Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Its Temporary and Permanent Cease and Desist Authority on a Permanent Basis, 36292-36293 [E9-17349]
Download as PDF
36292
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 22, 2009 / Notices
(iii) does not become operative for 30
days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 7 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.8
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally may not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of filing.9 However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) 10 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. ISE
has requested that the Commission
waive the 30-day operative delay. ISE
states that under the proposal, all-ornone orders will be exposed to all
members so that there is a greater
opportunity for market participants to
interact with such orders. The
Commission also notes that the proposal
is on a three-month pilot basis. For
these reasons, the Commission believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, and
designates the proposed rule change to
be operative upon filing with the
Commission.11
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.12
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
7 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
9 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a self-regulatory
organization submit to the Commission written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission deems this
requirement to be met.
10 Id.
11 For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
12 For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
within which the Commission may summarily
abrogate the proposed rule change under Section
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers
the period to commence on July 13, 2009, the date
on which ISE submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
8 17
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:04 Jul 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
[Release No. 34–60306; File No. SR–FINRA–
2009–035]
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2009–51 on the subject
line.
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Its
Temporary and Permanent Cease and
Desist Authority on a Permanent Basis
July 14, 2009.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2009–51. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of ISE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2009–51 and should be
submitted on or before August 12, 2009.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–17351 Filed 7–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
PO 00000
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On May 18, 2009, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’) (f/k/a the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’)) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to adopt its rules
regarding the issuance of issue
temporary and permanent cease and
desist orders on a permanent basis. The
proposal was published for comment in
the Federal Register on June 9, 2009.3
The Commission received no comments
on the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
Since May 2003, pursuant to a pilot
program approved by the Commission 4
and subsequent extensions,5 FINRA has
had the authority to issue temporary
cease and desist orders (‘‘TCDOs’’); 6
impose permanent cease and desist
orders as a remedy in disciplinary cases;
and enforce cease and desist orders.
FINRA proposed to make the existing
pilot program permanent.7
After careful review of the proposal,
the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60028
(June 2, 2009), 74 FR 27364 (June 9, 2009)
(‘‘Notice’’).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47925
(May 23, 2003), 68 FR 33548 (June 4, 2003) (Order
Approving File No. SR–NASD–98–80).
5 The extensions were filed for immediate
effectiveness and were therefore not approved by
the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 51860 (June 16, 2005), 70 FR 36427
(June 23, 2005) (SR–NASD–2005–061); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 55819 (May 25, 2007), 72
FR 30895 (June 4, 2007) (SR–NASD–2007–033); and
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60035 (June 3,
2009), 74 FR 27360 (June 9, 2009) (SR–FINRA–
2009–034).
6 A TCDO is a preliminary order issued in
connection with an underlying disciplinary
proceeding that has been initiated or will be
initiated immediately.
7 The rule filing does not make any substantive
changes to the existing pilot program.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 22, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
a national securities association.8 In
particular, the Commission finds that
the proposal is consistent with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Act,9 which requires,
among other things that FINRA’s rules
be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The
Commission also believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 15A(b)(7) of
the Act,10 which provides that FINRA
members, or persons associated with its
members, must be appropriately
disciplined for violations of any
provisions of the Act or FINRA’s rules.
The Commission believes that making
the pilot program permanent will
provide FINRA with a mechanism to
take action in certain situations against
a member or an associated person that
is alleged to have engaged, or is
engaging, in conduct that violates
Commission, FINRA, or NASD rules,
when such intervention is necessary in
order to prevent likely significant
dissipation or conversion of assets or
other significant harm to investors
before the underlying disciplinary
proceeding can be completed. At the
same time, the Commission believes
that FINRA’s cease and desist
provisions contain sufficient procedural
protections to ensure that respondents
have the opportunity for a fair hearing
and, if applicable, review thereof. When
it first sought cease and desist authority
in 2003, FINRA said that it would use
the authority sparingly and has, in fact,
only used its authority once for a TCDO
and once for a permanent cease and
desist order.11 FINRA stated in its
Notice that if the proposal were adopted
on a permanent basis, it would continue
to use its cease and desist authority
judiciously. The Commission expects
that FINRA will continue to use this
authority in an appropriate manner. The
Commission believes it is reasonable
and consistent with the Act for FINRA
to adopt the cease and desist rules
permanently to enable it to stop persons
from engaging in securities transactions
or conduct affecting the marketplace, in
alleged violation of established rules,
which is likely to cause harm to
8 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
10 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(7).
11 See Notice for a more detailed description of
the matter.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:04 Jul 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
investors or would adversely affect the
public interest if not addressed
expeditiously.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,12 that the
proposed rule change (SR–FINRA–
2009–035), be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–17349 Filed 7–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–60313; File No. SR–BATS–
2009–023]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to Fees for Use
of BATS Exchange, Inc.
July 15, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 9,
2009, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. BATS has designated
the proposed rule change as one
establishing or changing a member due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2)
thereunder,4 which renders the
proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify
BATS Rule 15.1, entitled ‘‘Authority to
Prescribe Dues, Fees, Assessments and
Other Charges,’’ effective immediately.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
PO 00000
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
36293
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify
BATS Rule 15.1 to adopt new paragraph
(d), which will allow the Exchange to
pass on certain, specific fees that it is
charged by the company that operates
the data center where the Exchange’s
System 5 is located, as described in
further detail below.
Exchange Members wishing to colocate their trading hardware to the
Exchange’s System can do so by leasing
space directly from the company that
owns the data center. The Exchange has
no involvement in determining the
terms of any fees paid by the Member
to lease co-location space and does not
receive any proceeds from such fee.
Certain Members of the Exchange
maintain a co-location relationship with
another Trading Center’s 6 system that is
located in the same data center as the
Exchange. To co-locate to the Exchange,
rather than leasing additional space near
the Exchange’s System, some Members
choose instead to simply cross-connect
their existing trading hardware from the
space near another Trading Center’s
system to the Exchange’s System. In
such cases, the company that owns the
data center charges the Exchange a
monthly cross-connection fee. Pursuant
to the proposed rule the Exchange will
pass this cross connection fee on, in
full, to the applicable Member.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
13 17
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5 The term ‘‘System’’ is defined in BATS Rule
1.5(aa).
6 The term ‘‘Trading Center’’ is defined in BATS
Rule 2.11.
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36292-36293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17349]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-60306; File No. SR-FINRA-2009-035]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Its
Temporary and Permanent Cease and Desist Authority on a Permanent Basis
July 14, 2009.
On May 18, 2009, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') (f/k/a the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(``NASD'')) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to adopt its rules regarding the issuance of issue
temporary and permanent cease and desist orders on a permanent basis.
The proposal was published for comment in the Federal Register on June
9, 2009.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This
order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60028 (June 2,
2009), 74 FR 27364 (June 9, 2009) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since May 2003, pursuant to a pilot program approved by the
Commission \4\ and subsequent extensions,\5\ FINRA has had the
authority to issue temporary cease and desist orders (``TCDOs''); \6\
impose permanent cease and desist orders as a remedy in disciplinary
cases; and enforce cease and desist orders. FINRA proposed to make the
existing pilot program permanent.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47925 (May 23,
2003), 68 FR 33548 (June 4, 2003) (Order Approving File No. SR-NASD-
98-80).
\5\ The extensions were filed for immediate effectiveness and
were therefore not approved by the Commission. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 51860 (June 16, 2005), 70 FR 36427 (June
23, 2005) (SR-NASD-2005-061); Securities Exchange Act Release No.
55819 (May 25, 2007), 72 FR 30895 (June 4, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007-033);
and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60035 (June 3, 2009), 74 FR
27360 (June 9, 2009) (SR-FINRA-2009-034).
\6\ A TCDO is a preliminary order issued in connection with an
underlying disciplinary proceeding that has been initiated or will
be initiated immediately.
\7\ The rule filing does not make any substantive changes to the
existing pilot program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After careful review of the proposal, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to
[[Page 36293]]
a national securities association.\8\ In particular, the Commission
finds that the proposal is consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act,\9\ which requires, among other things that FINRA's rules be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The Commission also believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(7) of the Act,\10\
which provides that FINRA members, or persons associated with its
members, must be appropriately disciplined for violations of any
provisions of the Act or FINRA's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that making the pilot program permanent
will provide FINRA with a mechanism to take action in certain
situations against a member or an associated person that is alleged to
have engaged, or is engaging, in conduct that violates Commission,
FINRA, or NASD rules, when such intervention is necessary in order to
prevent likely significant dissipation or conversion of assets or other
significant harm to investors before the underlying disciplinary
proceeding can be completed. At the same time, the Commission believes
that FINRA's cease and desist provisions contain sufficient procedural
protections to ensure that respondents have the opportunity for a fair
hearing and, if applicable, review thereof. When it first sought cease
and desist authority in 2003, FINRA said that it would use the
authority sparingly and has, in fact, only used its authority once for
a TCDO and once for a permanent cease and desist order.\11\ FINRA
stated in its Notice that if the proposal were adopted on a permanent
basis, it would continue to use its cease and desist authority
judiciously. The Commission expects that FINRA will continue to use
this authority in an appropriate manner. The Commission believes it is
reasonable and consistent with the Act for FINRA to adopt the cease and
desist rules permanently to enable it to stop persons from engaging in
securities transactions or conduct affecting the marketplace, in
alleged violation of established rules, which is likely to cause harm
to investors or would adversely affect the public interest if not
addressed expeditiously.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Notice for a more detailed description of the matter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\12\ that the proposed rule change (SR-FINRA-2009-035), be, and
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-17349 Filed 7-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P