', with its U.S. operations generally referred to as the ``Chrysler
Group''. On May 14, 2007, DaimlerChrysler announced the sale of 80.1%
of Chrysler Group to American private equity firm Cerberus Capital
Management, L.P., with Daimler continuing to hold a 19.9% stake. The
deal was finalized on August 3, 2007, and upon completion of the sale,
the company was renamed Chrysler LLC. On April 27, 2009, Daimler AG
signed a binding agreement to give up its 19.9% remaining stake in
Chrysler LLC to Cerberus Capital Management and pay as much as $600
million into the automaker's pension fund.
On May 31, 2009, in the course of the bankruptcy proceeding (the
Bankruptcy Proceeding), the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court) issued an opinion
granting Chrysler LLC's motion for authority to sell, pursuant to
section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, substantially all of its assets to
an entity called New Chrysler (New Chrysler).\3\ New Chrysler is a
Delaware limited liability company formed by Fiat North America LLC, a
subsidiary of Fiat S.p.A (Fiat). New Chrysler expects to remain
headquartered in Auburn Hills, Michigan, and expects to employ most of
Chrysler's approximately 55,000 hourly and salaried employees
worldwide, 70% or 38,500 of whom were based in the United States and
still manufactures, assembles, and sells cars, trucks, and related
automotive parts and accessories in the United States, Europe, Canada,
and Mexico. Pursuant to the UAW Retiree Settlement Agreement between
New Chrysler and the UAW (the Settlement Agreement), the UAW Chrysler
Retiree Medical Benefits Plan (the New Chrysler VEBA Plan) will be
established to provide retiree medical benefits to certain Chrysler-UAW
represented employees and retirees, and their spouses and
dependents.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In re Chrysler LLC, et al., No. 09B 50002 (Document 3073),
slip op. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 31, 2009).
\4\ Specifically, the New Chrysler VEBA Plan will provide
retiree medical benefits to members of the ``Class'' and the
``Covered Group'' as defined in the Settlement Agreement and in
Section VI. of this exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
Throughout much of 2007, Chrysler LLC and the UAW engaged in
extended discussions concerning the impact of rising health care costs
on Chrysler LLC's financial condition. During these discussions,
Chrysler LLC asserted that it had the right to unilaterally modify the
retiree health benefits under the Chrysler Health Care Program for
Hourly Employees and that, if no agreement was reached to address the
economic burden of its retiree health obligation, Chrysler LLC would do
so unilaterally. The UAW disagreed with Chrysler LLC's position and
asserted that retiree benefits were vested and that Chrysler LLC did
not have the right to modify them unilaterally. In 2007, the UAW along
with respective class representatives of plaintiff class members in UAW
v. Chrysler LLC (the ``English'' Case) filed a lawsuit challenging
Chrysler LLC's position and sought a permanent injunction prohibiting
such termination or modification. After an extensive review by the UAW
and Class Counsel (Class Counsel) of Chrysler LLC's ability to continue
providing retiree health care benefits, the parties entered into a
Settlement Agreement (English Settlement Agreement) on March 30, 2008,
providing, among other things,
[[Page 51184]]
that Chrysler LLC transfer responsibility and funding for retiree
health care benefits to a voluntary employee benefits association.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ In 2007 and 2009, Chrysler LLC agreed to provide certain
retiree medical benefits specified in certain memoranda of
understanding between Chrysler, the UAW and the class
representatives. Chrysler LLC and the UAW, along with respective
class representatives of plaintiff class members in UAW v. Chrysler,
LLC, Civ. Act. No. 2:07-cv-14310 (E.D. Mich, complaint filed October
11, 2007) (the ``English'' Case) entered into a separate settlement
agreement in 2007, which provided for Chrysler LLC to make certain
deposits and remittances to the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
for the provision of retiree medical benefits.
In light of the Bankruptcy Proceeding, the settlement in the
English case is of no further effect. Although not a party to the
Bankruptcy Proceeding or the Modified Settlement Agreement described
in this exemption application, the firm of Stember, Feinstein, Doyle
& Payne, LLC, as Class Counsel in the English case, was engaged to
render an opinion on the fairness, from a financial point of view,
of the consideration to be received by Chrysler LLC in connection
with the sale of assets to New Chrysler (the Sale), and also to
review the Modified Settlement Agreement described in this exemption
application. Class Counsel concurs that it is fair, reasonable and
in the best interest of the former class members, and supports the
request by New Chrysler for an individual exemption request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The English Settlement Agreement provided that on the later of
January 1, 2010, or final court approval of the Settlement Agreement,
Chrysler LLC would continue to provide retiree medical benefits for
class members, known as the ``Covered Group'', under the old Chrysler
Plan and would transfer certain assets to the VEBA Trust to provide the
Class and Covered Group with post-retirement medical benefits. The
English Settlement Agreement modified existing retiree medical benefits
and Chrysler LLC was obligated to provide benefits until January 1,
2010, and then funding of the benefits would be shifted to the VEBA
Trust. Under the English Settlement Agreement, Chrysler LLC's
obligation to provide post-retirement medical benefits to the Class and
Covered Group would be terminated. The Trust would be established and
maintained not by Chrysler LLC, but by an employees' beneficiary
association consisting of the population described in the English
Settlement Agreement and administered by an independent committee
(``Committee''). A Plan, to be funded exclusively through the VEBA
Trust, would be solely responsible for the payment of post-retirement
medical benefits to members of the Class and Covered Group on and after
January 1, 2010.
In September of 2008, a sharp downturn in sales significantly
affected Chrysler LLC. Soon thereafter, Chrysler LLC focused its
attention on acquiring a merger partner, but talks were put on hold
while the company sought government funds to prevent bankruptcy. In
December of 2008, Chrysler LLC received a $4 billion loan from the
United States Treasury Department to fund their operations through the
liquidity crunch. At the same time that Chrysler LLC was pursuing
government assistance, it continued its efforts to secure a strategic
partner that could assist it in achieving its long-term viability
goals. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, Chrysler LLC was required to
submit a plan showing that it was able to achieve and sustain long-term
viability, energy efficiency, rationalization of costs and
competitiveness in the U.S. marketplace, which would indicate Chrysler
LLC's ability to repay the financing.
These long-term production goals led Chrysler LLC to announce that
they were going to form a global alliance with Fiat S.p.A. On January
20, 2009, Fiat and Chrysler LLC announced that they had a non-binding
term sheet to form a global alliance. Under the terms of the potential
agreement, Fiat could take a 35% stake in Chrysler LLC and gain access
to its North American dealer network in exchange for providing Chrysler
LLC with the platform to build smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles in
the US and reciprocal access to Fiat's global distribution network.
Fiat is an Italian automobile manufacturer, engine manufacturer, and
financial and industrial group based in Turin. As of 2009, Fiat is the
world's 6th largest carmaker as well as Italy's largest carmaker.
Bankruptcy
In light of deteriorating market conditions and a growing liquidity
crisis that would make it impossible for Chrysler LLC to continue
operations, Chrysler LLC and 26 of its domestic direct and indirect
subsidiaries, filed a bankruptcy action under chapter 11 of Title 11 of
the United States Code (the ``Bankruptcy Code'') on April 30, 2009 with
the Bankruptcy Court and announced a plan for a partnership with
Italian automaker Fiat.\6\ As noted previously, the Bankruptcy Court
approved a sale under Section 363 of Title 11 of the U.S. Code by which
New Chrysler succeeded to certain assets and liabilities of Chrysler
LLC (``Section 363 Sale''). The Bankruptcy Court also approved the
Modified Settlement Agreement. The section 363 Sale closed, and the
Modified Settlement Agreement was executed, on June 10, 2009. The
assets in the Section 363 Sale were sold free and clear of liens,
claims, interests, and encumbrances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In connection with the Bankruptcy Proceeding, Chrysler LLC's
non-U.S. direct and indirect subsidiaries have not sought relief
under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code or any other insolvency
laws. Chrysler LLC's Mexican, Canadian and other international
operations are also not part of any bankruptcy filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through the Bankruptcy Proceeding, New Chrysler acquired certain
core assets from Chrysler LLC in exchange for the assumption of certain
liabilities of Chrysler LLC and a cash payment to Chrysler LLC pursuant
to the Master Transaction Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2009 as
subsequently amended (collectively with other ancillary and supporting
documents, the ``MTA'').
Pursuant to the MTA, Chrysler LLC transferred substantially all of
its operating assets to New Chrysler, and in exchange for those assets,
New Chrysler assumed certain liabilities of Chrysler LLC and paid
Chrysler LLC $2 billion in cash. New Chrysler is jointly owned by Fiat,
the US Treasury, the Governments of Canada and Ontario (the Canadian
Government) and the VEBA Trust. The transaction is expected to
strengthen New Chrysler's viability for the long term with access to
Fiat's existing technology, including competitive platforms,
powertrain, and vehicles to be produced at New Chrysler's manufacturing
sites. The transaction is also expected to allow Fiat and New Chrysler
to each take advantage of the other's distribution networks in key
growth markets and to optimize fully their respective manufacturing
footprint and global supplier base.
Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, New Chrysler, a Delaware
limited liability company, was formed by Fiat North America, LLC, as an
alliance entity \7\ for the acquisition of the assets from Chrysler LLC
generally free and clear of claims of Chrysler LLC's creditors.\8\ Upon
the closing of the sale, the government entities will hold 12.31% (The
U.S. Treasury will hold 9.85% and the Canadian Government will hold
2.46%), the New Chrysler VEBA Plan will hold 67.69%, and Fiat will hold
20% of the total value of shares (the Shares). Upon reaching certain
milestones, fully explained later in this exemption, Fiat's interest
will increase to 35%, with the right to acquire an additional 16% by
buying certain shares of New Chrysler. Fiat will not be able to get
control of New Chrysler until the outstanding debts to
[[Page 51185]]
the U.S. Treasury and Canada are paid in full. After the Sale, New
Chrysler became the new legal entity, Chrysler Group LLC. The claims of
Chrysler LLC's unsecured creditors were not assumed by New Chrysler
through the Bankruptcy Proceeding unless expressly provided for in the
MTA. Among the claims that were not assumed by New Chrysler, was the
obligation owed by Chrysler LLC to provide retiree medical benefits
pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding Post-Retirement Medical
Care, dated October 12, 2007, between Chrysler and the UAW and the
Memorandum of Understanding Post-Retirement Medical Care, dated April
29, 2009, between Chrysler and the UAW (together, the ``MOUs''), as
well as the English Settlement Agreement reached in UAW v. Chrysler,
LLC, Civ. Act. No. 2:07-cv-14310 (E.D. Mich. complaint filed October
11, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ None of the debtor's equity holders received an interest in
New Chrysler.
\8\ See In Re Chrysler LLC, et. al., Case No. 09B 50002
(Document 3073), slip op.(Bankr.S.D.N.Y. May 31, 2009)), the order
authorizing the sale of substantially all of the debtor's assets
free and clear of all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Chrysler represents that the Bankruptcy Proceeding and related
Sale are critical to the survival of the business previously conducted
by Chrysler LLC. New Chrysler's emergence from bankruptcy was dependent
on the achievement of a number of interrelated agreements among its
creditors, lenders, interested government agencies, and unionized
employees. To avoid the devastation to the global economy that would be
caused if Chrysler's business were to fail, the governments of the
United States, Canada, and the Province of Ontario have offered to fund
a new venture, New Chrysler, that will combine substantially all of
Chrysler LLC's core operating assets with advanced automotive
technology, distribution, procurement capabilities, and management
services of Fiat or its subsidiaries to create an ongoing viable
automobile company. Under these extraordinary and urgent circumstances,
the governments are prepared to subsidize the restructured New Chrysler
to ensure that a viable automobile manufacturing industry remains in
North America. Knowing how quickly New Chrysler's prospects could
deteriorate, however, the governments have placed stringent conditions
on their commitment. Those stringent conditions include the conditions
related to the exemption transaction, which is an integral component of
that larger picture.
The UAW asserted during the Bankruptcy Proceeding, and New Chrysler
denied, that New Chrysler was bound by the MOUs as a successor to
Chrysler LLC and that it was, therefore, responsible for providing the
retiree medical benefits contemplated. After due consideration of the
factual and legal arguments regarding this issue, as well as the costs,
risks, and delays associated with litigating the issue, New Chrysler
and the UAW agreed to enter into a settlement agreement, that was
presented to the Bankruptcy Court for approval after notice was
provided to affected parties. Ultimately, the Modified Settlement
Agreement was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and the initial steps
towards implementing the transactions that are at the heart of this
application began to occur as contemplated in that agreement.
After several months of arms length negotiations, the UAW has
asserted that, after due consideration of the issues involved and
seeking to avoid protracted litigation on the matter, it entered into a
Modified Settlement Agreement with New Chrysler under which New
Chrysler agreed to provide retiree medical benefits to a defined group
of current UAW retirees who were formerly employed by Chrysler LLC as
well as a defined group of current active employees (once retired) of
New Chrysler who are covered under a collective bargaining agreement
between New Chrysler and the UAW (collectively, the ``Covered Group'').
The medical benefit coverage for New Chrysler active employees prior to
their retirement is not within the scope of this Modified Settlement
Agreement and shall continue to be provided in accordance with the
terms of the applicable collective bargaining agreement and health care
benefit plan.
The Modified Settlement Agreement is another part of the complete
and integrated arm's-length transactions involving multiple parties,
including New Chrysler, Fiat, the Treasury Department, the Canadian
Government, and the UAW. Throughout the 2009 negotiations over the
terms of the Settlement Agreement, the parties engaged in extended
discussions concerning the impact of rising health care costs on New
Chrysler's financial viability. In this regard, the UAW has completed
its due diligence utilizing professional financial and legal advisors
with respect to the Modified Settlement Agreement and determined that
it is fair, reasonable and in the best interest of the Covered Group.
On June 10, 2009, 41 days after filing for bankruptcy protection,
the sale of most of Chrysler LLC's assets to New Chrysler was
completed. As discussed in more detail below, Fiat will initially own a
minority 20% stake of New Chrysler with the option of taking additional
equity up to a 35% stake if certain operational and capitalization
goals are achieved.
Ownership of New Chrysler
Following the bankruptcy proceeding and the sale of the assets from
Chrysler LLC to New Chrysler, initial ownership of New Chrysler will be
broken into two classes of membership interests, Class A (800,000
interests) and Class B (200,000 interests). Fiat will initially own the
200,000 Class B membership interests, representing 20% of the voting
and economic interest of New Chrysler; the United States Treasury
Department will own 98,461 Class A membership interests; the Canadian
Government will together own 24,615 Class A membership interests, and
the VEBA Trust will own 676,924 Class A membership interests (the Class
A membership interests initially owned by the Trust are referred to
herein as the ``Shares''), in each case, subject to the applicable
terms and conditions described below.
Initially, the Class A and Class B membership interests generally
are identical except that the Class B membership interests may
ultimately represent a greater percentage of the outstanding equity
interest in New Chrysler upon the occurrence of certain Class B events
(discussed below). Fiat has several other options to acquire additional
Class A membership interests (also discussed below) except that, until
the U.S. Treasury loan and the Canadian loan to New Chrysler have been
repaid in full, Fiat may not acquire additional membership interests if
such exercise or acquisition would cause the total interest held by
Fiat and its affiliates to exceed 49.9 percent. At a future date, the
earlier of January 1, 2013, or the date of any New Chrysler Initial
Public Offering (IPO), each outstanding Class B membership interest
will be automatically converted to Class A membership interests,
thereby reducing the Class B membership to zero.
Pursuant to the New Chrysler Operating Agreement (the Operating
Agreement), beginning on June 10, 2009, and ending on December 31,
2012, the occurrence of three events (the ``Class B events'') would
cause the value of Class B membership interests held by Fiat to
increase by 5% for each event, thereby increasing Fiat's interest up to
a maximum of 15% for all three events, without any new issuance of
shares. The Class B events are as follows:
(1) If New Chrysler receives government approvals for the
production of an engine based on the Fiat's fully integrated robotized
engine family to be manufactured in the U.S. and delivers a commitment
to begin commercial production of the engine as soon as commercially
practicable;
[[Page 51186]]
(2) if New Chrysler records cumulative revenues reported in the
quarterly financial statements in an amount specified in the New
Chrysler Operating Agreement attributable to the company's sales made
outside of the NAFTA Countries following the date of the Operating
Agreement and if New Chrysler executes one or more franchise agreements
covering in the aggregate at least 90% of the total Fiat group
automobile dealers in Latin America pursuant to which such dealers will
carry New Chrysler products;
(3) if New Chrysler receives ecological event governmental
approvals for a car based on Fiat platform technology that has fuel
efficiency measured by miles per gallon of at least 40 combined miles
per gallon fuel economy and delivers a commitment to begin assembly in
commercial quantities in a production facility located in the U.S. as
soon as commercially practicable.
According to the terms of the Operating Agreement, in the event
that Fiat determines that a Class B event has occurred prior to January
1, 2013, it must submit written notice to New Chrysler. After supplying
written notice, such event shall be deemed to have irrevocably occurred
unless the company supplies written notice of objection. If an
objection is raised, then New Chrysler and Fiat will attempt in good
faith to resolve the dispute. If no agreement is reached, then the
parties will enter into binding arbitration. Accordingly, the 200,000
Class B membership interests held by Fiat will increase to thirty-five
percent (35%) of the voting and economic interest of New Chrysler and
the 800,000 Class A membership interests held by the Treasury
Department, the Canadian Government and the VEBA Trust will be diluted
to sixty-five percent (65%) of the voting and economic interest of New
Chrysler.
On the earlier of January 1, 2013 or any New Chrysler IPO, each
outstanding Class B membership interest will be exchanged for Class A
membership interests in an amount such that the proportional interest
of Fiat in New Chrysler is unchanged.
Alternative and Incremental Call Options
If one or more of the Class B events does not occur prior to
January 1, 2013, Fiat will have the option beginning on January 1, 2013
and ending on June 30, 2016, to purchase from New Chrysler 5% of the
Class A membership interests for each Class B event that has not
occurred (the Alternative Call Option). The price will be calculated
pursuant to a formula, the use of which depends upon whether or not New
Chrysler has completed an IPO before Fiat exercises any call options,
and which has been designed to approximate the fair market value of the
interests at the time of exercise. Fiat additionally has the option to
purchase from the Company Class A membership interests in an aggregate
amount of up to 16% of the outstanding membership interests (the
``Incremental Call Option''). The time frame for Fiat to exercise this
option is the same as for the Alternative Call Option (January 1, 2013
through June 30, 2016).
Call Option Agreement
Initially, New Chrysler will not be publicly traded, though there
are mechanisms for the VEBA Trust to sell the Shares under certain
conditions to other parties prior to New Chrysler becoming a publicly
traded company. The VEBA Trust, Fiat, the Treasury Department and the
Canadian Government agreed to provide Fiat with additional incentives
to encourage Fiat to take action that will increase the aggregate value
of the parties' investment in New Chrysler. Thus, in accordance with
the Call Option Agreement, between July 1, 2012 and June 1, 2016, Fiat
has the option to purchase from the VEBA Trust up to 40% of the VEBA
Trust's equity interests in New Chrysler. These interests consist of
the 676,924 Class A membership interests issued to the VEBA Trust by
New Chrysler on closing, less any interests that the VEBA Trust has
already disposed of under the Equity Recapture Agreement (as more fully
discussed below) at the time of exercise. Fiat may purchase no more
than 20% of such interests within any six-month period. Fiat's ability
to exercise its rights under the Call Option Agreement is limited by
the requirement that, until New Chrysler has repaid its loan from the
United States Treasury and the Canadian Government in full, Fiat may
not own more than 49.9% of the outstanding equity interests in New
Chrysler.
The exercise price will be determined pursuant to a formula which
is designed to arrive at the fair market value of the interests. The
exercise price may be adjusted if, upon exercise, the VEBA Trust elects
to transfer to Fiat interests in one or more entities through which,
for tax and administrative purposes, the VEBA Trust holds membership
interests (each such entity, a ``VEBA HoldCo'').\9\ Transfer of VEBA
HoldCo interests, rather than direct transfer of membership interests,
would prevent Fiat from obtaining a step-up in tax basis. Thus, Fiat
might be required to recognize additional gain upon a subsequent
disposition, beyond any gain attributable to the period in which Fiat
owns the membership interests. The Call Option Agreement provides for a
reduction in price to compensate for this increased tax liability,
offset by any positive tax attributes for Fiat (e.g., net operating
losses) caused by receiving interests in the VEBA HoldCo rather than
membership interests directly. If Fiat, the VEBA, and the United States
Treasury cannot agree on the amount of such an adjustment, each has a
right to appoint an arbitrator to a panel of three arbitrators who will
determine the amount of the adjustment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ VEBA Holdco means one or more Delaware limited liability
companies and/or corporations to which the VEBA Trust transferred
all or part of the Membership Interests issued to the VEBA Trust
pursuant to the Equity Subscription Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Offer Right and Equity Recapture Agreement
In addition to the Call Options, Fiat will have the first right to
purchase all or a part of the Shares (the ``First Offer Right'') if a
third party has offered to purchase some or all of the Shares beginning
two (2) years after the Closing Date as defined in the New Chrysler
Operating Agreement. When the Committee receives the proposed Sale
offer after the start of the First Offer Right period, the Committee
must issue written notice to Fiat, the Treasury Department, the
Canadian Government, and New Chrysler stating its intention to sell
some or all of the Shares, the number of such Shares, the price and
terms the Committee proposes to be paid for such Shares, and other
material terms of the proposed Sale (the ``First Notice''). For thirty
(30) days after the issuance of the First Notice, Fiat will have the
irrevocable non-transferable First Offer Right to purchase all or a
portion of the Shares subject to the proposed Sale, at the price and
under the terms and conditions of such proposed Sale.
Also under the New Chrysler Operating Agreement, at any time prior
to an initial public offering of New Chrysler, holders of 75% of
outstanding membership interests in New Chrysler may decide to transfer
a majority of membership interests to a third party. In that event,
those holders may also require all holders of membership interests to
transfer their interests on the same terms and for the same
consideration (the ``Drag-Along Right''). The VEBA Trust may elect to
transfer membership interests directly or to transfer interests in one
or more VEBA Holdcos; if the VEBA Trust transfers interests in VEBA
Holdcos, then
[[Page 51187]]
consideration paid the VEBA Trust pursuant to such a transaction would
be adjusted for the same equitable tax-related factors described above
under the Call Option Agreement. On behalf of the VEBA Trust, the
Independent Fiduciary would negotiate in good faith with the New
Chrysler Board of Directors (the ``Board'') over the amount of any
adjustment in price resulting from the transfer of interests in a VEBA
HoldCo. If the Board and the Independent Fiduciary could not come to an
agreed-upon resolution, the Independent Fiduciary would appoint one of
the three members of a board of arbitrators who would determine the
amount of the adjustment. The second arbitrator would be appointed by
the Board, and the third would be agreed upon by the Board and the
Independent Fiduciary, or, failing such agreement, appointed by the
administering authority for the American Arbitration Association.
In addition to the above-described agreements, and as a condition
to the Treasury Department's agreement to provide financing for New
Chrysler, the VEBA Trust has entered into a separate agreement with the
Treasury Department referred to as an Equity Recapture Agreement. Under
the terms of the Equity Recapture Agreement, if the VEBA realizes from
the sale of the Shares a total value of more than the threshold amount
of $4.25 billion, increased at nine percent (9%) per annum starting on
January 1, 2010 (the ``Threshold Amount''), the VEBA agrees to pay to
the Treasury Department the proceeds received in excess of the
Threshold Amount plus any remaining Shares still held by the VEBA (the
``Contingent Value Right''). The nine percent (9%) per annum cap on the
increase is derived from actuarial assumptions that were used to
determine the amount of appreciation required to provide the
anticipated benefits under the Plan. In addition, the Treasury
Department has the right, at any time, to purchase all outstanding
Shares held by the VEBA Trust for an amount equal to the Threshold
Amount less the amount of any proceeds already received by the VEBA
Trust in respect of any of the Shares. This right expires upon the
earlier of its exercise and the VEBA Trust's surrender of all remaining
New Chrysler interests held by the VEBA Trust to the Treasury
Department.
If on December 31, 2014, December 31, 2016, or December 31, 2018,
the VEBA Trust's Shares are not equal to the value of the Threshold
Amount, and the VEBA Trust or a VEBA Trust-controlled affiliate
continues to hold Shares, the VEBA Trust is obligated under the Equity
Recapture Agreement to transfer a portion of such Shares to the
Treasury Department. The value of the transferred Shares will equal a
set percentage of the Black Scholes value of the Treasury Department's
Contingent Value Right. The applicable percentages of the value of the
Contingent Value Right to be transferred on each of December 31, 2014,
December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2018, are 33%, 50%, and 100%,
respectively. The amounts transferred on prior Interim Settlement Dates
are subtracted from the amount to be transferred on each Interim
Settlement Date.
The Black Scholes value of the Contingent Value Right will be
determined using the following assumptions: (1) A Share price based on
the average over the prior 60 days of trading; (2) a time to maturity
equal to ten years, seven years, or five years, on December 31, 2014,
December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2018, respectively; (3) an exercise
price based on an implied future stock price equivalent to the
Threshold Amount on the applicable maturity date; and (4) a risk free
interest rate equal to the rate for a U.S. Treasury Note for a term
equal to the assumed time to maturity.
If New Chrysler stock is not publicly traded on an Interim
Settlement Date, the U.S. Treasury and the VEBA will each appoint an
independent nationally recognized investment bank to conduct a separate
appraisal of the value of the Contingent Value Right. If the separate
appraisals yield values within 10% of each other, those values will be
averaged. If the separate appraisals are more than 10% apart, the VEBA
and the U.S. Treasury will appoint a third independent appraiser, whose
determination will be averaged with the determination closest to that
of the third independent appraiser.
Establishment of the New VEBA Plan and Trust
The Modified Settlement Agreement provides that, upon the
``Implementation Date'', the retiree medical benefit obligations to the
``Covered Group'' will become fixed and such obligations will be
transferred to the New Chrysler VEBA Plan and the VEBA Trust, which has
been established to fund benefits under the Plan. The New Chrysler VEBA
Plan and the VEBA Trust shall, as of the Implementation Date, be the
employee welfare benefit plan and trust that are exclusively
responsible for all retiree medical benefits with respect to the Class
and the Covered Group. The UAW Chrysler Retirees Employees Beneficiary
Association, an employee organization within the meaning of section
3(4) of ERISA (``Chrysler Retiree EBA''), acting through the Committee,
will establish and maintain the New Chrysler VEBA Plan, subject to
ERISA, to provide retiree health benefits to the Class and Covered
Group after the Implementation Date, which will be December 31, 2009.
Prior to the Section 363 Sale, the Old Chrysler Plan provided retiree
health benefits to the Class and the Covered Group; following the
closing of the Section 363 Sale, the New Chrysler Plan (``New Chrysler
VEBA Plan'') assumed responsibility for the provision of the benefits
with respect to claims incurred on or before the Implementation Date.
The New Chrysler VEBA Plan will be responsible for benefit claims
incurred after the Implementation Date. It is anticipated that there
will be approximately 120,000 participants and beneficiaries of the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan beginning on January 1, 2010.
After the Implementation Date, the Committee will have sole
responsibility to determine the scope and level of retiree health
benefits available to the Class and Covered Group under the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan. The Committee may raise or lower the level of
retiree health care benefits available to the Class and Covered Group.
In exercising its authority over benefit design, the Committee shall be
guided by the principle that the New Chrysler VEBA Plan should provide
substantial health benefits for the duration of the lives of all
participants and beneficiaries in the Plan.
The UAW Chrysler Retirees EBA along with the UAW General Motors
Company Retirees EBA and the UAW Ford Retirees EBA, each acting through
the Committee, established the VEBA Trust on October 16, 2008. The VEBA
Trust will be the funding source for the New Chrysler VEBA Plan. The
VEBA Trust is the subject of a trust agreement between the trustee and
the Committee, acting on behalf of the respective EBAs. The VEBA Trust
is intended to be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(9) of the Internal
Revenue Code, as amended, and, as a trust holding assets of plans
subject to ERISA, will itself be subject to ERISA's fiduciary
responsibility standards.
The VEBA Trust will have three separate retiree accounts, designed
to segregate payments attributable to General Motors (GM), Ford, and
Chrysler, pursuant to the terms of each company's settlement agreement
with the UAW and each respective class. Each retiree account will be a
separate, dedicated account, to be used for the sole purpose of funding
benefits provided under the separate plans,
[[Page 51188]]
providing health benefits to the retirees of GM, Ford and Chrysler, and
defraying the reasonable expenses of each plan. Each retiree account
will contain a separate sub-account maintained to hold any employer
security. Assets from one retiree account may not offset the
liabilities or defray the expenses attributable to another retiree
account. The VEBA Trust was structured in this way to allow for the
pooled investment of assets and to provide economies of scale to the
respective plans' investments, while maintaining a separate plan for
each three retiree classes. Unless the Committee decides to establish
segregated investment vehicles for specific separate retiree accounts,
the assets of the separate retiree accounts, other than any employer
security sub-account, will be invested on a pooled basis within the
VEBA Trust (provided that the interest of each account remains
separately accounted for).
The Modified Settlement Agreement itself contemplates three
separate and distinct funding sources for the VEBA Trust: (1) Assets
held under a pre-existing internal Chrysler VEBA (the ``Preexisting
Internal VEBA'') that are attributable to the UAW retirees covered
under the Modified Settlement Agreement--such assets were valued at
$1,589,500,000 as of March 31, 2009, and those assets, plus the
earnings thereon, are expected to be contributed to the VEBA Trust on
or about January 1, 2010; (2) the Shares, which will represent sixty-
seven and sixty-nine one-hundredths percent (67.69%) of the fully
diluted ownership of New Chrysler as of the consummation of the Sale;
and (3) a note issued by New Chrysler with a principal amount of
$4,587,000,000 and an implicit interest rate of nine percent (9%) (the
``Note'') payable in fixed annual installments pursuant to the
following schedule:
(i) Payment of $315 million on July 15, 2010
(ii) Payment of $300 million on July 15, 2011
(iii) Payment of $400 million on July 15, 2012
(iv) Payment of $600 million on July 15, 2013
(v) Payment of $650 million on July 15, 2014
(vi) Payment of $650 million on July 15, 2015
(vii) Payment of $650 million on July 15, 2016
(viii) Payment of $650 million on July 15, 2017
(ix) Payment of $823.8 million on July 15, 2018
(x) Payment of $823.8 million on July 15, 2019
(xi) Payment of $823.8 million on July 15, 2020
(xii) Payment of $823.8 million on July 15, 2021
(xiii) Payment of $823.8 million on July 15, 2022
(xiv) Final Payment of $827.1 million on July 15, 2023
The Shares and the Note were contributed to the VEBA Trust on the
closing date of the Sale, which was June 10, 2009.
The Trustee, State Street Bank and Trust Company, shall hold the
assets and income of the Trust in accordance with the terms of the New
Chrysler VEBA Plan. According to the applicant, the Trustee has no
discretionary authority with respect to the investment of assets held
in the VEBA Trust, and must exercise its power in accordance with the
instructions of the Independent Fiduciary with respect to any employer
security, and in all other cases the instructions of the Committee or
any investment manager that may be appointed by the Committee.\10\
Subject to the direction of the Independent Fiduciary with respect to
any employer security, the Trustee shall make payments from the VEBA
Trust Fund to pay benefits under the Plans as directed by the Committee
or its designee. According to the terms of the Trust agreement, the
Trustee may be removed by the Committee at any time upon thirty (30)
days' advance written notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Under ERISA section 403(a)(1), a plan may expressly provide
that a trustee is subject to the direction of a named fiduciary who
is not a trustee, in which case the trustee shall be subject to
proper directions of such fiduciary which are made in accordance
with the terms of the plan and which are not contrary to the Act. 29
U.S.C. 1103(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Committee
The Committee will serve as Plan Administrator and will be a named
fiduciary of the New Chrysler VEBA Plan. The Committee will determine
the benefits to be provided under the Plan, including, without
limitation, which participants will receive benefits, in what form, and
in what amount, and the contributions that the participants will be
required to make to help defray the cost of their coverage. The
Committee, acting on behalf of the EBAs, shall be responsible for the
implementation, amendment and overall operation of the VEBA Trust and
the establishment, amendment, maintenance, and administration of the
Plans (i.e., Chrysler, Ford and GM). Subject to the provisions of the
VEBA Trust and applicable laws, the Committee shall have sole, absolute
and discretionary authority to adopt such rules and provisions and take
all actions that it deems desirable for the administration of the VEBA
Trust, and to interpret the terms of the Plans and VEBA Trust. The
Committee shall be guided by the principle that the Plans should
provide substantial health benefits for the duration of the lives of
all participants and beneficiaries.
The Committee consists of eleven (11) individuals, five (5)
appointed by the UAW and six (6) who are Independent Members.
Independent Member terms shall be for three (3)-year periods, except
the initial terms of four (4) of the six (6) original Independent
Members, two (2) of whom shall have an initial term of two (2) years,
and two of whom shall have an initial term of one (1) year. An
Independent Member may serve more than one term. Neither Chrysler LLC
nor New Chrysler has any appointment power, and the Committee will
function independently of both. The initial Independent Members were
approved by the district court in the English case. No member of the
Committee may be a current or former officer, director or employee of
Old GM (i.e., prior to bankruptcy), New GM, Ford, Chrysler LLC or New
Chrysler, except that a retiree who was represented by the UAW in his
or her employment with either Old GM, New GM, Ford, Chrysler LLC, or
New Chrysler or an employee of any such company who is on leave from
the company and is represented by the UAW, may be a UAW Member. None of
the Independent Members nor any of their family members, employers or
partners may have any financial or institutional relationship with
either Old GM, New GM, Ford, Chrysler LLC, or New Chrysler if such
relationship could reasonably be expected to impair such Independent
Member's exercise of independent judgment.
An Independent Member may be removed or replaced, and a successor
designated, at any time by an affirmative vote of nine (9) of the other
members of the Committee. In the event of a vacancy of an Independent
Member position, whether by expiration of a term, resignation, removal,
incapacity, or death of an Independent Member, a successor Independent
Member shall be elected by the affirmative vote of nine (9) Members,
and when possible, such successor Independent Member shall be elected
prior to the expiration of the term, resignation, removal, incapacity,
or death of the Independent Member being replaced. The UAW Members
shall serve at the discretion of the UAW International President, and
may be removed or replaced, and a successor designated, at any time by
written
[[Page 51189]]
notice from the UAW International President to the Committee.
A majority of the Members of the Committee then in office shall
constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting any business;
provided that at least one Independent Member and one UAW Member are
present. Each Member of the Committee present at the meeting shall have
one vote. All actions of the Committee shall be by majority vote of the
entire Committee, provided that at least one Independent Member and one
Union Member must be a Member in the majority for any Committee action
to take effect.
Independent Fiduciary
Pursuant to the Trust Agreement of the VEBA Trust, the Committee,
in its sole discretion, will appoint an Independent Fiduciary to manage
the Employer Security Sub-Account following the consummation of the
Section 363 Sale.\11\ The Independent Fiduciary shall be a bank, trust
company or registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940, as amended. The Independent Fiduciary will be a ``named
fiduciary'' and ``investment manager'' as defined in ERISA and shall
act on behalf of the New Chrysler VEBA Plan and VEBA Trust in
connection with the discretionary management and disposition (but not
the acquisition) of all employer securities contributed to the VEBA
Trust by New Chrysler including, as currently relevant, the Notes and
the Shares (including valuation of the Shares), the Call Option and any
other employer securities held by the VEBA Trust. The exercise of any
discretionary rights appurtenant to the Shares, the Note, or the Call
Options (excluding the VEBA Trust's acceptance of the contribution of
such Shares, and Note) shall be directed by the Independent Fiduciary.
In effect, the parties anticipate that the Independent Fiduciary will
``step into the shoes'' of the VEBA Trust in connection with the
Trust's exercise of its rights and responsibilities as owner of the
Notes and the Shares, with the sole exception of the Trust's right to
appoint (with the approval of the UAW) a director to the New Chrysler
Board.\12\ The appointment of the Independent Fiduciary to perform
these functions is a contractual obligation of the VEBA Trust. In
addition, the Committee believes it is appropriate and desirable to
appoint an Independent Fiduciary with specialized expertise as
investment manager for purposes of the protections afforded by ERISA
section 405(d). Additionally, under the Shareholder Rights Agreement,
the New Chrysler VEBA Plan must vote its Membership Interest in New
Chrysler in accordance with the recommendations of the independent
directors of New Chrysler, in proportion to those recommendations.
Therefore, the Independent Fiduciary will have no responsibility for
the voting of the Membership Interests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The sub-account is maintained by the Trustee within each
Separate Retiree Account to hold separately any Employer Security
and any proceeds from the disposition of any Employer Security.
\12\ Generally, the Committee will remain responsible for
corporate and tax matters relating to the creation and maintenance
(e.g., corporate and tax filings and elections, annual reports,
etc.) of one or more ``passive,'' wholly owned title-holding LLCs
that will actually take legal title to the New Chrysler interests on
behalf of the VEBA. These holding entities are contemplated in the
various transaction documents, will elect to be taxed as ``C''
corporations, and will exist primarily for tax reasons (relating to
VEBA tax qualification and unrelated business income tax
considerations).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Independent Fiduciary must be independent of and unrelated to
Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the UAW and the Committee or their
affiliates. This provision will be violated if (1) such fiduciary
directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the UAW, the Committee or
their affiliates, (2) such fiduciary directly or indirectly receives
any compensation or other consideration from Chrysler LLC, New
Chrysler, the UAW or any Committee member in his or her individual
capacity in connection with any transaction described in this exemption
(except that an independent fiduciary may receive compensation from the
Committee or the New Chrysler VEBA Plan for services provided to the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan in connection with the transactions discussed
herein if the amount or payment of such compensation is not contingent
upon or in any way affected by the independent fiduciary's ultimate
decision), and (3) the annual gross revenue received by the fiduciary,
in any fiscal year, from Chrysler LLC, New Chrysler, the UAW or a
member of the Committee in his or her individual capacity, exceeds 3%
of the fiduciary's annual gross revenue from all sources (for federal
income tax purposes) for its prior tax year.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Department notes that candidates for the position of
Independent Fiduciary to the New Chrysler VEBA Plan may be
affiliated with entities that provide services to Old GM, New GM,
Ford, Chrysler LLC or New Chrysler or their affiliates. It is the
responsibility of the Committee to determine whether such
affiliations are likely to affect the judgment of the candidate in
performing its services as Independent Fiduciary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Independent Fiduciary may be removed by the Committee on 30
days written notice only for cause.\14\ The removal will be effective
as specified in the written notice, provided that the Independent
Fiduciary has been given notice of the appointment of a successor
independent fiduciary. No successor will be appointed in the event the
New Chrysler VEBA Plan ceases to hold any employer security. In the
event that the New Chrysler VEBA Plan subsequently acquires or holds an
employer security and no appointment of a successor independent
fiduciary has been made, any court of competent jurisdiction may, upon
application by the retiring independent fiduciary, appoint a successor
after such notice to the Committee and the retiring independent
fiduciary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Cause is defined in the Independent Fiduciary Agreement as:
(i) Any disqualifying event described in ERISA section 411; (ii)
determination by any court, arbitrator or government regulatory body
that the Independent Fiduciary has violated any civil or criminal
law (including, but not limited to, securities, antitrust or ERISA)
in connection with the performance of its responsibilities to the
VEBA Trust (For purposes of avoidance of doubt in connection with
this and the subsequent subparagraph, a ``determination'' shall mean
any written judgment, order or decree; court-approved settlement;
arbitration award; or enforcement action of a government regulatory
body or SRO, in the form of a written sanction, claim, demand or
opinion, whether or not appealable); (iii) determination by any
court, arbitrator or government regulatory body that the Independent
Fiduciary has materially breached the terms of its engagement,
whether or not appealable; (iv) any action by the Independent
Fiduciary that results in imposition of a civil or criminal
sanction, any prohibited transaction excise tax, or any civil
judgment or award of damages, on the VEBA Trust, the Committee, the
trustee, or their respective employees, officers directors or owners
(whether or not subject to indemnity by the Independent Fiduciary,
an insurer, or any other person); (v) termination, resignation, or
death of the Independent Fiduciary principal or officer assigned to
serve as the relationship principal with respect to the VEBA Trust,
or the inability of such person to perform his or her duties for a
continuous period of more than 30 days; (vi) any change of ownership
of the Independent Fiduciary that constitutes an ``assignment'' of
the Independent Fiduciary's contract with the VEBA Trust, within the
meaning of the Investment Advisers Act; (vii) failure of the
Independent Fiduciary to qualify as an ``investment manager'' within
the meaning of ERISA section 3(38); (viii) any change in the
clientele, business or ownership of the Independent Fiduciary that
results in an actual conflict of interest; (ix) failure of the
Independent Fiduciary to take into account the legitimate needs of
the VEBA Trust for liquidity to pay benefits; (x) violation of any
conditions imposed on the Independent Fiduciary under the terms of
the prohibited transaction exemption issued by the Department; (xi)
any other action or inaction of the Independent Fiduciary that the
Committee determines to be a material breach of the Independent
Fiduciary's agreement or any law, or is likely to result in an
irreconcilable conflict; (xii) any circumstance that leads the
Committee to reasonably conclude that the termination of the
Independent Fiduciary and replacement by a successor Independent
Fiduciary is in the financial interest of the VEBA Trust, provided
that the Committee documents the reasons for the termination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 51190]]
Following the second anniversary of the Closing Date, under the New
Chrysler Operating Agreement, the VEBA Trust and other holders of
Shares may transfer their interests in New Chrysler to third parties.
Under the Trust Agreement, the Independent Fiduciary would exercise the
VEBA Trust's right to make such transfers. Before transferring New
Chrysler Membership Interests to a third party, non-Fiat holders must
afford Fiat a right of first offer, and other holders a right of second
offer, whereby Fiat or the other holders could purchase the interests
to be transferred on the same terms as the terms offered to the third
party. With respect to employer securities held by the VEBA Trust, the
Independent Fiduciary would have the responsibility to afford Fiat the
right of first offer and other holders the right of second offer
according to the terms of the New Chrysler Operating Agreement.
The rights of the VEBA Trust under the Shareholders Agreement and
the Registration Rights Agreement are rights concerning the management
and disposition of employer securities, and as such, according to the
terms of the VEBA Trust, will be exercised by the Independent
Fiduciary. The Independent Fiduciary will determine when and whether to
exercise certain registration rights.
The Committee delegated to a subcommittee (i.e., three Committee
members) the responsibility to retain an Independent Fiduciary on
behalf of the New Chrysler VEBA Plan. The subcommittee initially
determined to proceed with the assumption that the interests of each
plan whose assets are held by the VEBA Trust would be best served by
seeking to retain a single qualified Independent Fiduciary to represent
all three plans (providing health benefits, respectively, to retirees
of Chrysler, GM, and Ford). However, the subcommittee recognizes the
possibility that engaging multiple Independent Fiduciaries may turn out
to be the better option.
The subcommittee intends, as part of the interview process for
potential candidates for the Independent Fiduciary appointment, to
question the candidates on the nature and likelihood of potential
conflicts of interest, the appropriate means of monitoring and
communicating actual or potential conflicts, including whether the
candidates currently have formal conflict monitoring procedures, and
mechanisms for dealing with actual or potential conflicts as they are
identified. After reviewing the candidates' qualifications, capacity to
represent all three plans, willingness to do so, and other relevant
factors, in consultation with counsel, the subcommittee anticipates
making a final determination as to whether to hire one Independent
Fiduciary or multiple Independent Fiduciaries.
The subcommittee will work with the Independent Fiduciary
candidate(s) to develop procedures to identify, minimize and address
conflicts of interest as they arise. Specifically, in the event that a
single Independent Fiduciary is appointed, the subcommittee will engage
a ``conflicts monitor'' to (i) develop a process for identifying
potential conflicts, (ii) to regularly review the Independent Fiduciary
reports, investment banker reports, and public information regarding
the companies, to identify the presence of factors that could lead to a
conflict, and (iii) further question the Independent Fiduciary when
appropriate.
Additionally, the subcommittee will be prepared to replace the
Independent Fiduciary in the event of an actual and irreconcilable
conflict of interest.
Finally, the subcommittee will require the Independent Fiduciary to
adopt a written policy regarding conflicts of interest. Such policy
will require that, as part of the Independent Fiduciary's periodic
reporting to the Committee, the Independent Fiduciary includes a
discussion of actual or potential conflicts identified by the
Independent Fiduciary and options for avoiding or resolving the
conflict.
A separate investment bank will be retained with respect to each of
the three plans comprising the VEBA Trust. The investment bank's
initial recommendations would be made solely with the goal of
maximizing the returns for the single plan that owns the securities for
which the investment bank is responsible. If the Independent Fiduciary
deviated from such initial recommendations, it would find it necessary
to explain why it deviated from a recommendation; additionally, such a
deviation would be a way for the Committee or its designee to flag
possible conflicts of interest in advance. Any contract between the
Independent Fiduciary and an investment banker will include an
acknowledgement by the investment banker that the investment banker's
ultimate client is an ERISA plan.
Board of Directors
In addition to the VEBA Trust's ownership interest in New Chrysler,
for so long as the VEBA Trust remains a member of, and retains at least
a fifteen percent (15%) interest in, New Chrysler, the VEBA Trust shall
have the right exercised by the Committee to designate one
representative to the New Chrysler Board of Directors (the ``Board''),
subject to the prior written consent of the UAW. Pursuant to the New
Chrysler Operating Agreement, the Board will initially consist of nine
(9) members; three (3) of whom will be appointed by Fiat, three (3) of
whom will be appointed by the Treasury Department (which three
directors will in turn appoint a fourth director (the ``Final
Director'')), one (1) of whom will be appointed by the Canadian
Government, and one (1) of whom will be appointed by the VEBA Trust (as
described above). In addition, for so long as the VEBA Trust owns any
membership interests in New Chrysler, the VEBA Trust has agreed to vote
its membership interests in accordance with the recommendations of the
independent directors of the Board, in proportion to such
recommendations. Fiat will have the right to appoint four (4) directors
once it obtains an aggregate ownership interest of thirty-five percent
(35%) or more in New Chrysler and the Final Director will resign once
Fiat obtains the right to appoint a fourth director.
Administrative Exemptive Relief
New Chrysler's financial circumstances preclude it from paying cash
to the New Chrysler VEBA Plan. As explained above, the Bankruptcy
Proceeding and related Sale were vital for the survival of the business
previously conducted by Chrysler and this exemption request is critical
to the larger overall transaction. Certain transactions called for or
necessitated by the Settlement Agreement between New Chrysler and the
New Chrylser VEBA Plan are prohibited by the restrictions of 406 of
ERISA.\15\ Accordingly, the