Grant of Individual Exemptions and Prohibited Transaction Exemptions Involving: M&T Bank Corporation Pension Plan, PTE 2009-26; Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, PTE 2009-27; and Ford Motor Company and Its Affiliates (Collectively, Ford), PTE 2009-28, 49034-49040 [E9-23167]
Download as PDF
49034
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
securities and that the methodology was
reasonably applied.
24. According to the Applicant, the
Sale and Cash Infusion were intended to
protect the plans and their participants
by increasing the assets available to
meet benefit payment obligations and
redemption requests and by reducing
certain risks inherent in each Account’s
portfolio resulting from market
conditions, thereby eliminating or
reducing the Wrap Providers’ incentives
to exercise their contractual termination
or immunization rights. State Street
represents that it took all appropriate
actions necessary to safeguard the
interests of each Account and each
employee benefit plan with a direct or
indirect interest in an Account.
25. In summary, the Applicant
represents that the statutory criteria of
section 408(a) of the Act and section
4975 of the Code are satisfied because:
(a) The exemption is administratively
feasible, as the transaction is already
completed and all relevant details have
been fully disclosed;
(b) The transaction, if covered by an
exemption, is in the interest of the
participating plans and their
participants and beneficiaries because
the transaction will reduce the
likelihood that the Wrap Providers will
exercise their immunization and
termination rights, which would
adversely affect the plans and their
participants;
(c) The exemption is protective of the
rights of participants and beneficiaries
of the plans, because: (i) The assets sold
were identified for disposition in arm’s
length negotiations between State Street
and two bidders for the acquisition of
State Street’s stable value business, (ii)
independent pricing services were used
to value and price the assets sold to
State Street, and (iii) no commissions or
transaction costs were charged in
connection with the sale of the assets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen E. Lloyd of the Department, at
(202) 693–8554. This is not a toll-free
number.
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which, among other things,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Sep 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be
granted under section 408(a) of the Act
and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code,
the Department must find that the
exemption is administratively feasible,
in the interests of the plan and of its
participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be supplemental to, and
not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transitional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in each
application are true and complete, and
that each application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
September, 2009.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E9–23168 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Grant of Individual Exemptions and
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions
Involving: M&T Bank Corporation
Pension Plan, PTE 2009–26; Bank of
New York Mellon Corporation, PTE
2009–27; and Ford Motor Company
and Its Affiliates (Collectively, Ford),
PTE 2009–28
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION:
PO 00000
Grant of individual exemptions.
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: This document contains
exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of
the prohibited transaction restrictions of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act)
and/or the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal
Register of the pendency before the
Department of a proposal to grant such
exemption. The notice set forth a
summary of facts and representations
contained in the application for
exemption and referred interested
persons to the application for a
complete statement of the facts and
representations. The application has
been available for public inspection at
the Department in Washington, DC. The
notice also invited interested persons to
submit comments on the requested
exemption to the Department. In
addition the notice stated that any
interested person might submit a
written request that a public hearing be
held (where appropriate). The applicant
has represented that it has complied
with the requirements of the notification
to interested persons. No requests for a
hearing were received by the
Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described
in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption
was issued and the exemption is being
granted solely by the Department
because, effective December 31, 1978,
section 102 of Reorganization Plan No.
4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996),
transferred the authority of the Secretary
of the Treasury to issue exemptions of
the type proposed to the Secretary of
Labor.
Statutory Findings
In accordance with section 408(a) of
the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and the procedures set forth in 29
CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes
the following findings:
(a) The exemption is administratively
feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests
of the plan and its participants and
beneficiaries; and
(c) The exemption is protective of the
rights of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan.
M&T Bank Corporation Pension Plan,
Located in Buffalo, NY.
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
2009–26
Exemption Application No. D–11470]
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices
Exemption
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Section I. Transactions
Effective January 18, 2007, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A)
through (D) and 406(b)(1) and (2) of the
Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A)
through (E) of the Code, shall not apply
to the in-kind redemptions (the
Redemptions) of shares (the Shares)
held by the M&T Bank Corporation
Pension Plan (the Plan) of the MTB Mid
Cap Growth Fund and the MTB Large
Cap Stock Fund (the Fund(s)) for which
affiliates of Manufacturers and Traders
Trust Company (M&T) provide
investment advisory services and other
services.
Section II. Conditions
This exemption is subject to the
following conditions:
(a) The Plan paid no sales
commissions, redemption fees, or other
similar fees in connection with the
Redemptions (other than customary
transfer charges paid to parties other
than M&T and affiliates of M&T (M&T
Affiliates).
(b) The assets transferable to the Plan
consisted of only cash and Transferable
Securities, as defined in Section III;
(c) With certain exceptions explained
in Representation 6 below, the Plan
received a pro rata portion of the
Transferable Securities, pursuant to the
Redemptions that, when added to the
cash received, was equal in value to the
number of Shares redeemed for such
Transferable Securities, as determined
in a single valuation (using sources
independent of M&T and M&T affiliates)
performed in the same manner and as of
the close of business on the same day as
the day of the Redemptions, in
accordance with Rule 2a–4 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended from time to time (the 1940
Act), and the then-existing procedures
established by the Fund that are in
compliance with the 1940 Act, and the
Plan received the Transferable
Securities on the next business day
following the date of the Redemptions;
(d) Neither M&T nor any M&T
Affiliate received any fees, including
any fees payable pursuant to Rule 12b–
1 under the 1940 Act, in connection
with the Redemptions;
(e) M&T retained an Independent
Fiduciary, as such term is defined in
Section III. The Independent Fiduciary
determined that the terms of the
Redemptions were fair to the
participants of the Plan and comparable
to and no less favorable than terms
obtainable at arm’s length between
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Sep 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
unaffiliated parties, and that the
Redemptions were in the best interest of
the Plan and its participants and
beneficiaries;
(f) M&T or the relevant Fund provided
to the Independent Fiduciary a written
confirmation regarding such
Redemptions containing:
(1) The number of Shares held by the
Plan immediately before the
Redemptions (and the related per Share
net asset value and the total dollar value
of the Shares held),
(2) the identity (and related aggregate
dollar value) of each Transferable
Security provided to the Plan at the time
of the Redemptions, including each
Transferable Security valued in
accordance with Rule 2a–4 under the
1940 Act and the then-existing
procedures established by the Fund
(using sources independent of M&T and
M&T Affiliates) for obtaining prices
from independent pricing services or
market-makers,
(3) the market price of each
Transferable Security received by the
Plan at the time of the Redemptions,
and
(4) the identity of each pricing service
or market-marker consulted in
determining the value of each
Transferable Security at the time of the
Redemptions.
(g) The value of the Transferable
Securities and cash received by the Plan
for each redeemed Share equaled the net
asset value of such Share at the time of
the transaction, and such value equaled
the value that would have been received
by any other investor for shares of the
same class of the Fund at the time;
(h) For a period of six months
following the Redemptions, MTB
Investment Advisors (MTBIA), an M&T
Affiliate and the investment advisor to
the MTB Group of Funds (MTB Funds)
reimbursed the Plan for commissions
and fees incurred in connection with
Transferable Securities received as a
result of the Redemptions and
subsequently sold;
(i) Following the Redemptions, M&T,
on behalf of the Plan, has paid and will
continue to pay investment management
fees for the Plan’s investment in the
separate accounts so long as MTBIA
serves as the investment manager for the
Plan;
(j) Subsequent to the Redemptions,
the Independent Fiduciary performs a
post-transaction review that includes,
among other things, testing a sampling
of material aspects of the Redemptions
deemed in its judgment to be
representative, including pricing;
(k) M&T maintains, or causes to be
maintained, for a period of six years
from the date the Redemptions, such
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49035
records as are necessary to enable the
person described in paragraph (l)(1)
below to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption have been
met, except that
(1) if the records necessary to enable
the persons described in Section II(l)(1)
to determine whether the conditions of
this exemption have been met are lost,
or destroyed, due to circumstances
beyond the control of M&T, then no
prohibited transaction will be
considered to have occurred solely on
the basis of the unavailability of those
records; and
(2) no party in interest with respect to
the Plan other than M&T shall be subject
to the civil penalty that may be assessed
under section 502(i) of the Act or to the
taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b)
of the Code if such records are not
maintained or are not available for
examination as required by Section II(k).
(l)(1) Except as provided in this
Section II(l)(2) and notwithstanding any
provision of section 504(a)(2) and (b) of
the act, the records referred to in
Section II(k) are unconditionally
available at their customary locations
for examination during normal business
hours by:
(i) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the United States
Department of Labor (the Department),
the Internal Revenue Service, or the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
(ii) any fiduciary of the Plan or any
duly authorized representative of such
participant or beneficiary,
(iii) any participant or beneficiary of
the Plan or duly authorized
representative of such participant or
beneficiary,
(iv) any employer whose employees
are covered by the Plan, and
(v) any employee organization whose
members are covered by such Plan;
(2) None of the persons described in
Section II(l)(1)(ii) through (v) shall be
authorized to examine trade secrets of
M&T, the Funds, or the investment
advisor for the Funds, or commercial or
financial information which is
privileged or confidential; and
(3) Should M&T, the Funds, or the
investment advisor for the Funds refuse
to disclose information on the basis that
such information is exempt from
disclosure pursuant to Section II(l)(2)
above, M&T, the Funds, or the
investment advisor shall, by the close of
the 30th day following the request,
provide a written notice advising that
person of the reasons for the refusal and
that the Department may request such
information.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
49036
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Section III—Definitions
For purposes of this proposed
exemption,
(a) The term ‘‘M & T’’ means
Manufacturers and Traders Trust
Company which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the M&T Bank
Corporation.
(b) The term ‘‘affiliate’’ means:
(1) Any person (including a
corporation or partnership) directly or
indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with the
person;
(2) Any officer, director, employee, or
partner in any such person; and
(3) Any corporation or partnership of
which such person is an officer,
director, partner, or employee.
(c) The term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual.
(d) The term ‘‘net asset value’’ means
the amount for purposes of pricing all
purchases and sales calculated by
dividing the value of securities,
determined by a method as set forth in
the Fund’s prospectus and statement of
additional information, and other assets
belonging to the Fund, less the
liabilities charged to each such
Portfolio, by the number of outstanding
shares.
(e) The term ‘‘Independent Fiduciary’’
means a fiduciary who is:
(1) Independent of and unrelated to
M&T and its affiliates, and
(2) Appointed to act on behalf of the
Plan with respect to the Redemptions.
For purposes of this exemption, a
fiduciary will not be deemed to be
independent of and unrelated to M&T if:
(3) Such fiduciary directly or
indirectly controls, is controlled by or is
under common control with M&T;
(4) Such fiduciary, directly or
indirectly receives any compensation or
other consideration in connection with
any transaction described in this
exemption (except that an independent
fiduciary may receive compensation
from M&T in connection with the
transactions discussed herein if the
amount or payment of such
compensation is not contingent upon or
in any way affected by the independent
fiduciary’s ultimate decision); or
(5) Such fiduciary receives, in its
current fiscal year, from M&T or its
affiliates, an amount that would have
exceeded one percent (1%) of such
fiduciary’s gross income in the prior
fiscal year.
(f) The term ‘‘Transferable Securities’’
shall mean securities
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Sep 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
(1) For which market quotations are
readily available from persons
independent of M&T as determined
pursuant to procedures established by
the Funds under Rule 2a–4 of the 1940
Act; and
(2) Which are not:
(i) Securities which, if publicly
offered or sold, would require
registration under the Securities Act of
1933;
(ii) Securities issued by entities in
countries which (A) restrict or prohibit
the holding of securities by nonnationals other than through qualified
investment vehicles, such as the Funds,
or (B) permit transfers of ownership of
securities to be effected only by
transactions conducted on a local stock
exchange;
(iii) Certain portfolio positions (such
as forward foreign currency contracts,
futures and options contracts, swap
transactions, certificates of deposit and
repurchase agreements) that, although
they may be liquid and marketable,
involve the assumption of contractual
obligations, require trading facilities or
can only be traded with the counterparty to the transaction to effect a
change in beneficial ownership;
(iv) Cash equivalents (such as
certificates of deposit, commercial paper
and repurchase agreements);
(v) Other assets which are not readily
distributable (including receivables and
prepaid expenses), net of all liabilities
(including accounts payable); and
(vi) Securities subject to ‘‘stop
transfer’’ instructions or similar
contractual restrictions on transfer.
Effective Date: This exemption is
effective as of the date of this grant.
Written Comments
In the Notice of Proposed Exemption
(the Notice), the Department invited all
interested persons to submit written
comments and requests for a hearing.
During the comment period, the
Department received no requests for a
hearing. The Department did receive a
comment from the Applicant dated May
1, 2009. The Applicant cited several
issues with regard to the Notice as
follows.
1) Section II(c) of the Notice reads as
follows:
With certain exceptions explained in
Representation 6 below, the Plan received a
pro rata portion of the Transferable
Securities, pursuant to the Redemptions that,
when added to the cash received, was equal
in value to the number of Shares redeemed
for such Transferable Securities, as
determined in a single valuation (using
sources independent of M&T and M&T
affiliates) performed in the same manner and
as of the close of business on the same day
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
as the day of receipt of the Transferable
Securities, in accordance with Rule 2a–4
under the Investment Company Act of 1940,
as amended from time to time (the 1940 Act),
and the then-existing procedures established
by the Fund that are in compliance the 1940
Act;
The Applicant explains that the
valuation described in section II(c) of
the Notice and the actual receipt of the
Transferable Securities by the Plan
could have occurred on different days.
The Applicant represents that although
the valuation occurred on the same day
as the date of the Redemptions, the
actual receipt of the Transferable
Securities by the Plan occurred on the
next business day following the date of
the Redemptions. Based on the
Applicant’s clarification, the
Department has determined to amend
the language of section II(c) as follows:
With certain exceptions explained in
Representation 6 below, the Plan received a
pro rata portion of the Transferable
Securities, pursuant to the Redemptions that,
when added to the cash received, was equal
in value to the number of Shares redeemed
for such Transferable Securities, as
determined in a single valuation (using
sources independent of M&T and M&T
affiliates) performed in the same manner and
as of the close of business on the same day
as the day of the Redemptions, in accordance
with Rule 2a–4 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended from time
to time (the 1940 Act), and the then-existing
procedures established by the Fund that are
in compliance the 1940 Act, and the Plan
received the Transferable Securities on the
next business day following the date of the
Redemptions;
2) The Applicant requested that
section II(i) and subparagraph (e) of
Paragraph 15 of the Summary of Facts
and Representations of the Notice
should be deleted. The condition set
forth in Section II(i) of the Notice and
subparagraph (e) of Paragraph 15 reads
as follows:
Following the Redemptions, M&T, on
behalf of the Plan, has paid and will continue
to pay total annual expenses, including
investment management fees for the Plan’s
investment in the separate accounts;
In addition, the subparagraph (d) of
Paragraph 14 of the Summary of Facts
and Representations of the Notice reads
as follows:
The Plan will no longer pay investment
management fees with respect to its
investment in the separate accounts charged
by MTBIA.
The Applicant clarified its application
to indicate that it intended to pay only
investment management fees on behalf
of the Plan’s investment in the M&T
separate accounts. In this regard,
Evercore Trust Company, N.A.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices
(Evercore), the independent fiduciary
and the successor of U.S. Trust
Company, stated in a June 9, 2009 letter
to the Department that the Funds’ total
annual expenses include certain
expenses that have no clear counterpart
when assets are separately managed
(e.g., transfer agency fees, custody fees,
shareholder servicing fees). The only
fees specifically associated with a
separately managed arrangement are the
manager’s investment management fees.
Given that M&T has agreed to pay for
the investment management fees
associated with the separate accounts, it
is therefore consistent to describer the
Plan’s on-going savings as the Fund’s
total annual expenses.
The Applicant also clarified its
application to indicate that it did not
intend to absorb permanently the
investment management costs
associated with the separate accounts on
behalf of the Plan. The Applicant
represents that if the Plan should cease
using MTBIA and hire an investment
manager unaffiliated with the
Applicant, the Applicant may at that
time cease paying the investment
management fees.
The Department has revised section
II(i) of the Notice to read as follows:
Following the Redemptions, M&T, on
behalf of the Plan, has paid and will continue
to pay investment management fees for the
Plan’s investment in the separate accounts so
long as MTBIA serves as the investment
manager for the Plan;
In addition, subparagraph (d) of
Paragraph 14 and subparagraph (e) of
Paragraph 15 of the Summary of Facts
and Representations in the Notice
should read as follows:
Following the Redemptions, M&T, on
behalf of the Plan, has paid and will continue
to pay investment management fees for the
Plan’s investment in the separate accounts so
long as MTBIA serves as the investment
manager for the Plan;
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
3) The Applicant requests that the
language contained in paragraph 2 of
the Summary of Facts and
Representations in the Notice be
revised, in order to reflect the fact that
M&T manages Plan investments and
does not manage the Plan itself.
Paragraph 2 of the Summary of Facts
and Representations in the Notice reads
as follows:
‘‘M&T serves as trustee of the Plan and
manages the Plan.’’
The Department concurs with the
Applicant’s suggested revision. In this
regard, the last sentence of paragraph 2
of the Summary of Facts and
Representations, as set forth in the
Notice, should read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Sep 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
‘‘M&T serves as trustee of the Plan and
manages the Plan’s investments.’’
(4) The Applicant requested that the
second sentence of paragraph 5 of the
Summary of Facts and Representations
in the Notice be clarified. The second
sentence of Paragraph 5 of the Summary
of Facts and Representations in the
Notice reads as follows:
M&T determined that the Plan’s
investments in the Funds were large enough
so that an all-cash redemption would
adversely impact the Funds and to proceed
with the Redemptions.
The Applicant represents that
specifically, it was the board of the MTB
Funds that determined that an all-cash
redemption would adversely impact the
MTB Funds.
The Department concurs with the
Applicant’s suggested revisions. In this
regard, the second sentence of
paragraph 5 of the Summary of Facts
and Representations, as set forth in the
Notice is revised to read as follows:
The board of the MTB Funds determined
that the Plan’s investments in the Funds were
large enough so that an all-cash redemption
would adversely impact the Funds and to
proceed with the Redemptions.
(5) The Applicant requested a
clarification of the word ‘‘it’’ which
should have read the ‘‘MTB Funds’’ in
the third sentence of footnote 9 of the
Summary of Facts and Representations.
The third sentence of footnote 9 of the
Summary of Facts and Representations
in the Notice reads as follows:
M&T represents it has adopted procedures
in accordance with the Signature Financial
Letter for use in affiliated transactions, and
those procedures must be followed for
transactions with the Plan, as the Plan is
treated as an affiliate under the 1940 Act of
the funds whose shares are being redeemed.
The Department concurs with the
Applicant’s suggested revisions. In this
regard, the third sentence of footnote 9
of the Summary of Facts and
Representations in the Notice is
amended to read as follows:
M&T represents that the MTB Funds have
adopted procedures in accordance with the
Signature Financial Letter for use in affiliated
transactions, and those procedures must be
followed for transactions with the Plan, as
the Plan is treated as an affiliate under the
1940 Act of the funds whose shares are being
redeemed.
After reviewing the entire record,
including the comments submitted, the
Department has decided to grant this
exemption as revised herein. For a more
complete statement of the facts and
representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption refer to the Notice published
on February 25, 2009, 74 FR 8576.
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49037
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anh-Viet Ly of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8648. (This is not
a toll-free number).
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation,
Located in Pittsburgh, PA.
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
2009–27
[Application No. D–11553]
Exemption
The restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(A) through (D), 406(b)(1) and
406(b)(2) of the Act and the sanctions
resulting from the application of section
4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code,1
shall not apply, effective November 25,
2008, to the cash sale of certain
securities (the Securities) issued by
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. or its
affiliates (Lehman) for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately
$5,512,395 by the EB SMAM Securities
Lending Temporary Investment Fund
(the Cash Collateral Fund) to the Bank
of New York Mellon Corporation
(BNYMC), a party in interest with
respect to the employee benefit plans
(the Plan(s)) invested, directly or
indirectly, in the Cash Collateral Fund;
provided that the following conditions
are met:
(a) The sale of the Securities was a
one-time transaction for cash;
(b) The Cash Collateral Fund received
an amount for the sale of the Securities
which was equal to the sum of:
(1) The amortized cost of the
Securities, and
(2) The accrued but unpaid interest on
each of the Securities, determined as of
the earlier of: (A) The date of the sale
of the Securities, or (B) the maturity
date of each of the Securities;
(c) The amount received by the Cash
Collateral Fund for the sale of the
Securities was greater than the aggregate
market value of the Securities at the
time of the sale, as determined based on
information regarding the then
prevailing trading prices for the
Securities obtained from two
independent broker-dealers;
(d) The Cash Collateral Fund did not
bear any commissions, fees, transactions
costs, or other expenses in connection
with the sale of the Securities;
(e) The Bank of New York Mellon
(BNY Mellon), as trustee of the Cash
Collateral Fund, determined that the
sale of the Securities was appropriate
for and in the best interest of the Cash
Collateral Fund, and the Plans invested,
1 For purposes of this exemption, references to
specific provisions of Title I of the Act, unless
otherwise specified, refer also to the corresponding
provisions of the Code.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
49038
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices
directly or indirectly, in the Cash
Collateral Fund, at the time of the
transaction;
(f) BNY Mellon took all appropriate
actions necessary to safeguard the
interests of the Cash Collateral Fund,
and the Plans invested, directly or
indirectly, in the Cash Collateral Fund,
in connection with the transaction,
given that Lehman had filed for
bankruptcy and that the value of the
Securities had declined substantially;
(g) If the exercise of any of BNYMC’s
rights, claims, or causes of action in
connection with its ownership of the
Securities results in BNYMC recovering
from Lehman, the issuer of the
Securities, or from any third party, an
aggregate amount that is more than the
sum of:
(1) The purchase price paid for such
Securities by BNYMC; and
(2) The interest due on the Securities
from and after the date BNYMC
purchased the Securities from the Cash
Collateral Fund, determined at the lastpublished interest rate on the Securities
preceding Lehman’s bankruptcy filing,
BNYMC will refund such excess amount
promptly to the Cash Collateral Fund
(after deducting all reasonable expenses
incurred in connection with the
recovery);
(h) BNY Mellon and its affiliates, as
applicable, maintain, or cause to be
maintained, for a period of six (6) years
from the date of the transaction such
records as are necessary to enable the
persons described, below, in paragraph
(i)(1), to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption have been
met, except that—
(1) No party in interest with respect
to a Plan which engages in the
transaction, other than BNY Mellon and
its affiliates, as applicable, shall be
subject to a civil penalty under section
502(i) of the Act or the taxes imposed
by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code,
if such records are not maintained, or
not available for examination, as
required, below, by paragraph (i)(1); and
(2) A separate prohibited transaction
shall not be considered to have occurred
solely because, due to circumstances
beyond the control of BNY Mellon and
its affiliates, as applicable, such records
are lost or destroyed prior to the end of
the six-year period.
(i)(1) Except as provided, below, in
paragraph (i)(2), and notwithstanding
any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and
(b) of section 504 of the Act, the records
referred to, above, in paragraph (h) are
unconditionally available at their
customary location for examination
during normal business hours by—
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department, the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Sep 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
Internal Revenue Service, or the
Securities and Exchange Commission;
or
(B) Any fiduciary of a Plan that
engages in the transaction, or any duly
authorized employee or representative
of such fiduciary; or
(C) Any employer of participants and
beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are
covered by a Plan that engages in the
transaction, or any authorized employee
or representative of these entities; or
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of
a Plan that engages in the transaction, or
duly authorized employee or
representative of such participant or
beneficiary;
(2) None of the persons described,
above, in paragraph (i)(1)(B)–(D) shall be
authorized to examine trade secrets of
BNY Mellon and its affiliates, as
applicable, or commercial or financial
information which is privileged or
confidential; and
(3) Should BNY Mellon and its
affiliates, as applicable, refuse to
disclose information on the basis that
such information is exempt from
disclosure, BNY Mellon and its
affiliates, as applicable, shall, by the
close of the thirtieth (30th) day
following the request, provide a written
notice advising that person of the
reasons for the refusal and that the
Department may request such
information.
Effective Date: This exemption is
effective, as of November 25, 2008.
After giving full consideration to the
entire record, the Department has
decided to grant the exemption, as
described above. The complete
application file is made available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, Room
N–1513, U. S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption refer to the Notice published
on July 23, 2009, at 74 FR 36515.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Angelena C. Le Blanc of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8540. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
Ford Motor Company and Its Affiliates,
(collectively, Ford)
Located in Detroit, MI.
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
2009–28 Application No. L–11451]
Exemption
Section I. Covered Transactions
The restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1), and
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
406(b)(2) of the Act shall not apply,
effective July 13, 2006, to: (1) monthly
cash advances to Ford by the
Independent Health Care Trust for UAW
Retirees of Ford Motor Company (the
DC VEBA), as defined in section III(f),
below, of this exemption, to reimburse
Ford for the estimated mitigation of
certain health care expenses (the
Mitigation), as defined in section III(h),
below, of this exemption, and during
the period from July 14, 2006 through
February 28, 2007, for the payment of
dental expenses incurred by
participants in the DC VEBA; and (2) an
annual ‘‘true-up’’ of the Mitigation
payments and dental expenses against
the actual expenses incurred, with the
result that: (a) if Ford has been
underpaid by the DC VEBA, Ford
receives the balance outstanding from
the DC VEBA with interest, or (b) if the
DC VEBA has overpaid Ford, Ford
reimburses the DC VEBA for the amount
overpaid, with interest.
Section II. Conditions
This exemption is conditioned upon
adherence to the material facts and
representations described in application
for exemption, and upon satisfaction of
the following conditions:
(a) A committee (the Committee), as
defined in section III(d), below, of this
exemption, acting as a fiduciary
independent of Ford, has represented
and will continue to represent the DC
VEBA and its participants and
beneficiaries for all purposes with
respect to the Mitigation process under
the settlement agreement (the DC VEBA
Settlement Agreement or the Settlement
Agreement), as defined in section III(g),
below, of this exemption.
(b) The Committee for the DC VEBA
has discharged and will continue to
discharge its duties consistent with the
terms of the DC VEBA and the
Settlement Agreement.
(c) The Committee and actuaries
retained by the Committee have
reviewed and approved and will
continue to review and approve the
estimation process involved in the
Mitigation, which results in the monthly
Mitigation amount paid to Ford.
(d) Outside auditors retained by the
Committee, along with an
administrative company that is partly
owned by the DC VEBA, have audited
and will audit the calculation of the
true-up to determine whether there are
any differences between the estimated
Mitigation and actual Mitigation
amounts and have made and will make
such information available to Ford.
(e) Ford has provided various reports
and records to the Committee
concerning dental care reimbursements
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices
for the period from July 14, 2006,
through February 28, 2007, which were
subject to review and audit by the
Committee, and Ford has provided and
will continue to provide various reports
and records to the Committee
concerning the Mitigation required
under the Settlement Agreement which
were and will continue to be subject to
review and audit by the Committee.
(f) The terms of the covered
transactions are no less favorable and
will continue to be no less favorable to
the DC VEBA than the terms negotiated
at arm’s length under similar
circumstances between unrelated third
parties.
(g) The interest rate applied to any
true-up payments is a reasonable rate, as
set forth in the DC VEBA Settlement
Agreement, and will continue to be a
reasonable rate that runs from the
beginning of the year being trued up and
does not and will not present a windfall
or detriment to either party.
(h) The DC VEBA has not incurred
and will continue not to incur any fees,
costs, or other charges (other than those
described in the DC VEBA and the DC
VEBA Settlement Agreement) as a result
of the covered transactions described
herein.
(i) Ford and the Committee have
maintained and will continue to
maintain for a period of six (6) years
from the date of any of the covered
transactions, any and all records
necessary to enable the persons
described in section II(j), below, of this
exemption to determine whether
conditions of this exemption have been
and will continue to be met, except that
(1) a prohibited transaction will not be
considered to have occurred if, due to
circumstances beyond the control of
Ford or the Committee, the records are
lost or destroyed prior to the end of the
six-year period, and (2) no party in
interest other than Ford or the
Committee shall be subject to the civil
penalty that may be assessed under
section 502(i) of the Act if the records
are not maintained, or are not available
for examination as required by section
II(j), below, of this exemption.
(j)(1) Except as provided in section
II(j)(2), below, of this exemption and
notwithstanding any provisions of
subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 504
of the Act, the records referred to in
section II(i), above, of this exemption
have been or will be unconditionally
available at their customary location
during normal business hours to:
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department;
(B) The International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural
Implement Workers of America (the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Sep 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
UAW) or any duly authorized
representative of the UAW;
(C) Ford or any duly authorized
representative of Ford; and
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of
the DC VEBA, or any duly authorized
representative of such participant or
beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described in
section II(j)(1)(B) or (D), above, in this
exemption is authorized to examine the
trade secrets of Ford, or commercial or
financial information that is privileged
or confidential.
Section III. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption, the
term—
(a) ‘‘Ford’’ means Ford Motor
Company and its affiliates.
(b) ‘‘Affiliate’’ means:
(1) Any person directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with such other
person;
(2) Any officer, director, or partner,
employee or relative (as defined in
section 3(15) of the Act) of such other
person; or
(3) Any corporation, partnership or
other entity of which such other person
is an officer, director or partner. (For
purposes of this definition, the term
‘‘control’’ means the power to exercise
a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a person
other than an individual.)
(c) ‘‘Class’’ or ‘‘Class Members’’ mean
all persons who, as of the ratification
date (the Ratification Date), as defined
in section I(a) of the Settlement
Agreement, (i.e., December 22, 2005)
were: (1) Ford/UAW hourly employees
who had retired from Ford with
eligibility to participate in retirement in
the Hospital-Surgical-Medical-DrugDental-Vision Program (the Original
Plan), as in effect prior to the
Ratification Date, or (2) the spouses,
surviving spouses, and dependents of
Ford/UAW hourly employees, who, as
of the Ratification Date, were eligible for
post-retirement or surviving spouse
health care coverage under the Original
Plan as a consequence of a Ford/UAW
hourly employee’s retirement from Ford
or death prior to retirement. Active
employees, as defined in section I(A) of
the Settlement Agreement, are not
members of the Class.
(d) ‘‘Committee’’ means the seven (7)
individuals, consisting of two classes:
(1) the UAW with three members, and
(2) the public class with four members,
who act as the named fiduciary and
administrator of the DC VEBA.
(e) ‘‘Court’’ or ‘‘Michigan District
Court’’ means the United States District
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49039
Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan.
(f) ‘‘DC VEBA’’ means the defined
contribution—Voluntary Employees’
Beneficiary Association trust
established by Ford pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement and the trust
agreement (the Trust Agreement).
(g) ‘‘DC VEBA Settlement Agreement’’
or the ‘‘Settlement Agreement’’ means
the agreement, dated February 13, 2006,
which was entered into between Ford,
the UAW, and class representatives, on
behalf of a class of plaintiffs in a class
action suit cited as Int’l Union, UAW, et
al. v. Ford Motor Company (Civil Case
No. 05–74730 (E.D. Mich. July 13, 2006),
aff’d, 497 F.3d 615 (6th Cir. 2007)
(hereinafter referred to as the Hardwick
I Case).
(h) ‘‘Mitigation’’ means the reduction
of monthly contributions, deductibles,
out-of-pocket maximums, co-insurance
payments, or any other payment in
accordance with section 14 of the
Settlement Agreement to the extent
payments from the DC VEBA are made,
as directed by the Committee, to Ford
and/or to providers, insurance carriers
and other agreed-upon entities.
(i) ‘‘OPEB’’ means Other PostEmployment Benefits. The OPEB
Valuation is an actuarially developed
valuation of a company’s post
retirement benefit obligations, other
than for pension and other retirement
income plans. The OPEB Valuation is
based on a set of uniform financial
reporting standards promulgated by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board
and embodied in Financial Accounting
Standard 106, as revised from time to
time. The types of benefits addressed in
an OPEB Valuation typically are retiree
healthcare (medical, dental, vision,
hearing) life insurance, tuition
assistance, and legal services
(j) ‘‘Shares’’ or ‘‘Stock’’ refers to the
common stock of Ford for which the par
value is $.01.
(k) ‘‘UAW’’ means the International
Union, United Automobile, Aerospace
and Agricultural Implement Workers of
America or the United Auto Workers, if
shortened.
(l) ‘‘VEBA’’ means a voluntary
employees’ beneficiary association.
(m) ‘‘Defined Contribution Plan’’ or
‘‘the Defined Contribution Plan of the
Independent Health Care Trust for UAW
Retirees of Ford Motor Company’’
means the defined contribution welfare
benefit plan funded by the DC VEBA
following the effective date (the
Effective Date), as defined in section
I(A) of the Settlement Agreement (i.e.,
July 13, 2006), which will include the
requirement to make contributions to
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
49040
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 185 / Friday, September 25, 2009 / Notices
the DC VEBA, as set forth in section 13
of the Settlement Agreement.
Effective Date: This exemption is
effective, as of July 13, 2006.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Written Comments
In the Notice of Proposed Exemption
(the Notice), the Department invited all
interested persons to submit written
comments and requests for a hearing on
the proposed exemption within fortyfive (45) days of the date of the
publication of the Notice in the Federal
Register on June 26, 2009.
During the comment period, the
Department received no requests for a
hearing. However, the Department
received a comment from the applicant
informing the Department of a
correction to certain language contained
in the heading of the Notice. In this
regard, the references to ‘‘Ford Motor
Corporation,’’ as set forth in the heading
of the Notice on page 30635, should be
revised to read ‘‘Ford Motor Company.’’
The Department acknowledges the
correction, as requested by the
applicant, and in the final exemption
has amended the reference to Ford
Motor Company.
After giving full consideration to the
entire record, the Department has
decided to grant the exemption, as
amended above. The complete
application file is made available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, Room
N–1513, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption refer to the Notice published
on June 26, 2009, at 74 FR 30635.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angelena C. Le Blanc of the Department
at telephone number 202–693–8540
(This is not a toll-free number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which among other things
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Sep 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) This exemption is supplemental to
and not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transactional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption
is subject to the express condition that
the material facts and representations
contained in the application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
September 2009.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E9–23167 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (09–082)]
NASA Advisory Council; Science
Committee; Planetary Science
Subcommittee; Meeting
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA)
announces a meeting of the Planetary
Science Subcommittee of the NASA
Advisory Council (NAC). This
Subcommittee reports to the Science
Committee of the NAC. The Meeting
will be held for the purpose of soliciting
from the scientific community and other
persons scientific and technical
information relevant to program
planning.
Friday, October 16, 2009, 2 p.m.
to 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
ADDRESSES: This meeting will take place
telephonically. Any interested person
may contact Ms. Marian Norris to
receive a toll free number and pass code
needed to participate in this meeting by
telephone.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Marian Norris, Science Mission
DATE:
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Directorate, NASA Headquarters,
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–4452,
fax (202) 358–4118, or
mnorris@nasa.gov.
The
agenda for the meeting includes the
following topics:
—Planetary Science Division Update.
—Mars Science Laboratory Update.
It is imperative that the meeting be
held on this date to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–23176 Filed 9–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
COORDINATION OFFICE
Nanoscale Science, Engineering and
Technology Subcommittee, National
Science and Technology Council,
Committee on Technology;
Nanomaterials and the Environment &
Instrumentation, Metrology, and
Analytical Methods Workshop:
Nanotechnology Primer Public PreMeeting
ACTION:
Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: The National Nanotechnology
Coordination Office (NNCO), on behalf
of the Nanoscale Science, Engineering,
and Technology (NSET) Subcommittee
of the Committee on Technology,
National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC), will hold a
Nanotechnology Primer public premeeting on October 5, 2009, prior to the
public meeting on Nanomaterials and
the Environment & Instrumentation,
Metrology, and Analytical Methods
Workshop. The purpose of this premeeting is to provide general
background material about
nanotechnology and Federal
nanotechnology research to participants.
DATES: A Nanotechnology Primer public
pre-meeting will be held on Monday,
October 5, 2009 from 7 p.m.–8:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The Nanotechnology Primer
public pre-meeting will be held at the
Holiday Inn Rosslyn-Key Bridge, 1900
N. Fort Myer Drive, Arlington, VA
22209 (Metro stop: Rosslyn on the
Orange and Blue lines). For directions,
please see https://www.holidayinn.com.
Registration: Due to space limitations,
pre-registration for the workshop is
required. People interested in attending
the workshop and/or the
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 185 (Friday, September 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49034-49040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-23167]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Grant of Individual Exemptions and Prohibited Transaction
Exemptions Involving: M&T Bank Corporation Pension Plan, PTE 2009-26;
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, PTE 2009-27; and Ford Motor
Company and Its Affiliates (Collectively, Ford), PTE 2009-28
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of the prohibited transaction
restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA or the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal Register of the pendency
before the Department of a proposal to grant such exemption. The notice
set forth a summary of facts and representations contained in the
application for exemption and referred interested persons to the
application for a complete statement of the facts and representations.
The application has been available for public inspection at the
Department in Washington, DC. The notice also invited interested
persons to submit comments on the requested exemption to the
Department. In addition the notice stated that any interested person
might submit a written request that a public hearing be held (where
appropriate). The applicant has represented that it has complied with
the requirements of the notification to interested persons. No requests
for a hearing were received by the Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption was issued and the exemption is
being granted solely by the Department because, effective December 31,
1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1
(1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to
issue exemptions of the type proposed to the Secretary of Labor.
Statutory Findings
In accordance with section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code and the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes the following findings:
(a) The exemption is administratively feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests of the plan and its
participants and beneficiaries; and
(c) The exemption is protective of the rights of the participants
and beneficiaries of the plan.
M&T Bank Corporation Pension Plan, Located in Buffalo, NY.
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2009-26
Exemption Application No. D-11470]
[[Page 49035]]
Exemption
Section I. Transactions
Effective January 18, 2007, the restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(A) through (D) and 406(b)(1) and (2) of the Act and the
sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code, shall not
apply to the in-kind redemptions (the Redemptions) of shares (the
Shares) held by the M&T Bank Corporation Pension Plan (the Plan) of the
MTB Mid Cap Growth Fund and the MTB Large Cap Stock Fund (the Fund(s))
for which affiliates of Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (M&T)
provide investment advisory services and other services.
Section II. Conditions
This exemption is subject to the following conditions:
(a) The Plan paid no sales commissions, redemption fees, or other
similar fees in connection with the Redemptions (other than customary
transfer charges paid to parties other than M&T and affiliates of M&T
(M&T Affiliates).
(b) The assets transferable to the Plan consisted of only cash and
Transferable Securities, as defined in Section III;
(c) With certain exceptions explained in Representation 6 below,
the Plan received a pro rata portion of the Transferable Securities,
pursuant to the Redemptions that, when added to the cash received, was
equal in value to the number of Shares redeemed for such Transferable
Securities, as determined in a single valuation (using sources
independent of M&T and M&T affiliates) performed in the same manner and
as of the close of business on the same day as the day of the
Redemptions, in accordance with Rule 2a-4 under the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended from time to time (the 1940 Act), and the then-
existing procedures established by the Fund that are in compliance with
the 1940 Act, and the Plan received the Transferable Securities on the
next business day following the date of the Redemptions;
(d) Neither M&T nor any M&T Affiliate received any fees, including
any fees payable pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, in
connection with the Redemptions;
(e) M&T retained an Independent Fiduciary, as such term is defined
in Section III. The Independent Fiduciary determined that the terms of
the Redemptions were fair to the participants of the Plan and
comparable to and no less favorable than terms obtainable at arm's
length between unaffiliated parties, and that the Redemptions were in
the best interest of the Plan and its participants and beneficiaries;
(f) M&T or the relevant Fund provided to the Independent Fiduciary
a written confirmation regarding such Redemptions containing:
(1) The number of Shares held by the Plan immediately before the
Redemptions (and the related per Share net asset value and the total
dollar value of the Shares held),
(2) the identity (and related aggregate dollar value) of each
Transferable Security provided to the Plan at the time of the
Redemptions, including each Transferable Security valued in accordance
with Rule 2a-4 under the 1940 Act and the then-existing procedures
established by the Fund (using sources independent of M&T and M&T
Affiliates) for obtaining prices from independent pricing services or
market-makers,
(3) the market price of each Transferable Security received by the
Plan at the time of the Redemptions, and
(4) the identity of each pricing service or market-marker consulted
in determining the value of each Transferable Security at the time of
the Redemptions.
(g) The value of the Transferable Securities and cash received by
the Plan for each redeemed Share equaled the net asset value of such
Share at the time of the transaction, and such value equaled the value
that would have been received by any other investor for shares of the
same class of the Fund at the time;
(h) For a period of six months following the Redemptions, MTB
Investment Advisors (MTBIA), an M&T Affiliate and the investment
advisor to the MTB Group of Funds (MTB Funds) reimbursed the Plan for
commissions and fees incurred in connection with Transferable
Securities received as a result of the Redemptions and subsequently
sold;
(i) Following the Redemptions, M&T, on behalf of the Plan, has paid
and will continue to pay investment management fees for the Plan's
investment in the separate accounts so long as MTBIA serves as the
investment manager for the Plan;
(j) Subsequent to the Redemptions, the Independent Fiduciary
performs a post-transaction review that includes, among other things,
testing a sampling of material aspects of the Redemptions deemed in its
judgment to be representative, including pricing;
(k) M&T maintains, or causes to be maintained, for a period of six
years from the date the Redemptions, such records as are necessary to
enable the person described in paragraph (l)(1) below to determine
whether the conditions of this exemption have been met, except that
(1) if the records necessary to enable the persons described in
Section II(l)(1) to determine whether the conditions of this exemption
have been met are lost, or destroyed, due to circumstances beyond the
control of M&T, then no prohibited transaction will be considered to
have occurred solely on the basis of the unavailability of those
records; and
(2) no party in interest with respect to the Plan other than M&T
shall be subject to the civil penalty that may be assessed under
section 502(i) of the Act or to the taxes imposed by section 4975(a)
and (b) of the Code if such records are not maintained or are not
available for examination as required by Section II(k).
(l)(1) Except as provided in this Section II(l)(2) and
notwithstanding any provision of section 504(a)(2) and (b) of the act,
the records referred to in Section II(k) are unconditionally available
at their customary locations for examination during normal business
hours by:
(i) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the United
States Department of Labor (the Department), the Internal Revenue
Service, or the Securities and Exchange Commission,
(ii) any fiduciary of the Plan or any duly authorized
representative of such participant or beneficiary,
(iii) any participant or beneficiary of the Plan or duly authorized
representative of such participant or beneficiary,
(iv) any employer whose employees are covered by the Plan, and
(v) any employee organization whose members are covered by such
Plan;
(2) None of the persons described in Section II(l)(1)(ii) through
(v) shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of M&T, the Funds, or
the investment advisor for the Funds, or commercial or financial
information which is privileged or confidential; and
(3) Should M&T, the Funds, or the investment advisor for the Funds
refuse to disclose information on the basis that such information is
exempt from disclosure pursuant to Section II(l)(2) above, M&T, the
Funds, or the investment advisor shall, by the close of the 30th day
following the request, provide a written notice advising that person of
the reasons for the refusal and that the Department may request such
information.
[[Page 49036]]
Section III--Definitions
For purposes of this proposed exemption,
(a) The term ``M & T'' means Manufacturers and Traders Trust
Company which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the M&T Bank Corporation.
(b) The term ``affiliate'' means:
(1) Any person (including a corporation or partnership) directly or
indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with the person;
(2) Any officer, director, employee, or partner in any such person;
and
(3) Any corporation or partnership of which such person is an
officer, director, partner, or employee.
(c) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual.
(d) The term ``net asset value'' means the amount for purposes of
pricing all purchases and sales calculated by dividing the value of
securities, determined by a method as set forth in the Fund's
prospectus and statement of additional information, and other assets
belonging to the Fund, less the liabilities charged to each such
Portfolio, by the number of outstanding shares.
(e) The term ``Independent Fiduciary'' means a fiduciary who is:
(1) Independent of and unrelated to M&T and its affiliates, and
(2) Appointed to act on behalf of the Plan with respect to the
Redemptions.
For purposes of this exemption, a fiduciary will not be deemed to
be independent of and unrelated to M&T if:
(3) Such fiduciary directly or indirectly controls, is controlled
by or is under common control with M&T;
(4) Such fiduciary, directly or indirectly receives any
compensation or other consideration in connection with any transaction
described in this exemption (except that an independent fiduciary may
receive compensation from M&T in connection with the transactions
discussed herein if the amount or payment of such compensation is not
contingent upon or in any way affected by the independent fiduciary's
ultimate decision); or
(5) Such fiduciary receives, in its current fiscal year, from M&T
or its affiliates, an amount that would have exceeded one percent (1%)
of such fiduciary's gross income in the prior fiscal year.
(f) The term ``Transferable Securities'' shall mean securities
(1) For which market quotations are readily available from persons
independent of M&T as determined pursuant to procedures established by
the Funds under Rule 2a-4 of the 1940 Act; and
(2) Which are not:
(i) Securities which, if publicly offered or sold, would require
registration under the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) Securities issued by entities in countries which (A) restrict
or prohibit the holding of securities by non-nationals other than
through qualified investment vehicles, such as the Funds, or (B) permit
transfers of ownership of securities to be effected only by
transactions conducted on a local stock exchange;
(iii) Certain portfolio positions (such as forward foreign currency
contracts, futures and options contracts, swap transactions,
certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements) that, although they
may be liquid and marketable, involve the assumption of contractual
obligations, require trading facilities or can only be traded with the
counter-party to the transaction to effect a change in beneficial
ownership;
(iv) Cash equivalents (such as certificates of deposit, commercial
paper and repurchase agreements);
(v) Other assets which are not readily distributable (including
receivables and prepaid expenses), net of all liabilities (including
accounts payable); and
(vi) Securities subject to ``stop transfer'' instructions or
similar contractual restrictions on transfer. Effective Date: This
exemption is effective as of the date of this grant.
Written Comments
In the Notice of Proposed Exemption (the Notice), the Department
invited all interested persons to submit written comments and requests
for a hearing.
During the comment period, the Department received no requests for
a hearing. The Department did receive a comment from the Applicant
dated May 1, 2009. The Applicant cited several issues with regard to
the Notice as follows.
1) Section II(c) of the Notice reads as follows:
With certain exceptions explained in Representation 6 below, the
Plan received a pro rata portion of the Transferable Securities,
pursuant to the Redemptions that, when added to the cash received,
was equal in value to the number of Shares redeemed for such
Transferable Securities, as determined in a single valuation (using
sources independent of M&T and M&T affiliates) performed in the same
manner and as of the close of business on the same day as the day of
receipt of the Transferable Securities, in accordance with Rule 2a-4
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended from time to
time (the 1940 Act), and the then-existing procedures established by
the Fund that are in compliance the 1940 Act;
The Applicant explains that the valuation described in section II(c) of
the Notice and the actual receipt of the Transferable Securities by the
Plan could have occurred on different days. The Applicant represents
that although the valuation occurred on the same day as the date of the
Redemptions, the actual receipt of the Transferable Securities by the
Plan occurred on the next business day following the date of the
Redemptions. Based on the Applicant's clarification, the Department has
determined to amend the language of section II(c) as follows:
With certain exceptions explained in Representation 6 below, the
Plan received a pro rata portion of the Transferable Securities,
pursuant to the Redemptions that, when added to the cash received,
was equal in value to the number of Shares redeemed for such
Transferable Securities, as determined in a single valuation (using
sources independent of M&T and M&T affiliates) performed in the same
manner and as of the close of business on the same day as the day of
the Redemptions, in accordance with Rule 2a-4 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended from time to time (the 1940 Act),
and the then-existing procedures established by the Fund that are in
compliance the 1940 Act, and the Plan received the Transferable
Securities on the next business day following the date of the
Redemptions;
2) The Applicant requested that section II(i) and subparagraph (e)
of Paragraph 15 of the Summary of Facts and Representations of the
Notice should be deleted. The condition set forth in Section II(i) of
the Notice and subparagraph (e) of Paragraph 15 reads as follows:
Following the Redemptions, M&T, on behalf of the Plan, has paid
and will continue to pay total annual expenses, including investment
management fees for the Plan's investment in the separate accounts;
In addition, the subparagraph (d) of Paragraph 14 of the Summary of
Facts and Representations of the Notice reads as follows:
The Plan will no longer pay investment management fees with
respect to its investment in the separate accounts charged by MTBIA.
The Applicant clarified its application to indicate that it intended to
pay only investment management fees on behalf of the Plan's investment
in the M&T separate accounts. In this regard, Evercore Trust Company,
N.A.
[[Page 49037]]
(Evercore), the independent fiduciary and the successor of U.S. Trust
Company, stated in a June 9, 2009 letter to the Department that the
Funds' total annual expenses include certain expenses that have no
clear counterpart when assets are separately managed (e.g., transfer
agency fees, custody fees, shareholder servicing fees). The only fees
specifically associated with a separately managed arrangement are the
manager's investment management fees. Given that M&T has agreed to pay
for the investment management fees associated with the separate
accounts, it is therefore consistent to describer the Plan's on-going
savings as the Fund's total annual expenses.
The Applicant also clarified its application to indicate that it
did not intend to absorb permanently the investment management costs
associated with the separate accounts on behalf of the Plan. The
Applicant represents that if the Plan should cease using MTBIA and hire
an investment manager unaffiliated with the Applicant, the Applicant
may at that time cease paying the investment management fees.
The Department has revised section II(i) of the Notice to read as
follows:
Following the Redemptions, M&T, on behalf of the Plan, has paid
and will continue to pay investment management fees for the Plan's
investment in the separate accounts so long as MTBIA serves as the
investment manager for the Plan;
In addition, subparagraph (d) of Paragraph 14 and subparagraph (e) of
Paragraph 15 of the Summary of Facts and Representations in the Notice
should read as follows:
Following the Redemptions, M&T, on behalf of the Plan, has paid
and will continue to pay investment management fees for the Plan's
investment in the separate accounts so long as MTBIA serves as the
investment manager for the Plan;
3) The Applicant requests that the language contained in paragraph
2 of the Summary of Facts and Representations in the Notice be revised,
in order to reflect the fact that M&T manages Plan investments and does
not manage the Plan itself. Paragraph 2 of the Summary of Facts and
Representations in the Notice reads as follows:
``M&T serves as trustee of the Plan and manages the Plan.''
The Department concurs with the Applicant's suggested revision. In this
regard, the last sentence of paragraph 2 of the Summary of Facts and
Representations, as set forth in the Notice, should read as follows:
``M&T serves as trustee of the Plan and manages the Plan's
investments.''
(4) The Applicant requested that the second sentence of paragraph 5
of the Summary of Facts and Representations in the Notice be clarified.
The second sentence of Paragraph 5 of the Summary of Facts and
Representations in the Notice reads as follows:
M&T determined that the Plan's investments in the Funds were
large enough so that an all-cash redemption would adversely impact
the Funds and to proceed with the Redemptions.
The Applicant represents that specifically, it was the board of the MTB
Funds that determined that an all-cash redemption would adversely
impact the MTB Funds.
The Department concurs with the Applicant's suggested revisions. In
this regard, the second sentence of paragraph 5 of the Summary of Facts
and Representations, as set forth in the Notice is revised to read as
follows:
The board of the MTB Funds determined that the Plan's
investments in the Funds were large enough so that an all-cash
redemption would adversely impact the Funds and to proceed with the
Redemptions.
(5) The Applicant requested a clarification of the word ``it''
which should have read the ``MTB Funds'' in the third sentence of
footnote 9 of the Summary of Facts and Representations. The third
sentence of footnote 9 of the Summary of Facts and Representations in
the Notice reads as follows:
M&T represents it has adopted procedures in accordance with the
Signature Financial Letter for use in affiliated transactions, and
those procedures must be followed for transactions with the Plan, as
the Plan is treated as an affiliate under the 1940 Act of the funds
whose shares are being redeemed.
The Department concurs with the Applicant's suggested revisions. In
this regard, the third sentence of footnote 9 of the Summary of Facts
and Representations in the Notice is amended to read as follows:
M&T represents that the MTB Funds have adopted procedures in
accordance with the Signature Financial Letter for use in affiliated
transactions, and those procedures must be followed for transactions
with the Plan, as the Plan is treated as an affiliate under the 1940
Act of the funds whose shares are being redeemed.
After reviewing the entire record, including the comments submitted,
the Department has decided to grant this exemption as revised herein.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to
the Notice published on February 25, 2009, 74 FR 8576.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anh-Viet Ly of the Department,
telephone (202) 693-8648. (This is not a toll-free number).
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, Located in Pittsburgh, PA.
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2009-27
[Application No. D-11553]
Exemption
The restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A) through (D), 406(b)(1)
and 406(b)(2) of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code,\1\ shall not apply, effective
November 25, 2008, to the cash sale of certain securities (the
Securities) issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. or its affiliates
(Lehman) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5,512,395 by
the EB SMAM Securities Lending Temporary Investment Fund (the Cash
Collateral Fund) to the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNYMC), a
party in interest with respect to the employee benefit plans (the
Plan(s)) invested, directly or indirectly, in the Cash Collateral Fund;
provided that the following conditions are met:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this exemption, references to specific
provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer
also to the corresponding provisions of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) The sale of the Securities was a one-time transaction for cash;
(b) The Cash Collateral Fund received an amount for the sale of the
Securities which was equal to the sum of:
(1) The amortized cost of the Securities, and
(2) The accrued but unpaid interest on each of the Securities,
determined as of the earlier of: (A) The date of the sale of the
Securities, or (B) the maturity date of each of the Securities;
(c) The amount received by the Cash Collateral Fund for the sale of
the Securities was greater than the aggregate market value of the
Securities at the time of the sale, as determined based on information
regarding the then prevailing trading prices for the Securities
obtained from two independent broker-dealers;
(d) The Cash Collateral Fund did not bear any commissions, fees,
transactions costs, or other expenses in connection with the sale of
the Securities;
(e) The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon), as trustee of the
Cash Collateral Fund, determined that the sale of the Securities was
appropriate for and in the best interest of the Cash Collateral Fund,
and the Plans invested,
[[Page 49038]]
directly or indirectly, in the Cash Collateral Fund, at the time of the
transaction;
(f) BNY Mellon took all appropriate actions necessary to safeguard
the interests of the Cash Collateral Fund, and the Plans invested,
directly or indirectly, in the Cash Collateral Fund, in connection with
the transaction, given that Lehman had filed for bankruptcy and that
the value of the Securities had declined substantially;
(g) If the exercise of any of BNYMC's rights, claims, or causes of
action in connection with its ownership of the Securities results in
BNYMC recovering from Lehman, the issuer of the Securities, or from any
third party, an aggregate amount that is more than the sum of:
(1) The purchase price paid for such Securities by BNYMC; and
(2) The interest due on the Securities from and after the date
BNYMC purchased the Securities from the Cash Collateral Fund,
determined at the last-published interest rate on the Securities
preceding Lehman's bankruptcy filing, BNYMC will refund such excess
amount promptly to the Cash Collateral Fund (after deducting all
reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the recovery);
(h) BNY Mellon and its affiliates, as applicable, maintain, or
cause to be maintained, for a period of six (6) years from the date of
the transaction such records as are necessary to enable the persons
described, below, in paragraph (i)(1), to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption have been met, except that--
(1) No party in interest with respect to a Plan which engages in
the transaction, other than BNY Mellon and its affiliates, as
applicable, shall be subject to a civil penalty under section 502(i) of
the Act or the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if
such records are not maintained, or not available for examination, as
required, below, by paragraph (i)(1); and
(2) A separate prohibited transaction shall not be considered to
have occurred solely because, due to circumstances beyond the control
of BNY Mellon and its affiliates, as applicable, such records are lost
or destroyed prior to the end of the six-year period.
(i)(1) Except as provided, below, in paragraph (i)(2), and
notwithstanding any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section
504 of the Act, the records referred to, above, in paragraph (h) are
unconditionally available at their customary location for examination
during normal business hours by--
(A) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department, the Internal Revenue Service, or the Securities and
Exchange Commission; or
(B) Any fiduciary of a Plan that engages in the transaction, or any
duly authorized employee or representative of such fiduciary; or
(C) Any employer of participants and beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are covered by a Plan that engages in the
transaction, or any authorized employee or representative of these
entities; or
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of a Plan that engages in the
transaction, or duly authorized employee or representative of such
participant or beneficiary;
(2) None of the persons described, above, in paragraph (i)(1)(B)-
(D) shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of BNY Mellon and its
affiliates, as applicable, or commercial or financial information which
is privileged or confidential; and
(3) Should BNY Mellon and its affiliates, as applicable, refuse to
disclose information on the basis that such information is exempt from
disclosure, BNY Mellon and its affiliates, as applicable, shall, by the
close of the thirtieth (30th) day following the request, provide a
written notice advising that person of the reasons for the refusal and
that the Department may request such information.
Effective Date: This exemption is effective, as of November 25,
2008.
After giving full consideration to the entire record, the
Department has decided to grant the exemption, as described above. The
complete application file is made available for public inspection in
the Public Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Room N-1513, U. S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to
the Notice published on July 23, 2009, at 74 FR 36515.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Angelena C. Le Blanc of the
Department, telephone (202) 693-8540. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Ford Motor Company and Its Affiliates, (collectively, Ford)
Located in Detroit, MI.
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2009-28 Application No. L-11451]
Exemption
Section I. Covered Transactions
The restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1),
and 406(b)(2) of the Act shall not apply, effective July 13, 2006, to:
(1) monthly cash advances to Ford by the Independent Health Care Trust
for UAW Retirees of Ford Motor Company (the DC VEBA), as defined in
section III(f), below, of this exemption, to reimburse Ford for the
estimated mitigation of certain health care expenses (the Mitigation),
as defined in section III(h), below, of this exemption, and during the
period from July 14, 2006 through February 28, 2007, for the payment of
dental expenses incurred by participants in the DC VEBA; and (2) an
annual ``true-up'' of the Mitigation payments and dental expenses
against the actual expenses incurred, with the result that: (a) if Ford
has been underpaid by the DC VEBA, Ford receives the balance
outstanding from the DC VEBA with interest, or (b) if the DC VEBA has
overpaid Ford, Ford reimburses the DC VEBA for the amount overpaid,
with interest.
Section II. Conditions
This exemption is conditioned upon adherence to the material facts
and representations described in application for exemption, and upon
satisfaction of the following conditions:
(a) A committee (the Committee), as defined in section III(d),
below, of this exemption, acting as a fiduciary independent of Ford,
has represented and will continue to represent the DC VEBA and its
participants and beneficiaries for all purposes with respect to the
Mitigation process under the settlement agreement (the DC VEBA
Settlement Agreement or the Settlement Agreement), as defined in
section III(g), below, of this exemption.
(b) The Committee for the DC VEBA has discharged and will continue
to discharge its duties consistent with the terms of the DC VEBA and
the Settlement Agreement.
(c) The Committee and actuaries retained by the Committee have
reviewed and approved and will continue to review and approve the
estimation process involved in the Mitigation, which results in the
monthly Mitigation amount paid to Ford.
(d) Outside auditors retained by the Committee, along with an
administrative company that is partly owned by the DC VEBA, have
audited and will audit the calculation of the true-up to determine
whether there are any differences between the estimated Mitigation and
actual Mitigation amounts and have made and will make such information
available to Ford.
(e) Ford has provided various reports and records to the Committee
concerning dental care reimbursements
[[Page 49039]]
for the period from July 14, 2006, through February 28, 2007, which
were subject to review and audit by the Committee, and Ford has
provided and will continue to provide various reports and records to
the Committee concerning the Mitigation required under the Settlement
Agreement which were and will continue to be subject to review and
audit by the Committee.
(f) The terms of the covered transactions are no less favorable and
will continue to be no less favorable to the DC VEBA than the terms
negotiated at arm's length under similar circumstances between
unrelated third parties.
(g) The interest rate applied to any true-up payments is a
reasonable rate, as set forth in the DC VEBA Settlement Agreement, and
will continue to be a reasonable rate that runs from the beginning of
the year being trued up and does not and will not present a windfall or
detriment to either party.
(h) The DC VEBA has not incurred and will continue not to incur any
fees, costs, or other charges (other than those described in the DC
VEBA and the DC VEBA Settlement Agreement) as a result of the covered
transactions described herein.
(i) Ford and the Committee have maintained and will continue to
maintain for a period of six (6) years from the date of any of the
covered transactions, any and all records necessary to enable the
persons described in section II(j), below, of this exemption to
determine whether conditions of this exemption have been and will
continue to be met, except that (1) a prohibited transaction will not
be considered to have occurred if, due to circumstances beyond the
control of Ford or the Committee, the records are lost or destroyed
prior to the end of the six-year period, and (2) no party in interest
other than Ford or the Committee shall be subject to the civil penalty
that may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act if the records are
not maintained, or are not available for examination as required by
section II(j), below, of this exemption.
(j)(1) Except as provided in section II(j)(2), below, of this
exemption and notwithstanding any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and
(b) of section 504 of the Act, the records referred to in section
II(i), above, of this exemption have been or will be unconditionally
available at their customary location during normal business hours to:
(A) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department;
(B) The International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and
Agricultural Implement Workers of America (the UAW) or any duly
authorized representative of the UAW;
(C) Ford or any duly authorized representative of Ford; and
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of the DC VEBA, or any duly
authorized representative of such participant or beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described in section II(j)(1)(B) or (D),
above, in this exemption is authorized to examine the trade secrets of
Ford, or commercial or financial information that is privileged or
confidential.
Section III. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption, the term--
(a) ``Ford'' means Ford Motor Company and its affiliates.
(b) ``Affiliate'' means:
(1) Any person directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common control
with such other person;
(2) Any officer, director, or partner, employee or relative (as
defined in section 3(15) of the Act) of such other person; or
(3) Any corporation, partnership or other entity of which such
other person is an officer, director or partner. (For purposes of this
definition, the term ``control'' means the power to exercise a
controlling influence over the management or policies of a person other
than an individual.)
(c) ``Class'' or ``Class Members'' mean all persons who, as of the
ratification date (the Ratification Date), as defined in section I(a)
of the Settlement Agreement, (i.e., December 22, 2005) were: (1) Ford/
UAW hourly employees who had retired from Ford with eligibility to
participate in retirement in the Hospital-Surgical-Medical-Drug-Dental-
Vision Program (the Original Plan), as in effect prior to the
Ratification Date, or (2) the spouses, surviving spouses, and
dependents of Ford/UAW hourly employees, who, as of the Ratification
Date, were eligible for post-retirement or surviving spouse health care
coverage under the Original Plan as a consequence of a Ford/UAW hourly
employee's retirement from Ford or death prior to retirement. Active
employees, as defined in section I(A) of the Settlement Agreement, are
not members of the Class.
(d) ``Committee'' means the seven (7) individuals, consisting of
two classes: (1) the UAW with three members, and (2) the public class
with four members, who act as the named fiduciary and administrator of
the DC VEBA.
(e) ``Court'' or ``Michigan District Court'' means the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
(f) ``DC VEBA'' means the defined contribution--Voluntary
Employees' Beneficiary Association trust established by Ford pursuant
to the Settlement Agreement and the trust agreement (the Trust
Agreement).
(g) ``DC VEBA Settlement Agreement'' or the ``Settlement
Agreement'' means the agreement, dated February 13, 2006, which was
entered into between Ford, the UAW, and class representatives, on
behalf of a class of plaintiffs in a class action suit cited as Int'l
Union, UAW, et al. v. Ford Motor Company (Civil Case No. 05-74730 (E.D.
Mich. July 13, 2006), aff'd, 497 F.3d 615 (6th Cir. 2007) (hereinafter
referred to as the Hardwick I Case).
(h) ``Mitigation'' means the reduction of monthly contributions,
deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, co-insurance payments, or any
other payment in accordance with section 14 of the Settlement Agreement
to the extent payments from the DC VEBA are made, as directed by the
Committee, to Ford and/or to providers, insurance carriers and other
agreed-upon entities.
(i) ``OPEB'' means Other Post-Employment Benefits. The OPEB
Valuation is an actuarially developed valuation of a company's post
retirement benefit obligations, other than for pension and other
retirement income plans. The OPEB Valuation is based on a set of
uniform financial reporting standards promulgated by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board and embodied in Financial Accounting
Standard 106, as revised from time to time. The types of benefits
addressed in an OPEB Valuation typically are retiree healthcare
(medical, dental, vision, hearing) life insurance, tuition assistance,
and legal services
(j) ``Shares'' or ``Stock'' refers to the common stock of Ford for
which the par value is $.01.
(k) ``UAW'' means the International Union, United Automobile,
Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America or the United
Auto Workers, if shortened.
(l) ``VEBA'' means a voluntary employees' beneficiary association.
(m) ``Defined Contribution Plan'' or ``the Defined Contribution
Plan of the Independent Health Care Trust for UAW Retirees of Ford
Motor Company'' means the defined contribution welfare benefit plan
funded by the DC VEBA following the effective date (the Effective
Date), as defined in section I(A) of the Settlement Agreement (i.e.,
July 13, 2006), which will include the requirement to make
contributions to
[[Page 49040]]
the DC VEBA, as set forth in section 13 of the Settlement Agreement.
Effective Date: This exemption is effective, as of July 13, 2006.
Written Comments
In the Notice of Proposed Exemption (the Notice), the Department
invited all interested persons to submit written comments and requests
for a hearing on the proposed exemption within forty-five (45) days of
the date of the publication of the Notice in the Federal Register on
June 26, 2009.
During the comment period, the Department received no requests for
a hearing. However, the Department received a comment from the
applicant informing the Department of a correction to certain language
contained in the heading of the Notice. In this regard, the references
to ``Ford Motor Corporation,'' as set forth in the heading of the
Notice on page 30635, should be revised to read ``Ford Motor Company.''
The Department acknowledges the correction, as requested by the
applicant, and in the final exemption has amended the reference to Ford
Motor Company.
After giving full consideration to the entire record, the
Department has decided to grant the exemption, as amended above. The
complete application file is made available for public inspection in
the Public Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Room N-1513, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to
the Notice published on June 26, 2009, at 74 FR 30635.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelena C. Le Blanc of the Department
at telephone number 202-693-8540 (This is not a toll-free number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption
under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified
person from certain other provisions to which the exemption does not
apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of section
404 of the Act, which among other things require a fiduciary to
discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of the
participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in
accordance with section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does it affect the
requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate
for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) This exemption is supplemental to and not in derogation of, any
other provisions of the Act and/or the Code, including statutory or
administrative exemptions and transactional rules. Furthermore, the
fact that a transaction is subject to an administrative or statutory
exemption is not dispositive of whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption is subject to the express
condition that the material facts and representations contained in the
application accurately describes all material terms of the transaction
which is the subject of the exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of September 2009.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E9-23167 Filed 9-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P