Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 42649-42650 [E4-20321]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 162 / Monday, August 24, 2009 / Notices
origin textile or apparel article that are
like or directly competitive with the
articles produced by the domestic
industry concerned are increasing in
absolute terms or relative to the
domestic market for that article; (3) U.S.
domestic production of the like or
directly competitive articles of U.S.
origin indicating the nature and extent
of the serious damage or actual threat
thereof, along with an affirmation that to
the best of the requester’s knowledge,
the data represent substantially all of
the domestic production of the like or
directly competitive article(s) of U.S.
origin; (4) imports from Oman as a
percentage of the domestic market of the
like or directly competitive article; and
(5) all data available to the requester
showing changes in productivity,
utilization of capacity, inventories,
exports, wages, employment, domestic
prices, profits, and investment, and any
other information, relating to the
existence of serious damage or actual
threat thereof caused by imports from
Oman to the industry producing the like
or directly competitive article that is the
subject of the request. To the extent that
such information is not available, the
requester should provide best estimates
and the basis therefor.
If CITA determines that the request
provides the information necessary for it
to be considered, CITA will publish a
notice in the Federal Register seeking
public comments regarding the request.
The comment period shall be 30
calendar days. The notice will include
a summary of the request. Any
interested party may submit information
to rebut, clarify, or correct public
comments submitted by any interested
party.
CITA will make a determination on
any request it considers within 60
calendar days of the close of the
comment period. If CITA is unable to
make a determination within 60
calendar days, it will publish a notice in
the Federal Register, including the date
it will make a determination.
If a determination under section
322(b) of the Act is affirmative, CITA
may provide tariff relief to a U.S.
industry to the extent necessary to
remedy or prevent serious damage or
actual threat thereof and to facilitate
adjustment by the domestic industry to
import competition. The import tariff
relief is effective beginning on the date
that CITA’s affirmative determination is
published in the Federal Register.
Entities submitting requests,
responses or rebuttals to CITA may
submit both a public and confidential
version of their submissions. If the
request is accepted, the public version
will be posted on the dedicated Oman
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:04 Aug 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
Free Trade Agreement textile safeguards
section of the Office of Textile and
Apparel (OTEXA) Web site. The
confidential version of the request,
responses or rebuttals will not be shared
with the public as it may contain
business confidential information.
Entities submitting responses or
rebuttals may use the public version of
the request as a basis for responses.
II. Method of Collection
When an interested party files a
request for a textile and apparel
safeguard action with CITA, ten copies
of any such request must be provided in
a paper format. If business confidential
information is provided, two copies of
a non-confidential version must also be
provided. If CITA determines that the
request provides the necessary
information to be considered, it
publishes a Federal Register notice
seeking public comments on the
request.
To the extent business confidential
information is provided, a nonconfidential version must also be
provided. Any interested party may
submit information to rebut, clarify, or
correct public comments submitted by
any interested party.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; business or other for-profit
organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 6
(1 for Request; 5 for Comments).
Estimated Time per Response: 4 hours
for a Request; and 4 hours for each
Comment.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 24.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $960.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42649
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: August 19, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–20283 Filed 8–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–580–809)
Circular Welded Non–Alloy Steel Pipe
From the Republic of Korea: Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 24, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Subler or Joe Shuler, at (202) 4820189 or (202) 482–1293, respectively;
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), on December 1, 2008,
Wheatland Tube Company
(‘‘Wheatland’’) and United States Steel
Corporation (‘‘U.S. Steel’’),
manufacturers of the domestic like
product, timely requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular
welded non–alloy steel pipe from the
Republic of Korea for the period
November 1, 2007, through October 31,
2008. Wheatland requested that the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) conduct an
administrative review of the following
producers and/or exporters of the
subject merchandise: SeAH Steel
Corporation (‘‘Seah’’); Hyundai HYSCO;
Husteel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Husteel’’); Daewoo
International Corporation; Miju Steel
Making Co.; Samsun Steel Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Samsun’’); Kukje Steel Co., Ltd.;
Nexteel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Nexteel’’); MSteel
Co., Ltd.; Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Kumkang’’); Histeel Co., Ltd.; Hyundai
Corporation; Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.;
Dong–A-Steel Co., Ltd.; Korea Iron &
Steel Co., Ltd.; Union Pipe
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Union Steel
Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Huanbohai Import &
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
42650
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 162 / Monday, August 24, 2009 / Notices
Export Co.; Huludao Steel Pipe
Industrial Co., Ltd.; Huludao City Steel
Pipe; Benxi Northern Steel Pipes Co.;
and Tianjin Shuangjie Steel Pipe Co. On
the same date, U.S. Steel requested the
Department conduct an administrative
review of the following producers of
subject merchandise: Husteel; Hyundai
HYSCO; Nexteel; Samsun; and Seah.
On December 24, 2008, the
Department initiated an administrative
review covering the period November 1,
2007, through October 31, 2008. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 73 FR 79055 (December 24, 2008).
Wheatland withdrew its request for a
review of Kumkang on July 31, 2009.
Wheatland is the only party to have
requested a review of Kumkang.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(l), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested a review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review or.
The Department may extend this
deadline if it determines that it is
reasonable to do so. Although
Wheatland withdrew its request for
Kumkang after the 90-day period, the
Department has not to date dedicated
extensive time and resources to this
review, only having recently issued a
supplemental questionnaire to
Kumkang. Therefore, in response to
Wheatland’s request, the Department
hereby rescinds the administrative
review for the period November 1, 2007,
through October 31, 2008, for Kumkang.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the companies
for which this review is rescinded, the
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of this notice of
partial rescission of administrative
review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:04 Aug 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as a final reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: August 18, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E4–20321 Filed 8–21–04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Federal Consistency Appeal by Villa
Marina Yacht Harbour, Inc.
AGENCY: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (Commerce).
ACTION: Notice of appeal.
SUMMARY: This announcement provides
notice that Villa Marina Yacht Harbour,
Inc. (Villa Marina) has filed an
administrative appeal with the
Department of Commerce requesting
that the Secretary override the Puerto
Rico Planning Board’s (PRPB) objection
to the proposed expansion of an existing
marina in Fajardo, Puerto Rico.
DATES: Comments must be sent to the
NOAA, Office of the General Counsel
for Ocean postmarked or e-mailed no
later than September 30, 2009. Requests
for a public hearing must be filed within
30 days of publication of this notice.
ADDRESSES: Materials from the appeal
record will be available at the NOAA,
Office of the General Counsel for Ocean
Services, 1305 East-West Highway,
Room 6111, Silver Spring, MD 20910
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and on the following Web site: https://
www.ogc.doc.gov/czma.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gladys P. Miles, Attorney-Advisor,
NOAA, Office of the General Counsel,
301–713–7384 or at
gcos.inquiries@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Notice of Appeal
Villa Marina has filed notice of an
appeal with the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary), pursuant to the Coastal
Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA),
16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., and
implementing regulations found at 15
CFR Part 930, Subpart H. The appeal is
taken from an objection by PRPB to
Villa Marina’s consistency certification
for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
permit for a marina expansion in
Fajardo, Puerto Rico.
Under the CZMA, the Secretary may
override PRPB’s objection on grounds
that the proposed activity is consistent
with the objectives or purposes of the
CZMA or otherwise necessary in the
interest of national security. To make
the determination that the proposed
activity is ‘‘consistent with the
objectives or purposes’’ of the CZMA,
the Secretary must find that: (1) The
proposed activity furthers the national
interest as articulated in sections 302 or
303 of the CZMA, in a significant or
substantial manner; (2) the adverse
effects of the proposed activity do not
outweigh its contribution to the national
interest, when those effects are
considered separately or cumulatively;
and (3) no reasonable alternative is
available that would permit the activity
to be conducted in a manner consistent
with enforceable policies of the PRPB’s
coastal management program. 15 CFR
930.121. Conversely, to make the
determination that the proposed activity
is ‘‘necessary in the interest of national
security,’’ the Secretary must find that a
national defense or other national
security interest would be significantly
impaired were the activity not permitted
to go forward as proposed. 15 CFR
930.122.
II. Opportunity for Federal Agency and
Public Comment
Pursuant to Department of Commerce
regulations, the public and interested
Federal agencies may submit comments
on this appeal. Written comments must
be sent no later than September 30, 2009
to the NOAA, Office of the General
Counsel for Ocean Services, 1305 EastWest Highway, Room 6111, Silver
Spring, MD 20910 or via e-mail to
gcos.comments@noaa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 162 (Monday, August 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42649-42650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E4-20321]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-580-809)
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea:
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 24, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Subler or Joe Shuler, at (202)
482-0189 or (202) 482-1293, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office 1,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), on December 1, 2008,
Wheatland Tube Company (``Wheatland'') and United States Steel
Corporation (``U.S. Steel''), manufacturers of the domestic like
product, timely requested an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from the Republic of
Korea for the period November 1, 2007, through October 31, 2008.
Wheatland requested that the Department of Commerce (the
``Department'') conduct an administrative review of the following
producers and/or exporters of the subject merchandise: SeAH Steel
Corporation (``Seah''); Hyundai HYSCO; Husteel Co., Ltd. (``Husteel'');
Daewoo International Corporation; Miju Steel Making Co.; Samsun Steel
Co., Ltd. (``Samsun''); Kukje Steel Co., Ltd.; Nexteel Co., Ltd.
(``Nexteel''); MSteel Co., Ltd.; Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd.
(``Kumkang''); Histeel Co., Ltd.; Hyundai Corporation; Dongbu Steel
Co., Ltd.; Dong-A-Steel Co., Ltd.; Korea Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.; Union
Pipe Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Union Steel Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Huanbohai
Import &
[[Page 42650]]
Export Co.; Huludao Steel Pipe Industrial Co., Ltd.; Huludao City Steel
Pipe; Benxi Northern Steel Pipes Co.; and Tianjin Shuangjie Steel Pipe
Co. On the same date, U.S. Steel requested the Department conduct an
administrative review of the following producers of subject
merchandise: Husteel; Hyundai HYSCO; Nexteel; Samsun; and Seah.
On December 24, 2008, the Department initiated an administrative
review covering the period November 1, 2007, through October 31, 2008.
See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 73 FR 79055 (December 24,
2008).
Wheatland withdrew its request for a review of Kumkang on July 31,
2009. Wheatland is the only party to have requested a review of
Kumkang.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(l), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review or. The
Department may extend this deadline if it determines that it is
reasonable to do so. Although Wheatland withdrew its request for
Kumkang after the 90-day period, the Department has not to date
dedicated extensive time and resources to this review, only having
recently issued a supplemental questionnaire to Kumkang. Therefore, in
response to Wheatland's request, the Department hereby rescinds the
administrative review for the period November 1, 2007, through October
31, 2008, for Kumkang.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For
the companies for which this review is rescinded, the antidumping
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of
this notice of partial rescission of administrative review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: August 18, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E4-20321 Filed 8-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S