Requirements and Procedures for Consumer Assistance To Recycle and Save Program, 37878-37920 [E9-17994]
Download as PDF
37878
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Parts 512 and 599
[Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0120]
RIN 2127–AK53
Requirements and Procedures for
Consumer Assistance To Recycle and
Save Program
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may obtain additional information about
the CARS program by calling the CARS
Hotline at 1–866–CAR–7891. It is
dedicated to calls about the program.
For non-legal issues, you may call, Mr.
Frank Borris, NHTSA Office of
Enforcement, telephone (202) 366–8089.
For legal issues, you may call David
Bonelli, NHTSA Office of Chief
Counsel, telephone (202) 366–5834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
This final rule sets forth
requirements and procedures for the
voluntary vehicle trade-in and
purchase/lease program under the
Consumer Assistance to Recycle and
Save Act of 2009. This program helps
consumers pay for a new, more fuel
efficient car or truck from a
participating dealer when they trade in
a less fuel efficient car or truck. The rule
establishes a process by which dealers
can register in order to participate in the
program and establishes the criteria this
agency will use to determine which
disposal facilities are eligible to receive
and either crush or shred the trade-in
vehicles. It also sets forth the criteria
that trade-in vehicles and new vehicles
must meet in order for purchases and
leases to qualify for assistance under
this program and establishes the
requirements that must be met by
consumers, dealers, disposal facilities
and others. Finally, the rule sets forth
enforcement procedures and provisions
for punishing fraud and other violations
of the program requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective July
29, 2009. Petitions: If you wish to
petition for reconsideration of this rule,
your petition must be received by
September 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: If you submit a petition for
reconsideration of this rule, you should
refer in your petition to the docket
number of this document and submit
your petition to: Administrator,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building,
Washington, DC 20590.
The petition will be placed in the
public docket. Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all documents
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the complete User Notice and
SUMMARY:
Privacy Notice for Regulations.gov at
https://www.regulations.gov/search/
footer/privacyanduse.jsp.
I. Background
II. Questions and Comments From the Public
About the CARS Program
III. Public Outreach and Consultation
IV. The Regulation
a. Definitions (§ 599.102)
b. Registration of Dealers (§ 599.200)
c. Identification of Disposal Facilities
(§ 599.201)
d. Determining Eligibility of Trade-in
Vehicles and New Vehicles (§ 599.300)
1. Vehicle Definitions
2. Eligibility of Trade-in Vehicles
3. Eligibility of New Vehicles
e. Requirements for Qualifying
Transactions (§§ 599.300 and 301)
1. Vehicle Categories and Credit Amounts
2. Special Requirements for Trade-in
Vehicles
3. Restrictions and Limitations on
Transactions
f. Requirements for Dealer Reimbursement
(§ 599.302–304)
g. Disposal of Trade-In Vehicles
(§ 599.400–403)
h. Enforcement (§ 599.500–517)
1. Prevention of Fraud
2. Civil Penalties and Other Sanctions
V. Confidential Information and Privacy
a. Determinations of the Confidentiality of
CARS Data Based on FOIA Exemptions
4 and 6
b. Approach—Class Determinations vs.
Individual Assessments
c. Class Determinations Based on FOIA
Exemption 4
d. Data Submitted to NHTSA for the CARS
Program
1. Manufacturer Data
2. Dealer Information and Transaction Data
3. Disposal Facility and Destruction Data
e. CARS Data Class Determinations Based
on FOIA Exemption 4
1. Manufacturer Assigned Dealer
Identification
2. Dealer Bank Name, ABA Routing
Number, Bank Account Number
3. CARS Dealer ID and CARS
Authorization Codes
f. Class Determination Based on FOIA
Exemption 6
VI. Costs and Benefits
VII. Statutory Basis for This Action
VIII. Effective Date
IX. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
I. Background
On June 24, 2009, the President
signed into law the Consumer
Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of
2009 (the CARS Act or the Act) (Pub. L.
111–32). The Act establishes, within the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA or the agency),
a temporary program under which an
owner of a motor vehicle meeting
statutorily specified criteria may trade
in the vehicle and receive a monetary
credit from the dealer toward the
purchase or lease of a new motor
vehicle meeting statutorily specified
criteria.
Generally, the trade-in vehicle must
have a combined fuel economy, as
determined by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), below a
specified value and the new vehicle
must have an EPA combined fuel
economy above a higher specified value.
(Combined fuel economy is an EPA
calculation representing the weighted
average of a vehicle’s city and highway
fuel economy as determined according
to the method described in EPA
regulations at 40 CFR 600.210–08(c)).
The program covers qualifying
transactions that occur between July 1,
2009 and November 1, 2009, so long as
funds appropriated by Congress are not
exhausted. If all of the conditions of
eligibility are met and the dealer
provides NHTSA with sufficient
documentation relating to the
transaction, NHTSA will make an
electronic payment to the dealer equal
to the amount of the credit extended by
the dealer to the consumer, not
exceeding the statutorily authorized
amount. The dealer must agree to
transfer the trade-in vehicle to a
disposal facility that will crush or shred
it so that it will never be returned to the
road, although parts of the vehicle, other
than the engine block and drive train
(unless the drive train is sold in separate
parts), may be sold.
The CARS Act requires the Secretary
of Transportation, acting through
NHTSA, to issue final regulations
within 30 days after enactment (i.e., by
July 24, 2009), ‘‘notwithstanding’’ the
notice and comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553). The regulations must, among other
things: (1) Provide for a means of
registering dealers for participation in
the program; (2) establish procedures for
reimbursement of dealers participating
in the program; (3) require that dealers
use the credit in addition to any other
rebate or discount advertised by the
dealer or offered by the manufacturer
and prohibit the dealer from using the
credit to offset any such other rebate or
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
discount; (4) require that dealers
disclose to the person trading in an
eligible vehicle the best estimate of the
scrappage value of such vehicle and
permit dealers to retain $50 of the
amount paid for the scrappage value as
payment for any administrative costs of
participation in the program; (5)
establish requirements and procedures
for the disposal of eligible trade-in
vehicles; and (6) provide for the
enforcement of penalties for violations
of the program requirements.
Separate from the rulemaking
requirement, the CARS Act directs the
agency to establish a Web site to convey
information about the program,
including instructions on how to
determine if a vehicle is an eligible
trade-in vehicle, how to participate in
the program and how to determine if a
dealer is participating in the program.
The agency established this Web site at
https://www.cars.gov. Among other
things, the Web site contains an
interactive tool for determining eligible
vehicles, a list of participating dealers
and disposal facilities, responses to
frequently asked questions, and
information on how to determine the
EPA combined fuel economy of trade-in
vehicles and of new vehicles. In
addition, NHTSA set up a hotline ((866)
227–7891) to answer questions about
the program and, on July 2, 2009,
published a document in the Federal
Register (74 FR 31812) providing
additional useful information, in
advance of issuance of this final rule.
The Act provides that the program
covers eligible transactions beginning
on July 1, 2009, prior to today’s final
rule. NHTSA advised the public through
the July 2 Federal Register document,
the Web site, and the hotline that it was
prudent to wait until the details of the
program were specified in today’s final
rule. Nevertheless, if transactions
occurring on or after July 1, 2009, but
before today’s final rule, meet all of the
requirements identified in this final
rule, registered dealers may follow the
application procedures of the rule and
apply for reimbursement for those
transactions. To expedite processing,
the rule relies, wherever possible, on
electronic submissions through secure
agency Web sites.
In order to implement this new
program, NHTSA has had to quickly
create a new organization. NHTSA has
established the Office of the Car
Allowance Rebate System within the
Office of Enforcement. The new office
will consist of three divisions. The
Transaction Oversight Division will
work closely with the contractor
NHTSA has retained to review incoming
requests for payment from dealers to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
ensure that those requests are reviewed
correctly and in a timely way. The Data
Analysis and Reporting Division will
review data generated in connection
with the program to help ensure the
system’s efficiency and detect problems
with the process or indications of
potential compliance issues. That
division will also produce reports on all
aspects of the system. The Compliance
Division will work to detect and deter
possible noncompliance related to the
program and coordinate closely with
NHTSA’s Office of Chief Counsel when
possible violations are found. That
division will also coordinate closely
with the DOT’s Office of Inspector
General on issues related to possible
fraud in connection with the program.
The agency also has decided to use
the name Car Allowance Rebate System
(CARS) for its program implementing
the Act. The use of the term ‘‘rebate’’ in
the name NHTSA has chosen for the
program is not intended to have any
effect on how CARS transactions are
treated under State or Federal tax laws.
The CARS Act provides that the credit
is not income to the purchaser, but does
not address any other possible tax
issues. NHTSA lacks expertise and
authority in tax matters and makes no
attempt here to provide any guidance on
those matters.
II. Questions and Comments From the
Public About the CARS Program
During the period between enactment
of the CARS Act and publication of
today’s rule, the agency received
numerous questions and comments
about various provisions of the Act. The
final rule seeks to address these
comments and questions, and details
appear later in this document. However,
the agency provides here a brief
summary discussion of some of the
issues raised. As noted earlier, NHTSA’s
Web site for the CARS program contains
responses to frequently asked questions
by members of the public.
The CARS program assists consumers
who trade in their older, less fuel
efficient vehicles for new, more fuel
efficient vehicles. The program is
designed to remove these older, less fuel
efficient vehicles from the road, by
requiring the trade-in vehicle to be
crushed or shredded. Some consumers
were unaware that their trade-in vehicle
must be destroyed as a statutory
condition of participating in this
program. Because of that condition,
consumers purchasing or leasing a new
vehicle under this program should not
expect to receive the full trade-in value
of their old vehicle when negotiating
with a dealer.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37879
As detailed below, the program has
different requirements for different
types of trade-in vehicles (e.g.,
passenger cars, SUVs and vans, pickups,
and trucks) because these vehicles have
varying levels of EPA combined fuel
economy. In general, passenger cars
have the highest combined fuel
economy. Therefore, even though a
passenger car may be quite old and/or
in poor condition, it may not be an
eligible trade-in vehicle under the
program because its combined fuel
economy at the time of its manufacture
(as measured by the EPA) exceeds
statutory limits. Some consumers have
expressed surprise at this result.
However, the agency must follow the
requirements of the statute. Larger, older
pickups and SUVs, on the other hand,
do not typically have very high fuel
economy. The statutory requirements
for trading in these vehicles are less
strict than for trading in passenger cars.
Consumers may find that more of the
vehicles in these categories are eligible
as trade-in vehicles under the program.
Questions have arisen as to which
persons are eligible to participate in the
program and whether a person can trade
in a vehicle owned by someone else,
such as a family member. The agency
has concluded that individuals as well
as legal entities, such as corporations
and partnerships, may participate in the
program. However, a person may not
trade in a vehicle owned by someone
else under the program. The Act’s oneyear insurance requirement is satisfied
so long as the trade-in vehicle is
insured, irrespective of the identity of
the person holding the insurance policy.
The specifics of these requirements are
explained later in this document.
The agency has received questions
regarding the value and disposition of
the trade-in vehicle. The CARS Act
specifies that while many parts of the
trade-in vehicle are permitted to be
removed and sold, in the end the
residual vehicle, including the engine
block, must be crushed or shredded.
Therefore, the trade-in value of the
vehicle is not likely to exceed its scrap
value. Purchasers should not expect to
receive the same trade-in value as they
might if the vehicle were to remain on
the road. The Act also requires dealers
to disclose to purchasers the scrap value
of the trade-in vehicle at the time of the
trade-in and allows dealers to retain up
to $50 of the scrap value of the vehicle
for their administrative costs of
participation in the program.
Some consumers have expressed
concern that the combined fuel
economy value of their vehicles, as
determined on the https://
fueleconomy.gov Web site of the EPA, is
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37880
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
not an accurate measure of the actual
fuel economy they experience. EPA
determines these values for each make,
model, and model year with regard to
each vehicle at the time of its
manufacture. These consumers contend
that if another means were used to
calculate combined fuel economy, their
vehicle would be an eligible trade-in
vehicle under the program. The CARS
Act is prescriptive in this regard, and
requires NHTSA to use the EPA
calculation, and not any other
calculation, to determine whether a
trade-in vehicle is eligible under the
program.
Some consumers have asked whether
they may participate in more than one
reimbursed transaction, either singly or
as joint-registered owners of a vehicle.
The CARS Act specifies that each
person may receive only one credit and
that only one credit may be issued to the
joint-registered owners of a single tradein vehicle under the program.
Consequently, a person may participate
in a transaction that receives a credit
under this program only once.
The CARS Act is specific as to the
characteristics of the vehicle that may
be traded in and the characteristics of
the new vehicle that may be purchased
or leased, and these two requirements
are interdependent (i.e., whether a new
vehicle is eligible under the program
depends, in part, on the characteristics
of the trade-in vehicle). For example,
the trade-in requirements for a large
work truck differ from those of
passenger cars under the program.
Similarly, some vehicles—notably
motorcycles—simply are not eligible
under the CARS Act, either as trade-in
vehicles or for purchase or lease, even
though consumers have noted that
transactions involving those vehicles
might reduce fuel use and improve the
environment.
III. Public Outreach and Consultation
The extremely short time afforded by
the Act to develop and complete this
rulemaking precluded publishing a
proposed rule for notice and comment.
Therefore, the agency took a variety of
steps to obtain public input as it moved
forward to develop this rule. It
established a Web site that invited
public inquiries. As it received
inquiries, it posted a steadily growing
list of questions and answers, which in
turn led to additional inquiries. It
hosted a ‘‘webinar’’ that elicited
hundreds of inquiries. In addition, it
met with representatives of a wide
variety of environmental interest
groups.
The agency also directly consulted
with organizations representing original
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
equipment manufacturers (OEMs),
including the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers and the Association of
International Automobile
Manufacturers, to obtain information on
franchised dealerships. The agency
involved the OEMs because they
possess comprehensive and readily
available lists of new vehicle dealers
licensed under State law. As detailed
below, the agency is using lists of
franchised dealers provided by the
OEMs to aid in the process of registering
dealers under the program.
NHTSA met with automobile dealers
and dealer organizations, including the
National Automobile Dealers
Association and the American
International Automobile Dealers
Association, to better understand the
typical vehicle trade-in and purchase/
lease transaction. The agency consulted
with groups representing disposal
facilities, salvage auctions, and
reporting entities, including the
American Salvage Pool Association, the
Automotive Recyclers Association,
CoPart, Mannheim, Insurance Auto
Auctions, the Institute of Scrap
Recycling Industries, Inc., and the
National Salvage Vehicle Reporting
Program, to learn about the processes
involved in recycling and scrapping old
vehicles. The information learned by the
agency from dealer and disposal facility
organizations was critical to an
informed rulemaking process.
The agency also consulted with
officials from Texas, California and
Germany. These officials provided
valuable information to the agency,
based on their experience administering
and enforcing similar vehicle purchase
and trade-in programs. Each of these
officials cautioned NHTSA that it would
need to be vigilant to guard against
fraud.
Finally, as required under the CARS
Act, the agency coordinated with
appropriate Federal agencies. With
respect to the National Motor Vehicle
Title Information System (NMVTIS), the
agency met with the Department of
Justice and its NMVTIS program
administrator, the American Association
of Motor Vehicle Administrators, to
develop procedures for updating the
NMVTIS to reflect the crushing or
shredding of trade-in vehicles under the
program. The agency consulted with the
EPA on the listing of categories of
eligible vehicles and on the listing of
disposal facilities and requirements and
procedures for the proper disposal of
refrigerants, antifreeze, mercury
switches, and other substances prior to
crushing or shredding the trade-in
vehicle. The agency also consulted with
EPA concerning a method to disable the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
engines of the vehicles that are traded
in.
Memoranda providing the dates and
summaries of meetings with these
organizations and various other groups
are included in the docket for this rule.
IV. The Regulation
As directed by the CARS Act, today’s
final rule sets forth requirements and
procedures for registering participating
dealers and listing participating
disposal facilities, reimbursing dealers
for qualifying transactions, disposing of
trade-in vehicles, and enforcing
penalties for program violations.
The rule is being issued without first
providing a notice and an opportunity
for public comment. As noted above, the
Act provides that the rule shall be
issued within 30 days after enactment,
‘‘notwithstanding’’ the requirements of
5 U.S.C. 553, the Federal law requiring
notice and comment. Further, given that
schedule and the necessity of quickly
beginning to implement this 4-month
program with a statutorily fixed end
date, the agency finds for good cause
that providing notice and comment is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. Drafting and issuing a proposed
rule, providing a period for public
comment, and addressing those
comments in the final rule would have
been highly impracticable in the time
available and would have substantially
delayed issuance of this final rule
beyond the legislatively mandated
issuance date of July 24. We think the
public interest is best served by issuing
this rule on the mandated date so that
its requirements are known and can be
followed by all participants. This is
especially true because transactions
since July 1 have been potentially
eligible for credits under this program.
The CARS Act prescribes a
rulemaking period of just 30 days before
the program is to be fully implemented
and capable of accommodating a
potentially very large number of
transactions. Mindful of this
requirement, the agency placed
significant emphasis on efficient
transaction processes and data
exchange. To that end, most of the
transactional requirements imposed by
today’s rule are met through electronic
online submissions. Where this is so,
the rule identifies the particular data or
information required in the electronic
submission and, in one case, refers to an
appendix with a facsimile of the
electronic form for easy reference.
The Act requires the agency to
develop certain lists to assist consumers
and dealers (e.g., a comprehensive list of
new fuel efficient vehicles meeting the
program requirements, a list of disposal
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
entities to which dealers may transfer
eligible trade-in vehicles). Here, the rule
makes use of references to the CARS
Web site for convenient reference to
these helpful lists.
Much of the CARS Act is specific and
directive. However, where a statutory
term or provision is not clear or gives
the agency discretion, the rule generally
strikes the balance in favor of an
interpretation that promotes smooth and
expeditious completion of transactions
or one that decreases opportunities for
fraud.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
a. Definitions (§ 599.102)
The CARS Act defines a dealer as a
person licensed by a ‘‘State’’ and
identifies an eligible trade-in vehicle in
terms of its insurance and registration
status under ‘‘State’’ law. Read together,
these statutory provisions restrict the
transactions that are eligible for a credit
under the CARS program. More
specifically, a dealer must be a United
States dealer and a trade-in vehicle must
be insured and registered in the United
States. However, nothing in the Act
excludes U.S. territories from the reach
of the program. Consequently, in section
599.102, the agency has defined ‘‘State’’
to include the 50 United States, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa,
and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands.
The CARS Act uses the term ‘‘person’’
to describe those eligible to purchase or
lease a new vehicle under the Program.
See Sections 1302(c–d). In the absence
of a definition of this term in the CARS
Act, the agency relies on the universal
definition that appears in 1 U.S.C. 1,
which includes corporations,
companies, associations, firms,
partnerships, societies, and joint stock
companies, as well as individuals. The
agency adopts this definition for the
term ‘‘person’’ in Section 599.102, and
also defines a ‘‘purchaser’’ in that
section as a person purchasing or
leasing a new vehicle under the CARS
program. Of course, each person is
subject to the statutory restriction that
precludes participation by any person in
this program more than once.
b. Registration of Dealers (§ 599.200)
The Act requires the agency to
provide for a means of registering
dealers for participation in the program.
(Section 1302(d)(1)). A dealer is defined
under the Act as a person licensed by
a State who engages in the sale of new
automobiles to ultimate purchasers
(Section 1302(i)(6)), a definition we
have restated in Section 599.102. After
consultation with dealer and OEM
organizations, the agency is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
implementing the dealer registration
requirement through a several step
process. First, on June 30, 2009, the
agency requested and later received a
list of franchised dealers from their
respective OEMs, including each
dealer’s legal business name, doingbusiness-as name, mailing address,
point of contact, and OEM franchise
identifier.1 OEM franchised dealers, as a
group, satisfy the requirement for State
licensing. The agency has learned that,
without an active OEM franchise
agreement, a dealer is unable to offer
manufacturer purchasing incentives and
may not be able, in some cases, to
extend the full manufacturer warranty
to the new vehicles it sells. For this
reason, the agency includes the
requirement for a currently active OEM
franchise agreement as part of the dealer
registration process. (The OEMs have
agreed to update this list weekly, to add
newly franchised dealerships and
remove dealerships that are no longer
under franchise agreement.) The agency
then contacted all listed dealers by mail,
providing instructions on how to
register under the program. Dealers
received separate letters and were
instructed to register separately for each
make of vehicle they sell. Section
599.200(b) identifies the required dealer
qualifications for registration, which
flow from the statutory requirement for
State licensing and from the need to
perform transactions electronically.
OEM franchised dealers should easily
satisfy these requirements.
As set forth in section 599.200(c),
dealers that have been contacted by mail
by the agency and that wish to
participate must register to do so
electronically, using the authorization
code and following the instructions
provided in the mailing, and fill out an
electronic screen providing, among
other things, name and contact
information and bank account and
routing data for receiving payment
under the program.2 The agency will
review this information to ensure
completeness, and verify that the dealer
has a still active franchise agreement
(based on the continuously updated list
provided by OEMs). Section 599.200(d)
sets forth the procedures for approving
and disapproving registration
applications. Section 599.200(d)(1)
provides that, where an application for
registration is approved, the agency will
notify the dealer of approval by e-mail,
providing a user identification and
1 The agency chose to involve the OEMs in this
process to eliminate the opportunity for
unscrupulous individuals or entities to identify
themselves as franchised dealers.
2 The registration process was made available to
dealers beginning on July 24, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37881
password with which to conduct
transactions, and add the dealer to the
list of registered dealers on its Web site
at https://www.cars.gov. Consumers may
consult this list to identify registered
dealers in their locality. Section
599.200(d)(2) provides that, where an
application for registration is rejected,
the agency will notify the dealer by email, and provide the reasons for
rejection. The agency anticipates that,
unless rejected, confirmation of
registration and addition to the list
should occur within 2 to 4 business
days after a dealer submits the required
information.
Section 599.200(e)(1) provides that
the agency may automatically revoke a
registration as a matter of course for
termination or discontinuance of a
franchise but the dealer’s registration
may be reinstated upon a dealer’s
showing of proper and adequate license
to sell new vehicles to ultimate
purchasers. Section 599.200(e)(2) states
that the agency may suspend or revoke
a dealer’s registration under the
procedures in Section 599.504. Section
599.200(f) requires a registered dealer to
immediately notify the agency of any
change in the registration information it
submitted or any change in the status of
its State license or franchise. Finally,
section 599.200(g) accommodates
transactions that occurred after July 1,
2009, but prior to the publication of
today’s final rule, by permitting
registration after a qualifying sale or
lease transaction has occurred.3
The agency believes that this process
is the most efficient and appropriate
method to register dealers consistent
with the requirements of the CARS Act.
The Act requires that a dealer be
licensed under State law, and the list
provided by OEMs ensures that this is
so. Using this list also allows the agency
to verify dealer registration information
in a timely manner. Since the OEMs
have agreed to provide weekly updated
lists, this process also will allow for
registration of newly franchised dealers
as they come into existence and the
discontinuance of registrations for
dealers that are no longer franchised.
Newly franchised dealers will be
contacted by mail with an authorization
code, as the agency becomes aware of
them from the weekly updated lists. A
dealer whose franchise has been
discontinued will be removed from the
agency’s list, and will no longer be
eligible to receive credits for
transactions under the program.
3 As discussed later in this document, other
requirements apply to these earlier transactions as
well.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37882
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
c. Identification of Disposal Facilities
(§ 599.201)
Under the Act, the agency is required
to provide a list of entities to which
dealers may transfer eligible trade-in
vehicles for disposal. (Section
1302(d)(5)). The Act also requires the
Secretary to coordinate with the
Attorney General to ensure that the
National Motor Vehicle Title
Information System (NMVTIS) is timely
updated to reflect the crushing or
shredding of trade-in vehicles and
appropriate reclassification of their
titles. (Section 1302(c)(2)(C)).
The agency met with groups
representing auto recyclers and other
disposal facilities and salvage auctions,
as well as officials from AAMVA and
the Department of Justice responsible
for administering the NMVTIS, to get an
understanding of the vehicle salvage
and disposal process. From those
meetings, the agency learned that there
is a wide range of entities involved in
various aspects of the vehicle salvage
and disposal business. The agency also
consulted with the EPA about the CARS
program and the requirement to produce
a list of disposal facilities for
disposition of the trade-in vehicles.
Mindful of environmental issues,
NHTSA sought to identify a universe of
disposal facilities that was attentive to
these concerns, while achieving the
objectives of the CARS program.
In the course of these consultations
and based on advice from EPA, the
agency identified the National Vehicle
Mercury Switch Recovery Program
(NVMSRP) as a comprehensive source
of disposal facilities generally
committed to meeting State and Federal
environmental laws. The NVMSRP was
established in 2006 under a
memorandum of understanding (MOU)
among the EPA, environmental groups,
manufacturers and disposal facilities, to
recover and recycle mercury switches
from end-of-life vehicles before they are
scrapped, crushed or shredded. This
purpose is in alignment with the CARS
Act’s requirement for proper vehicle
disposition, including the removal of
mercury switches. The MOU authorizes
the End of Life Vehicle Solutions
(ELVS), a corporation established by
vehicle manufacturers to carry out
responsibilities of the NVMSRP,
including establishing a process for
participants to enroll in the program
and maintaining a database of
participants who recover and submit
mercury switches.
Participants may enroll in the
program by registering with ELVS.
Information about ELVS can be found
on its Web site at https://
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
www.elvsolutions.org. Currently,
approximately 7,700 disposal facilities
are participants, and EPA estimates that
approximately 1,500 of these facilities
actively turn in the switches. The
agency has determined that disposal
facilities that are participants on the
ELVS list present the best assurance of
compliance with State and Federal
environmental laws.
With this in mind, NHTSA has
identified disposal facilities that are
ELVS participants for listing as
approved disposal facilities under this
program, and these disposal facilities
are listed on the agency’s Web site at
https://www.cars.gov/disposal. However,
some entities on this list may dispose of
mercury switches as part of their
business (for example, auto repair
businesses) but do not actually engage
in dismantling or recycling of vehicles.
Therefore, the fact that a facility is on
the list does not automatically ensure
that it is equipped to dispose of vehicles
properly. To be eligible for participation
in the CARS Program, a facility on the
ELVS list must be able to crush or shred
motor vehicles, either with its own
equipment or by use of a mobile
crusher. NHTSA was not able to obtain
accurate lists of all entities that have
this capacity within the time allowed,
but is informed that many of the entities
on the ELVS list are capable of at least
obtaining the services of a mobile
crusher. Dealers will have to inquire of
specific entities concerning their
capacity to crush or shred the vehicle.
Any facility that does participate will
have to certify that it has that capacity
to crush or shred and will dispose of the
vehicle through crushing or shredding.
These facilities must additionally
agree to turn in mercury switches in
accordance with the NVMSRP from any
CARS trade-in vehicles they accept (to
the extent the vehicles have such
switches), by certifying that they will do
so. In addition, because the CARS Act
directs the agency to ensure that
pollutants are removed from vehicles
and properly disposed of, that vehicles
are crushed or shredded, and that
NMVITS is updated to reflect the
disposition of the vehicle, as a condition
of participation in the program, the
listed participants must also agree to
remove pollutants from the CARS tradein vehicles in compliance with State
and Federal law, crush or shred the
vehicle, update NMVTIS to reflect the
disposition of the vehicle, and certify to
having done so. The certification
requires the disposal facility to certify
that it will dispose of refrigerants,
antifreeze, lead products, mercury
switches, and other toxic or hazardous
vehicle components prior to crushing or
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
shredding, in accordance with
applicable Federal and State
requirements. The rule does not impose
additional requirements; for example, it
does not require removal of all lead
products such as lead solder
connections that are ordinarily not
removed during the shredding process.
NHTSA is aware, from consultations
with EPA, that the State of Maine and
the U.S. territories are not participants
in the NVMSRP and that the ELVS list
contains no disposal facilities in these
areas. Maine has its own program for
recycling mercury switches, which is
comparable to the NVMSRP. Under
Maine law, a vehicle may not be
crushed without first removing and
properly disposing of mercury switches,
and disposal facilities are covered by
that law. NHTSA obtained a list of
disposal facilities in Maine from the
State Bureau of Motor Vehicles, and
these facilities are included along with
the ELVS facilities from other states, on
the agency’s Web site at https://
www.cars.gov/disposal. As a condition
of participating, these Maine facilities
must make the same certifications as
required of the ELVS facilities.
In the case of the U. S. Territories, the
agency is informed that participation in
ELVS is currently impracticable for cost
reasons related to sending mercury
switches to the Continental United
States. Therefore, the rule does not
include disposal facilities on the list for
the Territories, but allows dealers to
select disposal facilities within the
territories that are able to make the same
certifications required of the ELVS and
Maine facilities.
The agency plans to update this
disposal facility list periodically, to add
entities that become ELVS participants
and to remove entities that are no longer
ELVS participants or for other reasons
discussed elsewhere in this document.
The rule requires dealers to consult this
list on the CARS Web site at the time
of the transfer of the trade-in vehicle, as
an entity that does not appear on the list
on that date is not eligible to receive the
vehicle for crushing or shredding.4
One issue that has arisen is the
participation of entities that shred
vehicles in the CARS process. Shredders
turn crushed vehicles into materials
useful in various industrial processes.
Shredders are relatively few in number,
with less than 300 shredding machines
distributed nationwide. Disposal
facilities with shredders may be ELVS
participants and, if they are, they can
4 Participants in the CARS program are cautioned
to consult the list on NHTSA’s CARS Web site,
https://www.cars.gov/disposal, for eligible disposal
facilities, not the list on the ELVS Web site.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
participate fully in the CARS program.
To the extent these facilities are not
ELVS participants, they may still play a
role in the ultimate disposition of the
vehicle. The final rule places no
restrictions on a trade-in vehicle once it
is crushed. Once crushed, the agency
assumes the vehicle will be transferred
to a shredder so that its materials can be
recycled. The rule does not require any
tracking of this ultimate shredding of a
crushed vehicle, so the entity receiving
the crushed vehicle for shredding does
not have to submit a CARS certification
form.
Because of the requirement, discussed
later in this document, that dealers must
disable the trade-in vehicle’s engine
prior to transferring the vehicle to a
disposal facility, the agency believes
that the statutory interest in ensuring
that the vehicle is not returned to use on
the road in this or any other country is
largely met before it leaves the dealer’s
possession. Prior engine disablement
reduces the likelihood that a trade-in
vehicle will be returned to use as an onroad automobile. With the extra
assurance provided by engine
disablement, the smooth operation of
the program is better served if
limitations on participation in the
disposal stream are kept to a minimum,
ensuring a reasonable geographic
distribution of entities that may receive
trade-in vehicles from dealers under the
program.
With these points in mind, the agency
consulted with representatives of the
salvage auction industry. The agency
believes it is practicable to provide for
the participation of salvage auctions in
the transfer of trade-in vehicles to
disposal facilities under the CARS
program, in order to broaden the
avenues of disposal available to dealers.
Therefore, salvage auctions may receive
a CARS trade-in vehicle, provided that,
as a condition of participation, these
entities agree to limit their auction sales
of CARS trade-in vehicles to the
disposal facilities described above that
appear on the agency’s list. We believe
that including listed disposal facilities,
and requiring salvage auctions to sell at
auction the scrap trade-in vehicles only
to approved disposal facilities strikes
the appropriate balance between
program and environmental
accountability, on the one hand, and
geographic distribution and dealer
access, on the other.
NHTSA was unable to develop a
comprehensive list of salvage auctions
within the time allowed. Although we
heard from representatives of some of
the largest auctions and their
associations (including CoPart,
Mannheim, the Insurance Auto
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Auctions, and the Automotive Salvage
Pool Association), we concluded that
simply listing their members, absent
more information, would not be
appropriate. However, we understand
from representatives of those
organizations and companies that they
and their members are willing to restrict
the sale of CARS trade-in vehicles to
just those entities on the CARS program
disposal facility list and make the
necessary certifications about the
disposal of those vehicles. Any other
salvage auctions willing to abide by
these restrictions and submit the
necessary forms and certifications under
penalty of law may participate in the
CARS program. All participants must
understand the specific requirements of
this rule and the substantial penalties
they may incur if they violate it or
submit false information in connection
with the program. Also, all who
participate must understand that their
records, premises, and CARS vehicles in
their possession are subject to
inspection by NHTSA and the DOT
Office of Inspector General.
Section 599.201 implements the
requirements for identification of
salvage auctions and disposal facilities.
Section 599.201(a) identifies the
participating entities, including salvage
auctions, disposal facilities listed on the
agency’s Web site, and disposal
facilities in the U.S. territories. Section
599.201(b) describes the conditions
these entities must follow in order to
participate in the program.
d. Determining Eligibility of Trade-in
Vehicles and New Vehicles (§ 599.300)
The CARS Act prescribes detailed
requirements concerning eligible tradein vehicles and eligible new vehicles for
qualifying transactions under the
Program. This final rule implements
these requirements in close adherence
to the statutory language.
1. Vehicle Definitions
The CARS Act divides eligible tradein vehicles and new vehicles into four
groups: passenger automobiles, category
1 trucks, category 2 trucks, and category
3 trucks.5 The term ‘‘passenger
5 Section 1302(i) of the CARS Act defines those
categories largely with reference to statutory
categories of vehicles subject to the Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards as
follows: ‘‘passenger automobile’’ means a passenger
automobile, as defined in section 32901(a)(18) of
title 49, United States Code, that has a combined
fuel economy value of at least 22 miles per gallon;
‘‘category 1 truck’’ means a non-passenger
automobile, as defined in section 32901(a)(17) of
title 49, United States Code, that has a combined
fuel economy value of at least 18 miles per gallon,
except that such term does not include a category
2 truck; ‘‘category 2 truck’’ means a large van or a
large pickup, as categorized by the Secretary using
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37883
automobile’’ and its definition are taken
from the agency’s fuel economy statute.
The definition excludes vehicles that
NHTSA has determined are (1) not
manufactured primarily for transporting
persons and (2) vehicles that are capable
of off-highway operation. Vehicles not
manufactured primarily for transporting
persons include pickup trucks and
certain vehicles that permit expanded
use of the vehicle for cargo-carrying
purposes, including vehicles which are
designed to transport more than 10
persons; provide temporary living
quarters, transport property on an open
bed, provide greater cargo-carrying than
passenger-carrying volume, or permit
expanded use of the automobile for
cargo-carrying purposes or other
nonpassenger-carrying purposes. (See
49 CFR 523.5(a)).
Vehicles that are capable of offhighway operation include three groups
of vehicles. (See 49 CFR 523.5(b)). The
first includes vehicles that have 4-wheel
drive and have at least four out of five
specified physical characteristics
relating to ground clearance.6 The
second includes vehicles that are rated
at more than 6,000 pounds gross vehicle
weight and have at least four out of five
specified physical characteristics
relating to ground clearance, but do not
have 4-wheel drive. The third includes
2-wheel drive SUVs (regardless of
GVWR) which came in a 4-wheel drive
version that met four of five specified
physical characteristics related to
ground clearance. Beginning with the
2011 model year, NHTSA will reclassify
this third group of vehicles as passenger
cars. See Average Fuel Economy
Standards—Passenger Cars and Light
Trucks—Model Year 2011, Section XI
(Vehicle Classification); 74 FR 14419,
March 30, 2009. Although neither
specified nor prohibited in the CARS
Act, the agency has concluded that it is
most appropriate to define passenger
the method used by the Environmental Protection
Agency and described in the report entitled
‘‘Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel
Economy Trends: 1975 through 2008’’; ‘‘category 3
truck’’ means a work truck, as defined in section
32901(a)(19) of title 49, United States Code. Under
regulations implementing the CAFE program (see
49 CFR Part 523), ‘‘passenger automobiles’’
currently include all passenger cars and ‘‘nonpassenger automobiles’’ include all SUVs, vans and
pickup trucks up to 8,500 pounds GVWR.
6 The five ground clearance characteristics are: (1)
An approach angle of not less than 28 degrees; (2)
a breakover angle of not less than 14 degrees; (3)
a departure angle of not less than 20 degrees; (4)
a running clearance of not less than 20 centimeters;
and (5) front and rear axle clearances of not less
than 18 centimeters each. These characteristics are
calculated when the automobile is at curb weight,
on a level surface, with the front wheels parallel to
the automobile’s longitudinal centerline, and the
tires inflated to the manufacturer’s recommended
pressure. See 49 CFR Part 523.5(b)(2).
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37884
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
cars using the NHTSA regulations and
policy which are applicable to 2010 and
earlier model year vehicles. Therefore,
the third group of vehicles will continue
to be classified as trucks for CARS
purposes (and will be excluded from the
definition of a passenger automobile).
A ‘‘category 1 truck’’ is a nonpassenger automobile. This category
includes sport utility vehicles (SUVs),
medium-duty passenger vehicles,7 small
and medium pickup trucks, minivans,
and small and medium passenger and
cargo vans. It does not include vehicles
that are defined as category 2 trucks.8
A ‘‘category 2 truck’’ is a large van or
a large pickup truck, based upon the
length of the wheelbase (more than 115
inches for pickup trucks and more than
124 inches for vans). If the vehicle
nameplate contains a variety of
wheelbases, the size classification is
determined by considering only the
shortest wheelbase produced. In
addition, some pickup trucks and cargo
vans which exceed these thresholds are
treated as category 3 trucks instead of
category 2 trucks.
A ‘‘category 3 truck’’ is a work truck
and is rated between 8,500 and 10,000
pounds gross vehicle weight. This
category includes very large pickup
trucks (those with cargo beds 72 inches
or more in length) and very large cargo
vans.
As previously stated, for category 1
and 2 trucks with a variety of
wheelbases, the size classification is
determined by considering only the
shortest wheelbase produced. If a
secondary manufacturer modifies and
introduces into commerce a vehicle
with only a limited portion of the
7 Medium-duty passenger vehicles are defined in
49 CFR 523.2.
8 As noted in footnote 2, the statutory definition
of the term ‘‘category 2 truck’’ is based on the
categorization method used by the Environmental
Protection Agency and described in the report
entitled ‘‘Light-Duty Automotive Technology and
Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2008.’’ (A copy
of this report has been placed in the docket for this
rule.) Based on that method of categorization, large
vans and pickup trucks, which would otherwise fall
within category 1, instead fall within category 2.
The method is based primarily on published
wheelbase data according to the following criteria:
A small pickup is less than 105″, a midsize pickup
is 105″ to 115″, a large pickup is more than 115″;
A small van is less than 109″, a midsize van is 109″
to 124″, a large van is more than 124″; A small SUV
is less than 100″, a midsize SUV is 100″ to 110″,
a large SUV is more than 110″. This classification
scheme is similar to that used in many trade and
consumer publications.
For those vehicle nameplates with a variety of
wheelbases, the size classification was determined
by considering only the smallest wheelbase
produced. The classification of a vehicle for this
report is based on the author’s engineering
judgment and is not a replacement for definitions
used in implementing automotive standards
legislation. [Emphasis added.]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:06 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
wheelbases offered by the original
equipment manufacturer (OEM), the
size classification for the secondary
manufacturer will be determined by
(and consistent with) the size
classification determined for the OEM.
For example, if General Motors
produces 2008 model year Chevrolet
Colorado pickup trucks with wheelbases
of 111, 119 and 126 inches, Colorado
pickup trucks would be classified as
category 1 trucks for CARS purposes
(because the shortest wheelbase
Colorado pickup truck was less than or
equal to 115 inches). If a secondary
manufacturer introduces into commerce
2008 model year Colorado ZZZ vehicles
(high performance Colorado pickups
with 126 inch wheelbase only),
Colorado ZZZ models would also be
classified as a category 1 pickup trucks.
The rule defines these four groups of
vehicles in section 599.102 and makes
use of these categories throughout
sections 599.300(f) and 599.300(g).
2. Eligibility of Trade-in Vehicles
The CARS Act establishes four criteria
for an eligible trade-in vehicle. The
trade-in vehicle must:
(1) Be in drivable condition;
(2) Have been continuously insured,
in accordance with State law, and
registered in the same owner’s name for
the one-year period immediately prior
to the trade-in;
(3) Have been manufactured not
earlier than 25 years before the date of
trade-in 9 and, in the case of a category
3 vehicle, also be from a model year not
later than model year 2001; and
(4) Have a combined fuel economy
value of 18 miles per gallon or less,10 if
it is a passenger automobile, a category
1 truck, or a category 2 truck.11
The agency must have a means of
evaluating these criteria as it determines
whether a transaction qualifies under
this program.
(i) ‘‘Drivable Condition’’
The agency intends that ‘‘drivable
condition’’ be demonstrated by several
means. First, it must be confirmed by
the trade-in vehicle being operated,
under its own power, by the dealer on
public roads on the date the vehicle is
traded in. The dealer must then certify
9 This means that all pre-model year 1984
vehicles, and most model year 1984 vehicles, are
not eligible as trade-in vehicles.
10 As discussed in later in this preamble, under
‘‘Requirements for qualifying transactions,’’ the
combined fuel economy of the trade-in vehicle must
satisfy the statutory requirements related to the
difference between its fuel economy and that of the
new vehicle, as well as meeting this 18 miles per
gallon absolute threshold.
11 There is no minimum for category 3 trucks
because they do not have fuel economy ratings.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to the operation of the vehicle when it
submits its request for reimbursement.
Separately, the person trading in the
vehicle must certify that it is in drivable
condition. This latter certification also
must be submitted by the dealer with its
application requesting reimbursement.
This approach is adopted in section
599.300(b)(1) of the final rule, and the
required dealer and purchaser
certifications are contained in the
Summary of Sale/Lease and
Certifications (Appendix A,
certifications section). Note that the
Summary of Sale/Lease and
Certifications form has two
components—a section for the dealer to
input information summarizing the
terms of the sale or lease transaction and
a section containing certifications that
must be made by both the dealer and the
purchaser. The section summarizing the
transaction is discussed later in this
notice.
(ii) Insurance
In addressing the requirement that the
trade-in vehicle be ‘‘continuously
insured consistent with the applicable
State law’’ for a period of not less than
one year prior to the transaction, the
agency notes the complication that not
all States require vehicle owners to
purchase automobile insurance
coverage. Several States provide vehicle
owners with the option, for example, to
post a surety bond, leave a cash deposit
or self-insure in lieu of purchasing
automobile insurance. Two States have
little or no insurance requirements.
The agency recognizes that insurance
requirements differ throughout the
country. However, the agency believes
that the Act requires the continuous
one-year insurance condition to be met
as a threshold matter, with respect to
any trade-in vehicle under the program.
In a State where the conditions and
requirements of insurance are specified
in law (e.g., liability minimums,
deductible requirements), the insurance
coverage would then need to be in
accordance with those conditions and
requirements. To qualify under this
requirement, a purchaser must provide
proof of insurance covering the trade-in
vehicle for a period of at least one year
prior to the date of the trade-in.
The agency is aware that, in some
cases, consumers may have insurance
cards that state clearly the period of
insurance coverage, while in other
cases, an insurance card is unavailable
or does not convey the period-ofcoverage information. To provide for an
alternative, the agency consulted with
several insurance associations,
including the Insurance Information
Institute, American Insurance
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Association, National Association of
Mutual Insurance Companies, and
Property Casualty Insurers Association
of America. These entities agreed to
assist the agency through their member
insurance companies. They indicated
that purchasers could contact their
insurers to obtain proof of insurance in
a form that provides the details needed
to identify the insured vehicle and the
one year period of coverage required
under the program.
To implement this process, the agency
is requiring the owner of the trade-in
vehicle to provide proof, at the time the
vehicle is traded in, that the trade-in
vehicle has been insured continuously
for one year prior to the trade-in. This
proof may take one of three forms. The
proof may consist of one or more
insurance cards containing the make,
model, model year, and vehicle
identification number (VIN) of the
insured vehicle, but only if, taken
together, the cards display on their face
a continuous one-year period of
insurance coverage. The proof may also
consist of insurance policy documents
(e.g., declarations pages) showing the
same information. Finally, the proof
may consist of a signed letter, on
insurance company letterhead,
identifying the same vehicle
identification information (i.e., make,
model, model year, and VIN) of the
insured vehicle and the period of
continuous coverage, which must be for
at least one year prior to the date of the
trade-in. In addition, for each of the
three options, the consumer must certify
that the trade-in vehicle has been
continuously insured for the requisite
period. This proof of insurance, along
with the consumer certification, must be
submitted by the dealer in its
application to the agency requesting
reimbursement. Section 599.300(b)(2)
and Appendix A, certifications section,
implement these requirements.
(iii) Registration
The requirement that the trade-in
vehicle be registered to the same owner
for a continuous period of one year prior
to the transaction requires clarification.
The agency interprets this provision as
requiring the trade-in vehicle to be
registered to and owned by the person
purchasing or leasing the new vehicle
under the program. In a transaction
involving more than one person, the
trade-in vehicle must have been
registered to and owned by at least one
of the persons purchasing or leasing the
vehicle under the program.
To qualify under this requirement, the
purchaser will need to provide proof of
registration covering the trade-in vehicle
for a period of at least one year prior to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
the date of the trade-in. The agency
recognizes that this proof of registration
presents complications for purchasers.
In several States, registration cards or
documents do not indicate a period of
coverage of more than one year. In some
of these States, purchasers have a
difficult time obtaining prior
registration information from the State.
Seeking a less burdensome alternative,
the agency evaluated the capabilities of
commercial vehicle information
services, such as Polk and Experian, to
determine the type of vehicle
information that is readily available to
consumers. The agency discovered that
purchasers may obtain a history of
vehicle registration information from
these services.
To implement this process, the agency
has determined that proof of registration
may be demonstrated by any of the
following: a current State registration
document or series of registration
documents in the name of the purchaser
evidencing registration for a period of
not less than one year immediately prior
to the trade-in; a current State
registration document showing
registration in the name of the purchaser
and a document of title that confers title
on the purchaser not less than one year
immediately prior to the trade-in; or a
current State registration document
showing registration in the name of the
purchaser and a document from a
commercially available vehicle history
provider evidencing registration for a
period of not less than one year
immediately prior to the trade-in.
Changes in ownership during this
period to delete a co-owner due to death
or divorce do not interrupt the
continuity of the registration, so long as
the purchaser has been shown as an
owner on the registration for the entire
period. In addition, for each of the three
options, the consumer must certify that
the trade-in vehicle was continuously
registered for the requisite period. This
proof of registration, along with the
consumer certification, must be
submitted by the dealer in its
application to the agency requesting
reimbursement. Section 599.300(b)(3)
and Appendix A, certifications section,
implements these requirements.
(iv) Manufacture Date
The requirement that the trade-in
vehicle be manufactured not earlier than
25 years before the date of trade-in is
straightforward, and is implemented in
section 599.300(b)(4). Ordinarily, the
model year of the vehicle, which
appears on the title, will serve to satisfy
this requirement. Where that
information is inconclusive (e.g., certain
model year 1984 and 1985 vehicles), the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37885
month and year of manufacture may be
retrieved from the safety standard
certification label that appears on the
frame or edge of the driver’s door in
most vehicles. The rule allows the 25year period to be satisfied provided it
falls any time within the month that the
vehicle is traded in. Section 599.300(f)
implements the additional requirement,
in the case of a category 3 vehicle, that
the trade-in vehicle be manufactured
not later than model year 2001. The
dealer must certify that the trade-in
vehicle meets this manufacturing date
requirement. (Appendix A,
certifications section).
(v) Combined Fuel Economy
The specified combined fuel economy
rating of 18 mpg or less for the trade-in
vehicle (excepting category 3 vehicles)
is implemented throughout sections
599.300(f) and 599.300(g).12 Under the
Act, combined fuel economy for an
eligible trade-in vehicle is defined as the
number posted under the words
‘‘Estimated New EPA MPG’’ and above
the word ‘‘Combined’’ for vehicles of
model year 1984 through 2007, or
posted under the words ‘‘New EPA
MPG’’ and above the word ‘‘Combined’’
for vehicles of model year 2008 or later
on the fueleconomy.gov Web site of the
Environmental Protection Agency for
the make, model, and year of such
vehicle. (Section 1302(i)(5)(B)). The
agency adopts this definition in section
599.102, but includes language limiting
its application to combined fuel
economy based on gasoline. This
treatment of trade-in vehicles is
consistent with the CARS Act
requirements for defining the combined
fuel economy of new vehicles.13
EPA changed the way it calculated
fuel economy ratings starting in Model
Year 2008, and has estimated the
revised ratings for Model Years 1985–
2007. Therefore, as described above,
eligibility is determined by the revised
ratings rather than the original EPA
sticker on the vehicle. Since the revised
ratings reflect a lower fuel economy,
vehicles that would not be eligible
under their original EPA rating may
qualify for trade-in.
3. Eligibility of New Vehicles
The Act specifies that a new vehicle
must be a passenger automobile, a
category 1 truck, a category 2 truck, or
12 The trade-in vehicle is also subject to statutory
requirements related to the difference between its
combined fuel economy and that of the new
vehicle.
13 As described later in this document, the
combined fuel economy of new vehicles is derived
from the Monroney label, which lists only fuel
economy based on gasoline.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37886
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
a category 3 truck. The characteristics of
these vehicles were described earlier
under Section c.1, ‘‘Vehicle
Definitions,’’ and they are defined in
section 599.102. To further assist
consumers in determining the eligibility
of new vehicles, the CARS Web site, at
https://www.cars.gov, contains an
interactive tool. Consumers may
identify their trade-in vehicle, select a
new vehicle, and determine whether the
transaction qualifies for a credit (and the
amount of the credit) under the
program.
In addition to the definitional
categories, the new vehicle purchased or
leased under the program must achieve
a minimum combined fuel economy
level. For new passenger automobiles
the combined fuel economy must be at
least 22 miles per gallon, for category 1
trucks it must be at least 18 miles per
gallon, and for category 2 trucks it must
be at least 15 miles per gallon. Category
3 trucks have no minimum fuel
economy requirement. Under the Act,
combined fuel economy for new
vehicles is defined as the number,
expressed in miles per gallon, centered
below the words ‘‘Combined Fuel
Economy’’ on the label required to be
affixed or caused to be affixed on a new
automobile pursuant to subpart D of
part 600 of title 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (‘‘Monroney Label’’).
(Section 1302(i)(5)(A)). The agency
adopts this definition, without change,
in section 599.102.
The new vehicle must also have a
manufacturer’s suggested retail price
(MSRP) of $45,000 or less to be eligible
for purchase or lease under the program.
The agency interprets this requirement
to be the base MSRP—the price on the
Monroney label affixed to the vehicle
before any dealer accessories, optional
equipment, taxes or destination charges
are added to the price. This
interpretation is consistent with the
Automobile Information Disclosure Act,
which identifies the retail price
separately from the retail delivered
price with optional equipment. See 15
U.S.C. 1232(f)(1). To implement this
approach, we have added a definition of
the term MSRP in section 599.102 and
stated the limitation in section
599.300(c)(2).
The CARS Act allows the new vehicle
to be either purchased or leased. In the
case of a lease, the Act requires the lease
to be for a period of not less than 5
years. The agency implements this
requirement in section 599.300(c)(1).
Additionally, the agency has added a
definition of ‘‘lease’’ in section 599.102,
specifying its minimum duration and
making clear that a lease that
incorporates a balloon payment at any
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
time prior to five years does not meet
the statutory requirement.
e. Requirements for Qualifying
Transactions (§§ 599.300 and 301)
1. Vehicle Categories and Credit
Amounts
The preceding section described
eligibility requirements for the trade-in
vehicle and for the purchased or leased
new vehicle. Under the CARS Act, a
transaction does not qualify for a credit
unless the trade-in vehicle and the new
vehicle, considered together, satisfy all
requirements. In addition, the amount of
the credit (either $3,500 or $4,500) is
dependent on the category and fuel
economy of the two vehicles making up
the transaction.
For example, in a transaction
involving a trade-in vehicle that is a
passenger automobile, a category 1
truck, or a category 2 truck and a new
vehicle that is a passenger automobile,
each meeting the eligibility criteria
discussed in the last section, if the new
vehicle has a combined fuel economy
that is 4 to 9 miles per gallon higher
than the trade-in vehicle, the credit is
$3,500. If the new vehicle has a
combined fuel economy that is at least
10 miles per gallon higher than the
trade-in vehicle, the credit is $4,500.
If the transaction involves a trade-in
vehicle that is a passenger automobile,
a category 1 truck, or a category 2 truck
and a new vehicle that is a category 1
truck each meeting the eligibility
criteria, a gain of 2 to 4 miles per gallon
results in a credit of $3,500; a gain of at
least 5 miles per gallon results in a
credit of $4,500.
In the case of a new category 2 or
category 3 truck, the trade-in vehicle
categories are different. For a new
category 2 truck, the trade-in vehicle
must be a category 2 or a category 3
truck. If the transaction involves two
category 2 trucks each meeting the
eligibility criteria, a gain of 1 mile per
gallon results in a credit of $3,500; a
gain of at least 2 miles per gallon results
in a credit of $4,500. A category 3 truck
that is traded in for a new category 2
truck is entitled to a $3,500 credit,
without fuel economy restriction.
(Category 3 trucks are not rated for fuel
economy by EPA.) A category 3 truck
that is traded in for another category 3
truck is entitled to a $3,500 credit if the
new vehicle is ‘‘smaller or similar in
size.’’ In view of the fact that Congress
has not spoken directly to the precise
meaning of this term, consistent with
available information, NHTSA has
incorporated this statutory requirement
as satisfied if the gross vehicle weight
rating of the new category 3 truck is no
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
greater than that of the trade-in category
3 truck.
The full universe of qualifying
transactions, together with the
corresponding amount of the credit, is
set forth in sections 599.300(f) and
599.300(g).
The CARS Act limits the amount of
funds that can be used to provide
credits for purchases or leases of work
trucks (category 3 trucks) to 7.5 percent
of the funds appropriated for the
program. Once that limit is reached,
NHTSA will stop making payments for
these transactions. The total amount
available for the program is $1 billion,
with $50 million available to the agency
to administer the program. NHTSA
intends to provide ongoing information
about the balance of funds remaining
available for these and all other
categories of transactions under the
program.14
2. Special Requirements for Trade-in
Vehicles
The CARS Act requires dealers to
disclose to purchasers trading in an
eligible vehicle the best estimate of the
scrap value of the vehicle, and permits
the dealer to retain $50 of any amount
paid to the dealer for scrappage of the
vehicle as payment for the
administrative costs of participation in
the program. The agency has restated
this requirement in section
599.300(d)(1) and in the dealer
certifications in Appendix A,
certifications section.
The CARS Act requires a dealer that
receives an eligible trade-in vehicle
under the program to certify to the
Secretary of Transportation, as
prescribed by rule, that the dealer will
transfer the vehicle (including the
engine block), ‘‘in such manner as the
Secretary prescribes,’’ to a entity that
will ensure that the vehicle will be
crushed or shredded, and will not be
sold, leased, or exchanged. While
Congress authorized the agency to
promulgate a rule, it did not define
‘‘manner’’ or otherwise speak directly to
its meaning. NHTSA interprets
‘‘manner’’ 15 to include the methods
14 NHTSA intends to maintain an up-to-date
running balance of available funds on the Web site
at https://www.cars.gov.
15 We note that a definition of manner is ‘‘the
mode or method in which something is done or
happens.’’ Webster’s Third New International
Dictionary 1376 (2002). Among the definitions of
mode are ‘‘a condition or state of being,’’ ‘‘a
particular form or variety of something’’ and ‘‘a
manner of doing something or of performing a
particular function or activity.’’ Ibid. at 1451. We
further note generally that, to the extent that there
are ambiguities or questions of interpretation in
statutes within an agency’s jurisdiction to
administer, Congress has delegated authority to the
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
applied by the dealer and the condition
of the vehicle transferred by the dealer.
Specifically, the agency is prescribing in
today’s rule that the dealer is to transfer
the trade-in vehicle with its engine
permanently disabled, as detailed
below.
In enacting the CARS Act, the
Congress was concerned about fraud.
See Section 1302(a)(4). The agency is
aware of the significant disparity in
value that exists between a vehicle that
is in ‘‘drivable condition,’’ as the tradein vehicle must be under this program,
and a vehicle that is scrapped and
ultimately destroyed, which is the
required disposition for that trade-in
vehicle. A substantial opportunity exists
for fraudulent diversion of the trade-in
vehicle, largely because its stillfunctioning engine makes it attractive to
return the vehicle to the road rather
than relegate it to the scrap yard.16
Moreover, continued use of the trade-in
vehicle completely defeats the
environmental purpose of the CARS
Act, which is to remove these vehicles
from the road permanently.
The CARS Act contains an explicit
Congressional instruction to take
measures to prevent fraud and the
statute’s clear environmental objective
is to ensure that the fuel inefficient parts
of the vehicle are never again used on
the highway. Taking the above
considerations into account, including
the Secretary’s authority to prescribe the
manner in which the trade-in vehicle,
including its engine block, is transferred
to a disposal facility, the agency has
determined that the prudent course of
action, consistent with Congressional
concerns about crushing or shredding,
resale and fraud, is to require permanent
disablement of the trade-in vehicle’s
engine block as a part of the qualifying
transaction under this program.
In this context, we note that the
statutory term engine block is not
defined and that Congress did not speak
directly to its meaning. In general, the
term engine block may refer to the block
casting, or to a short block or long block.
The short and long blocks contain the
block casting and, among others, a crank
shaft, connecting rods, bearings and
pistons. Long blocks also include the
cylinder head(s) and the cam(s). In a
pushrod engine, the short block
contains the cam. We interpret ‘‘engine
block’’ to mean the part of the engine
containing the cylinders and typically
incorporating water cooling jackets and
agency to fill the statutory gap or make an
interpretation in a reasonable fashion.
16 We understand that this very kind of continued
use of the vehicle as an automobile has occurred in
at least Germany’s program despite certifications
that the vehicle had been disposed of.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
also including the crank, rods, pistons,
bearings, cam(s) and cylinder heads. In
the case of a rotary engine, the block
includes the rotor housing and rotor. In
light of the statute’s purpose of
removing fuel inefficient vehicles from
the nation’s highways, which of course
are powered by engines that consume
substantial amounts of fuel the agency
believes it is reasonable to read the
word ‘‘engine block’’ in a way that
includes engine parts traditionally
considered part of the ‘‘long block.’’ We
do not believe that parts from the engine
such as the pistons and cylinder head
that could be removed and used to
reconstruct the engine from the trade invehicle should remain available to
recreate the fuel consuming engine.
Finally, the engine disabling procedure
using sodium silicate can not be
performed if the engine parts such as
the head(s) are removed.
The agency has determined that a
quick, inexpensive, and
environmentally safe process exists to
disable the engine of the trade-in
vehicle while in the dealer’s possession.
Removing the engine oil from the
crankcase, replacing it with a 40 percent
solution of sodium silicate (a substance
used in similar concentrations in many
common vehicle applications, including
patching mufflers and radiators), and
running the engine for a short period of
time at low speeds renders the engine
inoperable. Generally, this will require
just two quarts of the sodium silicate
solution. The retail price for two quarts
of this solution (enough to disable the
largest engine under the program) is
under $7, and the time involved should
not substantially exceed that of a typical
oil change. The agency has tested this
method at its Vehicle Research and Test
Center and found it safe, quick, and
effective. As with many materials used
in the vehicle service area of a
dealership, certain common precautions
need to be taken when using sodium
silicate. The same is true with regard to
workers who may come in contact with
the substance during the crushing or
shredding of the engine block. We have
discussed the matter with the EPA and
the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) and are aware
of no detrimental effects related to the
disposal of the engine block with this
material in it.
The agency considered several
possible methods of rendering the
engine inoperable. The agency was
looking for a method that was safe for
workers involved, completely effective,
environmentally sound, and relatively
inexpensive for a dealer to use.
NHTSA’s Vehicle Research and Test
Center (VRTC) tested various methods
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37887
and prepared a report (placed in the
docket) summarizing the tests. VRTC
evaluated four options: (1) The use of
sodium silicate solution in the manner
the agency has now adopted; (2)
destroying the oil filter sealing land and
threaded fastener boss; (3) drilling a
hole in the engine block; and (4)
running the engine without oil. VRTC
concluded that the sodium silicate
method was the best option. The other
methods all had significant problems
related to their effectiveness, practical
limitations based on vehicle variations,
and/or safety risks for workers involved.
Sodium Silicate solution is a mixture
of water and sodium silicate solids.
When, after draining the oil, it is
introduced into the engine oil system,
the oil pump is able to distribute the
solution throughout the engine oiling
system. The heat of the operating engine
then dehydrates the solution leaving
solid sodium silicate distributed
throughout the engine’s oiled surfaces
and moving parts. These solids quickly
abrade the bearings causing the engine
to seize while damaging the moving
parts of the engine and coating all of the
oil passages. Only a small amount of
sodium silicate remains in solution after
completion of the process. Many of the
engine parts will be unaffected by this
process such as: intake and exhaust
manifolds, bolt-on components, and fuel
system components.
The agency reviewed available
information about sodium silicate and
its properties, including a toxicology
report and material safety data sheets
that are available in the docket. Sodium
silicate is a commonly used substance
found in a wide range of products,
including even dishwasher detergent.
The Food and Drug Administration lists
it as a GRAS (Generally Regarded as
Safe) substance. It is used to treat
hazardous wastes, and is frequently
used in the automotive industry as a
rust inhibitor in cooling systems, and to
seal leaks in cooling systems, head
gaskets, and exhaust systems. Neither
our review of available information nor
our discussions with other agencies
(EPA and OSHA) gave the agency reason
to be concerned about the use of sodium
silicate as a significant health or
environmental issue.
It is important to note that there are
many varieties of sodium silicates,
which are differentiated by weight ratio
(the ratio of the silicon dioxide and
sodium oxide that make up the
compound). The weight ratios range
from 1.0 to 3.5, with the higher ratio
formulations being less irritating for
humans and less corrosive in an engine
environment. The material that dealers
will be required to use under this rule
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37888
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
is at the higher end of the range—3.2—
which means that it is far less of a
potential health or environmental issue
than other lower range formulations of
the product.
Like many household and workplace
products, sodium silicate solution can
be harmful if swallowed or inhaled and
can cause irritation to the eyes or
respiratory tract if used improperly.
Employers whose employees may come
in contact with the material need to
provide them with adequate warning of
these risks and appropriate protection.
Because sodium silicate has been used
in automotive repair for decades, it has
long been present both in repair shops
and in vehicles at various stages of
recycling. It is reasonable to assume,
therefore, that dealerships, scrap yards,
and shredder facilities are well
equipped to take appropriate measures
to protect their workers.
Nor did we find reason to have
significant concerns about the
environmental effects of sodium silicate
in this application. The EPA does not
regulate it as a hazardous substance.
Given the high weight ratio of the
formulation that will be used to disable
the engines, the risk of its causing
corrosion is very low. In a report
prepared for the agency, a toxicology
expert reviewed the process required by
this rule concluded: ‘‘Provided adequate
safety equipment is used by personnel
in dealerships and shredder operations,
and dust control measures are employed
at shredder operations to minimize
airborne particulates, the use of sodium
silicate solutions to disable automobile
engines is not expected to adversely
affect occupationally exposed workers,
nor are sodium silicate particulates
expected to harm the environment.’’ 17
The agency has decided to implement
this process in the rule, requiring a
dealer that receives an eligible trade-in
vehicle under the CARS program to
disable that vehicle’s engine prior to
transferring the vehicle to a disposal
facility, and to provide a certification to
the agency that it has done so at the time
the dealer submits its request for
reimbursement. Section 599.300(d)(2)
specifies the requirement for the dealer
to disable the engine, Appendix B sets
forth, in a simple and precise manner,
the procedures that the dealer must
follow to disable the engine and the
workplace precautions that should be
taken, and Appendix A, certifications
section, contains the required dealer
certification.
The rule contains one exception to the
general requirement that the dealer
17 Expert Report of Margaret H. Whittaker, Ph.D.,
M.P.H., D.A.B.T., July 23, 2009.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:06 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
disable the engine prior to transferring
the vehicle to the disposal facility. With
regard to transactions that occurred
prior to the effective date of this rule,
the dealer may have already transferred
the vehicle to a disposal facility,
whether or not using a salvage auction
to transfer the vehicle. In that case, the
rule permits the dealer to locate the
vehicle at the disposal facility and
either disable the engine at that location
or, if the vehicle, including the engine
block and drive train (unless the
transmission, drive shaft, and rear end
are sold separately), has already been
crushed or shredded, to obtain proof, in
the form of the affidavit, from the
disposal facility that the crushing or
shredding has occurred. Section
599.300(e) implements this exception.
The agency is making this allowance
only to accommodate dealers who,
rather than waiting for the final rule to
be issued as the agency had advised,
proceeded to conduct transactions that
were otherwise completely in
accordance with this final rule. Dealers
should note that all other requirements
of this rule, except for the disposal
facility certifications, apply to these
transactions.
Although there was not time to
provide notice and an opportunity to
comment prior to issuance of this final
rule, NHTSA did engage in extensive
outreach prior to its issuance with
representatives of those entities most
knowledgeable about the subject matter.
In those discussions, the method
NHTSA has now chosen for disabling
the engine block was identified as an
option NHTSA might adopt. Several of
the organizations that participated in
the discussions wrote to NHTSA
concerning that methodology. (These
letters are in the docket.)
In its letter of July 21, 2009, NADA
contends that Congress did not assign
the task of making the engine inoperable
to the dealers, and that if required to
accomplish this task the dealers should
be compensated. As discussed above,
the agency interprets the CARS Act as
giving NHTSA substantial discretion in
determining the manner in which the
vehicle, including the engine block, is to
be transferred for ultimate disposal. We
believe that having the engine
permanently disabled at the dealer
greatly reduces the risk of fraud and
helps ensure that the statute’s
environmental objectives will be
achieved. We believe that the dealers
can disable the engine using the
prescribed method at very low cost,
which we estimate to be no greater than
$30. It is possible that the total of the
cost of performing this task and the
dealer’s other costs related to the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
program may exceed the $50 the dealer
is allowed to retain from the trade-in’s
scrappage value to cover its
administrative costs. Nevertheless, we
think the importance of having this task
performed by the dealer is sufficient
reason to require dealers to perform it.
The CARS Act does not preclude
NHTSA from imposing costs necessary
to the proper implementation of the
program.
The Automotive Recyclers
Association (ARA), which represents
more than 4,500 scrap and junk yards,
wrote to NHTSA on July 20. ARA argues
that the use of sodium silicate will
damage more than the engine block and
jeopardize the resale of parts such as
pistons, cams, and cylinder heads. ARA
apparently believes that ‘‘block’’ has
only one meaning, i.e., the so-called
‘‘short block,’’ which generally refers
only to the cast iron or aluminum
casting. As discussed above, NHTSA
has defined ‘‘engine block’’ in a way
that includes the engine parts that ARA
contends are not part of the block.
NHTSA’s definition is a reasonable
reading of the term ‘‘block,’’ and is
consistent with a Congressional purpose
to prevent these fuel inefficient engines
from ever being operated again.
Moreover, even if ARA’s more
restrictive reading of ‘‘block’’ were to
prevail, the statute merely permits the
disposal facility to sell parts that are not
part of the block; it does not preclude
NHTSA from requiring measures that
might affect some of those parts. ARA
also contends that use of sodium silicate
would contaminate the recycling of
motor oil. ARA seems not to understand
that, under the procedure set out in this
rule, the dealer would drain the oil and
recycle it as it would normally do.
The Institute of Scrap Recycling
Industries (ISRI) represents, among
others, companies that shred vehicles
that have previously been crushed,
either at their facility or at another
disposal facility that lacks a shredder.
ISRI wrote to NHTSA on July 20. ISRI
contends, based on the judgment of its
own director of environmental
management, that the use of sodium
silicate could pose hazards to workers at
shredders and could cause certain
metals to corrode, which could lead to
excess metal ions in storm water runoff,
which in turn could make storm water
compliance more challenging. ISRI’s
contentions appear to be based on an
incorrect assumption as to the quantity
of sodium silicate that would be in each
CARS trade-in vehicle; the procedure in
most cases will require no more than
two quarts, while ISRI assumes three to
four quarts. ISRI asserts that a
substantial portion of the material will
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
remain unreacted after the procedure,
which is not the case.
As discussed previously, NHTSA has
no reason to believe that the use of
sodium silicate will expose any
workers, including those at shredders,
to unreasonable risks. Those who
manage the shredders will simply need
to require their employees to take the
precautions necessary to protect
themselves from exposure to sodium
silicate. Presumably those who work at
shredders are appropriately trained and
equipped to deal with hazards that may
be related to the materials with which
they are working. More importantly,
sodium silicate has been present in
motor vehicles for decades because of
its common use in the repair of
mufflers, radiators—and engines. We
assume that shredders have taken note
of the presence of the material before
now. The use of dust respirators would
be advisable.
With regard to the potential
environmental risks, ISRI has not made
an effective case, and NHTSA has no
reason to believe that any such risk
exists with regard to sodium silicate.
The heart of ISRI’s argument is that the
unreacted portion of the sodium silicate
could cause corrosion of metals during
the shredding process. As noted above,
the formulation of sodium silicate used
in the engine disablement procedure is
among those least likely to have a severe
corrosive effect. In fact, sodium silicate
is used in vehicle cooling systems to
inhibit corrosion and is used in metal
pipes to help prevent corrosion that
could increase lead levels in drinking
water. In any event, the agency has no
reason to believe that the untoward
environmental effects that ISRI suggests
may occur are a realistic possibility.
The rule also requires that, prior to
submitting a copy of the title along with
its request for reimbursement, the dealer
clearly mark the title on both sides with
the words, ‘‘Junk Automobile,
CARS.gov.’’ Section 599.300(d)(3)
implements this requirement. The
marking must be placed so as not to
obscure the vehicle owner’s name, VIN,
or other writing. Having this special
label or brand on the title will inform all
who subsequently handle it that the
vehicle is a trade-in under this program
and should not be registered or titled for
further use as an automobile. State
registration officials should pay special
attention to this marking on a title
because it indicates that the vehicle has
been traded in under the CARS program
with the understanding that it would
never again be used as an automobile in
this or any other country and is suitable
only to be used for scrap or parts.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
3. Restrictions and Limitations on
Transactions
The CARS Act places some
restrictions and limitations on
qualifying transactions under the
program. Section 1302(c)(1)(A) of the
Act provides that a credit may be issued
only for a qualifying transaction that
occurs between July 1, 2009 and
November 1, 2009. Additionally,
section1302(c)(1)(B) provides that not
more than 1 credit may be issued for a
single person and not more than 1 credit
may be issued for the joint registered
owners of a single eligible trade-in
vehicle, and § 1302(c)(1)(C) provides
that only 1 credit issued under the
Program may be applied toward the
purchase or qualifying lease of a single
new vehicle. Reading these
requirements together, the agency has
determined that only one credit may be
issued for each transaction under the
program and that once a person
participates in a transaction, whether as
an individual owner or a joint-registered
owner of either an eligible trade-in
vehicle, a new vehicle, or both, the
person may not receive another credit or
be named in a transaction receiving a
credit under the program. These time
and transaction limitations are specified
in sections 599.301(a), (b), and (c).
One additional restriction, although
not specifically stated in the CARS Act,
flows naturally from its operation. The
agency has concluded that in order to be
entitled to reimbursement under the
program, a dealer must obtain clear title
to the trade-in vehicle. Without clear
title, the dealer is not in a position to
make the statutorily required legal
certification as to disposal of the tradein vehicle that serves as a prerequisite
to reimbursement. Similarly, disposal
facilities would generally be unable to
crush or shred the trade-in vehicle, as
required under the Act. The agency is
informed that in many new car
purchases involving trade-in vehicles,
the title to the trade-in vehicle is not
immediately available, either because it
is held by a lienholder or for some other
reason. Nevertheless, the dealer
proceeds with the transaction, even
though title is obtained and transferred
to the dealer at a later time. In some
small percentage of such transactions,
the dealer is unable to obtain clear title
to the trade-in vehicle. Were that to
occur under this program, the dealer
would not be able to ensure that the
trade-in vehicle would be disposed of in
accordance with the Act. If NHTSA had
already reimbursed the dealer for the
credit amount, NHTSA would have
provided the credit under circumstances
beyond its authority under the statute
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37889
and would have to recover the funds.
NHTSA does not believe it has a duty
to fund any such tentative deal and will
not do so. Such a transaction does not
qualify for reimbursement under the
program until the dealer obtains the title
(assuming that other eligibility criteria
are met). Consequently, the dealer may
not submit an application for
reimbursement (discussed later in this
document) until title to the trade-in
vehicle, free of all liens and
encumbrances, is transferred to it. If the
title to the trade-in vehicle has been
lost, the owner will need to acquire
duplicate title from the State. Section
599.301(d) implements this requirement
for transfer of the trade-in title.
The agency recognizes that five
States—Georgia, Maine, New
Hampshire, Rhode Island and
Vermont—do not issue titles in
transactions involving some older
vehicles that may be eligible for tradein under this program. In some of these
States, liens may be documented on the
registrations. In these States and for
these vehicles, a current registration in
the name of the person intending to
purchase the new vehicle, with no
evidence of lien, and a bill of sale
conferring ownership of the trade-in
vehicle from the purchaser of the new
vehicle to the dealer, serves in lieu of
the title. Section 599.301(e) of the rule
allows use of a current registration and
bill of sale in lieu of a title in these
limited situations.
f. Requirements for Dealer
Reimbursement (§§ 599.302–304)
As a precondition for reimbursing a
dealer for a qualifying transaction under
the Program, NHTSA must have a
means of verifying that all the statutory
conditions have been met. The rule
requires a dealer to submit an
application for reimbursement to
NHTSA, containing the information and
certifications necessary for NHTSA to
do so. The dealer must use its user
account and password (discussed
earlier) to access a secure Web site and
submit an application. The application
consists of an electronic transaction
form (portion reproduced in Appendix
C) that requires inputting of information
into relevant fields, attaching electronic
copies of supporting documents, and
making applicable certifications.
The electronic form requires the
dealer to input and attach several pieces
of information about the vehicle
purchaser, trade-in vehicle, and new
vehicle. For a purchaser, a dealer must
collect individual or entity name,
address and State or corporate
identification number (e.g., driver’s
license number, State identification
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37890
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
number, corporate tax identification
number). This information is used to
verify the identity of the purchaser and
to confirm no prior participation in the
program. For the trade-in vehicle and
new vehicle, the dealer must input
characteristics of the vehicle (e.g., make,
model, model year, combined fuel
economy, odometer reading, VIN, base
MSRP, engine and transmission
description), and input and attach
evidence of vehicle insurance,
registration and title. This information
is used to determine that each of these
vehicles is eligible under the Program
and that the transaction meets the
requirements for fuel economy
improvement.
The dealer must also attach additional
information to verify the transaction,
including a copy of the purchase
contract or lease agreement, the
Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin or
Manufacturer’s Statement of Origin, and
certifications from the salvage auction
or disposal facility. The dealer must also
complete and attach a Summary of Sale/
Lease and Certifications Form
(Appendix A, certifications section).
This form conveys that the dealer has
extended a CARS credit, as well as any
other rebate and manufacturer
incentive, and has disclosed the
scrappage value of the trade-in vehicle
to the purchaser. The form also sets
forth required dealer and purchaser
certifications. The dealer and purchaser
must sign this form, attesting that each
has followed the requirements of the
CARS Act and its implementing
regulations. In addition to the
certifications on this form, the dealer
must also make required certifications
listed on the electronic transaction form.
Finally, the agency requests that the
dealer attach a completed customer
survey (Appendix D). This survey
should be presented to the customer for
completion prior to the submission of
an application for reimbursement. The
information in the survey is important
for the agency to meet its Congressional
reporting requirement. The
requirements associated with dealer
applications are implemented in section
599.302.
Upon receipt of the application, the
agency will review the application to
determine whether it is complete and
satisfies all the requirements of a
qualifying transaction. An application
that meets the requirements of the CARS
Program will be approved for payment
and the agency will reimburse the
dealer, by electronic transfer to the
account identified under the registration
process in section 599.200.
If an application is incomplete or
otherwise fails to meet all the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
requirements of for a qualifying
transaction, the application will be
rejected and the submitter will be
informed electronically of the reason for
rejection. A dealer may correct and
resubmit a rejected application for
reimbursement without penalty, but the
application will be treated as a new
application as of the date it is
resubmitted. The requirements
concerning application review and
payment of dealers are implemented in
sections 599.303 and 304.
g. Disposal of Trade-In Vehicles
(§§ 599.400–403)
In addressing the trade-in vehicle
disposal process (Section III.b.,
Identification of Disposal Facilities), the
agency decided to include disposal
facilities participating in the ELVS
program (currently numbering
approximately 7,700) 18 on the list of
facilities that may participate in the
disposal process, subject to certain
conditions and certifications. As a
condition of accepting transfer of the
trade-in vehicle, the disposal facility
must certify that it meets all applicable
State and Federal laws and has a
currently active State license to operate
as a disposal facility in that State. The
disposal facility must also certify that it
will not sell, lease, exchange, or
otherwise dispose of the vehicle for use
as an automobile in the United States or
any other country, that the vehicle will
be crushed or shredded onsite within
six months after the date of its transfer
from the dealer, and that the vehicle
will not be transferred to another
disposal facility prior to being crushed
or shredded. Finally, it must certify that
it will update NMVTIS, within 7 days
after receiving the trade-in vehicle and
again within 7 days after crushing or
shredding the vehicle. During the sixmonth period prior to the required
crushing or shredding of the trade-in
vehicle, the disposal facility may sell
any parts of the vehicle other than the
engine block 19 or drive train (unless the
drive train is dismantled and sold in
parts). These requirements for disposal
facilities are implemented in sections
599.400(b) and 401 and Appendix E.
The agency also has determined that,
in lieu of direct transfer to a disposal
facility that appears on the agency’s list,
the dealer may opt to transfer the tradein vehicle to a salvage auction, subject
18 The agency also decided to include certain
disposal facilities in the State of Maine, as
explained earlier in this document. The list does
not include disposal facilities for the territories.
However, disposal facilities in the territories must
make the certification discussed in this paragraph.
19 Section 599.102 contains a definition of the
term ‘‘engine block.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to certain conditions and certifications.
As a condition of accepting transfer of
the trade-in vehicle, the salvage auction
must certify that it meets all applicable
State and Federal laws and has a
currently active State license to conduct
business as a salvage auction in that
State. The salvage auction must also
certify that it will not sell, lease,
exchange, or otherwise dispose of the
vehicle for use as an automobile in the
United States or any other country. It
must certify that it will limit
participation in the auction of a tradein vehicle under the CARS program to
a disposal facility that currently appears
on the agency’s CARS list of disposal
facilities and will obtain from the
disposal facility the same certification
the disposal facility would have
provided upon direct transfer of a tradein vehicle from the dealer, and provide
that certification to NHTSA. Finally, the
salvage auction must certify that it will
update NMVTIS, within 3 days after
receipt of the trade-in vehicle from the
dealer, or prior to auction, whichever is
earlier. These requirements for salvage
auctions are implemented in sections
599.400(c) and 402 and Appendix F.
Finally, a dealer receiving certifications
from a disposal facility or a salvage
auction under these procedures is
required to send them to the agency
within 7 days of receipt. Section
599.403 sets forth this requirement.
It is important to note that the
requirement under the CARS Act and its
implementing regulations for disposal
facilities and salvage auctions
participating in the CARS program to
update NMVTIS are distinct from the
monthly reporting requirement imposed
on junk and salvage yards pursuant to
49 U.S.C. 30504. In accordance with
regulations implemented by the
Department of Justice at 28 CFR 25.56,
any individual or entity engaged in the
business of operating a junk yard or
salvage yard within the United States
shall provide, or cause to be provided
on its behalf, to the operator of NMVTIS
and in a format acceptable to the
operator, an inventory of all junk
automobiles or salvage automobiles
obtained in whole or in part by that
entity in the prior month. Updates by
junk and salvage yards to NMVTIS
under the CARS Act and its
implementing regulations, however,
may fulfill this separate NMVTIS
monthly reporting requirement
regarding such vehicles, provided the
updates contain all of the information
required by the Department of Justice
under 28 CFR Part 25.
The procedures described above allow
a trade-in vehicle to be transferred no
more than two times subsequent to the
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
dealer taking title and prior to its
crushing or shredding, either directly to
an entity currently appearing on the list
of eligible disposal facilities, where the
vehicle must remain until it is crushed
or shredded, or to a salvage auction that
subsequently transfers the vehicle to
that entity. This approach for the
vehicle disposal process is adopted in
Subpart D and the required
certifications appear in Appendices E
and F. Nothing in the rule proscribes
further transfer of a crushed vehicle to
another disposal facility, including a
shredder.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
h. Enforcement (§§ 599.500–517)
1. Prevention of Fraud
The funds Congress provided for the
CARS program are intended only for
qualifying transactions, and the
requirement to destroy the trade-in
vehicle is an important part of the
program. To protect the taxpaying
public, NHTSA will enforce the Act and
this implementing regulation strictly
and will work with the DOT Inspector
General, the Department of Justice, and
other government agencies to punish
violations and fraud.
In the rule being issued today,
NHTSA has taken a number of steps to
minimize the potential for fraud in the
first instance. Among other things,
NHTSA has created a system that will
provide payments only for qualifying
transactions under the CARS program.
NHTSA will make electronic funds
transfers only to a registered dealer that
has submitted the required proof and
made the required certifications under
penalty of law. The rule establishes a
registration system to identify licensed,
franchised new vehicle dealers and to
obtain the information necessary for
making secure electronic transfers. Only
registered dealers will have access to the
payment system.
At the time of the transaction at the
dealer, a purchaser who is trading in a
vehicle will need to provide evidence of
ownership and proof that the vehicle
has been continuously registered to that
owner and insured throughout the last
12 months. To prevent repeated use of
the program by the same person, the
consumer will need to provide evidence
of identity and permit that information
to become part of the documentation of
the transaction.
We believe that dealers will have
every reason to avoid entering into a
transaction for which the dealer cannot
be reimbursed under this program.
Dealers will be expected to verify that
the trade-in vehicle and the vehicle
being purchased or leased are both
eligible under the program. For both
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
vehicles, the dealer will need to verify
the combined fuel economy. With
regard to the trade-in vehicle, the dealer
will need to verify that the registration
and insurance information is accurate
and that the vehicle is in drivable
condition.
Also, this rule provides measures to
ensure that the trade-in vehicle is never
used again as an automobile in this or
any other country. These measures
include requiring the dealer to disable
the trade-in vehicle’s engine prior to
transferring the vehicle, requiring
binding certifications from all entities
involved in handling these vehicles,
updating the NMVTIS system at all
crucial junctures to ensure the
availability of information about the
vehicle’s status, and labeling the title of
those vehicles as ‘‘junk automobiles’’ to
defer further sale of them as vehicles
authorized for on-road use.
The process set out in this rule
includes obtaining certifications from
purchasers, dealers, salvage auctions,
and disposal facilities involved with
CARS transactions. Those certifications
will be made on paper or electronic
forms that make clear that there are
significant penalties for submitting false
information. NHTSA, working with
DOT’s Office of Inspector General and
the Department of Justice, will
vigorously pursue actions against
anyone it believes has submitted false
information in connection with this
program.
The agency will conduct inspections
of records, premises and vehicles to
detect possible violations. Should
NHTSA identify a violation or fraud, we
intend to enforce the CARS Act’s
requirements vigorously. The public is
encouraged to contact NHTSA if it
suspects any fraud is occurring in
connection with the CARS program.
Please call 1–866–CAR–7891, which is
NHTSA’s dedicated hotline for calls
about the program, Monday–Friday 8
a.m. to 10 p.m., TTY: 1–800–424–9153.
Anyone who thinks illegal activity
related to this program has occurred
may also call the Hotline of the Office
of the Inspector General (OIG) at the
U.S. Department of Transportation. The
toll free number is 1–800–424–9071.
The OIG Hotline is an important tool for
reporting allegations of fraud, waste,
abuse, or mismanagement in the
Department’s programs or operations,
including the CARS program. The
Hotline is set-up to receive allegations
in a variety of forms, including by email (hotline@oig.dot.gov), regular mail
(DOT Inspector General, P.O. Box 708,
Fredericksburg, VA 22404), fax (540–
373–2090), and the toll free number
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37891
identified above. The OIG Hotline is
open 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Those who think the Internet has been
used to commit a crime related to this
program may also contact the Internet
Crime Complaint Center (IC3), a
partnership among the Federal Bureau
of Investigation https://www.fbi.gov
(FBI), the National White Collar Crime
Center https://www.nw3c.org/ (NW3C),
and the Bureau of Justice Assistance
https://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA/ (BJA).
IC3’s mission is to serve as a vehicle to
receive, develop, and refer criminal
complaints regarding the rapidly
expanding arena of cyber crime. The IC3
gives the victims of cyber crime a
convenient and easy-to-use reporting
mechanism that alerts authorities of
suspected criminal or civil violations.
2. Civil Penalties and Other Sanctions
While NHTSA expects that the vast
majority of activities under the CARS
Act will comply with it and the
implementing regulations, NHTSA
intends to penalize violators. Section
1302(d)(6) of the CARS Act requires
NHTSA’s regulations implementing the
program to provide for the enforcement
of the penalties described in Section
1302(e). Section 1302(e)(1) provides that
it shall be unlawful for any person to
violate any provision under this section
(i.e., under the CARS Act) or any
regulations issued pursuant to the CARS
Act.
Section 1302(e)(2) provides that any
person who commits a violation
described in Section 1302(e)(1) shall be
liable to the United States Government
for a civil penalty of not more than
$15,000 for each violation, and that the
Secretary shall have the authority to
assess and compromise such penalties
and to require from any entity the
records and inspections necessary to
enforce this program. In determining the
amount of the civil penalty, the severity
of the violation and the intent and
history of the person committing the
violation shall be taken into account.
As authorized by Section 1302(e)(2) of
the CARS Act, which grants NHTSA the
authority to require from any entity the
records and inspections necessary to
enforce this program, NHTSA will use
information gathering mechanisms
comparable to those it currently
employs under other statutes the agency
administers.
In the rule being issued today,
NHTSA has established administrative
procedures to assess civil penalties
quickly and fairly once a likely violation
is identified. These procedures are set
forth at subpart E. Under these
procedures, any person may report an
apparent violation to NHTSA. When a
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37892
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
report of an apparent violation is
received, or when an apparent violation
has been detected by any person
working for NHTSA, the matter may be
investigated or evaluated by NHTSA
enforcement personnel. If NHTSA
enforcement personnel believe that a
violation may have occurred, a report of
the investigation will be prepared and
sent to the NHTSA Chief Counsel for
review. The Chief Counsel will review
the report to determine if there is
sufficient information to establish a
likely violation. If the Chief Counsel
determines that a violation has likely
occurred, the Chief Counsel may issue
a Notice of Violation to the party, or
make other enforcement
recommendations, such as suspensions
or revocations. The alleged violator will
have an opportunity to present its views
to NHTSA and reach a settlement of the
civil penalty case. If the alleged violator
instead requests a hearing, the Chief
Counsel will forward a case file to a
Hearing Officer, with a recommended
action. The Hearing Officer’s functions
are separate from those of NHTSA’s
enforcement personnel and Chief
Counsel, and the Hearing Officer has no
other responsibility, direct or
supervisory, for the investigation of
cases referred for the assessment of civil
penalties.
A party receiving the Notice of
Violation may pay the proposed penalty
or decline the Notice of Violation. If the
Notice of Violation is timely declined,
the regulations provide for a hearing
prior to a final assessment of a penalty
by the Hearing Officer. Failure to either
pay the proposed penalty on the Notice
of Violation or request a hearing within
30 days of the date shown on the Notice
of Violation will result in a finding of
default, and NHTSA will assess the civil
penalty in the amount proposed on the
Notice of Violation without a hearing.
The hearings will be held at the
headquarters of the U.S. Department of
Transportation in Washington, DC,
either telephonically or in person,
before a Hearing Officer. Unlike another
statute administered by NHTSA, the
CARS Act does not require a hearing on
the record before assessing civil
penalties. For example, Section
508(a)(1) of the Motor Vehicle
Information and Cost Savings Act
(formerly 15 U.S.C. 2008 (1994), and
now codified at 49 U.S.C. 32911),
provided that if fuel economy
calculations indicate that any
manufacturer has violated specified
provisions, the Secretary shall
commence a proceeding. Section
508(a)(2) of the Cost Savings Act then
went on to state that, if on the record
after opportunity for agency hearing, the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Secretary determines that such
manufacturer has violated provisions,
the Secretary shall assess the penalties
provided for under subsection (b). This
provision was recodified at 49 U.S.C.
32911(b) and 32912 so as to clearly
provide for ‘‘an opportunity for a
hearing on the record’’ to decide
whether a violation has been
committed. In view of the language in
the Cost Savings Act, NHTSA adopted
regulations establishing formal
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
adjudicative hearing procedures before
an administrative law judge (ALJ),
which may result in civil penalties. See
49 CFR Part 511, Adjudicative
Procedures. In view of the absence of
any statutory requirement in the CARS
Act for an on-the-record hearing or, in
fact, for any hearing, as set forth in the
regulatory text, the formal APA
adjudication procedures set forth at 5
U.S.C. 554, 556 and 557 do not apply to
civil penalty proceedings under the
CARS Act and NHTSA need not employ
an ALJ as the hearing officer. There is
no right to discovery. In receiving
evidence, the Hearing Officer is not
bound by strict rules of evidence. At the
conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing
Officer assesses civil penalties, if
appropriate. If civil penalties are in
excess of $100,000.00, the Hearing
Officer’s decision may be appealed to
the NHTSA Administrator.
NHTSA also has the authority under
the CARS Act to compromise (i.e.,
settle) civil penalties, and parties
receiving notices of violations will be
given the opportunity early in the
process to settle with the Government,
should they choose to do so. Finally, we
note that these penalties are not
exclusive. For example, violators could
also face penalties under the False
Claims Act or criminal prosecution.
V. Confidential Information and
Privacy
Administration of the CARS program
requires that information about
qualifying transactions be submitted to
NHTSA from different entities and
individuals. Some of this data is
sensitive. As discussed below, NHTSA
is amending its existing regulations
governing confidential treatment, found
at 49 CFR Part 512, to address these
issues.
a. Determinations of the Confidentiality
of CARS Data Based on FOIA
Exemptions 4 and 6
The confidentiality of most CARS
data is based on Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) Exemptions 4 and 6, 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(4) and (b)(6). FOIA
Exemption 4 allows withholding of
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a
person and privileged or confidential.
Under Exemption 4, the standard for
assessing the confidentiality of
information that parties are required to
submit to the government is whether
disclosure of the information is likely to
have either of the following effects: (1)
To impair the Government’s ability to
obtain necessary information in the
future; or (2) to cause substantial
competitive harm to the competitive
position of the person from whom the
information was obtained.20 National
Parks & Conservation Ass’n v. Morton,
498 F.2d 765, 770 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
Because of the nature of the information
at issue here, our discussion is limited
to examination of the competitive harm
test even though other standards could
justify non-disclosure.21
Under the competitive harm test of
National Parks, there must be actual
competition and a likelihood of
substantial competitive injury from
disclosure of the information. CNA
Financial Corp. v. Donovan, 830 F.2d
1132, 1152 (D.C. Cir. 1987). This
standard requires only that disclosure of
information would ‘‘likely’’ cause
competitive harm. McDonnell Douglas
Corp. v. U.S. Dept. of the Air Force, 375
F.3d 1182, 1187 (D.C. Cir. 2004); see
also Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. SEC,
873 F.2d 325, 341 (D.C. Cir. 1989).
Under this test, the agency assesses the
likelihood of substantial injury; it does
not make that assessment and then
further balance it against other matters
such as the public’s interest in the
information. Public Citizen Health
Research Group v. FDA, 185 F.3d 898,
904–05 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
Exemption 6 of the FOIA addresses
the withholding of ‘‘personnel and
20 The term ‘‘trade secrets’’ has been narrowly
defined by the Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit for the purpose of FOIA
Exemption 4 as encompassing a secret,
commercially valuable plan, formula, process, or
device that is used for the making, preparing,
compounding, or processing of trade commodities
and that can be said to be the end product of either
innovation or substantial effort. Public Citizen
Health Research Group v. FDA, 704 F.2d 1280, 1288
(D.C. Cir. 1983).
21 Impairment to the Government’s ability to
obtain the information in the future serves as an
independent basis for withholding under
Exemption 4. See National Parks, 498 F.2d at 770.
Case law also strongly points to the availability of
a ‘‘third prong’’ protecting other governmental
interests, such as compliance and program
effectiveness. See Critical Mass v. NRC, 975 F.2d
871, 879 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (noting that Exemption 4
can protect interests beyond impairment and
competitive harm. See also 9 to 5 Org. for Women
Office Workers v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Res.
System, 721 F.2d 1, 11 (1st Cir. 1983) (adopting a
third prong under Exemption 4 based on the
government’s interest in administrative efficiency
and effectiveness).
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
medical files and similar files the
disclosure of which would constitute a
clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy’’ to the subject of those
files. See 5 U.S.C. 52(b)(6). The first
inquiry in examining withholding
information under Exemption 6 is a
determination of what data is at stake
and the nature and degree of any
privacy interest in the information. The
second step is an assessment of the
public interest in disclosure. Under
Exemption 6, the concept of public
interest is limited to shedding light on
the government’s performance of its
statutory duties. U.S. Dep’t of Justice v.
Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the
Press, 489 U.S. 749, 773 (1989);
National Ass’n of Retired Federal
Employees v. Horner, 879 F.2d 873, 879
(D.C. Cir. 1989); cf., DOD v. FLRA, 510
U.S. 487, 497 (1994). Finally, there is a
weighing of the privacy interests at
stake against the public interest in
disclosure. Ripkis v. Dept. Hous. and
Urban Dev., 746 F.2d 1, 3 (D.C. Cir.
1984).
Data submitted under the CARS
program includes personally identifying
information for consumers. This
information falls within the
classification of ‘‘similar files’’ under
Exemption 6. In Center for Auto Safety
v. National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 809 F. Supp. 148
(D.D.C. 1993), an advocacy group sought
the release of names and addresses of
consumers filing complaints directly to
NHTSA. The Court found that the
complainant’s names and addresses
invoked a privacy interest within the
scope of Exemption 6 and ruled in favor
of non-disclosure because there was no
ascertainable public interest of
sufficient significance or certainty to
outweigh a complainant’s privacy right
justifying release of the information.
b. Approach—Class Determinations vs.
Individual Assessments
As employed in the agency’s
regulations governing confidentiality
determinations (49 CFR Part 512), class
determinations declare that certain
categories of data submitted to NHTSA
will be kept confidential. Under this
approach, submitters need not request
confidential treatment; such treatment is
given automatically.
NHTSA is promulgating class
determinations on the confidentiality of
some categories of CARS data. In
adopting this approach, we have
considered a number of matters. First,
NHTSA may adopt categorical rules to
manage the tasks Congress assigned to it
under the CARS Act. Public Citizen v.
Mineta, 427 F. Supp. 2d 7, 13 (D. D.C.
2006). Second, we have identified and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
assessed the alternatives. One
alternative is to require entities to
submit individual requests for
confidentiality for each transaction. A
second alternative is presumptive
categorical determinations of
confidentiality. A third alternative is to
adopt binding class determinations.
Concerns involved in considering these
alternatives include providing clear
direction to CARS participants,
predictability, consistency and
efficiency.
Requiring individual requests for
confidential treatment of CARS data
would force thousands of entities,
almost all of them small businesses, to
submit requests for confidentiality for
each transaction. These entities, having
virtually no experience in making such
requests, would likely submit a wide
variety of documents written in
different ways. Some requests would
meet the applicable standards for
confidential treatment and some would
not. Given our past experience with
first-time requests, many would not
meet procedural requirements, would be
denied and would then be followed by
reconsideration requests. The burden
imposed on entities requesting
confidential treatment and on the
agency would be substantial. NHTSA
already receives about 550 requests for
confidential treatment every year.
Adding the expected number of CARS
submissions to the existing
confidentiality request workload would
overwhelm the agency and lead to a
huge backlog. Consistent with our
practice, information would be withheld
until NHTSA decides if it is
confidential. Disclosure of rightfully
public information would be delayed
and the public interest would be
impacted, particularly if other agency
resources were diverted to address the
backlog. In view of the foregoing,
requiring and processing individual
requests for confidential treatment for
CARS data is not a viable alternative.
A second alternative is presumptive
class determinations. Presumptive
determinations are a middle ground
between ad hoc determinations and
binding class determinations. Unlike the
latter, that operate automatically,
presumptive determinations require
submitters to provide abbreviated
written requests and supporting
justifications. In our view, presumptive
confidentiality determinations are
inappropriate for CARS. While
presumptive determinations would
provide direction to NHTSA’s clients
and avoid inconsistent confidentiality
determinations, they would not
eliminate individual confidentiality
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37893
requests and the significant burdens
those requests would impose.
A third alternative is to proceed by
binding rule. Binding determinations for
CARS data are appropriate mechanisms
to address the confidentiality of
sensitive data. CARS reports are
submitted by filling out standardized
electronic templates that are used
repeatedly. Each manufacturer, dealer
and salvage yard files the same reports
as other CARS participants in the same
category.
Binding determinations provide
direction to the regulated community.
They also assure consistency and avoid
resource burdens, particularly for small
businesses. They conserve agency
resources that would otherwise be used
to respond to thousands of individual
confidentiality requests and allow more
rapid disclosure of information that is
not confidential. This is in the public
interest. In view of the foregoing,
NHTSA believes that binding
determinations are appropriate.
c. Class Determinations Based on FOIA
Exemption 4
FOIA Exemption 4 covers commercial
or financial information obtained from a
person that is privileged or confidential.
5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). The terms
‘‘commercial’’ or ‘‘financial’’
information are given their ordinary
meanings. Public Citizen Health
Research Group v. FDA, 704 F.2d 1280,
1290 (D.C. Cir. 1983). Some CARS data
meet this element of Exemption 4.22
Second, the information must be
obtained from a ‘‘person.’’ The word
‘‘person’’ encompasses business
establishments, including corporations.
See FlightSafety Servs. v. Dep’t of Labor,
326 F.3d 607, 611 (5th Cir. 2003). CARS
data from manufacturers, dealers and
salvage auctions and disposal facilities
is obtained from persons within the
meaning of Exemption 4. Third, the
information must be confidential. As
noted above, the National Parks Court
declared that commercial or financial
data is ‘‘confidential’’ for the purposes
of Exemption 4 if disclosure of the
information would be likely to cause
substantial competitive harm to the
competitive position of the person from
whom the information was obtained.
498 F.2d at 770. Actual competitive
harm need not be demonstrated; actual
competition and a likelihood of
substantial competitive injury is all that
need be shown. CNA Financial Corp. v.
22 See the discussion of the categories of CARS
information below. Those discussions demonstrate
that the submitters have a commercial interest in
the data.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37894
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Donovan, 830 F.2d 1132, 1152 (D.C. Cir.
1987).
We now turn to certain categories of
information that manufacturers, dealers
and disposal facilities must submit
under the CARS rule.
d. Data Submitted to NHTSA for the
CARS Program
1. Manufacturer Data
Vehicle manufacturers will provide
NHTSA with both dealer and vehicle
information needed for administration
of the CARS program. The dealer
information is used to identify dealers
and determine if they are authorized
new car dealers for a particular make.
Manufacturers will provide NHTSA
with information about the vehicles
they manufacture.
2. Dealer Information and Transaction
Data
New car dealers participating in the
CARS program must submit information
related to their business as well as data
for individual sales. To take part in the
CARS program, dealers must register
with NHTSA. The required registration
data includes identifying information
and the identity and contact information
for a designated CARS contact person.
Once registered, dealers have to submit
information needed to establish a CARS
account. This includes the registration
data discussed above and additional
data needed for financial transactions.
For each individual sale, dealers also
submit dealer data, new vehicle
purchaser data, trade-in vehicle data,
and new vehicle data.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
3. Disposal Facility Information and
Destruction Data
Disposal Facilities are required to
submit certifications to NHTSA
regarding their business operations and
to verify proper destruction of CARS
trade-in vehicles.
e. CARS Data Class Determinations
Based on FOIA Exemption 4
With a few exceptions, the data
submitted by businesses participating in
the CARS program is already a matter of
public record. Dealer addresses,
telephone numbers, fax numbers and email addresses are freely given. Other
information, such as a dealer or salvage
yard business license number, legal
name and legal address, are available
through public records. Still more data
can be ascertained through publicly
available search engines. For example,
Employer Identification Numbers (EINs)
for businesses are routinely released on
tax forms, public filings and, in some
instances, on employee pay stubs. As a
result, an employer’s EIN may be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
searched and retrieved by name from a
number of Web based providers for a
nominal fee. Nonetheless, some data
provided to NHTSA under the CARS
program is not publicly available and
entitled to confidential treatment. This
data is discussed below.
1. Manufacturer Assigned Dealer
Identification
Vehicle manufacturers assign
identification codes to their individual
dealers. One manufacturer, Ford,
indicates that these codes are
confidential and that release of this
information would be likely to cause
competitive harm by increasing the
possibility of fraud perpetrated by
impostors using dealer codes. Because
fraudulent use of this information
would be likely to cause competitive
harm, this final rule establishes a class
determination extending confidential
treatment to these manufacturer
assigned dealer codes.
2. Dealer Bank Name, ABA Routing
Number, Bank Account Number
Participating dealers will be
identifying their bank, its American
Banking Association (ABA) routing
number and a bank account number in
forms submitted to NHTSA. This
information is kept confidential by these
dealers and its release would cause
substantial harm to those dealers. Public
disclosure of this information presents
an open and obvious potential for fraud
or abuse that could result in serious
financial loss. Indeed, even the
inadvertent disclosure of a bank account
number and a subsequent change to
another account can cause significant
disruption in business operations. The
agency believes that a class
determination is an appropriate means
for protecting this information.
3. CARS Dealer ID and CARS
Authorization Codes
NHTSA will provide participating
dealers with unique identifiers for
CARS purposes and issue CARS
authorization codes for individual
CARS transactions. Dealers must use
this unique identifier and authorization
code when submitting requests for
reimbursement. Public disclosure of a
dealer’s unique CARS ID and
authorization code increases the
potential that this identifier will be used
improperly or to perpetuate fraud.
Unauthorized and improper use of the
unique CARS ID and code would be
likely to cause the ‘‘owner’’ of the ID to
suffer competitive harm. The legitimate
‘‘owner’’ of the ID and authorization
code may be subject to financial claims,
suspension or removal from the CARS
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
program and other costs associated with
improper use of a CARS code and ID.
Accordingly, this final rule establishes a
class determination according
confidential treatment to this data.
f. Class Determination Based on FOIA
Exemption 6
The CARS rule requires dealers to
provide NHTSA with the name, address,
telephone number, state identification
number, trade-in vehicle VIN, trade-in
insurance information and new vehicle
VIN for consumers participating in the
CARS program. NHTSA has long held
the view that Exemption 6 of the FOIA
authorizes confidential treatment of
consumer personally identifying
information. See 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6).
Accordingly, consumer names,
addresses and telephone numbers are
routinely accorded confidential
treatment. The agency’s policy has been
to redact personal identifiers from
owner complaints (whether filed
directly with the agency or from
documents obtained from manufacturers
in the course of a defect investigation)
before placing them on the public
record.
The privacy interest in protecting
personal identifiers and contact
information is no less compelling when
a consumer purchases a new vehicle
under the CARS program. Furthermore,
disclosure of personal identifiers and
the erosion of privacy that would result
might dissuade consumers from
participating in CARS. This would
frustrate achievement of the program’s
principal goal—to encourage
replacement of older less fuel efficient
vehicles with new more fuel-efficient
cars and trucks.
The consumer data at issue—name,
address, telephone number, state
identification number and vehicle
identification number (VIN)—is within
the scope of Exemption 6. VINs, when
coupled with other data, can be used to
identify vehicle owners and obtain other
personal data. As this data has privacy
implications, the next inquiry is an
assessment of the public interest in
disclosure. Congress has directed the
disclosure of trade-in vehicle VINs to
the commercial market to help verify
destruction of these vehicles. For the
remaining personal data, the concept of
public interest under Exemption 6 is
limited to shedding light on the
government’s performance of its
statutory duties. United States
Department of Justice v. Reporters
Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489
U.S. 749, 773 (1989); National Ass’n of
Retired Federal Employees v. Horner,
879 F.2d 873, 879 (D.C. Cir. 1989); cf.,
DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487, 497 (1994).
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
With the limited redaction of part of the
VIN under this rulemaking, the public
would be able to review identification of
the make, model and model year of the
new vehicle. This apprises the public of
information central to the core purpose
of the CARS program. Disclosing
additional VIN information, with the
sequential number unique to the
vehicle, that would enable someone to
identify the owner of the new vehicle
and other personal information would
not, however, further serve the public
interest. If disclosed, it would not
answer the question of ‘‘what the
government is up to.’’ Reporters Comm.,
489 U.S. at 773 (1989).
The final step in an Exemption 6
analysis is weighing the competing
privacy and public interests against one
another. See Ripskis v. HUD, 746 F.2d
1, 3 (D.C. Cir. 1984). In the case of the
CARS VIN information, there is a
privacy interest in not being contacted
about a new vehicle purchase, such as
by companies selling warranties. On the
other hand, the public interest, in terms
of information that reveals ‘‘what the
government is up to’’ is better served by
other publicly available information. On
balance, NHTSA has concluded that the
privacy interests in non-disclosure of
consumer personal identifying
information outweigh the limited public
interest served by disclosing this
information when other data is available
to better address public concerns.
NHTSA is amending 49 CFR Part 512
by revising Appendix E to provide new
class determinations applying to
information provided for the CARS
program. These class determinations do
not apply as a rule of general
application to the agency’s treatment of
similar information in other instances.
Revising Appendix E requires addition
of a new Appendix F to accommodate
information previously found in
Appendix E.
VI. Costs and Benefits
The CARS Act will have various
economic, employment, safety and
environmental effects. The employment
impacts of the Act will affect NHTSA,
and may affect manufacturer and dealer
employment. At this time, NHTSA is
planning to hire 30 employees and over
200 contractor employees to handle this
program over a period of 6 months.
Manufacturers’ and dealers’
employment levels are unlikely to be
impacted by the Act. The impact of the
Act will most likely not be large enough
to increase production by
manufacturers, and dealers on average
will only be selling an additional 12
vehicles (250,000 estimated number of
vehicles sold during the program
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
divided by 19,700 dealers as of early
2009) during the course of the program.
Another benefit of the program is the
increased incorporation of improved
fuel efficiency into the on-road vehicle
fleet. This will decrease greenhouse
gases and criteria pollutants by
decreasing fuel consumption, resulting
in air pollution benefits. These benefits
are ultimately dependent upon which
types of vehicles consumers purchase.
Certain costs may be incurred by
dealers. However, the CARS Act
provides that dealers may retain up to
$50 from the scrap value of trade-in
vehicles to offset any administrative
costs of participating in the program.
Disposal facilities and salvage auctions
will also incur some costs in complying
with the Act. Related industries, such as
auto repair shops, may lose some profit
due to foregone repairs by vehicle
owners. Additionally, the Act may
shorten the vehicle life cycle depending
on the age and condition of the tradein vehicles.
Cost and benefit information
associated with this rulemaking is set
forth in the final regulatory impact
analysis prepared by NHTSA and
included in the public docket.
VII. Statutory Basis for This Action
This final rule implements the
Consumer Assistance to Recycle and
Save Act (Cars Act) (Pub. L. 111–32),
which directs the Secretary to issue
final regulations within 30 days after
enactment.
VIII. Effective Date
Section 1302(d) of the CARS Act
provides that notwithstanding the
requirements of section 553 of title 5,
United States Code, the Secretary shall
promulgate final regulations to
implement the Program not later than 30
days after the date of the enactment of
this Act. The agency finds that it has
good cause to make this rule effective
fewer than 30 days after the publication
in the Federal Register. The CARS
program is a short-term program that
Congress expected NHTSA to
implement promptly. Under the CARS
Act, a credit issued under the Program
may be used only in connection with
the purchase or qualifying lease of new
fuel efficient automobiles that occur
between July 1, 2009, and November 1,
2009. In view of the fact that the
regulations being published today have
not been previously available, sales of
new vehicles under the program have
not begun in volume. It would,
therefore, be inconsistent with
Congressional intent, impracticable, and
contrary to the public interest, to delay
the effective date of the regulations,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37895
which would, in turn, delay the
implementation of the program and
effectively compress its applicability.
This rulemaking is also major under
Chapter 8 of 5 U.S.C. (Congressional
Review of Agency Rulemakings)
because it has an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more. For
the same reasons noted in the prior
paragraph, we find good cause under
section 808 of Title 5 that notice and
public procedure are impracticable and
contrary to the public interest, and that
the rule shall take effect upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Accordingly, the effective date of this
final rule is July 29, 2009.
IX. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993), provides for making
determinations whether a regulatory
action is ’’significant’’ and therefore
subject to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) review and to the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Order defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or Tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
This rulemaking is economically
significant. Accordingly, OMB reviewed
it under Executive Order 12866. The
rule is also significant within the
meaning of the Department of
Transportation’s Regulatory Policies and
Procedures. The agency has prepared a
Final Regulatory Impact Analysis (FRIA)
and placed it in the docket and on the
agency’s Web site.
B. National Environmental Policy Act
NHTSA has considered this
rulemaking action for the purposes of
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). It is established law that NEPA
compliance is required unless there is a
clear conflict of statutory authority.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37896
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee,
inc. v. Atomic Energy Commission, 449
F.2d 1109 (D.C. Cir 1971). NEPA
analysis is not required where, as here,
a statutorily-mandated time frame for
the Government’s action does not
permit it. See, e.g., Flint Ridge
Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Ass’n
of Oklahoma, 426 U.S. 776 (1976) and
Kandra v. U.S., 145 F. Supp.2d 1192 (D.
Or. 2001). The Consumer Assistance to
Recycle and Save Act of 2009 requires
the Secretary of Transportation, through
NHTSA, to issue final regulations
within 30 days after enactment (i.e., by
July 24, 2009) and since it is impossible
to perform a NEPA analysis within this
tight time frame, no NEPA analysis is
required prior to issuing the final
regulation.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as
amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) of 1996), whenever an agency
is required to provide for notice and
comment for any proposed or final rule,
it must prepare and make available for
public comment a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effect of the
rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions). The
agency has not prepared a final
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
final rule because the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not require such an
analysis when a final rule was not
required to be preceded by an NPRM.23
As noted elsewhere in this preamble,
the agency determined that an NPRM
was not required for this rulemaking.
Nevertheless, the agency has examined
impacts on small entities, including
small businesses, and included them in
its regulatory analysis for this final rule.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
D. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), requires
NHTSA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ are defined in
23 The initial sentence of subsection (a), Section
604, Final regulatory flexibility analysis, of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act provides that when an
agency promulgates a final rule under section 553
of this title, after being required by that section or
any other law to publish a general notice of
proposed rulemaking, or promulgates a final
interpretative rule involving the internal revenue
laws of the United States as described in section
603(a), the agency shall prepare a final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Under
Executive Order 13132, the agency may
not issue a regulation with federalism
implications that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs and that is not
required by statute unless the Federal
Government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments or the agency consults
with State and local governments in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation. The agency also may not
issue a regulation with federalism
implications that preempts a State law
without consulting with State and local
officials.
NHTSA has examined today’s final
rule pursuant to Executive Order 13132
and concluded that consultation with
States, local governments, or their
representatives is not required. The
agency has concluded that the rule does
not have federalism implications,
because the rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and the
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This rule will
have no effect on the ability of States to
adopt and/or implement their own
incentive plans.
E. Executive Order 12988
Pursuant to Executive Order 12988,
‘‘Civil Justice Reform’’ the agency has
considered whether this final rule
would have any retroactive effect.
Agencies may promulgate retroactive
rules pursuant to the express authority
of Congress to do so. See, e.g., Bowen v.
Georgetown Univ. Hospital, 488 U.S.
204, 208 (1988); National Mining
Association v. Dep’t of Labor, 292 F.3d
849, 859 (D.C. Cir. 2002). On June 24,
2009, the President signed the CARS
Act into law (Pub. L. 111–32). The
CARS Act required the Secretary of
Transportation, acting through NHTSA,
to issue final regulations to implement
the program within 30 days after
enactment (i.e., by July 24, 2009).
However, the CARS Act provides that
the program covers eligible transactions
beginning on July 1, 2009, prior to
today’s final rule. Accordingly, as set
forth in today’s final rule, if transactions
occurring on or after July 1, 2009 but
prior to July 29, 2009 meet all of the
requirements identified in this final
rule, registered dealers may follow the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
application procedures of the rule and
apply for reimbursement for those
transactions.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.),
a person is not required to respond to
a collection of information by a Federal
agency unless the collection displays a
valid OMB control number. As part of
this final rule, the agency must among
other matters, request information from
persons to register as participating
dealers, provide a list of eligible
vehicles and process credit transactions
under the program.
The agency has received approval
from OMB to collect the following
information:
Title: CARS Program; Dealer
Information, OMB Control No. 2127–
0657, Expiration Date: December 31,
2009.
This approval covers NHTSA Form
1070. NHTSA has been given OMB
approval to collect 57,000 responses, for
a total of 11,395 burden hours.
Title: CARS Program; Disposal
Facility and Salvage Auction
Information, OMB Control No. 2127–
0658, Expiration Date: January 31, 2010.
This approval covers NHTSA Form
1073, ‘‘Disposal Facility Certification
Form’’ and NHTSA Form 1074,
‘‘Salvage Auction Certification Form.’’
NHTSA has been given OMB approval
to collect 3,750,000 responses, for a total
of 31,248 burden hours.
Title: CARS Program; Survey of
Customer Response to CARS Initiative,
OMB Control No. 2127–0659,
Expiration Date: January 31, 2010.
This approval covers NHTSA Form
1075, ‘‘Survey of Consumer Response to
CARS Initiative.’’ NHTSA has been
given OMB approval to collect 168,750
responses, for a total of 9,375 burden
hours.
Title: CARS Program; Dealer and
Buyer Transaction Information, OMB
Control No. 2127–0660, Expiration
Date: January 31, 2010.
This approval covers NHTSA Form
1071 ‘‘Transaction Form’’ (an electronic
form) and NHTSA Form 1072
‘‘Certifications and Summary of Sale
Language.’’ NHTSA has been given
OMB approval to collect 500,000
responses, for a total of 108,334 burden
hours.
G. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires Federal agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
more than $100 million annually
(adjusted for inflation with a base year
of 1995). This requirement, however,
only applies to ‘‘a final rule for which
a general notice of proposed rulemaking
was published’’; as noted earlier in this
final rule, an NPRM was not published.
H. Regulatory Identifier Number (RIN)
The Department of Transportation
assigns a regulation identifier number
(RIN) to each regulatory action listed in
the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. You may use the RIN contained in
the heading at the beginning of this
document to find this action in the
Unified Agenda.
I. Privacy Act
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 512
Administrative procedure and
practice, Confidential business
information, Freedom of information,
Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and
record keeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 599
Fuel economy, Motor vehicle safety.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA hereby amends 49 CFR Chapter
V as set forth below.
■
PART 512—CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 512
continues to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322; 5 U.S.C. 552; 49
U.S.C. 30166, 49 U.S.C. 30167; 49 U.S.C.
32307; 49 U.S.C. 32505; 49 U.S.C. 32708; 49
U.S.C. 32910; 49 U.S.C. 33116; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
2. Revise Appendix E to Part 512 to
read as follows:
■
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
(a) The Chief Counsel has determined that
the following information required to be
submitted to the agency under 49 CFR part
599, if released, is likely to cause substantial
harm to the competitive position of the entity
submitting the information:
(1) Vehicle Manufacturer Issued Dealer
Identification Code;
(2) Dealer Bank Name, ABA Routing
Number and Bank Account Number; and
(3) CARS Dealer Code and Authorization
Code.
(b) The Chief Counsel has determined that
the disclosure of the new vehicle owner’s
name, home address, telephone number, state
identification number and last six (6)
characters, when disclosed along with the
first eleven (11) characters, of the new
vehicle identification numbers reported in
transactions submitted to the agency under
49 CFR Part 599 will constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy
within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6).
3. Add Appendix F to part 512 to read
as follows:
■
Please note that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the complete User
Notice and Privacy Notice for
Regulations.gov at https://
www.regulations.gov/search/footer/
privacyanduse.jsp.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Appendix E to Part 512—Consumer
Assistance to Recycle and Save (CARS)
Class Determinations
Jkt 217001
Appendix F to Part 512—OMB
Clearance
The OMB clearance number for this part
512 is 2127–0025.
■
4. Add part 599 to read as follows:
PART 599—REQUIREMENTS AND
PROCEDURES FOR CONSUMER
ASSISTANCE TO RECYCLE AND SAVE
ACT PROGRAM
Subpart A—General
Sec.
599.100 Purpose.
599.101 Scope.
599.102 Definitions.
37897
trade-in vehicles under the CARS
program.
599.403 Requirements and limitations for
dealers.
Subpart E—Enforcement
599.500 Definitions.
599.501 Generally.
599.502 Record retention.
599.503 Access to records.
599.504 Suspension, revocation, and
reinstatement of registration and
participation eligibility.
599.505 Reports and investigations.
599.506 Notice of violation.
599.507 Disclosure of evidence.
599.508 Statements of matters in dispute
and submission of supporting
information.
599.509 Hearing officer.
599.510 Initiation of action before the
hearing officer.
599.511 Counsel.
599.512 Hearing location and costs.
599.513 Hearing procedures.
599.514 Assessment of civil penalties.
599.515 Appeals of civil penalties in excess
of $100,000.00.
599.516 Collection of assessed or
compromised civil penalties.
599.517 Other sanctions.
Appendix A to Part 599—Summary of Sale/
Lease and Certifications
Appendix B to Part 599—Engine Disablement
Procedures for the CARS Program
Appendix C to Part 599—Electronic
Transaction Screen
Appendix D to Part 599—CARS Purchaser
Survey
Appendix E to Part 599—Disposal Facility
Certification Form
Appendix F to Part 599—Salvage Auction
Certification Form
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 32901, Notes;
delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Subpart A—General
Subpart B—Participating Dealers, Salvage
Auctions and Disposal Facilities
599.200 Registration of participating
dealers.
599.201 Identification of salvage auctions
and disposal facilities.
§ 599.100
Purpose.
This part establishes requirements
and procedures implementing the
program authorized under the
Consumer Assistance to Recycle and
Save Act of 2009.
Subpart C—Qualifying Transactions and
Reimbursement
599.300 Requirements for qualifying
transactions.
599.301 Limitations and restrictions on
qualifying transactions.
599.302 Dealer application for
reimbursement—submission, contents.
599.303 Agency disposition of dealer
application for reimbursement.
599.304 Payment to dealer.
§ 599.101
Subpart D—Disposal of Trade-in Vehicle
599.400 Transfer or consignment by dealer
of trade-in vehicle.
599.401 Requirements and limitations for
disposal Facilities that receive trade-in
vehicles under the CARS program.
599.402 Requirements and limitations for
salvage auctions that are consigned
As used in this part—
Agency or NHTSA means the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
CARS Act means the Consumer
Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of
2009, Public Law 111–32, 123 Stat. 1859
(June 24, 2009).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Scope.
The requirements of this part apply to
new vehicle purchase or lease
transactions, in combination with tradein vehicle transactions that occur on or
after July 1, 2009 up to and including
November 1, 2009, and to the disposal
of trade-in vehicles under the CARS
Act.
§ 599.102
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
Definitions.
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37898
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
CARS Program means the program
authorized under the Consumer
Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of
2009, which NHTSA refers to as the Car
Allowance Rebate System.
Category 1 truck means a nonpassenger automobile, as defined in
section 49 U.S.C. 32901(a)(17) and 49
CFR 523.3, except that such term does
not include a category 2 truck.
Category 2 truck means a large van
with a wheelbase of 124 inches or more,
or a large pickup with a wheelbase of
115 inches or more.
Category 3 truck means a work truck,
as defined in 49 U.S.C. 32901(a)(19).
Clear title means title to a vehicle that
is free from all liens and encumbrances.
Combined Fuel Economy means—
(1) With respect to an eligible new
vehicle, the number, expressed in miles
per gallon, centered below the words
‘‘Combined Fuel Economy’’ on the label
required to be affixed or caused to be
affixed on a new automobile pursuant to
subpart D of 40 CFR part 600.
(2) With respect to an eligible tradein vehicle of model year 1985 or later,
the number posted under the words
‘‘Estimated New EPA MPG’’ or ‘‘New
EPA MPG’’ and above the word
‘‘Combined,’’ except that for a bi-fuel,
dual fuel, or flexible fueled vehicle, that
number must also be below the word
‘‘Gasoline,’’ on the fueleconomy.gov
Web site of the Environmental
Protection Agency for the make, model,
and year of such vehicle.
Credit means an electronic payment
to a dealer for a qualifying transaction
under the program.
Dealer means a person licensed by a
State who engages in the sale of a new
automobile to a person who in good
faith purchases such automobile for
purposes other than resale.
Disposal facility means a facility
listed on https://www.cars.gov/disposal
as eligible to receive a trade-in vehicle
for crushing or shredding under the
CARS program, except in the case of a
U.S. territory.
End-of-Life Vehicle Solutions or ELVS
means an entity established under the
National Vehicle Mercury Switch
Recovery Program for the collection,
recycling and disposal of elemental
mercury from automotive switches.
Engine block means the part of the
engine containing the cylinders and
typically incorporating water cooling
jackets and also including the crank
shaft, connecting rods, pistons, bearings,
cam(s), and cylinder head(s). In a rotary
engine, the block includes the rotor
housing and rotor.
GVWR means gross vehicle weight
rating.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Lease means a lease of a new vehicle
for a period of not less than 5 years,
excluding any lease with a balloon
payment due prior to the elapsing of 5
years.
Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price
or MSRP means the base Manufacturer’s
Suggested Retail Price, excluding any
dealer accessories, optional equipment,
taxes and destination charges.
National Motor Vehicle Title
Information System or NMVTIS means
the online system established under the
oversight of the Department of Justice
that enables consumers and others to
access vehicle history information,
including salvage history, total loss
information, and title branding and
odometer information, and to which
insurance companies and salvage yards
must report vehicle status information.
(https://www. nmvtis.gov.)
New Vehicle means an automobile or
work truck, the equitable or legal title of
which has not been transferred to any
person other than the purchaser.
Non-titling Jurisdiction means a State
that does not issue a title for certain
typically older vehicles.
Passenger automobile means a
passenger automobile, as defined in
section 49 U.S.C. 32901(a)(18) and 49
CFR 523.4.
Person means an individual,
corporation, company, association, firm,
partnership, society, or joint stock
company.
Purchaser means a person purchasing
or leasing a new vehicle under the
CARS Program.
Salvage auction means an entity that
receives a CARS trade-in vehicle from a
dealer and is authorized to sell it only
to a disposal facility on the Disposal
Facility List and that will make all the
necessary certifications for salvage
auctions under the CARS program.
State means any one of the 50 United
States, the District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa, or the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Subpart B—Participating Dealers,
Salvage Auctions and Disposal
Facilities
§ 599.200
dealers.
Registration of participating
(a) In general. A dealer may apply for
a credit under the CARS Program only
if it meets the Required Dealer
Qualifications for Registration under
this subpart, is registered in accordance
with this subpart, and is currently
registered at the time it submits an
application for reimbursement.
(b) Required dealer qualifications for
registration. A dealer seeking to register
must have:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(1) A currently operating new
automobile dealership and business
address within a State in the United
States;
(2) A currently active business license
under the law of the State where the
new automobile dealership is located to
operate that dealership;
(3) A currently active franchise
agreement to sell new automobiles with
an original equipment manufacturer of
automobiles;
(4) A bank account in a U.S. bank in
a State and a bank account routing
number for electronic transfer of funds;
(5) The ability to submit application
materials and perform transactions
electronically using the Internet; and
(6) Not been convicted of a crime
involving motor vehicles or any fraud or
financial crime under State or Federal
law.
(c) Registration procedures.
(1) Using comprehensive lists of
franchised dealers provided by original
equipment manufacturers, as updated
by these manufacturers, the agency will
mail a letter to each listed dealer
describing a secure electronic process
and providing an authorization code by
which the dealer, following the process
in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, can
effect registration.
(2) A dealer contacted in accordance
with paragraph (c)(1) of this section may
register electronically as a participating
dealer under the CARS Program by
using the authorization code and
following the instructions provided in
the letter mailed under paragraph (c)(1)
of this section, and submitting the
following information electronically or
validating the information, where it
exists already on an electronic form:
(i) Dealer’s Federal Tax Identification
Number (TIN) and OEM assigned dealer
franchise number;
(ii) Legal business name, doing
business as name (if applicable),
dealership physical and mailing
address, telephone number, and fax
number;
(iii) Name and title of dealer
representative authorized to submit
transactions under this program, and
phone number and e-mail address of
representative; and
(iv) Name of U.S. bank used by
dealership, bank account number, and
bank account routing number.
(3) A dealer must register separately,
following the process under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section, for each make of
vehicle it sells, using the authorization
code associated with that vehicle make.
(d) Disposition of registration
application. The agency will review the
registration application for compliance
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
with this part, including completeness,
and notify the dealer as follows:
(1) For an approved registration:
(i) By e-mail notification to the
authorized dealer representative, with a
user identification and password that
will allow the submission of
transactions; and
(ii) By listing the ‘‘doing business as’’
name, physical address, and general
telephone number of the dealer on the
agency Web site at https://www.cars.gov.
(2) For a disapproved registration, by
withholding the dealer identification
information from the agency’s Web site
and providing e-mail notification to the
authorized dealer representative of the
reasons for rejecting the application.
(e) Revocation of Dealer Registration.
(1) Termination or Discontinuance of
Franchise.
(i) A dealer whose franchise
agreement with an original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) has expired
without renewal, has been terminated,
or otherwise is no longer in effect shall
be automatically removed as a matter of
course, subject to paragraph (e)(1)(iii),
from the agency’s list of registered
dealers and may no longer receive a
credit for new transactions under the
CARS Program submitted for repayment
on or after the date that the franchise
expired or no longer is in effect.
(ii) Paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section
does not preclude a dealer registered
under other franchise agreements from
receiving a credit for transactions under
those agreements that have not expired
or been discontinued.
(iii) A dealer whose name is removed
from the agency’s list of registered
dealers under paragraph (e)(1)(i) shall be
reinstated to the list of registered dealers
upon a showing to NHTSA of proper
and adequate license to sell new
vehicles to ultimate purchasers.
(2) Other suspension or revocations
actions. The agency may also suspend
or revoke the registration of a dealer as
provided in § 599.504.
(f) Notification of changes. A
registered dealer shall immediately
notify the agency of any change to the
information submitted under this
section and any change to the status of
its State license or franchise.
(g) Pre-registration transactions. An
otherwise qualifying transaction that
occurs during the time period
prescribed under § 599.301(a) is not a
non-complying transaction solely
because a dealer is not registered at the
time of the transaction, except that the
dealer must be eligible to register and
must register under § 599.200 in order to
be entitled to reimbursement for a credit
extended under the CARS program.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
§ 599.201 Identification of salvage
auctions and disposal facilities.
(a) Participating entities. Subject to
the conditions and requirements of
paragraph (b), participation in the
transfer and disposal of a trade-in
vehicle under the CARS program is
limited to the following entities:
(1) A salvage auction that will transfer
trade-in vehicles received under this
program only to a disposal facility
identified in paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(3) of
this section.
(2) A disposal facility listed on the
Web site at https://www.cars.gov/
disposal; or
(3) A facility that disposes of vehicles
in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands,
Guam, American Samoa, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
(b) Conditions of Participation. A
participating entity identified in
paragraph (a) of this section must:
(1) Comply with all the provisions
and restrictions and make all the
required certifications contained in
subpart D of this part.
(2) In the case of a disposal facility
identified in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, be currently listed on the Web
site at https://www.cars.gov/disposal, as
of the date of its participation in the
disposal of the trade-in vehicle.
(c) Removal of authority to
participate.
(1) A disposal facility that qualifies as
such by active membership in ELVS and
that fails to maintain active ELVS
membership may be automatically
removed as a matter of course from the
agency’s list of disposal facilities
maintained at https://www.cars.gov/
disposal authorized to participate in the
CARS program.
(2) The agency may also suspend or
remove a salvage auction’s or disposal
facility’s authority to participate in the
CARS program in accordance with the
procedures of § 599.504.
Subpart C—Qualifying Transactions
and Reimbursement
599.300 Requirements for qualifying
transactions.
(a) In general. To qualify for a credit
under the CARS Program, a dealer must
sell or lease a new vehicle that meets
eligibility requirements to a purchaser,
obtain a trade-in vehicle that meets
eligibility requirements from the
purchaser, satisfy combined fuel
economy requirements for both the new
and trade-in vehicles, disable the engine
of the trade-in vehicle, satisfy the
limitations and restrictions of the
program, arrange for disposal of the
trade-in vehicle at a qualifying disposal
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37899
facility or through a qualifying salvage
auction, and register and submit a
complete application for reimbursement
to NHTSA, demonstrating that it meets
all the requirements of this part.
(b) Threshold eligibility requirements
that apply to all trade-in vehicles. The
trade-in vehicle must be:
(1) In drivable condition, as
demonstrated by actual operation of the
motor vehicle on public roads by the
dealer and by certification by the dealer
and by the purchaser, as provided in
Appendix A to this part, certifications
section, that the vehicle was in drivable
condition on the date of the qualifying
transaction;
(2) Continuously insured consistent
with the applicable State law for a
period of not less than 1 year
immediately prior to the trade-in, as
demonstrated by:
(i) One or more current insurance
cards specifying the make, model,
model year, and vehicle identification
number (VIN) of the insured vehicle and
displaying a continuous one-year period
of insurance coverage; or a copy of an
insurance policy document (e.g., a
declarations page or pages) showing a
continuous one-year period of insurance
coverage for the vehicle; or a signed
letter, on insurance company letterhead,
specifying the same vehicle
identification information (i.e., make,
model, model year, and VIN) of the
insured vehicle and identifying the
period of continuous coverage, which
must be for at least one year prior to the
date of the trade-in; and
(ii) By certification by the purchaser,
as provided in Appendix A to this part,
certifications section, that the vehicle
was so insured;
(3) Continuously registered in a State
to the purchaser for a period of not less
than one year immediately prior to the
trade-in, as demonstrated by:
(i) A current State registration
document or series of registration
documents in the name of the purchaser
evidencing registration for a period of
not less than one year immediately prior
to the trade-in; or a current State
registration document showing
registration in the name of the purchaser
and a title that confers title on the
purchaser not less than one year
immediately prior to the trade-in; or a
current State registration document
showing registration in the name of the
purchaser and a document from a
commercially available vehicle history
provider evidencing registration for a
period of not less than one year
immediately prior to the trade-in; and
(ii) By certification by the purchaser,
as provided in Appendix A to this part,
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37900
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
certifications section, that the vehicle
was so registered;
(4) Manufactured less than 25 years
before the date of the trade-in, as
demonstrated by model year
information on the title or, where that
information is inconclusive, by direct
observation by the dealer of the month
and year of the vehicle’s manufacture,
which appears on the safety standard
certification label of the vehicle,
provided that on the 25th year, the 25year requirement is satisfied if the
manufacture date falls anytime within
the month 25 years before the date of
trade-in, and by certification by the
dealer, as provided in Appendix A to
this part, certifications section, that the
manufacture date is less than 25 years
before the date of trade-in.
(c) Threshold eligibility requirements
that apply to all new vehicles. The new
vehicle must:
(1) Be either purchased or leased for
a lease period of not less than 5 years;
(2) Have a manufacturer’s suggested
retail price of $45,000 or less.
(d) Trade-in vehicle—disclosure of
scrap value, engine disablement, and
title marking. As part of a qualifying
transaction under this part, and prior to
submitting an application for
reimbursement under § 599.302, the
dealer shall:
(1) During the transaction, disclose to
the person purchasing or leasing an
eligible new vehicle and trading in an
eligible trade-in vehicle, the best
estimate of the scrap value of the tradein vehicle, inform that person that the
dealer is authorized to retain $50 of this
amount as payment for its
administrative costs of participation in
the program, and certify, as provided in
Appendix A to this part, certifications
section, that it has made such
disclosure;
(2) Except as provided in paragraph
(e) of this section, disable the engine of
the eligible trade-in vehicle, following
the procedures set forth in Appendix B
to this part, and certify, as provided in
Appendix A to this part, certifications
section, that it has disabled the engine;
and
(3) Legibly mark the front and back of
the trade-in vehicle’s title in prominent
letters that do not obscure the owner’s
name, VIN, or other writing as follows:
‘‘Junk Automobile, CARS.gov.’’
(e) Dealer transfers prior to July 24,
2009.
(1) Subject to the provisions of
paragraph (e)(2) of this section, if the
dealer transferred the vehicle prior to
July 24, 2009, the dealer may either:
(i) Locate the vehicle, disable its
engine following the procedures set for
the in Appendix B to this part, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
provide the certification in Appendix A
to this part, certifications section, that it
has disabled the engine; or
(ii) Obtain a sworn affidavit from a
disposal facility that it has crushed or
shredded the vehicle, including the
engine block, and provide supporting
documents sufficient to establish that
fact.
(2) The dealer and disposal facility
must comply with all other
requirements of this part, including the
requirement that the trade-in vehicle be
crushed or shredded, except that the
affidavit and supporting documents
provided for under paragraph (e)(1)(ii)
of this section may substitute for the
disposal facility certification form.
(f) Qualifying transactions ($3,500
Credit). Subject to the requirements of
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), and, if
applicable, paragraph (e) of this section
and the additional requirements of
§§ 599.301, 599.302, and 599.303 of this
subpart, each of the following
transactions qualifies for a credit of
$3,500 under this program:
(1) The new vehicle is a passenger
automobile with a combined fuel
economy of at least 22 mpg, the eligible
trade-in vehicle has a combined fuel
economy of 18 mpg or less and is a
passenger automobile, category 1 truck,
or category 2 truck, and the combined
fuel economy of the new vehicle is at
least 4 mpg, but less than 10 mpg higher
than the combined fuel economy of the
eligible trade-in vehicle.
(2) The new vehicle is a category 1
truck with a combined fuel economy of
at least 18 mpg, the eligible trade-in
vehicle has a combined fuel economy of
18 mpg or less and is a passenger
automobile, category 1 truck, or category
2 truck, and the combined fuel economy
of the new vehicle is at least 2 mpg, but
less than 5 mpg higher than the
combined fuel economy of the eligible
trade-in vehicle.
(3) The new vehicle is a category 2
truck with a combined fuel economy of
at least 15 mpg, the eligible trade-in
vehicle has a combined fuel economy of
18 mpg or less and is a category 2 truck,
and the combined fuel economy of the
new vehicle is 1 mpg higher than the
combined fuel economy of the eligible
trade-in vehicle.
(4) The new vehicle is a category 2
truck with a combined fuel economy of
at least 15 mpg and the eligible tradein vehicle is a category 3 truck of model
year 2001 or earlier.
(5) The new vehicle is a category 3
truck, the eligible trade-in vehicle is a
category 3 truck of model year 2001 or
earlier, and the new fuel efficient
vehicle has a GVWR less than or equal
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to the GVWR of the eligible trade-in
vehicle.
(g) Qualifying transactions ($4,500
Credit). Subject to the requirements of
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), and, if
applicable, paragraph (e) of this section
and the additional requirements of
§§ 599.301, 599.302, and 599.303 of this
subpart, each of the following
transactions qualifies for a credit of
$4,500 under this program:
(1) The new vehicle is a passenger
automobile with a combined fuel
economy of at least 22 mpg, the eligible
trade-in vehicle has a combined fuel
economy of 18 mpg or less and is a
passenger automobile, category 1 truck,
or category 2 truck, and the combined
fuel economy of the new vehicle is at
least 10 mpg higher than the combined
fuel economy of the eligible trade-in
vehicle.
(2) The new vehicle is a category 1
truck with a combined fuel economy of
at least 18 mpg, the eligible trade-in
vehicle has a combined fuel economy of
18 mpg or less and is a passenger
automobile, category 1 truck, or category
2 truck, and the combined fuel economy
of the new vehicle is at least 5 mpg
higher than the combined fuel economy
of the eligible trade-in vehicle.
(3) The new vehicle is a category 2
truck with a combined fuel economy of
at least 15 mpg, the eligible trade-in
vehicle has a combined fuel economy of
18 mpg or less and is a category 2 truck,
and the combined fuel economy of the
new vehicle is at least 2 mpg higher
than the combined fuel economy of the
eligible trade-in vehicle.
(h) No other qualifying transactions.
Transactions described under
paragraphs (f) and (g) of this section are
the only transactions that qualify for
payment of a credit to a dealer under the
CARS Program.
§ 599.301 Limitations and restrictions on
qualifying transactions.
(a) Date of transaction. A qualifying
transaction may not occur on a date
before July 1, 2009 or after November 1,
2009, and is subject to available agency
funds for the CARS Program.
(b) One credit per transaction. Only
one credit may be applied towards the
purchase or lease price of each new
vehicle.
(c) One credit per person. A person
that participates in a transaction for
which a credit is issued under the CARS
Program, whether as a single owner or
a joint-registered owner of either an
eligible trade-in vehicle, a new vehicle,
or both, may not participate or be
named in another transaction for which
a credit is issued under the CARS
program, either as a registered owner of
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the trade-in vehicle or as a purchaser of
the new vehicle.
(d) Transfer of title.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section, a dealer may not
apply for or receive reimbursement for
a credit extended to a purchaser under
a CARS program transaction unless it
has been conveyed clear title and
physically possesses the title to the
trade-in vehicle.
(2) In the case of a trade-in vehicle
registered in a State that is a non-titling
jurisdiction and that, in accordance
with State law, has no title, the
requirement in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section that clear title be conveyed is
satisfied if the purchaser shows proof of
registration in the purchaser’s name and
provides a bill of sale conferring
ownership of the trade-in vehicle to the
dealer.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 599.302 Dealer application for
reimbursement—submission, contents.
(a) In general. A dealer’s application
for reimbursement must demonstrate
that the requirements and limitations
governing qualifying transactions in
§ 599.300 and § 599.301 of this subpart
have been met, and must comply with
the submission and contents
requirements of this section.
(b) Electronic submission. The
application for reimbursement must be
submitted by using the login and
password provided under
§ 599.200(d)(1) and following the
procedures provided in the letter mailed
under § 599.200(c)(1) of this part.
(c) Application contents. An
application shall consist of an electronic
transaction form (portion reproduced in
Appendix C to this part) requiring input
of information into relevant fields,
electronic copies of supporting
documents, and applicable
certifications, as provided in Appendix
A to this part, certifications section. As
its application for each transaction, the
dealer shall:
(1) Input the following information
into relevant fields on the transaction
form:
(i) Purchaser information.
(A) Name. The first name, middle
initial and last name of each purchaser,
if an individual, or the full legal name
of the company, association or other
organization that is the purchaser.
(B) Residence address (or, for an
organization, business address). The full
address of each purchaser.
(C) Driver’s license or State
identification number. The State
driver’s license or State identification
number of each purchaser or, for an
organization, its tax identification
number.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
(ii) Trade-in vehicle information.
(A) Make. The make of the vehicle.
(B) Model. The model of the vehicle.
(C) Model year. The model year of the
vehicle.
(D) Vehicle identification number
(VIN). The 17 digit VIN of the vehicle.
(E) CARS Act vehicle category. The
category of vehicle as defined under the
CARS Act. (Enter, as applicable,
passenger automobile, category 1 truck,
category 2 truck or category 3 truck.)
(F) State of title.
(G) State of registration.
(H) Start date of registration.
(I) Start date of insurance.
(J) End date of registration.
(K) Odometer reading. The odometer
reading of the vehicle at the time of the
trade-in.
(L) EPA combined fuel economy. The
listed EPA combined fuel economy of
the vehicle.
(M) Vehicle description. The exact
‘‘vehicle description’’ for the vehicle
found on https://www.fueleconomy.gov.
(iii) New vehicle information.
(A) Make. The make of the vehicle.
(B) Model. The model of the vehicle.
(C) Model year. The model year of the
vehicle.
(D) Vehicle identification number
(VIN). The 17 digit VIN of the vehicle.
(E) EPA combined fuel economy. The
listed EPA combined fuel economy of
the vehicle.
(F) CARS Act vehicle category. The
category of vehicle as defined under the
CARS Act. (Enter, as applicable,
passenger automobile, category 1 truck,
category 2 truck or category 3 truck.)
(G) Base manufacturer’s suggested
retail price (MSRP). The price of the
new vehicle affixed to the Monroney
label prior to the addition of any
options, features, taxes or destination
charges.
(H) Vehicle description. The exact
‘‘vehicle description’’ for the vehicle
found on https://www.fueleconomy.gov.
(iv) Trade-in vehicle disposition
information.
(A) Identification of entity. The name,
address and telephone number of the
disposal facility or salvage auction to
which the vehicle will be or has been
transferred or consigned.
(B) Disposal facility number. The
unique identifier assigned to the
disposal facility identified on the CARS
Web site, and to which the vehicle is
being transferred or consigned.
(v) Transaction information.
(A) Date of sale or lease. The date on
which the vehicle transaction with the
purchaser occurred.
(B) Transaction request amount. The
amount of the credit for which the
dealer is applying.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37901
(2) Attach the following supporting
documentation in electronic format
(pdf, tif, jpeg) in the following order:
(i) Proof of title. A copy of the front
and back of the title of the trade-in
vehicle, showing assignment to the
dealer free and clear of any lien or
encumbrance on the vehicle’s title, with
the ‘‘Junk Automobile, CARS.gov’’
marking on both sides.
(ii) Proof of insurance. A copy of
insurance policy cards or documents for
the trade-in vehicle to confirm that the
trade-in vehicle insurance was
continuous for a period of not less than
one year prior to trade in.
(iii) Proof of registration. A copy of
the registration card or documents for
the trade-in vehicle identifying the
owner, the vehicle, and dates of
registration to confirm that the vehicle
was registered to the purchaser for a
period of not less than one year prior to
trade in.
(iv) Purchaser identification.
(v) Summary of sale/lease and
certifications form (Appendix A to this
part, summary section).
(vi) Manufacturer certificate of origin
or manufacturer statement of origin of
the new vehicle.
(vii) CARS purchaser survey.
(viii) Fueleconomy.gov side-by-side
comparison of the trade-in vehicle and
the new vehicle.
(ix) Certification from salvage auction
or disposal facility.
(x) Copy of vehicle sales or lease
contract.
(3) Make the certifications provided in
Appendix A to this part, certifications
section.
599.303 Agency disposition of dealer
application for reimbursement.
(a) Application review. Upon receipt
of an application for reimbursement, the
agency shall review the application to
determine whether it is complete and
satisfies all the requirements of this
subpart.
(b) Complying application. An
application that is determined to meet
all the requirements of this subpart shall
be approved for payment, in accordance
with the provisions of § 599.304.
(c) Non-complying application. An
application that is incomplete or that
otherwise fails to meet all the
requirements of this subpart shall be
rejected, and the submitter shall be
informed electronically of the reason for
rejection. NHTSA shall have no
obligation to correct a non-conforming
submission.
(d) Electronic rejection. An
application is automatically rejected,
with system notification to the
tendering dealer, if the transaction falls
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37902
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
outside of the permissible time period,
exceeds the permissible MSRP,
identifies a purchaser that has
participated in a previous transaction,
or identifies the vehicle identification
number of a new or trade-in vehicle that
was involved in a previous transaction.
(e) Correction and resubmission. A
dealer may correct and resubmit a
rejected application for reimbursement,
without penalty.
§ 599.304
Payment to dealer.
Upon completion of review of an
application for reimbursement from a
registered dealer that satisfies all the
requirements of this part, the agency
shall reimburse the dealer, by electronic
transfer to the account identified under
the process in § 599.200(c) of this part.
Subpart D—Disposal of Trade-in
Vehicle
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 599.400 Transfer or consignment by
dealer of trade-in vehicle.
(a) In general.
(1) A trade-in vehicle accepted as part
of an eligible transaction may be
provided for disposal by a dealer either
to a disposal facility or to a salvage
auction, as described in and subject to
the conditions of § 599.201 of this part.
(2) Dealers, disposal facilities, and
salvage auctions involved in the
disposal of the trade-in vehicle must
each comply with the applicable
provisions of this subpart.
(b) Transfer by dealer or salvage
auction to a disposal facility. If the
trade-in vehicle is transferred by the
dealer or salvage auction to a disposal
facility, the disposal facility must, as a
condition of the transfer:
(1) Make the certifications contained
in the Disposal Facility Certification
Form in Appendix E to this part, signed
by an official with authority to bind the
disposal facility;
(2) At the time of the transfer, deliver
the signed Disposal Facility
Certification Form to the dealer or
salvage auction that transferred the
trade-in vehicle; and
(3) Comply with the requirements and
limitations of § 599.401.
(c) Consignment by dealer to a salvage
auction. If the trade-in vehicle is
consigned by the dealer to a salvage
auction, the salvage auction must, as a
condition of the consignment:
(1) Make the certifications contained
in the Salvage Auction Certification
Form in Appendix F to this part, signed
by an official with authority to bind the
salvage auction;
(2) At the time of the consignment,
deliver the signed Salvage Auction
Certification Form to the dealer that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
authorized the salvage auction to sell
the trade-in vehicle.
(1) Make the certifications contained
in the Salvage Auction Certification
Form to the dealer that authorized the
salvage auction to sell the trade-in
vehicle; and
(3) Comply with the requirements and
limitations of § 599.402.
§ 599.401 Requirements and limitations for
disposal facilities that receive trade-in
vehicles under the CARS program.
(a) The disposal facility must:
(1) Not more than 7 days after
receiving the vehicle, report the vehicle
to NMVTIS as a scrap vehicle.
(2) Remove and dispose of all
refrigerants, antifreeze, lead products,
mercury switches, and such other toxic
or hazardous vehicle components prior
to crushing or shredding in accordance
with applicable Federal and State
requirements;
(3) Crush or shred the trade-in vehicle
onsite, including the engine block and
the drive train (unless with respect to
the drive train, the transmission, drive
shaft, and rear end are sold separately),
using its own machinery or a mobile
crusher, within 180 days after receipt of
the vehicle from the dealer or salvage
auction;
(4) Not more than 7 days after the
vehicle is crushed or shredded, report
the vehicle to NMVTIS as crushed or
shredded.
(b) The disposal facility may not sell
or transfer the engine block of the
vehicle or, except as allowed under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the drive
train before they are crushed or
shredded or otherwise allow the vehicle
to leave the disposal facility before it is
crushed or shredded.
(c) The disposal facility may:
(1) Sell any part of the vehicle other
than the engine block or drive train;
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(1)
of this section, sell the drive train
provided the transmission, drive shaft,
and rear end are sold as separate parts;
(3) Retain the proceeds from parts
sold under this paragraph.
§ 599.402 Requirements and limitations for
salvage auctions that are consigned tradein vehicles under the CARS program.
(a) The salvage auction must:
(1) Within 3 days after the date the
dealer consigns the vehicle or prior to
auctioning the vehicle, whichever is
earlier, report the status of the vehicle
to NMVTIS;
(2) Limit participation in the auction
to disposal facilities that, when the
auction is held:
(i) Appear on the list identified in
§ 599.201(a)(2) or are described in
§ 599.201(a)(3); and
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(ii) Agree to make the certifications in
the Salvage Auction Certification Form
(Appendix F to this part).
(3) As a condition of transferring title
to the disposal facility, obtain from that
facility the signed Disposal Facility
Certification Form (Appendix E to this
part), insert on the top of the form the
appropriate CARS invoice number
received from the dealer, if known, and
provide the form to NHTSA at
disposal@cars.gov, and include that
invoice number in the e-mail subject
line.
(b) [Reserved]
§ 599.403
dealers.
Requirements and limitations for
A dealer receiving a Disposal Facility
Certification Form or Salvage Auction
Certification Form under § 599.400(b)(2)
or (c)(2) shall insert on the top of the
form the appropriate CARS invoice
number, if known, and within 7 days of
receipt, submit such certification form
to NHTSA at disposal@cars.gov.
Subpart E—Enforcement
§ 599.500
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Administrator means the
Administrator of the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, or his or
her designee.
Chief Counsel means the NHTSA
Chief Counsel, or his or her designee.
Hearing Officer means a NHTSA
employee who has been delegated the
authority to assess civil penalties.
NHTSA Enforcement means the
NHTSA Associate Administrator for
Enforcement, or his or her designee.
Notice of violation means a
notification of violation and preliminary
assessment of penalty issued by the
Chief Counsel to a party.
Party means the person alleged to
have committed a violation of the CARS
Act, regulations thereunder, or other
applicable law, and includes an
individual, a public or private
corporation, and a partnership or other
association.
Violation means any nonconformance with the CARS Act or the
regulations in this part except
§ 599.200(e)(1)(i) and § 599.201(c)(1),
the submission of incomplete or
inaccurate information to NHTSA or an
entity identified under this part, or the
failure to maintain records, to permit
access to records or to update
information that has been submitted to
NHTSA under this part, but does not
include a clerical error. In the context of
dealer registration and disposal facility
or salvage auction participation
eligibility, violation also includes any
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
conviction of a crime involving motor
vehicles or any fraud or financial crime
under State or Federal law.
reproduction or transfer, and when so
reproduced or transferred the original
form may be treated as a duplicate.
§ 599.501
§ 599.503
Generally.
The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 554, 556
and 557 do not apply to any
proceedings conducted pursuant to this
subpart.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 599.502
Record retention.
(a) Manufacturers, dealers, salvage
auctions, and disposal facilities shall
keep records of all transactions under
the CARS Act and regulations
thereunder for a period of five calendar
years from the date on which they were
generated or acquired by the
manufacturer, salvage auction, dealer, or
disposal facility, and shall promptly
make those records available to NHTSA
Enforcement or DOT’s Office of the
Inspector General upon request.
(b) Records to be retained under this
subpart include all documentary
materials and other information-storing
media that contain information
concerning transactions under the CARS
Program, including any material
generated or communicated by
computer, electronic mail, or other
electronic means. Such records include,
but are not limited to, lists,
compilations, certifications, dealer
application information, salvage auction
or disposal facility information, owner
eligibility information, vehicle
eligibility information (including
vehicle fuel economy), dealer
applications for reimbursement under
the program, vehicle identification
number data, vehicle ownership
information, vehicle title, registration
and insurance information, sales
agreements, bills of sale, lease
agreements, manufacturer’s certificate or
statement of origin, other rebate and/or
incentive programs used in conjunction
with transactions under the program,
bank account and routing number
information, electronic funds transfer
and payment information, reports made
to the National Motor Vehicle Title
Information System (NMVTIS), reports
regarding vehicle scrappage values and
payment, reports in connection with the
transfer of vehicles to salvage auctions
and disposal facilities; reports from
disposal facilities in connection with
the crushing or shredding of vehicles
under the program, and any other
documents that are related to
transactions.
(c) Duplicate copies need not be
retained. Information may be
reproduced or transferred from one
storage medium to another (e.g., from
electronic format to CD–ROM) as long as
no information is lost in the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Access to records.
The Administrator shall have the right
to enter onto the premises of
manufacturers, dealers, salvage auctions
and disposal facilities during normal
business hours in order to: access,
inspect and audit records and other
sources of information maintained by
any of these entities under this Program;
to inspect vehicles traded in or sold
under this program, including taking all
actions necessary to determine whether
trade-in vehicles have operative
engines; and/or to interview persons
who may have relevant knowledge.
§ 599.504 Suspension, revocation, and
reinstatement of registration and
participation eligibility.
(a) Suspension or revocation of dealer
registration, or salvage auction or
disposal facility participation eligibility.
(1) When the NHTSA Chief Counsel
determines that a violation has likely
occurred, the Administrator may notify
the dealer, salvage auction or disposal
facility in writing of the facts giving rise
to the allegation of a violation and the
proposed length of a suspension, if
applicable, or revocation of registration,
in the case of a dealer, or participation
eligibility in the case of a salvage
auction or disposal facility.
(2) The notice shall afford the dealer,
salvage auction or disposal facility an
opportunity to present data, views, and
arguments, in writing and/or in person,
within 30 days of the date of the notice,
as to whether the violation occurred,
why its registration or participation
eligibility ought not to be suspended or
revoked, or whether the suspension
should be shorter than proposed. The
Administrator may, for good cause,
reduce the time allowed for response.
(3) If the Administrator decides, on
the basis of the available information,
that the dealer, salvage auction or
disposal facility has committed a
violation, the Administrator may
suspend or revoke the dealer
registration or the participation
eligibility of the salvage auction or
disposal facility.
(4) The Administrator shall notify the
dealer, salvage auction or disposal
facility in writing of the decision,
including the reasons for it. The
decision shall reflect the gravity of the
offense.
(5) A suspension or revocation is
effective as of the date of the
Administrator’s written notification,
unless another date is specified therein.
(6) The Administrator shall state the
period of any suspension in the notice
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37903
to the dealer, salvage auction or disposal
facility.
(7) There shall be no opportunity to
seek reconsideration of the
Administrator’s decision issued under
this paragraph (a).
(b) Reinstatement of suspended
registration or participation eligibility.
(1) When a registration or
participation eligibility has been
suspended under this subpart, the
registration or participation eligibility
will be reinstated after the expiration of
the period of suspension specified by
the Administrator, or such earlier date
as the Administrator may subsequently
decide is appropriate.
(2) Reinstatement is automatically
effective as of the date previously set
forth in the Administrator’s written
notification of suspension, unless
another date is specified by the
Administrator in writing.
(c) Effect of suspension or revocation
of registration or participation
eligibility.
(1) If a dealer’s registration or a
salvage auction or disposal facility’s
participation eligibility is suspended or
revoked, as of the date of suspension or
revocation, the dealer, salvage auction
or disposal facility will not be
considered registered or eligible to
participate in the CARS Program, and
must cease participating in the program.
(2) A dealer whose registration has
been suspended will not be entitled to
any rights or reimbursement of funds for
new transactions submitted as of the
effective date of the suspension or
revocation.
(3) NHTSA may take such action as
appropriate, including publication, to
provide notice that a dealer’s
registration, or salvage auction’s or
disposal facility’s participation
eligibility has been suspended or
revoked.
§ 599.505
Reports and investigations.
(a) Any person may report an
apparent violation of the CARS Act or
regulations issued thereunder to
NHTSA.
(b) NHTSA may independently
monitor for violations of the CARS Act
or regulations issued thereunder.
(c) When a report of an apparent
violation has been received by NHTSA,
or when an apparent violation has been
detected by any person working for
NHTSA, the matter may be investigated
or evaluated by NHTSA Enforcement. If
NHTSA Enforcement believes that a
violation may have occurred, NHTSA
Enforcement may prepare a report and
send the report to the NHTSA Chief
Counsel.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37904
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(d) The NHTSA Chief Counsel will
review the reports prepared by NHTSA
Enforcement to determine if there is
sufficient information to establish a
likely violation.
(1) The matter may be returned to
NHTSA Enforcement for further
investigation, if warranted.
(2) The Chief Counsel may close a
matter. A matter may be closed if, for
example, the investigation has
established that a violation did not
occur, the alleged violator is unknown,
there is insufficient information to
support the existence of a violation and
little likelihood of discovering
additional relevant facts, or the
magnitude of the matter is, under the
circumstances, including availability of
resources, insufficient to be pursued
further.
(3) If the Chief Counsel determines
that a violation has likely occurred, the
Chief Counsel may:
(i) Issue a Notice of Violation to the
party, and/or
(ii) In the case of a dealer recommend
that the Administrator suspend or
revoke registration in the program or in
the case of a salvage auction or disposal
facility, recommend that the
Administrator suspend or revoke
participation eligibility in the program.
(4) In the case of either paragraphs
(d)(3)(i) or (ii) of this section, the
NHTSA Chief Counsel will prepare a
case file with recommended actions. A
record of any prior violations by the
same person or entity, shall be
forwarded with the case file.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 599.506
Notice of Violation.
(a) The agency has the authority to
assess a civil penalty for any violation
of the CARS Act or this part. The
penalty may not be more than $15,000
for each violation.
(b) The Chief Counsel may issue a
Notice of Violation to a party. Notice of
Violation will contain the following
information:
(1) The name and address of the party;
(2) The alleged violation and the
applicable law or regulations violated;
(3) The amount of the maximum
penalty that may be assessed for each
violation;
(4) The amount of proposed penalty;
(5) A statement that payment of the
proposed penalty within 30 days will
settle the case without admission of
liability;
(6) The place to which, and the
manner in which, payment is to be
made;
(7) A statement that the party may
decline the Notice of Violation and that
if the Notice of Violation is declined,
the party has the right to a hearing prior
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
to a final assessment of a penalty by a
Hearing Officer.
(8) A statement that failure to either
pay the proposed penalty on the Notice
of Violation or to decline the Notice of
Violation and request a hearing within
30 days of the date shown on the Notice
of Violation will result in a finding of
violation by default and that NHTSA
will proceed with the civil penalty in
the amount proposed on the Notice of
Violation without processing the
violation under the hearing procedures
set forth in this subpart.
(c) The Notice of Violation may be
delivered to the party by:
(1) Hand-delivery to the party or an
employee of the party;
(2) Mailing to the party (certified mail
is not required);
(3) Use of an overnight or express
courier service; or
(4) Facsimile transmission or
electronic mail (with or without
attachments) to the party or an
employee of the party.
(d) If a party submits a written request
for a hearing as provided in the Notice
of Violation within 30 days of the date
shown on the Notice of Violation, the
case file will be sent to the Hearing
Officer for processing under the hearing
procedures set forth in this subpart.
(e) If a party pays the proposed
penalty on the Notice of Violation or an
amount agreed on in compromise
within 30 days of the date shown on the
Notice of Violation, a finding of
‘‘resolved with payment’’ will be
entered into the case file. Such payment
shall not be an admission of liability.
(f) If the party agrees to pay the
proposed penalty, but has not made
payment within 30 days of the date
shown on the Notice of Violation,
NHTSA will enter a finding of violation
by default in the matter and NHTSA
will proceed with the civil penalty in
the amount proposed on the Notice of
Violation without processing the
violation under the hearing procedures
set forth in this subpart.
(g) If within 30 days of the date shown
on the Notice of Violation a party fails
to pay the proposed penalty on the
Notice of Violation; and fails to request
a hearing, then NHTSA will enter a
finding of violation by default in the
case file, and will assess the civil
penalty in the amount set forth on the
Notice of Violation without processing
the violation under the hearing
procedures set forth in this subpart.
(h) NHTSA’s order assessing the civil
penalty following a party’s default is
final agency action.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 599.507
Disclosure of evidence.
The alleged violator may, upon
request, receive a free copy of all the
written evidence in the case file, except
material that would disclose or could
lead to the disclosure of the identity of
a confidential source. Following a
timely request for a hearing, other
evidence or material, if any, of whatever
source or nature, may be examined at
the Hearing Officer’s offices or such
other places and locations that the
Hearing Officer may, in writing, direct,
if there are adequate safeguards to
prevent loss or tampering.
§ 599.508 Statements of matters in dispute
and submission of supporting information.
(a) Within 30 days of the date shown
on the Notice of Violation, the party, or
counsel for the party, shall submit to
NHTSA at the person or office listed in
the Notice of Violation two complete
copies via hand delivery, use of an
overnight or express courier service,
facsimile or electronic mail of:
(1) A detailed statement of factual and
legal issues in dispute; and,
(2) All statements and documents
supporting the party’s case.
(b) One copy of the party’s submission
set forth above shall be labeled ‘‘For
Hearing Officer.’’
(c) Failure to specify any nonjurisdictional issue in the party’s
submission will preclude its
consideration.
§ 599.509
Hearing Officer.
(a) If a party timely requests a hearing
after receiving a Notice of Violation, the
Hearing Officer shall hear the case.
(b) The Hearing Officer is solely
responsible for the case referred to him
or her. The Hearing Officer has no other
responsibility, direct or supervisory, for
the investigation of cases referred for the
assessment of civil penalties.
(c) The Hearing Officer decides each
case on the basis of the information
before him or her, and must have no
prior connection with the case.
§ 599.510 Initiation of action before the
Hearing Officer.
(a) After the Hearing Officer receives
a case file from the Chief Counsel, the
Hearing Officer notifies the party in
writing of:
(1) The date, time and location of the
hearing and whether the hearing will be
conducted telephonically or at the DOT
Headquarters building in Washington,
D.C.;
(2) The right to be represented at all
stages of the proceeding by counsel as
set forth in § 599.511; and,
(3) The right to a free copy of all
written evidence in the case file as set
forth in § 599.507.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(b) On the request of a party, or at the
Hearing Officer’s direction, multiple
proceedings may be consolidated if at
any time it appears that such
consolidation is necessary or desirable.
§ 599.511
Counsel.
A party has the right to be represented
at all stages of the proceeding by
counsel. A party electing to be
represented by counsel must notify the
Hearing Officer of this election in
writing, after which point the Hearing
Officer will direct all further
communications to that counsel. A
party represented by counsel bears all of
its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
§ 599.512
Hearing location and costs.
(a) Unless the party requests a hearing
at which the party appears before the
Hearing Officer in Washington, DC, the
hearing shall be held telephonically.
The hearing is held at the headquarters
of the U.S. Department of
Transportation in Washington, DC.
(b) The Hearing Officer may transfer
a case to another Hearing Officer at a
party’s request or at the Hearing
Officer’s direction.
(c) A party is responsible for all fees
and costs (including attorneys’ fees and
costs, and costs that may be associated
with travel or accommodations)
associated with attending a hearing.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 599.513
Hearing procedures.
(a) There is no right to discovery in
any proceedings conducted pursuant to
this subpart.
(b) The material in the case file
pertinent to the issues to be determined
by the Hearing Officer is presented by
the Chief Counsel or his or her designee.
(c) The Chief Counsel may
supplement the case file with
information prior to the hearing. A copy
of such information will be provided to
the party no later than 3 days before the
hearing.
(d) At the close of the Chief Counsel’s
presentation of evidence, the party has
the right to examine, respond to and
rebut material in the case file and other
information presented by the Chief
Counsel.
(e) In receiving evidence, the Hearing
Officer is not bound by strict rules of
evidence. In evaluating the evidence
presented, the Hearing Officer must give
due consideration to the reliability and
relevance of each item of evidence.
(f) A party may present the testimony
of any witness either through a written
statement or a personal appearance. If a
party wishes to present testimony
through a personal appearance, the
party is responsible for obtaining that
personal appearance, including any
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
costs associated with such appearance.
The Hearing Officer may, at his or her
discretion, accept a stipulation in lieu of
testimony.
(g) At the close of the party’s
presentation of evidence, the Hearing
Officer may allow the introduction of
rebuttal evidence that may be presented
by the Chief Counsel. The Hearing
Officer may allow the party to respond
to any such evidence submitted.
(h) The Hearing Officer may take
notice of matters which are subject to a
high degree of indisputability and are
commonly known in the community or
are ascertainable from readily available
sources of known accuracy. Prior to
taking notice of a matter, the Hearing
Officer shall give the party an
opportunity to show why notice should
not be taken. In any case in which
notice is taken, the Hearing Officer
places a written statement of the matters
as to which notice was taken in the
record, with the basis for such notice,
including a statement that the party
consented to notice being taken or a
summary of the party’s objections.
(i) After the evidence in the case has
been presented, the Chief Counsel and
the party may present argument on the
issues in the case. The party may also
request an opportunity to submit a
written statement for consideration by
the Hearing Officer and for further
review. If granted, the Hearing Officer
shall allow a reasonable time for
submission of the statement and shall
specify the date by which it must be
received. If the statement is not received
within the time prescribed, or within
the limits of any extension of time
granted by the Hearing Officer, the
Hearing Officer prepares the decision in
the case.
(j) A verbatim transcript of the hearing
will not normally be prepared. A party
may, solely at its own expense, cause a
verbatim transcript to be made. If a
verbatim transcript is made, the party
shall submit two copies to the Hearing
Officer not later than 15 days of the
hearing. The Hearing Officer shall
include such transcript in the record.
§ 599.514
Assessment of civil penalties.
(a) Not later than 30 days following
the close of the hearing, the Hearing
Officer shall issue a written decision on
the Notice of Violation, based on the
hearing record. The decision shall set
forth the basis for the Hearing Officer’s
assessment of a civil penalty, or
decision not to assess a civil penalty. In
determining the amount of the civil
penalty, the severity of the violation and
the intent and history of the party
committing the violation shall be taken
into account. The assessment of a civil
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
37905
penalty by the Hearing Officer shall be
set forth in an accompanying final
order.
(b) If the Hearing Officer assesses civil
penalties in excess of $100,000.00, the
Hearing Officer’s decision contains a
statement advising the party of the right
to an administrative appeal to the
Administrator. The party is advised that
failure to submit an appeal within the
prescribed time will bar its
consideration and that failure to appeal
on the basis of a particular issue will
constitute a waiver of that issue in its
appeal before the Administrator.
(c) The filing of a timely and complete
appeal to the Administrator of a Hearing
Officer’s order assessing a civil penalty
shall suspend the operation of the
Hearing Officer’s penalty.
(d) There shall be no administrative
appeals of civil penalties of $100,000.00
or less.
§ 599.515 Appeals of civil penalties in
excess of $100,000.00.
(a) A party may appeal the Hearing
Officer’s order assessing civil penalties
over $100,000.00 to the Administrator
within 21 days of the date of the
issuance of the Hearing Officer’s order.
(b) The Administrator will affirm the
decision of the Hearing Officer unless
the Administrator finds that the Hearing
Officer’s decision was unsupported by
the record as a whole.
(c) If the Administrator finds that the
decision of the Hearing Officer was
unsupported, in whole or in part, then
the Administrator may:
(1) Assess or modify a civil penalty;
(2) Rescind the Notice of Violation; or
(3) Remand the case back to the
Hearing Officer for new or additional
proceedings.
(d) In the absence of a remand, the
decision of the Administrator in an
appeal is a final agency action.
§ 599.516 Collection of assessed or
compromised civil penalties.
(a) Payment of a civil penalty,
whether assessed or compromised, shall
be made by check, postal money order,
or electronic transfer of funds, as
provided in instructions by the agency.
A payment of civil penalties shall not be
considered a request for a hearing.
(b) The party must remit payment of
any assessed civil penalty to NHTSA
within 30 days after receipt of the
Hearing Officer’s order assessing civil
penalties or, in the case of an appeal to
the Administrator, within 30 days after
receipt of the Administrator’s decision
on the appeal. Failure to make timely
payment may result in the institution of
appropriate action under the Federal
Claims Collection Act, as amended, the
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37906
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
regulations issued thereunder, and other
applicable law.
(c) The party must remit payment of
any compromised civil penalty to
NHTSA on the date and under such
terms and conditions as agreed to by the
party and NHTSA. Failure to pay a
compromised civil penalty to NHTSA
on the date and under such terms and
conditions as agreed to by the party and
NHTSA may either result in the
institution of appropriate action under
the Federal Claims Collection Act, as
amended, the regulations issued
thereunder, and other applicable law, or
NHTSA entering a finding of violation
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
by default and assessing a civil penalty
in the amount proposed in the Notice of
Violation without processing the
violation under the hearing procedures
set forth in this part.
§ 599.517
Other sanctions.
The procedures and penalties
described in this subpart are not the
only procedures and penalties that may
apply to someone who violates the
CARS Act or submits a false
certification required by this rule.
Anyone who submits false information
on these forms or otherwise violates the
CARS Act or this part may not only be
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
subject to the procedures and penalties
described in this subpart, but also civil
and criminal penalties. Such civil and
criminal penalties may include
penalties three times any amount falsely
claimed to be due from the United
States pursuant to the False Claims Act
(31 U.S.C. 3729), or imprisonment of up
to 5 years and fines of up to $250,000
(18 U.S.C. 1001). In addition, NHTSA
may request that the Attorney General
seek appropriate injunctive relief to
address violations of the CARS Act or
this part.
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37907
ER29JY09.001
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
ER29JY09.002
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37908
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37909
ER29JY09.003
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
ER29JY09.004
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37910
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37911
ER29JY09.005
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
ER29JY09.006
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37912
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37913
ER29JY09.007
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
ER29JY09.008
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37914
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37915
ER29JY09.009
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
ER29JY09.010
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37916
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37917
ER29JY09.011
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
ER29JY09.012
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
37918
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
37919
ER29JY09.013
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
37920
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Issued on: July 23, 2009.
Ronald L. Medford,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–17994 Filed 7–24–09; 4:15 pm]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:39 Jul 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29JYR3.SGM
29JYR3
ER29JY09.014
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
BILLING CODE 4910–59–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37878-37920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17994]
[[Page 37877]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part IV
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
49 CFR Parts 512 and 599
Requirements and Procedures for Consumer Assistance To Recycle and Save
Program; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 29, 2009 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 37878]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 512 and 599
[Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0120]
RIN 2127-AK53
Requirements and Procedures for Consumer Assistance To Recycle
and Save Program
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule sets forth requirements and procedures for the
voluntary vehicle trade-in and purchase/lease program under the
Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009. This program helps
consumers pay for a new, more fuel efficient car or truck from a
participating dealer when they trade in a less fuel efficient car or
truck. The rule establishes a process by which dealers can register in
order to participate in the program and establishes the criteria this
agency will use to determine which disposal facilities are eligible to
receive and either crush or shred the trade-in vehicles. It also sets
forth the criteria that trade-in vehicles and new vehicles must meet in
order for purchases and leases to qualify for assistance under this
program and establishes the requirements that must be met by consumers,
dealers, disposal facilities and others. Finally, the rule sets forth
enforcement procedures and provisions for punishing fraud and other
violations of the program requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective July 29, 2009. Petitions: If you
wish to petition for reconsideration of this rule, your petition must
be received by September 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: If you submit a petition for reconsideration of this rule,
you should refer in your petition to the docket number of this document
and submit your petition to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building,
Washington, DC 20590.
The petition will be placed in the public docket. Anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all documents received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the document (or
signing the document, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the complete User Notice
and Privacy Notice for Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/search/footer/privacyanduse.jsp.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may obtain additional information
about the CARS program by calling the CARS Hotline at 1-866-CAR-7891.
It is dedicated to calls about the program. For non-legal issues, you
may call, Mr. Frank Borris, NHTSA Office of Enforcement, telephone
(202) 366-8089. For legal issues, you may call David Bonelli, NHTSA
Office of Chief Counsel, telephone (202) 366-5834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Questions and Comments From the Public About the CARS Program
III. Public Outreach and Consultation
IV. The Regulation
a. Definitions (Sec. 599.102)
b. Registration of Dealers (Sec. 599.200)
c. Identification of Disposal Facilities (Sec. 599.201)
d. Determining Eligibility of Trade-in Vehicles and New Vehicles
(Sec. 599.300)
1. Vehicle Definitions
2. Eligibility of Trade-in Vehicles
3. Eligibility of New Vehicles
e. Requirements for Qualifying Transactions (Sec. Sec. 599.300
and 301)
1. Vehicle Categories and Credit Amounts
2. Special Requirements for Trade-in Vehicles
3. Restrictions and Limitations on Transactions
f. Requirements for Dealer Reimbursement (Sec. 599.302-304)
g. Disposal of Trade-In Vehicles (Sec. 599.400-403)
h. Enforcement (Sec. 599.500-517)
1. Prevention of Fraud
2. Civil Penalties and Other Sanctions
V. Confidential Information and Privacy
a. Determinations of the Confidentiality of CARS Data Based on
FOIA Exemptions 4 and 6
b. Approach--Class Determinations vs. Individual Assessments
c. Class Determinations Based on FOIA Exemption 4
d. Data Submitted to NHTSA for the CARS Program
1. Manufacturer Data
2. Dealer Information and Transaction Data
3. Disposal Facility and Destruction Data
e. CARS Data Class Determinations Based on FOIA Exemption 4
1. Manufacturer Assigned Dealer Identification
2. Dealer Bank Name, ABA Routing Number, Bank Account Number
3. CARS Dealer ID and CARS Authorization Codes
f. Class Determination Based on FOIA Exemption 6
VI. Costs and Benefits
VII. Statutory Basis for This Action
VIII. Effective Date
IX. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Background
On June 24, 2009, the President signed into law the Consumer
Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009 (the CARS Act or the Act)
(Pub. L. 111-32). The Act establishes, within the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA or the agency), a temporary
program under which an owner of a motor vehicle meeting statutorily
specified criteria may trade in the vehicle and receive a monetary
credit from the dealer toward the purchase or lease of a new motor
vehicle meeting statutorily specified criteria.
Generally, the trade-in vehicle must have a combined fuel economy,
as determined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), below a
specified value and the new vehicle must have an EPA combined fuel
economy above a higher specified value. (Combined fuel economy is an
EPA calculation representing the weighted average of a vehicle's city
and highway fuel economy as determined according to the method
described in EPA regulations at 40 CFR 600.210-08(c)). The program
covers qualifying transactions that occur between July 1, 2009 and
November 1, 2009, so long as funds appropriated by Congress are not
exhausted. If all of the conditions of eligibility are met and the
dealer provides NHTSA with sufficient documentation relating to the
transaction, NHTSA will make an electronic payment to the dealer equal
to the amount of the credit extended by the dealer to the consumer, not
exceeding the statutorily authorized amount. The dealer must agree to
transfer the trade-in vehicle to a disposal facility that will crush or
shred it so that it will never be returned to the road, although parts
of the vehicle, other than the engine block and drive train (unless the
drive train is sold in separate parts), may be sold.
The CARS Act requires the Secretary of Transportation, acting
through NHTSA, to issue final regulations within 30 days after
enactment (i.e., by July 24, 2009), ``notwithstanding'' the notice and
comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553). The regulations must, among other things: (1) Provide for a means
of registering dealers for participation in the program; (2) establish
procedures for reimbursement of dealers participating in the program;
(3) require that dealers use the credit in addition to any other rebate
or discount advertised by the dealer or offered by the manufacturer and
prohibit the dealer from using the credit to offset any such other
rebate or
[[Page 37879]]
discount; (4) require that dealers disclose to the person trading in an
eligible vehicle the best estimate of the scrappage value of such
vehicle and permit dealers to retain $50 of the amount paid for the
scrappage value as payment for any administrative costs of
participation in the program; (5) establish requirements and procedures
for the disposal of eligible trade-in vehicles; and (6) provide for the
enforcement of penalties for violations of the program requirements.
Separate from the rulemaking requirement, the CARS Act directs the
agency to establish a Web site to convey information about the program,
including instructions on how to determine if a vehicle is an eligible
trade-in vehicle, how to participate in the program and how to
determine if a dealer is participating in the program. The agency
established this Web site at https://www.cars.gov. Among other things,
the Web site contains an interactive tool for determining eligible
vehicles, a list of participating dealers and disposal facilities,
responses to frequently asked questions, and information on how to
determine the EPA combined fuel economy of trade-in vehicles and of new
vehicles. In addition, NHTSA set up a hotline ((866) 227-7891) to
answer questions about the program and, on July 2, 2009, published a
document in the Federal Register (74 FR 31812) providing additional
useful information, in advance of issuance of this final rule.
The Act provides that the program covers eligible transactions
beginning on July 1, 2009, prior to today's final rule. NHTSA advised
the public through the July 2 Federal Register document, the Web site,
and the hotline that it was prudent to wait until the details of the
program were specified in today's final rule. Nevertheless, if
transactions occurring on or after July 1, 2009, but before today's
final rule, meet all of the requirements identified in this final rule,
registered dealers may follow the application procedures of the rule
and apply for reimbursement for those transactions. To expedite
processing, the rule relies, wherever possible, on electronic
submissions through secure agency Web sites.
In order to implement this new program, NHTSA has had to quickly
create a new organization. NHTSA has established the Office of the Car
Allowance Rebate System within the Office of Enforcement. The new
office will consist of three divisions. The Transaction Oversight
Division will work closely with the contractor NHTSA has retained to
review incoming requests for payment from dealers to ensure that those
requests are reviewed correctly and in a timely way. The Data Analysis
and Reporting Division will review data generated in connection with
the program to help ensure the system's efficiency and detect problems
with the process or indications of potential compliance issues. That
division will also produce reports on all aspects of the system. The
Compliance Division will work to detect and deter possible
noncompliance related to the program and coordinate closely with
NHTSA's Office of Chief Counsel when possible violations are found.
That division will also coordinate closely with the DOT's Office of
Inspector General on issues related to possible fraud in connection
with the program.
The agency also has decided to use the name Car Allowance Rebate
System (CARS) for its program implementing the Act. The use of the term
``rebate'' in the name NHTSA has chosen for the program is not intended
to have any effect on how CARS transactions are treated under State or
Federal tax laws. The CARS Act provides that the credit is not income
to the purchaser, but does not address any other possible tax issues.
NHTSA lacks expertise and authority in tax matters and makes no attempt
here to provide any guidance on those matters.
II. Questions and Comments From the Public About the CARS Program
During the period between enactment of the CARS Act and publication
of today's rule, the agency received numerous questions and comments
about various provisions of the Act. The final rule seeks to address
these comments and questions, and details appear later in this
document. However, the agency provides here a brief summary discussion
of some of the issues raised. As noted earlier, NHTSA's Web site for
the CARS program contains responses to frequently asked questions by
members of the public.
The CARS program assists consumers who trade in their older, less
fuel efficient vehicles for new, more fuel efficient vehicles. The
program is designed to remove these older, less fuel efficient vehicles
from the road, by requiring the trade-in vehicle to be crushed or
shredded. Some consumers were unaware that their trade-in vehicle must
be destroyed as a statutory condition of participating in this program.
Because of that condition, consumers purchasing or leasing a new
vehicle under this program should not expect to receive the full trade-
in value of their old vehicle when negotiating with a dealer.
As detailed below, the program has different requirements for
different types of trade-in vehicles (e.g., passenger cars, SUVs and
vans, pickups, and trucks) because these vehicles have varying levels
of EPA combined fuel economy. In general, passenger cars have the
highest combined fuel economy. Therefore, even though a passenger car
may be quite old and/or in poor condition, it may not be an eligible
trade-in vehicle under the program because its combined fuel economy at
the time of its manufacture (as measured by the EPA) exceeds statutory
limits. Some consumers have expressed surprise at this result. However,
the agency must follow the requirements of the statute. Larger, older
pickups and SUVs, on the other hand, do not typically have very high
fuel economy. The statutory requirements for trading in these vehicles
are less strict than for trading in passenger cars. Consumers may find
that more of the vehicles in these categories are eligible as trade-in
vehicles under the program.
Questions have arisen as to which persons are eligible to
participate in the program and whether a person can trade in a vehicle
owned by someone else, such as a family member. The agency has
concluded that individuals as well as legal entities, such as
corporations and partnerships, may participate in the program. However,
a person may not trade in a vehicle owned by someone else under the
program. The Act's one-year insurance requirement is satisfied so long
as the trade-in vehicle is insured, irrespective of the identity of the
person holding the insurance policy. The specifics of these
requirements are explained later in this document.
The agency has received questions regarding the value and
disposition of the trade-in vehicle. The CARS Act specifies that while
many parts of the trade-in vehicle are permitted to be removed and
sold, in the end the residual vehicle, including the engine block, must
be crushed or shredded. Therefore, the trade-in value of the vehicle is
not likely to exceed its scrap value. Purchasers should not expect to
receive the same trade-in value as they might if the vehicle were to
remain on the road. The Act also requires dealers to disclose to
purchasers the scrap value of the trade-in vehicle at the time of the
trade-in and allows dealers to retain up to $50 of the scrap value of
the vehicle for their administrative costs of participation in the
program.
Some consumers have expressed concern that the combined fuel
economy value of their vehicles, as determined on the https://
fueleconomy.gov Web site of the EPA, is
[[Page 37880]]
not an accurate measure of the actual fuel economy they experience. EPA
determines these values for each make, model, and model year with
regard to each vehicle at the time of its manufacture. These consumers
contend that if another means were used to calculate combined fuel
economy, their vehicle would be an eligible trade-in vehicle under the
program. The CARS Act is prescriptive in this regard, and requires
NHTSA to use the EPA calculation, and not any other calculation, to
determine whether a trade-in vehicle is eligible under the program.
Some consumers have asked whether they may participate in more than
one reimbursed transaction, either singly or as joint-registered owners
of a vehicle. The CARS Act specifies that each person may receive only
one credit and that only one credit may be issued to the joint-
registered owners of a single trade-in vehicle under the program.
Consequently, a person may participate in a transaction that receives a
credit under this program only once.
The CARS Act is specific as to the characteristics of the vehicle
that may be traded in and the characteristics of the new vehicle that
may be purchased or leased, and these two requirements are
interdependent (i.e., whether a new vehicle is eligible under the
program depends, in part, on the characteristics of the trade-in
vehicle). For example, the trade-in requirements for a large work truck
differ from those of passenger cars under the program. Similarly, some
vehicles--notably motorcycles--simply are not eligible under the CARS
Act, either as trade-in vehicles or for purchase or lease, even though
consumers have noted that transactions involving those vehicles might
reduce fuel use and improve the environment.
III. Public Outreach and Consultation
The extremely short time afforded by the Act to develop and
complete this rulemaking precluded publishing a proposed rule for
notice and comment. Therefore, the agency took a variety of steps to
obtain public input as it moved forward to develop this rule. It
established a Web site that invited public inquiries. As it received
inquiries, it posted a steadily growing list of questions and answers,
which in turn led to additional inquiries. It hosted a ``webinar'' that
elicited hundreds of inquiries. In addition, it met with
representatives of a wide variety of environmental interest groups.
The agency also directly consulted with organizations representing
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), including the Alliance of
Automobile Manufacturers and the Association of International
Automobile Manufacturers, to obtain information on franchised
dealerships. The agency involved the OEMs because they possess
comprehensive and readily available lists of new vehicle dealers
licensed under State law. As detailed below, the agency is using lists
of franchised dealers provided by the OEMs to aid in the process of
registering dealers under the program.
NHTSA met with automobile dealers and dealer organizations,
including the National Automobile Dealers Association and the American
International Automobile Dealers Association, to better understand the
typical vehicle trade-in and purchase/lease transaction. The agency
consulted with groups representing disposal facilities, salvage
auctions, and reporting entities, including the American Salvage Pool
Association, the Automotive Recyclers Association, CoPart, Mannheim,
Insurance Auto Auctions, the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries,
Inc., and the National Salvage Vehicle Reporting Program, to learn
about the processes involved in recycling and scrapping old vehicles.
The information learned by the agency from dealer and disposal facility
organizations was critical to an informed rulemaking process.
The agency also consulted with officials from Texas, California and
Germany. These officials provided valuable information to the agency,
based on their experience administering and enforcing similar vehicle
purchase and trade-in programs. Each of these officials cautioned NHTSA
that it would need to be vigilant to guard against fraud.
Finally, as required under the CARS Act, the agency coordinated
with appropriate Federal agencies. With respect to the National Motor
Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS), the agency met with the
Department of Justice and its NMVTIS program administrator, the
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, to develop
procedures for updating the NMVTIS to reflect the crushing or shredding
of trade-in vehicles under the program. The agency consulted with the
EPA on the listing of categories of eligible vehicles and on the
listing of disposal facilities and requirements and procedures for the
proper disposal of refrigerants, antifreeze, mercury switches, and
other substances prior to crushing or shredding the trade-in vehicle.
The agency also consulted with EPA concerning a method to disable the
engines of the vehicles that are traded in.
Memoranda providing the dates and summaries of meetings with these
organizations and various other groups are included in the docket for
this rule.
IV. The Regulation
As directed by the CARS Act, today's final rule sets forth
requirements and procedures for registering participating dealers and
listing participating disposal facilities, reimbursing dealers for
qualifying transactions, disposing of trade-in vehicles, and enforcing
penalties for program violations.
The rule is being issued without first providing a notice and an
opportunity for public comment. As noted above, the Act provides that
the rule shall be issued within 30 days after enactment,
``notwithstanding'' the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553, the Federal law
requiring notice and comment. Further, given that schedule and the
necessity of quickly beginning to implement this 4-month program with a
statutorily fixed end date, the agency finds for good cause that
providing notice and comment is impracticable and contrary to the
public interest. Drafting and issuing a proposed rule, providing a
period for public comment, and addressing those comments in the final
rule would have been highly impracticable in the time available and
would have substantially delayed issuance of this final rule beyond the
legislatively mandated issuance date of July 24. We think the public
interest is best served by issuing this rule on the mandated date so
that its requirements are known and can be followed by all
participants. This is especially true because transactions since July 1
have been potentially eligible for credits under this program.
The CARS Act prescribes a rulemaking period of just 30 days before
the program is to be fully implemented and capable of accommodating a
potentially very large number of transactions. Mindful of this
requirement, the agency placed significant emphasis on efficient
transaction processes and data exchange. To that end, most of the
transactional requirements imposed by today's rule are met through
electronic online submissions. Where this is so, the rule identifies
the particular data or information required in the electronic
submission and, in one case, refers to an appendix with a facsimile of
the electronic form for easy reference.
The Act requires the agency to develop certain lists to assist
consumers and dealers (e.g., a comprehensive list of new fuel efficient
vehicles meeting the program requirements, a list of disposal
[[Page 37881]]
entities to which dealers may transfer eligible trade-in vehicles).
Here, the rule makes use of references to the CARS Web site for
convenient reference to these helpful lists.
Much of the CARS Act is specific and directive. However, where a
statutory term or provision is not clear or gives the agency
discretion, the rule generally strikes the balance in favor of an
interpretation that promotes smooth and expeditious completion of
transactions or one that decreases opportunities for fraud.
a. Definitions (Sec. 599.102)
The CARS Act defines a dealer as a person licensed by a ``State''
and identifies an eligible trade-in vehicle in terms of its insurance
and registration status under ``State'' law. Read together, these
statutory provisions restrict the transactions that are eligible for a
credit under the CARS program. More specifically, a dealer must be a
United States dealer and a trade-in vehicle must be insured and
registered in the United States. However, nothing in the Act excludes
U.S. territories from the reach of the program. Consequently, in
section 599.102, the agency has defined ``State'' to include the 50
United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin
Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands.
The CARS Act uses the term ``person'' to describe those eligible to
purchase or lease a new vehicle under the Program. See Sections 1302(c-
d). In the absence of a definition of this term in the CARS Act, the
agency relies on the universal definition that appears in 1 U.S.C. 1,
which includes corporations, companies, associations, firms,
partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as
individuals. The agency adopts this definition for the term ``person''
in Section 599.102, and also defines a ``purchaser'' in that section as
a person purchasing or leasing a new vehicle under the CARS program. Of
course, each person is subject to the statutory restriction that
precludes participation by any person in this program more than once.
b. Registration of Dealers (Sec. 599.200)
The Act requires the agency to provide for a means of registering
dealers for participation in the program. (Section 1302(d)(1)). A
dealer is defined under the Act as a person licensed by a State who
engages in the sale of new automobiles to ultimate purchasers (Section
1302(i)(6)), a definition we have restated in Section 599.102. After
consultation with dealer and OEM organizations, the agency is
implementing the dealer registration requirement through a several step
process. First, on June 30, 2009, the agency requested and later
received a list of franchised dealers from their respective OEMs,
including each dealer's legal business name, doing-business-as name,
mailing address, point of contact, and OEM franchise identifier.\1\ OEM
franchised dealers, as a group, satisfy the requirement for State
licensing. The agency has learned that, without an active OEM franchise
agreement, a dealer is unable to offer manufacturer purchasing
incentives and may not be able, in some cases, to extend the full
manufacturer warranty to the new vehicles it sells. For this reason,
the agency includes the requirement for a currently active OEM
franchise agreement as part of the dealer registration process. (The
OEMs have agreed to update this list weekly, to add newly franchised
dealerships and remove dealerships that are no longer under franchise
agreement.) The agency then contacted all listed dealers by mail,
providing instructions on how to register under the program. Dealers
received separate letters and were instructed to register separately
for each make of vehicle they sell. Section 599.200(b) identifies the
required dealer qualifications for registration, which flow from the
statutory requirement for State licensing and from the need to perform
transactions electronically. OEM franchised dealers should easily
satisfy these requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The agency chose to involve the OEMs in this process to
eliminate the opportunity for unscrupulous individuals or entities
to identify themselves as franchised dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As set forth in section 599.200(c), dealers that have been
contacted by mail by the agency and that wish to participate must
register to do so electronically, using the authorization code and
following the instructions provided in the mailing, and fill out an
electronic screen providing, among other things, name and contact
information and bank account and routing data for receiving payment
under the program.\2\ The agency will review this information to ensure
completeness, and verify that the dealer has a still active franchise
agreement (based on the continuously updated list provided by OEMs).
Section 599.200(d) sets forth the procedures for approving and
disapproving registration applications. Section 599.200(d)(1) provides
that, where an application for registration is approved, the agency
will notify the dealer of approval by e-mail, providing a user
identification and password with which to conduct transactions, and add
the dealer to the list of registered dealers on its Web site at https://www.cars.gov. Consumers may consult this list to identify registered
dealers in their locality. Section 599.200(d)(2) provides that, where
an application for registration is rejected, the agency will notify the
dealer by e-mail, and provide the reasons for rejection. The agency
anticipates that, unless rejected, confirmation of registration and
addition to the list should occur within 2 to 4 business days after a
dealer submits the required information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The registration process was made available to dealers
beginning on July 24, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 599.200(e)(1) provides that the agency may automatically
revoke a registration as a matter of course for termination or
discontinuance of a franchise but the dealer's registration may be
reinstated upon a dealer's showing of proper and adequate license to
sell new vehicles to ultimate purchasers. Section 599.200(e)(2) states
that the agency may suspend or revoke a dealer's registration under the
procedures in Section 599.504. Section 599.200(f) requires a registered
dealer to immediately notify the agency of any change in the
registration information it submitted or any change in the status of
its State license or franchise. Finally, section 599.200(g)
accommodates transactions that occurred after July 1, 2009, but prior
to the publication of today's final rule, by permitting registration
after a qualifying sale or lease transaction has occurred.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As discussed later in this document, other requirements
apply to these earlier transactions as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agency believes that this process is the most efficient and
appropriate method to register dealers consistent with the requirements
of the CARS Act. The Act requires that a dealer be licensed under State
law, and the list provided by OEMs ensures that this is so. Using this
list also allows the agency to verify dealer registration information
in a timely manner. Since the OEMs have agreed to provide weekly
updated lists, this process also will allow for registration of newly
franchised dealers as they come into existence and the discontinuance
of registrations for dealers that are no longer franchised. Newly
franchised dealers will be contacted by mail with an authorization
code, as the agency becomes aware of them from the weekly updated
lists. A dealer whose franchise has been discontinued will be removed
from the agency's list, and will no longer be eligible to receive
credits for transactions under the program.
[[Page 37882]]
c. Identification of Disposal Facilities (Sec. 599.201)
Under the Act, the agency is required to provide a list of entities
to which dealers may transfer eligible trade-in vehicles for disposal.
(Section 1302(d)(5)). The Act also requires the Secretary to coordinate
with the Attorney General to ensure that the National Motor Vehicle
Title Information System (NMVTIS) is timely updated to reflect the
crushing or shredding of trade-in vehicles and appropriate
reclassification of their titles. (Section 1302(c)(2)(C)).
The agency met with groups representing auto recyclers and other
disposal facilities and salvage auctions, as well as officials from
AAMVA and the Department of Justice responsible for administering the
NMVTIS, to get an understanding of the vehicle salvage and disposal
process. From those meetings, the agency learned that there is a wide
range of entities involved in various aspects of the vehicle salvage
and disposal business. The agency also consulted with the EPA about the
CARS program and the requirement to produce a list of disposal
facilities for disposition of the trade-in vehicles. Mindful of
environmental issues, NHTSA sought to identify a universe of disposal
facilities that was attentive to these concerns, while achieving the
objectives of the CARS program.
In the course of these consultations and based on advice from EPA,
the agency identified the National Vehicle Mercury Switch Recovery
Program (NVMSRP) as a comprehensive source of disposal facilities
generally committed to meeting State and Federal environmental laws.
The NVMSRP was established in 2006 under a memorandum of understanding
(MOU) among the EPA, environmental groups, manufacturers and disposal
facilities, to recover and recycle mercury switches from end-of-life
vehicles before they are scrapped, crushed or shredded. This purpose is
in alignment with the CARS Act's requirement for proper vehicle
disposition, including the removal of mercury switches. The MOU
authorizes the End of Life Vehicle Solutions (ELVS), a corporation
established by vehicle manufacturers to carry out responsibilities of
the NVMSRP, including establishing a process for participants to enroll
in the program and maintaining a database of participants who recover
and submit mercury switches.
Participants may enroll in the program by registering with ELVS.
Information about ELVS can be found on its Web site at https://www.elvsolutions.org. Currently, approximately 7,700 disposal
facilities are participants, and EPA estimates that approximately 1,500
of these facilities actively turn in the switches. The agency has
determined that disposal facilities that are participants on the ELVS
list present the best assurance of compliance with State and Federal
environmental laws.
With this in mind, NHTSA has identified disposal facilities that
are ELVS participants for listing as approved disposal facilities under
this program, and these disposal facilities are listed on the agency's
Web site at https://www.cars.gov/disposal. However, some entities on
this list may dispose of mercury switches as part of their business
(for example, auto repair businesses) but do not actually engage in
dismantling or recycling of vehicles. Therefore, the fact that a
facility is on the list does not automatically ensure that it is
equipped to dispose of vehicles properly. To be eligible for
participation in the CARS Program, a facility on the ELVS list must be
able to crush or shred motor vehicles, either with its own equipment or
by use of a mobile crusher. NHTSA was not able to obtain accurate lists
of all entities that have this capacity within the time allowed, but is
informed that many of the entities on the ELVS list are capable of at
least obtaining the services of a mobile crusher. Dealers will have to
inquire of specific entities concerning their capacity to crush or
shred the vehicle. Any facility that does participate will have to
certify that it has that capacity to crush or shred and will dispose of
the vehicle through crushing or shredding.
These facilities must additionally agree to turn in mercury
switches in accordance with the NVMSRP from any CARS trade-in vehicles
they accept (to the extent the vehicles have such switches), by
certifying that they will do so. In addition, because the CARS Act
directs the agency to ensure that pollutants are removed from vehicles
and properly disposed of, that vehicles are crushed or shredded, and
that NMVITS is updated to reflect the disposition of the vehicle, as a
condition of participation in the program, the listed participants must
also agree to remove pollutants from the CARS trade-in vehicles in
compliance with State and Federal law, crush or shred the vehicle,
update NMVTIS to reflect the disposition of the vehicle, and certify to
having done so. The certification requires the disposal facility to
certify that it will dispose of refrigerants, antifreeze, lead
products, mercury switches, and other toxic or hazardous vehicle
components prior to crushing or shredding, in accordance with
applicable Federal and State requirements. The rule does not impose
additional requirements; for example, it does not require removal of
all lead products such as lead solder connections that are ordinarily
not removed during the shredding process.
NHTSA is aware, from consultations with EPA, that the State of
Maine and the U.S. territories are not participants in the NVMSRP and
that the ELVS list contains no disposal facilities in these areas.
Maine has its own program for recycling mercury switches, which is
comparable to the NVMSRP. Under Maine law, a vehicle may not be crushed
without first removing and properly disposing of mercury switches, and
disposal facilities are covered by that law. NHTSA obtained a list of
disposal facilities in Maine from the State Bureau of Motor Vehicles,
and these facilities are included along with the ELVS facilities from
other states, on the agency's Web site at https://www.cars.gov/disposal.
As a condition of participating, these Maine facilities must make the
same certifications as required of the ELVS facilities.
In the case of the U. S. Territories, the agency is informed that
participation in ELVS is currently impracticable for cost reasons
related to sending mercury switches to the Continental United States.
Therefore, the rule does not include disposal facilities on the list
for the Territories, but allows dealers to select disposal facilities
within the territories that are able to make the same certifications
required of the ELVS and Maine facilities.
The agency plans to update this disposal facility list
periodically, to add entities that become ELVS participants and to
remove entities that are no longer ELVS participants or for other
reasons discussed elsewhere in this document. The rule requires dealers
to consult this list on the CARS Web site at the time of the transfer
of the trade-in vehicle, as an entity that does not appear on the list
on that date is not eligible to receive the vehicle for crushing or
shredding.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Participants in the CARS program are cautioned to consult
the list on NHTSA's CARS Web site, https://www.cars.gov/disposal, for
eligible disposal facilities, not the list on the ELVS Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One issue that has arisen is the participation of entities that
shred vehicles in the CARS process. Shredders turn crushed vehicles
into materials useful in various industrial processes. Shredders are
relatively few in number, with less than 300 shredding machines
distributed nationwide. Disposal facilities with shredders may be ELVS
participants and, if they are, they can
[[Page 37883]]
participate fully in the CARS program. To the extent these facilities
are not ELVS participants, they may still play a role in the ultimate
disposition of the vehicle. The final rule places no restrictions on a
trade-in vehicle once it is crushed. Once crushed, the agency assumes
the vehicle will be transferred to a shredder so that its materials can
be recycled. The rule does not require any tracking of this ultimate
shredding of a crushed vehicle, so the entity receiving the crushed
vehicle for shredding does not have to submit a CARS certification
form.
Because of the requirement, discussed later in this document, that
dealers must disable the trade-in vehicle's engine prior to
transferring the vehicle to a disposal facility, the agency believes
that the statutory interest in ensuring that the vehicle is not
returned to use on the road in this or any other country is largely met
before it leaves the dealer's possession. Prior engine disablement
reduces the likelihood that a trade-in vehicle will be returned to use
as an on-road automobile. With the extra assurance provided by engine
disablement, the smooth operation of the program is better served if
limitations on participation in the disposal stream are kept to a
minimum, ensuring a reasonable geographic distribution of entities that
may receive trade-in vehicles from dealers under the program.
With these points in mind, the agency consulted with
representatives of the salvage auction industry. The agency believes it
is practicable to provide for the participation of salvage auctions in
the transfer of trade-in vehicles to disposal facilities under the CARS
program, in order to broaden the avenues of disposal available to
dealers. Therefore, salvage auctions may receive a CARS trade-in
vehicle, provided that, as a condition of participation, these entities
agree to limit their auction sales of CARS trade-in vehicles to the
disposal facilities described above that appear on the agency's list.
We believe that including listed disposal facilities, and requiring
salvage auctions to sell at auction the scrap trade-in vehicles only to
approved disposal facilities strikes the appropriate balance between
program and environmental accountability, on the one hand, and
geographic distribution and dealer access, on the other.
NHTSA was unable to develop a comprehensive list of salvage
auctions within the time allowed. Although we heard from
representatives of some of the largest auctions and their associations
(including CoPart, Mannheim, the Insurance Auto Auctions, and the
Automotive Salvage Pool Association), we concluded that simply listing
their members, absent more information, would not be appropriate.
However, we understand from representatives of those organizations and
companies that they and their members are willing to restrict the sale
of CARS trade-in vehicles to just those entities on the CARS program
disposal facility list and make the necessary certifications about the
disposal of those vehicles. Any other salvage auctions willing to abide
by these restrictions and submit the necessary forms and certifications
under penalty of law may participate in the CARS program. All
participants must understand the specific requirements of this rule and
the substantial penalties they may incur if they violate it or submit
false information in connection with the program. Also, all who
participate must understand that their records, premises, and CARS
vehicles in their possession are subject to inspection by NHTSA and the
DOT Office of Inspector General.
Section 599.201 implements the requirements for identification of
salvage auctions and disposal facilities. Section 599.201(a) identifies
the participating entities, including salvage auctions, disposal
facilities listed on the agency's Web site, and disposal facilities in
the U.S. territories. Section 599.201(b) describes the conditions these
entities must follow in order to participate in the program.
d. Determining Eligibility of Trade-in Vehicles and New Vehicles (Sec.
599.300)
The CARS Act prescribes detailed requirements concerning eligible
trade-in vehicles and eligible new vehicles for qualifying transactions
under the Program. This final rule implements these requirements in
close adherence to the statutory language.
1. Vehicle Definitions
The CARS Act divides eligible trade-in vehicles and new vehicles
into four groups: passenger automobiles, category 1 trucks, category 2
trucks, and category 3 trucks.\5\ The term ``passenger automobile'' and
its definition are taken from the agency's fuel economy statute. The
definition excludes vehicles that NHTSA has determined are (1) not
manufactured primarily for transporting persons and (2) vehicles that
are capable of off-highway operation. Vehicles not manufactured
primarily for transporting persons include pickup trucks and certain
vehicles that permit expanded use of the vehicle for cargo-carrying
purposes, including vehicles which are designed to transport more than
10 persons; provide temporary living quarters, transport property on an
open bed, provide greater cargo-carrying than passenger-carrying
volume, or permit expanded use of the automobile for cargo-carrying
purposes or other nonpassenger-carrying purposes. (See 49 CFR
523.5(a)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Section 1302(i) of the CARS Act defines those categories
largely with reference to statutory categories of vehicles subject
to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards as follows:
``passenger automobile'' means a passenger automobile, as defined in
section 32901(a)(18) of title 49, United States Code, that has a
combined fuel economy value of at least 22 miles per gallon;
``category 1 truck'' means a non-passenger automobile, as defined in
section 32901(a)(17) of title 49, United States Code, that has a
combined fuel economy value of at least 18 miles per gallon, except
that such term does not include a category 2 truck; ``category 2
truck'' means a large van or a large pickup, as categorized by the
Secretary using the method used by the Environmental Protection
Agency and described in the report entitled ``Light-Duty Automotive
Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2008''; ``category
3 truck'' means a work truck, as defined in section 32901(a)(19) of
title 49, United States Code. Under regulations implementing the
CAFE program (see 49 CFR Part 523), ``passenger automobiles''
currently include all passenger cars and ``non-passenger
automobiles'' include all SUVs, vans and pickup trucks up to 8,500
pounds GVWR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vehicles that are capable of off-highway operation include three
groups of vehicles. (See 49 CFR 523.5(b)). The first includes vehicles
that have 4-wheel drive and have at least four out of five specified
physical characteristics relating to ground clearance.\6\ The second
includes vehicles that are rated at more than 6,000 pounds gross
vehicle weight and have at least four out of five specified physical
characteristics relating to ground clearance, but do not have 4-wheel
drive. The third includes 2-wheel drive SUVs (regardless of GVWR) which
came in a 4-wheel drive version that met four of five specified
physical characteristics related to ground clearance. Beginning with
the 2011 model year, NHTSA will reclassify this third group of vehicles
as passenger cars. See Average Fuel Economy Standards--Passenger Cars
and Light Trucks--Model Year 2011, Section XI (Vehicle Classification);
74 FR 14419, March 30, 2009. Although neither specified nor prohibited
in the CARS Act, the agency has concluded that it is most appropriate
to define passenger
[[Page 37884]]
cars using the NHTSA regulations and policy which are applicable to
2010 and earlier model year vehicles. Therefore, the third group of
vehicles will continue to be classified as trucks for CARS purposes
(and will be excluded from the definition of a passenger automobile).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The five ground clearance characteristics are: (1) An
approach angle of not less than 28 degrees; (2) a breakover angle of
not less than 14 degrees; (3) a departure angle of not less than 20
degrees; (4) a running clearance of not less than 20 centimeters;
and (5) front and rear axle clearances of not less than 18
centimeters each. These characteristics are calculated when the
automobile is at curb weight, on a level surface, with the front
wheels parallel to the automobile's longitudinal centerline, and the
tires inflated to the manufacturer's recommended pressure. See 49
CFR Part 523.5(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A ``category 1 truck'' is a non-passenger automobile. This category
includes sport utility vehicles (SUVs), medium-duty passenger
vehicles,\7\ small and medium pickup trucks, minivans, and small and
medium passenger and cargo vans. It does not include vehicles that are
defined as category 2 trucks.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Medium-duty passenger vehicles are defined in 49 CFR 523.2.
\8\ As noted in footnote 2, the statutory definition of the term
``category 2 truck'' is based on the categorization method used by
the Environmental Protection Agency and described in the report
entitled ``Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends:
1975 through 2008.'' (A copy of this report has been placed in the
docket for this rule.) Based on that method of categorization, large
vans and pickup trucks, which would otherwise fall within category
1, instead fall within category 2. The method is based primarily on
published wheelbase data according to the following criteria: A
small pickup is less than 105'', a midsize pickup is 105'' to 115'',
a large pickup is more than 115''; A small van is less than 109'', a
midsize van is 109'' to 124'', a large van is more than 124''; A
small SUV is less than 100'', a midsize SUV is 100'' to 110'', a
large SUV is more than 110''. This classification scheme is similar
to that used in many trade and consumer publications.
For those vehicle nameplates with a variety of wheelbases, the
size classification was determined by considering only the smallest
wheelbase produced. The classification of a vehicle for this report
is based on the author's engineering judgment and is not a
replacement for definitions used in implementing automotive
standards legislation. [Emphasis added.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A ``category 2 truck'' is a large van or a large pickup truck,
based upon the length of the wheelbase (more than 115 inches for pickup
trucks and more than 124 inches for vans). If the vehicle nameplate
contains a variety of wheelbases, the size classification is determined
by considering only the shortest wheelbase produced. In addition, some
pickup trucks and cargo vans which exceed these thresholds are treated
as category 3 trucks instead of category 2 trucks.
A ``category 3 truck'' is a work truck and is rated between 8,500
and 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. This category includes very
large pickup trucks (those with cargo beds 72 inches or more in length)
and very large cargo vans.
As previously stated, for category 1 and 2 trucks with a variety of
wheelbases, the size classification is determined by considering only
the shortest wheelbase produced. If a secondary manufacturer modifies
and introduces into commerce a vehicle with only a limited portion of
the wheelbases offered by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM),
the size classification for the secondary manufacturer will be
determined by (and consistent with) the size classification determined
for the OEM. For example, if General Motors produces 2008 model year
Chevrolet Colorado pickup trucks with wheelbases of 111, 119 and 126
inches, Colorado pickup trucks would be classified as category 1 trucks
for CARS purposes (because the shortest wheelbase Colorado pickup truck
was less than or equal to 115 inches). If a secondary manufacturer
introduces into commerce 2008 model year Colorado ZZZ vehicles (high
performance Colorado pickups with 126 inch wheelbase only), Colorado
ZZZ models would also be classified as a category 1 pickup trucks.
The rule defines these four groups of vehicles in section 599.102
and makes use of these categories throughout sections 599.300(f) and
599.300(g).
2. Eligibility of Trade-in Vehicles
The CARS Act establishes four criteria for an eligible trade-in
vehicle. The trade-in vehicle must:
(1) Be in drivable condition;
(2) Have been continuously insured, in accordance with State law,
and registered in the same owner's name for the one-year period
immediately prior to the trade-in;
(3) Have been manufactured not earlier than 25 years before the
date of trade-in \9\ and, in the case of a category 3 vehicle, also be
from a model year not later than model year 2001; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ This means that all pre-model year 1984 vehicles, and most
model year 1984 vehicles, are not eligible as trade-in vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Have a combined fuel economy value of 18 miles per gallon or
less,\10\ if it is a passenger automobile, a category 1 truck, or a
category 2 truck.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ As discussed in later in this preamble, under
``Requirements for qualifying transactions,'' the combined fuel
economy of the trade-in vehicle must satisfy the statutory
requirements related to the difference between its fuel economy and
that of the new vehicle, as well as meeting this 18 miles per gallon
absolute threshold.
\11\ There is no minimum for category 3 trucks because they do
not have fuel economy ratings.
The agency must have a means of evaluating these criteria as it
determines whether a transaction qualifies under this program.
(i) ``Drivable Condition''
The agency intends that ``drivable condition'' be demonstrated by
several means. First, it must be confirmed by the trade-in vehicle
being operated, under its own power, by the dealer on public roads on
the date the vehicle is traded in. The dealer must then certify to the
operation of the vehicle when it submits its request for reimbursement.
Separately, the person trading in the vehicle must certify that it is
in drivable condition. This latter certification also must be submitted
by the dealer with its application requesting reimbursement. This
approach is adopted in section 599.300(b)(1) of the final rule, and the
required dealer and purchaser certifications are contained in the
Summary of Sale/Lease and Certifications (Appendix A, certifications
section). Note that the Summary of Sale/Lease and Certifications form
has two components--a section for the dealer to input information
summarizing the terms of the sale or lease transaction and a section
containing certifications that must be made by both the dealer and the
purchaser. The section summarizing the transaction is discussed later
in this notice.
(ii) Insurance
In addressing the requirement that the trade-in vehicle be
``continuously insured consistent with the applicable State law'' for a
period of not less than one year prior to the transaction, the agency
notes the complication that not all States require vehicle owners to
purchase automobile insurance coverage. Several States provide vehicle
owners with the option, for example, to post a surety bond, leave a
cash deposit or self-insure in lieu of purchasing automobile insurance.
Two States have little or no insurance requirements.
The agency recognizes that insurance requirements differ throughout
the country. However, the agency believes that the Act requires the
continuous one-year insurance condition to be met as a threshold
matter, with respect to any trade-in vehicle under the program. In a
State where the conditions and requirements of insurance are specified
in law (e.g., liability minimums, deductible requirements), the
insurance coverage would then need to be in accordance with those
conditions and requirements. To qualify under this requirement, a
purchaser must provide proof of insurance covering the trade-in vehicle
for a period of at least one year prior to the date of the trade-in.
The agency is aware that, in some cases, consumers may have
insurance cards that state clearly the period of insurance coverage,
while in other cases, an insurance card is unavailable or does not
convey the period-of-coverage information. To provide for an
alternative, the agency consulted with several insurance associations,
including the Insurance Information Institute, American Insurance
[[Page 37885]]
Association, National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, and
Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. These entities
agreed to assist the agency through their member insurance companies.
They indicated that purchasers could contact their insurers to obtain
proof of insurance in a form that provides the details needed to
identify the insured vehicle and the one year period of coverage
required under the program.
To implement this process, the agency is requiring the owner of the
trade-in vehicle to provide proof, at the time the vehicle is traded
in, that the trade-in vehicle has been insured continuously for one
year prior to the trade-in. This proof may take one of three forms. The
proof may consist of one or more insurance cards containing the make,
model, model year, and vehicle identification number (VIN) of the
insured vehicle, but only if, taken together, the cards display on
their face a continuous one-year period of insurance coverage. The
proof may also consist of insurance policy documents (e.g.,
declarations pages) showing the same information. Finally, the proof
may consist of a signed letter, on insurance company letterhead,
identifying the same vehicle identification information (i.e., make,
model, model year, and VIN) of the insured vehicle and the period of
continuous coverage, which must be for at least one year prior to the
date of the trade-in. In addition, for each of the three options, the
consumer must certify that the trade-in vehicle has been continuously
insured for the requisite period. This proof of insurance, along with
the consumer certification, must be submitted by the dealer in its
application to the agency requesting reimbursement. Section
599.300(b)(2) and Appendix A, certifications section, implement these
requirements.
(iii) Registration
The requirement that the trade-in vehicle be registered to the same
owner for a continuous period of one year prior to the transaction
requires clarification. The agency interprets this provision as
requiring the trade-in vehicle to be registered to and owned by the
person purchasing or leasing the new vehicle under the program. In a
transaction involving more than one person, the trade-in vehicle must
have been registered to and owned by at least one of the persons
purchasing or leasing the vehicle under the program.
To qualify under this requirement, the purchaser will need to
provide proof of registration covering the trade-in vehicle for a
period of at least one year prior to the date of the trade-in. The
agency recognizes that this proof of registration presents
complications for purchasers. In several States, registration cards or
documents do not indicate a period of coverage of more than one year.
In some of these States, purchasers have a difficult time obtaining
prior registration information from the State. Seeking a less
burdensome alternative, the agency evaluated the capabilities of
commercial vehicle information services, such as Polk and Experian, to
determine the type of vehicle information that is readily available to
consumers. The agency discovered that purchasers may obtain a history
of vehicle registration information from these services.
To implement this process, the agency has determined that proof of
registration may be demonstrated by any of the following: a current
State registration document or series of registration documents in the
name of the purchaser evidencing registration for a period of not less
than one year immediately prior to the trade-in; a current State
registration document showing registration in the name of the purchaser
and a document of title that confers title on the purchaser not less
than one year immediately prior to the trade-in; or a current State
registration document showing registration in the name of the purchaser
and a document from a commercially available vehicle history provider
evidencing registration for a period of not less than one year
immediately prior to the trade-in. Changes in ownership during this
period to delete a co-owner due to death or divorce do not interrupt
the continuity of the registration, so long as the purchaser has been
shown as an owner on the registration for the entire period. In
addition, for each of the three options, the consumer must certify that
the trade-in vehicle was continuously registered for the requisite
period. This proof of registration, along with the consumer
certification, must be submitted by the dealer in its application to
the agency requesting reimbursement. Section 599.300(b)(3) and Appendix
A, certifications section, implements these requirements.
(iv) Manufacture Date
The requirement that the trade-in vehicle be manufactured not
earlier than 25 years before the date of trade-in is straightforward,
and is implemented in section 599.300(b)(4). Ordinarily, the model year
of the vehicle, which appears on the title, will serve to satisfy this
requirement. Where that information is inconclusive (e.g., certain
model year 1984 and 1985 vehicles), the month and year of manufacture
may be retrieved from the safety standard certification label that
appears on the frame or edge of the driver's door in most vehicles. The
rule allows the 25-year period to be satisfied provided it falls any
time within the month that the vehicle is traded in. Section 599.300(f)
implements the additional requirement, in the case of a category 3
vehicle, that the trade-in vehicle be manufactured not later than model
year 2001. The dealer must certify that the trade-in vehicle meets this
manufacturing date requirement. (Appendix A, certifications section).
(v) Combined Fuel Economy
The specified combined fuel economy rating of 18 mpg or less for
the trade-in vehicle (excepting category 3 vehicles) is implemented
throughout sections 599.300(f) and 599.300(g).\12\ Under the Act,
combined fuel economy for an eligible trade-in vehicle is defined as
the number posted under the words ``Estimated New EPA MPG'' and above
the word ``Combined'' for vehicles of model year 1984 through 2007, or
posted under the words ``New EPA MPG'' and above the word ``Combined''
for vehicles of model year 2008 or later on the fueleconomy.gov Web
site of the Environmental Protection Agency for the make, model, and
year of such vehicle. (Section 1302(i)(5)(B)). The agency adopts this
definition in section 599.102, but includes language limiting its
application to combined fuel economy based on gasoline. This treatment
of trade-in vehicles is consistent with the CARS Act requirements for
defining the combined fuel economy of new vehicles.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The trade-in vehicle is also subject to statutory
requirements related to the difference between its combined fuel
economy and that of the new vehicle.
\13\ As described later in this document, the combined fuel
economy of new vehicles is derived from the Monroney label, which
lists only fuel economy based on gasoline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA changed the way it calculated fuel economy ratings starting in
Model Year 2008, and has estimated the revised ratings for Model Years
1985-2007. Therefore, as described above, eligibility is determined by
the revised ratings rather than the original EPA sticker on the
vehicle. Since the revised ratings reflect a lower fuel economy,
vehicles that would not be eligible under their original EPA rating may
qualify for trade-in.
3. Eligibility of New Vehicles
The Act specifies that a new vehicle must be a passenger
automobile, a category 1 truck, a category 2 truck, or
[[Page 37886]]
a category 3 truck. The characteristics of these vehicles were
described earlier under Section c.1, ``Vehicle Definitions,'' and they
are defined in section 599.102. To further assist consumers in
determining the eligibility of new vehicles, the CARS Web site, at
https://www.cars.gov, contains an interactive tool. Consumers may
identify their trade-in vehicle, select a new vehicle, and determine
whether the transaction qualifies for a credit (and the amount of the
credit) under the program.