Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Mexico; Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 35844-35845 [E9-17278]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
35844
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Notices
Group Inc., Wayne, PA; and United
Defense, L.P., Arlington, VA.
2. Add the following companies as
new Members of the Certificate within
the meaning of section 325.2(l) of the
Regulations (15 CFR 325.(l)): AAR
Corp., Wood Dale, IL; Accenture,
Hartford, CT (controlling entity:
Accenture, Ltd., Hamilton Bermuda);
Airlaunch LLC, Kirkland, WA; Allfast
Fastening Systems, City of Industry, CA;
AMSAFE Aviation, Phoenix, AZ; AMT
II Corporation, New York, NY; Aurora
Flight Sciences Corporation, Manassas,
VA; AUSCO, Inc., Port Washington, NY;
B/E Aerospace, Inc., Wellington, FL;
Belcan Corporation, Cincinnati, OH;
Best Foam Fabricators, Inc., Chicago, IL;
BreconRidge Corporation, Ottawa,
Ontario; CAE USA Inc., Tampa, FL
(controlling entity: CAE Inc., Montreal,
Canada); Chromalloy Power Services
Corporation, San Antonio, TX
(controlling entity: Carlyle Group,
Washington, DC); Click Bond, Inc.,
Carson City, NV (controlling entity:
Physical Systems, Inc., Carson City,
NV); Click Commerce, Inc., Chicago, IL;
Cobham, Arlington, VA (controlling
entity: Cobham, plc, Winborne, Dorset,
United Kingdom); DynCorp
International LLC, Falls Church, VA;
Eaton Aerospace Operations, Irvine, CA
(controlling entity: Eaton Corporation,
Cleveland, OH); Eclipse Aviation
Corporation, Albuquerque, NM;
Electronic Data Systems Corporation,
Plano, TX (controlling entity: Hewlett
Packard, Palo Alto, CA); Erickson AirCrane Inc., Portland, OR; ESI North
America, Bloomfield Hills, MI
(controlling entity: ESI Group, Paris,
France); Flextronics International USA,
Inc., San Jose, CA (controlling entity:
Flextronics International, Ltd.,
Singapore); Flight Safety International,
Inc., Flushing, NY (controlling entity:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Omaha, NE);
FTG Circuits, Inc., Chatsworth, CA
(controlling entity: FTG Group
Corporation, Toronto, Canada); Groen
Brothers Aviation, Inc., Salt Lake City,
UT; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY; LAI
International, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ
(controlling entity: Spell Capital
Partners, LLC, Minneapolis, MN); LMI
Aerospace, Inc., St. Charles, MO; Lord
Corporation, Cary, NC; Marotta
Controls, Inc., Montville, NJ; McKechnie
Aerospace, Irvine, CA; Micro-Coax, Inc.,
Pottstown, PA; Micro-Tronics, Inc.,
Tempe, AZ; MicroSat Systems, Inc.,
Littleton, CO (controlling entity: Sierra
Nevada Corporation, Sparks, NV); Natel
Engineering Company, Inc., Chatsworth,
CA; National Machine Group, Stow, OH;
National Technical Systems, Inc.,
Calabasas, CA; Naverus, Inc., Kent, WA;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:50 Jul 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
The NORDAM Group, Inc., Tulsa, OK;
NYLOK Corporation, Macomb, MI
(controlling entity: Berkshire Hathaway,
Inc., Omaha, NE); Oracle USA, Inc.,
Redwood Shores, CA (controlling entity:
Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores,
CA); Pall Aeropower Corporation, New
Port Richey, FL (controlling entity: Pall
Corporation, East Hills, NY); Pinkerton
Government Services, Inc., Springfield,
VA (controlling entity: Securitas
Security Services, USA, Parsippany, NJ);
PPG Aerospace, Sylmar, CA (controlling
entity: PPG Industries, Pittsburgh, PA);
Science Applications International
Corporation, San Diego, CA; Siemens
PLM Software, Plano, TX (controlling
entity: Siemens AG, Munich, Germany);
SITA, Atlanta, GA (controlling entity:
SITA, Geneva, Switzerland); SM&A,
Newport Beach, CA; Southern California
Braiding Company, Inc., Bell Gardens,
CA; Space Exploration Technologies
Corporation, Hawthorne, CA; Sparton
Corporation, Jackson, MI; Spirit
AeroSystems, Inc., Wichita, KS;
TechniGraphics, Inc., Wooster, OH;
Timken Aerospace Transmissions,
LLC—Purdy Systems, Manchester, CT
(controlling entity: The Timken
Company, Canton, OH); Vibro-Meter,
Inc., Manchester, NH (controlling entity:
Meggitt PLC, Christchurch, Dorset,
United Kingdom); and WIPRO
Technologies, Beaverton, OR
(controlling entity: WIPRO
Technologies, Bangalore, India).
3. Change the listing of the following
Members: ‘‘Analytical Graphics, Inc.,
Malvern, PA’’ to the new listing
‘‘Analytical Graphics, Inc., Exton, PA’’;
‘‘BAE Systems North America, Inc.,
Rockville, MD’’ to the new listing ‘‘BAE
Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD’’; ‘‘B&E
Tool Company, Inc., Southwick, MA’’ to
the new listing ‘‘B&E Group, LLC,
Southwick, MA’’; ‘‘Curtiss-Wright
Corporation, Lyndhurst, NJ’’ to ‘‘CurtissWright Corporation, Parsippany, NJ’’;
‘‘E. I. duPont de Nemours & Company,
Wilmington, DE’’ to ‘‘Dupont Company,
New Castle, DE’’; ‘‘General Atomics
Aeronautical Systems, Inc., San Diego,
CA’’ to ‘‘General Atomics Aeronautical
Systems, Inc., Poway, CA’’; ‘‘HEICO,
Miami, FL’’ to ‘‘HEICO Corporation,
Hollywood, FL’’; ‘‘ITT Industries, Inc.,
McLean, VA’’ to ‘‘ITT Corporation,
White Plains, NY’’; ‘‘L–3
Communications Holdings, Inc., New
York, NY’’ to ‘‘L–3 Communications
Corporation, New York, NY’’;
‘‘Raytheon Corporation, Lexington, MA’’
to ‘‘Raytheon Company, Waltham, MA’’;
and ‘‘Woodward Governor Company,
Rockford, IL’’ to ‘‘Woodward Governor
Company, Fort Collins, CO’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: July 16, 2009.
Jeffrey Anspacher,
Acting Director, Office of Competition and
Economic Analysis.
[FR Doc. E9–17268 Filed 7–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–805]
Certain Circular Welded Non–Alloy
Steel Pipe from Mexico; Extension of
Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maryanne Burke or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5604 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2008, the Department
of Commerce (the Department) received
a timely request from interested party
U.S. Steel Corporation to conduct an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
circular welded non–alloy steel pipe
from Mexico.1 On December 24, 2008,
the Department published a notice of
initiation of this administrative review,
covering the period of November 1,
2007 to October 31, 2008. See Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 73 FR
79055 (December 24, 2008). The current
deadline for the preliminary results of
this review is August 2, 2009.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to complete the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested. However,
if it is not practicable to complete the
review within this time period, section
1 Because the last day of the anniversary month
of this order, November 30, 2008, fell on a Sunday,
petitioners filed their request for review on the next
business day, Monday, December 1, 2008.
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 21, 2009 / Notices
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend the time limit for
the preliminary results to a maximum of
365 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which
a review is requested.
The Department finds it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of this review within the original
time frame because we require
additional time to analyze Tuberia
Nacional, S.A. de C.V.’s (TUNA’s) claim
that it did not have exports, sales or
entries of subject merchandise to the
United States during the period of
review. See TUNA’s ‘‘no shipment’’
letter to the Department, dated January
23, 2009. In light of our ongoing
changed circumstances review, more
time is also necessary to consider the
relationship between Ternium Mexico,
S.A. de C.V. and Hylsa, S.A. de C.V, a
mandatory respondent in the instant
review. See Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Certain Circular
Welded Non–Alloy Steel Pipe and Tube
from Mexico, 74 FR 28883 (June 18,
2009). Accordingly, the Department is
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results of this
administrative review until no later than
November 30, 2009, which is 365 days
from the last day of the anniversary
month. We intend to issue the final
results no later than 120 days after
publication of the preliminary results
notice.
This extension is issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: July 15, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–17278 Filed 7–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–835]
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from the Republic of Korea:
Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Changed Circumstances Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 21, 2009.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) is rescinding the
countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) changed
circumstances review of stainless steel
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:50 Jul 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
sheet and strip in coils (‘‘S4’’) from the
Republic of Korea (‘‘Korea’’), as INI
Steel Company (‘‘INI’’) was found to be
the successor–in-interest to Inchon Iron
and Steel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Inchon’’) in other
segments of this proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Magd Zalok or Howard Smith, AD/CVD
Enforcement Office IV, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4162 and (202)
482–5193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 21, 2001, the
Department initiated the instant
changed circumstances review to
examine whether INI was the successor–
in-interest to Inchon. See Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from the
Republic of Korea: Notice of Initiation of
Changed Circumstances Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review, 66 FR
49639 (September 28, 2001). The
Department published its preliminary
results in this changed circumstances
review on June 3, 2002, and
preliminarily determined that Inchon
was the successor–in-interest to INI. See
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from the Republic of Korea: Notice of
Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 67 FR 38257
(June 3, 2002) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
We gave interested parties 10 days to
comment on the Preliminary Results.
The Department received no comments.
Scope of the Order
The products subject to the order are
certain stainless steel sheet and strip in
coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or
less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more
of chromium, with or without other
elements. The subject sheet and strip is
a flat–rolled product in coils that is
greater than 9.5 mm in width and less
than 4.75 mm in thickness and that is
annealed or otherwise heat treated and
pickled or otherwise descaled. The
subject sheet and strip may also be
further processed (e.g., cold–rolled,
polished, aluminized, coated), provided
that it maintains the specific
dimensions of sheet and strip following
such processing.
The merchandise subject to the order
is currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at
subheadings: 7219.13.00.30,
7219.13.00.50, 7219.13.00.70,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35845
7219.13.00.80, 7219.14.00.30,
7219.14.00.65, 7219.14.00.90,
7219.32.00.05, 7219.32.00.20,
7219.32.00.25, 7219.32.00.35,
7219.32.00.36, 7219.32.00.38,
7219.32.00.42, 7219.32.00.44,
7219.33.00.05, 7219.33.00.20,
7219.33.00.25, 7219.33.00.35,
7219.33.00.36, 7219.33.00.38,
7219.33.00.42, 7219.33.00.44,
7219.34.00.05, 7219.34.00.20,
7219.34.00.25, 7219.34.00.30,
7219.34.00.35, 7219.35.00.05,
7219.35.00.15, 7219.35.00.30,
7219.35.00.35, 7219.90.00.10,
7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25,
7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80,
7220.12.10.00,
7220.12.50.00,7220.20.10.10,
7220.20.10.15, 7220.20.10.60,
7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05,
7220.20.60.10, 7220.20.60.15,
7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80,
7220.20.70.05, 7220.20.70.10,
7220.20.70.15, 7220.20.70.60,
7220.20.70.80, 7220.20.80.00,
7220.20.90.30, 7220.20.90.60,
7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15,
7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the Department’s written
description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
Excluded from the scope of the order
are the following: (1) sheet and strip that
is not annealed or otherwise heat treated
and pickled or otherwise descaled, (2)
sheet and strip that is cut to length, (3)
plate (i.e., flat–rolled stainless steel
products of a thickness of 4.75 mm or
more), (4) flat wire (i.e., cold–rolled
sections, with a prepared edge,
rectangular in shape, of a width of not
more than 9.5 mm), and (5) razor blade
steel. Razor blade steel is a flat rolled
product of stainless steel, not further
worked than cold–rolled (cold–
reduced), in coils, of a width of not
more than 23 mm and a thickness of
0.266 mm or less, containing, by weight,
12.5 to 14.5 percent chromium, and
certified at the time of entry to be used
in the manufacture of razor blades. See
Chapter 72 of the HTSUS, ‘‘Additional
U.S. Note’’1(d).
The Department has determined that
certain specialty stainless steel products
are also excluded from the scope of the
order. These excluded products are
described below.
Flapper valve steel is defined as
stainless steel strip in coils containing,
by weight, between 0.37 and 0.43
percent carbon, between 1.15 and 1.35
percent molybdenum, and between 0.20
and 0.80 percent manganese. This steel
also contains, by weight, phosphorus of
0.025 percent or less, silicon of between
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35844-35845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-17278]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-805]
Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Mexico;
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maryanne Burke or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5604
or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2008, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
received a timely request from interested party U.S. Steel Corporation
to conduct an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
certain circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from Mexico.\1\ On
December 24, 2008, the Department published a notice of initiation of
this administrative review, covering the period of November 1, 2007 to
October 31, 2008. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 73 FR 79055
(December 24, 2008). The current deadline for the preliminary results
of this review is August 2, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because the last day of the anniversary month of this order,
November 30, 2008, fell on a Sunday, petitioners filed their request
for review on the next business day, Monday, December 1, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), requires the Department to complete the preliminary results of an
administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested. However,
if it is not practicable to complete the review within this time
period, section
[[Page 35845]]
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit
for the preliminary results to a maximum of 365 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested.
The Department finds it is not practicable to complete the
preliminary results of this review within the original time frame
because we require additional time to analyze Tuberia Nacional, S.A. de
C.V.'s (TUNA's) claim that it did not have exports, sales or entries of
subject merchandise to the United States during the period of review.
See TUNA's ``no shipment'' letter to the Department, dated January 23,
2009. In light of our ongoing changed circumstances review, more time
is also necessary to consider the relationship between Ternium Mexico,
S.A. de C.V. and Hylsa, S.A. de C.V, a mandatory respondent in the
instant review. See Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe and
Tube from Mexico, 74 FR 28883 (June 18, 2009). Accordingly, the
Department is extending the time limit for completion of the
preliminary results of this administrative review until no later than
November 30, 2009, which is 365 days from the last day of the
anniversary month. We intend to issue the final results no later than
120 days after publication of the preliminary results notice.
This extension is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: July 15, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-17278 Filed 7-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S