Proposed Information Collection Request of the ETA 227, Overpayment Detection and Recovery Activities; Comment Request, 44385-44386 [E9-20779]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 166 / Friday, August 28, 2009 / Notices
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on July
28, 2009, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, on behalf of Hexagon Metrology
AB of Sweden and Hexagon Metrology,
Inc. of North Kingstown, Rhode Island.
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain articulated coordinate measuring
arms and components thereof by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 5,829,148. The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mareesa A. Frederick Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2055.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
August 24, 2009, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:38 Aug 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain articulated
coordinate measuring arms or
components thereof that infringe one or
more of claims 3, 4, 13, and 16 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,829,148, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are—
Hexagon Metrology AB, Lilla Bantorget
15, SE–103 59, Stockholm, Sweden,
Hexagon Metrology, Inc., 250 Circuit
Drive, North Kingstown, Rhode Island
02852.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Metris N.V., Interleuvenlann 86, 3001
Leuven, Belgium, Metris U.S.A., Inc.,
12701 Grand River Avenue, Brighton,
Michigan 48116, Mitutoyo
Corporation, 20–1, Sakado 1–Chome,
Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa
213–8533, Japan, Mitutoyo America
Corporation, 965 Corporate
Boulevard, Aurora, Illinois 60502.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Mareesa A. Frederick, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC
20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44385
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
a respondent.
Issued: August 25, 2009.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–20812 Filed 8–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Proposed Information Collection
Request of the ETA 227, Overpayment
Detection and Recovery Activities;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Employment and Training
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collection of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the office listed below in
the addressee section of this notice or by
accessing: https://www.doleta.gov/
OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
October 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Nancy
Dean, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training
E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM
28AUN1
44386
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 166 / Friday, August 28, 2009 / Notices
Administration, Office of Workforce
Security, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room S–
4531, Washington, DC 20210, telephone
number (202)-693–3215 (this is not a
toll-free number) or by e-mail:
dean.nancy@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: Section 303(a)(1) of the
Social Security Act requires a state’s
unemployment insurance (UI) law to
include provisions for:
‘‘Such methods of administration * * * as
are found by the Secretary of Labor to be
reasonably calculated to insure full payment
of unemployment compensation when due
* * *’’
Section 303(a)(5) of the Social
Security Act further requires a state’s UI
law to include provisions for:
‘‘Expenditure of all money withdrawn from
an unemployment fund of such State, in the
payment of unemployment compensation
* * *’’
Section 3304(a)(4) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954 provides that:
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
‘‘all money withdrawn from the
unemployment fund of the State shall be
used solely in the payment of unemployment
compensation * * *’’
The Secretary of Labor has interpreted
the above sections of Federal law in
section 7511, part V, ES Manual to
further require a State’s UI law to
include provisions for such methods of
administration as are, within reason,
calculated to: (1) Detect benefits paid
through error by the State Workforce
Agency (SWA) or through willful
misrepresentation or error by the
claimant or others; (2) deter claimants
from obtaining benefits through willful
misrepresentation; and (3) recover
benefits overpaid. The ETA 227 is used
to determine whether SWAs meet these
requirements.
The ETA–227 contains data on the
number and amounts of fraud and nonfraud overpayments established, the
methods by which overpayments were
detected, the amounts and methods by
which overpayments were collected, the
amounts of overpayments waived and
written off, the accounts receivable for
overpayments outstanding, and data on
criminal/civil actions.
These data are gathered by 53 SWAs
and reported to the Department of Labor
following the end of each calendar
quarter. The overall effectiveness of
SWAs’ UI integrity efforts can be
determined by examining and analyzing
the data. These data are also used by
SWAs as a management tool for
effective UI program administration.
II. Review Focus: The Department of
Labor is particularly interested in
comments which:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:38 Aug 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
III. Current Actions: The UI program
paid approximately $42 billion in
benefits in 2008. Although the
overpayment rate (fraud and non-fraud)
derived from the ETA 227 is relatively
low (less than 3.25 percent), high
amounts of money are involved, and it
is in the national interest to maintain
the program’s integrity. Therefore, we
are proposing to extend the
authorization to collect data to measure
the effectiveness of the benefit payment
control programs in the SWAs.
Type of Review: Extension.
Agency: Employment and Training
Administration.
Title: Overpayment Detection and
Recovery Activities.
OMB Number: 1205–0173.
Agency Form Number: ETA 227.
Affected Public: State Government.
Total Respondents: 53 State agencies.
Frequency: Quarterly.
Total Responses: 212.
Average Time per Response: 14 hours.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 2,968.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information
collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
Dated: This 20th day of August 2009.
Jane Oates.
[FR Doc. E9–20779 Filed 8–27–09; 8:45 am]
P
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
147th Meeting of the Advisory Council
on Employee Welfare and Pension
Benefit Plans; Notice of Meeting
Pursuant to the authority contained in
Section 512 of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29
U.S.C. 1142, the 147th open meeting of
the Advisory Council on Employee
Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans will
be held on September 15–17, 2009.
The three-day meeting will take place
in Room N 3437 A&B, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. The meeting
will run from 9 a.m. to approximately 5
p.m. on September 15 and 16, and from
8 a.m. to approximately 4 p.m. on
September 17, with a one hour break for
lunch each day. The purpose of the
open meeting is for Council members to
hear testimony from invited witnesses
and to receive an update from the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA).
The Council will study the following
issues: (1) Promoting Retirement
Literacy and Security by Streamlining
Disclosures to Participants and
Beneficiaries, (2) Stable Value Funds
and Retirement Security in the Current
Economic Conditions, and (3)
Approaches for Retirement Security in
the United States. The schedule for
testimony and discussion of these issues
generally will be one issue per day in
the order noted above. Descriptions of
these topics are available on the
Advisory Council page of the EBSA Web
site at https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/
aboutebsa/erisa_advisory_council.html.
The EBSA update is scheduled for
September 16 at 9 a.m., subject to
change.
Organizations or members of the
public wishing to submit a written
statement may do so by submitting 30
copies on or before September 8, 2009
to Larry Good, Executive Secretary,
ERISA Advisory Council, U.S.
Department of Labor, Suite N–5623, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Statements also may be
submitted as e-mail attachments in text
or pdf format transmitted to
good.larry@dol.gov. It is requested that
statements not be included in the body
of the e-mail. Relevant statements
received on or before September 8, 2009
will be included in the record of the
meeting. Individuals or representatives
of organizations wishing to address the
Advisory Council should forward their
requests to the Executive Secretary or
E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM
28AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44385-44386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20779]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Proposed Information Collection Request of the ETA 227,
Overpayment Detection and Recovery Activities; Comment Request
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collection
of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to ensure that
requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be
obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section
of this notice or by accessing: https://www.doleta.gov/OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before October 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Nancy Dean, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training
[[Page 44386]]
Administration, Office of Workforce Security, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room S-4531, Washington, DC 20210,
telephone number (202)-693-3215 (this is not a toll-free number) or by
e-mail: dean.nancy@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: Section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act
requires a state's unemployment insurance (UI) law to include
provisions for:
``Such methods of administration * * * as are found by the
Secretary of Labor to be reasonably calculated to insure full
payment of unemployment compensation when due * * *''
Section 303(a)(5) of the Social Security Act further requires a
state's UI law to include provisions for:
``Expenditure of all money withdrawn from an unemployment fund
of such State, in the payment of unemployment compensation * * *''
Section 3304(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 provides
that:
``all money withdrawn from the unemployment fund of the State
shall be used solely in the payment of unemployment compensation * *
*''
The Secretary of Labor has interpreted the above sections of
Federal law in section 7511, part V, ES Manual to further require a
State's UI law to include provisions for such methods of administration
as are, within reason, calculated to: (1) Detect benefits paid through
error by the State Workforce Agency (SWA) or through willful
misrepresentation or error by the claimant or others; (2) deter
claimants from obtaining benefits through willful misrepresentation;
and (3) recover benefits overpaid. The ETA 227 is used to determine
whether SWAs meet these requirements.
The ETA-227 contains data on the number and amounts of fraud and
non-fraud overpayments established, the methods by which overpayments
were detected, the amounts and methods by which overpayments were
collected, the amounts of overpayments waived and written off, the
accounts receivable for overpayments outstanding, and data on criminal/
civil actions.
These data are gathered by 53 SWAs and reported to the Department
of Labor following the end of each calendar quarter. The overall
effectiveness of SWAs' UI integrity efforts can be determined by
examining and analyzing the data. These data are also used by SWAs as a
management tool for effective UI program administration.
II. Review Focus: The Department of Labor is particularly
interested in comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions: The UI program paid approximately $42 billion
in benefits in 2008. Although the overpayment rate (fraud and non-
fraud) derived from the ETA 227 is relatively low (less than 3.25
percent), high amounts of money are involved, and it is in the national
interest to maintain the program's integrity. Therefore, we are
proposing to extend the authorization to collect data to measure the
effectiveness of the benefit payment control programs in the SWAs.
Type of Review: Extension.
Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
Title: Overpayment Detection and Recovery Activities.
OMB Number: 1205-0173.
Agency Form Number: ETA 227.
Affected Public: State Government.
Total Respondents: 53 State agencies.
Frequency: Quarterly.
Total Responses: 212.
Average Time per Response: 14 hours.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 2,968.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintaining): $0.
Comments submitted in response to this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
Dated: This 20th day of August 2009.
Jane Oates.
[FR Doc. E9-20779 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
P