Seventh Administrative Review of Honey From the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results, 41679-41680 [E9-19780]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Notices
• Participation in industry receptions
in New Delhi and Chennai and a
financing roundtable luncheon in
Mumbai; and
Monday
November 16 .................
Tuesday
November 17 .................
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
November 18 ...........
November 19 ...............
November 20 ....................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
All parties interested in participating
in the Energy Efficiency Trade Mission
to India must complete and submit an
application for consideration by the
Department of Commerce. All
applicants will be evaluated on their
ability to meet certain conditions and
best satisfy the selection criteria as
outlined below. The mission will be
open on a first come first served basis
to 12 qualified U.S. companies.
Fees and Expenses:
After a company has been selected to
participate on the mission, a payment to
the Department of Commerce in the
form of a participation fee is required.
The participation fee will be $3,500 for
small or medium-sized enterprises
(SME),* and $4,200 for large firms,
which includes one principal
representative. The fee for each
additional firm representative (large
firm or SME) is $750. Expenses for
lodging, some meals, incidentals, and
travel (except for transportation to and
from airports in-country, previously
noted) will be the responsibility of each
mission participant. The conference fee
is included in the trade mission cost.
Conditions for Participation:
• An applicant must submit a
completed and signed mission
application and supplemental
application materials, including
adequate information on the company’s
products and/or services, primary
market objectives, and goals for
participation.
* An SME is defined as a firm with 500 or fewer
employees or that otherwise qualifies as a small
business under SBA regulations (see https://
www.sba.gov/services/contracting opportunities/
sizestandardstopics/). Parent companies,
affiliates, and subsidiaries will be considered when
determining business size. The dual pricing
schedule reflects the Commercial Service’s user fee
schedule that became effective May 1, 2008 (for
additional information see https://www.export.gov/
newsletter/march2008/initiatives.html).
16:30 Aug 17, 2009
Proposed Mission Timetable
Companies will be encouraged to
arrive Saturday to allow time to rest
after their long trip and adjust to the
time change before the mission program
begins on Monday, November 16.
New Delhi Welcome briefing by U.S. Departments of Commerce and State, Participation in DOE/AID
Energy Efficiency Conference, One-on-one business matchmaking appointments, Networking reception.
New Delhi Participation in DOE/AID Energy Efficiency Conference, One-on-one business matchmaking appointments.
New Delhi/Chennai Morning flight to Chennai, One-on-one business matchmaking appointments,
Networking reception.
Chennai/Mumbai One-on-one business matchmaking appointments, Optional site visit, Evening flight
to Mumbai.
Mumbai One-on-one business matchmaking appointments, Roundtable on financing mechanisms for
energy efficiency projects in India.
Participation Requirements
VerDate Nov<24>2008
• Meetings with CS India’s energy
efficiency industry specialists in New
Delhi, Chennai and Mumbai.
41679
Jkt 217001
• Each applicant must also certify
that the products and services it seeks
to export through the mission are either
produced in the United States, or, if not,
marketed under the name of a U.S. firm
and have at least fifty-one percent U.S.
content.
Selection Criteria for Participation:
Selection will be based on the
following criteria:
• Suitability of a company’s products
or services to the mission’s goals
• Applicant’s potential for business
in India, including likelihood of exports
resulting from the trade mission
• Consistency of the applicant’s goals
and objectives with the stated scope of
the trade mission
Any partisan political activities
(including political contributions) of an
applicant are entirely irrelevant to the
selection process.
Timeframe for Recruitment and
Applications
Mission recruitment will be
conducted in an open and public
manner, including publication in the
Federal Register, posting on the
Commerce Department trade mission
calendar (https://www.ita.doc.gov/
doctm/tmcal.html) and other Internet
Web sites, press releases to general and
trade media, direct mail, notices by
industry trade associations and other
multiplier groups, and publicity at
industry meetings, symposia,
conferences, and trade shows.
Recruitment for the mission will begin
immediately and conclude no later than
September 30, 2009. The mission will
be open on a first come first served
basis. Applications received after that
date will be considered only if space
and scheduling constraints permit.
Contacts:
Houston Export Assistance Center:
Ms. Nyamusi Igambi,
Nyamusi.Igambi@mail.doc.gov, Ph:
713–209–3112, Fax: 713–209–3135.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S. Commercial Service in India: Mr.
Vaidyanathan Purushothaman, U.S.
Commercial Service Chennai, Ph: 91–
44–2857–4031, Fax: 91–44–2857–4212,
Vaidyanathan.purushothaman
@mail.doc.gov.
Sean Timmins,
Global Trade Programs, Commercial Service
Trade Missions Program.
[FR Doc. E9–19777 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–863]
Seventh Administrative Review of
Honey From the People’s Republic of
China: Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Blaine Wiltse, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone- (202)
482–6345.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 2, 2009, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published
a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of honey from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’),
covering the period December 1, 2007
through November 30, 2008. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 74 FR 5821 (February 2, 2009). On
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
41680
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Notices
March 6, 2009, after receiving comments
on U.S. Customs and Border Protection
data, the Department selected Anhui
Native Produce Import & Export Corp.
(‘‘Anhui Native’’) and Qinhuangdao
Municipal Dafeng Industrial Co., Ltd.
(‘‘QMD’’) as the mandatory respondents
for this review.
The Department sent its antidumping
questionnaire to Anhui Native and QMD
on March 9, 2009. The Department was
unable to deliver its questionnaire to
QMD due to incorrect addresses. See
Memorandum to the File from Blaine
Wiltse, Case Analyst, RE: Seventh
Administrative Review of Honey from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’):
Incorrect Addresses for QMD, dated
March 27, 2009. On March 30, 2009,
Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Dongtai Peak’’) requested treatment as
a voluntary respondent, and submitted
its Section A response to the
Department. On April 13, 2009, the
Department selected Dongtai Peak as a
voluntary respondent for this review.
On April 14, 2009, Dongtai Peak
submitted its Sections C and D response
to the Department. On April 15, 2009,
Anhui Native withdrew its participation
from the current review. On June 8,
2009, and June 16, 2009, the Department
sent its Supplemental Sections A, C,
and D Questionnaire and its Importer
Specific Supplemental Questionnaire to
Dongtai Peak. On July 8, 2009, and July
13, 2009, Dongtai Peak submitted its
response to the Department’s Importer
Specific Supplemental Questionnaire
and Supplemental Sections A, C, and D
Questionnaire. The preliminary results
of this administrative review are
currently due on September 2, 2009.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results
The Department determines that
completion of the preliminary results of
this review within the statutory time
period is not practicable. The
Department requires more time to gather
and analyze surrogate value information
pertaining to this company.
Additionally, the Department intends to
provide additional time for interested
parties to provide comments on
supplemental questionnaires and
suggested surrogate values. Lastly, the
Department requires additional time to
analyze the questionnaire responses and
to issue additional supplemental
questionnaires, if necessary. Therefore,
in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(‘‘Act’’), we are extending the time
period for issuing the preliminary
results of review by 60 days until
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:30 Aug 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
November 2, 2009.1 The final results
continue to be due 120 days after the
publication of the preliminary results.
This notice is published pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: August 12, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–19780 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–836]
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review:
Light–Walled Rectangular Pipe and
Tube From Mexico
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 18, 2009, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) made its preliminary
determination that Ternium Mexico
S.A. de C.V. (Ternium) is the successor–
in-interest to Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (Hylsa)
and should be treated as such for
antidumping duty cash deposit
purposes. See Notice of Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Light–Walled
Rectangular Pipe and Tube from
Mexico, 74 FR 28887 (June 18, 2009)
(Preliminary Results). For purposes of
these final results of review, the
Department has determined that
Ternium is the successor–in-interest to
Hylsa and, as a result, should be
accorded the same treatment previously
accorded to Hylsa in regard to the
antidumping duty order on light–walled
rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT)
from Mexico as of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Brian Davis, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
1 Sixty days from September 2, 2009, is November
1, 2009. However, Department practice dictates that
where a deadline falls on a weekend, the
appropriate deadline is the next business day. See
Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
7924, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 3, 2008, Ternium
requested that the Department conduct
a changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order of LWRPT from
Mexico to determine whether Ternium
is the successor–in-interest to Hylsa and
should be treated as such for
antidumping duty cash deposit
purposes. See Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Light–Walled
Rectangular Pipe and Tube from
Mexico, 73 FR 63686 (October 27, 2008)
(Notice of Initiation). On June 18, 2009,
the Department preliminarily
determined that Ternium is the
successor–in-interest to Hylsa and
should be treated as such for
antidumping duty cash deposit
purposes. See Preliminary Results.
On July 13, 2009, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice extending the time limit for these
final results to August 17, 2009. See
Light–Walled Rectangular Pipe and
Tube from Mexico; Extension of Time
Limit for Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review,
74 FR 33406 (July 13, 2009).
In the Preliminary Results, we stated
that interested parties could request a
hearing no later than 30 days after the
publication of the Preliminary Results,
submit case briefs to the Department no
later than 30 days after the publication
of the Preliminary Results, and submit
rebuttal briefs, limited to the issues
raised in those case briefs, five days
subsequent to the case briefs’ due date.
We did not receive any hearing requests
or comments on the Preliminary Results.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
is certain welded carbon quality light–
walled steel pipe and tube, of
rectangular (including square) cross
section, having a wall thickness of less
than 4 mm.
The term carbon–quality steel
includes both carbon steel and alloy
steel which contains only small
amounts of alloying elements.
Specifically, the term carbon–quality
includes products in which none of the
elements listed below exceeds the
quantity by weight respectively
indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or
2.25 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent
of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum,
or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30
percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of
lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30
percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41679-41680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19780]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-863]
Seventh Administrative Review of Honey From the People's Republic
of China: Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blaine Wiltse, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone- (202) 482-6345.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 2, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``Department'')
published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of honey
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''), covering the period
December 1, 2007 through November 30, 2008. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 5821 (February 2, 2009). On
[[Page 41680]]
March 6, 2009, after receiving comments on U.S. Customs and Border
Protection data, the Department selected Anhui Native Produce Import &
Export Corp. (``Anhui Native'') and Qinhuangdao Municipal Dafeng
Industrial Co., Ltd. (``QMD'') as the mandatory respondents for this
review.
The Department sent its antidumping questionnaire to Anhui Native
and QMD on March 9, 2009. The Department was unable to deliver its
questionnaire to QMD due to incorrect addresses. See Memorandum to the
File from Blaine Wiltse, Case Analyst, RE: Seventh Administrative
Review of Honey from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''):
Incorrect Addresses for QMD, dated March 27, 2009. On March 30, 2009,
Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd. (``Dongtai Peak'') requested
treatment as a voluntary respondent, and submitted its Section A
response to the Department. On April 13, 2009, the Department selected
Dongtai Peak as a voluntary respondent for this review. On April 14,
2009, Dongtai Peak submitted its Sections C and D response to the
Department. On April 15, 2009, Anhui Native withdrew its participation
from the current review. On June 8, 2009, and June 16, 2009, the
Department sent its Supplemental Sections A, C, and D Questionnaire and
its Importer Specific Supplemental Questionnaire to Dongtai Peak. On
July 8, 2009, and July 13, 2009, Dongtai Peak submitted its response to
the Department's Importer Specific Supplemental Questionnaire and
Supplemental Sections A, C, and D Questionnaire. The preliminary
results of this administrative review are currently due on September 2,
2009.
Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results
The Department determines that completion of the preliminary
results of this review within the statutory time period is not
practicable. The Department requires more time to gather and analyze
surrogate value information pertaining to this company. Additionally,
the Department intends to provide additional time for interested
parties to provide comments on supplemental questionnaires and
suggested surrogate values. Lastly, the Department requires additional
time to analyze the questionnaire responses and to issue additional
supplemental questionnaires, if necessary. Therefore, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(``Act''), we are extending the time period for issuing the preliminary
results of review by 60 days until November 2, 2009.\1\ The final
results continue to be due 120 days after the publication of the
preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Sixty days from September 2, 2009, is November 1, 2009.
However, Department practice dictates that where a deadline falls on
a weekend, the appropriate deadline is the next business day. See
Notice of Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule
for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff
Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is published pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: August 12, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-19780 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S