In the Matter of Certain Video Game Machines and Related Three-Dimensional Pointing Devices; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement, 50820-50821 [E9-23665]

Download as PDF PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES 50820 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 189 / Thursday, October 1, 2009 / Notices (c) The quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (d) The quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s). (e) The value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country(ies), provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2008 (report quantity data in pounds, drained weight, and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country(ies), provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2008 (report quantity data in pounds, drained weight, and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and dutypaid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties). If you are a trade/ business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise VerDate Nov<24>2008 19:32 Sep 30, 2009 Jkt 217001 in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; and (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) The quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country after 2003, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: September 25, 2009. PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–23564 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–658] In the Matter of Certain Video Game Machines and Related ThreeDimensional Pointing Devices; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 44) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–1999. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on September 23, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. of Rockville, Maryland (‘‘Hillcrest’’), alleging violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. **1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 189 / Thursday, October 1, 2009 / Notices certain video game machines and related three-dimensional pointing devices by reason of infringement of certain claims of United States Patent Nos. 7,139,983; 7,158,118; 7,262,760; and 7,414,611. 73 FR 54854 (September 23, 2008). The complaint named Nintendo Co., Ltd. of Japan and Nintendo of America, Inc. of Redmond, WA (collectively, ‘‘Nintendo’’) as respondents. On August 21, 2009, Hillcrest and Nintendo jointly moved to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. On August 31, 2009, the Commission investigative attorney supported the motion. On September 8, 2009, the presiding administrative law judge issued the subject ID terminating the investigation. No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. Issued: September 28, 2009. William R. Bishop, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–23665 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree in United States v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc., et al. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Notice is hereby given that on September 25, 2009, a proposed Consent Decree was lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in United States v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc., et al., Case No. 09–cv–0135. The Consent Decree between the United States, on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘U.S. EPA’’), and the settling defendant relates to certain liabilities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., in connection with the Watertown Tire Fire Site in Watertown, Wisconsin (the ‘‘Site’’). Under the proposed Consent VerDate Nov<24>2008 19:32 Sep 30, 2009 Jkt 217001 Decree, the settling defendant is required to pay $3,500 to reimburse costs incurred by U.S. EPA in connection with the Site. The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the Consent Decree for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc., et al., DJ Ref. No. 90– 11–3–09429. The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, 517 E. Wisconsin Ave., Suite 530, Milwaukee, WI 53202–4580 by request to Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Richmond, and at the U.S. EPA Region V, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604. During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site: http:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $4.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. Maureen Katz, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. E9–23748 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Parole Commission Public Announcement; Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94–409) [5 U.S.C. 552b]; Meeting Notice TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Tuesday, October 6, 2009. PLACE: 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815. STATUS: Open. PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 50821 MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting: 1. Approval of Minutes of July 16, 2009 Quarterly Business Meeting. 2. Approval of Final Rule on Applying the 1987 DC Board of Parole Guidelines to Sellmon cases. 3. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, Chief of Staff, and Section Administrators. AGENCY CONTACT: Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States Parole Commission. (301) 492–5990. Dated: September 24, 2009. Rockne J. Chickinell, General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission. [FR Doc. E9–23593 Filed 9–30–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–31–M DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request September 25, 2009. The Department of Labor (DOL) hereby announces the submission of the following public information collection requests (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each ICR, with applicable supporting documentation; including among other things a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain or by contacting Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free number)/e-mail: DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Department of Labor—ETA, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 202–395–7316/Fax: 202–395–5806 (these are not toll-free numbers), e-mail: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov within 30 days from the date of this publication in the Federal Register. In order to ensure the appropriate consideration, comments should reference the OMB Control Number (see below). The OMB is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 189 (Thursday, October 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50820-50821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-658]


In the Matter of Certain Video Game Machines and Related Three-
Dimensional Pointing Devices; Notice of Commission Decision Not To 
Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on 
a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 44) granting a 
joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based on a 
settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-1999. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on September 23, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Hillcrest 
Laboratories, Inc. of Rockville, Maryland (``Hillcrest''), alleging 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. **1337) 
in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, 
and the sale within the United States after importation of

[[Page 50821]]

certain video game machines and related three-dimensional pointing 
devices by reason of infringement of certain claims of United States 
Patent Nos. 7,139,983; 7,158,118; 7,262,760; and 7,414,611. 73 FR 54854 
(September 23, 2008). The complaint named Nintendo Co., Ltd. of Japan 
and Nintendo of America, Inc. of Redmond, WA (collectively, 
``Nintendo'') as respondents.
    On August 21, 2009, Hillcrest and Nintendo jointly moved to 
terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. On August 
31, 2009, the Commission investigative attorney supported the motion.
    On September 8, 2009, the presiding administrative law judge issued 
the subject ID terminating the investigation. No petitions for review 
of this ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
    Issued: September 28, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-23665 Filed 9-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P