National Assessment Governing Board; Public Hearings, 49869-49871 [E9-23467]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 29, 2009 / Notices
Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Director,
Information Collection Clearance
Division, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: September 23, 2009.
Angela C. Arrington,
Director, Information Collection Clearance
Division, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services
Type of Review: Revision.
Title: Report on IDEA part B
Maintenance of Effort Reduction and
Coordinated Early Intervening Services.
Frequency: Annually.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 60.
Burden Hours: 1,032,480.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:18 Sep 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Abstract: This package provides
instructions and forms necessary for
States to report the provisions of
coordinated early intervening services
(CEIS) and maintenance of effort (MOE)
reduction in IDEA. The form satisfies
reporting requirements and is used by
OSEP to monitor SEAs and for
Congressional reporting.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 4146. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to 202–401–0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E9–23444 Filed 9–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Assessment Governing
Board; Public Hearings
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Education,
National Assessment Governing Board.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing.
SUMMARY: The National Assessment
Governing Board is announcing a public
hearing on November 9, 2009 to obtain
comment on expert panel
recommendations on uniform national
rules for testing of Students with
Disabilities (SD) and English Language
Learners (ELL) on the National
Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP).
Public and private parties and
organizations are invited to present
written and/or oral testimony. The
hearing will be held in the Phoenix Park
Hotel, 520 North Capitol Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20001 from 9:30 a.m. to
3 p.m. EST.
This notice sets forth the schedule
and proposed agenda of a forthcoming
public hearing of the National
Assessment Governing Board. This
notice also describes the functions of
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49869
the Board. Notice of this meeting is
required under Section 10(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act. This
document is intended to notify members
of the general public of their
opportunity to provide comment.
Individuals who will need special
accommodations in order to attend the
hearing (such as interpreting services,
assistive listening devices, materials in
alternative format) should notify Munira
Mwalimu at 202–357–6938 or at
Munira.Mwalimu@ed.gov no later than
November 4, 2009. We will attempt to
meet requests after this date, but cannot
guarantee availability of the requested
accommodation. The meeting site is
accessible to individuals with
disabilities.
DATES: November 9, 2009.
Location: Phoenix Park Hotel, 520
North Capitol Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20001. The hotel may be reached via
the Union Station Metro.
Time: 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. EST.
Background
Under Public Law 107–279, the
National Assessment Governing Board
(NAGB) is responsible for determining
the content and methodology of the
National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP). The assessment is
required to provide a fair and accurate
measurement of student academic
achievement through a random
sampling process that produces
representative data for the nation, the
States, and other participating
jurisdictions.
Despite changes in policy during the
past decade, variations in inclusion and
accommodation rates continue for
students with disabilities and English
language learners among States and
urban districts participating in the
National Assessment. These
differences—both between jurisdictions
and over time—continue to prompt
concern about the fairness and
comparability of NAEP results.
The Governing Board has established
an Ad Hoc Committee of Board
members to conduct a comprehensive
examination of NAEP testing and
reporting of these two student groups.
The Committee appointed two technical
advisory panels to recommend uniform
national rules for NAEP testing of SD
and ELL students to better assure that
NAEP samples are fully representative
and produce comparable results. These
panels reported to the Board at its
meeting on August 6 and 7, 2009. The
Board plans to consult widely before
deciding whether or not to adopt the
expert panel recommendations.
The reports and recommendations
being considered are available under
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
49870
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 29, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
supplementary information in this
notice and on the website of the
Governing Board at https://
www.nagb.org. Other related material on
the Governing Board and NAEP may be
found at this Web site and at https://
www.nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.
The Board is seeking comment from
policymakers, teachers, researchers,
State and local school administrators,
specialists in SD and ELL students,
parents of children in elementary and
secondary schools, representatives of
interested organizations, and members
of the public. Representatives of the
Governing Board will conduct the
hearing to receive testimony, and may
ask clarifying questions or respond to
presentations. Oral presentations should
not exceed ten minutes. Testimony will
become part of the public record.
All views will be considered by the
Ad Hoc Committee and the full Board.
It is anticipated that the Committee will
make recommendations to the
Governing Board at the Governing Board
meetings on November 19–21, 2009 and
March 4–6, 2010.
To register to present oral testimony
on November 9, 2009 at the Phoenix
Park Hotel in Washington, DC, please
call Tessa Regis, of the National
Assessment Governing Board staff, at
202–357–7500 or send an e-mail to
tessa.regis@ed.gov by 4 p.m. (Eastern
Time) on Friday, November 6, 2009.
Written testimony should be sent by
mail, fax or e-mail for receipt in the
Board office by November 10, 2009.
The Board will make an effort to hear
testimony from all persons who wish to
address it at the hearing without prior
registration. Speakers are encouraged to
bring written statements for distribution
at the hearing.
Testimony should be sent to: National
Assessment Governing Board, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW. — Suite 825,
Washington, DC 20002, Attention: Tessa
Regis, FAX: (202) 357–6945, E-mail:
tessa.regis@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tessa Regis or Lawrence Feinberg,
National Assessment Governing Board,
800 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite
825, Washington, DC 20002–4233,
Telephone: (202) 357–6938.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Assessment Governing Board
is established under section 412 of the
National Education Statistics Act of
1994, as amended. The Board
formulates policy guidelines for the
National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP). The Board’s
responsibilities include selecting subject
areas to be assessed, developing
assessment specifications and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:18 Sep 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
frameworks, designing the methodology
of the assessment, developing
appropriate student achievement levels
for each grade and subject tested,
developing standards and procedures
for interstate and national comparisons,
developing guidelines for reporting and
disseminating results, and releasing
initial NAEP results to the public.
The expert panel recommendations
being considered by the Governing
Board are summarized below. They are
not mutually exclusive. Some could go
into effect quickly while others would
be for medium-term or long-range
implementation. NAEP is a
representative-sample survey, designed
to produce valid, comparable data on
the academic achievement of large
groups of students. It is prohibited by
law from providing results for
individual children or schools. The
recommendations are being considered
because of concern that variations in
exclusion and accommodation practices
may jeopardize the fairness and
comparability of NAEP results.
The recommendations on which
public comment is sought are
summarized as follows:
By Expert Panel on Uniform National
Rules for NAEP Testing of Students
With Disabilities
(1) Encourage as many students as
possible to participate in NAEP, and
provide for the use of allowable
accommodations that are necessary to
enable students with disabilities to
participate.
(2) Clarify and expand NAEP’s
guidance to schools, encouraging
maximum participation of students with
disabilities so at least 95 percent of
those drawn for the NAEP sample
participate.
(3) Report separately on students who
have individualized education programs
(IEPs) and those with Section 504 plans,
but (except to maintain trend) only
count the students with IEPs as students
with disabilities.
(4) Provide incentives for schools to
include students with disabilities,
including additional outreach and
public reporting of participation rates
below 95 percent of students with
disabilities.
(5) Support research efforts to develop
targeted testing for students at both the
top and bottom levels of achievement,
with sound procedures to identify
students to receive targeted test booklets
on the basis of their performance on
some standard indicator of achievement.
(6) Encourage and review research on
the identification and progress of
students who have a significant
cognitive disability but in the short term
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
do not test this 1% of students on
NAEP.
(7) Assess the English language
proficiency of students with disabilities
who are English language learners and
are drawn for the NAEP sample and
provide linguistically appropriate
accommodations for those who need
them before determining whether
additional accommodations may be
needed to address any disabilities those
students may have.
By Expert Panel on Uniform National
Rules for NAEP Testing of English
Language Learners
(1) ELLs in all States and districts
selected for the NAEP sample who have
been in United States schools for one
year or more should be included in the
National Assessment. This policy
should be implemented with the
disaggregated reporting of ELL test
results by detailed information on
students’ English language proficiency
and the availability of accommodations
that maximize meaningful participation.
(2) Students should be offered ELLresponsive accommodations that
maintain the constructs in the NAEP
framework, including items and
directions in plain language, side-byside bilingual Spanish-English test
booklets, word-to-word bilingual
glossaries without definitions, as well as
other accommodations currently
allowed by NAEP. The accommodations
for each student should be selected at
the local level by school personnel who
are qualified to make judgments
regarding the inclusion of the ELL in
NAEP, including knowledge of his or
her level of English language
proficiency.
(3) NAEP results for ELL students
should be disaggregated and reported by
the best available standardized
assessment data on the level of English
language proficiency.
(4) To attain comparable participation
rates across States and districts, special
efforts should be made to inform and
solicit the cooperation of State and local
officials who decide upon the
participation of individual students,
including joint planning sessions and
targeted information sharing. A high
common goal for 95 percent or more of
ELL students sampled to participate
should be established.
(5) NAEP should adopt an aggressive
timeline for innovation and research,
including (a) the development of test
items written in plain language; (b) a
short test of English language
proficiency; (c) targeted testing with
blocks of items at low and high levels
of difficulty; and (d) computerized
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 29, 2009 / Notices
administration of the assessment when
feasible.
The full reports and recommendations
of the technical advisory panels are
available at https://nagb.org/newsroom/
PressReleasePDFs/SD–Panel-Report.pdf
and https://nagb.org/newsroom/
PressReleasePDFs/ELL–PanelReport.pdf. PowerPoint summaries are
available at https://nagb.org/newsroom/
PressReleasePDFs/PPt-SD–PanelReport.pdf and https://nagb.org/
newsroom/PressReleasePDFs/PPt-ELL–
Panel-Report.pdf.
A detailed summary of the hearing
that is informative to the public and
consistent with the policy of section 5
U.S.C. 552b(c) will be available to the
public within 14 days of the meeting.
Records are kept of all Board
proceedings and are available for public
inspection at the U.S. Department of
Education, National Assessment
Governing Board, Suite #825, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC,
from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister/. To use PDF you
must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,
which is available free at this site. If you
have questions about using PDF, call the
U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO),
toll free at 1–888–293–6498; or in the
Washington, DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: September 24, 2009.
Cornelia S. Orr,
Executive Director, National Assessment
Governing Board, U. S. Department of
Education.
[FR Doc. E9–23467 Filed 9–28–09; 8:45 am]
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:18 Sep 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP09–465–000]
Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice
of Application
September 22, 2009.
Take notice that on September 14,
2009, Northern Natural Gas Company
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street,
Omaha, Nebraska 68124, filed with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
an application under Section 7 of the
Natural Gas Act to expand the existing
certificated storage boundary of the
Cunningham storage field located in
Pratt and Kingman counties, Kansas, to
include the Viola and Simpson
formations in the Extension Area
(including Northern’s acquisition of all
property interests), all as more fully set
forth in the request which is on file with
the Commission and open to public
inspection.
In its application, Northern asserts the
need to acquire additional storage acres
to control and mitigate storage gas
migration from the Cunningham storage
field that is occurring to the north of
Northern’s existing certificated storage
boundary.
Any questions regarding this
application should be directed to
Michael T. Loeffler, Senior Director of
Certificates and External Affairs for
Northern, 1111 South 103rd Street,
Omaha, Nebraska 68124, (402) 398–
7103; or Bret Fritch, Senior Regulatory
Analyst, at (402) 398–7140.
The filing is available for review at
the Commission in the Public Reference
Room or may be viewed on the
Commission’s Web site Web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupport@gerc.gov or call
toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TYY, (202)
502–8659.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49871
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of filings made in the
proceeding with the Commission and
must mail a copy to the applicant and
to every other party. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commentors
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests
and interventions in lieu of paper using
the eFiling link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary
link and is available for review in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room in
Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that
enables subscribers to receive e-mail
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49869-49871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23467]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Assessment Governing Board; Public Hearings
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Education, National Assessment Governing
Board.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Assessment Governing Board is announcing a public
hearing on November 9, 2009 to obtain comment on expert panel
recommendations on uniform national rules for testing of Students with
Disabilities (SD) and English Language Learners (ELL) on the National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
Public and private parties and organizations are invited to present
written and/or oral testimony. The hearing will be held in the Phoenix
Park Hotel, 520 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001 from
9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. EST.
This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a
forthcoming public hearing of the National Assessment Governing Board.
This notice also describes the functions of the Board. Notice of this
meeting is required under Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act. This document is intended to notify members of the
general public of their opportunity to provide comment. Individuals who
will need special accommodations in order to attend the hearing (such
as interpreting services, assistive listening devices, materials in
alternative format) should notify Munira Mwalimu at 202-357-6938 or at
Munira.Mwalimu@ed.gov no later than November 4, 2009. We will attempt
to meet requests after this date, but cannot guarantee availability of
the requested accommodation. The meeting site is accessible to
individuals with disabilities.
DATES: November 9, 2009.
Location: Phoenix Park Hotel, 520 North Capitol Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20001. The hotel may be reached via the Union Station
Metro.
Time: 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. EST.
Background
Under Public Law 107-279, the National Assessment Governing Board
(NAGB) is responsible for determining the content and methodology of
the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The assessment
is required to provide a fair and accurate measurement of student
academic achievement through a random sampling process that produces
representative data for the nation, the States, and other participating
jurisdictions.
Despite changes in policy during the past decade, variations in
inclusion and accommodation rates continue for students with
disabilities and English language learners among States and urban
districts participating in the National Assessment. These differences--
both between jurisdictions and over time--continue to prompt concern
about the fairness and comparability of NAEP results.
The Governing Board has established an Ad Hoc Committee of Board
members to conduct a comprehensive examination of NAEP testing and
reporting of these two student groups. The Committee appointed two
technical advisory panels to recommend uniform national rules for NAEP
testing of SD and ELL students to better assure that NAEP samples are
fully representative and produce comparable results. These panels
reported to the Board at its meeting on August 6 and 7, 2009. The Board
plans to consult widely before deciding whether or not to adopt the
expert panel recommendations.
The reports and recommendations being considered are available
under
[[Page 49870]]
supplementary information in this notice and on the website of the
Governing Board at https://www.nagb.org. Other related material on the
Governing Board and NAEP may be found at this Web site and at https://www.nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.
The Board is seeking comment from policymakers, teachers,
researchers, State and local school administrators, specialists in SD
and ELL students, parents of children in elementary and secondary
schools, representatives of interested organizations, and members of
the public. Representatives of the Governing Board will conduct the
hearing to receive testimony, and may ask clarifying questions or
respond to presentations. Oral presentations should not exceed ten
minutes. Testimony will become part of the public record.
All views will be considered by the Ad Hoc Committee and the full
Board. It is anticipated that the Committee will make recommendations
to the Governing Board at the Governing Board meetings on November 19-
21, 2009 and March 4-6, 2010.
To register to present oral testimony on November 9, 2009 at the
Phoenix Park Hotel in Washington, DC, please call Tessa Regis, of the
National Assessment Governing Board staff, at 202-357-7500 or send an
e-mail to tessa.regis@ed.gov by 4 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Friday,
November 6, 2009. Written testimony should be sent by mail, fax or e-
mail for receipt in the Board office by November 10, 2009.
The Board will make an effort to hear testimony from all persons
who wish to address it at the hearing without prior registration.
Speakers are encouraged to bring written statements for distribution at
the hearing.
Testimony should be sent to: National Assessment Governing Board,
800 North Capitol Street, NW. -- Suite 825, Washington, DC 20002,
Attention: Tessa Regis, FAX: (202) 357-6945, E-mail:
tessa.regis@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tessa Regis or Lawrence Feinberg,
National Assessment Governing Board, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
Suite 825, Washington, DC 20002-4233, Telephone: (202) 357-6938.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Assessment Governing Board is
established under section 412 of the National Education Statistics Act
of 1994, as amended. The Board formulates policy guidelines for the
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The Board's
responsibilities include selecting subject areas to be assessed,
developing assessment specifications and frameworks, designing the
methodology of the assessment, developing appropriate student
achievement levels for each grade and subject tested, developing
standards and procedures for interstate and national comparisons,
developing guidelines for reporting and disseminating results, and
releasing initial NAEP results to the public.
The expert panel recommendations being considered by the Governing
Board are summarized below. They are not mutually exclusive. Some could
go into effect quickly while others would be for medium-term or long-
range implementation. NAEP is a representative-sample survey, designed
to produce valid, comparable data on the academic achievement of large
groups of students. It is prohibited by law from providing results for
individual children or schools. The recommendations are being
considered because of concern that variations in exclusion and
accommodation practices may jeopardize the fairness and comparability
of NAEP results.
The recommendations on which public comment is sought are
summarized as follows:
By Expert Panel on Uniform National Rules for NAEP Testing of Students
With Disabilities
(1) Encourage as many students as possible to participate in NAEP,
and provide for the use of allowable accommodations that are necessary
to enable students with disabilities to participate.
(2) Clarify and expand NAEP's guidance to schools, encouraging
maximum participation of students with disabilities so at least 95
percent of those drawn for the NAEP sample participate.
(3) Report separately on students who have individualized education
programs (IEPs) and those with Section 504 plans, but (except to
maintain trend) only count the students with IEPs as students with
disabilities.
(4) Provide incentives for schools to include students with
disabilities, including additional outreach and public reporting of
participation rates below 95 percent of students with disabilities.
(5) Support research efforts to develop targeted testing for
students at both the top and bottom levels of achievement, with sound
procedures to identify students to receive targeted test booklets on
the basis of their performance on some standard indicator of
achievement.
(6) Encourage and review research on the identification and
progress of students who have a significant cognitive disability but in
the short term do not test this 1% of students on NAEP.
(7) Assess the English language proficiency of students with
disabilities who are English language learners and are drawn for the
NAEP sample and provide linguistically appropriate accommodations for
those who need them before determining whether additional
accommodations may be needed to address any disabilities those students
may have.
By Expert Panel on Uniform National Rules for NAEP Testing of English
Language Learners
(1) ELLs in all States and districts selected for the NAEP sample
who have been in United States schools for one year or more should be
included in the National Assessment. This policy should be implemented
with the disaggregated reporting of ELL test results by detailed
information on students' English language proficiency and the
availability of accommodations that maximize meaningful participation.
(2) Students should be offered ELL-responsive accommodations that
maintain the constructs in the NAEP framework, including items and
directions in plain language, side-by-side bilingual Spanish-English
test booklets, word-to-word bilingual glossaries without definitions,
as well as other accommodations currently allowed by NAEP. The
accommodations for each student should be selected at the local level
by school personnel who are qualified to make judgments regarding the
inclusion of the ELL in NAEP, including knowledge of his or her level
of English language proficiency.
(3) NAEP results for ELL students should be disaggregated and
reported by the best available standardized assessment data on the
level of English language proficiency.
(4) To attain comparable participation rates across States and
districts, special efforts should be made to inform and solicit the
cooperation of State and local officials who decide upon the
participation of individual students, including joint planning sessions
and targeted information sharing. A high common goal for 95 percent or
more of ELL students sampled to participate should be established.
(5) NAEP should adopt an aggressive timeline for innovation and
research, including (a) the development of test items written in plain
language; (b) a short test of English language proficiency; (c)
targeted testing with blocks of items at low and high levels of
difficulty; and (d) computerized
[[Page 49871]]
administration of the assessment when feasible.
The full reports and recommendations of the technical advisory
panels are available at https://nagb.org/newsroom/PressReleasePDFs/SD-Panel-Report.pdf and https://nagb.org/newsroom/PressReleasePDFs/ELL-Panel-Report.pdf. PowerPoint summaries are available at https://nagb.org/newsroom/PressReleasePDFs/PPt-SD-Panel-Report.pdf and https://nagb.org/newsroom/PressReleasePDFs/PPt-ELL-Panel-Report.pdf.
A detailed summary of the hearing that is informative to the public
and consistent with the policy of section 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) will be
available to the public within 14 days of the meeting. Records are kept
of all Board proceedings and are available for public inspection at the
U.S. Department of Education, National Assessment Governing Board,
Suite 825, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC, from
9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
Electronic Access to This Document: You may view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister/. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF,
call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free at 1-888-293-
6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: September 24, 2009.
Cornelia S. Orr,
Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board, U. S.
Department of Education.
[FR Doc. E9-23467 Filed 9-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P